HomeMy WebLinkAboutDESIGN CHANGE ORDER NO 06 JOHNSON LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES PC WEBSTER FOR THE DETENTION CENTERPH PHASE 11011513CONTRACT COST SUMMARY
1. Original Contract Amount
2. Amt. of Previous Orders
3. Amt. of This Order:
4. Total additions lines 2 &3
(Line 4 shall show the net amount to be added
5. Revised Contract Total Amount
JOHNSON LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, PC
(Architect)
Heery International
(Program Manager)
Augusta- Richmond County
AUGUSTA — RICHMOND COUNTY
Webster Detention Center Phase II
DESIGN CHANGE ORDER NO: 006
OWNER: Augusta- Richmond County, 530 Greene Street, Augusta, GA 30911
ARCHITECT: JOHNSON LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, PC
PROJECT ID # 11 -104
PROGRAM MANAGER: HEERY INTERNATIONAL
Under the terms of the Contract and without invalidating the original provisions thereof, the change(s) in work described
below is(are) authorized for the change in contract amount herein set forth: (A description supporting the requirements
for additional services and this design change order is attached.)
JOHNSON LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, PC Design Change Order 02:
Increased scope of work for the Inmate Processing Center.
TOTAL
ADD
ADD
or (deducted) from the contract amount.)
By:
By:
By:
$220,142.54 Deduct
$151,000.00 Deduct
$371,142.54 Minus Deducts:
DATE: 2 -4 -13
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
(Owner - Mayor)
$ 611 // DISTRIBUTION: 1 original to Owner, 1 orig to Designer, 1 original to Program Manager
$151,000.00
$151,000.00
TOTALS
$497,200.00
$371,142.54
$ 868,342.54
z. 0 (Date)
(Date)
(Date)
PROPOSAL #: 3042.1102G
A
ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
CHANGE ORDER REQUEST
To: Richard Ingram SENT BY: ❑ Phone [
Heery International 0 Fax [
® Email [
RE: Charles B. Webster Detention Facility Phase II Program
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
DATE: December 12, 2012
REVISED: January 4, 2013
BY: Ralph Salzmann, PE
FEE: $151,000
Richard,
This change order request is a result of the increased scope of work for the Inmate Processing Center.
1. The A/E RFP for the Inmate Intake Processing Center was bid with Program Requirements based
on projections made in 2006.
2. Upon commencement of the project in 2012, new RCSO staff decided that the needs had changed,
which increased the A/E effort for determining the new program.
3. Changes included:
Adding extra holding cells,
Eliminating rooms,
Enlarging holding cells,
Adding additional space for the Release and Transportation processes,
Adding extra -wide corridors, which were required for the desired sight lines for security
purposes
4. These changes resulted in additional design effort by the A/E team as well as for the future
Construction Administration effort
The Contract for Professional Architectural Services Between Augusta, Georgia and Johnson, Laschober &
Associates, P.C. paragraph 8.1.1.3 states: "For the purposes of Subparagraph 8.1.1, should the Owner
request additions to the Project which would cause a change or changes in the scope of the Program of
Requirements or previously approved designs or design criteria, the CCAP shall be increased by the
aggregate amount of such change(s) and the commensurate adjustment to the compensation will be
negotiated."
We propose the commensurate adjustment be based on the original design fee vs. CCAP stated in the RFP,
or about 6.03 %.
The Construction Contract Award Price (CCAP) listed in the Contract is $7,490,831 and is defined in the
Contract as being equal to the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).
Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C.
1296 Broad Street
P.O. Box 2103
Augusta, GA 30903
Telephone: 706 - 724 -5756
FAX: 706-724-3955
Web Site: www.theJLAgroup.com
K: \30421102\ADMIN \CONTRACTS \WORKING FOLDER -NOT APPROVED \GMP CHANGE PROPOSAL - REVISED.DOC
Proposal # 3042.1102G
Date: January 4, 2013
Page 2 of 2
The final approved GMP for the Intake Processing Facility is $10,238,175, but that includes a $245,589
contingency amount.
The originally Architect fee is $452,000 which equates to about 6.03% of the Contract CCAP.
We request an additional $151,000 which is a rounded amount of 6.03% of the difference between the
original CCAP and the GMP minus the Contingency. [( 10238175 - 245589 - 7490831) *452000/7490831].
We will distribute this amount as per the original contract and will request payment based on the current
percent complete for the various phases.
Sincerely,
JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
ie4/J)------
Ralph Salzmann, PE
January 15, 2013
Mr. Bill Shanahan
Interim Director — Recreation, Parks & Facilities
2027 Lumpkin Road
Augusta, GA 30906
Dear Bill:
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Yours truly,
ederick L. Russell
Administrator
01- 15 -13: #15, #22, #34
cc: Ms. Donna Williams
Ms. Geri Sams
A Frederick L Russell, Administrator
Office of the Administrator
Tameka Allen, Deputy Administrator
William Shanahan, Deputy Administrator
Room 801 - Municipal Building
530 Greene Street - AUGUSTA, GA. 30901
(706) 821 -2400 - FAX (706) 821 -2819
www.augustaga.gov
The Augusta - Richmond County Commission, at their regular meeting held on Tuesday, Jan uary 15, 2013 took
action on the foilowin items.
15. Approved Design Change Order 6 that modifies the Standard Form of Contract for professional services
last dated October 7, 2011, between the Owner: Augusta, Georgia, a political subdivision of the State of
Georgia, acting by and through the Augusta Richmond County Commission; and the Architect: Johnson,
Laschober & Associates, P.C., for the Professional Services known as Architectural Services for the
Webster Detention Center, Phase II, Augusta Richmond County, Georgia. (Approved by Public Services
orn i ee an a 7, 2013)
22. Approved Change Order #1 for an additional $473,858.00 in fees to Virgo Gambill Architects on the
Augusta, Georgia Municipal Building Renovations and Modernization due to an increase in their scope of
work. (No recommendation from Public Services Committee December 10, 2012) (Approved by
Engineering Services Committee January 7, 2013)
34. No action taken on a motion to approve an expenditure of SPLOST funds dedicated to the New TEE
Center, in the amount of $891,561.00, for design, fabrication, installation and startup of all scope
associated with the new Pedestrian Bridge. (Approved by Public Services Committee December 10,
2012) (No action in Commission meeting December 18, 2012) (No recommendation by Public Services
Committee January 7, 2013)