The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPARKING STUDY PARKING DECK -TEE CENTER (AMENDMENT NO 1 TO AGREEMENT TVS November 9, 20Q9 Parkinq Study — TEE Center Executive Summary In the July 7, 2009 Commission Meeting, the Administrator received authorization to engage the Architect (TVS) to complete a parking analysis for the TEE Center. This report summarizes the assessment of the existing parking conditions, during peak hotel/convention occupancy, and presents findings and recommendations. The results of this study vary from the information previously used to estimate the need and subsequent costs of the proposed parking deck. The existing parking use data that was previously used was supplied by the hotel staff. This study confirmed that there was a variance in the data provided previously and the results of this study. Parking Assessment First, the current parking inventory was collected and verified. The parking on site is provided in a parking deck and finro parking lots. In total, approximately 712 spaces exist on site. This parking is primarily used by the hotel (guests and staff); however, during normal business hours office tenants use both the Staff Lot and the lower level of the parking deck. Second, to develop a better understanding of the peak hour parking demand, we collected hourf parking occupancy counts of all parking spaces in the study area, including the parking spaces in the adjacent vacant lot on a day that was predetermined as a typical busy day for the conference center. The day selected was September 18, 2009. We starting collecting our counts at 7:00 am and went to 7:00 pm so that we could capture a vast majority of guests checking in for the following day. We also observed parking at late in the night on September 17 to understand the overnight needs of the hotel on a night when all of the rooms were booked. On the day of our data collection, the hotel was 100% booked for that evening while the conference room occupancy was close to 95%. At night, the conference center had two dinners and a dance occurring. The peak hour of parking occupancy occurred at 11:00 am when 365 spaces were occupied. This peak hour of parkinq activitv represents approximatelv 49% utilization of all qarkinq sqaces. Of this number, we estimate that a minimum of 10% of the parkers were tenants of the adjacent office building, or roughfy 30 to 40 spaces. It appears that many of the hotel guests attend the conferences and meetings held at the conference center. In addition, it appears that Augustino's, the on-site restaurant, is used primarily by hotel guests. With this in mind, it appears that the peak hour parking demand of 365 spaces is very consistent with parking dernand that we typicaliy see at hotels with similar conference space and restaurant space — roughfy 1.0 spaces per hotel room. Thirci, in order to estimate future parking needs, we wili devefop a demand ratio based on conference room space. Based on a total of 41,000 square feet of conference room space utifized on the day of our study, we have developed the fo!lowing peak hour parking demand ratio for the complex that we will use for estimating future parking demand. 365 spaces / 41,000 square feet of occupied space = 9.0 spaces/1000 square feet. The Augusta TEE Center expansion will displace approximately 275 parking spaces. Therefore, without adding any additional parking, the available number of parking spaces for the conference center will be approximately 437 spaces (712 on-site spaces — 275 displaced spaces = 437 spaces). In order to accommodate future parking conditions, we will assume that the hotel is 100% occupied and that there are nighttime events scheduled at the conference center, in addition to daily conference events. From conversations with staff, the conference center routinely hosts nighttime events such as weddings, ballroom dances, receptions, and dinners. Based on this understanding, we have estimated that an additional 300 parking spaces are needed for accommodating the expansion of the conference center. Recommendations There are several options, including operations and sharing changes that should be considered for expanding and improving parking for the expansion of the TEE Center. Operations and Sharing: We recommend that the on-site parking be dedicated to hotel guests and staff only, not the adjacent office building. Since the parking needs will mosfi fikely peak at night, we recommend shared parking strategies for providing the parking supply that the conference center will need. Using the private lat off of Reynolds Street and the parking lot associated with the office building for nighttime events makes a great deal of sense since they are both relativefy close to the hote!/conference center. These initiatives would certainly be the least expensive, fastest, and easiest to implement. With respect ta parking development options, we recommend the following two options. Option 'I: Sueface Parkinq in Surroundinq Areas The development of a 300 space surface parking lot adjacent to 9th Street behind the retail. The surFace lot could utifize pay stations for generating revenue on a daily and nighttime basis. This parking option has several advantages inciuding: • inexpensive surface parking construction costs • opportunity to develop revenue for the fand owner � safer "link" to the hotel as one would not have to cross Reynolds Street for access The disadvanfiage to building a parking deck on this site, include: • possibility of future building development disp{acing the surface parking Isaving inadequate parking for the TEE Center • Assumes land is donated. If not donated then the land acquisition, or lease costs will add to the total project budget Option 1 Total Project Budget Cost: $1,094,444 (If shared parking as outlined above could be achieved, an alternative to 300 spaces would be a smaller 180 space lot. Since the future peak hour need is roughly 300 spaces, this altemative would require the shared use of the other parkinq lots, such as the private lot (120 spaces) along Reynolds and/or the office building parking lot (150 spaces) to accommodate peak hour parking needs.) Option 2: Parkinq Deck Bui{d a parking garage on the private parking lot along Reynolds Street. We recommend a parking structure that provides 400 spaces (120' x 300') for accommodating both the private (100 spaces) and the conference center needs (300 spaces}. The structure would consist of a simple four level, two-bay, single threaded helix design. The advantages of this site include: • building one structure capable of handling all parking needs • relativeiy close to the conference center • once purchased this site is committed to parkinq with no risk of displacement The disadvantages to building a parking deck on this site include: • greater construction and land acquisition costs • crossing busy Reynolds Street to access the conference center • Assumes land is donated. If not donated then the land acquisition, or lease costs will add to the total project budget. Option 2 Total Proiect Budqet Cost: $9,489,540 � � ��i � � - � � 4 � a� ' a t �t � , � ry� � � , . , r :. . - _ . .. t � , . . , : ! : .. . . . . .. � :��` � � .�'� � � �' y � � .�. z . � .. � �� .- � ��F�� '�� ', Parking Study ; ,� F ' � �� _ �__"._'_�'�____ "_ � �..__.._ _..—_..,._.._.__ _..._.., . 1 .��, . ' Augusta TEE �enter ; ��g�s��., G��ia ; � i i ° r ,�� - = -- - r a $. 7 I • � .: � �� ,� ' > " = � 4 �. i . i � �� ,� ' � r � � �. � � � �� ;� , .��""`,, x t � P � ; � — � .iH :.�. y �t� *'.r .ui _ � _ — ' . _ �� m � jx r '� _ � �� s �, � � = s, �4�� ,�,� �_�s.�s.., n, . ._ ...,. .. . _ ... . �� _ ,..�� x�._ r . „ w , ., x° � >� »W :p�n �, m n � { g -s i I � � �a" f �x �;�. J � ` ¢��e.�v�+ "�- I � i ,�" �'" f i�� - �� : �'. ,.�..-..' ^k.. �� k �.l��u� � � y r t; �� ;�r � m � � R k k ' �' ' .� $� �""� � � a �� i � �� y;�' � � .� ,„ v " �� ri +� ,� x �t ��_ _ � w � y ,� ki - �` .,. . . , , .� _ � : e ' .:�n i .: � �: ,� . . . . .� ' � .. .. ... '. � : NS :: . . . . .. � .. .P, . . � ; . � � „ ys ..�.� . .. � � ,,. ° i t _.. � f , „ , �. „ I, .. ' �;: �� ....��. kLL .._ . : 'ev 7 . _ , . �. . I �' - �� N�EERS �� C�EC :.x� r� 5500 Interstate North Parkway Suite 130 Atlanta, GA 30328 T. 770 850 30fi5 F. 770 E50 3066 Table af Contents A. Introduction/Background B. Approach C. Findings & Recommendations r T� r�1 Haa� �� ENGINEERS '°� ARCHITECTS TimHa�� Eh7GINEERS � RRCHF7BCTS Parking Study Augusta TEE Center Augusta, Georgia A. Introduction/Background Timofihy Haahs and Associates (TimHaahs) has developed a Parking Study to assess the current and future parking needs of fhe Augusta i'EE Center in Augusta, Georgia. The Augusta TEE Center includes two hotels, the Marriott Hotel &!nn and the Marriott Suites Hotel, providing a tota! of 372 rooms and approximately 44,168 square feet of meeting and conference room space. Figure 1 below depicts the Augusta TEE Center and adjacent properties, including a muiti-story office building off of 10 Street and retail along 9 Street. Figure 1: � . , . ��z F ! �x� : �r'� '� r: ��- `M �,�.. � : ' y ��" - �� .. y . � :.. �c � r� : '�""� S � �.� � �i,p� .i K _ ��' �~`,.'^� t�� r. p� , �y�,� Y .i r , � � , :. . - �. r r - • �,.. .w . � . +n � �' � � .•�nd �w. + � 1 �.�..��, . �J ��tl''�` � � h� q : � �' - w � � � 't'� � rt� '�!� � t %� � �'f�� 4��1' �� c� yap � 'G��G� t � � *..A �, �. �,�- � � � � �h ;r . �u.4 . �''u �Y ;, � i � � .. k ..'pF7��51'�,3 �x� uJ{19 � y�A'k-0I'��i��t -;� - ... wk . .. � 4:� ' ' , , �.: �"+� ��.r-. y .,}.. -� " y � .... . . . �_ :F iu �. ; i. . � . w � . � , „ D ; � i� � 1t u . r � � �~ �' �� s��: µ � . �� , ::. ,, ., .. . 't �, .� i � � '"'�``" !F�a � .�'�r`, r ��q '� � zy,. . �- " "�aa�lYl�es#at�r� yF ��'�^ ��r � s� �� %�� , ,° , ^,�"� "� �a��'�; { � �� , ff r ° r'" �, �� a�:,""�"�;�:, �, . � _ . }: �:;.. � � � The Augusta TEE Center is about to embark on an expansion that will add approximately 40,000 square feet of new exhibit and conference room space. The expansion is outlined in blue in Figure 1 above and essentially brings tne conference center out to Reynolds Street. The existing parking that serves the Augusta TEE Gente� consists of two parking lots and a parking deck (two fevels} totaiing 712 parking spaces. An adjacent vacant lot provides approximately 30 spaces for hotef stafE. October, 2009 � � Y� Ter�1H�a� �.S � � � ENGINE�ERS ARCHtTECTS � When complete, the Augusta TEE Center expansion will displace approximately 275 � parking spaces, a majority of these in the parking deck, plus all of the spaces found in the vacant lot currently used by hotel staff. B. Approach The current parking inventory was collected and verified. The parking on site is provided in a parking deck and two parking lots. In total, approximately 712 spaces exist on site. This parking is primarily used by the hotel (guests and staff); however, during normal business hours office tenants use both the Staff Lot and the lower level of the parking deck. To develop a better understanding of the peak hour parking demand, we collected hourly parking occupancy counts of all parking spaces in the study area, including the parking spaces in the ad}acent vacant lot on a day that was predetermined as a typical busy day for the conference center. The day selected was September 18, 2009. We starting collecting our counts at 7:00 am and went to 7:00 pm so that we could capture a vast majority of guests checking in for the following day. We also observed parking at late in the night on September 17 to understand the overnight needs of the hotel on a night when all of the rooms were booked. On the day of our data collection, the hotel was 100% booked for that evening while the conference room occupancy was close to 95°/a. At night, the conference center had two dinners and a dance occurring. So, based on our discussions with hotel staff and the General Manager, we felt that we were observing typical busy day conditions. Current Conditions � Overall, there are a total of 742 spaces that are used by hotel guests, office tenants, and hotel staff. Table 1 below provides a breakdown of the parking spaces. Table 1: Time of Day: Parkin Area S aces 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 Noon 1:0�' 2:00 ' 3:00 4:00 ' 5:00 6:00 7:00 P2, Deck 216 171 166 164 167 163 85 86 83 86 111 156 162 P1,Deck 283 65 72 84 82 79 54 60 51 54 67 62 80 Valet Parking 56 10 11 8 9 7 8 7 7 7 8 9 8 Augustino's Lot 35 26 32 30 32 31 22 24 19 20 18 12 25 Staff Lot 122 14 34 47 45 50 50 42 40 44 33 28 38 Vacant Lot 30 27 30 30 3D 30 29 27 32 26 23 27 24 Totats 742 313 345 363 '''365 360 248 246 232 237 260 294 337 % OCCUp/ed 42% 46°io 49% 49%0 49% 33% 33% 31% 32% 35% 40% 45% October, 20Q9 2 � �1 �iHt'�� S � ENGINEERS +.! ARCHkTBCTS Per Table 1, the peak hour of parking occupancy occurred at 11:00 am when 365 spaces were occupied. This peak hour of parking activity represents approximately 49% utilization of all parking spaces. Of this number, we estimate that a minimum of 10% of the parkers were tenants of the ad}'acent office building, or roughly 30 to 40 spaces. It appears that many of the hotel guests attend the conferences and meetings held at the conference center. In addition, it appears that Augustina's, the on-site restaurant, is used primariiy by hotel guests. With this in mind, it appears that the peak hour parking demand of 365 spaces is very consistent with parking demand that we typicalfy see at hotels with similar conference space and restaurant space — roughly 1.0 spaces per hotel room. Future Conditions In order to estimate future parking needs, we will develop a demand ratio based on conference room space. Base.d on a total of 41,000 square feet of conference room space utilized on the day of our study, we have developed the following peak hour parking demand ratio for the complex that we wilf use for esfimating future parking demand. 365 spaces / 41,000 square feet of occupied space = 9.0 spaces/�000 square feet. 9.0 spaces/1000 SF is consistent with recommended conference center parking demand per several sources including Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Shared Parking, Second Edition and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation, 3r Edition. The Augusta TEE Center expansion will displace approxirnately 275 parking spaces. A majority of the displaced spaces will come from a reconfguration of the exis#ing parking deck. The balance of displaced parking spaces will come from the Staff Lot. Therefore, without adding any additiona! parking, the available number of �arking spaces for the conference center will be approximately 437 spaces (712 on-site spaces — 275 dispfaced spaces = 437 spaces). In order to accommodate future parking conditions, we wifl assume that the hotel is 100% occupied and that there are nighttime events scheduled at the conference center, in addition to daily conference events. From conversations with staff, the conference center routinety hosts nighttime events such as weddings, ballroom dances, receptions, and dinners. We understand that these events happen at least once a month, if not more. Based on this understanding, we have estimated that an additional 300 parking spaces are needed for accommodating the expansion of the conference center as outlined in Table 2, found on page 4. October, 20Q9 3 � Tirn�aa� �.� . Ei�GiNEERS �� /iRCHfTf Tabie 2: Exrsting!Park�ng lnuen#ory � � - 712 Spaces 5paces Lost due to Fxparision� � _ �s 275 Spaces ti 4 ,a ;� Available.S a�es after`Ex� arisron �.�.�-; '' - ' 437 S aces Current-Peak HoUr Parkrng Demand h�. �.-� , '' 370 Spaces t:, i y, k �,� .�' 3 J � � r r �. �. ,; � , . . . . . �. � . Es'frm�tea' Fu�ure Neecl ' "" ��r � � 4 t � �- � ,-� � 360 Spaces � r �,,3�' '� „� .�� I � ;� m �}�+ �` ti � } 3` . . �.T�o�a/ P_arktn .".5 ace.Need'afferEx ansron, ;r : "" .• ` 730 S aces � � k " lotal Fcitur� 1Veeds '� � . f � F ; , � `� � � 730 Spaces _ � � � �e � � ,9vaiCable Park�ng affer�xpans�on„ s �`,� 7 F , , y, 437 Spaces Amount of.lalev� Parkin Needed 293 ! S aces Parking lmprovement We be(ieve there are several options that decision makers should consider for expanding and improving parking for serving the expansion of the TEE Center. For example, we would strongfy encourage that the on-site parking is deciicated to hotel guests and staff onfy, not the adjacent office buiiding. Since the parking needs will most likely peak at night, we strongly encouraae shared parkinq strateqies for providing the parking supply that the conference center wil( need. Using the private lot off of Reynolds Street and the parking fot associated with the office building for nighttime events makes a great deal of sense since they are both relatively c(ose to the hotel/conference center. These initiatives would certainly be the least expensive, fastest, and easiest to implement. With respect to parking development options, we suggest the following options. Option 1a — consists of building 300, well defined, surface parking spaces behind the retail on 9 Street. Option 1 b(shown in Figure 2 on the following page) consists of building 18Q, well defined surface spaces in a smaller lot behind the retail on 9 Street. The advantages of building either Option 1a or 1b include: • inexpensive surface parking constr�uction costs • opportunity to develop revenue for the fand owner • safer "fink" to the hote! as one would not have to cross Reynolds Street for access The disadvantages of Option 1 a and 1 b include: • any future building development wou(d displace parking • Buifding Option 1 b would require the shared use of other parking assets to rtzeet peak hour needs We woufd suggest that pay stations be instalfed for colfecting daily and nighttime revenues. As mentioned above, if Option 1 b were built, additional parking will be needed to meet the peak hour needs of the conference cenfier. This additional parking could include the shared use of the private fot (120 spaces) along Reynolds and/or the office building parking lot (150 spaces). October, 2009 4 Tir�Ha��4� �i:GINEERS P .:7. ARCHfT�CTS Figure 2— Option 1 b, Parking Lot Devefopment: � _ �. .. . =� .. r . >�.� J - , R _ % y , i � � ,' � � � �u� . . � �� ... � { � � � : . , � _a ' n�s � ` .,�- � f .� .. �y��r � � _ ,,'� ��'`,'. � � � . . �� '�� l � e ,. p x ` jl ,. t . i h a,�' ��:,} „ :a - . X' t[ �§.`�� i 'L;.' q _ . � A M;� . h � . '�' t� � �i I ' ��' �`��{a t _ 4 � � � ,e hk � : �,� �'� 1' E �� ' � � � P � � ' � ' i �} . lr�w..x -. f t........,t+�,`.r u�'e�.i.�� _ u��3b . Option 2 consists of building a parking garage on the private parking lot along Reynolds Street. As shown in Figure 3, we would suggest a parking structure that provides 400 to 420 spaces (120' x 300') for accommodating both the private (100 spaces) and the conference center needs (300 spaces). The structure would consist of a simple four level, two-bay, single threaded helix design. The benefits of this site include: • building one structure capable of handling all parking needs • relatively close to the conference center • once purchased, this site is committed to parking with no risk of displacement The downside to building a parking deck on this site, incfude: • greater construction and land acquisition costs • crossing busy Reynolds Street to access the conference center Figure 3— Option 2, Parking Garage on Private Lot: II "'na :°�4 "� '�' F �� etr :-� � �. � � , : �r r.�,�� ra., . �,. . ��` � � �' � � � � a ' � , �a �� '�� r"; ,�:: ; 9 � �� 4 � � � �,� �' �,` � .,., ,..; _ .. . r � ' y � +�' � � � ,;�,. i`s*.�.w k , � �" aF i r � ,j'� °"'f� e : r�"M � � 't �ya�aa�� , �F ' �'�'� 4, M � as s c A 7 : 1. 1� � {�� S J�� 9 .� : • � a� # ,{ � P . ro . . �v� '°M Ct��.t� �,4�fi z'FT . r �. _��'�� ',�� '� �` � ��, � �. . x �� .� � '� � �, p �,. � �`", .z� ��.,.�.�n'�`� '�� b� �� K:i� � � � ;yw p ��' -�" � � �. y-�' R � ��. ^ � ��i 9. 1." i g F �� ..t�.�:i� �•t�{ qE t '> y � M �� r �' � �� ,a"� �' ,, �;��. h' �. u ' ��r ��,�, _ ,s;: , . , ,: ..� , . � ;.. � J - . . . .�, •;i� :. . .✓• . . . ,. '� e .. t:' _.3 . , � r. �. s � k �3> � . � . � l � �^� i 9�� k�'� .'_ r �� .,� �' � } � - � �� . r� ,�: «: .�.s�r .:� i �� ;v:._� � -�._. October, 2009 5 TimH�a�� ENGINE,FRS �, ARG C. Recommendations • Currentiy, it appears that the peak hour need for the conference center and hotel is approximately 365 spaces. • We have devefoped a parking demand ratio for the conference center of 9.0 spaces/1000 SF. • In total, 742 spaces exist for hote! guests and staff (712 on-site and 30 off-site). In addition to these users, at least 30 to 40 parkers from the adjacent affice building utilize the lower level of the parking deck and the parking lots located in front of the Marriott Hotel & Inn. • The Augusta TEE Center expansion will displace approximatefy 275 spaces in both the parking deck and the surface lot. • After the expansion, only 437 spaces will remain for serving the conference center. We estimate that the peak hour parking demand of the conference center after the expansion will be approximately 730 spaces; therefore, approximately 300 spaces are needed for meeting future peak hour parking needs. • There are several parking initiatives worth consideration for meeting the future needs of the conference center. At the very least, we strongly encourage that that office building tenants park off site. We also strongly encourage the shared use of adjacent parking (ots, such as the office building fot (150 spaces) and the private lot along Reynolds Street (120 spaces), as these will be the least expensive and most readily available parking initiatives to carry forward. • We recammend considering the following surface parking options: Opfion 1 a— construction of a 300 space parking lot behind 9 Street, Option 1 b— construction of a 180 space parking lot behind 9�' Street. The surface parking options provide proximity, safety, low construction costs, and land ownership thai make them attractive options. If Option 1 b is considered, additional parking will be needed to meet the peak hour needs of the conference center such as sharing the private parking located along Reynolds Street or behind the office building adjacent to the Marriott Hotel. • Option 2 consists of the construction of a 400+-space parking deck on the privatE lot along Reynolds Street. A four-level deck would provide the parking needed for both private and conference center use. This option would place the conference center's parking•in a single structure and be relatively close to conference center; however, it would also require one to cross Reynolds Street, invofve land acquisition costs, and cost more than surface parking. • In sum, we believe that the combination of sharing existing parking resources and the construction of either a surface lot or a parking structure on the properties mentioned above will provide sufficient parking supply for accommodating the peak hour parking needs of the TEE Center expansion. October, 2009 ----._._... ___...-- ---____----- � _ __ ..__ - -- - --- ------ _ ---- AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGftEEMENT FOR STANDA,R.D FORM OF CONTRACT FQR ARCHI.TECTURAL SERVICES Augusta Trade, Exhibit and Event Center January 14, 2010 � WHEREAS an AGREEMENT for professional services was made, dated 21st of October, 2008, BETWEEN the Owner: Augusta Georgia a political subdivision of t e State of Georeria, actine bv and throush the Richmond Countv Commission: and the Design Consultant: Thomson Ventulett Stainback and Associates Inc., for Professional Services known as: Architectural Design Services for Augusta Trade Exhibit and Event Center. Aueusta Richmond Countv, Geor �i�a.� and WHEREAS the parties to this AGREEMENT further agree that said AGREEMENT should be modified to reflect the mutual desires of the Owner and Design Consultant to facilitate an increase in the scope of the project, adding design services for a 400 Parking Deck, as described herein; and WHEREAS, the parties to said AGREEMENT desire to amend the following documents incorporated into the Agreement, to wit: AR.TICLE 5 — BASIC SERVICES AR,TICLE 8 — COMPENSATION AR,TICLE 20 — ENTIRE AGREEMENT . EXHIBIT A — BASIC SERVICES EXHIBIT B— PROGR.AM OF REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT C — SCHEDULE 1. A.RTICLE 5— BASIC...�ERVICES, is hereby amended and attached to and made a part of this AGREEMENT and designated as ARTICLE 5— BASIC SERVICES - AMENDMENT 1. 2. AR,TICLE 8— COMPENSATION, is hereby amended and attached to and made a part of this AGREElVIENT and designated as AR,TICLE 8— COMPENSATION - AMENDMENT 1. 3. ARTICLE 20 — ENTIRE AGREEMENT, is hereby amended and attached to and made a part of this AGREEMENT and designated as ARTICLE 20 — ENTIRE AGREEMENT - AMENDMENT 1. 4. EXHIBIT A— BASIC SERVICS, is hereby amended and attached to and made a part of this AGREEMENT and designated as EXHIBIT A— BASIC SERVICES - AMEIVDMENT 1. 5. EXHIBIT B— PR,OGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS, is hereby amended and attached to and made a part of this AGREEMENT and designated as EXHIBIT B — PROGP�.AM OF REQUIREMENTS - AMENDMENT 1. 6. EXHIBIT C— SCHEDULE, is hereby amended and attached to and made a part of this AGREEMENT and designated as EXHIBIT C— SCHEDULE - AMENDMENT 1. 7. All other terms and c onditions of the AGREEMENT not specificallv amended herein shall remain in full force and effect This amended AGREEMENT, together with referenced Exhibits A, B, and C, constitutes the entire agreement between the Owner and Design Consultant and supersedes all prior written or oral understandings. This AGREEMENT and said Exhibits may only be amended, supplemented, mociified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. This AGREEMENT and said Exhibits shall hereafter be referred to as the AGREEMENT. A2 In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this AGREEMENT as of the date noted. OWNER DESIGN CONSULTANT Augusta, Georgia, a political Thomson, Ventulett, Stainback and Subdivision of the State of Georgia Associates, Inc. Acting by and through the Augusta Aichmond County Commission / �� sy: �` - � `�� p �.. �+a��Deke S. Copenhaver R,og eue swchwander � � Mayor President Date: � 1 Z�� I� Date: �'�'��" �� Attest: ' Atte . • / � Clerk Witness A3 ARTICLES 1-4 NO CHANGES ARTICLE 5 BASIC SERVICES 5.1 The Architect shall provide the basic services as described in Exhibit A, amended herein to include the TEE Center and 400 Space Parking Deck. ARTICLES 6 AND 7 NO CHANGE5 ARTICLE 8 COMPENSATION Add to the end of paragraph 8.1.1: The Architect shall receive the following compensation, in addition to the TEE Center compensation, for the Parking Deck Basic Services: $471,425 (Four Hundred Seventy One Thousand Four Hundred and Twenty Five Dollars and No Cents, plus reimbursable expenses not to exceed $45,000 (Forty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents). ARTICLES 9 —19 NO CHANGES � ARTICLE 20 Add 20.2 This agreement is amended by Amendment 1. A4 EXHIBIT A BASIC SERVICES - AMENDMENT 1 Add to paragraph 1: The services are herein amended to include a new 400 space parking deck located across from the TEE Center. All basic services, as outlined herein, shall be provided for the new parking deck, except for LEED certification services. AS _ EXHIBIT B PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS — AMENDMENT 1 Add to the end of paragraph 1: The program for the new parking deck shall be as follows: A. Project Understanding 1. Project: Parking Deck and Surface Parking Lot based on the Final Parking Study prepared by Timothy Haahs & Associates, Inc. 2. Project Location: The project is located on the corner of Reynolds Street and James Brown Boulevard in downtown Augusta, across the street from the new Augusta TEE Center conference facility. The site includes an existing service station, currently a hot dog stand, on the corner of Reynolds and James Brown that will need to be addressed with Historic Augusta. The design must also be sensitive to an adjacent television satellite dish farm and another historic property adjacent to the northwest corner. 3. Project Description: The project is a new ground up parking garage of approximately 400 parking spaces. Although it will be managed independently, the new deck will support the viaitors of the TEE Center. The architecturally skinned deck will be open and front onto at least two urban street edges. Should expansion be considered, it is assumed that it would not be vertical, but horizontal. If the final design of the deck includea a parking area currently used by the adjacent television station satellite trucks, accommodations will need to be made within the deck for the taller vehicles. 4. Project Program: We understand that the project will include 400 parking spaces. 5. Project Budget: We understand the approximate Construction Contract Award Price (CCAP) to be $7,125,000.00 (Seven million, one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars). 6. Project Delivery Method: The project will be constructed by a Construction Managex At- Risk, independent of the Augusta TEE Center construction project. B. Project Team 1. Basic Professional Design Services: i. Design Architect: tvsdesign will assume design responsibilities through the Schematic Design Phase and will maintain aesthetic oversight of subsequent phases. The Associate Architect will be the Axchitect of Record and will assume design development phase through construction administration phase responsibilities. ii. Associate Architect and Architect of Record: Studio 3 Design Group. iu. Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Fire Protection Engineering: Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. . 2. The following special consultants' design services are included in this proposal: i. Civil Engineering: Cranston Engineering Group P.C. ii. Parking: Timothy Haas & Associates, Inc. iii. Security: Leppard Johnson iv. Graphics: Jones Worley C. Compensation 1. Compensation: Provide the total lump sum filced fee per the following phase schedule, for design and construction administration services. Phase Amount Design Narrative/Schematic Design $70,714.00 Design Development Phase $94,2$5.00 Construction Document Phase $164,999.00 Permitting and Bidding/Negotiation $23,571.00 Construction Administration $113,142.00 Final Completion $4,714.00 Total Design Service Lump Sum Fi�ced Fee $471,425.00 Expenses (allowance) 45,000.00 Total Labor and Expenses $516,425.00 3. Fee Breakdown by Consultant: Firm Name % of Fee Amount Design Architect: 16.97% $80,000.00 Architect of Record: Studio 3(Local) 26.20% $123,500.00 Structure/MEP: Johnson Laschober Assoc. (Local) 40.30% $190,000.00 Civil Engineering: Cranston Engineering (Local) 7.15% $33,725.00 Parking: Timothy Haas &.Associates, Inc. 4.18% $19,700.00 Graphics: Jones Worley 3.92% $18,500.00 Security: Leppard Johnson 127% $6,000.00 Total % of Local Participation 73.65% $347,225.00 Total % of non-Local Participation 26.35% $124,200.00 Total Labor Fees 100.00% $471,425.00 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE — AMENDMENT 1 Add the following paragraph after the table: The schedule for the new parking deck shall provide for a substantial completion date no later than December 31, 2010. " _ __