HomeMy WebLinkAboutDepartment of Transportation (4)
Augusta Richmond GA
DOCUMENT NAME: 6.e\;5\. D\- ~(1~'(l-Mon
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ctx\\(()~~
YEAR: qq
BOX NUMBER: 015
FILE NUMBER: \ L\l\1"'5
NUMBER OF PAGES: l\.~
/..--
-
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
DATE CONSTRUCTION
.: "AUTHORIZED
"
-~.
'0
~N-:
, ,'#,"',
f" r:.
-- It. .
;'~
SEP 0 2 1~99
CONTRACT
DO NOT UNSTAPLE THIS BOOKLET... . ENTER ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION
---------------------------- EITHER BY HAND OR BY STAMP.
S
.t:
.'
DATE OF OPENING : NONE
CALL ORDER : NONE
i(;' "
I.t,/ll
CONTRACT ID : C31654-99-000-0
PCN
PROJECTS AND CONTRACT NO.
~~~~5~~;~(i4gf:~~i,-.}~,~27 - - ,,";.:'
SECO~1) srRt:c-7 :OdTrAL-i
jJ,f~#-.' .1Z 7- i;1~~' -'8Iztf6.fl
3Z. '7 - /:)9- - z. '1 "1/~dP
\
3291950Cl0000
COUNTY : RICHMOND
. CODE: 5AU23 0
I 1. CITY OF AUGUSTA
I
I
- .
, -1
~./ !
'dT1- cO~rrUCtl"~; .
- ."~'
0-21- 1r
( I
'i
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
..,
"'i:
CONTRACT ID : C31654-99-000-0
,.,
'-
GRADING, DRAINAGE, BASE AND PLANT MIX PAVING ON 2ND ST
OUTFILL IN AUGUSTA.
SITE
00
COMPLETE CONTRACT
~ "
\
CONTRACT TIME
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
NONE
-i' T
f ;
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
CONTRACT SCHEDULE
DATE
PAGE
04/16/99
3
. CONTRACT ID: C31654-99-000-0
,
. .
.
PROJECT(S) : 3291950C10000 PRLOP-8530-59 (245) C1
.> LINE
NO
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
APPROX.
QUANTITY
AND UNITS
UNIT PRICE
BID AMOUNT
DOLLARS I CTS
DOLLARS ICTS
SECTION 0001 ROADWAY
427,274.25
170-1000 FLOATING SILT
0005 RETENTION BARRIER
1,000.000
7.42000
7,420.00
LF
171-0010 TEMPORARY SILT
0010 FENCE, TYPE A
800.000
1.51000
1,208.00
LF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. .
171-0030 TEMPORARY SILT
0015 FENCE, TYPE C
1,900.000
2.24000
4,256.00
LF
207-0203 FOUND BKFILL
0020 MATL, TP II
525.000
. 16.70000
8,767.50
CY
228-1000 GRADING-
0025 MODIFIED, INCL HAUL
0.210
17,098.18000
3,590.62
MI
310-1101 GR AGGRBASE
0030 CRS, INCL MATL
525.000
5.36000
2,814.00
TN
318-1000 SELECTED
0035 MATERIAL SURFACE COURSE
250.000
4.80000
1,200.00
CY
402-1801 RECYCLED ASPH
0040 CONC PATCHING, INCL
BITUM MATL
100.000
22.72000
2,272.00
TN
- ~------------------------------------------------------------------------------
402-1811 RECYCLED ASPH
0045 CONC LEVELING, INCL
-t BITUM MATL
200.000
18.63000
3,726.00
TN
~
.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
402-3140 RECYCLED ASPH
0050 CONC 9.5 MM SUPERPAVE,
GP 1 OR 2, INCL BITUM
MATL
650.000
18.97000
12,330.50
TN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
l'
;
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
CONTRACT SCHEDULE
DATE
PAGE
04/16/99
4
~~ONTRACT ID: C31654-99-000-0
- PROJECT(S) : 3291950C10000 PRLOP-8530-59 (245) C1
.~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINE
NO
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
APPROX.
QUANTITY
AND UNITS
UNIT PRICE
BID AMOUNT
DOLLARS I CTS
DOLLARS ICTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
402-3141 RECYCLED ASPH
0055 CONC 12.5 MM SUPERPAVE,
GP 1 OR 2, INCL BITUM
MATL
160.000
18.97000
3,035.20
TN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
413-1000 BITUM TACK COAT
0060
900.000
0.45000
405.00
GL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
432-5010 MILL ASPH CONC
0065 PVMT, VARIABLE DEPTH
11,500.000
0.71000
8,165.00
SY
------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------
441-6222 CONC CURB &
00.70 GUTTER, 8 IN X 30 IN, TP
2 LF
100.000
4.55000
455.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
500-381.0 CLASS AA
0075 CONCRETE, INCL REINF
STEEL
11.000
271.79000
2,989.69
CY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
500-9999 CLASS B CONC,
0080 BASE OR PVMT WIDENING
60.000
91.38000
5,482.80
CY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
525-1000 COFFERDAM
0085
2.000
2,000.00000
4,000.00
EA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
550-1180 STORM DRAIN
. -
0090 PIPE, 18 IN, H 1-10
400.000
16.52000
6,608.00
LF
.~------------------------------------------------------------------------------
550-1240 STORM DRAIN
c ~0095 PIPE, 24 IN, H 1-10
400.000
19.55000
7,820.00
LF
-------------------------.------------------------------------------------------
.i 550-1480 STORM DRAIN
.~0100 PIPE, 48 IN, H 1-10
1,250.000
54.39000
67,987.50
LF
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
550-1481 STORM DRAIN
0105. PIPE, 48 IN, H 10-15
600.000
51. 48000
30,888.00
LF
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
CONTRACT SCHEDULE
:~CONTRACT ID: C31654-99-000-0
, PROJECT(S) : 3291950C10000 PRLOP-8530-59 (245) C1
LINE
NO
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
550-1482 STORM DRAIN
0110 PIPE, 48 IN, H 15-20
603-2024 STN DUMPED RIP
0115 RAP, TP 1, 24 IN
615-1000 JACK OR BORE
0120 PIPE -
668-1100 CATCH BASIN,
0125 GP 1
668-2100 DROP INLET, GP
0130 1
668-4300 STORM SEWER
0135 MANHOLE, TP 1
668-4400 STORM SEWER
0140 MANHOLE, TP 2
668-4412 STORM SEWER
0145 MANHOLE, TP 2, ADDL
DEPTH, CL 2
668-4413 STORM SEWER
0150 MANHOLE, TP 2, ADDL
DEPTH, CL 3
668-5005 JUNCTION BOX,
;, 0155 SPCL DES BOX 1
668-5005 JUNCTION BOX,
0160 SPCL DES BOX 2
APPROX.
QUANTITY
AND UNITS
1,150.000
LF
100.000
SY
490.000
LF
3.000
EA
2.000
EA
6.000
EA
10.000
EA
66.000
LF
34.000
LF
1. 000
EA
1. 000
EA
DATE
PAGE
UNIT PRICE
DOLLARS I CTS
78.00000
17.78000
148.61000
864.51000
772.36000
981.92000
1,171. 25000
153.20000
148.00000
18,000.00000
22,400.00000
,.
04/16/99
5
BID AMOUNT
DOLLARS ICTS
89,700.00
1,778.00
72,818.90
2,593.53
1,544.72
5,891.52
11,712.50
10,111. 20
5,032.00
18,000.00
22,400.00
i
i .,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
CONTRACT SCHEDULE
DATE
PAGE
~CONTRACT ID: C31654-99-000-0
o PROJECT (S) : 3291950CI0000 PRLOP-8530-59 (245) Cl
04/16/99
6
LINE
NO
UNIT PRICE
~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BID AMOUNT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
APPROX.
QUANTITY
AND UNITS
DOLLARS I CTS
706-1003 TURF
0165 ESTABLISHMENT, TP C
0.410
661.15000
AC
ITOTAL BID
DOLLARS ICTS
271.07
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
427;274.25
" ;;
'I' "
i
THIS ~REEMENT MADE AND ENTERED INTO THIS THE ~AY OF
Jz,,~. 19li BY AND BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI.ON
PARTY OF THE FIRST PART (HEREINAFTER CALLED THE DEPARTMENT) AND THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF---AUGUSTA
(HEREINAFTER CALLED.THE CITY) WHO HAVE BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED TO
EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT:
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, THE DEPARTMENT AND THE CITY DESIRE THE IMPROVEMENT AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A CERTAIN FACILITY AND THE CITY DESIRES AND AGREES
TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL THE MATERIAL AND TO DO AND PERFORM ALL
THE WORK AND LABOR FOR SAID PURPOSE. THE PROJECT BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN.
NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PREMISES, THE MUTUAL COVENANTS
HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE SUM OF ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) BY EACH OF THE
PARTIES TO THE OTHER IN HAND PAID, THE RECEIPT WHEREOF IS HEREBY.
ACKNOWLEDGED, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
(1) THE WORK' AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN STRICT AND ENTIRE CONFORMITY
WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CONTRACT AND THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
PREPARED (OR APPROVED) BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER OR HIS
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE THE ORIGINALS OF WHICH ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER AND WHICH SAID PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT AS FULLY AND
TO THE SAME EFFECT AS IF THE SAME HAD BEEN SET FORTH AT LENGTH IN THE
.BODY OF THIS AGREEMENT. THIS CONTRACT WILL BE EXECUTED AND CONSTRUCTED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, 1993 EDITION,
AND THE 1997 SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION BOOK AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS
INCLUDED IN AND MADE A PART OF THIS CONTRACT.
(2) IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT MATERIAL PITS ARE TO BE FURNISHED BY THE
CITY AT NO COST TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
(3) IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WILL NOT
PARTICIPATE IN THE COST OF ANY UTILITY FACILITY REMOVAL AND RELOCATIONS
NECESSARY IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, UNLESS
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT. THE (COUNTY/CITY) SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR HANDLING THE ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE UTILITY OWNERS
FOR ANY REMOVAL AND RELOCATIONS NECESSARY. THE (COUNTY/CITY) SHALL
GIVE THE UTILITY OWNERS AMPLE NOTICE, OF THE IMPENDING CONSTRUCTION,
TO ALLOW TIME FOR ENGINEERING AND MATERIAL ORDERS REQUIRED FOR ANY
REMOVAL AND RELOCATIONS NECESSARY.. ALSO, THE (COUNTY/CITY).AGREES TO
CLEAR RIGHTS-OF-WAY OBSTRUCTIONS WITHOUT EXPENSE TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION. FOR PURPOSE OF APPLYING PROVISIONS. OF THIS
PARAQRAPH,.RAILROADS ARE CONSIDERED UNTILITIES. IN ADDITION TO THE
FOREGOING, THE (COUNTY/CITY) SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL OF PLANS AND
ACQUIRE EASEMENTS OR OTHER'PROJ;>ERTY RIGHTS FROM THE RAILROAD FOR
-' CONSTRUCTION WITHIN RAILROAD PROPERTY/RIGHT OF WAY AND SHALL PROVIDE
.' FOR THE PROTECTION OF RAILROAD INTERESTS, INCLUDING FLAGGING
AND INSPECTION, AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE RAILROAD.
= !
.~ (4) IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE
ONLY AND SUBJECT EITHER TO INCREASE OR DECREASE AND ANY INCREASES OR
DECREASES ARE TO BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE GIVEN .
(5) THE WORK SHALL BEGIN WITHIN TEN DAYS AFTER NOTIFICATION TO BEGIN
WORK BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER TO THE CITY AND SHALL BE CARRIED
THROUGH TO COMP~ETION WITHOUT UNREASONABLE DELAY AND WITHOUT SUSPENSION
OF WORK UNLESS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER.
IF THERE ARE UNREASONABLE DELAYS OR UNAUTHORIZED SUSPENSIONS OF WORK,
THE DEPARTMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHARGE THE CITY, NOT AS A
PENALTY BUT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, THE COST TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
MAINTAINING ITS ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION FORCE ON THE WORK OR.TO CANCEL
THIS CONTRACT AND COMPLETE THE WORK BY CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE.
(6) THE WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
GEORGIA UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE ENTIRE SATISFACTION OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. THE DECISION OF THE CHIEF
ENGINEER UPON ANY QUESTION CONNECTED WITH THE EXECUTION OR FULFILLMENT
OF THIS AGREEMENT AND INTERPRETATION OF THE SPECIFICATIONS OR UPON ANY
FAILURE OR DELAY IN THE PROSECUTION OF THE WORK BY THE CITY SHALL BE
FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE.
(7) THE CITY AGREES TO PERFORM ALL EXTRA WORK THAT MAY BE REQUIRED
OF THEM ON THE BASIS OF ACTUAL COST.
(8) THE FINANCING OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
PAYMENTS WILL BE MADE ON MONTHLY STATEMENTS AS THE WORK PROGRESSES.
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION
THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT THE PROVISIONS OF CODE SECTIONS 50-24-1
THROUGH 50-24-6 OF THE OFFICIAL CODE OF GEORGIA ANNOTATED, RELATING TO
THE 'DRUG_FREE WORKPLACE ACT', HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH IN FULL. THE
UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT: .
(1) A DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S
EMPLOYEES DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT; AND
(2) EACH CONTRACTOR WHO HIRES A SUBCONTRACTOR TO WORK IN A DRUG-FREE
WORKPLACE SHALL SECURE FROM THAT SUBCONTRACTOR THE FOLLOWING WRITTEN
CERTIFICATION: 'AS PART OF THE SUBCONTRACTING AGREEMENT WITH
(CONTRACTOR'S NAME) ,(SUBCONTRACTOR'S NAME)
CERTIFIES TO THE CONTRACTOR THAT A DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE WILL BE PROVIDED
FOR THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS
CONTRACT PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (7) OF SUBSECTION (B) OF CODE SECTION
50-24-3. '
ALSO THE UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT HE WILL NOT ENGAGE IN THE
UNLAWFUL MANUFACTURE, SALE, DISTRIBUTION, DISPENSATION, POSSESSION, OR
USE OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OR MARIJUANA DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF
THE CONTRACT.
. .
~
.: =
i
f
"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HAS CAUSED THESE
PRESENTS TO BE EXECUTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF SAID DEPARTMENT, WHO
HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED; AND BY THE MAYOR FOR THE CITY,
WHO HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY,
WHO HAVE HERETO SET THEIR HAND THIS DAY AND YEAR AS SHOWN
BELOW.
. - ~'
*****************************************
FED ID NO. / IRS NO. 5'iJ -~ ~ 0 ~~ ? 4
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *'* * * * '* * * *" * * * * * * *
EXECUTED ON BEHALF OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
THIS
THE
~7~
IVISION DIRECTOR
DATE:
G. ~\-~C\
WITNESS FOR THE DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION:
~~\",~~,
.. -
EXECUTED ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
OF AUGUS
THIS
THE
clWr
BY:
e,v)
W~CIW~
THIS CONTRACT APPROVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL AT A
MEEJlI.NG HELD AT
r:JJn1t!Jf~ BW/uJI Ita
~VJ~nF1919
CONTRACT ID
-' S.P. CODE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
DATE: 04/16/99
PAGE: 1
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
C31654-99-000-0
GRADING, DRAINAGE, BASE AND PLANT MIX PAVING ON 2ND ST
OUTFILL IN AUGUSTA.
. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS DESCRIPTION
l06-1-93-SP
l07-1-93-SP
l08-1-93-SP
l09-1-93-SP
152-1-93-SP
161-2-93-SP
400-2-93-SP
402-1-93-SP
820-1-93-SP
828-1-93-SP
A98-0-00-.8P
A99-0-00-
~
CONTROL OF MATERIALS.
LEGAL REGULATIONS (ENVIRONMENTAL)COUNTY/CITY CONTRACTS
WAIVE PROGRESS SCHEDULE
PARTIAL PAYMENT (CITY/COUNTY CONTRACTS)
FIELD LABORATORY BUILDING
SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENTATION (COUNTY /CITY CONTRAC':'.'~;
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE (COUNTY CONTRACTS)
RECYCLED ASPHALTIC CONCRETE (COUNTY CONTRACTS)
ASPHALT CEMENT ~.
~'b~~!IG-~~~~r{riY\~~i~i - . .~thuL
PLANS (0 ) . . \.J
/
/
-;
.0; 5
~
"
l
CO/C! ENGUSH
May 21, 1998
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
SPECIAL PROVISION
Pt LOP ~5 30 -Sq C~4s)
;i~:
SECTION 106 - CONTROL OF MATERIALS
106.03 SAMPLES, TESTS, CITED SPECIFICATIONS: Delete the second paragraph in this
Subsection and substitute the following:
For work performed 1ll1derSection 400, Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Construction, all materials
shall be inspected and tested by the Hot Mix Producer before incorporation into the Work. All
quality control samples shall be taken and tested by the Hot Mix Producer's designated quality
control technician. Such tests shall be performed at the Hot Mix Producer's expense and in
accordance with the methods of tests established by the Department. Copies of all tests
performed by the Hot Mix Producer shall be furnished to the Engineer and will become a part of
the project records.
At the discretion of the Department, the Hot Mix Producer's quality control tests may be'used as
acceptance tests. The Department will maintain surveillance of the Hot Mix Producer's Quality
Assurance Acceptance Program and shall take samples and conduct tests as necessary to verify
correctness of the Hot Mix Producer's quality control tests and determine. acceptability of
materials and construction. The Hot Mix Producer shall be responsible for the quality of the
construction and materials incorporated therein.
Materials and Research
Revision: May 1, 1994
STATE OF GEORGIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROTATION
SPECIAL PROVISION
SECTION 107 - LEGAL REGULATIONS AND RESPONSmILITY TO THE PUBLIC
DELETE SUB-SECTION 107.23 AS WRITTEN AND SUBSTITUTE THE FOLLOWING:
107.23 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: All environmental considerations
and clearances shall be the responsibility of the County or municipality to meet,
including the requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344).
After July 1, 1991, State funded projects must comply with the requirements of Chapter
16 of Title 12 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, the Georgia Environmental
Policy Act (GEPA), of 1991. In compliance with GEPA, those projects for which
Federal funding is sought, and NEP A compliance is accomplished, are exempt from the
requirements of GEP A.
GEP A requires that environmental documentation be accomplished for County or City
projects if more than 50 percent of the total project cost is funded by a grant of a State
Agency or a grant of more than $250,000.00 is made by the State Agency to the
municipality or County. The "responsible' official of the government agency shall
detennine if a proposed governmental action is a propose,d governmental action which
may significantly adversely affect the quality of the environment",
A. THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS WOULD NOT SIGNIFICANTLY ADVERSELY AFFECt
THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT:
Non-land disturbing activities and mirior land disturbing activities which would not be
anticipated to significantly adversely affect the quality of the environment include the
following 1isL These types of projects funded with state money would not be subject to
environmental assessment of any kind. Hearing procedures outline in GEP A would not
be applicable. . .
~ ~
-;
I." Minor roadway and non-historic bridge projects.
a. Modernization olan existing highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, adding
shoulders, widening a single lane or less in each direction and the addition of a median
within previously disturbed existing right-of-way.
b. Adding auxiliary lanes for localized purposes (weaving, climbing, speed changes, etc.), and
correcting substandard curves and intersections within previously disturbed existing right- .
of-way.
c. Non-historic bridge replacement projects in existing alignment with no detour bridge.
v
2. Lighting, signing, pavement marking, signalization; freeway surveillance and control systems,
and railroad protective devices.
..
3. Safety projects such as grooving, glared screen, safety barriers, energy attenuators, median
barriers, etc.
4. Highway landscaping and landscaping modification, rest area projects and truck weigh
stations within previously disturbed existing right-of-way.
5. Construction of bus shelters and bays within existing right-of-way.
6. Temporary replacement of a highway facility which is commenced immediately after the
occurrence of a natural disaster or catastrophic failure to restore the highway for the health,
welfare, and safety of the public.
B. THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS MAY NOT SIGNIFICANTLY ADVERSELY AFFECT
THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT:
For projects which will cause land disturbance and for which there is no anticipation that
the project may significantly adversely affect the quality of the environment, certain
studies will be undertaken. These studies would serve to document whether or not the
County or municipality should anticipate that a project might significantly adversely
affect the quality of the environment. Documentation of the studies will be
accomplished through the use of the "GEP A Investigation Studies" checklist.
The types of p'rojects, which would fall under the category, would include:
1. Bridge replacement projects on new location of with a detour bridge, where there are no
significant adverse impacts to"historic or archaeological resources, no involvement with
Federally listed threatened and endang~red species and no significant adverse impact to
wetlands.
2. Passing lanes, median additions and widening projects, where there are no significant adverse
impacts to historic or archaeological resources, no involvement with Federally listed
threatened and endangered species and no significant adverse impact.to wetlands.
3. Safety and intersection improvements where there .are no significant adverse impacts to
historic or archaeological resources, no involvement with Federally listed threatened and
. endangered species and no significant adverse impact to wetlands.
4. Rest area projects and truck weigh stations with no purchase of additional right-of-way.
2
5. New location projects where there are no significant adverse impacts to historic or
archaeological resources, no involvement with Federally listed threatened and endangered
species and no significant adverse impact to wetlands.
If studies demonstrate that the project will not significantly adversely affect the quality of the
. environment, project files will be documented. If studies demonstrate that the project may
significantly adversely affect the quality of the environment, development of an
environmental effects report (EER) will be undertaken along with full GEP A compliance.
C. THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS MAY SIGNIFICANTLY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE
QUALITY OF THE ENVIROMENT:
This category of project may include major widening and new location projects. If such
projects result in a significant adverse effect, an EER shall be prepared.
D. EER PROCEDURE:
GEP A calls for consideration of the "cumulative effect of the proposed government
actions on the environment. . . . . .if a series of proposed government actions are related
either geographically or as logical parts in a chain of contemplated actions". Therefore,
EER's for sections of roadways to be widened or built as new location facilities will
include all projects which are connected geographically or as logical parts in a chain of
contemplated actions.
1. During preparation' of an environmental effect report, the County or Municipality will consult
with and solicit comments from agencies which have jurisdiction by law, special expertise, or
other interest with respect to environmental impacts.
2. In compliance with GEP A the following shall be contained in the EER, at a minimum:
a. Cover sheet;
b. Executive summary;
c.' Alternatives, including the no:-build;
d. Relevant environmental setti~g; Geology, soils, water supply and wetlands, 'floral
fauna, archa~ology/history, economic environment, energy, cultural resources;
e. The environmental impact of the proposed action of the. relevant setting and mitigation
. measures proposed to avoid or minimize adverse impact;
f. Unavoidable adverse environmental effects;
g. Value of short-tenn uses of the ~nvironment and maintenance and enhancement of its
long-tenn ,value;
h. Beneficial aspects, both long tenn and short tenn and its economic advantages and
disadvantages;
3
,-
1. Comments of agencies which have jurisdiction by law, special expertise, or other
interest with respect to any environmental impact or resource;
3. At least 45 days prior to making a decision as to whether to proceed with the undertaking,
publish in the "legal organ of each County in which the proposed governmental action or any
part thereofis to occur, notice that an environmental effects report has been prepared".
4. The County or Municipality shall send a copy of the EER and all other comments to the
Director, EPD.
5. The County or municipality shall make the document available to the public and agencies,
upon request.
6. A public hearing will be held in each affected county if at least 100 residents of the State of
Georgia request one within 30 days of publication in the legal orgari of an affected County.
The responsible official or his designee my hold a public hearing if less than 100 requests are
received. [The county or municipality is not relieved of other State legal requirements of .
public hearings, however.]
. 7. Following the public notice period and/or public hearing, a summary of the document,
comments received and recommendation as to whether to proceed with the action as originally
prepared, to proceed with changes, or not to proceed will be prepared (Notice of Decision).
8. This decision document, when signed by the responsible official, will be sent to the Director,
EPD, and an abbreviated notice of the decision will be published in the legal organ of each
County in which the proposed governmental action or any part thereof is to occur.
9. A copy of the decisio~ document, the EER and public hearing comments (if any) will be sent
to the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT AND
LOCATION and the DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION DIVISION for their files.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE. OF ENVIRONMENT AND LOCATION
3993 A VIATION.CIRCLE
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30336
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIYISION
205 BUTLER STREET, SE
SUITE 1152
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30334
Any mitigation measures identified in the EER will be incorporated into the final project
plans.
Office of State Aid
4
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
SPECIAL PROVISION
FIRST USE 1993 SPECIFICATIONS
JULY 1, 1993
Section 108 - Prosecution and Progress
For this project the progress schedule required by Subsection 108.03, need not be
submitted.
August 7,1995
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORIA
SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION
SECTION 109 - MEASUREMENT & PAYMENT (CITY/COUNTY CONTRACTS)
109.07 PARTIAL PAYMENTS: Retain as written except as follows:
A. GENERAL: Delete "At the end of each calendar month" ---------and substitute "On the 10th
day of each calendar monthm---".
-;
Office of State Aid
\ '
May 21, 1998
~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
SP~CIAL PROVISION
PRLO P ~S30 _5(1 {~45)
SECTION 152 - FIELD LABORATORY BUILDING
152.03 Plant Laboratory Buildings: D~lete Items 3, 4, and 5 and substitute the following:
ITEM 3: 1 Each - Computer, IBM or IBM Compatible
540 Megabyte Hard Disk Drive (Minimum)
- 3 1/2 inch High Density Floppy Disk Drive
- CD-ROM Drive (4X Minimum)
Windows 95 Operating System
- Mouse
Modem 9600 Baud (Minimum)
1 Parallel and 2 Serial Ports
16 Megabyte Random Access Memory Expandable to at Least 32
Meg~bytes
- VGA Monitor
- 486 Microprocessor Operating at 33 Megahertz (Minimum)
ITEM 4: '1 Each - Printer (Desk Jet HP Letter quality printer)
Materials and Research
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA TION
STATE OF GEORGIA
SPECIAL PROVISION
FIRST USE 1993 SPECIFICATIONS
JUL Y 1, 1993
Section 161 - Control of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Retain as written and add the following:
It shall be the responsibility of the county or city to meet the requirements of Chapter 7 of
Title 12 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, the Erosion and Sedimentation Act of
1975, as currently amended.
~
August 4, 1998
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
."
SPECIAL PROVISION
(For "Off-System" Contracts Only)
\':,
'; ~~,
Pe (0 P ~530 -5q(~4.S)
SECTION 400 - HOT:MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
400.02 MATERIALS: Delete Items H. and J. and substitute the following:
H. Bituminous Tack Coat:
Asphalt Cement Grade PG 58-22, PG 64-22, PG 67-22
820.01
400.05.C.4: LEVELING COURSE: Delete second paragraph and substitute the following:
MixtUres for leveling courses shall meet the requirements of the approved Job Mix Formula as
defined in Subsection 400.06 and all appropriate requirements of Section 828 and will be subject
to Acceptance as stated in Subsection 400.07.A.
TABLE 400.0S.C.4.a.: PATCHING AND LEVELING: Delete and substitute the following:
'Thickness
Rate of Spread
Type of Mix
Up to 3/4"
3/4" to 1 1/2"
1 1/2" to 2"
2" to 3"
Over 3"
Up to 85 lbs./s.y.
85 lbs./s.y. to 165 lbs./s.y.
165 lbs./s.y. to 220 lbs./s.y~
220 lbs./s.y. to 330 lbs./s.y.
Over 330 lbs./s.y.
4.75 mm Mix or 9.5 nun Superpave
9.5 mm Superpave
12.5 mm Sliperpave
19 mm Superpave
25 mm Superpave or 37.5 mm Superpave
400.05.D.1. TIDCKNESS OF LAYERS: I?elete and substitute the following:
Mix Type
Minimum
Layer
Thickness
Maximum
L~yer
Thickness
Maximum
Total
Thickness
37.5 mm Superpave
25 mm Superpave
. 19 mm Superpave
12.5 mm Superpave
9.5 rom Superpave
4.75 rom Mix
3" 5"*
3" 5"*
1 3/4" . 3"*
1 3/8" 2"
7/8" (85 Ib/s.y.) I 1/2"-
3/4" (80 lb.ls.y.) 1 1/8"
6"
4"
2"
* On trench widening, which is defined as widening no more than four feet in width, allow
up to 6" per lift.
~
(.
PRLOP 5'530 51 (;?4S)
400.0S.D.3. ROLLING OPERATION: Delete the last sentence and add the following:
. Pneumatic-Tired rollers shall be used in conjunction with breakdown rollers on all surface and
subsurface courses except that pneumatic-tired rollers may be excluded at the discretion of the
Engineer when polymer modified asphalt is used in the Asphaltic Concrete mixtures.
1'..
.:l,
. : ~i'
'..',
-;-
400.0S.E. CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS: Delete and substitute the fol!owing:
':(
Plant production, transportation, and paVing operations shall be so coordinated that a uniform
continuity of operation is maintained. If spreading operations are interrupted, the Engineer may
require that a transverse joint be constructed any time the mixture immediately behind the paver
screed cools to less than 2500 F.
:~:
400.0S.F.: CONSTRUCTION OF CONTROL STRIPS AND . DETERMINATION . OF
TARGET DENSITY: Delete and substitute the following:
Construction of control strips will not be requir~d and 96% of Laboratory Density shall be use~
to . control compaction or if job conditions warrant, the Engineer may' establish a maximum
practical density.
For Asphaltic Concrete with a plan spread rate of 125 Ibs.lyds.2 or less, density tests .will not be
required. These courses shall be compacted as follows:
1. COMPACTION EQUlPMENT: The compaction equipment must be in good
mechanical condition and capable of compacting the mixture. The number, type,
size, operation, and condition of the compaction equipment shall be subject to the
approval of the Engineer. A minimum of the following equipment shall be required:
a. One steel wheel breakdown roller weighing at least 10 tons or vibratory roller
operating at low amplitude and at a minimum frequency of 47 Hz.
b. One rubber tire roller weighing at least 8 tons or exerting at least 80 lbs.l in.2
contact pressure.
c; One' steel wheel finishing roller weighing at least 8 tons or vibratory roller
operating in static mode.
::ji
=
2. ROLLING OPERATION: Rolling shall be started as close behind the spreader as
possible without excessiv~ distortion of the mix and shall be continued until roller
marks are no longer visible. A minimum rolling pattern shall consist of 2 coverages
. With the breakdown roller, 6 coverages with the Pneumatic-Tired roller, and 2'
coverages with the steel wheel finish roller.
/"
400.0S.G.: MIXTURE NOT REQUnuNG CONTROL STRIPS: Delete this Subsection.
400.06.A.8. Delete and substitute the following:
peLDP 8 530 __Sq( d45)
-: ~
8. The results of a design study providing the necessary information to conform to the
. appropriate requirements of Section 828. The Hot Mix Producer shall be responsible for all
asphaltic concrete mix designs. A period of two weeks from the date batched materials are
received shall be allowed for mix design verification by the Office of Materials and
Research.
~
..::
lL~
.~j
.-';
All proposed Job Mix Formulas shall be submitted for approval at least two weeks prior to
beginning mixing operations. No Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete work shall be started nor
shall any mixture be' accepted until the Engineer has approved a Job Mix Formula for the
mixture to be used.
~
r.
.';
400.07. ACCEPTANCE PLANS: Delete all references to pay adjustments and pay factors. In
addition, delete 400.07.A, Gradation and Asphalt Cement Content, and substitute the following:
A. HOT MIX PRODUCER ACCREDITATION OF MATERIALS SAMPLING AND
TESTING OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE: Asphaltic. Concrete Mixture shall be randomly
sampled and tested by the Hot Mix Producer orHot Mix Producer's Representative. In addition,
these tests results may be used for Acceptance on a Lot basis. Failure to comply with the ,
requirements listed herein may subject the plant facility to removal from the list of approved Hot
Mix Asphaltic Concrete Plants (QPL-45).
A Lot shall consist of the number of tons of Asphaltic Concrete produced and placed each
production day; however, if this production is less than 500 tons, or its square yard equivalent, it
may be incorporated in the next working day's production. In the event the final day's
production is insufficient to constitute a Lot, it may be included in the Lot for the previous day's
run, or at the discretion of the Engineer, may be treated as a separate Lot with a corresponding
lower number of tests.
1. QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM: This Quality Control Program allows the
Department to accept the Hot Mix Producer's quality control tests as Acceptance
Tests for Asphaltic Concrete mixtures. The Hot Mix Producer's Quality Control
Program as established in S.O.P. 27, "QUality Assurance for Hot Mix Asphaltic
Concrete Plants in Georgia," shall include, but not be limited to:
~
a. The assignment of all -quality control ,..esponsibilities to specifically named
individuals who have been duly certified by the Office of Materials and Research.
b.Provisions for prompt implementation of control and corrective measures.
~
c. Provisions for liaison with the Project Manager, Bitwninous Construction
Engineer and Testing Management Operations Supervisor at all times. The Hot
Mix Producer shall provide at least one day's notice prior to beginning
production, or prior to resuming production if operations have been temporarily
suspended.
d. Provisions for reporting daily through Office of Materials and Research computer
Bulletin Board Service (BBS) the test results for extractions, lime checks, and
stripping tests.
,.
PfLOP ?IS 30-Sf C 24s)
Other tests, checks, calibrations, etc. will be reported on a form developed by the
Hot Mix Producer and shall become a part of the project records. .
The Quality Control Program shall be submitted to the Office of Materials and
Research for initial approval. Thereafter, the Quality Control Program shall be
included as part of the certification in the semiannual Plant Inspection Report.
!.\
"
'}':
~
2. CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: The Office of Materials and Research will
certify the Hot Mix Producer's Laboratory and testing equipment to assure that the
equipment to be used is' accurate and meets Departmental testing standards.
Laboratories which participate in and maintain AASHTO Accreditation for testing
Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures will be acceptable for certification by the Department
provided other contract requirements are met.
;..i
~~
t
~
r..=
ti
l~
The designated Quality Control personnel must be certified by the Office of Materials
and Research prior to commencement of work. Th~re are two certification Levels for
Quality Control Technicians. To become a certified Level 1- Quality Control
Technician (QCT), such persons must be able to demonstrate that they are competent
in performing the process control and acceptance tests and procedures related to Hot
Mix Asphaltic Concrete production. The Level 2-QCT shall, in addition to Level 1
requirements, be capable of and responsible for making process control adjustments.
The Engineer shall be notified in writing of any change in Quality Control personnel.
The Hot Mix Producer shall have at least one designated QCT person at the plant at
all times except when daily total weight for all mix types is to be greater than 250
tons. If daily production for all mix types of the plant is 250 tons or less, the QCT
may be responsible for conducting tests at up to two plants, subject to random number
selection. In addition, the Hot Mix Producer is also required to have available, either
at the plant site or within immediate contact by phone or radio, a LeveI2-QCT person
responsible for making prompt process control adjustments as necessary to correct the
nux.
!
3. SAMPLING, TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: Mixtures shall be
randomly sampled according to GDT -73 (Method C) and tested by the - QCT on a Lot
basis at a minimum frequency of one test per 500 tons. A copy of the computer
generated random sampling data.shall be maintained as a part of the project records.
The Hot Mix Producer's QCT shall perform all Sampling and Inspection duties in
accordance with GSP-21. All sample containers, e,:,-tractants, forms, diaries and other
supplies shall be fumished by the Hot Mix Producer and are subject to approval of the
Engineer.
~
The Hot Mix Producer's QCT shall perform extraction or ignition (GDT-83 or GDT-
125), or digital print-out for asphalt cement content, and gradation analysis (GDT-38)
of samples of the mixture produced each day and sampled in accordance With GSP-
15. The extracted aggregate shall be properly labeled, stored in a suitable container
and secured in a protected environment. If these samples are not procured by the
Department within three working days, they may be discarded. If the ignition oven is
used, a printout of sample weights shall become a part of the project records.
-.
P e LD P gS 30 _5'1 ( ,) 4 s)
'1.'
':,;
. The Hot Mix Producer shall maintain a Process Control Flow chart for each sieve
specified on the Job Mix Formula and including the percent asphalt cement content.
Such chart shall include a graph plot of the deviations from the Job Mix Formula
for each test as well as . the allowable range based on the Mixture Control
Tolerances specified in Section 828.
;q
If an Acceptance test result is outside Mixture Control Tolerances specified in
Section 828, the QCT shall immediately notify the Testing Management Operations
Supervisor of results. The Level '2-QCT shall determine if a plant adjustment is
needed and im.n:lediately run a Process Control sample. If the Process Control sample
is also out of Mixture Control Tolerances, an immediate plant adjustment shall be
required and additional Process Control samples shall be taken as necessary to assure
the corrective action taken was appropriate to control the mix.
?~,
~it
~1
.j~
M
J.
{~
,',.
. .~;:
If the Hot Mix Producer's QCT obtains 2 consecutive Acceptance samples out of the
Mixture Control Tolerances specified in Section 828, production shall stop
immediately. Mixture already in storage which deviates no more than 10% in
gradation and no more than 0.7% in asphalt cement content from the Job Mix
Formula may be transported to and placed on the project subject to visual inspection
and density and smoothness requirements. Any mixture remaining in surge bins or
silos shall be rejected and disposed of at the Hot Mix Producer's expense if a sample
representative of the mixture deviates more than 10% in gradation or more than 0.7%
in asphalt cement content from the Job Mix Formula. A plant correction shall be
made prior to resuming production. Upon restarting production, no mixture shall be
transported to the project before test results of a Process Control sample from the
mixture indicate that quality control of the mixture has been restored by meeting
Mixture Control Tolerances. Any mixture produced at initial restarting that does not
meet Mixture Control tolerances shall be rejected. .
The QCT shall measure the -temperature of the mixture and record the results on the
load ticket each time a sample is taken. The respective load ticket shall also be signed
by theQCT for each load from which a sample is taken.
When hydrated lime is to be included in. the mixture, calibration of the lime system
. shall be checked for accuracy a minimum o(twice weekly during production and the
results of these calibration checks shall be posted at the plant -for review.
Additionally, records of materials (Asphalt Cement, Aggregates, Hydrated Lime, etc.)
invoices shall be made available upon request.
1".
4~ . COMPARATIVE AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM: Periodic
comparative testing will be required of each QCT and will be coordinated by the
Department to monitor consistency of equipment and test procedures. In addition, the
Department will take independent samples to monitor the Hot Mix Producer's Quality .
. Control Program: For clarification, Department samples taken from opposite quarters
of material sampled by the Hot Mix Producer are defined as Comparison Samples.
Other independent samples which are taken by the Department from . material
produced during the same Lot are defined as Quality Assurance samples. This
Program is further defined as follows:
.
.
, 51
PRLoP g-s30 - (;(45)
a. Comparison Sampling and Testing: During the quartering process of Hot MiX
samples, the opposite quarters from the test specimen shall be labeled by the QCT
and retained for Department comparison testing. In addition, the remaining
material removed from the total sample shall be labeled and retained for possible
Referee testing. These samples shall be stored in a suitable container and secured
in a protected environment. If the Hot Mix Producer's Acceptance Test results
are within Mixture Contiol Tolerances and if the Department does not procure
these retained s~ples. within three working days of the. represented mix being
produced, these samples may be discarded.
v:.
t.:
. ;1.:
The Department will test comparison samples on a random basis at a frequency
deemed necessary to assure that the Hot Mix Producer's testing techniques are
yielding accurate results. Results of Department tests ~ll be compared to the
respective Hot Mix Producer's Acceptance tests. The maximum tolerance
allowed for Comparison Samples as defined above shall be as follows:
MAXIMUM DIFFERENCE
SIEVE SIZE
25mm
19mm
12.5 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
2.36 mm
75 JlIIl
A.C.
SURFACE
3.5%
3.5%
2.5%
2.0%
0.4%
SUBSURFACE
5.0%
5.0%
4.0%
4.0%
3.5%
3.0%
2.0%
0.5%
:.
If Comparison tests are Within these tolerances, production may continue and at
the discretion of the Engineer, the Hot Mix Producer's tests can be used as the
acceptance tests for the affected Lot. If test results are not within these tolerances,
the corresponding Referee Samples shall be tested by another Departmental
Technician and compared to the tolerance for Comparison Samples as given
above. If test Results of Referee Samples, when compared to the' respective
QCT's s8.m.ple, are within. th~se tolerances, the Hot Mix Producer's tests can be
used as Acceptance Tests for the effected Lot. If tests results are not within these
tolerances, the Hot Mix Producer's Quality Control methods shall be reviewed by
the Office of Materials and Research and a thorough investigation will be made if
deemed necessary; ,
...J~
~
b. QualitY Assurance Sampling' ~d .Testing: The Department will take samples for
the purpose of mohitoring -. .the effectiveness of the Hot Mix Producer's.
Quality Control Program; These samples may be obtained from the same load as
QCT samples were taken or other loads at the plant or roadway, or samples
obtained immediately behind the spreader and prior to compaction. The samples
wiil be tested and analyzed by. the Department in accordance with 'standard
procedures.
,..
I:'
..
Pi! lOP gS"30 5i( cX.4-~
The Department shall randomly take . and test a mmnnum of two Quality
Assurance (QA) samples from each five days or five Lots of production
regardless of mix type or number of projects to assure that the mixture is beirig
adequately controlled and accurately sampled and tested.
i"
~!
I;
'&
~
The maximum tolerance for QA samples as defined above, when compared to the
Job Mix Formula, shall be the same as the Mixture Control Tolerances as outlined
in Section 828. If test results are not within these tolerances, the Department may
take another sample from' the respective mix. If tests results of the additional
sample are within these tolerances, production may continue. If test results of the
additional sample are not within these tolerances, production may continue but the
Department will investigate by taking random samples from throughout the Lot in
accordance with Subsection 400.07.F. These samples shall be used for
. Acceptance and the Hot Mix Producer QCT test results for the respective Lot will
not be included in the Lot calculations.
Should the Engineer determine that Quality Control requirements are not being
met or that unsatisfactory results are being obtained, prompt corrective action
shall be taken by the Hot Mix Producer. Failure to take prompt corrective action
will be cause for the Engineer to discontinue acceptance of the mix. If the
Engineer determines that any material is unac'ceptable to leave in place, the
material shall be removed and replaced at the Hot Mix Producer's expense. Any
test results for materials not used in the Work shall not be included in the
calculations for Lot Acceptance.
If it is determined by the Department that the QCT has not followed procedures
specified in GSP.:.21 or has provided erroneous information, his or her
certification may be withdrawn, and the Hot Mix Producer may be subject to
punitive or legal . action. Technicians who lose their certification due to'
falsification of test data wiUnot be eligible for re-certification in the future unless
approved by the State Materials and Research Engineer.. In-place material
represented by unacceptable tests will. be evaluated by cores in accordance with
Subsection 400.07.F. These core samples shall be used for acceptance.
5. GRADATION AND ASPHALT CEl\.1ENT CONTENT: Quality Acceptance of the
mixture will be based upon the mean of the deviations from the Job Mix Formula for
control sieves and asphalt cement content of the specified number of test results per
Lot. This mean will be determined by averaging the actual numeric value of the
individual deviations from the Job Mix Formula, disregarding whether the deviations
are positive or negative amounts.. The samples shall be taken randomly in
accordance with GDT-73. In the event that the designated random load is not
sampled, or less than. the specified number of samples are taken, the. Hot Mix
Producer shall take at least two representative six inch cores from the roadway (to
assure adequate sample size). These cores shall be taken from the area where the
appropriate random load was placed, or for each portion of mix that was not sampled,
and acceptance will be based on the mean of the deviations from the Job Mix
Formula of the total number of tests nul.
peLOp 8 :> 30 j1 ( ;<4-5);:
For asphalt cement content only, on plants with digital recorders, digital printouts of
liquid asphalt cement weights may be substituted in lieu of an extraction test. The
asphalt cement cOIitent .shall be calculated from the ticket representing the mixture
tested for gradation. . The asphalt cement content calcUlated from each ticket will be
considered a test. .
::"
Iii
if:
. ~.
The control sieves used in Quality Acceptance for the various types' of mix are as
indicated below:
~
,.,1
TABLE 400.07.A
MIX TYPE
MIXTURE CONTROL .
37.5 mm Superpave
25 mm, 2.36 mm Sieves and Asph~lt Cement .
25 mm Superpave,
19 mm Superpave
12.5 mm, 2.36 mm Sieves and Asphalt Cement
12.5 mm Superpave
9.5 mm, 2.36 mm Sieves and Asphalt Cement
9.5 nun Superpave
4.75 nun, 2.36 mm Sieves and Asphalt Cement
4.75 mmMix
2.36 mm Sieve and Asphalt Cement
400.07B.: COMPACTION: Delete this Subsection and substitute the following:
The compaction of the mixture as determined by either GDT-39, or GDT-59, will be accepted in
Lots as defined in Subsection 400.07.A. and shall be within the same Lot boundaries as the
mixture acceptance.
The mean density of the pavement placed within .each' Lot will be calculated by averaging the
results. of tests run on randomly. selected sites in that Lot. The random sites shill be selected
using GDT-73.
400.07.C.: SURFACE TOLERANCE: Delete this Subsection and substitute the following:
~:
All paving shall be subject to visual and straightedge inspection during construction operations
and thereafter prior to final acceptance. A 10 foot straightedge shall be retained in the vicinity of
. the paving. operation at all times. for the purpose of measuring surface irregularities on all
courses. The straightedge and labor for its use shall be provided by ~e Hot Mix Producer. The
surface of base, intermediate, and surface .courses' shall be inspected with the straightedge as
necessary to detect irregularities. All irregul~ties in excess of 3/16 inch in 10 feet for base,
intermediate, and surface courses shall be corrected. Irregularities such as rippling, tearing, or
pulling which in the judgment of the Engineer indicate a continuing problem in equipment,
mixture, or operating technique' shaU not be permitted to recur and the paving operation shall be
stopped unless appropriate steps are taken by the Hot Mix Producer to correctthe problem.
or:
PR{oP ''i)S30.?l (o<1S)
400.07.D.: MATERIALS PRODUCED AND PLACED DURING ADJUSTMENT
PERIOD: Delete this Subsection.
400.07.F REEVALUATION OF'LOTS: Add the following to the first paragraph:
Re-evaluation of Lots and acceptance will be base4 on Department evaluations. All costs of
these evaluations shall be at the Hot'Mix Producer's expense. . .
~;
May 21, 1998
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
:u..
;,"~"
":;.
SPECIAL PROVISION
pelot ~30-5q (:1-45)
SECTION 402 - HOT MlX RECYCLED ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
,..
..~ I
402.02.A.RAP MATERIAL: Delete the next to last paragraph and substitute the following:
RAP containing either local sand or alluvial gravel will not be allowed in mixtures used on
interstate projects except for shoulder construction. When used in shoulder construction, the use
of RAP containing either local sand or alluvial gravel shall be limited such that the sand or
gravel makes up no more than 20% of the total aggregate portion of the mix. When used in
mainline and ramp construction of non-interstate projects, the percentage of RAP containing
alluvial gravel sha,ll be limited such that the gravel makes up no more than' 5%. of the total
aggregate portion of the mix. The. amount of local sand in RAP shall be considered when
determining the local sand portion allowed in the total mix as specified in Section 828.
Where Pay Items specify that Group II only aggregate is to be used, RAP which consists
primarily of Group II aggregate, but contains some Group I aggregate shall be limited such that
the Group I aggregate makes up no. more than 5% of the total aggregate portion of the mix.
When a Blend I mix is specified, any Group I aggregate in the RAP shall be considered when
determining the Group I portion allowed in the total mix as specified in Section 828. The
percentage of local sand, alluvial gravel, and; Group I aggregate in the RAP will be determined
through petrographic analysis or available records.
:::
402.02.C. RECYCLED MlXTURE: Delete and substitute the following:
The recycled mixture shall be a homogeneous mixture of RAP material, virgin aggregate and
neat asphalt cement. Further, the mixture shall be appropriately treated with an approved anti-
stripping agent, either a heat stable anti-stripping additive or hydrated lime. The agent chosen
shall be at the Hot Mix Producer's' discretion except where noted in the Pay Item Designation.
The mixture shall conform to an approved mixture design meeting the requirements outlined in
. Section 828. Where hydrated lime is used, it shall be added at 'a rate of 1.0 percent of the virgin
aggregate portion plus 0.5 percent of the aggregate in the RAP portion of the mixture. Where
heat stable anti-strip additive is used, it shall be added at a rate of 0.5 percent of the neat asphalt
cement added to the mixture. .
,.
"
PeLoNs s3o-1I (;l45)
402.05 PAYMENT: Add the following:
Item No. 402 Recycled Asphaltic Concrete, ~ Superpave, Group-Blend,
Including Bituminous Material.... . .. . ...... .. . ................... ... . . ................. per Ton
..
Item No. 402 Recycled Asphaltic Concrete, ~ Superpave,Group-Blend,
Including Bituminous Material and Hydrated Lime ............................. per Ton
Item No. 402 Recycled Asphaltic Concrete, ~ Superpave, Group-Blend.
Including Polymer~Modified Bituminous Material and Hydrated Lime.... per Ton
Item No. 402 _Inches Recycled Asphaitic Concrete, ~ Superpave,
Group-Blend, Including Bituminous Material.. ........................... per Square Yard
Item No. 402 _Inches RecycledAsphaltic Concrete, ~ Superpave,
Group-Blend, Including Bituminous Material
and Hydrated Lime.. ..................................................................... per Square Yard
Item No. 402 . Inches Recycled Asphaltic Concrete, ~ Superpave,
. - .
Group-Blend, Including Polymer-Modified Bituminous Material
and Hydrated Lime ......................................................................... per Square Yard
Materials and Research
.'
May 21, 1998 '
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
,
';,.:.
".:.,
SPECIAL PROVISION
Pf,wP ~536 -51(;445)
SECTION 820 - ASPHALT CEMENT
Delete and substitute the following:
820.01 SUPERPA VE ASPHALT BINDER: This Section covers asphalt cements which have
been prepared from crude petroleum by suitable methods. The asphalt cements shall be
homogenous, free from water and shall not foam when heated to 1750 C. Blending of asphalt
cements to produce a specified performance grade shall result in a uniform, homogenous blend .
with no separation. The neat asphalt cement proposed for use in Asphaltic Concrete shall meet
the following requirements for PG 64-22 or PG 67-22 and be production materials ("straight-
run") that have not been "air-blown" to achieve the performance grade (pG). PG 58-22 may be
used as. Bituminous Tack Coat or in Bituminous Surface Treatment. Only StYrene-Butadiene-
Styrene (SBS) or Styrene-Butadiene (SB) shall be added to the neat asphalt cement, if needed, to
produce a binder,that complies with the following requirements for PG 76-22.
1. Test Requirements
TEST AND METHOD ORIGINAL
TEST TEMPERATURE BINDER . RESIDUE OF BINDER AFTER:
PG 'PG PG PG Rolling Thin-Film Pressure Aging
. 58-22 64-22 67-22 76-22 Oven AASHTO: TP5 AASHTO: PP-l
FlaSh Point,
AASHTO: T -48 MiD. 2300 C
Viscosity (a), 3Pa-S
AASHTO:TP-48 Max. 1350 C (3000CP)
Mass Loss (%), Max. . .
AASHTO: T-240 (b) 0.5
Dynamic Shear, 580 C 640 C 670 C 760 C ~ 1.0 kPa ~ 2.2 kPa
G*/sinS, AASHTO: Phase
TP5, 10 Rad/Sec Angle < 75 deg.
Dissipated Energy,
Dynamic Shear, . 25OC. ~ 5000 kPa
G*sinS, AASHTO:
TP5, 10 Rad/Sec
Creep Stiffness (c), S ~ 300,000 kPa
60 sec. AASHTO TPl _120 C m > 0,300
Direct Tension. 1.0 -
mmlmin. AASHTO: - 120 C . Report
TP3, Failure Strain
,
5Cf )
pR(o P '[3530- (~4S
820.01 (Continued)
';/';
'!J':
(a) lbis. requirement may be waived at the discretion of the Department if the
supplier warrants that the asphalt binder can be adequately pumped and mixed at
temperatures that meet all applicable safety standards.
(b) Heat loss by AASHTO: T -179 may be accepted in lieu of mass loss by AASHTO:
I T-240.
(c) If the creep stiffness is below 300,000 kPa, the direct tension test is not required.
If the creep stiffuess is ?:. 300,000 kPa, the Direct Tension Failure Strain value
shall be' reported. The m-value requirement shall be satisfied in either case.
. \
If modification is required, the composite materials shall be thoroughly blended at the
supply facility prior to being loaded into the transport vehicle. All blending procedures,
formulation, and operations shall be approved by the Office of Materials and Research.
. 2. Certification: Certified test results of laboratory blends for proposed PG asphalts shall
be provided by a certified laboratory, approved by the Office of Materials and Research,
for each specification characteristic of the asphalt cement proposed for shipment. The
certified r~sults shall be provided to the State Materials and Research Engineer in
compliance with Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)-4.
In the event there is reason to suspect a sample will be outside specification limits, the
State Materials and Research Engineer may interrupt the production until test results are
known.
.
Materials and Research
May 21, 1998
~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
'i
!":,
:i.
f~~'
SPECIAL PROVISION
PRLOP t530 -6QC()4S')
. SECTION 828 ~ HOT MIX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MIXTURES
::,
Delete and substitute the following:
828.01 DESCRIPTION: This specification covers the requirements that are applicable to all
Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures. Materials used in the preparation of these mixtures shall
be approved by the Engineer prior to incorporatmg in the Wode. This work consists of
producing and constructing one or more . courses of hot mix asphalt pavement. Superpave mixes
shall be designed in accordance with the Superpave System for Volumetric Design (AASHTO
TP4 and AASHTO PP2) to meet test properties as shown unless otherwise stated herein.
All mixtures are designated baSed on the Nominal Maximum Sieve Size as defined m
Subsection 828.02 and shall conform to the following unless otherwise stated herein:
A. The Contract Pay Item will specify the aggregate group, or blend, where applicable.
See Subsection 828.04 for explanation of aggregate groups and blends.
. B. The percent finer than 75Jlm will be determined in accordance with GDT-2, ~temate
A or B.
C. Mixture Control Tolerances are based on the results of individual tests and are for mix
uniformity control purposes only.
D. Group I or Group II aggregate. or. a blend of both may be used for patching or leveling.
Mixes for patching and leveling are listed in Subsections 828.02 and 828.03.
E. Hydrated lime shall be included in all paving courses except where noted. The lime
shall be added at a minimum rate of one percent of the total dry aggregate weight. In
recycled mixtures, lime shall be added at a minimum rate of one percent of the virgin
aggregate portion plus a minimum of 0.5 percent of the aggregate in the Reclaimed
. Asphalt Pavement (RAP) portion of the mixture. Additional lime, as well as an
approved heat stable. anti-stripping additive, which . meets requirements of
Subsection 831.04, may be required in a.tiy particular mixture when necessary for
satisfaction of governing Specification requirements. No additional payment will be
made by the Department for any such required additional materials.
~~~
:f,
",
,. .
828.01 (Continued)
(flOP g-S3D-1l {J4S]
?
{:
-
i
F. On projects designated at Mix Design Level A, as designated in the project Plans or
project General Notes, the Asphalt Cement (AC) used in all mixtures may, at the Hot
Mix Producer's discretion, include an approved heat stable anti-stripping additive,
which meets requirements of Subsection 831.04, in lieu of hydrated lime unless noted
.otherwise. The addition rate will be a minimum of 0.5 percent of the AG portion.
When a heat stable anti-stripping additive is used in these mixes in li~u of hydrated
lime, the minimum tensile splitting ratio will be 0:4 for Asphaltic Concrete 4.75 mm
mix and 0.6 for all other Asphaltic concrete mixtures. .
G. Asphalt Cement used in production of asphaltic concrete mixtures shall meet the
requirements of Subsection 820.01. Asphalt Cement used in the production of these
miXtures shall meet requirements of Subsection 820.01. The AC used in all mixtures
shall be PG 67-22 with the following exceptions:
a. For projects designated at Mix Design Level A, as designated in the project Plans
or project General Notes, PG 64-22 may be used at the discretion of the Hot Mix
Producer,
b. For mixtures which utilize Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP), the AC grade to
be used will be determined by the Engineer.
c. AC meeting requirements of PG 76-22 shall be used in the top dense-graded
surface course, excluding shoulder construction, for projects or portions of a
project designed at Level C or D, as designated in the project Plans or project
General Notes.
H. Local sand, not to exceed 20% of the total aggregate weight, may be used as an
ingredient in all Asphaltic Concrete mixtures placed on the mainline and ramps of non-
interstate routes designed at Mix Design Level A. On non-interstate projects designed
at Mix Design Level B, C, or D, as designated in the project Plans or project General
Notes, the use of local s~d shall be limited to Asphaltic Concrete 37.5 mm Superpave
and 25 mm Superpave mixtures only. and shall not exceed 20% of the total aggregate
. weight. However, up to 20% local sand, based on the total aggregate weight; may be
. allowed as an ingredient in' all Asphaltic Concrete mixtures used. for . shoulder
construction unless specified otherwise.
828.01 (Continued)
. I
pelot gS3() j'l(;(4S)
I. When allowed, local sand shall meet the following gradation requirements:
..
GRADING REQUIREMENTS
% Passing 12.5 mm Sieve 100
% Passing 9.5 mm Sieve 90-100
% Passing 4.75 mm Sieve 80-100
% Passing 2.36 mm Sieve . 60-100
% Passing 300J.l.m Sieve 12-70
% Passing 7~ J.l.m Sieve 2-15
The clay content of local sand shall be no more than 7%. Local sand shall also be free of clay lumps as
determined by AASHTO: T 112.
828.02 SUPERPA VE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MIXTURES
A. Gradation Requirements:
Superpave utilizes the FHW A 0.45 Power gradation chart to. define permissible
gradations.. This chart uses a unique graphing technique to judge the cumulative
particle size distribution of a blend. The ordinate (y axis) of the chart is percent
passing, ranging from zero to one hundred percent. The abscissa (x axis) is an
arithmetic scale of sieve size opening in microns raised to the 0.45 power.
Superpave defines nominal maximum sieve size and maximum sieve size as follows:
. Nominal Maximum Sieve Size: One standard sieve size larger than the first sieve to
retain more than ten percent (10.0%).
Maximum Sieve Size: One standard sieve size larger than the nominal maximum
size.
;;1
~
The 0.45 power maximwi:J. density line is drawn from the origin to one hundred percent
(100.0%) passing the maximum sieve size. Gradation control limits are based upon the
nominal maximum size. There is also a "restricted zOne," that is an area on either side
of the maximum density line generally startfug at the 2.36 mm sieve and extending to
the 0.30 mm (300 /lm) sieve. Ris recommended that gradations be developed avoiding
the restricted zone. The Office of Materials and Research may approve use of mixtures
which have gradations that enter the restricted zone provided the Hot Mix Producer
supplies acceptable test results of special proof-testing requirements as' described in
Subsection 828.05, Rutting Susceptibility Testing.
j"
~
~;;
;~
.
.
~
. -q
PE[OPgS30 j C;;24s~\
828.02 (Continued)
TABLE 828.02.A.1.
JOB MIX FORMULA AND DESIGN LIMITS
MIXTURE
CONTROL ASPHALTIC 9.5mm 12.5 mm 19mm 25mm 37.5 mm
TOLERANCE CONCRETE Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave Superpave
,
Grading
Requirements Percent Passing
:1:0.0 50 mm Sieve 100
:l:6~O . 37.5 mm Sieve 100* 90-100
:1:6.0 25.0 mm Sieve 100* 90-100 15-90
:1:6.0 19.0' rom Sieve' 100* 90-100
:1:6.0 12.5 rom Sieve 100* 90-100 23-90 19-90
:1:5.6 9.5 mm Sieve 90-100 28-90
:1:5.6 4.75 rom' Sieve 32-90
:1:4.6 2.36 rom Sieve 32-67 28-58 . 23-49 19-45 15-41
:1:2.0 75 \..Lm Sieve 2-10 . 2-10 2-8 1-7 0-6
Recommended Restricted Zone
4.75 rom Sieve 39.5 34.7
2.36 rom Sieve 47.2 39.1 34.6 26.8-30.8 23.3-27.3
1.18 mm Sieve 31.6-37.6 25.6-31.6 22.3-28.3 18.1-24.1 15.5-21.5
600 \..LID Sieve 23.5-27.5 19.1-23.1 16.7-20.7 13.6-17.6 11.7-15.7
" 300 /lID Sieve 18.7 15.5 13.7 11.4 10.0
* Mixture Control Tolerance not applicable to this sieve for this mix.
Note: When plotted on the 0.45 powetgradation chart, the mixture target gradation shall pass
below the restricted zone for projects designed at Level B, C, or D as designated in the
project PlanS or project General Notes, unless Rutting Susceptibility testing in
Subsection 828.05 indicates the mix is resistant to rutting.
The Mixture Control Tolerance for asphalt content shall be:t 0.4%.
:;i;
:r!
~i'
df
:t:
.'
828.02 (Continued)
Pi LO P ~ 530 -,'lCa4S)
B.
D~sign Requirements:
.. .
The mixture design properties shall be determined in accordance with the Superpave
mixture design system except as noted: The Superpave gyratory compaction effort
employed shall conform with Table 828.02.B.4.
-;
TABLE 828.02.B.1.
"SUPERPA VE MIXTURE DESIGN VOLUMETRIC CRITERIA
Design Parameter Design Criteria
.C-
a. Percent ofM~um Specific Gravity (%Gmm) at the design 96%
number of gyrations, (Nd)
b. % Gmm at the initial number of gyrations, (Ni) <89%
c.% Gmm at the maximum number of gyrations, (Nm) <98%
d. Percent" voids in mineral aggregate (VMA) at Nd See Table 828.02.B.2. .
e. . Percent voids filled with asphalt (VF A) at Nd See Table 828.02.B.3.
f. Fines to effective asphalt binder ratio (FfPbe)
1. Mixtures designed above or through the Restricted Zone 0.6-1.2
2. Mixtures designed below the Restricted Zone 0.8-1.6
g. Tensile strength (GDT 66)
1. Ratio 80% min.
2. Stress 400kPa min.'
. h. Retention of Coating (GDT 56)' 95% inin.
MaXimum specific gravity (Gmm) determined in accordance with AASHTO T 209.
TABLE 828.02.B.2.
SUPERP A VE VO~S IN MINERAL AGGREGATE (VMA) ,CRITERIA
Nominal Maximum Sieve Size (mm) MinirD.um % VMA
37.5 11
25.0 12
19.0 , 13
12.5 14
9.5 15
..
VMA is to be determined based on effective specific gravity of the aggregate (Gse).
828.02 (Continued)
. ,'1.
Pl[6P gS30-(,;?4-S)
. .
;
-;-
TABLE 828.02.B.3.
SUPERPA VE VOIDS Fll.LED WITH ASPHALT (VFA) CRITERIA
RANGE ,
,MIX DESIGN LEVEL Minimum Maximum
A 70 80
B 65 78
C 65 75
D 65 75
TABLE 828.02.B.4.
SUPERPA VE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC)
COMPACTION CRITERIA
MIX DESIGN LEVEL Nini Ndes Nmax
A* 5' 76 . 117
B 7 86 134
C 8 96 152
D 8 109 174
* Note: This gyratory compaction level shall be used for all Superpave mixes used in shoulder
construction and for sub-base mixture under Portland cement concrete pavement.
828.03 CONVENTIONAL FINE GRADED MIXTURES
. 'q .
PttoP 8530 _5 (;<45)
JOB MIX FORMULA AND DESIGN LIMITS
,:;
MlXTURE
CONTROL
TOLERANCE TYPE MlXTURE 4.75 mm
GRADING
REQUIREMENTS
:I: 0.0 % Passing 12.5 mm Sieve 100
:I: 5.6 % Passing 9.5 mm Sieve 90-100
, :I: 5.7 % Passing'4.75 mm Sieve 75-95
:1:4.6 % Passing 2.36 mm Sieve 60-65
:I: 3.8 % Passing 300 Ilm Sieve 20-50
:1:2.0 % Passing 75 Ilm Sieve 4-12
DESIGN
REQUIREMENTS
:1:0.4 Range for % AC 6.00 - 7.50
n/a Design Optimum Air Voids (%) 5-7
n/a % Aggregate Voids Filled with AC 50-80
Tensile Splitting Ratio After
n/a Freeze Thaw Cvcle (GDT 66) . Min. 0.8
n/a % Retention of Coating 95
(GDT 56)
* Mixture Control Tolerance not applicable to this sieve for this mix.
Note: This mixture shall be compacted at 50 gyrations with the Superpave Gyratory Compactor.
..
PfJof'iS3~2'1{ d.1S)
828.04 AGGREGATE GROUPS ALLOWABLE
~
The aggregate group or blend which may be used for each mixture will be specified with the Pay
Item description. A description of the aggregate groups and blends which may appear in the
Proposal and Plans are defined as follows:
~
PAY ITEM DESIGNATION EXPLANATION OF AGGREGATE GROUPS
ALLOWABLE
Group I or U
100% Group I, 100% Group II, or any blend of the groups may
be used.
Group II only
100% Group II only is required.
. Blend I
Either 100% Group II material or a blend of Group I and
Group II aggregate is allowed. The Group I fraction shall not
exceed 60% by weight of the total aggregates nor contribute
more than 50% by weight of the coarse aggregate portion.
828.05 RUTTING SUSCEPTIDILITY TESTING: The Office of Materials and Research
may run a rutting susceptibility test on any asphalt mixture used in construction. Results oftests
with the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer shall be provided for any mixtures designed by a Certified
Hot MiX Producer or Independent Testing Laboratory.
The rutting susceptibility test will be conducted according to GDT Test Procedure 115. Each
mix will have 3 specimens fabricated and tested. If the average rut depth for the . 3 specimens
exceeds 5 mm for SMA and Superpave mixes and 7 mm for the 4.75 mm mix, that asphaltic
concrete mixture shall not be used in the Work.
828.06 FATIGUE TESTING: The Office of Materials and Research may conduct a fatigue
test on a.ny-Superpave asphalt miXture design or Superpave asphalt mixture used in construction
to determine acceptability of the materials. The test shall be performed according to test
procedure AASHTO. TP 8-94, or other procedure approved by the Office of Materials and
Research. .
..
Materials and Research
v'
I I
Revised March 1, 1988
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OF GEORGIA
"
SPECIAL PROVISION
Modification of Standard Specification
SECTION 228 - GRADING (MODIFIED), INCLUDING HAUL
(For County Contract Only)
PROJECT NO.: ffL(Of g530 _sq {a4S}
228.01 DESCRIPTION:This item consists of excavation of all materials of whatever nature including
borrow if required, to alignment, grade and typical cross-sections shown .on the plans; or as directed by
the Engineer, all necessary hauling,formation of embankments, shoulder construction, subgrade.
construction, ditch excavation, finishing and dressing, replacement of unsuitable material removed from
the subgrade, and disposal of any unsuitable or surplus material. It shall include the removal and
disposal of miscellaneous roadway items including, but not limited to, curbs, drainage structures and
pavements, unless established as separate contract items. It shall also include all necessary clearing
and grubbing in accordance with Sections 201 and 202, required to complete the work unless these items
have been established as pay items in the contract. .
228.02 MATERIALS: All suitable material excavated, including that taken from trenches, roadway
ditches and slopes, shall be used in formirigembankments as far as practicable. Surplus or unsuitable
materials. shall be used in flattening slopes'of embankments, backfilling washes or ditches, 'or wasted
back of the construction lines as directed.
228.03 CONSTRUCTION: The construction shall be done using equipment approved by the
Engineer, which will not damage base, pavement or other appurtenances to be retained. The Engineer
shall set slope stakes to fit the typical section, or as he may deem necessary, establish grades in
accordance wit these specifications, and set final stakes to vei'ify that the excavation sections of the
roadway and the embankments comply with the typical section. The work shall be done in accordance
with the appropriate portions of Specifications 201, 202, 205, 206, 207, 208., and 209 of these
Specifications.
Prior to placing any base material, the subgrade shall be finished in accordance with 209.03.
A. Clearing and Grubbing: Clearing and grubbing shall be done well in advance of
excavation and embankment construction.
B. General Requirements:
1. Cross Section: As a. mInImum requirement the roadway shall be graded in
accordance with the specified typical sections.
2. Slopes, Ditches, Shoulders: The excavation shall be done so that front slopes,
ditches and shoulders are neatly trimmed to the lines given. Additional shoulder
width will be permitted when extra width shoulders are ready in place and fit the
existing roadbed provided the finished shoulders present a reasonably uniform
appearance.
I'
I
Page Two
..
3. Shaping and Dressing: After all excavation and formation of embankments and
shoulder have been substantially completed the roadway shall be properly shaped,
finished and dressed in reasonably close conformity to the lines and grades given.
C. Compaction: All embankments shall.be built up in 8-inch layers and the full width of the
cross section compacted in accordance with Section 208.
228.04 MEASUREMENT: Grading (Modified) Including Haul will be measured in Linear Miles along
the centerline of the road or the median, including ramps when so shown on the plans. Surplus material
may be disposed of beyond the end of the project, but the mileage measured for payment will not extend
beyond the established termini.
228.04 PAYMENT: The item of Grading (Modified) Including Haul will be paid for at the Contract Unit
Price per Linear Mile complete in place, which price shall be full compensation for clearing and grubbing
inside the construction limits where this item is not shown as a separate item in the Contract, for all
excavation to the typical section required or as modified herein, formation of embankments, construction
of shoulders, backing out subgrades for pavement, flushing fill slopes and ramps, filling washes, wasting
surplus or unsuitable material, finishing and dressing, cleaning of side ditches, all hauling of excavation,
and any incidentals necessary to complete the Item. It is clearly understood that in no case will any
separate payment be made for finishing and dressing, and that the cost of necessary finishing and
dressing to comply with these Specifications shall be included in the Contract Unit Price of Grading
(Modified) Including Haul.
Payment will be made under:
Item 228.
Grading (Modified) Including Haul.................... .per Linear Mile
Office of State Aid
. ~9 .
PROJECT NO.: PfLOP 8'5.3()--(5<45J
.::
. -
-.
~~
uJ ~~(2.~
. .R.(,,~.s.
.'
.
~ .
.
..
"
'.
.'.
.
..
"'J'::
(J)
c
S
S
~
JJ
-<
(J)
:c
m
m
-i
""0
...
o
(S.
o
-
z
!J
..
~
~\
(;J
o'
~
"'()'
('\.
'f'>
~
c/)
() ()
;::;: 0
'< c
o ::s
- -
'<
o
-
z
o
Z
:t>
s:
m
"'T1
:0
o
s:
-I
o
r
m
z
C')
-I
:r:
:E:C
-0
~~
:r::t>
-<
~.Ifl~
~
o 0
. :..t
~ \)I
oQ N
~ 3
-' -
.
- ~:o
--
- cO
. ~~
- ,j - ~~
f\}!::t 0 s:
,_ -1-1
-~ :r:.
('I.. .
J
~
-
-
~
::r
(!)
::J
C
3
a-
(!)
.....
o
::J
-
::r
en
~
en
::r
o
c
0..
()
o
.....
.....
(!)
en
u
o
::J
0..
~.
::r
s:
<0
::J
C
3
a-
<0
.....
S.
-
::r
(!)
~
~
(!)
<0
-
o
::J
s:
(!)
3
0>
U
~
-;, -;,
---!!!.. ..
-
,---- -------------
z-
,
.--- - -
~ i(l
~ [ ~~. 0
-a ::l
0
1 z
>
VI
-
~7 --. '.1
~
:J:
rT1
> ---
0 --
"i. .- -
~ ~ ..kA
0 ~ ~
rT1
-l
~
,
.
.'
.
! .
.
.
~ ii.
~
~
5
1
"'"
. -'1
:)"i~~
Alp ~~III
~~apa
. :<~.~~
. .J~fl!if.l
" · !~~T
· ~ 'S'8
I ~lllY
1 Hi~
.
~
r;-
N
~
E
~
'r. .
:l:
I I
t_,.(:':~
!
a
i
"
j
1
!.....
<.
\;;(";::::~):
~~~ '-.'
-+-':-"---i!i---jN
~ ~
" \,~
-.,'
~
'-
-
-~
-
~
~
~.
lD-
>
0>
8' 13 pi
?< ~ ~
o
'"
Q
"" z
- "
o
,.
~
;Fz
>
o
,.,
~
I'"'!l
~~
>-
F=~
",r-
>"
-.r;
n2:
~:~
Zn
~::l
~
rl
, ,
tic
~
H=
II
'-I_
I'
>1-
I'
i
ftv-
!
d
~
n
z
C)
o
(T1
-<
>
?
~
"
.
-.
~
.
.
I>
.~
'.
:i"~!~
bS~;S
<'~ i~
~~fI~i~
~~liT
J~~!i
i, ~~
.
ti,a
c: .,; ~
~ --:--- :,'.: ',. .
~;~~ ~ .:;':. J~
q~1 g .
:i~ m ~I Ii
~~I. I:! A~ lS
rlq o~
as ~ ....
da ~ .;,::]..
, ~ . '." ...... 'I
~ lI: .' .., .
1/1 .....
o . .... a
o
>
~ ~
~ ; Fz
s:
o
,.,
N
lD
>
0>
~ i~
b "
~
no
>>
"',
15
fz
,,-<
! s: ~
an-l
~ rT1 ~
~cnr-
;;I>
c-l
n~
2>
:oF
ITI",
Q
I!
[VI
~
::l
~
>
N
E
~;
71
i
:~
@I
~
I
"
t:
C)
!~
ii
~
ile
la
!P'
~. ,
~P
8.
i
l(l
o
::l
o
z
>
..
-1.
IP~
;~I~~
.@ ~~
'~h~
13,.
"i11
~:~
I;~
~
~~
~.
"
~
.
~
r
'8J~!~
'"~~SQ .L-
~~1~~8 .
hT! 8
.m~
;:J
>
"
C)
>
;;t
l!l
c
o
(T1
C)
>
;;t
,~tO il'~J.
:;::.-- . r,\~~
,.......,.. ~ ~~ E ~
,.'~ ClO~g"
,.;'" ",'~Q~
.:' ~ ~ lP ~
.. . . . F! & i:;
.:! ~~~;
:';. . v;i : ~
. - l!
i.; ',0' ........ ~ ~ ~
". . ,_ ~ F
'.' N
...' ,~
....~~
,. e
~
j(l
o
:l
o
z
~
.~
.:..c:.
r."
:1 "
.
~ .\
~:!. -\'
~.,,<
a. ..
. .
,
;;I i
~ I
a .
i
-l
~
:1
:>.
r
r
:>
......
rT1
:::0
>
r
"'C
r
c
"
J
"2
U
~~
~~
L
. .
.....
.....
I
~~
:l!a
"';;I
6",
[
.',
.'
V;::f::llt
~~~
!l!~*l
f'p
~i!
o
o
~
(/)
il
ITI
>
~
(/)
5
ITI
l!II
;li
'"
,;;
~
~
'"
'"
c
-c
(/)
il
ITI
>
~
(/).
5
ITI
(/)
ITI
n
:i
o
z
~
ll"""
E~~
~i~
~.';1;..~
=;-~ ~..- ~
~ ~,.~ :tn
"stE
~~ 0
!l);li Z
.~
~.. >
i~ N
..
.~
~
(I)
d
;0
3::
o
:::0
~
Z
()
o
z
Z
fTI "
(")
=1 c:z
O en 0
Cll_
Z 0. Cll
(I) Ql"
en --i
.... Cll
Cll 3
'@-u
-.0
.... ....
Cll Ql
0.-.<
g:m
.0. (3
::;0(1)
Cll -.
n 0
_:J
CllC)
0.0
CT:J
'<::;-
-0
=r_
Cll_
mm
:J 3
ceCIl
:i" en
Cll=r
Cll Ql
=-'=
CT
Cll
z
!l
a
l'l
~
~~
~~
-"
->
I"F
Eli!
~
~-l
!il'"
,,0
8~~
~:.C)
f;ll'~
.l:
i!llll~~
~a~r.1
"'2....
~:l'"
~~!
;a~
"';!o
~~~
2~~
~~~
l'l~"
~o~
2~i!l
"';!6
!l!
F
~
()()
>>
(l)r
~L
-0
z-
IZ
"'C-i
ro
>rTJ
~.~
(1);=
;d>
c-i
():E
~>
:::oF
rTJ(I)
o
....,
z
!l
a
~
(I)~ ~ > S Z
ClS o Ill.... !!:
~~ S$:ovf!:
>z Z,-C.-
!:l" n....z'"
>- :u ~.... .
illl ~rl~8
~ ~:u~~
!:; c ~ g ~
"';2~rl-
-~~ c
~~~:i!
Cl.....",c=;
>>-lS~
1ll~~Gl J!
~g~cn ~
!:; ~ ~ P
?
+
"!
I
~
0-0
~:>
::o~
~~
rrlrrl
ZZ
()-t
:c::O
rrI
rrl-O
XI
():>
:>()
<rr1
:>~
:::lrrl
OZ
z-t
;0
o
)>
o
r~~
J ,,-
&~
eO -l
. en $;
"'~~
- I
" ("
S "'~
I~
O~
.t:-!
;:J III .~ s:: Z
c:;l .Ill III 0
~~ a ~ iD
... III III ..
~ 0 -,-
:i!::t o.:n>
.-.co=
22 g-@31
~n 0 ::;.~
5~ !=' ~ Ul
IIIrl CD ~.
c: ::s_
'" --
.., Ul 3
f; III CD
'" ::s CD
0._
0"-
CD:r
CD
"2.GJ
III CD
n 0
m ~
en o.<e
(i> · 5. Oi.
... !'> III 0
!: VI ?- 80
~ ,OJ 0 ~
l'" a.
n III 0
o ::s ~
~ nlll
-c m 5.
~ ~~
;:;l :rm
o I
ITI /11\)!
> Sl
~ ~ t:
iA,B.
L-. 3(/):
3 ~ .
II\~ !
c:l I
.1 n I
In'
<~ I
(lI~ f
~
~2
"'III
"'::j
>-z
~"
o
o
:z:
!6
'"
rl
\J
)>
~
Z
G1
o
rrJ
-I
)>
r
Z
~
\n
\
>I~
:;0 n .
On ~
~&:l 0
(/) ITI
\
I
\
\
\
I
\
,
,
\
\
\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
!':7
...
(/)
5
-c
ITI
Z
:!J
F
>
:;0
ITI
>
(/)
~
;:;l
:;0
M
~
r-
~
:;0
iii
(/)
!)
"\
,
'.
...................
'\
,
\
,
no O":E"OZ
o 0 -"< 0 a 0
!!!. <5 0 N~m' iii
o(i)C" :J!l"
:T 0. '" (119. in. ~
m~.>> 8=m
O-:r-^r< 2.0
cn_.V"f' CD-CD
"OUl (l\m~"O
~n &o._~
3 g ~0"~3
CD=:-. c.'<:Tm
;a~)>~~m;a
O-:J cn;::;:o
-;;'< nCD_
-l -" -. 0 3 -l
""-Q)' ::J(J)...,
g;g3 ~g:g;
(f)_(/) o_cn
"O:ro -c:"O
g,~~ :;."Og,
Illm:E_=Q'1ll
g{g ~Q O"~ g
::l 0 '" :t:om "0 ::s
. ~m!-5'~Ul-
c:-@ ~ ll! 3"0
-.-....nmlll
~m.:D>oaa:
"< Co · a c Q.
g, 0" 7Q1ll ::s al
=r~ i' 5 g. ~
CD~.sCD:.g
nUllC;::r_.
OmO:;'.-.::s
3"O~:T~n
.~ - "0 0 0
"'" III -::s::s
1ll::S Ill_Ul
::Jcn ~DJ2
c.~ -0 Ug.
e!.C.~CD. 5.
::l ::l (ii"O )><e
og.a.~=s:
m -.
0. en
:;)
\J
-
~
r
~
2-.)>
()
- ()
",
o (f)
., (f)
f'l
I SlRUCTlIRE ,,, ___ ,- - . --, I
STRUClURE p: 24.'.'"
-
"l
I
"I
~~
..
eEl
ElOW ROAD SUI
'~lIJ
sa
;;l
~~
"a
22.2'
~
~
en
r
5
()
rTJ
"
>
M
r
1I!il~821/l
;2~~~~ -
::~i~.~
~o"'~ r.1
;;l~'1~
~~~i
.,,,,p~
,;;-< ~
o
,
,
~ .
o .
;;
. ::~ ..,
.
.
,
....~~
,;
p" -
~.
...
ol
~
/
-,f=>
.'
~
;0
M
lJ)
N
''-1
~
o
VI
N
.
.-
.-
o
0:
II)
"'"
II)
':<
o
"
.!)
\J1
iJ
'3
t/l
1
~
;;t
r
:~~
"0.. "
'!~:.:;,
~
"'U
~
>Cf
V>-
o
00
;00
IT!z
0(")
~.
IT!
Or
CD~
-(IT!
r
-i-
:r:Z
fTl0
IT!~
Z'
G)~
zr
fTlC
I"lZ
;OG)
z
o
~
CIl en
~;::
l\)'O
.....(1)
;:.a
(1) l\)
~ (;
~.~
'"10
;.~
~.dQ'
'0 ::s
].~
(1) <
() (1)
~I;
~ ~ " U1
o. ~
-< -t ;0 ~
r ;::s lJ) M
0 ~ M
;0 Z
lJ) :c ~
fT1
N
Ol N t-'
0 ++ 0
+ (..l (..l (")
0 0 0 >
0 I I :j
....:J I (..l N 0
0 N 0 m Z
~ + + + >
(J1 VI l".l
(J1 0 0 ~
~
cn~ t-4
~
~~ t%j
U)
-- ~R- . .,.
-' CO . .
... -> I:X]
0 0> ~ 0> 0
0 0 0 0 ~~
0 0 0 0
t::1&:
fJ)~
:....::1
:r:o
IZ
m (Jt rn
UlO1 ())-- ~o
00 (J1(J1 ><"2:1
--z
iil Q 0
- -
::: -0 . (1)
o iil ..
OO~
0(1)::r
3.3(1)
o(1)r
-3.0
0.- 0
~3~
(')" !!!. G)
m3.~
. (1) (1)
::J ....
III ::J
~ 3
(1) (1)
- ::J
Ill-
::J III
o.::r
-.Ill
::J=
11I0-
~(1)
~m
-'11I
0-0
::J 0
o ::J
-III
5'
<D
N
~
p..~
~
(f}'lj
""'":3~
~()
trj>
txj~
~C/)
otxj
en
~j
~o
>z
bf'l
o
."
I'>
z
o
~
-~-f
o ::r
:T CD
CD" -
o III 8
CD::l1ll
"tJ Co -
1ll~(Q
domo
33Cii
CD~3
3,m3
o 0 CD
_~::l
-flll-
iil.9:~
::lC-'
rn~;;-
"gIllCD
~=a
as.-<'
~r 31. ~
. CD::J
1/1 CD
ao
CD
::Jill
011I
o III
0-<
!!l.
z
o
(/)
()
}>
r
fT1
~
! ;t~
~. ~
..
ell'
.vI
~<?
2 ~
~"
r~
o~
n
o -
.
'It
,. I..... t .
;~"":"....7~
DWG.3
_ ~CL€SS l<cA-"t>
DJrG. :;.~ a-I i ~ 1jO[
~.~ ~~tl;JOD[
,J :;.;i no[
GREENE; . > ~
~ ~:f'~B-DD[~
D G. 6 f.!...",..".:.t.?,'.'.'. '~ DD[
rf, ~
WALKER ,S, ~,~ ST
. '.-:.;1:;' DO
. . '. ~.~ ~
D lVlG 7 ,~:/,.'4\;,;"L~ji.. ~:;ii:t, S
". . . ...... . ..' .......c,. c' . t:3
.". ::.:. ",:,,:'-Ic.,.';' ". ,0 WATKINS ST ~
8-5 ~.
SA VANNAH RIVER
-~
b
-~,'.
'" "
4_ i
-- .-':
<
. - .. .
":."" -.:.
. ..".:..-
-~:."~.~-.._.
. .'
~
~
[=~:
~
i I
I I ~', .
, I~(
~ ~~v
~M. .
UNEY1~'
I
-. ....
. .
- .'.
."
......,... .
i~ .:;: .
~:4
. 1\
MAP Z OF Z.
~ ", ~4~)
I,OeATION MAP AU6U9rt\.. Rl'~ C4