HomeMy WebLinkAboutSandridge Storm Drainage Improvement
Augusta Richmond GA
DOCUMENT NAME: &:\<<1 \!-y)~ 'e:,--\CJ'(\'r'I \:)'(~ \mpro\.CV\mJr
DOCUMENT TYPE: ~\\c\~ D'(de(
YEAR: C\"\
BOX NUMBER: () 3>
~ILE NUMBER: \~;(J~
NUMBER OF PAGES:
'6
.,
";' ..:':.....t..
~
CHANGE ORDER
NUMBER: 1
DATE: 7-1-97
PROJECT TITLE:
Sand Ridge Storm Drainage Improvements
ORIGINAL CONTRACT DATE:
4-24-97
PROJECT NO.: 55-8796-096
OWNER: Augusta-Richmond county Commission-Council P.O. NUMBER: 137290
CONTRACTOR:
APAC-Georgia. Incorporated
The following change order is hereby made to the proposal for the above project:
(SEE ATTACHED SHEET)
TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS ORD.ER:
$ 36.906.40
The contract time will be increasedj--------- by ~ calendar days as a result
of this change.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$ 168.212.00
PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS (INCREASED/DECREASED):
$ 00
THIS.CHANGE ORDER (INCREASEDj---------):
$ 36.906:40
$ 205.118.40
TOTAL CONTRACT WITH CHANGE ORDERS:
****************************************************************
FUNDING SOURCE/ACCOUNT NUMBER:
PROJECT CONTINGENCIES
SUBMITTED BY:
Engineer
Clifford A. Goins
Depa':tea~ A
1-. Comptroller :...c.- ~.\\
/ .~
7
DATE: 7-1-97 f6r/'l1
DATE: 7-1-97 ~
DATE: a/1/'i7
DATE: filvfq/~
DATE: -2jJl:J 9 7
REQUESTED BY:
Robert Clements
FINANCE ENDORSEMENT:
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
fllis docUllliiillM,,"QI$
~7!~i~7
~
. ...--;.:
BID SCHEDULE FOR: Addition to Sand Ridge
TO ACCOMPANY THE PROPOSAL OF:
NAME: APAC-Georgia, Inc.
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1129
Augusta, GA 30903
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIY UNIT PRICE TOTAL AMOUNT
I. STREETS:
+001 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 5,800.00 5,800.00
+002 Silt Fence 400 LF 2.85 1,140.00
+003 Rem & Repl Chain Link Fence 202 LF 7.70 1,555.40
+004 Rem & Repl Wood Privacy Fence 115 LF 15.40 1,771.00
~005 18" HDP Pipe 100 LF 14.05 1,405.00
+006 24" HDP Pipe 400 LF 18.30 7,320.00
,+007 Junction Box Over Exst Line 2EA 1,250.00 2,500.00
-r008 Tie-In To Exst Trap lEA 850.00 850.00
+009 Storm Manhole 2EA 1,475.00 2,950.00
+010 Remove 24" C.M. Pipe 15 LF . 14.00 210.00
+011 Remove Headwall Lump Sum 550.00 550.00
+012 Grassing Disturbed Areas Lump Sum 1,600.00 1,600.00
+ 013 Construction Staking Lump Sum 750.00 750.00
~ 014 36" HDP Pipe 80LF 45.00 3,600.00
~ 015 36" HDP Flared End Section 1 EA 1,075.00 1,075.00
;- 016 Regrade, Topsoil & Grass Swale Lump Sum 2,700.00 2,700.00
+017 Drop Inlet, GP 1 lEA 1,130.00 1,130.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 36,906.40
By:
Title:
~ OVfrrlJ11 iJ-P or;"i,,~ I C()~ JY4~ I-
+ :I:.-+&m5 +D re..~~/ve c!r/Jinttftf> ~ d e. rOS;()1'1 p;-o"/~~
~. .
1- . ...
r~
i-
RIC.HMOND COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
1815 Marvin Griffin Road
Augusta, GA 3C9J6
(706) 796-5040
Fax: (706) 796-5045
July 15, 1997
JJII' Z'.1 ~6fi1'" l7:':..'
MEMO TO: Charles R. "Randy" Oliver
Administrator
FROM: ~ack F. Murphy
~~reconstruction Engineer
RE: Sand Ridge Storm Drainage Improvements
File Reference: 87-056
~ijS;l:A:I~jCNMQl\lct;OOt.lf1J7Y
.AJWMi~s:r~Mefi:S)OT1l:J~
In response to your letter of July 9, 1997, we offer the
fol'lowing information regarding questions from the Comptroller's
office.
1) Whv was this omitted? Who did it?
This project, as are all our projects, was put together
to resolve a problem at the lowest practical cost to
the taxpayers. We gave our design consultant a scope
within which to work as we do with all our projects.
During the design process we sometimes encounter
conditions, etc. that causes us and/or our designer to
alter the original scope.
In this particular situation the project scope did not
include a complete survey pr field investigation of the
entire development. It was confined to an area where
cons~derable erosion and silting was occur~ing since
this was the most visible problem area and also the
area called to our attention by local residents.
Once an agreement with a consulting engineer is
approved by the commission it is extremely difficult to
significantly alter the work to be done by the
consultant without going through a Change Order. At
times I'm sure it appears otherwise but we constantly
strive to avoid Change Orders unless there are no
reasonable alternatives. This applies during both the
design and the construction phases. As you can imagine
no work day passes that we are not faced with working
out some way to keep the design consultant and/or the
construction contractors working without significantly
altering their agreements with us. As you are aware we
are not always successful.
...~; . "1:; i
:-
Mr. Charles R. "Randy" Oliver, Administrator
July 15, 1997
Page 2
In this case no complaints had been received about
water standing in these two existing ditches on our
easement nor were these ditches included in the
~riginal scope of the design consultant's contract.
During construction the effected property owners made
their requests and we made the decision to extend the
18" and 36" storm drains to eliminate water standing in
the yards on our easements. .
As you can see these two pipe extensions were not
inadvertently omitted but rather were never considered
until the property owners complained. This also should
answer the question of "Who did it?"
2) Are unit prices the same on both oriqinal and Chanqe
Order?
All items of work in the Change Order that were in the
original contract have identical unit prices. We were
able to negotiate this although the original project is
completed, including extending the existing 18" and 36"
storm drain pipes, and the proposed work to resolve the
severe erosion and drainage problem is in a different
location although it is in the same vicinity.
3) Who all has inspected?
The site of the proposed work to resolve the severe
drainage and erosion problem has been inspected by
Robert Oliver, Chief Sediment and Soil Erosion Control
Supervisor, Jack Murphy, Preconstruct ion Engineer,
Robert Clements, Assistant Preconstruct ion Engineer and
Jim Wall, County Attorney.
As a result of these inspections Mr. Wall advised us to
proceed with a solution to this problem to avoid
litigation since, in the opinions of all the above, the
responsibility for this problem obviously was Augusta-
Richmond County's.
The sites for extending the existing 18" and 36" storm
drain pipes were inspected by Jack Murphy,
Preconstruction Engineer, Robert Clements, Assistant
Preconstruct ion Engineer and Carl Tankersley,
Construction Inspector.
4) Show plat and ~ictures:
The plats for easements are on file in the Right of Way
Acquisition office at 1815 Marvin Griffin Road. There
are no photographs.
.-
'I ' _
. ...
Mr. Charles R. "Randy" Oliver, Administrator
July 15, 1997
Page 3 _'
.. '~.... .... - '- - '':
The last page of our original submission for this
change'order includes a detailed breakdown on all items
of work that are covered by this Change Order request.
There are three (3) items identified by an asterisk
which represent items that were included as an overrun
of the original contract. The remaining 14 items are
to accomplish the work to resolve the .drainage and
erosion problem.
We hope this answers all questions, regarding this
change order request.
RLC/lgg