HomeMy WebLinkAboutJ.B. Messerly WWRP
Augusta Richmond GA
DOCUMENT NAME: .). ~. ~'(\y \.>.Y02i'\J
DOCUMENT TYPE: c..rorctf.... ol(de'(
YEAR: C\l.9
BOX NUMBER: OD
FILE NUMBER: \OCf1G
NUMBER OF PAGES: -3
- -\ - I 2: E 1i435 Telfair Street
Ted W,.IEJ1is, ~E, Chm. of Board, Emeritus ~ Augusta, Georgia 30901.2494
J, J,ifankersley, PE. President, E N GIN E E R S
J. R.\(\rmslrong, PE, Vice, PreSident
\...- '
Jorge E. Jimenez, PE, Secretary
J, T, Eubanks, PE., Treasurer
C. D. Drown, PE.
ZIMMERMAN, EVANS AND LEOPOLD, INC.
(706) 724-5627
October 9, 1996
Mr. Tom Wiedmeier, P. E.
Assistant Director
Augusta - Richmond County Utilities Deparbnent
Peach Orchard Rd.
Augusta, Ga. 30906
Re: J. B. Messerly WWTP
Equalization Facilities
Final Change Order
Dear Mr. Wiedmeier:
Enclosed is the Final Change Order for the referenced project We have
reviewed this change order and evaluated the Contractor's claims for additional
costs. Our recommendations are as follows:
1. Previously approved field modifications. These items had been previously submitted
as field modifications and had been approved by the Owner on our recommendation.
We concur with the amount.
2. Misc. Pipe Supports. This covers the increase in the air piping size from 6" to 8" for
the scum corral. We concur with the increase for the cost of the larger valves.
3. Concrete Pipe Supports, We do not concur with the Contractor's argument.
4. Electrical Changes. We concur with items 4,5,6, and 10,
5. Thrust Blocking. We concur with the Contractor.
6. Drop Pipe Modifications. We do not concur with the Contractor,
7. Pinch Valve Replacement. We do not concur with the Contractor.
8. Interest on Retainage. We concur with the Contractor,
9. Plant Shut Downs. We concur on the Wash Water pipe tie in and recommend 1
week's delay compensation.
Mr. Tom Wiedmeier, P. E.
Assistant Director
Augusta - Richmond County Utilities Department
10/09/96
Page 2
:;0
10. Back-fill handling. extra stone and grading, We concur that the contractor had to
handle the earth fill repeatedly due to the water retention of the on site soils, This was
excessive and could not have been anticipated by the Contractor at the time of the bid.
We disagree with the Contractor that excessive testing caused delays, The delays
were caused by the necessity to handle the soils repeatedly due to its water retention.
We recommend compensation for additional site grading, the use of extra stone, and 'h
of the cost of additional handling, as shown on the attached Final Change Order
Worksheet.
11. Extra Work at Valve Station. We concur with the Contractor.
12. Extra Work at J/O Box. We do not concur with the Contractor.
The Contractor's request amounted to $ 216,704. Our recommendation is for an increase
of$ 83,083. Addingjhe inter.esLon retainage and the previously approvedJielL
modificatiolJS raises the Final Change Order total to $ 119.882.. The original Contract
Pnce, including the pre-award Change Order No.1 was $ 4,222,915. The total amount of
the two Change Orders (C.O, #2 and Final C. 0.) on this project is $ 207,374, This
represents a 4.9010 increase on a very complex project. We are very pleased with the
quality and cost of the project.
We also recommend the contract time be extended to the date of substantial completion
July 19, 1996. We are forwarding the Change Order to the Contractor for execution, We
are requesting by copy of this letter that S, A. C. execute this Change Order and return it
to our office with the Release of Lien, Record Drawings, and Final Pay Estimate. for the
project .Please process this Change Order so that we can close out this project.
Sincerely
ANS AND LEOPOLD, Inc.
Ii C;, 68 "2-
_ lC),111..
--
IDollle\,
cc:
JEJ:st
, .-
'.
CH_-\~GE ORDER
~.
\ l':.. LBER.
0.-\ TE.
2.
Nov. 20, ,qqc.
PROJECT TITLE r..,.f'/e.1.JU E'1 VQ I ,~~'hb'"
ORlGC'"AL CO~TR.-\CT D:~ TE 4/0 I /'12.. PROJECT ~'l:.lBER
O\.V":'-"ER, .~ul!Us,a-Richmond (cum.... CJmmlssion-Counc:1 PO \1.:.ffiER
CO i\TR..-\CnJR So,", ~ A+'~...d' lc" C~~-tr(;(c;..+or~
The r"ollowing cnange order is he:-eoy made to ine ~roposal for ihe abo....~ pro,iec;,
Sc.c. 'l H4C hl!'J.
s
TOT.-\L A.\'LOl:-:T OF THIS CH.-\..,\;GE ORDER:
The conrraCi: time '.vill be increase.{decre:ls~d b,' _ ..:alend:lr days as a result of this change,
ORIGfNAL CO~TRACT .~\.10l,);'T,
s 4, 222,ClI5"
PR.E\ lOCS CK..... '>;GE ORDERS ([~;CRE.-\SE DECRE.J,.SE):
5
8& , 4q 2.
THIS CH..lu'\iGE ORDER (INCRE..l"SE/DECREASE)
5
100 / "1 to"
4,4",113
TOT.\1. COt'olRACT \VITH CHA~GE ORDERS
s
....*~***_.*.*.*..~..........~s._...~a.A.......*..a~*...~*~..*.a.~*.*...~*a..
'''b \ .
Fu"NDING SOCRCE:ACC(); \'1 ~l.;CvfBER_ c..u +f 5 nerac:.wo. ( t".. E ~-h-., 5(0""
REQl ESTED BY:
.
~l::>. W~ft."'_
SL"BMITTED BY --u;t.w
N.M4-? H~ks
DATE: l'/l.a/'J('
DA TE, ll/z.o/qfo
DATE: r ! / ;JA'/C:;~
L
DATE: ///z/h
I (
DA TE: 1'1 f%
;~:~;:-.~EA
FINA.L'\fCE E~TIORSE)..[E)l-r.
RECO~~I:E)lUED BY
APPRO\-"ED a\"
TOTAL P.02