Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-06-08-Meeting Agendawww.augustaga.gov Public Service Committee Meeting Committee Room- 6/8/2009- 12:30 PM PUBLIC SERVICES 1. Motion to approve Campbell & Paris Change Order #1 – Airfield Signage. Attachments 2. New Ownership application: A. N. 09 - 82: A request by Mark Detchemendy for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with the White Elephant Cafe located at 1135 Broad St. District 1. Super District 9. Attachments 3. New Application: A. N. 09 - 81: A request by Miriam F. Rizvi for a retail package Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with A M 786, Inc. DBA East Boundary Food Mart located at 202 East Boundary St. District 1. Super District 9. Attachments 4. Motion to approve the request for an emergency purchase order for the replacement of the HVAC units at Augusta Public Transit’s Administrative Building on Fenwick Street. Attachments 5. Motion to approve the Sec. 5307 Augusta Public Transit grant application between the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Augusta, Georgia for the use of American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funds. Attachments 6. Presentation by Mr. Darryl Nettles regarding problems associated with the sub-leasing of BL's Restaurant on Laney Walker Boulevard. Attachments 7. Motion to approve the selection and contract of Deriso Consulting Group for the selection of the Airport Custodial Consultant. Attachments 8. Motion to approve property lease with the Federal Aviation Administration. Attachments 9. Accept bid to replace hangar roof at Daniel Field. Attachments 10. Motion to approve the contract with Seabury Airline Planning Group, LLC as the airport Air Service Consultant Agency of choice. Attachments Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM Airfield Signage Rehabilitation - Change Order #1 Department:Augusta Regional Airport Caption:Motion to approve Campbell & Paris Change Order #1 – Airfield Signage. Background:A contract was entered into with Walker Whiteside for the rehabilitation of the airfield signage in September of 2008. Analysis:It has been determined that two (2) additional Guidance Signs were required at the intersection of the runways. It is anticipated that this will add an additional 61 days until total completion once the contractor orders the sign. Financial Impact:The Change Order is in the amount of $11,450 and brings the total contract to $293,736.00. Alternatives:Deny request. Recommendation:Approve request. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 551 08 1301 5412110 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 1 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 3 Item # 1 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 3 Item # 1 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 3 Item # 1 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM alcohol application Department:License & Inspections Caption:New Ownership application: A. N. 09 - 82: A request by Mark Detchemendy for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with the White Elephant Cafe located at 1135 Broad St. District 1. Super District 9. Background:This is a new ownership application. Formerly in the name of Vance E. Shimley. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the Augusta Richmond County Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a pro-rated fee of $2117.50. Alternatives: Recommendation:License & Inspections recommends approval. The RCSD recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 2 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 2 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 2 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM alcohol application Department:License & Inspections Caption:New Application: A. N. 09 - 81: A request by Miriam F. Rizvi for a retail package Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with A M 786, Inc. DBA East Boundary Food Mart located at 202 East Boundary St. District 1. Super District 9. Background:This will be a totally new store. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the Augusta Richmond County Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a pro-rated fee of $605.00. Alternatives: Recommendation:License & Inspections recommends approval. The RCSD recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 3 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 3 Item # 3 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 3 Item # 3 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 3 Item # 3 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM Augusta Public Transit - HVAC Units Department:Augusta Public Transit Caption:Motion to approve the request for an emergency purchase order for the replacement of the HVAC units at Augusta Public Transit’s Administrative Building on Fenwick Street. Background:At the present time none of the HVAC units are operational. A work order was placed with Facilities Maintenance to inspect the units and they recommended the units be replaced. Analysis:We have received three (3) quotes for the replacement of the units as follows: BTM Management Services, LLC $24,248.00 CDO Management $28,675.66 Frothingham Commercial Services, Inc. $33,000.00 I am recommending BTM Management Services, LLC be awarded the bid. Financial Impact:BTM Management Services, LLC, has submitted the lowest bid of $24,248. Alternatives:None. By not approving this, Augusta Public Transit employees will be forced to work in unfavorable conditions as the temperature begins to climb, which may cause APT Administration to shut down and some employees to become ill. Recommendation:Approve the request. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 546-09-1116/5319130 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 4 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 4 Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 4 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 1 Item # 4 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 1 Item # 4 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM Augusta Public Transit American Recovery Reinvestment Act Funds Department:Augusta Public Transit Caption:Motion to approve the Sec. 5307 Augusta Public Transit grant application between the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Augusta, Georgia for the use of American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funds. Background:On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery Reinvestment Act of 2009 into law. The law allowed the Federal Transit Administration to allocate $2,754,534 to Augusta, Georgia/Augusta Public Transit for capital purchases at 100% federally funded. Analysis:The approval of this grant application will allow Augusta Public Transit to continue to provide transportation service to the Citizens of Augusta- Richmond County and to move ahead with capital purchases, planned for later years. Financial Impact:The funding for this application is 100% federally funded. The total estimated capital funds will be $2,754,534 to fund all of the capital purchases. Alternatives:None. By not approving this submission of the grant, we would lose the funds and the City would be taking on all the capital costs associated with Augusta Public Transit. Recommendation:Approve the submission of this grant application. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: n/a REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 5 Project Budget Quantity FTA Amount Tot. Elig. Cost SCOPE 111-00 BUS - ROLLING STOCK 3 $0.00 $1,235,000.00 ACTIVITY 11.92.06 PURCHASE BICYCLE ACCESS, FACIL & EQUIP ON BUSES 0 $0.00 $30,000.00 11.12.02 BUY REPLACEMENT 35-FT BUS 3 $0.00 $1,125,000.00 11.12.40 BUY ASSOC CAP MAINT ITEMS 0 $0.00 $80,000.00 SCOPE 114-21 BUS: SUPPORT EQUIP AND FACILITIES 0 $0.00 $341,534.00 ACTIVITY 11.42.10 ACQUIRE - MOBILE FARE COLL EQUIP 0 $0.00 $300,000.00 11.42.11 ACQUIRE - SUPPORT VEHICLES 0 $0.00 $40,000.00 11.62.20 PURCHASE MISC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP 0 $0.00 $1,534.00 SCOPE 117-00 OTHER CAPITAL ITEMS (BUS) 0 $0.00 $1,178,000.00 ACTIVITY 11.7A.00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 0 $0.00 $700,000.00 11.7C.00 NON FIXED ROUTE ADA PARATRANSIT SERVICE 0 $0.00 $415,000.00 11.73.00 CONTINGENCIES/PROGRAM RESERVE 0 $0.00 $63,000.00 Estimated Total Eligible Cost: $2,754,534.00 Federal Share: $0.00 Local Share: $2,754,534.00 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 5 CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 1511 OF THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA) Pursuant to Title XI, Subtitle A, Section 1511 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Pub. L. 111-5, Feb. 17, 2009) (ARRA) and Federal Register Vol., 74, No. 42, March 5, 2009, Section 1 – 1511 Certifications, I, Deke Copenhaver, hereby certify that the attached project investments funded with appropriations by ARRA under the headings of the Transit Capital Assistance and Capital Investment Grants to the Federal Transit Administration, have received the full review and vetting required by law and that I accept responsibility that such investments are appropriate uses of taxpayer dollars. I further certify that the specific information required by section 1511 concerning each such investment (a description of the investment, the estimated total cost, and the amount of the ARRA funds to be used) is provided in the Augusta Regional Transportation Study (ARTS) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and in the State Transit Improvement Program (STIP). The TIP is available online at the Augusta-Richmond County Planning Commission/Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) website at Planning_Commission@augustaga.gov. The ARRA stimulus list is also available at their website page. _________________________________ Mayor Deke Copenhaver Signed this _____ day of June 2009 Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 3 Item # 5 A RESOLUTION Attachment “B” # _______ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, AND AUGUSTA PUBLIC TRANSIT TO SUBMIT APPLICATION(S) FOR, AND IF AWARDED, ACCEPT FEDERAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS GRANT(S) AWARDED, FROM THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) FOR ALL APPROPRIATED ANNUAL YEARS FOR CAPITAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE UNDER THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA) OF 2009 AND TO CONTRACT WITH FTA FOR SECTION 5340 FUNDS, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY SHOULD THE APPLICATION(S) RECEIVE APPROVAL, AND AMEND THE TRANSPORTATION FUND BY THE AMOUNT OF THE AWARD. WHEREAS, under The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, the Secretary of the Department of Transportation, United States of America (USDOT) has been authorized to make grant(s) for transit capital improvement; and, WHEREAS, Augusta, Georgia is designated the recipient of these economic stimulus transit funding; and, WHEREAS, the City owns and operates Augusta Public Transit, in Augusta, Georgia, which provides public transportation within the urbanized service area; and, WHEREAS, the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) both indicate the amount of the Section 5340 funds to be obligated; and WHEREAS, Augusta Public Transit may apply to FTA for a capital assistance contract covering one hundred percent (100%) of the eligible economic stimulus transit assistance for the City; and, NOW, THEREFORE, THE AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY COMMISSION, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: (1) That the Mayor or Transit Director is authorized to apply to FTA on behalf of the City for Federal economic stimulus transit assistance; (2) That the Mayor or Transit Director is authorized to execute contracts in accordance with fiscal year expenses on behalf of the City with FTA for the purpose of receiving FTA ARRA funds should the application(s) be approved; (3) That Augusta Public Transit is authorized to furnish such additional information as may be required in connection with the application(s). Attachment number 2 Page 2 of 3 Item # 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2009. Chairman of Commission or Sole Commissioner Signature Deke Copenhaver, Commission Chairman Type Name and Title Signed, sealed and delivered this day of , 2009 in the presence of Witness Notary Public/Notary Seal CERTIFICATE The undersigned duly qualified and acting (Title of Certifying/Attesting Official) of Augusta/Richmond County certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted at a legally convened meeting held on , 2009. Name of Certifying/Attesting Officer County Seal Title of Certifying/attesting Officer Attachment number 2 Page 3 of 3 Item # 5 Mayor Deke Copenhaver For Details, Contact: Karyn Nixon, Executive Assistant Room 806 - 530 Greene Street knixon@augustaga.gov Office (706) 821-1833 FAX (706) 821-1835 Cell (706) 564-4656 May 28, 2009 Dr. Yvette G. Taylor Regional Administrator Federal Transit Administration 61 Forsyth St., SW Suite 17T50 Atlanta, GA 30303 Attention: Jamie Pfister, FTA Director of Planning and Program Development Subject: Certification under Section 1511 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Dear Dr. Taylor: Pursuant to Title VI, Subtitle A, Section 1511 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Pub. L. 111-5, Feb. 17, 2009) (ARRA) and Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 42, March 5, 2009, Section 1 – 1511 Certifications, I have enclosed the appropriate signed Certification and list of Augusta, Georgia, Augusta Public Transit projects that the ARRA funds will be used for. This list includes the project description, cost estimate and the amount of ARRA funds to be used. If you should need any additional information, or if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (706) 821-1833. Sincerely, Deke Copenhaver, Mayor DC/dm Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 2 Item # 5 Mayor Deke Copenhaver For Details, Contact: Karyn Nixon, Executive Assistant Room 806 - 530 Greene Street knixon@augustaga.gov Office (706) 821-1833 FAX (706) 821-1835 Cell (706) 564-4656 Attachment: 1 Attachment number 3 Page 2 of 2 Item # 5 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM Darryl Nettles Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Presentation by Mr. Darryl Nettles regarding problems associated with the sub-leasing of BL's Restaurant on Laney Walker Boulevard. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 6 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 6 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM Deriso Consulting Group Selection & Contract Department:Augusta Regional Airport Caption:Motion to approve the selection and contract of Deriso Consulting Group for the selection of the Airport Custodial Consultant. Background:The airport, through the RFP process, selected Deriso Consulting Group to assist the airport with analysing the needs and duties of the Custodial Department. Analysis:This will help to ensure that the custodial department is properly staffed and has all the equipment needed to maintain the cleanliness and improve longevity of the new terminal. Financial Impact:All work will be done at the request of the airport and negotiated through work authorizations. Alternatives:Deny request. Recommendation:Approve request. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 551 08 1101 5211110 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 7 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 7 Ve n d o r s : Ac s e n t i a l , I n c . P. O . B o x 3 1 2 2 4 5 At l a n t a , G A 3 1 1 3 1 Am e r i c a ' s B e s t 22 0 7 S a g e m o n t C o u r t Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 6 De r i s o n Co n s u l t i n g G r o u p 41 7 5 C h a d d s Wa l k Ma r i e t t a , G A 30 0 6 2 FA J o h n s o n Co n s u l t i n g 15 2 0 S e n a t e St , S t e 1 7 7 Co l u m b i a , S C 29 2 0 1 Hi l l y a r d 30 2 N . 4 t h S t r e e t St J o s e p h , M O 64 5 0 1 Si z e m o r e P. O . B o x 5 5 5 Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 3 St a t e m e n t o f N o n - Di s c r i m i n a t i o n Ye s Y e s Y e s Co n f l i c t o f I n t e r e s t Ye s Y e s Y e s Re q u e s t f o r Qu a l i f i c a t i o n s Ye s Y e s Y e s Co n t r a c t o r A f f i d a v i t & Ag r e e m e n t Ye s I n c o m p l e t e Y e s Su b c o n t r a c t o r A f f i d a v i t & A g r e e m e n t Ye s I n c o m p l e t e Y e s No n - C o l l u s i o n A f f i d a v i t of B i d d e r In c o m p l e t e I n c o m p l e t e Y e s No n - C o l l u s i o n A f f i d a v i t Su b c o n t r a c t o r Ye s Y e s Y e s Lo c a l S m a l l B u s i n e s s Go o d F a i t h E f f o r t s Ye s I n c o m p l e t e Y e s Lo c a l S m a l l B u s i n e s s Su b c o n t r a c t o r / S u p p l i e r Ut i l i z a t i o n P l a n Ye s I n c o m p l e t e Y e s Or i g i n a l Ye s Y e s Y e s 6 C o p i e s Ye s Y e s Y e s RF Q I t e m # 0 9 - 0 5 3 A Cu s t o d i a l C o n s u l t a n t S e r v i c e s Fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - A u g u s t a R e g i o n a l A i r p o r t RF Q O p e n i n g D a t e : T h u r s d a y , A p r i l 2 , 2 0 0 9 a t 3 : 0 0 p . m . N o B i d Re s p o n s e Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 7 Initial Evaluation ­ The person/organization must certify that it has been providing Custodial Consultant Services to organizations similar in scope for at least twenty­ four (24) months. (maximum of 20 points) 16.7 ­ List at least three (3) clients for references. (maximum of 20 points) 20 ­ The number and size of the consulting projects presently being performed (by the person/organization) and the assigned staff; (maximum of 10 points) 1.7 ­ The status of existing consulting projects with respect to competition timetables; (maximum of 10 points) 0 ­ The status of personnel to be assigned to this project; (maximum of 10 points)6.7 ­ The number and type of projects that would be concurrently undertaken by the assigned staff; (maximum of 10 points)3.3 ­ The past ability of the firm to deliver this type of project on a timely basis; (maximum of 10 points) 5 ­ The nature of existing projects that are behind schedule or past the completion date. (maximum of 10 points)0 Total (Maximum of 100 points) 53.4 II. Resources and Assignments I. Qualifications of the Organization Evaluation Criteria Derison Consulting Group 4175 Chadds Walk Marietta, GA 30062 RFQ Item #09­053A Cummulative Evaluator Custodial Consultant Services For the City of Augusta – Augusta Regional Airport Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 2 Item # 7 Evaluation Following Vendor Presentation 19.3 20 10 10 9.3 10 10 10 98.6 Derison Consulting Group 4175 Chadds Walk Marietta, GA 30062 Attachment number 3 Page 2 of 2 Item # 7 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 2 Item # 7 Attachment number 4 Page 2 of 2 Item # 7 Attachment number 5 Page 1 of 1 Item # 7 Attachment number 6 Page 1 of 1 Item # 7 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM FAA Lease DTFASO-09-L-00117 Department:Augusta Regional Airport Caption:Motion to approve property lease with the Federal Aviation Administration. Background:The Federal Aviation Administration has rental space in the airport Weather Bureau Building. The FAA provides a service to the airport and is also a necessary component to airport operations. Current lease expired on September 30, 2008 but contract has been under negotiation between airport and FAA. This lease will be effective October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009 with one year options to extend until September 30, 2013. Contract has been reviewed by legal. Analysis:The lease is a 1 year lease with options up to a total of 5 years. The rental rate has increased for FAA from an old rate of $8.81 to a rate of $10.00 per square foot. The rental space has not changed which is 1,296 square feet. There is no other rental property on airport at that low rate they are willing to pay. Financial Impact:Anticipated monthly revenue is as follows: 1296 Square feet of rental office space at a rate of $10.00 per square foot. Annual rental revenue for space is $12,960.00 and $1,080 per month. Alternatives:Deny request. Recommendation:Approve request. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: N/A REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 5 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 6 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 7 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 8 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 9 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 10 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 11 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 12 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 13 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 14 of 15 Item # 8 Attachment number 1 Page 15 of 15 Item # 8 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM Hangar roof replacement Department:Daniel Field Airport Caption:Accept bid to replace hangar roof at Daniel Field. Background:The roof on the south hangar is more than 20 years old. There have been numerous leaks in both the office area and the bulk storage section. The airport consultant was asked to evaluate the roof and make recommendations. Analysis:The consultant found the roof to be in poor condition and recommended the roof be replaced. Several roof systems were evaluated and a High Performance Modified Bitumen Roof system was recommended. Financial Impact:Money from airport reserve funds(certificates of deposit) will be used to pay for this project. 552-08-1101--5413120 Alternatives:Deny request. Recommendation:Accept bid of $249,881.00 submitted by Thomson Roofing Company and approve ammending the Daniel Field budget to allow use of funds from the CD's. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 552-08-1101-5413120 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 9 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 9 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 9 Facility Summary Client_ID:City of Augusta Facility ID:Daniel Field Airport Sq. Feet: (all sections)30,000 Location:Augusta, GA Facility Contact:Mr. Boshears Contact Email: Contact Title:Airport Manager Contact Phone: Fax Number:Last Inspection:5/2008 Facility Photo Photo Notes Sign at front entrance. Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 10 Item # 9 Construction Details Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Square Feet:30,000 Architect:N/A Architect Email: Roofing Contractor:N/A Contractor Email: System Information Date Installed:1985 Warranty:Yes No No. of Roofs:One Roof Deck:Wood Deck Slope Dimension:Good Vapor Retarder:None System Type:Built-up Roof Felt:Need to Inspect Total System Layers:Multiple Surfacing:Smooth Mem. Attachment:Hot Asphalt Insulation - Layer 1 Type:R-Value: Attachment:Thickness: Perimeter Details Perimeter Type:Drip Edge, Parapet Wall Flashing Material:Built-up Roof Parapet Materials:N/A Coping Cap:Metal Drainage System:Gutters Roof Access:Roof Hatch System Notes Attachment number 2 Page 2 of 10 Item # 9 Inspection Report Inspection DateInspection DateInspection DateInspection Date :::: 05/05/200805/05/200805/05/200805/05/2008 05/05/200805/05/200805/05/200805/05/2008 Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Inspected By:Barry Slayden Inspection Type:Visual Inspection Age of Roof:>20 Core Data Available:Yes No Deck Condition: Partial Replacement Leakage:Yes No N/A Insulation:Partially Wet Perimeter:Poor Wall:N/A Projections:Poor Counter Flashings: Failed Reglets:Poor Debris:Yes No Control/Exp. Joints:N/A Ponding Water:Minor Parapet Wall:N/A Coping Joints: Perimeter Rating:Poor Notes:The perimeter metal edge had several places where expansion and contraction has split the membrane. Field Rating:Poor Notes: The BUR has been splitting out in the field of the roof areas. Drains & Gutters Rating:Good Notes:There's good slope on this facility. The internal gutter issue will need to be addressed. Overall Roof Evaluation:The roof areas need replaced. Splitting of the membrane is a definite sign that the membrane is failing. Overall Roof Condition:Poor Recommendation:Replace Attachment number 2 Page 3 of 10 Item # 9 Facility Photo Confirmation Inspection Date:05/05/2008 Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Photo Box Photo Notes Several air conditioning units are located on the lower roof area (runway side). Photo Box Photo Notes Lower area roof Built Up Roof System. Attachment number 2 Page 4 of 10 Item # 9 Facility Photo Confirmation Inspection Date:05/05/2008 Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Photo Box Photo Notes The metal area where thepaint is peeling is actually a gutter. Photo Box Photo Notes This is what it looks like 'up top'. This will need to be addressed. Attachment number 2 Page 5 of 10 Item # 9 Facility Photo Confirmation Inspection Date:05/05/2008 Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Photo Box Photo Notes This PVC pipe will pose a challenge. It serves as a drainage pipe right now. Photo Box Photo Notes HVAC need to have properly built curbs. Attachment number 2 Page 6 of 10 Item # 9 Facility Photo Confirmation Inspection Date:05/05/2008 Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Photo Box Photo Notes Photo taken of the barrel roof (high elevation). Photo Box Photo Notes Metal vent cap is in very poor condition. Attachment number 2 Page 7 of 10 Item # 9 Facility Photo Confirmation Inspection Date:05/05/2008 Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Photo Box Photo Notes This pitch pocket has been a source of some leaks. Photo Box Photo Notes A new gutter edge will need to be added at the perimeter. Attachment number 2 Page 8 of 10 Item # 9 Facility Photo Confirmation Inspection Date:05/05/2008 Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Photo Box Photo Notes Chances are some of the wood decking will need to be replaced. Photo Box Photo Notes This is a photo of areas that have already been addressed with new wood decking. Attachment number 2 Page 9 of 10 Item # 9 Solution Options Client Name:City of Augusta Facility Name:Daniel Field Airport Roof Section:All Square Feet:30,000 Estimated Cost of Solution Chosen: $ 310,000.00 Recommended Action Year: Year 1: 2008 Recommended Solution: Replace Replace Options Replace Option 1 Expected Life: 10-12 Years Cost Estimate: $230,000.00 Single ply roof system over rigid board insulation. Replace Option 2 Expected Life: 30+ Years Cost Estimate: $310,000.00 Multiple ply High Performance Modified Roof System. Replace Option 3 Expected Life: 30+ Years Cost Estimate: $425,000.00 High Performance Metal Roof System. Expected Life is an average, assuming that a proper evaluation & maintenance program is performed on a yearly basis. Attachment number 2 Page 10 of 10 Item # 9 Roof Types Built up Roofing (Asphalt) Built up Roofing (Coal tar) EPDM TPO / PVC Generic Modified Bitumen High Performance Modifieds Traffic Resistance Good Good Poor Poor Good Excellent Thickness Multi-ply - excellent Multi-ply – excellent One ply – poor One ply poor Two ply – Good Multi-ply- Excellent Flexibility Fair Fair Excellent Good Fair Good Chemical resistance Good Excellent Poor oil resistance Fair Fair Good Quality Control Good (Redundancy) Good (Redundancy) Poor One ply No supervision Poor Fair Excellent (Redundancy) Daily supervision Life Cycle Good Very Good Poor Poor Fair Excellent Track Record Varies – Good 20 years Very Good 25 years Poor 8 – 12 years Fair 10 – 12 years Fair 12 – 15 years Excellent 30 + years Fatigue Resistance Poor Poor Good Good Poor Excellent Notes: 1. Asphalt built up roofs are constructed with ply felts made with asphalt-impregnated fiberglass and mopping asphalt such as Type III steep asphalt. Generally, these roofs consist of 4 plies of felt installed in shingle fashion. The surface is a flood coat of asphalt and aggregate. Asphalt is not a true waterproofer and depends on positive slope in order to maintain its integrity. 2. A coal tar pitch built up roof is a roof constructed with plies felts made with coal tar-impregnated fiberglass and mopping asphalt such as Type II Coal Tar. Generally, these roofs consist of 4 plies of felt installed in shingle fashion. The surface is always a flood coat of coal tar and aggregate. Coal tar is a true waterproofer although it is also a known carcinogen. Modified coal tars are more environmentally correct. 3. EPDM is an acronym for Ethylene Propylene Dione Monomer. It entered the roofing market in the 1970’s and gained as much as 50% market share in the 80’s. Since then, its performance history has lead to a steep decline in market share. Seams are glued with an adhesive similar to a bicycle tire patch kit adhesive and are affected by heat and moisture. EPDM is generally black which absorbs heat and single plies tend to condensate on the underside. 4. TPO / PVC Thermoplastic polyolefin are a modification of the original polyvinyl chloride membranes. PVC membranes were brittle and cracked over time. The TPO’s of today are relatively new and there is little known about their long-term performance. There are no standards that define the exact polymer content. Instead, they should contain “appropriate” polymers. 5. Generic modified asphalt membranes are typically mineral surface sheets of polymer-modified asphalt. The polymer is SBS but there is no minimum percentage of polymer. It is difficult to know exactly what you are getting. Polymer percentage is important for puncture and fatigue resistance. These membranes are typically reinforced with polyester that is not dimensional stable leading to shrinkage and expansion and contraction of the polymer. 6. High performance modifieds contain a high percentage of sophisticated polymers and a high strength reinforcing structure that is dimensionally stable. The polymers provide the weathering and UV resistance and are designed to resist puncture and handle fatigue. The reinforcement has the responsibility of resisting tear, providing puncture resistance and the all-important tensile qualities that have been the key to roofing success for 100 years. 7. Fatigue resistance is an important factor. Membranes with polyester scrims tend to be dynamic with high movement causing fatigue of the compound. Low rubber content compounds that cannot handle the movement and crack compound that problem. Underlayment is typically a single ply base sheet. Item # 9 Invitation to Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until Wednesday, May 13, 2009 at 3:00 P.M. for furnishing: Bid Item 09-112 Roof Replacement @ Daniel Field Hanger for Daniel Field Airport Bids’ will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 706-821-2422 BID documents may be obtained at the office of Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. A Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference will be held on Tuesday, April 28, 2009 @ 2:00 p.m. in the Procurement Department Room 605. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by Thursday, April 30, 2009 @ 3:00 p.m. by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. .No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. No Bid may be withdrawn for a period of 90 days after time has been called on the date of opening. A 10% Bid bond is required to be submitted in a separate envelope so marked along with the bidders’ qualifications; a 100% performance bond and a 100% payment bond will be required for award. Bidders will please note that the number of copies requested; all supporting documents including financial statements and references and such other attachments that may be required by the bid invitation are material conditions of the bid. Any package found incomplete or submitted late shall be rejected by the Procurement Office. Any bidder allegedly contending that he/she has been improperly disqualified from bidding due to an incomplete bid submission shall have the right to appeal to the appropriate committee of the Augusta commission. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle April 2, 9, 16, 23, 2009 Metro Courier April 8, 2009 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Willis Boshears Daniel Field Airport Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 1 Item # 9 Ve n d o r s Ca r o l i n a R o o f i n g 46 7 5 F r a n c h i s e S t r e e t N. C h a r l e s t o n , S C 2 9 4 1 8 Bo n e D r y R o o f i n g 12 0 B e n B u r t o n R o a d Bo g a r t , G A 3 0 6 2 2 So u t h e r n R o o f i n g 51 1 S k y v i e w D r i v e Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 Th o m s o n R o o f i n g P. O . B o x 1 8 5 Th o m s o n , G A 3 0 8 2 4 Ga r y L . M c E l m u r r a y 18 1 O l d J a c k s o n H w y Be e c h I s l a n d , S C 2 9 8 4 2 I a n d E S p e c i a l t i e s 14 1 R i v e r c h a s e W a y Le x i n g t o n , S C 2 9 0 7 2 Co m m e r c i a l R o o f 12 5 T r a d e S t r e e t Bo g a r t , G A 3 0 6 2 2 St a t e m e n t o f N o n - Di s c r i m i n a t i o n Ye s Y e s Ye s Co n f l i c t o f I n t e r e s t Ye s Y e s Ye s Ad d e n d u m 1 Ye s Ye s Ye s Co n t r a c t o r A f f i d a v i t & A g r e e m e n t Ye s No t R e t u r n e d Y e s Su b c o n t r a c t o r Af f i d a v i t Ye s No t R e t u r n e d Y e s No n - C o l l u s i o n Af f i d a v i t o f Bi d d e r / O f f e r o r Ye s No C o r p o r a t e S e a l Y e s No n - C o l l u s i o n Af f i d a v i t o f Su b c o n t r a c t o r Ye s No t R e t u r n e d Y e s Lo c a l S m a l l Bu s i n e s s Go o d F a i t h E f f o r t s Ye s Y e s Ye s Lo c a l S m a l l Bu s i n e s s Su b c o n t r a c t o r / Su p p l i e r Ut i l i z a t i o n P l a n Ye s Y e s Ye s Al t e r n a t e 1 No B i d Bi d I t e m # 0 9 - 1 1 2 Bi d I t e m # 0 9 - 1 1 2 Ro o f R e p l a c e m e n t @ D a n i e l F i e l d H a n g a r fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - D a n i e l F i e l d A i r p o r t Ba s e B i d No n - C o m p l i a n t N o B i d R e s p o n s e Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : W e d n e s d a y , M a y 1 3 , 2 0 0 9 @ 3 : 0 0 p . m . $2 4 9 , 8 8 1 . 0 0 No n - C o m p l i a n t In c o m p l e t e B i d Pa c k a g e No B i d R e s p o n s e N o B i d R e s p o n s e N o B i d R e s p o n s e Bi d B o n d Ye s Y e s Ye s Attachment number 5 Page 1 of 2 Item # 9 Ve n d o r s Mo d e r n R o o f i n g 12 4 1 G o r d o n P a r k R o a d Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 Al l - P r o R o o f i n g 52 1 5 S R o y a l A t l a n t a D r Tu c k e r , G A 3 0 0 8 4 Sk y l i n e C o n s t r u c t i o n 99 6 M i l l e d g e v i l l e R d Ea t o n t o n , G A 3 1 0 2 4 So u t h e a s t e r n R o o f i n g P. O . B o x 4 5 1 St a t e s b o r o , G A 3 0 4 5 9 Yo u n g ' s R o o f i n g 31 1 P a d r i c k S t r e e t Ma r t i n e z , G A 3 0 9 0 7 St a t e m e n t o f N o n - Di s c r i m i n a t i o n Co n f l i c t o f I n t e r e s t Ad d e n d u m 1 Co n t r a c t o r A f f i d a v i t & A g r e e m e n t Su b c o n t r a c t o r Af f i d a v i t No n - C o l l u s i o n Af f i d a v i t o f Bi d d e r / O f f e r o r No n - C o l l u s i o n Af f i d a v i t o f Su b c o n t r a c t o r Lo c a l S m a l l Bu s i n e s s Go o d F a i t h E f f o r t s Lo c a l S m a l l Bu s i n e s s Su b c o n t r a c t o r / Su p p l i e r Ut i l i z a t i o n P l a n Al t e r n a t e 1 Ba s e B i d No B i d R e s p o n s e Ro o f R e p l a c e m e n t @ D a n i e l F i e l d H a n g a r fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - D a n i e l F i e l d A i r p o r t Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : W e d n e s d a y , M a y 1 3 , 2 0 0 9 @ 3 : 0 0 p . m . Bi d B o n d Attachment number 5 Page 2 of 2 Item # 9 Attachment number 6 Page 1 of 2 Item # 9 Attachment number 6 Page 2 of 2 Item # 9 Attachment number 7 Page 1 of 5 Item # 9 Attachment number 7 Page 2 of 5 Item # 9 Attachment number 7 Page 3 of 5 Item # 9 Attachment number 7 Page 4 of 5 Item # 9 Attachment number 7 Page 5 of 5 Item # 9 Attachment number 8 Page 1 of 1 Item # 9 Public Service Committee Meeting 6/8/2009 12:30 PM Seabury Airline Planning Group, LLC Contract Department:Augusta Regional Airport Caption:Motion to approve the contract with Seabury Airline Planning Group, LLC as the airport Air Service Consultant Agency of choice. Background:Seabury Airline Planning Group, LLC, through the RFQ process and with the approval of the Procurement Department, Aviation Commission and the Augusta Richmond County Commission, was selected as the airport Airline Consulting Agency. Analysis: Financial Impact:All work done by Seabury Airline Planning Group, LLC will be at the request of the airport and invoiced accordingly. Alternatives:Deny request. Recommendation:Approve request. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 551 08 1111 5212999 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Augusta Regional Airport Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 10 1 AUGUSTA REGIONAL AIRPORT CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT FOR AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT WITH SEABURY AIRLINE PLANNING GROUP, LLC This contract made and entered into this_____ day of ___________ by and between AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, a political subdivision of the State of Georgia, acting through the AUGUSTA AVIATION COMMISSION whose address is 1501 Aviation Way, Augusta Regional Airport at Bush Field, Augusta, Georgia 30906-9600, hereinafter referred to as the CLIENT, and SEABURY AIRLINE PLANNING GROUP, LLC., hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT. WHEREAS, the Augusta Regional Airport has expressed a need for assistance in identifying local passenger air service needs, threats, opportunities and in preparing market analyses and air service proposals; and WHEREAS, the CLIENT received proposals from several qualified firms in response to its Request For Qualifications (RFQ); and WHEREAS, after reviewing the proposals the CLIENT determined in would be in its best interest to enter into an agreement with CONSULTANT to provide these services. WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT has represented to the CLIENT that it has expertise in providing general advisory and professional consulting services and assistance in connection with air service market research, including the development of traffic data bases for presentation of air service proposals and the necessary personnel to execute the services provided herein; and WHEREAS, on , 2009 the Augusta Richmond County Board of Commissioners approved the solicitation of these services for the Augusta Regional Airport (hereinafter AGS). Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 13 Item # 10 2 STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATION NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, CONSULTANT and the CLIENT, intending to be legally bound, do hereby covenant and agree as follows: SECTION I -- SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED 1.1 The proposal submitted by CONSULTANT and RFQ 09-056 Air Services CONSULTANT Services are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference as if fully set forth herein. 1.2 CONSULTANT may provide to the CLIENT research and development consulting services and other such services as may, from time to time be specifically requested and authorized by the CLIENT. 1.3 CONSULTANT may provide general advisory and professional consulting services and assistance to the CLIENT in connection with air service market research, including the development of traffic data bases for presentation of air service proposals within the context of Section I hereof, subject to the general conditions of Section II. 1.4 CONSULTANT may provide assistance in identifying local passenger air service needs, threats, opportunities and in preparing market analyses and air service proposals. 1.5 CONSULTANT may provide market analyses and service proposals for maintaining the current level of air service. 1.6 CONSULTANT may provide market analyses and service proposal for new non-stop jet service to the two destinations not current served from AGS. 1.7 CONSULTANT may examine the potential of low cost air service at AGS. 1.8 CONSULTANT may provide services related to the lowering of fares and the reduction in Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 13 Item # 10 3 leakage. 1.9 CONSULTANT may provide other services which might include, but not be limited to: a. performance of studies, analyses, and research; b. participation in meetings with the CLIENT's staff and others; c. preparation of materials for presentation to airlines and interested local parties; and provision of other general advisory services and assistance. 1.10. COORDINATION. CONSULTANT shall provide continuing coordination with the CLIENT to ensure the applicability of findings with respect to specific local conditions and thH&/,(17¶VSROLFLHVDQGJRDOV SECTION II GENERAL CONDITIONS 2.1. TERM. The initial term of this agreement will commence upon the date of execution and will continue in effect for a period of two (2) years. This agreement may be renewed or extended for three (3) additional one (1) year options upon mutual consent of both parties with all terms and conditions remaining the same. 2.2 TERMINATION. The CLIENT may cancel this contract any time for breach of contractual obligations by providing written notice of such cancellation. Should the CLIENT exercise its right to cancel the contract for such reasons, the cancellation shall become effective on the date as specified in the notice of cancellation. Furthermore, the CLIENT may terminate this agreement at any time upon the giving of written notice as follows: a) In the event that the CONSULTANT fails to discharge any obligations or remedy any default or breach under this agreement for a period continuing more than thirty (30) days after the providing written notice specifying such failure or default and that such failure or default continues to exist as of the date upon which such notice so terminating this agreement is given; or Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 13 Item # 10 4 b) In the event that the CONSULTANT makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or commences or has commenced against it any proceeding in bankruptcy, insolvency, or reorganization pursuant to bankruptcy laws or laws of GHEWRU¶VPRUDWRULXPRU c) In the event that appropriate and otherwise unobligated funds are no longer available to satisfy the obligations of CLIENT. 2.3 WORK AUTHORIZATION. Each assignment performed under Section I will be initiated upon the specific written or verbal request and authorization of the CLIENT. 2.4 BASIC DATA PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT. The CLIENT will assist the CONSULTANT in obtaining such data and information as are needed and available. 2.5. CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE. To expedite the undertaking of services performed under this contract and to permit the coordination of materials, commitments, and correspondence, the CLIENT will designate a specific staff member as its representative to whom all correspondence, materials, and requests for conferences and information will be directed. The CLIENT designates Diane Johnston, Director of Marketing, (706) 796-4002, as its representative to whom all correspondence should be directed. SECTION III. CONSIDERATION/FEES 3.1 CLIENT shall pay to CONSULTANT the fees and expenses as set forth on Exhibit A DWWDFKHGKHUHWR WKH³5DWH6FKHGXOHV´ 7KHUDWHVDVVHW forth in Exhibit A shall be in effect for the duration of this agreement. The fees to be paid to CONSULTANT for services under this contract will be determined either on the actual time and materials expended on the work or on a per project basis, depending on the nature of the assignment requested and will be subject to CLIENT acceptance and approval for each assignment. 3.2 Out of pocket expenses for costs such as printing, data bases, long distance telephone calls, Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 13 Item # 10 5 transportation, and subsistence will be billed in addition at actual cost, and will be subject to acceptance and approval by the CLIENT. CLIENT reserves the right to require documentation of such costs and the ability to dispute such charges if determined to be unreasonable. SECTION IV. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT hereby represents and warrants to the CLIENT as follows: 4.1 EXISTENCE AND POWERS. CONSULTANT is a corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of Virginia and is duly qualified to do business in the State of Georgia, with full power, authority and legal right to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. 4.2 DUE AUTHORIZATION AND BINDING OBLIGATION. This Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by CONSULTANT and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of CONSULTANT, enforceable against CONSULTANT in accordance with its terms, except to the extent its enforceability may be limited by (i) applicable bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws affecting enforcement of creditors' rights or remedies generally, (ii) general equitable principles concerning remedies, and (iii) limitations on the enforceability of rights to indemnification by federal or State laws or regulations or public policy. 4.3 NO CONFLICT. To its knowledge, neither the execution nor delivery of this Agreement by CONSULTANT, nor the performance by CONSULTANT of its obligations hereunder (i) conflicts with, violates or results in a material breach of any law or governmental regulation applicable to CONSULTANT, (ii) conflicts with, violates or results in a material breach of any term or condition of any order, judgment or decree, or any contract, agreement or Attachment number 1 Page 5 of 13 Item # 10 6 instrument, to which CONSULTANT is a party or by which CONSULTANT or any of its properties or assets are bound, or constitutes a material default under any of the foregoing, or (iii) constitutes a default under or results in the creation of, any lien, charge, encumbrance or security interest upon any assets of CONSULTANT under any agreement or instrument to which CONSULTANT is a party or by which CONSULTANT or its assets may be bound or affected. 4.4 NO APPROVALS REQUIRED. No approval, authorization, order or consent of, or declaration, registration or filing with, any Governmental Authority is required for the valid execution and delivery of this Agreement by CONSULTANT or the performance of its obligations hereunder, except such as have been duly obtained or made. 4.5 FINANCIAL CONDITION. There has been no material adverse change in the financial condition of CONSULTANT that would impair the ability of CONSULTANT to perform its obligations under this Agreement. 4.6 NO COLLUSION. &2168/7$17¶V3URSRVDOLVJHQXLQHDQGQRWFROOXVLYHRUDVKDP CONSULTANT has not colluded, conspired, connived or agreed, directly or indirectly, with any other person, to put in a sham proposal, or to refrain from proposing, and has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought, by agreement, collusion, communication or conference with any SHUVRQWRIL[WKHSULFHVRI&2168/7$17¶V3URSRVDORUWKHSURSRVDOVRIDQ\RWKHU3HUVRQRUWR secure any advantage against any Person interested in this Agreement. 4.7 INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY CONSULTANT. The information supplied and representations and warranties made by CONSULTANT and in all submittals made in response to the RFQ LQFOXGLQJ &2168/7$17¶V 3URSRVDO DQG LQ DOO SRVW-proposal submittals with respect to CONSULTANT (and, to its knowledge, all information supplied in such submittals Attachment number 1 Page 6 of 13 Item # 10 7 with respect to any Subsidiary or Subcontractor) are true, correct and complete in all material UHVSHFWV&2168/7$17¶V3URSRVDOGRHVQRWFRQWDLQDQ\XQWUXHVWDWHPHQWRIDPDWHULDOIDFWRU omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein, or necessary in order to make the statements therein not misleading. 4.8 ETHICS: GRATUITIES AND KICKBACKS. Neither CONSULTANT, any subsidiary, or any agent or other representative of CONSULTANT has given or agreed to give, any employee or former employee of the CLIENT or any other person, a gratuity or an offer of employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, preparation or any part of a procurement requirement or a purchase request, influencing the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any proceeding or application, request for ruling, determination, claim or controversy, or other particular matter pertaining to any procurement requirement or a contract or subcontract, or to any solicitation or proposal for a contract or subcontract. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, for the breach or violation of this representation and warranty and upon a finding after notice and hearing, the CLIENT may terminate this Agreement. 4.9 CONTINGENT FEES. CONSULTANT has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement; and CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any company, association, corporation, firm or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this representation and warranty and upon a finding after notice and hearing, the COUNTY may terminate this Attachment number 1 Page 7 of 13 Item # 10 8 Agreement and, at its discretion, may deduct from fees or otherwise recover, the full amount of any such fee, commission, percentage, gift or consideration. SECTION V. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.1. CONSULTANT will promptly observe and comply with applicable provisions of all published federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations which govern or apply to the services rendered by CONSULTANT herein, or to the wages paid by CONSULTANT to its employees. 5.2. CONSULTANT will procure and keep in force during the term of this agreement all necessary licenses, registrations, certificates, permits, and other authorizations as are required herein. 5.3. All reports, documents, data bases, computer programs, and other deliverable products produced by CONSULTANT for sole purpose of CLIENT under the terms of this agreement will at all times be the exclusive property of the CLIENT. 5.4 GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement and any questions concerning its validity, construction or performance shall be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia, irrespective of the place of execution or the place or places of performance. 5.6 COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 5.7 SEVERABILITY. In the event that any part, provision or term of this Agreement shall, for any reason, be determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith and agree to such amendments, modifications, or supplements of or to this Agreement or such other appropriate actions as shall, to the maximum extent practicable in light of such determination, implement and give effect to the intentions of the Parties as reflected Attachment number 1 Page 8 of 13 Item # 10 9 herein, and the other provisions of this Agreement shall, as so amended, modified, supplemented, or otherwise affected by such action, remain in full force and effect. 5.8 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. This Agreement is intended to be solely for the benefit of CONSULTANT and the CLIENT and their respective successors and permitted assigns and is not intended to and shall not confer any rights or benefits on any Person not a signatory hereto. 5.9 CLIENT APPROVALS AND CONSENTS. When this Agreement shall require any approval or consent by the CLIENT to a CONSULTANT submission, request or report, the DSSURYDORUFRQVHQWVKDOOEHJLYHQE\WKH&/,(17¶V$XWKRUL]HG5HSUHVHQWDWLYHLQZULWLQJDQG such writing shall be conclusive evidence of such approval or consent, subject only to compliance by the CLIENT with the applicable law that generally governs its affairs. Unless expressly stated otherwise in this Agreement, and except for requests, reports and submittals made by the CONSULTANT that do not, by their terms or the terms of this Agreement, require a response or action, if the CLIENT does not find a request, report or submittal acceptable, it shall provide written response to CONSULTANT describing its objections and the reasons therefore ZLWKLQWKLUW\  GD\VRIWKH&/,(17¶VUHFHLSWWKHUHRI,IQRUHVSRQVHLVUHFHLYHGWKHUHTXHVW report or submittal shall be deemed rejected. 5.10 NOTICES AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. All notices, consents, approvals or communications required or permitted hereunder shall be and may be relied upon when in writing and shall be (i) transmitted by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, with notice deemed to be given upon receipt, or (ii) delivered by hand or nationally recognized courier service, or (iii) sent by facsimile transmission with confirmed receipt thereof, with a hard copy thereof transmitted pursuant to (i) or (ii) above. All such notices, consents, approvals or communications shall be addressed as follows: Attachment number 1 Page 9 of 13 Item # 10 10 For CLIENT: Augusta Regional Airport 1501 Aviation Way Augusta, Georgia 30909 Attn: Diane Johnston, Director of Marketing and Communications For CONSULTANT: Seabury Airline Planning Group 12012 Sunset Hill Road, Suite 1445 Arlington, Virginia 22201 Attn: 5.11 NONDISCRIMINATION. During the performance of services under this contract, CONSULTANT agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin. CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin. Such action will include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 5.12 INDEMNIFICATION. CONSULTANT hereby agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend the CLIENT, its members, officers and employees, against any claim, action, loss, damage, injury (whether mental or physical, and including death to persons, or damage to property), liability, cost and expense of whatsoever kind or nature including, but not by way of OLPLWDWLRQDWWRUQH\V¶IHHVDQGFRXUWFosts, caused by negligent acts or acts of commission or omission by CONSULTANT its officers, employees, sub consultants, or other representatives. Attachment number 1 Page 10 of 13 Item # 10 11 To the extent permitted by law, CLIENT hereby agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend the CONSULTANT, its members, officers and employees, against any claim, action, loss, damage, injury (whether mental or physical, and including death to persons, or damage to property), liability, cost and expense of whatsoever kind or nature including, but not by way of OLPLWDWLRQDWWRUQH\V¶IHHVDQGFRXUWFRVWVFDXVHGE\QHJOLJHQWDFWVRUDFWVRIFRPPLVVLRQRU omission by CLIENT its officers, employees, sub consultants, or other representatives. SECTION VI. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and will supersede and replace all prior agreements or understandings, written or oral, in relation to the matters set forth herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, SEABURY APG hereby affirms the completeness and accuracy of all of the information provided by it in its proposal to the CLIENT in pursuit of this agreement. Attachment number 1 Page 11 of 13 Item # 10 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed and their seals to be affixed hereto as of the day and year first above written. CLIENT: By: _____________________________ For: Augusta Regional Airport 1501 Aviation Way Augusta, Georgia 30909 CONSULTANT: By: For: Seabury Airline Planning Group 12012 Sunset Hill Road, Suite 1445 Arlington, Virginia 22201 Attachment number 1 Page 12 of 13 Item # 10 Attachment number 1 Page 13 of 13 Item # 10 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Request for Qualifications will be received at this office until Thursday, March 5, 2009 @ 3:00 p.m. FOR FURNISHING: RFQ ITEM #09-055 Advertising Agency for Augusta Regional Airport RFQ ITEM #09-056 Air Service Consultant for Augusta Regional Airport RFQs will be received by: The Augusta Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams, Director Augusta Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 RFQ documents may be examined at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by Friday, February 20, 2009 @ 3:00 p.m. by fax at 706-821- 2811 or by mail. No RFQ will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference on an eligible local project, the certification statement as a local bidder and all supporting documents must be submitted to the Procurement Department with your bonafide bid package. No RFQ may be withdrawn for a period of 90 days after time has been called on the date of opening. Bidders will please note that the number of copies requested; all supporting documents including financial statements and references and such other attachments that may be required by the bid invitation are material conditions of the bid. Any package found incomplete or submitted late shall be rejected by the Procurement Office. Any bidder allegedly contending that he/she has been improperly disqualified from bidding due to an incomplete bid submission shall have the right to appeal to the appropriate committee of the Augusta Commission. Please mark RFQ number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of RFQ documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of RFQ documents from unauthorized sources places the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle January 29, February 5, 12, 19, 2009 Metro Courier February 4, 2009 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Tammy Strange Augusta Regional Airport Diane Johnston Augusta Regional Airport Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 10 Vendors:Original 7 Copies Fee Structure Addendum 1 Mead & Hunt 28829 Lockheed Drive Suite 2A Eugene, OR 97402 SH & E 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 Seabury Aviation Planning 1919 Gallows Road, Suite 550 Vienna, VA 22182 Yes Yes Yes Yes Sixel Consulting Group 1180 West 15th Avenue Eugene, OR 97402 Yes Yes Yes Yes Boyd Group 78 Beaver Brook Canyon Road Evergreen, CO 80439 Sabre Airline Solutions 115 West Peachtree Place NW Atlanta, GA 30313 InterVISTAS Consulting 1615 L Street NW Washington, DC 20036 TranSystems 2400 Pershing Road, Suite 400 Kansas City, MO 64108 Jacobs Consultancy 555 Airport Boulevard Suite 300 Burlingame, CA 94010 No Bid Response Non-Compliant Failed to Properly Execute the Contractor Affidavit & Agreement Form, Statement of Non-Discrimination Form, Non-Collusion Affidavit of Bidder/Offeror Form, and LSB Subcontractor/Supplier Utilization Plan Non-Compliant Failed to submit the Contractor Affidavit & Agreement Form, Subcontractor Affidavit Form, Non-Collusion Affidavit of Bidder/Offeror, Non-Collusion Affidavit of Subcontractor Form, and LSB Forms RFQ Item #09-056 Air Service Consultant For the City of Augusta - Augusta Regional Airport RFQ Opening Date: Thursday, March 5, 2009 at 3:00 P.M. Non-Compliant Failed to Properly Execute the Contractor Affidavit & Agreement Form Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 1 Item # 10 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 1 Item # 10 Attachment number 5 Page 1 of 1 Item # 10 Attachment number 6 Page 1 of 2 Item # 10 Attachment number 6 Page 2 of 2 Item # 10 Attachment number 7 Page 1 of 3 Item # 10 Attachment number 7 Page 2 of 3 Item # 10 Attachment number 7 Page 3 of 3 Item # 10