Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017-03-07 Meeting Agenda
Commission Meeting Agenda Commission Chamber 3/7/2017 2:00 PM INVOCATION:Pastor Marty Baker, Lead Pastor Stevens Creek Church . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. RECOGNITION(S) Commissioners Certifications A. Congratulations! Commissioners Sean Frantom, Ben Hasan and Sammie Sias on completing the required course work to obtain your first level of certification through the Georgia Municipal Association and the University of Georgia Carl Vinson Institute of Government Municipal Training Institute. Attachments Employee of the Month B. Congratulations! March 2017 Employee of the Month. Attachments Five (5) minute time limit per delegation DELEGATIONS C.Mr. Bill Lockett RE: Soliciting support for Augusta's Age Friendly Initiative. Presentation will include information on Walk Augusta Audit; City-Wide Cleanup Proposal; and a trip to Macon-Bibb County to review their successful Age Friendly Program. Attachments CONSENT AGENDA (Items 1-39) PLANNING 1. SA-52 – A request for concurrence with the Augusta Planning Attachments Commission to approve a petition to amend Section 400-H – Standard for Streets and Roadway, Street Right-of-Way Widths of the Subdivision Regulations for Augusta, Georgia by updating standards to be consistent with the Augusta Engineering Street and Road Technical Manual. (Approved by the Commission February 21, 2017-second reading) PUBLIC SERVICES 2.Motion to approve New Location: A.N. 17-6: request by Barethea Walker for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer and Wine License to be used in connection with Smokin Aces located at 2510-B Peach Orchard Rd. There will be Dance. District 2. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 3.Motion to approve New Application: A.N. 17-7: a request by Ahmed Said Mohammad Ashel for an on premise consumption Liquor License to be used in connection with Sharifa's Hookah Bar and Lounge located at 730 Broad Street. District 1. Super District 9.(Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 4.Motion to approve application A.N. 17-8: request by Gabriel Echevarria for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer and Wine License to be used in connection with Augusta Exchange Stadium 20 & IMAX d/b/a Regal Cinemas located at 1144 Agerton Lane. There will be Sunday Sales. District 3. Super District 10.(Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 5.Motion to approve New Location: A.N. 17-9: a request by Robyn Jarrett for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer and Wine License to be used in connection with The Scene located at 1289 Broad Street. There will be Dance. District 1. Super District 9(Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) . Attachments 6.Motion to approve an award of contract for Bid Item #17-136, HVAC Automation System Upgrade, for Diamond Lake Community Center to Trane Commercial Systems for $127,234.00.(Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 7.Motion to approve a request from the Augusta Fire Chief for the acquisition of one Ford F-150 for an additional Arson Investigator. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 8.Motion to deny a request from the Senior Pastor of First United Pentecostal Church of Augusta, Reverend Mark Maddox, for the donation of two paratransit vehicles and one bus for the First United Pentecostal Church of Augusta.(Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 9.Motion to approve a request from the Richmond County Sheriff’s Office to replace 34 Road Patrol cars, 2 Traffic cars and 7 Criminal Investigation cars using SPLOST VII – Public Safety Vehicles. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 10.Motion to approve five (5) annual bid items. The items require Commission approval due to the fact that purchases on the individual items will exceed $25,000.00. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 11.Motion to approve a request from the Head Coach & Director of the Augusta Boxing Club for a donation of one 28-passenger bus in order to transport members of the Augusta Boxing Club to and from competitions. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 12.Motion to approve a request from Fleet Management for the replacement of four Marshal’s Office vehicles, purchase one new vehicle and to replace one vehicle in the Probation Office using SPLOST Phase VII – Public Safety Vehicles. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 13.Motion to approve Resolution of Support - Operation Teammate. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, Attachments 2017) PUBLIC SAFETY 14.Motion to approve the Hazard Mitigation Plan Update provided by Atkins North America, Inc. and authorize the Mayor to execute the Updated Hazard Mitigation Plan following the 30-day public review period. (Approved by Public Safety Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 15.Motion to provide a 60-day notice to the Magistrate judges that the City of Augusta plans to change the in-house probation order and request a meeting with the judges within ten days of the approval by the Commission.(Approved by Public Safety Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments FINANCE 16.Motion to accept the 2017 Summer Intern Program $4000 Grant from Civic Affairs Foundation. (Approved by Finance Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 17.Motion to approve a request from Mr. Patrick Feistel of the Garden City Rescue Mission for an abatement of taxes for the tax year 2016. (Approved by Finance Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 18.Motion to approve agreement with Augusta Coliseum Authority for funding as authorized in SPLOST Phase VII. (Approved by Finance Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments ENGINEERING SERVICES 19.Motion to approve supplementing the Augusta Utilities Department contract with Blair Construction, Inc., not to exceed $114,945 to cover the additional costs of water line relocation for the 15th Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 20.Motion to approve and authorize the Engineering Department (AED) to Attachments accept and receive federal financial assistance through Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Implication Grant Program. Also, grant authorization permitting the Augusta, GA’s Mayor to sign all documentation as requested by the AED.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) 21.Motion to approve award of preliminary engineering phase of Design Consultant Services Agreement to Civil Services, Inc., in the amount of $200,916.27 for the 5th Street Bridge over the Savannah River (Bridge Repair and Restoration), subject to receipt of signed Agreement as requested by AED.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 22.Motion to determine that the alley between Hogan Street and Adrian Street, as shown on the attached plat has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public purpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities as directed by Augusta Engineering Department and Augusta Utilities Department. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 23.Motion to approve entering into a Mowing and Maintenance and Indemnity Agreement with the Georgia Department of Transportation. Also, obtain a GDOT Permit for Gordon Hwy at Doug Barnard Entryway Landscape Improvements Project as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 24.Motion to determine that 0.06 acres adjacent to 1507 Saint Luke Street, shown as “Tract B” on the attached plat has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public purpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities as directed by Augusta Engineering Department and Augusta Utilities Department. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 25.Motion to approve Tower Cloud, Inc.’s Formal Registration Application to access the public right of way within the Augusta, Georgia for the provisions of telecommunications services as a State-Certified Utility. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 26.Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-134-00-0) - 2017 Walnut Street.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 27.Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-192-00-0) - 167 Aragon Drive. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 28.Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-193-00-0) - 173 Aragon Drive.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 29.Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-055-00-0) – 2029 Golden Rod Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 30.Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-056-00-0) - 2033 Golden Rod Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 31.Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-072-00-0) - 2061 Golden Rod Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 32.Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-073-00-0) - 2063 Golden Rod Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 33.Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 088-1-032-00-0) - 149 Aragon Drive. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 34.Motion to determine that a portion of Heath Street, East of Berckmans Road as shown on the attached plat has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public purpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities as directed by Augusta Engineering Department and Augusta Utilities Department.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments 35.Motion to approve the amount of $7,108.72 to have 17 Streetlights added to Ashton Drive and Ardwick Drive in the Southampton subdivision at a cost of $255.00 per month for a total of $3,060.00 per year thereafter. This is also to approve a new lighting tax district for the 52 lots associated with above roads. Funding is available in the Street Lighting budget account #2760416105312310.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 36.Motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Commission held February 21, 2017 and Special Called meeting held February 28, 2017. Attachments APPOINTMENT(S) 37.Motion to approve the appointment of Ms. Janmarie Hall to the Augusta Animal Control Citizens Advisory Board effective April 1, 2017 representing District 3. Attachments 38.Motion to approve the appointment of Dr. Charles Larke- Augusta Aviation Commission; Ms. Marian T. Brown-Augusta Public Library Board of Trustees and Ms. Barbara Gordon- ARC Zoning & Appeals Attachments Board representing District 5. 39.Motion to approve the appointment of Ms. Monica R. Mack to the Citizens Small Business Advisory Board representing District 6. Attachments ****END CONSENT AGENDA**** AUGUSTA COMMISSION 3/7/2017 AUGUSTA COMMISSION REGULAR AGENDA 3/7/2017 (Items 40-47) PLANNING 40. Z-16-41 – Reconsideration of a request by the Augusta Planning Commission to approve, with the conditions stated below, a petition by Stanley Mack, on behalf of Stanley and Shelley Mack, requesting a Special Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section 26-1 (h) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta, Georgia affecting property containing .31 acres and known as 3603 Richdale Drive. Tax Map 143-0-277-00-0 DISTRICT 6 1. The home shall be staffed in three (3) 8-hour shifts on a 7-day, 24-hour basis with no staff sleeping in the home. 2. A private room shall be provided for staff to conduct business. 3. No more than six (6) clients are permitted to reside in the home based on the number and size of the existing bedrooms. 4. In order to continue to maintain a local business license, the applicant must continue to maintain a license with the State of Georgia, proof of compliance with the minimum requirements of Chapter 111.8-62.01 of the O.C.G.A must be provided, and the applicant must provide updated fire department compliance for six (6) clients. All requirements must be met within six (6) months of approval of this Special Exception request, or the Special Exception is void. 5. If wheelchair bound persons reside in the residence all 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design requirements must be met, including but not limited to: · All doorways must be at least 3 feet. wide. · At least one bathroom that permits a wheelchair dependent person to use all bathroom facilities unimpeded. 6. All conditions must be met prior to issuance of a local business license. (Approved by Commission Attachments January 17, 2017) PUBLIC SERVICES 41.Discuss Jamestown Community Center. (Requested by Commissioner Marion Williams) Attachments ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 42.Discuss scheduling a Commission Work Session regarding the establishment of Personal Care Homes in Augusta, GA. (Requested by Commissioner Ben Hasan) Attachments 43.Discuss/update from Administration regarding the electrical system at the Augusta Common. (Requested by Commissioner Marion Williams) Attachments 44.Discuss a resolution changing the name of the John C. Calhoun Expressway. (No recommendation from Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Attachments APPOINTMENT(S) 45.Motion to approve the reappointment of Mr. Brad Owens to the Augusta Urban Redevelopment Board. (Requested by Commissioner Sean Frantom Attachments ADMINISTRATOR 46.Update/presentation on Augusta's community awareness efforts e.g. Environmental Services Department's March 25th "Great Augusta Cleanup and Recycling Block Party" event. Attachments LEGAL MEETING A. Pending and Potential Litigation. B. Real Estate. Upcoming Meetings www.augustaga.gov C. Personnel. 47.Motion to approve execution by the Mayor of the affidavit of compliance with Georgia's Open Meeting Act. Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Invocation Department: Department: Caption: Pastor Marty Baker, Lead Pastor Stevens Creek Church . Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Commissioners Certifications Department: Department: Caption: Congratulations! Commissioners Sean Frantom, Ben Hasan and Sammie Sias on completing the required course work to obtain your first level of certification through the Georgia Municipal Association and the University of Georgia Carl Vinson Institute of Government Municipal Training Institute. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Employee of the Month Department: Department: Caption: Congratulations! March 2017 Employee of the Month. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Augusta's Age Friendly Initiative Department: Department: Caption:Mr. Bill Lockett RE: Soliciting support for Augusta's Age Friendly Initiative. Presentation will include information on Walk Augusta Audit; City-Wide Cleanup Proposal; and a trip to Macon- Bibb County to review their successful Age Friendly Program. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM SA-52 - Land Subdivision Regulation Amendment Department:Planning and Development Department:Planning and Development Caption: SA-52 – A request for concurrence with the Augusta Planning Commission to approve a petition to amend Section 400-H – Standard for Streets and Roadway, Street Right-of-Way Widths of the Subdivision Regulations for Augusta, Georgia by updating standards to be consistent with the Augusta Engineering Street and Road Technical Manual. (Approved by the Commission February 21, 2017-second reading) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Alcohol Application Department:Planning & Development Department:Planning & Development Caption:Motion to approve New Location: A.N. 17-6: request by Barethea Walker for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer and Wine License to be used in connection with Smokin Aces located at 2510-B Peach Orchard Rd. There will be Dance. District 2. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:This is a New Location. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the City of Augusta's Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a fee of $4,486.00. Alternatives: Recommendation:The Planning & Development recommends approval. The R.C.S.O. recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Law Administrator Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Alcohol Application Department:Planning & Development Department:Planning & Development Caption:Motion to approve New Application: A.N. 17-7: a request by Ahmed Said Mohammad Ashel for an on premise consumption Liquor License to be used in connection with Sharifa's Hookah Bar and Lounge located at 730 Broad Street. District 1. Super District 9.(Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:This is a New Application. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the City of Augusta's Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a fee of $3,115.00. Alternatives: Recommendation:The Planning & Development recommends approval. The R.C.S.O. recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Law Administrator Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Alcohol Application Department:Planning & Development Department:Planning & Development Caption:Motion to approve application A.N. 17-8: request by Gabriel Echevarria for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer and Wine License to be used in connection with Augusta Exchange Stadium 20 & IMAX d/b/a Regal Cinemas located at 1144 Agerton Lane. There will be Sunday Sales. District 3. Super District 10. (Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:This is a New Location. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the City of Augusta's alcohol ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a fee of $5,990.00. Alternatives: Recommendation:The Planning & Development recommends approval. The R.C.S.O. recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Alcohol Application Department:Planning & Development Department:Planning & Development Caption:Motion to approve New Location: A.N. 17-9: a request by Robyn Jarrett for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer and Wine License to be used in connection with The Scene located at 1289 Broad Street. There will be Dance. District 1. Super District 9(Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) . Background:This is a New Location. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the City of Augusta's Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a fee of $4,656.00. Alternatives: Recommendation:The Planning & Development recommends approval. The R.C.S.O. recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Law Administrator Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Bid Item 17-136, HVAC Automation Upgrade for Diamond Lakes Community Center Department:Recreation and Parks Department:Recreation and Parks Caption:Motion to approve an award of contract for Bid Item #17-136, HVAC Automation System Upgrade, for Diamond Lake Community Center to Trane Commercial Systems for $127,234.00.(Approved by Public Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The existing HVAC control system currently in place at the Diamond Lakes Community Center is an Automated Logic Corporation, (ALC) control system installed in 2005. The automation system failed and is not operating in accordance with the original design. Analysis:In an effort to address an operating and efficient automated control system and to achieve a comfortable building environment through a reliable building management system that will help staff monitor and improve system performance, bids were solicited for a new automated HVAC control system. Bids were received from four (4) vendors. The low responsive bidder to meet all specifications and materials requested contained in the Request for Bid is Trane Commercial Systems. Financial Impact:Total bid amount is $127,234.00 Alternatives:1. To approve the new HVAC Automation upgrade for Diamond Lakes Community Center to Trane Commercial Systems for $127,234. 2. Move No Action. Recommendation:1. Move to Approve. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 272061110 – Recreation Capital Outlay Cover Memo REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Invitation to Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until Thursday, January 19, 2017 @ 11:00 a.m. for furnishing: Bid Item # Item #17-136 HVAC Automation System Upgrade for Diamond Lake Community Center Building for Augusta Recreation and Parks Department Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams, Director Augusta Procurement Department 535 Telfair Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 Bid documents may be viewed on the Augusta, Georgia web site under the Procurement Department ARCbid. Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 535 Telfair Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. A Mandatory Pre Bid Conference will be held on Thursday, January 5, 2017 @ 11:00 a.m. in the Procurement Department, 535 Telfair Street, Room 605. All questions must be submitted in writing by fax to 706 821-2811 or by email to procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov to the office of the Procurement Department by Friday, January 6, 2017 @ 5:00 P.M. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days after bids have been opened, pending the execution of contract with the successful bidder. A 100% performance bond and a 100% payment bond will be required for award. Invitation for bids and specifications. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. All requests to waive or modify any such material condition shall be submitted through the Procurement Director to the appropriate committee of the Augusta, Georgia Commission for approval by the Augusta, Georgia Commission. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that acquisition of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Correspondence must be submitted via mail, fax or email as follows: Augusta Procurement Department Attn: Geri A. Sams, Director of Procurement 535 Telfair Street, Room 605 Augusta, GA 30901 Fax: 706-821-2811 or Email: procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle December 8, 15, 22, 29, 2016 Metro Courier December 14, 2016 OFFICIAL Vendors Trane Commercial Systems 3342 Commerce Dr Augusta, GA 30909 GoldMech 1559 Broad St Augusta, GA 30901 Carolina Chillers 3810 Ladson Rd., Suite A Ladson, SC 29456 EMCOR Services 5901-G Northwoods Business Pkwy Charlotte, NC 28269 Attachment B YES YES YES YES E-Verify Number 20591 181543 341474 52626 SAVE Form YES YES YES YES Addendum 1 YES YES YES YES 1 Original YES YES YES YES 5 Copies YES YES YES YES Bid Price $127,234.00 $161,290.00 $143,529.41 $61,400.00 Total Number Specifications Mailed Out: 21 Total Number Specifications Download (Demandstar): 6 Total Electronic Notifications (Demandstar): 199 Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference: 6 Total packages submitted: 4 Total Noncompliant: 0 Bid Item #17-136 HVAC Automation System Upgrade for Diamond Lake Community Center Building for Augusta, Georgia - Recreation and Parks Department Bid Date: Thursday, January 19, 2017 @ 11:00 a.m. The following Vendors did not submit a bid: Contract Management and Southeast Automated Systems Page 1 of 1 Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 2017 - Fire Investigator Department:Central Services Department-Fleet Management Division Department:Central Services Department-Fleet Management Division Caption:Motion to approve a request from the Augusta Fire Chief for the acquisition of one Ford F-150 for an additional Arson Investigator. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background: The Augusta Fire Department has been authorized one additional Arson Investigator position and is requesting a Ford F-150 to support this position. Analysis:The Procurement Department published a competitive bid using the Demand Star application for the 6,000 GVW pickup trucks with the following results: Bid 16-235 - F150 V6 4x2 model: Allan Vigil Ford = $21,076.00 each; Fairway Ford = $20,906.00 each; Langsdale Chevrolet = $20,909.00 each; Master Buick GMC = $26,630.00 each. Financial Impact:1-F-150 truck at 20,906.00 using Phase VI Sales Tax. Alternatives:(1) Approve the request; (2) Do not approve the request Recommendation:Approve the purchase of one F-150 Pickup Truck, from Fairway Ford, using Phase VI funds, for the new Arson Investigator position. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: SPLOST VI-Fire Department REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:Cover Memo Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Invitation to Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until Friday, September 23, 2016 @ 11:00 a.m. for furnishing: Bid Item #16-235 6,000 GVW Series Pickup Truck – Augusta Central Services Department – Fleet Management Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams, Director Augusta Procurement Department 535 Telfair Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 Bid documents may be viewed on the Augusta, Georgia web site under the Procurement Department ARCbid. Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 535 Telfair Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. All questions must be submitted in writing by fax to 706 821-2811 or by email to procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov to the office of the Procurement Department by Friday, September 9, 2016 @ 5:00 P.M. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days after bids have been opened, pending the execution of contract with the successful bidder. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference an eligible bidder must submit a completed and signed written application to become a local bidder at least thirty (30) days prior to the date bids are received on an eligible local project. An eligible bidder who fails to submit an application for approval as a local bidder at least thirty (30) days prior to the date bids are received on an eligible local project, and who otherwise meets the requirements for approval as a local bidder, will not be qualified for a bid preference on such eligible local project. Invitation for bids and specifications. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. All requests to waive or modify any such material condition shall be submitted through the Procurement Director to the appropriate committee of the Augusta, Georgia Commission for approval by the Augusta, Georgia Commission. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that acquisition of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Correspondence must be submitted via mail, fax or email as follows: Augusta Procurement Department Attn: Geri A. Sams, Director of Procurement 535 Telfair Street, Room 605 Augusta, GA 30901 Fax: 706-821-2811 or Email: procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle August 18, 25, September 1, 8, 2016 Metro Courier August 24, 2016 OFFICIAL Vendors ALLAN VIGIL FORD 6790 MT. ZION BLVD MORROW, GA 30260 FAIRWAY FORD OF AUGUSTA 4333 WASHINGTON RD EVANS, GA 30809 LANGDALE CHEVOLET P. O. BOX 770 SYLVESTER, GA 31791 MASTER BUICK GMC 3710 WASHINGTON RD AUGUSTA, GA 30907 Attachment B Yes YES Yes Yes E-Verify Number 94460 689687 523776 KROS8437/ 665555 SAVE Form Yes YES Yes Yes 5.01 Fullsize Truck, Rg Cab 2 wheel drive $19,566.00 $19,770.00 $19,705.00 $25,100.00 5.02 Fullsize Truck, Rg Cab 4 wheel drive $20,898.00 $22,470.00 $22,626.00 $28,776.00 5.03 Fullsize Truck, Ext Cab 2 wheel drive $20,698.00 $20,839.00 $22,328.00 $27,784.00 5.04 Fullsize Truck, Ext Cab 4 wheel drive $23,584.00 $23,862.00 $25,486.00 $31,466.00 5.05 Fullsize Truck, Ext Cab 2 wheel drive, 8 cyl $21,884.00 $22,070.00 $23,380.00 $28,836.00 5.06 Fullsize Truck, Ext Cab 4 wheels door, 8 cyl $24,891.00 $25,094.00 $26,538.00 $32,518.00 5.07 Fullsize Truck, Crew Cab 2 wheel drive $23,997.00 $25,038.00 CC15743/ No Bid $33,228.00 5.08 Fullsize Truck, Crew Cab 4 wheel drive $27,094.00 $27,335.00 $29,078.00 $36,142.00 5.09 Speed control/tilt steering $215.00 $207.00 Standard n/a 5.10 Skid Plate package (4x4)$150.00 $148.00 $106.00 $295.00 Bid #16-235 6,000 GVW Series Pickup Truck for Augusta, Georgia - Central Services Department- Fleet Management Division Bid Opening Date: Friday, September 23, 2016 @ 11:00 a.m. Total Number Specifications Mailed Out: 20 Total Number Specifications Download (Demandstar): 1 Total Electronic Notifications (Demandstar): 95 Mandatory Pre-Bid/Telephone Conference: NOT APPLICABLE Total packages submitted: 4 Total Noncompliant: 0 5.00 Vehicle and Options Required Page 1 of 3 OFFICIAL Vendors ALLAN VIGIL FORD 6790 MT. ZION BLVD MORROW, GA 30260 FAIRWAY FORD OF AUGUSTA 4333 WASHINGTON RD EVANS, GA 30809 LANGDALE CHEVOLET P. O. BOX 770 SYLVESTER, GA 31791 MASTER BUICK GMC 3710 WASHINGTON RD AUGUSTA, GA 30907 Bid #16-235 6,000 GVW Series Pickup Truck for Augusta, Georgia - Central Services Department- Fleet Management Division Bid Opening Date: Friday, September 23, 2016 @ 11:00 a.m. Total Number Specifications Mailed Out: 20 Total Number Specifications Download (Demandstar): 1 Total Electronic Notifications (Demandstar): 95 Mandatory Pre-Bid/Telephone Conference: NOT APPLICABLE Total packages submitted: 4 Total Noncompliant: 0 5.11 Minimum 8 Foot Bed $300.00/ $950.00 $265.00 $614.00 $300.00 5.12 Black platform Run Bd $235.00 $231.00 $534.00 $780.00 5.13 Elec Windows & Door Locks $1,235.00 $893.00/ $1077.00 $640.00 $700.00 5.14 Trailer Tow package $460.00 $548.00 $380.00 $375.00 5.15 CNG Package $290.00 $1,758.00 n/a n/a 5.16 Heavy duty payload package $1,400.00 $3,304.00 Standard n/a 5.17 XL Chrome appearance package $300.00 $713.00 $220.00 $510.00 5.18 XL power equipment package $1,235.00 $893.00/ $1077.00 n/a n/a 5.19 XL sport appearance package $300.00 n/a n/a n/a 6.01 Fire Extinguisher $65.00 $50.00 $82.00 n/a 6.02 Outlet receptacle $70.00 $60.00 $189.00 n/a 6.03 Bedliner $355.00 $375.00 $453.00/ $529.00 $575.00 6.04 Toolbox $450.00 $259.00 $467.00 $500.00 6.05 Trailer hitch $505.00 $144.00 $405.00 $380.00 6.06 Trailer wiring included included $51.00 $150.00 6.07 Trailer Ball $40.00 $12.00 $30.00 $50.00 6.08 Window tint, reg cab $125.00 $125.00 $158.00 $150.00 6.00 Outfitter's Specialty Items Page 2 of 3 OFFICIAL Vendors ALLAN VIGIL FORD 6790 MT. ZION BLVD MORROW, GA 30260 FAIRWAY FORD OF AUGUSTA 4333 WASHINGTON RD EVANS, GA 30809 LANGDALE CHEVOLET P. O. BOX 770 SYLVESTER, GA 31791 MASTER BUICK GMC 3710 WASHINGTON RD AUGUSTA, GA 30907 Bid #16-235 6,000 GVW Series Pickup Truck for Augusta, Georgia - Central Services Department- Fleet Management Division Bid Opening Date: Friday, September 23, 2016 @ 11:00 a.m. Total Number Specifications Mailed Out: 20 Total Number Specifications Download (Demandstar): 1 Total Electronic Notifications (Demandstar): 95 Mandatory Pre-Bid/Telephone Conference: NOT APPLICABLE Total packages submitted: 4 Total Noncompliant: 0 6.09 Window tint, ext cab $150.00 $150.00 $200.00 $200.00 6.10 Window tint, crew cab $160.00 $175.00 $220.00 $200.00 6.11 Add on step-driver and passenger side drs $250.00 $159.00 $246.00 no bid 7.01 Backup alarm $115.00 $75.00 $71.00 $175.00 7.02 LED topmount light $555.00 $542.00 $504.00 n/a Year 2017 2017 2017 2017 Make Ford Ford Chevrolet GMC Model F150 F150 Silverado Sierra Approximate Delivery Date 10-12 weeks 90-120 days 60-70 days 8-12 weeks The following vendor did not respond: GERALD JONES FORD / 3480 WRIGHTSBORO RD / AUGUSTA, GA 30919 7.00 Alert Warning Systems 2017 6,000 GVW PICKUP TRUCK: Page 3 of 3 / fi/ellffAf Dtlfu T*iyardA.DoroqDfi+utoeA Bps.C.""&BrFl"cgMurgcr Cenual $errric€s DeP a;rtment AWtsF:Gh e0901 Phrac (70Q84L8892 To; *t Ms. Gerri Sm*, frscurenent lHrecto+ Sublectt Date: &omr Son CruvdOui FI*et fvlsurgnr, Ctilrirl Bgviees Dopnrfmqlt T.hrougb:,fr *iv^h A. Dous€, Ilirsctor, Ceirtrrl sewises Doprrlmont Fteet Maryg@eet rrrould like to pquct the bid av*arrd fq thc aftasH cpmp ,ilatisn of bid 16 ial, f;OO0gVW,SeriFsPtoEugTruc4, rrihiahqpeu€at on $eptambot{3t{ at 11ro0P,n .be qsmdedto F*inn1iy Fo-rd of,E'rensoGeorgia fib vendsr $'Ehitrdthclouaw,bid-urhich satisfaprorily Eet all of tt* depaifinartrs rnqrdremrnts. \08 have UEchetl,the rcmtts for'ytur revio-w. Plense letus knowuftrentbe vendorpapei:urctk isoomplaeitou thisa\Yadsothat we ruy &o,ve forward,wjth *re pn&ase procoss. rfyou hrye aoy'quertibus 6t gopq$ns p-loase crlr,Etact mg' EestPenolt$l Rcgards" fr/r-*&t Ron Croruden Flset Maeaser Biil Award n.ques{-Bid 16.135 fohrrary2lr20lZ 2017 6,000 PICKUP TRUCK BtD 16-235 Year Brand Model Delivery Date 5.01 Model -6,000-RC-4x2 l3.7Ll 5.12 Black Platform Run Boards 5.13 Elect Windows & Door Locks 6.OO OUTFITTER'S SPECIALTY ITEMS 6.07 2" Trailer Ball Sheet 7 19, 235.00 231.00 534.00 780.0c r.z3b.uu 893.00 640.00 700.0c 40.0u 12.O0 3U.UU| CU.UL oz r,u/o.uL szu,guu.ut $20,909.UU trz6,r'3U.UL Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 2017 - Request by First United Pentecostal Church Department:Central Services Department - Fleet Management Division Department:Central Services Department - Fleet Management Division Caption:Motion to deny a request from the Senior Pastor of First United Pentecostal Church of Augusta, Reverend Mark Maddox, for the donation of two paratransit vehicles and one bus for the First United Pentecostal Church of Augusta.(Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Mr. Patrick Stephens, Director of Augusta Transit, received a letter from Reverend Mark Maddox, of the First United Pentecostal Church requesting the donation 2-paratransit vans and one bus (see attached letter). This church is located at 1929 Fenwick Street, Augusta, GA. Analysis:The Director of Augusta Transit Department has indicated that he will be putting 3 running paratransit vans and 2 running buses in surplus in February 2017. There are two additional buses, not running, to be sold on auction. Financial Impact:Potential loss of revenue approximately $3,000 for all vehicles requested Alternatives:(1) Support the request, (2) deny the request, (3) approve the request in part. Recommendation:Commission consideration. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: None Required. REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:Cover Memo Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Central Services Departm ent Takiyah A. Douse, Director Fleet M anagement Ron Crowden, Fleet M anager 1568-C Broad Street Augusta GA 30904 Phone: (706) 821-2892 DATE: 7 February, 2017 TO: Mr. Chester Brazzell, Deputy Administrator THROUGH: Takiyah A. Douse, Director, Central Services Department FROM: Ron Crowden, Fleet Manger, Central Services Department SUBJECT: Request for Donation of Transit Vehicles CAPTION: The Senior Pastor of First United Pentecostal Church of Augusta, Reverend Mark Maddox, is requesting the donation of 2-paratransit vehicles and one bus for the First United Pentecostal Church of Augusta. BACKGROUND: Mr. Patrick Stephens, Director of Augusta Transit, received a letter from Reverend Mark Maddox, of the First United Pentecostal Church requesting the donation 2-paratransit vans and one bus (see attached letter). This church is located at 1929 Fenwick Street, Augusta, GA. ANALYSIS: The Director of Augusta Transit Department has indicated that he will be putting 3 running paratransit vans and 2 running buses in surplus in February 2017. There are two additional buses, not running, to be sold on auction. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Potential loss of revenue approximately $3,000 for all vehicles requested. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Support the request, (2) deny the request, (3) approve the request in part. RECOMMENDATION: Forwarded without recommendation. Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 2017 - Sheriff's Vehicles - SPLOST VII Department:Central Services Department - Fleet Management Division Department:Central Services Department - Fleet Management Division Caption:Motion to approve a request from the Richmond County Sheriff’s Office to replace 34 Road Patrol cars, 2 Traffic cars and 7 Criminal Investigation cars using SPLOST VII – Public Safety Vehicles. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:SPLOST VII’s allocation for Public Safety Vehicles is $1,500,000. For the purpose of SPLOST VII that includes the Richmond County Sheriff’s Office, Marshal’s Office, District Attorneys’ Office, Coroner’s Office, Probation Office, Solicitor’s Office, Augusta-Richmond County Correctional Institute, and Animal Services. Of the $1,500,000 the Sheriff’s Office is allocated $1,200,000. The Sheriff is requesting to replace 34-Road Patrol (pursuit) vehicles, 2- Traffic Division Vehicles and 7- Vehicles from CID. A list of vehicles and mileages and cost tab sheets are attached. Analysis:The Procurement Department published a competitive bid using the Demand Star national electronic bid application for Police Vehicles with the following results. Bid 16-257 – Patrol Package: Akins Ford Corp = $28,845.00; Thomson Chrysler = $28,968.00. Traffic Package: Akins Ford Corp = $29,470.00, Thomson Chrysler = $29,593.00. State Contract: CID Impalas – Hardy Chevrolet = $23,064.00 Financial Impact:34-Road Patrol vehicles at $28,845 each = $980,730.00; 2-Traffic Vehicles at $29,470 each = $58,940.00 and 7-Invetigator vehicles (Impalas) at $23,064.00 each = $161,448. The total amount for the Sheriff’s vehicles for 2017 SPLOST VII is $1,201,118.00. Alternatives:(1) Approve the request; (2) Do not approve the request Cover Memo Recommendation:Approve the request to replace 43 Sheriff’s vehicles at a cost of $1,201,118 from SPLOST VII – Public Safety Vehicles and declare the turned in vehicles surplus and available for surplus. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: SPLOST VII - Public Safety Vehicles REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Asset #Year Make Model Miles 203100 2003 Ford Crown Victoria 155,215 204183 2004 Ford Crown Victoria 156,950 205090 2005 Ford Crown Victoria 156,429 205095 2005 Ford Crown Victoria 216,967 205105 2005 Ford Crown Victoria 147,306 205168 2005 Ford Crown Victoria 168,373 205112 2005 Ford Crown Victoria 149,309 206069 2006 Ford Crown Victoria 162,366 206081 2006 Ford Crown Victoria 174,310 206082 2006 Ford Crown Victoria 155,003 206083 2006 Ford Crown Victoria 147,788 206085 2006 Ford Crown Victoria 199,799 206086 2006 Ford Crown Victoria 153,557 207005 2006 Ford Crown Victoria 179,443 207013 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 192,187 207017 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 190,030 207019 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 186,884 207022 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 138,479 207023 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 157,639 207026 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 143,875 207034 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 195,998 207037 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 157,276 207041 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 148,904 208054 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 161,213 208056 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 150,203 208059 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 178,421 208061 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 155,531 208062 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 159,656 208067 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 165,458 208072 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 168,788 209056 2009 Ford Crown Victoria 181,091 209067 2009 Ford Crown Victoria 189,094 209076 2009 Ford Crown Victoria 154,871 209077 2009 Ford Crown Victoria 166,624 Asset #Year Make Model Miles 206199 2006 Chevy Impala 190,353 206200 2007 Chevy Impala 149,452 206202 2007 Chevy Impala 146,244 206209 2007 Chevy Impala 139,171 206211 2007 Chevy Impala 148,576 206211 2007 Chevy Impala 148,576 206211 2007 Chevy Impala 143,576 RCSO-CID Sheriff - Road Patrol Cost 50.00$ 150.00$ 1,637.00$ Standard Equipment: V-6/ 6 speed Automatic Trans 2017 Chevrolet Impala Akins Ford Corp State Contract Delivery Time 12-14 Weeks $23,064.00 State Contract # 99999-SPD-ES40199373 Carpet with mats A/C AM/FM/CD player Power windows Power door locks Power Mirrors Power drivers seat Cloth bucket seats Cloth rear seat Tilt Steering wheel Cruise control Remote keyless entry Optional Items Extra Key & FOB Delivery Emergency equipment included in price Central Seruices Department A Ron Crowden, Fleet Managcr MEMORANDUM $g Geri Sams, Procurement Directord fraktyahA. Douse, Director, Central Services Department Ron Crowden, Fleet Manager, Central Services Department Partial Bid Award Request-Bid 16-257 December 8,2016 Iileet Management 1568-C Broad Street Augusta GA 30904 Phone: fl06) 821,-2892 To: Through: From: Subject: Date: Fleet Management would like to request the following portion of bid 16-257, Dodge Charger Police Automobile, which opened on December 2ndat 11:00 pm, be awarded to Akins Ford corporation of Winder, Georgia. The vendor was the low bidder on these items and met all required specifi cations: Sec 2 Item 6.03 - Marshal Package @$26,570.00 Sec 2 Item 6.04 - Patrol Package @ $28,845.00 Sec 2 Item 6.05 - Traffic Package @$29470.00 Please see attachment. Please let us know when the vendor paperwork is completed on this award so that we may move forward with the purchase process. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me. Best Personal Regards, &#*"* Fleet Manager 2017 DODGE CHARGER POLICE AUTOMOBILES BtD 16-257 Delivery Date 6.03 Marshal Package 6.04 Patrol Package 6.05 Traffic Package Akins Ford ,,.= 1/r$26.6[.0.0d $26,684.00u::t"l,-. S*8.il4fiilO $28,968.00 ..52&.4791:0.!$29.593.00 Invitation to Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until Friday, December 2, 2016 @ 11:00 a.m. for furnishing: Bid Item #16-257 2017 Dodge Charger Police Automobile – Central Services Department – Fleet Maintenance Division Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams, Director Augusta Procurement Department 535 Telfair Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 Bid documents may be viewed on the Augusta, Georgia web site under the Procurement Department ARCbid. Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 535 Telfair Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. All questions must be submitted in writing by fax to 706 821-2811 or by email to procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov to the office of the Procurement Department by Friday, November 18, 2016 @ 5:00 P.M. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days after bids have been opened, pending the execution of contract with the successful bidder. Invitation for bids and specifications. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. All requests to waive or modify any such material condition shall be submitted through the Procurement Director to the appropriate committee of the Augusta, Georgia Commission for approval by the Augusta, Georgia Commission. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that acquisition of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Correspondence must be submitted via mail, fax or email as follows: Augusta Procurement Department Attn: Geri A. Sams, Director of Procurement 535 Telfair Street, Room 605 Augusta, GA 30901 Fax: 706-821-2811 or Email: procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle October 27, November 3, 10, 17, 2016 Metro Courier November 2, 2016 OFFICIAL Vendors AKINS FORD CORP 220 WEST MAY STREET WINDER, GA 30680 THOMSON MOTOR CENTRE 2158 WASHINGTON ROAD NE THOMSON, GA 30824 Attachment B Yes Yes E-Verify #388164 369935 SAVE Form Yes Yes 6.01 Administrative package $23,415.00 $23,397.00 6.02 Civil package $24,597.00 $24,476.00 6.03 Marshal package $26,570.00 $26,684.00 6.04 Patrol package $28,845.00 $28,968.00 6.05 Traffic package $29,470.00 $29,593.00 7.01 HEMI 5.7 Liter engine $918.00 $1,985.00 7.02 All-wheel drive $918.00 + $1340.00 MINIMUM $4,447.00 7.03 Special exterior paint colors each $445.00 $445.00 7.04 Police Charger “Convenience Group”$427.00 $427.00 7.05 Park Assist Group $312.00 $312.00 8.01 1 each Whelen model SX8BBBB thin line LED light bar $1,785.00 $1,785.00 8.02 1 each Jotto Desk 425-6175 $395.00 $395.00 8.03 1 each Jotto Desk 425-6260 armrest $67.00 $67.00 Total Number Specifications Mailed Out: 7 Total Number Specifications Download (Demandstar): 7 Total Electronic Notifications (Demandstar): 125 Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference/Telephone Conference Attendees: NOT APPLICABLE Total packages submitted: 2 Total Noncompliant: 0 6.00 VEHICLE/OPTIONS REQUIRED Bid Item #16-257 Dodge Charger Police Automobile for Augusta, Georgia - Central Services Department- Fleet Management Division Bid Due: Friday, December 2, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. 7.00 OPTIONAL ITEMS: 8.00 OUTFITTER’S SPECIALTY ITEMS: Page 1 of 2 OFFICIAL Vendors AKINS FORD CORP 220 WEST MAY STREET WINDER, GA 30680 THOMSON MOTOR CENTRE 2158 WASHINGTON ROAD NE THOMSON, GA 30824 8.04 1 each Jotto Desk 425-3704 cup holder $60.00 $60.00 8.05 1 each Havis Shields $410.00 $410.00 8.06 1 each Sho-Me model 05.6000 six control switch power $120.00 $120.00 8.07 1 each Outlet receptacle $57.00 $57.00 8.08 2 each Talon rocker switches $10.00 $10.00 8.09 Jumper cable connection $210.00 $210.00 8.10 Corner Lighting $540.00 $540.00 8.11 1 each Whelen model SLPMMBB Blue/Blue dual LED flasher light $210.00 $210.00 8.12 1 each Whelen model SLPMMBA dual LED flasher light $210.00 $210.00 8.13 1 each Whelen model Alpha $190.00 $190.00 8.14 1 each Whelen model $165.00 $165.00 8.15 1 each Setina #10S-C $585.00 $585.00 8.16 1 each full lower extension plate with toe kick $70.00 $70.00 8.17 Rear door panels $160.00 $160.00 8.18 Rear side window barriers $200.00 $200.00 8.19 Rear seat $390.00 $390.00 8.20 Floor Pan $165.00 $165.00 8.21 Shotgun mount and lock $345.00 $345.00 8.22 Shotgun mount $95.00 $95.00 8.23 Push bumper $410.00 $410.00 8.24 Headlight guard $410.00 $410.00 8.25 # 35 window tint film application $125.00 $125.00 8.26 Fire extinguisher $50.00 $50.00 APPROXIMATE DELIVERY SCHEDULE: 12-14 wks 8-12 wks The followng venodr did not respond: BUTLER CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP / 1555 SALEM ROAD / BEAUFORT, SC 29902 2017 DODGE CHARGER POLICE AUTOMOBILE: Page 2 of 2 Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 2017 Annual Bid Items Department:Procurement Department:Procurement Caption:Motion to approve five (5) annual bid items. The items require Commission approval due to the fact that purchases on the individual items will exceed $25,000.00. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The following items require Commission approval: 17-016 Various Sizes of Rock – Environmental Svcs. Dept. – Vendors to be Awarded: Martin Marietta Augusta Quarry and Martin Marietta Appling Quarry – Estimated dollars to be spent: $50,000.00; 17- 027 - Rock Hauling Services – Environmental Svcs Dept. - Vendor to be Awarded: Jeffery Harris Construction - Estimated dollars to be spent: $50,000.00; 17-063 Athletic Clothing & Equipment – Recreation & Parks Department – Vendors to be Awarded: Johannsen Sporting Goods (local vendor), Riddell/All American, BSN Sports Passon’s Sports & US Games, S & S Worldwide; 17-113 Vacant Lot Cleaning Services – Environmental Svcs. Dept. – Vendor to be Awarded: Augusta Quality Lawn Care - Estimated dollars to be spent: $200,000.00; 17-129 Landscape Maintenance Services – Environmental Svcs. Dept. – Vendor to be Awarded: Jacob Land Management – Estimated dollars to be spent: $40,000.00. Analysis:Each item was bid through the sealed bid process as directed in the Augusta Procurement Code. The user departments reviewed the submittals and presented a recommendation of award to the Procurement Department. Financial Impact:Each department will be responsible for the purchase of the items listed on their bid. Alternatives:Not to award and required the department to follow the purchasing guidelines as llisted in the Augusta Procurement Code for each individual purchase.Cover Memo Recommendation:Approve the recommendations as submitted by each user department. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 2017- Boxing Club Donation Department:Central Services Department - Fleet Management Department Department:Central Services Department - Fleet Management Department Caption:Motion to approve a request from the Head Coach & Director of the Augusta Boxing Club for a donation of one 28-passenger bus in order to transport members of the Augusta Boxing Club to and from competitions. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The Augusta Boxing Club Director, Mr. Rayonta Whitfield, has requested the donation of two vehicles of the Augusta Transit Department to support the transportation needs of the Club (see attachment). The Transit Department has indicated they intend to surplus 3 running paratransit vehicles and 2 running APT buses and 2 that are not running. The request is for one bus and one 9- passenger van. Fleet Management does not have a van to support this request. It could support it with a paratransit van, given the Augusta Commission approves the request. The Augusta Commission has supported the Boxing Club in the past by authorizing the donation of one 15-passenger van. It is customary to pay one dollar per vehicle. If the Commission approves the request the Boxing Club would assume all liability and responsibility for the operation, maintenance, proper licensing of drivers and appropriate insurance of the vehicles. Analysis:If Augusta were to auction the bus and paratransit bus we could expect a bid of approximately $1,000 to $1,500 for each vehicle depending on the mileage of each. This estimate is derived from like type vehicles on the GovDeals website Financial Impact:Potential loss of revenue. Alternatives:1) Support the request with one bus and one paratransit van, (2) deny the request, (3) approve the request in part. Cover Memo Recommendation:Commission consideration. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: None Required REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo --*> i-/r*crc 17. Motion to approve the refund of the property texes to the Augusta Boxing Club and direct the Club to contect the Recreation Ilepartment to initinte the request about the assistance with the 15 passenger yan. (Approved by Finrnce Committee May 10,2010 ENGINEERING SERVICES 18. Motion to approve the execution of the three Consent Agreements with Inland Service Corporation due to a change in corporate control which requires Augusta's prior written consent. (Approved by Engineering Serices Committee Mey 10,2015) 19. Motion to authorize condemnntion to acquire title of e portion of property for right-of- way (Parcel 061-2-126-00-0) 519 Fairhope Street (Approved by Engineering Senices Committee May 10,2016) 20. Motion to authorize condemnation to ecquire title of a portion of property for right-of- way @arcel 061-l-155{04) 512 Mecon Avenue. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee May 10,2016) 21. Motion to authorize condemnetion to ecquire title of a portion of property for right-of- way (Parcel 051-l-159{0-0) 604 Macon Avenue. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee May 10,2010 22. Motion to authorize condemnation to ecquire title of a portion of property for right-of- wey (Percel 051-l-169{0-0) 713 Albrny Avenue. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee Mey 10,20f6) 23. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire title of a portion of property for right-of- way (Percel 061-1-308-00{) 04 Wellace Street. (Approved by Engineering Seruices Committee Mey 10,2016) PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 24. Motion to approve the minutes of the regulrr meeting of the Commission held May 4, 2016 and Special Called Meeting held May 10,2016. Mr. D. Williams out. Motion Pesses 9-0. [Items l-7,9-l4rlil24l The Clerk: Do you want to do the pulled items? Mr. Mayor: Let's go here fust. The Clerk: Let's go to the addendum, okay. The Clerk: ADDENDUM 26. Request the Augusta Commission accept the grent from the Georgia Department of Transportation for the Airport ARtrT' Pevement Rehebilitntion Proiect. This item wss presented to the Augusta Avietion Commission on Tuesday, May 10,2016. The Clerk: I do believe Chairman Cedric Johnson is here to provide information regarding that availability. Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 2017- Public Safety Vehicles-Marshal/Probation Department:Central Services Department - Fleet Management Division Department:Central Services Department - Fleet Management Division Caption:Motion to approve a request from Fleet Management for the replacement of four Marshal’s Office vehicles, purchase one new vehicle and to replace one vehicle in the Probation Office using SPLOST Phase VII – Public Safety Vehicles. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Each year Fleet Management assess vehicles of the Public Safety Offices to determine recommendations for replacement. The Marshal’s Office has 4 older model vehicles that meet the replacement criteria as follows: Asset 207067- 2007 Ford Crown Victoria with 148,899 miles, 207071 – 2007 Ford Crown Victoria with 153,934 miles, 210071 – 2010 Ford Crown Victoria with 157,152 miles and 210072 – 2010 Ford Crown Victoria with 141,036 miles. The Marshal has requested one additional car to support the Administration Division. The Probation Office was instituted in 2016. To support this requirement Fleet Management used a 2005 Ford Crown Victoria turned in by the Sheriff’s Office. This car, 205093- 2005 Crown Victoria has 176,244 miles on it and an extensive repair record. Analysis:The Procurement Department published a competitive bid using the Demand Star application for the Dodge Charger Bid Number 16-257. Bid 16-257 – Dodge Charger : Akins Ford Corp = $26,570.00 each (patrol type); Thomson Chrysler = $26,684.00 Bid 16-257 – Dodge Charger : Akins Ford Corp = $24,760.00 each (administrative package); Thomson Chrysler - $25,809.00. Note: cost difference is due to difference in emergency equipment to be installed Financial Impact:Five Dodge Chargers at $26,570 for a total of $132,850.00 and one Dodge Charger at $24,760.00. The total cost of the 6 vehicles is $157,610.00. Funds for these vehicles will come from SPLOST Phase VII – Public Safety Vehicles Cover Memo Alternatives:(1) Approve the request; (2) Do not approve the request; (3) Approve the request in part. Recommendation:Approve the request to replace 4 vehicles of and one new vehicle for the Marshal’s Office and 1 replacement vehicle from the Probation Office. Approve declaring the replaced vehicles surplus and available for auction Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: SPLOST VII - Phase VII - Public Safety Vehicles REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo 2017 DODGE CHARGER POLICE VEHICLES SHERIFF-2017 DODGE POLICE AUTOMOBILE-BID OPENING 12/2/16 @ 11:00 BID 16-257 Akins Ford Thomson Corp Chrysler Delivery Date 8-10 Weeks 90-120 Days 6.01 Administrative Package $23,415.00 $23,397.00 7.00 OPTIONAL ITEMS 7.01 Hemi Engine 918.00 1,985.00 7.04 Charger Convenience Group 427.00 427.00 TOTAL $24,760.00 $25,809.00 Invitation to Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until Friday, December 2, 2016 @ 11:00 a.m. for furnishing: Bid Item #16-257 2017 Dodge Charger Police Automobile – Central Services Department – Fleet Maintenance Division Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams, Director Augusta Procurement Department 535 Telfair Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 Bid documents may be viewed on the Augusta, Georgia web site under the Procurement Department ARCbid. Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 535 Telfair Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. All questions must be submitted in writing by fax to 706 821-2811 or by email to procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov to the office of the Procurement Department by Friday, November 18, 2016 @ 5:00 P.M. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. No bids may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days after bids have been opened, pending the execution of contract with the successful bidder. Invitation for bids and specifications. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. All requests to waive or modify any such material condition shall be submitted through the Procurement Director to the appropriate committee of the Augusta, Georgia Commission for approval by the Augusta, Georgia Commission. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that acquisition of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Correspondence must be submitted via mail, fax or email as follows: Augusta Procurement Department Attn: Geri A. Sams, Director of Procurement 535 Telfair Street, Room 605 Augusta, GA 30901 Fax: 706-821-2811 or Email: procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle October 27, November 3, 10, 17, 2016 Metro Courier November 2, 2016 OFFICIAL Vendors AKINS FORD CORP 220 WEST MAY STREET WINDER, GA 30680 THOMSON MOTOR CENTRE 2158 WASHINGTON ROAD NE THOMSON, GA 30824 Attachment B Yes Yes E-Verify #388164 369935 SAVE Form Yes Yes 6.01 Administrative package $23,415.00 $23,397.00 6.02 Civil package $24,597.00 $24,476.00 6.03 Marshal package $26,570.00 $26,684.00 6.04 Patrol package $28,845.00 $28,968.00 6.05 Traffic package $29,470.00 $29,593.00 7.01 HEMI 5.7 Liter engine $918.00 $1,985.00 7.02 All-wheel drive $918.00 + $1340.00 MINIMUM $4,447.00 7.03 Special exterior paint colors each $445.00 $445.00 7.04 Police Charger “Convenience Group”$427.00 $427.00 7.05 Park Assist Group $312.00 $312.00 8.01 1 each Whelen model SX8BBBB thin line LED light bar $1,785.00 $1,785.00 8.02 1 each Jotto Desk 425-6175 $395.00 $395.00 8.03 1 each Jotto Desk 425-6260 armrest $67.00 $67.00 Total Number Specifications Mailed Out: 7 Total Number Specifications Download (Demandstar): 7 Total Electronic Notifications (Demandstar): 125 Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference/Telephone Conference Attendees: NOT APPLICABLE Total packages submitted: 2 Total Noncompliant: 0 6.00 VEHICLE/OPTIONS REQUIRED Bid Item #16-257 Dodge Charger Police Automobile for Augusta, Georgia - Central Services Department- Fleet Management Division Bid Due: Friday, December 2, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. 7.00 OPTIONAL ITEMS: 8.00 OUTFITTER’S SPECIALTY ITEMS: Page 1 of 2 OFFICIAL Vendors AKINS FORD CORP 220 WEST MAY STREET WINDER, GA 30680 THOMSON MOTOR CENTRE 2158 WASHINGTON ROAD NE THOMSON, GA 30824 8.04 1 each Jotto Desk 425-3704 cup holder $60.00 $60.00 8.05 1 each Havis Shields $410.00 $410.00 8.06 1 each Sho-Me model 05.6000 six control switch power $120.00 $120.00 8.07 1 each Outlet receptacle $57.00 $57.00 8.08 2 each Talon rocker switches $10.00 $10.00 8.09 Jumper cable connection $210.00 $210.00 8.10 Corner Lighting $540.00 $540.00 8.11 1 each Whelen model SLPMMBB Blue/Blue dual LED flasher light $210.00 $210.00 8.12 1 each Whelen model SLPMMBA dual LED flasher light $210.00 $210.00 8.13 1 each Whelen model Alpha $190.00 $190.00 8.14 1 each Whelen model $165.00 $165.00 8.15 1 each Setina #10S-C $585.00 $585.00 8.16 1 each full lower extension plate with toe kick $70.00 $70.00 8.17 Rear door panels $160.00 $160.00 8.18 Rear side window barriers $200.00 $200.00 8.19 Rear seat $390.00 $390.00 8.20 Floor Pan $165.00 $165.00 8.21 Shotgun mount and lock $345.00 $345.00 8.22 Shotgun mount $95.00 $95.00 8.23 Push bumper $410.00 $410.00 8.24 Headlight guard $410.00 $410.00 8.25 # 35 window tint film application $125.00 $125.00 8.26 Fire extinguisher $50.00 $50.00 APPROXIMATE DELIVERY SCHEDULE: 12-14 wks 8-12 wks The followng venodr did not respond: BUTLER CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP / 1555 SALEM ROAD / BEAUFORT, SC 29902 2017 DODGE CHARGER POLICE AUTOMOBILE: Page 2 of 2 Central Seruices Department A Ron Crowden, Fleet Managcr MEMORANDUM $g Geri Sams, Procurement Directord fraktyahA. Douse, Director, Central Services Department Ron Crowden, Fleet Manager, Central Services Department Partial Bid Award Request-Bid 16-257 December 8,2016 Iileet Management 1568-C Broad Street Augusta GA 30904 Phone: fl06) 821,-2892 To: Through: From: Subject: Date: Fleet Management would like to request the following portion of bid 16-257, Dodge Charger Police Automobile, which opened on December 2ndat 11:00 pm, be awarded to Akins Ford corporation of Winder, Georgia. The vendor was the low bidder on these items and met all required specifi cations: Sec 2 Item 6.03 - Marshal Package @$26,570.00 Sec 2 Item 6.04 - Patrol Package @ $28,845.00 Sec 2 Item 6.05 - Traffic Package @$29470.00 Please see attachment. Please let us know when the vendor paperwork is completed on this award so that we may move forward with the purchase process. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me. Best Personal Regards, &#*"* Fleet Manager 2017 DODGE CHARGER POLICE AUTOMOBILES BtD 16-257 Delivery Date 6.03 Marshal Package 6.04 Patrol Package 6.05 Traffic Package Akins Ford ,,.= 1/r$26.6[.0.0d $26,684.00u::t"l,-. S*8.il4fiilO $28,968.00 ..52&.4791:0.!$29.593.00 -t,,9,:s::,11.,?.*ic e s D ep aftment A R.n Crowden, Flcet Managcr ,#::Tffi5T,'ll Augusta GA 30904 Phone: (706) 821-2892 To: Through: From: Subject: Date: MEMORANDUM t@ Ceri Sams, Procurement Directortr,O Tal<tyah A. Douse, Director, Central Services Department Ron Crowden, Fleet Manager, Central Services Department Partial Bid Award Request-Bid 16-257 December 8,2016 Fleet Management would like to request the following portion of bid 16-257,Dodge Charger Police Automobile, which opened on December 2nd,at 11:00 pm, be awarded to ThomsonMotor Centre of Thomson, Georgia. The vendor was the low bidder on these items and met all required specifications: Sec 2 Item 6.01 - Administrative Package @$23,397.00 Sec 2 Item 6.02 - Civil Package @$24,476.00 Please see attachment. Please let us know when the vendor paperwork is completed on this award so that we may moveforward with the purchase process. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me. Best Personal Regards. :, , , . G/,*L Ron Crowden Fleet Manager 2017 DODGE CHARGER POLICE AUTOMOBILES BID 16-257 Delivery Date 6.01 Administrative package 6.02 Civilpackage Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Resolution of Support Operation Teammate Department: Department: Caption:Motion to approve Resolution of Support - Operation Teammate. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo AGEDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Commission/Committee: (Please check one) _______ Commission _______ Public Services Committee _______ Administrative Services Committee _______ Engineering Services Committee _______ Finance Committee _______ Public Safety Committee Contact Information for Individual/Presenter Making the Request: Name: _________________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________________ Fax Number: ____________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: _________________________________________________________ Caption/Topic of Discussion to be placed on the Agenda: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Please send this request form to the following address: Ms. Lena J. Bonner Telephone umber: 706-821-1820 Clerk of Commission Fax umber: 706-821-1838 Room 806 Municipal Building E-Mail Address: lbonner@augustaga.gov 530 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30911 Requests may be faxed, e-mailed or delivered in person and must be received in the Clerk’s Office no later than 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the Commission or Committee meeting of the following week. A five-minute time limit will be allowed for presentations. Commission meetings are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 2:00 p.m. Committee meetings are held on the second and last Mondays of each month from 12:30 to 3:30 p.m. Resolution of Support FOR THE PUBLIC SUPPORT FROM THE AUGUSTA, GEORGIA ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE WHILE OPERATION TEAMMATE COORDINATES AND EXECUTES CHILDREN’S FOCUSED EVENTS THROUGHOUT AUGUSTA, GEORGIA IN CALENDAR YEAR 2017. WHEREAS, Operation Teammate is applying to the Augusta, Georgia Administrative Services Committee to show public support to Operation Teammate while supporting the children of military and first responder parents during times of family separation; and WHEREAS, Operation Teammate works with college and professional athletic organizations to have these children become honorary teammates during the family separation; and WHEREAS, Operation Teammate events are open to all branches of the military (National Guard, Reserve, and active duty), Veterans, wounded warriors, and a variety of first responder professionals; and WHEREAS, the preferred target audience for an Operation Teammate event is those school age children (ages 5-18) that have a U.S. Military or First Responder parent(s) away from home on duty, resulting in an extreme family separation; and WHEREAS, the 2017 Operation Teammate goal is to conduct at least one event per calendar year quarter throughout the Augusta, Georgia area, which would involve a variety of college and professional athletic organizations; and WHEREAS, Operation Teammate events consist of approximately 15-20 participating children, averaging a $500.00 financial obligation to satisfy the requirements to properly execute each event; and WHEREAS, an individual Operation Teammate event financial obligation consist of promotion material, admission/food vouchers, gear (shirts) for the participating children/parent(s), sports personality speakers fee, and Operation Teammate point of contact travel; and WHEREAS, activity options during an Operation Teammate athletic event could possibly include, meet/greet with the athletes, sports personality speeches, arena tours, pre-game/half-time recognition, post game pictures/autographs, and memorabilia presentations; and WHEREAS, Operation Teammate events are bonding experiences for families and promote a positive lifestyle that have lead to open dialogue between our children and the deployed parent, directly resulting in success of our mission; and WHEREAS, attendee’s engagement with athletic personalities at/during events further solidifies an event’s success, and our program’s mission is supported by overwhelming positive testimonial feedback from attending families; and WHEREAS, a direct parental testimonial is “The kids are always excited when they attend an Operation Teammate event, interacting with the athletes really sets a fantastic example.” D. Corman, USAF parent – 2016; and WHEREAS, the Board and Commissioners of Augusta, Georgia are knowledgeable of and are in agreement with the proposed public support. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board and Commissioners of Augusta, Georgia does hereby: Support the submission of an application by Operation Teammate to the Augusta, Georgia Administrative Services Committee for the purpose of public support while Operation Teammate coordinates and executes children’s focused events throughout Augusta, Georgia in calendar year 2017. RESOLVED this 28th day of February, 2017. Augusta, Georgia Commission _________________________ Hardie Davis, Jr., Mayor c ro rHwtr ={lHoz ={Ftt H RB ={H RiaoKK,A\<z|}-( "+ {F< @r? F "{rfrr HK rfrrl> --{L+r-<l+t6 ,HH E i,Eo a.tr. Poa FD P otJrcoE tr l)|lo(+ 5,E 0D(+ P o(+ o oBoa soEtr.N 0D(+ FlooEa(+o {(D ()o 5o C)))io a-EoE oH) l-a))l .)- r+ 0DE 0DEa. lrlEa(+ Bo(a 15o PgoE 15 eD4o)(+O 0DV) l-r)oFoE soE o cD ==g =6s =EgEii EAe=.FO'5 Itloo,-iE = -XdEl:X ts€ 8 =or-oz 6-oorp.6, Hr$*A)OLo =dE(')-+rn=1i $.o J? Yo ooq6' o)f.o =C) oHN)(,1)ro! F- =oS{^e(aDlt eo Ea\oS..+ I N)ol.rUt N) a ooF €oo - -oxEoaC -loa -.+==o d 6dE alatC= =oq3o=(Dc +5ntn =' o)3EecLo) O+CtOJ-jj r+E3a(DOnt -o)€ X'=1Vlr, ltl3-qilq +'=)X ofi = o-o =(D-=p- 5=€ d8.* @ fvov J; .4) o-{o)' =x9uo-r@ =l.l N!P(O5(rl 00 e'g=\b ,-.oa 11 e.NilO=3 roi\l lO OtoIo=l- =.19dlo o)t:3ltrHolo * ='l= q OIJ 6+lq, o -. lFlfit8 =th 55eh'13t= *dl= sdlb s(4fo trral(D =:510 9alFJt-!-J,13d dIE il'l-(r)15N) I:I Yr- ld ii: >lF'ts oo lY crcUrj o.s;crq Xdq'OrJ Hfi E'c*Ea -O E.ElJOr F'(, o,u.+NO n @ Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Presentation of the Updated Hazard Mitigation Plan Department:EMA Department:EMA Caption:Motion to approve the Hazard Mitigation Plan Update provided by Atkins North America, Inc. and authorize the Mayor to execute the Updated Hazard Mitigation Plan following the 30-day public review period. (Approved by Public Safety Committee February 28, 2017) Background:A Contract, dated August 2, 2016, was awarded to Atkins North America, Inc., to prepare an updated Hazard Mitigation Plan, Project Number PDMC-PL-04-GA2015-001/HPD15-0018, for Augusta-Richmond County. State and local governments are required to develop and maintain a hazard mitigation plan as a condition of receiving certain types of hazard mitigation disaster assistance, emergency and non-emergency. Augusta, GA received grant funding from FEMA and GEMA to complete the plan update. Analysis:The Hazard Mitigation Plan forms the foundation for a community's long-term strategy to reduce disaster losses and break the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction and repeated damage. This plan creates a framework for risk-based decision making to reduce damages to lives, property, and the economy from future disasters. The requirements and procedures for state and local mitigation plans are found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at Title 44, Chapter 1, Part 201 (44 CFR Part 201). Financial Impact:Augusta, GA received grant funding from FEMA and GEMA to complete the plan update. Augusta, GA is responsible for a 15% match. This was previously approved on August 2, 2016. Alternatives:none Cover Memo Recommendation:Approve the Hazard Mitigation Plan Update and authorize the Mayor to execute the appropriate documents at the close of the 30- day public review period. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: No additional fund required. Plan developed through approved Contract. REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo City of Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Safety Committee Meeting February 28, 2017 AgendaAgenda • Project Overview – Overview of Hazard Mitigation – Purpose of the Plan – Key Objectives/Scope – Project Tasks – Plan Overview • Questions “mit-i-gate” 1: to cause to become less harsh or hostile. 2: to make less severe or painful. Hazard Mitigation Any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. What is Mitigation?What is Mitigation? Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 • Revitalized Federal Planning Requirements – State and Local Hazard Mitigation Plans • Federal Grant Funding Eligibility – Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) – Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (PDM) – Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) • DMA 2000 is intended to facilitate cooperation between state and local authorities on risk reduction measures and to expedite funding allocation Hazard Mitigation Techniques Hazard Mitigation Techniques • Prevention • Property Protection • Natural Resource Protection • Structural Projects • Emergency Services • Public Education and Awareness Purpose of the Plan and Update Purpose of the Plan and Update • Protect life, safety and property by reducing the potential for future damages and economic losses that result from hazards • Identify and qualify for grant funding in both the pre- disaster and post-disaster environment • Make the community a safer place to live, work and play • Speed recovery and redevelopment following future disaster events • Demonstrate a firm commitment to hazard mitigation principles • Comply with state and federal legislative requirements for hazard mitigation plans Key ObjectivesKey Objectives • Update the current HMP for Augusta-Richmond County • Join the Community Rating System Program • Maintain mitigation funding eligibility for Augusta-Richmond County • Potential projects identification – Funding sources/grant identification • Public awareness and education • State and Federal compliance Project TasksProject Tasks 1. Planning Process 2. Organize Resources 3. Identify Threats and Hazards 4. Risk Assessment 5. Develop a Mitigation Strategy 6. Plan Maintenance and Adoption Plan OverviewPlan Overview • Plan Components – Section 1: Introduction – Section 2: Planning Process – Section 3: University System Profile – Section 4: Hazard Identification – Section 5: Hazard Analysis – Section 6: Vulnerability Assessment Plan SectionsPlan Sections • Plan Components (continued) – Section 7: Mitigation Strategy – Section 8: Mitigation Action Plan – Section 9: Plan Maintenance Procedures – Appendix A: Plan Review Tool – Appendix B: Campus Assessments – Appendix C: Planning Process Documents Plan SectionsPlan Sections • Plan Sections (continued) – Appendix D: Public Participation Survey – Appendix E: Plan Adoption Planning ProcessPlanning Process • Reconvened Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) • Public participation and outreach to key stakeholders • Data collection and analysis • Plan preparation and submission Hazard IdentificationHazard Identification • Identified threats and hazards – Natural and man-made/technological hazards – Detailed profiles for all hazards • Hazard description • Historical occurrences • Known hazard boundaries – Priority Risk Index (PRI) HazardsHazards •Natural •Climate Adaptation •Drought •Earthquake •Extreme Heat •Flooding •Hail •Hurricane/Tropical Storm •Infectious Disease •Lightning •Severe Winter Storm •Solar EMP •Tornado •Windstorm •Wildfire •Technological •Chemical Hazard •Cyberterrorism •Dam and Levee Failure •Nuclear Plant Incident •Terrorism •Utility Failure Risk AssessmentRisk Assessment • Vulnerability Assessment – Asset inventory (exposure) – Loss estimates • Development Trends and Implications Conclusion on Hazard RiskConclusion on Hazard Risk HIGH RISK Flooding Chemical Hazard Drought Extreme Heat MODERATE RISK Tornado Windstorm/Thunderstorm Hurricane/Tropical Storm Hail Lightning Infectious Disease Wildfire Cyberterrorism Terrorism LOW RISK Nuclear Power Plant Incident Solar Flare/EMP Earthquake Utility Failure Dam and Levee Failure Mitigation StrategyMitigation Strategy • Updated Mitigation Goals – Based upon findings of the risk and capability assessments • Updated status of current actions and develop new actions based on the identification and analysis of mitigation measures – Prevention, property protection, natural resource protection, structural projects, emergency services, and public education and awareness Overview of ActionsOverview of Actions • Mitigation Action Techniques – Prevention - 14 actions – Property Protection - 1 actions – Natural Resource Protection - 0 actions – Emergency Services - 6 actions – Structural Projects - 1 action – Public Education and Awareness - 7 actions Plan MaintenancePlan Maintenance • Monitoring and reporting • Evaluating and updating • Implementation mechanisms • Continued public involvement QuestionsQuestions Contact: Margaret M. Walton Atkins, North America, Inc. Margaret.Walton@atkinsglobal.com 803.622.4142 Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................ SECTION 1 Planning Process ................................................................. SECTION 2 Community Profile .............................................................. SECTION 3 Hazard Identification .......................................................... SECTION 4 Hazard Profiles .................................................................... SECTION 5 Vulnerability Assessment .................................................... SECTION 6 Capability Assessment ........................................................ SECTION 7 Mitigation Strategy ............................................................. SECTION 8 Mitigation Action Plan ........................................................ SECTION 9 Plan Maintenance ............................................................. SECTION 10 Plan Adoption ...................................................................APPENDIX A Planning Tools .................................................................. APPENDIX B Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool .................................... APPENDIX C Planning Process Documentation .................................... APPENDIX D SSEECCTTIIOONN 11 INTRODUCTION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 1:1 This section provides a general introduction to the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan. It consists of the following five subsections: 1.1 Background 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Scope 1.4 Authority 1.5 Summary of Plan Contents 1.1 BACKGROUND Natural and man-made hazards, such as floods, hurricanes, and nuclear power plant incidents, are a part of the world around us. In some cases, their occurrence is natural and inevitable, and there is little we can do to control their force and intensity. In others, we have more power to control the intensity and probability, but can never truly eliminate the threat entirely. In either case, we must consider these hazards to be legitimate and significant threats to human life, safety, and property. Augusta-Richmond County is located in the east central section of Georgia. This area is vulnerable to a wide range of natural hazards, such as severe thunderstorms/windstorms, winter storms, floods, and hurricanes/tropical storms. It is also vulnerable to technological and man-made hazards, including chemical hazards, terrorism, and nuclear power plant incidents. These hazards threaten the life and safety of residents in Augusta-Richmond County and have the potential to damage or destroy both public and private property, disrupt the local economy, and impact the overall quality of life of individuals who live, work, and vacation in Augusta-Richmond County. While the threat from hazardous events may never be fully eliminated, there is much we can do to lessen their potential impact upon our community and our citizens. By minimizing the impact of hazards upon our built environment, we can prevent such events from resulting in disasters. The concept and practice of reducing risks to people and property from known hazards is generally referred to as hazard mitigation. FEMA Definition of Hazard Mitigation: “Any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards.” Hazard mitigation techniques include both structural measures (such as strengthening or protecting buildings and infrastructure from the destructive forces of potential hazards) and non-structural measures (such as the adoption of sound land use policies and the creation of public awareness programs). It is widely accepted that the most effective mitigation measures are implemented at the local government level, where decisions on the regulation and control of development are ultimately SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 1:2 made. A comprehensive mitigation approach addresses hazard vulnerabilities that exist today and in the foreseeable future. Therefore, it is essential that projected patterns of future development are evaluated and considered in terms of how that growth will increase or decrease a community’s overall hazard vulnerability. A key component in the formulation of a comprehensive approach to hazard mitigation is to develop, adopt, and update a local hazard mitigation plan as needed. A hazard mitigation plan establishes the broad community vision and guiding principles for reducing hazard risk, and further proposes specific mitigation actions to eliminate or reduce identified vulnerabilities. Augusta-Richmond County and the two municipalities participating in the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan have an existing hazard mitigation plan that has evolved over the years, as described in Section 2: Planning Process. This update of the plan draws from the previous plan to document the efforts of each jurisdiction to incorporate hazard mitigation principles and practices into routine government activities and functions. At its core, the Plan recommends specific actions to minimize hazard vulnerability and protect residents from losses to those hazards that pose the greatest risk. These mitigation actions go beyond simply recommending structural solutions to reduce existing vulnerability, such as elevation, retrofitting, and acquisition projects. Local policies on community growth and development, incentives for natural resource protection, and public awareness and outreach activities are examples of other actions considered to reduce Augusta-Richmond County’s vulnerability to identified hazards. The Plan remains a living document, with implementation and evaluation procedures established to help achieve meaningful objectives and successful outcomes over time. 1.1.1 The Disaster Mitigation Act and the Flood Insurance Reform Acts In an effort to reduce the Nation's mounting natural disaster losses, the U.S. Congress passed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) in order to amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. Section 322 of DMA 2000 emphasizes the need for state, local, and Tribal government entities to closely coordinate on mitigation planning activities and makes the development of a hazard mitigation plan a specific eligibility requirement for any local or Tribal government applying for federal mitigation grant funds. In short, if a jurisdiction is not covered by an approved mitigation plan, it will not be eligible for mitigation grant funds. These funds include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and the Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program, both of which are administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under the Department of Homeland Security. Communities with an adopted and federally-approved hazard mitigation plan thereby become pre- positioned and more apt to receive available mitigation funds before and after the next disaster strikes. Additionally, the Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-264) created two new grant programs, Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) and Repetitive Flood Claim (RFC), and modified the existing Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program. One of the requirements of this Act is that a FEMA-approved Hazard Mitigation Plan is now required if communities wish to be eligible for these FEMA mitigation programs. However, as of early 2014, these programs have been folded into a single Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program. This change was brought on by new, major federal flood insurance legislation that was passed in 2012 under the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act (P.L. 112-141) and the subsequent Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act in 2014 which revised Biggert-Waters. These acts made several SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 1:3 changes to the way the National Flood Insurance Program is to be run, including raises in rates to reflect true flood risk and changes in how Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) updates impact policyholders. These acts further emphasize Congress’ focus on mitigating vulnerable structures. The Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan has been prepared in coordination with FEMA Region IV and the Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA) to ensure that the Plan meets all applicable FEMA and state requirements for hazard mitigation plans. A Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool, found in Appendix C, provides a summary of federal and state minimum standards and notes the location where each requirement is met within the Plan. 1.2 PURPOSE The purpose of the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan is to: Reduce risk to people, property, and the critical infrastructure; Increase public awareness and education about the plan and the planning process; Maintain grant eligibility for participating jurisdictions; and Maintain compliance with state and federal legislative requirements for local hazard mitigation plans. 1.3 SCOPE The focus of the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan is on those hazards determined to be “high” or “moderate” risks to Augusta-Richmond County, as determined through a detailed hazard risk assessment. Other hazards that pose a “low” or “negligible” risk will continue to be evaluated during future updates to the Plan, but they may not be fully addressed until they are determined to be of high or moderate risk. This enables the participating jurisdictions to prioritize mitigation actions based on those hazards which are understood to present the greatest risk to lives and property. The geographic scope (i.e., the planning area) for the Plan includes all of Augusta-Richmond County including all of its incorporated municipalities (see below). Richmond County includes three municipalities: Augusta, Blythe, and Hephzibah. The City of Augusta operates in conjunction with Richmond County as part of a consolidated government and thus, these communities are treated as a single entity in this plan as there are no unincorporated areas within the county. Additionally, Fort Gordon occupies a large section of the southwest part of the county and, although not an incorporated municipality, it is treated as a separate entity for the purposes of this Plan. Table 1.1 indicates the participating jurisdictions. TABLE 1.1: JURISDICTIONAL AREAS IN THE AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Fort Gordon Blythe Hephzibah SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 1:4 1.4 AUTHORITY The Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan has been developed in accordance with current state and federal rules and regulations governing local hazard mitigation plans and has been adopted by each participating jurisdiction in accordance with standard local procedures. Copies of the adoption resolutions for each participating jurisdiction are provided in Appendix A. The Plan shall be routinely monitored and revised to maintain compliance with the following provisions, rules, and legislation: Section 322, Mitigation Planning, of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as enacted by Section 104 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-390); FEMA's Final Rule published in the Federal Register, at 44 CFR Part 201 (201.6 for local mitigation planning requirements and 201.7 for Tribal planning requirements); and Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-264), Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (P.L. 112-141) and the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act. 1.5 SUMMARY OF PLAN CONTENTS The contents of this Plan are designed and organized to be as reader-friendly and functional as possible. While significant background information is included on the processes used and studies completed (i.e., risk assessment, capability assessment), this information is separated from the more meaningful planning outcomes or actions (i.e., mitigation strategy, mitigation action plan). Section 2, Planning Process, provides a complete narrative description of the process used to prepare the Plan. This includes the identification of participants on the planning team and describes how the public and other stakeholders were involved. It also includes a detailed summary for each of the key meetings held, along with any associated outcomes. The Community Profile, located in Section 3, provides a general overview of Augusta-Richmond County, including prevalent geographic, demographic, and economic characteristics. In addition, building characteristics and land use patterns are discussed. This baseline information provides a snapshot of the planning area and helps local officials recognize those social, environmental, and economic factors that ultimately play a role in determining the county’s vulnerability to hazards. The Risk Assessment is presented in three sections: Section 4, Hazard Identification; Section 5, Hazard Profiles; and Section 6, Vulnerability Assessment. Together, these sections serve to identify, analyze, and assess hazards that pose a threat to Augusta-Richmond County. The risk assessment also attempts to define any hazard risks that may uniquely or exclusively affect specific areas of Augusta-Richmond County. The Risk Assessment begins by identifying hazards that threaten Augusta-Richmond County. Next, detailed profiles are established for each hazard, building on available historical data from past hazard occurrences, spatial extent, and probability of future occurrence. This section culminates in a hazard risk ranking based on conclusions regarding the frequency of occurrence, spatial extent, and potential impact highlighted in each of the hazard profiles. In the vulnerability assessment, FEMA’s Hazus®MH loss estimation methodology is used in conjunction with GIS analysis to evaluate known hazard risks by their relative long-term cost in expected damages. In essence, the information generated through the risk assessment serves a critical function as the participating jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County seek SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 1:5 to determine the most appropriate mitigation actions to pursue and implement—enabling them to prioritize and focus their efforts on those hazards of greatest concern and those structures or planning areas facing the greatest risk(s). The Capability Assessment, found in Section 7, provides a comprehensive examination of Augusta- Richmond County’s capacity to implement meaningful mitigation strategies and identifies opportunities to increase and enhance that capacity. Specific capabilities addressed in this section include planning and regulatory capability, staff and organizational (administrative) capability, technical capability, fiscal capability, and political capability. Information was obtained through the use of a detailed survey questionnaire and an inventory and analysis of existing plans, ordinances, and relevant documents. The purpose of this assessment is to identify any existing gaps, weaknesses, or conflicts in programs or activities that may hinder mitigation efforts and to identify those activities that should be built upon in establishing a successful and sustainable local hazard mitigation program. The Risk Assessment, and Capability Assessment collectively serve as a basis for determining the goals for the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan, each contributing to the development, adoption, and implementation of a meaningful and manageable Mitigation Strategy that is based on accurate background information. The Mitigation Strategy, found in Section 8, consists of broad goal statements as well as an analysis of hazard mitigation techniques for the jurisdictions participating in the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan to consider in reducing hazard vulnerabilities. The strategy provides the foundation for a detailed Mitigation Action Plan, found in Section 9, which links specific mitigation actions for each jurisdiction to locally-assigned implementation mechanisms and target completion dates. Together, these sections are designed to make the Plan both strategic, through the identification of long-term goals, and functional, through the identification of immediate and short-term actions that will guide day-to-day decision-making and project implementation. In addition to the identification and prioritization of possible mitigation projects, emphasis is placed on the use of program and policy alternatives to help make Augusta-Richmond County less vulnerable to the damaging forces of hazards while improving the economic, social, and environmental health of the community. The concept of multi-objective planning was emphasized throughout the planning process, particularly in identifying ways to link, where possible, hazard mitigation policies and programs with complimentary community goals related to disaster recovery, housing, economic development, recreational opportunities, transportation improvements, environmental quality, land development, and public health and safety. Plan Maintenance, found in Section 10, includes the measures that the jurisdictions participating in the plan will take to ensure the Plan’s continuous long-term implementation. The procedures also include the manner in which the Plan will be regularly evaluated and updated to remain a current and meaningful planning document. SSEECCTTIIOONN 22 PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:1 This section describes the planning process undertaken to develop the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan. It consists of the following eight subsections: 2.1 Overview of Hazard Mitigation Planning 2.2 History of Hazard Mitigation Planning in Augusta-Richmond County 2.3 Preparing the 2017 Plan 2.4 The Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team 2.5 Community Meetings and Workshops 2.6 Involving the Public 2.7 Involving the Stakeholders 2.8 Documentation of Plan Progress 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(1): The plan shall include documentation of the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process and how the public was involved. 2.1 OVERVIEW OF HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING Local hazard mitigation planning is the process of organizing community resources, identifying and assessing hazard risks, and determining how to best minimize or manage those risks. This process culminates in a hazard mitigation plan that identifies specific mitigation actions, each designed to achieve both short-term planning objectives and a long-term community vision. To ensure the functionality of a hazard mitigation plan, responsibility is assigned for each proposed mitigation action to a specific individual, department, or agency along with a schedule or target completion date for its implementation (see Section 10: Plan Maintenance). Plan maintenance procedures are established for the routine monitoring of implementation progress, as well as the evaluation and enhancement of the mitigation plan itself. These plan maintenance procedures ensure that the Plan remains a current, dynamic, and effective planning document over time that becomes integrated into the routine local decision making process. Communities that participate in hazard mitigation planning have the potential to accomplish many benefits, including: saving lives and property, saving money, speeding recovery following disasters, reducing future vulnerability through wise development and post-disaster recovery and reconstruction, SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:2 expediting the receipt of pre-disaster and post-disaster grant funding, and demonstrating a firm commitment to improving community health and safety. Typically, communities that participate in mitigation planning are described as having the potential to produce long-term and recurring benefits by breaking the repetitive cycle of disaster loss. A core assumption of hazard mitigation is that the investments made before a hazard event will significantly reduce the demand for post-disaster assistance by lessening the need for emergency response, repair, recovery, and reconstruction. Furthermore, mitigation practices will enable local residents, businesses, and industries to re-establish themselves in the wake of a disaster, getting the community economy back on track sooner and with less interruption. The benefits of mitigation planning go beyond solely reducing hazard vulnerability. Mitigation measures such as the acquisition or regulation of land in known hazard areas can help achieve multiple community goals, such as preserving open space, maintaining environmental health, and enhancing recreational opportunities. Thus, it is vitally important that any local mitigation planning process be integrated with other concurrent local planning efforts, and any proposed mitigation strategies must take into account other existing community goals or initiatives that will help complement or hinder their future implementation. 2.2 HISTORY OF HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING IN AUGUSTA- RICHMOND COUNTY Each of the three participating jurisdictions has a previously adopted hazard mitigation plan. The FEMA approval dates for this plan is listed below: Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blyth and Hephzibah Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (6/28/2012) City of Blyth City of Hephzibah The plan was developed using the multi-jurisdictional planning process recommended by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2.3 PREPARING THE 2017 PLAN Hazard mitigation plans, are required to be updated every five years to remain eligible for federal mitigation funding. To simplify planning efforts, the jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County decided to join together to create the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan. This allows resources to be shared amongst the participating jurisdictions and eases the administrative duties of all of the participants. To prepare the Plan, a team led by the consulting firm called Atkins was hired to provide professional mitigation planning services. To meet additional planning requirements of the Community Rating System (CRS), the county ensured that the planning process was facilitated under the direction of a professional planner. Ryan Wiedenman from Atkins served as the lead planner for this project and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP). Further, CRS planning requirements from SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:3 section 510 of the 2013 Coordinator’s Manual are addressed throughout this plan. The intent is to try to maximize the number of CRS points for those jurisdictions that may wish to join the CRS Program in the future. Per the contractual scope of work, the consultant team followed the mitigation planning process recommended by FEMA (Publication Series 386 and Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide) and recommendations provided by Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA) mitigation planning staff.1 The Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool, found in Appendix C, provides a detailed summary of FEMA’s current minimum standards of acceptability for compliance with DMA 2000 and notes the location where each requirement is met within this Plan. These standards are based upon FEMA’s Final Rule as published in the Federal Register in Part 201 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The Planning Team used FEMA’s Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide (October 2011) for reference as they completed the Plan. Additionally, the Planning Team determined that it was important to include and analyze technological and man-made hazards in the plan to provide a more comprehensive approach to hazard management within the county. Although this is not a requirement as per regulations regarding hazard mitigation planning at the state or federal level, it is a noteworthy step in the direction of an all-hazards approach to risk analysis and management. Key elements from the previously approved plan are referenced throughout the document (e.g., existing actions) and required a discussion of changes made. For example, all of the risk assessment elements needed to be updated to include most recent information. It was also necessary to review the goals for the county. The Capability Assessment section includes updated information for all of the participating jurisdictions and the Mitigation Action Plan provides implementation status updates for all of the actions identified in the previous plans. The process used to prepare this Plan included twelve major steps that were completed over the course of approximately eleven months beginning in June 2016. Each of these planning steps (illustrated in Figure 2.1) resulted in critical work products and outcomes that collectively make up the Plan. Specific plan sections are further described in Section 1: Introduction. Over the past five years, each participating jurisdiction has been actively working to implement the existing plan. This is documented in the Mitigation Action Plan through the implementation status updates for each of the Mitigation Actions. The Capability Assessment also documents changes and improvements in the capabilities of each participating jurisdiction to implement the Mitigation Strategy. 1 A copy of the negotiated contractual scope of work between Augusta-Richmond County and Atkins is available through Augusta-Richmond County upon request. SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:4 FIGURE 2.1: MITIGATION PLANNING PROCESS FOR AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY As is further detailed below, the planning process was conducted through Hazard Mitigation Planning Team meetings comprised primarily of local government staff from each of the participating jurisdictions and advisory stakeholders. 2.4 THE AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM In order to guide the development of this Plan, Augusta-Richmond County and its jurisdictions created the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (Hazard Mitigation Planning Team or Planning Team). The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team represents a community-based planning team made up of representatives from various county and municipal departments and other key stakeholders identified to serve as critical partners in the planning process. Beginning in June 2016, the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team members engaged in regular discussions as well as local meetings and planning workshops to discuss and complete tasks associated with preparing the Plan. This working group coordinated on all aspects of plan preparation and provided valuable input to the process. In addition to regular meetings, committee members routinely communicated and were kept informed through an e-mail distribution list. SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:5 Specifically, the tasks assigned to the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team members included: participate in Hazard Mitigation Planning Team meetings and workshops provide best available data as required for the risk assessment portion of the Plan provide information that will help complete the Capability Assessment section of the plan and provide copies of any mitigation or hazard-related documents for review and incorporation into the Plan support the development of the Mitigation Strategy, including the design and adoption of countywide goal statements help design and propose appropriate mitigation actions for their department/agency for incorporation into the Mitigation Action Plan review and provide timely comments on all study findings and draft plan deliverables support the adoption of the 2017 Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Table 2.1 lists the members of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team who were responsible for participating in the development of the Plan. Committee members are listed in alphabetical order by last name. TABLE 2.1: MEMBERS OF THE AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM NAME POSITION DEPARTMENT/AGENCY Jonathan Adriano District Program Manager East Central Health District Martha R. Allen City Clerk City of Hephzibah Sharon W. Bennett Emergency Management Specialist Augusta Emergency Management Agency Johnnie Boyd Captain Paine College Sharon Broady Director Augusta Animal Services John Caran Fire Marshal Augusta Fire Department Loriann Chancey City Clerk City of Blythe Jasper Cooke Director CEPAR Augusta University Sheila Fain Facility Management Coordinator Electrolux Larry Felix, Jr. Chief Ranger Georgia Forestry Jerry Germann -- CERT Team 17 Dee Griffin Public Information Officer/Fire Safety Educator Augusta Fire Department Gerald Hillman Operation Manager Richmond County Mosquito Control Michael Hogue Director, Emergency Department Trinity Hospital Christopher E. James Fire Chief, Emergency Management Agency Director Augusta Fire Department/ Emergency Management Agency Carrie Jones Events Manager Golden Harvest Food Bank Sterling Jones Interim Dept. Director Augusta 911 SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:6 NAME POSITION DEPARTMENT/AGENCY Mie Lucas Disaster Preparedness Coordinator Augusta Emergency Management Agency Rev. Nellie Pearl Merriweather -- CERT Shelby Meyers Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency Management and Homeland Security Agency John Miller Disaster Program Manager Red Cross Pamela Nestor -- CERT Vincent Pacchiana Emergency Manager Fort Gordon Laura Radford Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency Management and Homeland Security Agency Paul Reyes -- CERT Team 2 Jennifer Sosebee Assistant Director, Plant Ops/ Safety Office Trinity Hospital Gail Simpkins -- CERT Steven Strickland Major, Field Ops Richmond County Sheriff’s Office Byron W. Taylor Deputy Chief Augusta Fire Department Terri L. Turner Development Services Administrator Augusta Planning and Development Rodney Way Area Engineer Georgia Department of Transportation Tom Wiedmeier Director Augusta Utilities Dennis Williams Commissioner Augusta-Richmond County Commission District 2 Randy Wishard Environmental Health Director Environmental Health, Richmond County Health Department 2.4.1 Multi-Jurisdictional Participation The Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan includes Richmond County and its three incorporated municipalities. The City of Augusta operates in conjunction with Richmond County as part of a consolidated government and thus, these communities are treated as a single entity in this plan as there are no unincorporated areas within the county. To satisfy multi-jurisdictional participation requirements, the participating jurisdictions were required to perform the following tasks: Participate in mitigation planning workshops; Identify completed mitigation projects, if applicable; and Develop and adopt (or update) their local Mitigation Action Plan. Each jurisdiction participated in the planning process and has developed a local Mitigation Action Plan unique to their jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction will adopt the plan which includes the individual Mitigation Action Plan that provides the means for jurisdictions to monitor and update their Plan on a regular basis. SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:7 2.5 COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS The preparation of this Plan required a series of meetings and workshops for facilitating discussion, gaining consensus, and initiating data collection efforts with local government staff, community officials, and other identified stakeholders. More importantly, the meetings and workshops prompted continuous input and feedback from relevant participants throughout the drafting stages of the Plan. The following is a summary of the key meetings and community workshops held during the development of the plan update.2 In many cases, routine discussions and additional meetings were held by local staff to accomplish planning tasks specific to their department or agency, such as the approval of specific mitigation actions for their department or agency to undertake and include in the Mitigation Action Plan. August 5, 2016 Kick-off Meeting Augusta Commission Chambers Chief Christopher James, Fire Chief for the City of Augusta-Richmond County, opened the meeting by introducing himself and the consultant, Atkins. He outlined the process for developing and updating a hazard mitigation plan. He stated that the County could potentially receive funding for having a completed hazard mitigation plan. Margaret Walton, Project Manager from the project consultant Atkins, led the meeting and began by providing an overview of the agenda items and briefly reviewed each of the handouts that were distributed in the meeting packets (agenda and presentation slides). She then asked each of the meeting attendees to introduce themselves. Following introductions, she provided a brief overview of the meeting agenda and the stages of the mitigation planning process that would be addressed through this plan. Ms. Walton emphasized that mitigation refers to actions (projects, policies, plans) to reduce the impacts of future hazard events. The hazard mitigation planning process looks at hazards, capability to conduct mitigation, and specific activities to reduce impacts of hazards. She explained how Federal legislation requires local governments to have a hazard mitigation plan in place to remain eligible for federal mitigation grants such as the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, and Flood Mitigation Assistance Program so there is funding to implement some of the actions that this plan may identify. Ms. Walton then laid out all of the mitigation techniques/categories that mitigation actions fall into. She walked through the PowerPoint presentation to outline various examples of each technique and began a discussion of projects that the County and participating jurisdictions might pursue. Following this discussion, Ms. Walton led an icebreaker exercise. She provided instructions to attendees on how to complete the exercise. Attendees were given an equal amount of fictitious FEMA money ($20 each) and asked to spend it in the various mitigation categories. Money could be thought of as grant money that communities received towards mitigation or areas that they feel are more of a priority. Given the windfall of financial resources, attendees target their money towards areas of mitigation that are of greatest concern. Ideally, the exercise helps pinpoint areas of mitigation that the community may want to focus on when developing mitigation grants. Ms. Walton 2 Copies of agendas, sign-in sheets, and minutes for all meetings and workshops can be found in Appendix D. SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:8 explained that the results would be presented at the next Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee meeting. The results were: Public Education and Awareness- 97 Prevention- 82 Property Protection- 77 Emergency Services- 72 Structural Projects- 47 Natural Resource Protection- 40 Ms. Walton shared the objectives of the plan to include updating the document for Augusta-Richmond County, maintaining funding eligibility for the City/County and its two municipalities, initiate the Community Rating System (CRS) for the jurisdictions, potential projects identification, public education and awareness, and State and Federal compliance. Then she spent some time explaining the CRS program and the benefits of it for a community as well as the ways to capitalize on points to gain a better class for the community thereby reducing flood insurance premiums for citizens. Ms. Walton outlined the municipalities’ roles in the processes and what would be needed to assist in developing the plan. The cycle of the project tasks was also shared and each phase was described to include the planning process and risk assessment. Ms. Walton explained that in the risk assessment portion of the plan development that FEMA requires that plans address natural hazards, but an all-hazards approach is becoming more prevalent. She shared the previous hazards that were identified in the plan and asked the group to possibly decide if there were additional hazards they would like to add to the list. Additional hazards that were suggested were cyberterrorism, utility failure, infectious disease, climate adaptation, and solar EMP. Some manmade/technological hazards were included in the previous hazard identification, but the vulnerability assessment focuses more on the natural hazards since more mitigation funding is available for natural hazards. Capability Assessment Ms. Walton explained the community capability assessment and discussed how capability is divided primarily into 3 categories: Administrative Technical Fiscal Mitigation Strategy Ms. Walton discussed mitigation strategy and how it is developed. She stated that mitigation goals come from the existing plan and maybe adjusted and objectives may be added if the City/County desires to do that. The current mitigation actions will be updated as well with their status. However, all of the jurisdictions will need to develop new actions as well based on the risk assessment. She continued the presentation by discussing the necessary documentation for the planning process, the rapid project schedule, and the project team. Public Involvement SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:9 Ms. Walton explained how public comment and participation is a required part of this process. A public survey was developed that the City/County will be placing on their website. The link will be shared electronically following the meeting and local academic institutions were asked to disseminate the survey as well. Next, Ms. Walton discussed the roles and responsibilities of all the parties involved as well as the expectations on the level of involvement. The Atkins team will provide technical assistance, data collection, facilitation, and plan preparation. The City/County and jurisdictions were asked to be active participants by assisting with data collection, public awareness, hosting committee meetings, mitigation strategy, plan feedback, and plan adoption. The next steps are to initiate data collection with the risk assessment and capability assessment. The floor was opened for questions and comments. Ms. Walton then adjourned the meeting. November 4, 2016 Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategy Meeting Augusta Commission Chambers Chief Christopher James introduced himself and the project team from Atkins. He explained that this is a large part of our planning effort and appreciated everyone coming. Chief James then turned the meeting over to Ms. Walton, the project manager for Atkins. She asked who in the audience did not attend the previous meeting and asked them to introduce themselves. Individuals were from Emergency Management, Trinity Hospital, Electrolux, Augusta University, Augusta Utilities, Animal Services, Fire, City of Hephzibah, and Public Health. She mentioned that the meeting and presentation were informal and could be interrupted for any questions. Ms. Walton emphasized the importance of the potential funding for the participating jurisdictions and entities. Ryan Wiedenman led the next portion of the meeting regarding the risk assessment. He explained that the planning team worked together to build a list of potential hazards. Mr. Wiedenman with Atkins then presented the findings of the risk assessment. He stated that the risk assessment is the base of the mitigation plan and that we now have better data to update the hazard history. Mr. Wiedenman identified the three pieces of the risk assessment and the caveats for the risk assessment. He reviewed the Presidential Disaster Declarations that have impacted the region. He then explained the process for preparing Hazard Profiles and discussed how each hazard falls into one of four basic categories: Atmospheric, Hydrologic, Geologic, and Other. He indicated that each hazard must be evaluated and formally ruled out if it is not applicable to the study area, even where it seems obvious (such as in the case of landslide). SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:10 Mr. Wiedenman reviewed the Hazard Profiles and the following bullets summarize the information presented: CLIMATE CHANGE. It has been measured to some degree but not near as significantly as future occurrences. Future occurrences are likely. DROUGHT. There have been 0 events recorded since 1996 according to NCDC. Future occurrences are highly likely. The previous plan notes 3 severe droughts in 1986, 1998, and 2003. EARTHQUAKES. There have been 24 recorded earthquake events since 1812. There were 21 in Augusta and 3 in Hephzibah. The strongest had a recorded magnitude of VIII (MMI). Future occurrences are possible. EXTREME HEAT. There have been 0 recorded events since 1996 at the county level. Future occurrences are highly likely. FLOOD. There have been 24 flood events since 1996, 23 of them in Augusta and 1 at Ft. Gordon. Future occurrences are highly likely. HAIL. There have been 72 recorded events since 1955 at the county level; 55 in Augusta, 11 in Hephzibah, and 6 at Ft. Gordon. $30,716 in property damages were reported. Future occurrences are highly likely. HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS. There have been 74 storm tracks that have come within 75 miles of the region since 1850. Future occurrences are likely. INFECTIOUS DISEASE OUTBREAK. Highly contagious types of infectious diseases have potential to cause major problems in concentrated areas. Future occurrences are possible. LIGHTNING. There has been 1 recorded lightning event in the region since 2012 resulting in $167,703 in reported property damages. 0 deaths and 3 injuries were reported. Future occurrences are highly likely. WINTER STORM AND FREEZE. There have been 8 recorded events since 2002. No deaths and 1 injury was reported. Future occurrences are likely. SOLAR EMP. There have been no major events recorded. Future occurrences are likely. TORNADOES. There have been 10 recorded tornado events reported since 1954. No deaths and 1 injury was reported. Future occurrences are likely. THUNDERSTORM / HIGH WINDS. There have been 182 thunderstorm events reported since 1955, 156 in Augusta, 12 in Hephzibah, and 9 at Ft. Gordon. 1 death and 36 injuries were reported. The County 4 million dollars reported in property damages. Future occurrences are highly likely. WILDFIRE. The average is 38 fires annually. The annual average is 129 acres annually. Future occurrences are likely. SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:11 CHEMICAL HAZARD. 339 reported events since 1971. 21 were reported as serious incidents as well as 27 injuries. Future occurrences are highly likely. $771,913 has been reported in property damage. CYBER TERRORISM. No previous cyber-attacks have occurred. Future occurrences are possible. DAM AND LEVEE FAILURE. No recorded events in the County. Future occurrences are unlikely. NUCLEAR PLANT INCIDENT. No major incidents have been reported. Future occurrences are unlikely. TERRORISM. No major events have occurred in the County. Future events are possible. UTILITY FAILURE (Power/Water). No events have been recorded. Ice storms or strong wind events are typically the cause. Future occurrences are possible. During the hazard profile portion, specifics on each hazard were discussed. The initial hazard of discussion was climate change and it was suggested that it is a mix of drought and flooding. There was also some discussion on the number of repetitive loss properties. The group also requested that hail, tornado, and thunderstorm be examined separately. The Director of Public Health also shared that he had more updated infectious disease statistics that can be included. The committee suggested that more winter storm was available as well. Mr. Wiedenman stated that he tries to look at all of the hazards objectively. The results of the hazard identification process were used to generate a Priority Risk Index (PRI), which categorizes and prioritizes potential hazards as high, moderate or low risk based on probability, impact, spatial extent, warning time, and duration. The highest PRI was assigned to Flood, Climate Change, Chemical Hazard, Drought, Extreme Heat, and Hurricane/Tropical Storm. It was decided that Hurricane/Tropical Storm and Severe Winter Storm should both be moved to moderate based on justification from the group. The discussion continued with the area experiences more windstorms to straight line winds over hurricane and this provide the rationale to lower the severity of Hurricane/Tropical Storm. Another topic of discussion was the idea of separating chemical hazards into fixed site incidents and transportation incidents and placing both of them in the high range. It was also suggested that climate change could be viewed as the effect from other hazards instead of a separate risk. Ms. Walton then began the overview of the capability assessment. She stated the mechanism for how the capabilities are measured to include planning and regulatory capability, administrative and technical capability, fiscal capability, and political capability. Capability indicators included: National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Participation Community Rating System (CRS) Participation Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) Local Capability Assessment Survey Inventory and evaluation of existing plans, policies, programs and ordinances Measures administrative, technical, fiscal and political capability Ms. Walton stated that the current capabilities overall vary based on the size of the jurisdiction but that initiating the CRS program would provide a significant benefit to the community. SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:12 Next, Ms. Walton gave an overview of the public participation survey. She highlighted how the survey was disseminated and that 409 completed surveys were received. The highlights included that 90% of respondents are interested in making the community more resistant to hazards; 43% have already taken action to make their residences/homes/neighborhoods more hazard resistant; and 47% do not know who to contact regarding risk reduction. The variety of responses for each question were shared. The overarching summary shared that the highest importance was placed on emergency services, prevention, and public education and awareness. The next portion of the meeting was focused on the mitigation strategy. Ms. Walton explained that the mitigation strategy stems from the findings of the risk assessment and public survey along with the capability assessment that will be completed and that the main purpose is to develop an action plan which is the most important part of the plan. Additional handouts of the mitigation action worksheet and potential mitigation goals were distributed. It was shared that the general idea of protecting life, health, and the safety of all citizens should be the focus. Information on exactly how to update the existing was detailed and examples were given. The steps to developing new mitigation actions were outlined as well and examples were given that might pertain to Augusta-Richmond County. Ms. Walton also reminded the group about the repetitive loss properties in the area as a reminder that actions for mitigating flooding should be included. She also connected back to the capability assessment to encourage actions related to areas of weakness for the City-County. Lastly, Ms. Walton stated that she would send the mitigation strategy documents out electronically and that she needed all feedback by December 2. Finally, the next steps of completing the mitigation strategy, drafting the plan, and submitting it were shared. She stated that she would be available to assist with mitigation action development and then asked if there were any questions. She then thanked the Committee for taking the time to attend and the meeting was adjourned. 2.6 INVOLVING THE PUBLIC 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(b)(1): The planning process shall include an opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval. An important component of the mitigation planning process involved public participation. Individual citizen and community-based input provides the entire planning team with a greater understanding of local concerns and increases the likelihood of successfully implementing mitigation actions by developing community “buy-in” from those directly affected by the decisions of public officials. As citizens become more involved in decisions that affect their safety, they are more likely to gain a greater appreciation of the hazards present in their community and take the steps necessary to reduce their impact. Public awareness is a key component of any community’s overall mitigation strategy aimed at making a home, neighborhood, school, business or entire city safer from the potential effects of hazards. Public involvement in the development of the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan was sought using three methods: (1) public meetings were held and were advertised in local media; (2) public survey instruments were made available in hard copy and online; and (3) the draft Plan deliverables were made available on the City website along with contact information for providing input. SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:13 The general public was provided three opportunities to be involved in the development of the county plan: (1) twice during the drafting stage of the Plan; and (2) upon completion of a final draft Plan, but prior to official Plan approval and adoption. During the drafting stage, open public meetings were held on August 5, 2016 and November 4, 2016. A final public meeting was held at the end of the planning process on XXX. Additional information on these meetings can be found in Appendix D. In addition, a public participation survey (discussed in greater detail in Section 2.6.1) was made available during the planning process at various locations throughout the county and on the City website. A final open public meeting was held on XXXXX at XXXXX. The meeting, specifically held to discuss the hazard mitigation plan, was held more than two weeks prior to most plan adoption dates and was advertised by the participating jurisdictions on community websites and through community newsletters and ebulletins. The purpose of the meeting was to present the final plan and its findings and recommendations and so that the public could ask questions and submit any final comments for review, consideration, and potential modification of the plan. No additional public comments for the plan were provided at this meeting. The meeting agenda and sign-in sheet are included in Appendix D. 2.6.1 Public Survey The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team was successful in getting citizens to provide input to the mitigation planning process through the use of the Public Participation Survey. The Public Participation Survey was designed to capture data and information from residents of Augusta-Richmond County that might not be able to attend public meetings or participate through other means in the mitigation planning process. Copies of the Public Participation Survey were distributed to the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team to be made available for residents to complete at local public offices. A link to an electronic version of the survey was also posted on the City website. A total of 409 survey responses were received, which provided valuable input for the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team to consider in the development of the plan update. Selected survey results are presented below. Approximately 49 percent of survey respondents had been impacted by a disaster, mainly winter/ice storms, tornadoes, hurricanes/tropical storms, floods, and severe storms/high wind. Respondents ranked Severe Winter Storm as the highest threat to their neighborhood (50 percent), followed by Nuclear Plant Incident (40 percent), Tornado (35 percent), Chemical Hazard (32 percent), and Extreme Heat (32 percent). Approximately 43 percent of respondents have taken actions to make their homes more resistant to hazards and 90 percent are interested in making their homes more resistant to hazards. 47 percent of respondents do not know what office to contact regarding reducing their risks to hazards. Emergency Services, Prevention, and Public Education and Awareness were ranked as the most important activities for communities to pursue in reducing risks. SECTION 2: PLANNING PROCESS Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 2:14 A copy of the survey is provided in Appendix B and a detailed summary of the survey results are provided in Appendix D. 2.7 INVOLVING THE STAKEHOLDERS 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(b)(2): The planning process shall include an opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, and agencies that have the authority to regulate development, as well as businesses, academia and other non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process. At the beginning of the planning process for the development of this plan, the project consultant worked with the City Emergency Management Coordinator to initiate outreach to stakeholders to be involved in the planning process. The project consultant sent out a list of recommended stakeholders provided from FEMA Publication 386-1 titled Getting Started: Building Support for Mitigation Planning. The list of recommended stakeholders is found in Appendix C of that publication (Worksheet #1: Build the Planning Team) and has been included in Appendix B of this plan to demonstrate the wide range of stakeholders that were considered to participate in the development of this plan. The City Emergency Management Coordinator used that list for reference as they invited stakeholders to participate in the planning process. In addition to the efforts described above, the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team encouraged more open and widespread participation in the mitigation planning process by designing and distributing the Public Participation Survey. These opportunities were provided for local officials, residents, businesses, academia, and other private interests in the county to be involved and offer input throughout the local mitigation planning process. 2.8 DOCUMENTATION OF PLAN PROGRESS Progress in hazard mitigation planning for the participating jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County is documented in this plan update. Since hazard mitigation planning efforts officially began in the participating counties with the development of the initial Hazard Mitigation Plans in the late 1990s and early 2000s, many mitigation actions have been completed and implemented in the participating jurisdictions. These actions will help reduce the overall risk to natural hazards for the people and property in Augusta-Richmond County. The actions that have been completed are documented in the Mitigation Action Plan found in Section 9. In addition, community capability continues to improve with the implementation of new plans, policies, and programs that help to promote hazard mitigation at the local level. The current state of local capabilities for the participating jurisdictions is captured in Section 7: Capability Assessment. The participating jurisdictions continue to demonstrate their commitment to hazard mitigation and hazard mitigation planning and have proven this by developing the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team to update the Plan and by continuing to involve the public in the hazard mitigation planning process. SSEECCTTIIOONN 33 COMMUNITY PROFILE Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 3:1 This section of the Plan provides a general overview of Augusta-Richmond County and its participating municipalities. It consists of the following four subsections: 3.1 Geography and the Environment 3.2 Population and Demographics 3.3 Housing, Infrastructure, and Land Use 3.4 Employment and Industry 3.1 GEOGRAPHY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Augusta-Richmond County is located in the east central section of Georgia, approximately 150 miles east of Atlanta on Interstate 20. In 1996, the City of Augusta consolidated with Richmond County to form Augusta-Richmond County. The cities of Blyth and Hephzibah are separate municipalities charted by the State of Georgia which are also included in this plan. Additionally, Fort Gordon occupies a large section of the southwest part of the county and, although it is not an incorporated municipality, it is treated as a separate entity for the purposes of this plan. An orientation map is provided as Figure 3.1. Augusta-Richmond County is situated in three major land resources areas: the Southern Piedmont, the Carolina and Georgia Sand Hills, and the Southern Coastal Plain. The Southern Piedmont covers the extreme northern part of the county and consists of broad to narrow ridgetops and long irregular hillsides bisected by numerous small winding drainageways. The Carolina and Georgia Sand Hills are located in the northern and western parts of the county and separate the Southern Piedmont from the Southern Coastal Plain. The Southern Coastal Plain covers the southern and southeastern parts of the county and is characterized by broad ridgetops and hillsides extending to drainageways. Nearly level floodplains of the Savannah River are located in the eastern and northern parts of the county and on the narrower basins of its tributaries. Elevations range between 100 and 140 feet along the Savannah River and 500 feet or more on high ridges on Fort Gordon. More than half of the total land area has a slope of less than 5 percent, and more than 85 percent of the land has less than 10 percent slope. Less than 2 percent of the land area has slop greater than 15 percent. The steepest slopes are found along Butler, Spirit, and Little Spirit Creeks. The majority of areas with steep slopes are either within floodplains, which are regulated by local ordinance, or are located on Fort Gordon. SECTION 3: COMMUNITY PROFILE Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 3:2 FIGURE 3.1: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY ORIENTATION MAP The total land area of each of the participating jurisdictions is presented in Table 3.1. TABLE 3.1: TOTAL LAND AREAS OF PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS Jurisdiction Total Land Area Augusta-Richmond County 229.39 square miles Blythe 2.56 square miles Fort Gordon 69.43 square miles Hephzibah 19.51 square miles Source: Augusta GIS Augusta-Richmond County has a humid subtropical climate. It experiences mild winters and a humid summer. The average high temperature for the summer months is 90.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Summer daytime temperatures can soar to 100 degrees Fahrenheit or above. The average low temperature is 67.8 degrees Fahrenheit. The average high temperature for the winter months is 58.9 degrees Fahrenheit; the average low temperature is 34.4 degrees Fahrenheit. SECTION 3: COMMUNITY PROFILE Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 3:3 Snowfall is not nearly as common as in Atlanta, due largely to Augusta’s elevation, with down Augusta being about 900 feet lower than downtown Atlanta. Still, snow flurries are typically seen annually. Freezing rain is also a threat in wintertime. Augusta-Richmond County has a relatively mild climate characterized by long hot summers and short cool winters. Prevailing winds are from the southeast and southwest, bringing in moist tropical air from the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. In summer, the average temperature is 79 degrees Fahrenheit, and the average daily high exceeds 90 degrees Fahrenheit in June, July, and August. In winter, the average temperature is 47 degrees Fahrenheit, and the average daily minimum temperature is 35 degrees Fahrenheit. Total annual precipitation is 46 inches, with 23 inches falling in April through September. Annual precipitation amounts have been below normal for the last 50 years. The average relative humidity in mid-afternoon is about 50 percent. Humidity is higher at night, and the average at dawn is about 90 percent. 3.2 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS Between 2000 and 2010, the county experienced minimal population growth. However, Fort Gordon had a higher rate of growth compared to the rest of the county. Population counts from the U.S. Census Bureau for 1990, 2000, and 2010 for each of the participating jurisdictions are presented in Table 3.2. TABLE 3.2: POPULATION COUNTS FOR PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS Jurisdiction 1990 Census Population 2000 Census Population 2010 Census Population % Change 2000-2010 Richmond County 189,719 199,775 200,549 0.4% Augusta-Richmond County (balance)* 177,816 187,428 186,852 -0.3% Blythe† 300 718 721 0.4% Fort Gordon CCD‡ 9,140 7,754 8,992 16.0% Hephzibah 2,466 3,880 4,011 3.4% *1990 Census data for unincorporated Richmond County excluding Fort Gordon (133,177) and the City of Augusta (44,639) were combined to provide a better comparison with 2000 and 2010 data after the city and county were consolidated. †The population counts for the City of Blythe include population residing in neighboring Burke County (3 in 1990, 5 in 2000, and 27 in 2010). Note: these populations are not included in the Richmond County total. ‡A Census County Division (CCD) is a subdivision of a county that is a relatively permanent statistical area. The population counts for Fort Gordon CCD were subtracted from the Augusta-Richmond County balance counts (195,182 in 2000 and 195,844 in 2010) to prevent duplication. Source: United States Census Bureau, 1990, 2000, and 2010 Census Based on the 2010 Census, the median age of residents in Augusta-Richmond County is 33.2. The racial characteristics of the participating jurisdictions are presented in Table 3.3. Generally, African Americans make up the majority of the population in the county accounting for over 54 percent of the population overall. However, the cities of Blythe and Hephzibah as well as Fort Gordon have majority populations that are Caucasian. SECTION 3: COMMUNITY PROFILE Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 3:4 TABLE 3.3: DEMOGRAPHICS OF PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS Jurisdiction White, Percent (2010) Black or African American, Percent (2010) American Indian or Alaska Native, Percent (2010) Asian, Percent (2010) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Percent (2010) Other Race, Percent (2010) Two or More Races, percent (2010) Persons of Hispanic Origin, Percent (2010)* Richmond County 39.7% 54.2% 0.3% 1.7% 0.2% 1.3% 2.6% 4.1% Augusta-Richmond County (balance) 38.1% 56.1% 0.3% 1.6% 0.2% 1.2% 2.4% 3.6% Blythe 81.1% 14.0% 0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 1.1% 2.8% 4.3% Fort Gordon CCD‡ 59.7% 26.9% 0.7% 2.6% 0.6% 3.5% 5.9% 14.1% Hephzibah 62.1% 33.7% 0.2% 0.4% 0.1% 0.6% 2.9% 3.1% *Hispanics may be of any race, so also are included in applicable race categories ‡A Census County Division (CCD) is a subdivision of a county that is a relatively permanent statistical area. The demographic counts for Fort Gordon CCD were removed from the Augusta-Richmond County balance counts to prevent duplication. Source: United States Census Bureau, 2010 Census 3.3 HOUSING, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND LAND USE 3.3.1 Housing According to the 2010 U.S. Census, there were 86,331 housing units in Augusta-Richmond County, the majority of which are single family homes. Housing information for each of the participating jurisdictions is presented in Table 3.4. As shown in the table, Augusta-Richmond County has a very low percentage of seasonal housing across the jurisdictions; however, the City of Blythe has a slightly higher rate compared to the rest of the county. TABLE 3.4: HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICIPATING JURISDICTIONS Jurisdiction Housing Units (2000) Housing Units (2010) Seasonal Units, Percent (2010) Median Home Value (2011-2015) Richmond County 82,312 86,331 0.5% $101,900 Augusta-Richmond County (balance) 79,590 83,265 0.5% $101,900 Blythe† 262 305 2.0% $82,900 Fort Gordon CCD‡ 891 1,162 0.0% -- Hephzibah 1,570 1,613 0.5% $117,000 †The housing unit counts for the City of Blythe include units located in neighboring Burke County (1 in 2000 and 14 in 2010). Note: these housing units are not included in the Richmond County total. ‡A Census County Division (CCD) is a subdivision of a county that is a relatively permanent statistical area. The housing counts for Fort Gordon CCD were subtracted from the Augusta-Richmond County balance counts (80,481 in 2000 and 84,427 in 2010) to prevent duplication. Source: United States Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates SECTION 3: COMMUNITY PROFILE Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 3:5 3.3.2 Infrastructure Transportation Augusta-Richmond County is served by a road network that includes a mix of interstate highways, federal highways, and state routes as well as numerous local roads. The county is well connected to the surrounding areas in Georgia and South Carolina. Interstate 20 runs east to west crossing the northwestern corner of the county and linking Atlanta, Georgia and Columbia, South Carolina. Interstate 510 (known as Bobby Jones Expressway in Georgia and as Palmetto Parkway in South Carolina) is an auxiliary circumferential interstate that begins in the northern part of Augusta-Richmond County, encircles Augusta, and converges with Interstate 20 in North Augusta, South Carolina. U.S. 1 runs north to south through Georgia linking Charlton County in southern Georgia with Augusta-Richmond County and also connecting it with the Sandhills region of South Carolina. U.S. 25 connects Brunswick, Georgia to Augusta-Richmond County before crossing the Savannah River into South Carolina. U.S. 78 connects Haralson County, Georgia with Augusta-Richmond County and continues on to Charleston, South Carolina. U.S. 278 is an east-west highway that connects Augusta-Richmond County with Cedartown, Georgia on the Georgia/Alabama state line and with Hilton Head Island in South Carolina. The Augusta Regional Airport [at Bush Field] serves Augusta-Richmond County. The airport is a city- owned and operated, public use airport. Currently, two primary commercial airlines operate daily services to Atlanta, Georgia and Charlotte, North Carolina. A second smaller airport, Daniel Field, also operates in Augusta-Richmond County. This airport is publicly owned and operated by the General Aviation Commission and it is primarily used by corporate and private clients for business and recreational purposes. Passenger rail service is not available in Augusta-Richmond County at this time. However, freight service is provided by two railroads, Norfolk Southern and CSX Transportation, Inc. Augusta-Richmond County also provides comprehensive public transportation services through Augusta Public Transits. These include the fixed route bus service that operates 9 fixed routes, access to ADA (Para transit) service, and the Richmond Rural Transit service. Utilities Electrical power in Augusta-Richmond County is provided by Georgia Power and Jefferson Energy Cooperative. Georgia Power is a major provider across the state of Georgia. Jefferson Energy Cooperative is an electric cooperative that supplies electric services to 11 counties within Georgia, including a portion of Augusta-Richmond County. Natural gas deregulation in Georgia allows Atlanta Gaslight Company to store and distribute natural gas in its facilities (pipelines, storage facilities, and other supporting services) and marketers to sell this natural gas to consumers. As a result, consumers are able to choose their natural gas supplier and there are a number of certified independent gas suppliers that serve Augusta-Richmond County. The Augusta Utilities Department is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the water and sewerage systems in Augusta-Richmond County. Generally, the service area can be characterized as having complete water service coverage for potential customers who wish to connect to the system. An agreement was signed by Augusta-Richmond County and Fort Gordon to provide water and wastewater services on Fort Gordon for 50 years starting in 2008. The cities of Blythe and Hephzibah provide water SECTION 3: COMMUNITY PROFILE Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 3:6 service within their respective jurisdictions. Fort Gordon and the cities of Blythe and Hephzibah have separate sewer systems. Community Facilities There are a number of public buildings and community facilities located throughout Augusta-Richmond County. According to the data collected for the vulnerability assessment (Section 6.4.1), there are 3 emergency management facilities, 24 fire stations, 27 government facilities, 13 law enforcement facilities, 25 medical facilities, 6 private sector facilities, 81 schools, 7 transportation facilities, 12 universities, and 33 utility facilities located within the study area. Augusta-Richmond County has a long history of service in the field of medicine. There are several major medical hospitals in Augusta-Richmond County. These facilities include acute care hospitals, psychiatric facilities, and extended care centers, such as University Hospital, Charlie Norwood Veterans Administration Medical Center, Trinity Hospital of Augusta (formerly St. Joseph Hospital), Walton Rehabilitation Hospital, Doctors Hospital, East Central Regional Hospital at Augusta, Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Medical College of Georgia (MCG) and Hospitals, and Select Specialty Hospital. Augusta-Richmond County also offers many cultural amenities including six library branches, multiple museums, a civic center, auditoriums, and performing arts facilities as well as other attractions such as the Riverwalk Augusta, Augusta Botanical Gardens, Springfield Village Park, Augusta Common, Lake Olmstead Stadium, Phinizy Swamp Nature Park, and Augusta Canal National Heritage Area. 3.3.3 Land Use Augusta-Richmond County is characterized by land uses reflecting an older city combined with newer suburbs and semi-rural areas. Land use within the old city limits (prior to consolidation) includes neighborhoods of varying ages, a central business district, concentrations of public/institutional uses commercial uses in shopping centers and on individual sites, and industrial uses on scattered sites. These uses are connected by a series of streets and highways, most of which are laid out on a grid pattern. In many cases, residential, commercial, and industrial uses are in close proximity to one another, reflecting development that occurred prior to enactment of the local zoning ordinance. In contrast, the land that was formerly in unincorporated Richmond County is characterized by a land use pattern more like a community that developed after World War II. Major urban land uses (residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional) are separated from one another. Strip commercial development is prevalent along all of the major arterial highways and consists of shopping centers, office complexes, and businesses on individual sites. Major manufacturing plants are situated in industrial parks or on individual sites in close proximity to highways and railroad lines. At the fringe of the urbanized area, development becomes sparse and gives way to more open space, the occasional farm, residences on larger lots, and woodlands. Local land use and associated regulations are further discussed in Section 7: Capability Assessment. 3.4 EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRY Augusta-Richmond County has a diversified economy. Employment is highest in the service, retail trade, and manufacturing sectors. Manufacturing facilities in the city produce textiles, paper products, chemicals, transportation equipment, and food products. Retail trade establishments are located in the SECTION 3: COMMUNITY PROFILE Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 3:7 downtown, in shopping centers on major roads, and on individual sites and provide for the daily needs of area residents. Large facilities such as Augusta Mall and Augusta Exchange draw customers from throughout the region. Major employers in the service sector include health care and related facilities, educational institutions, and business service establishments. Nine hospitals are the most visible component of the health care industry. Additional health care jobs are provided at clinics, nursing homes, laboratories, and the offices of doctors, dentists, and other health care practitioners. Major educational institutions providing employment include the Medical College of Georgia, Paine College, Augusta State University, Augusta Technical College, and the Richmond County Board of Education. According to the 2011 to 2015 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates, in 2015, Augusta- Richmond County had an average annual employment of 76,807 workers and an average unemployment rate of 12.0 percent (compared to 9.07 percent for the state). In 2015, the Educational Services, and Health Care and Social Assistance industry employed 25.9 percent of the workforce followed by Retail Trade (13.1%); Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation, and Accommodation and Food Services (11.2%); Professional, Scientific, and Management, and Administrative and Waste Management Services (10.3%); and Manufacturing (9.5%). In 2015, the average annual median household income in Augusta-Richmond County was $37,424 compared to $49,620 in the state of Georgia. SSEECCTTIIOONN 44 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:1 This section describes how the planning team identified the hazards to be included in this plan. It consists of the following five subsections: 4.1 Overview 4.2 Description of Full Range of Hazards 4.3 Disaster Declarations 4.4 Hazard Evaluation 4.5 Hazard Identification Results 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(2)(i): The risk assessment shall include a description of the type, location and extent of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events. 4.1 OVERVIEW Augusta-Richmond County is vulnerable to a wide range of natural and human-caused hazards that threaten life and property. Current FEMA regulations and guidance under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) require, at a minimum, an evaluation of a full range of natural hazards. An evaluation of human-caused hazards (i.e., technological hazards, terrorism, etc.) is encouraged, though not required, for plan approval. Augusta-Richmond County has included an assessment of both types of hazards. Upon a review of the full range of natural hazards suggested under FEMA planning guidance, the participating jurisdictions in the Augusta-Richmond County planning area (Richmond County, City of Augusta, City of Blythe, City of Hephzibah) have identified a number of hazards that are to be addressed in their Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. These hazards were identified through an extensive process that utilized input from Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team members, research of past disaster declarations in the county,1 and review of the Georgia State Hazard Mitigation Plan. Readily available information from reputable sources (such as federal and state agencies) was also evaluated to supplement information from these key sources. Table 4.1 lists the full range of hazards initially identified for inclusion in the Plan and provides a brief description for each. This table includes 29 individual hazards. Some of these hazards are considered to be interrelated or cascading, but for preliminary hazard identification purposes these individual hazards are broken out separately. Next, Table 4.2 lists the disaster declarations in Augusta-Richmond County. 1 A complete list of disaster declarations for Augusta-Richmond County can be found below in Section 4.3. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:2 Next, Table 4.3 documents the evaluation process used for determining which of the initially identified hazards are considered significant enough to warrant further evaluation in the risk assessment. For each hazard considered, the table indicates whether or not the hazard was identified as a significant hazard to be further assessed, how this determination was made, and why this determination was made. The table works to summarize not only those hazards that were identified (and why) but also those that were not identified (and why not). Hazard events not identified for inclusion at this time may be addressed during future evaluations and updates of the risk assessment if deemed necessary by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team during the plan update process. Lastly, Table 4.4 provides a summary of the hazard identification and evaluation process noting that 19 of the 29 initially identified hazards are considered significant enough for further evaluation through this Plan’s risk assessment (marked with a “”). It should also be noted that in addition to the hazards listed below, this plan also considers the impacts of climate change on Augusta-Richmond County. Since climate change will have the greatest effect in terms of how it exacerbates other hazards already identified in this plan, it was not identified as its own hazard in this section of the plan, but its impacts will be discussed further in Sections 5 and 6 of the plan. 4.2 DESCRIPTION OF FULL RANGE OF HAZARDS TABLE 4.1: DESCRIPTIONS OF THE FULL RANGE OF INITIALLY IDENTIFIED HAZARDS Hazard Description NATURAL HAZARDS Avalanche A rapid fall or slide of a large mass of snow down a mountainside. Drought A prolonged period of less than normal precipitation such that the lack of water causes a serious hydrologic imbalance. Common effects of drought include crop failure, water supply shortages, and fish and wildlife mortality. High temperatures, high winds, and low humidity can worsen drought conditions and also make areas more susceptible to wildfire. Human demands and actions have the ability to hasten or mitigate drought-related impacts on local communities. Earthquake A sudden, rapid shaking of the Earth caused by the breaking and shifting of rock beneath the surface. This movement forces the gradual building and accumulation of energy. Eventually, strain becomes so great that the energy is abruptly released, causing the shaking at the earth’s surface which we know as an earthquake. Roughly 90 percent of all earthquakes occur at the boundaries where plates meet, although it is possible for earthquakes to occur entirely within plates. Earthquakes can affect hundreds of thousands of square miles; cause damage to property measured in the tens of billions of dollars; result in loss of life and injury to hundreds of thousands of persons; and disrupt the social and economic functioning of the affected area. Erosion Erosion is the gradual breakdown and movement of land due to both physical and chemical processes of water, wind, and general meteorological conditions. Natural, or geologic, erosion has occurred since the Earth’s formation and continues at a very slow and uniform rate each year. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:3 Expansive Soils Soils that will exhibit some degree of volume change with variations in moisture conditions. The most important properties affecting degree of volume change in a soil are clay mineralogy and the aqueous environment. Expansive soils will exhibit expansion caused by the intake of water and, conversely, will exhibit contraction when moisture is removed by drying. Generally speaking, they often appear sticky when wet, and are characterized by surface cracks when dry. Expansive soils become a problem when structures are built upon them without taking proper design precautions into account with regard to soil type. Cracking in walls and floors can be minor, or can be severe enough for the home to be structurally unsafe. Extreme Cold Extreme cold is generally considered to occur when the temperature is at or below freezing for a period of time. Often these events are associated with winter storms and other winter weather, but extreme cold events can occur on their own. Dangers associated with extreme cold events include frostbite and hypothermia among other impacts to people and these events can often last for several days or weeks in a row. Extreme Heat A heat wave may occur when temperatures hover 10 degrees or more above the average high temperature for the region and last for several weeks. Humid or muggy conditions, which add to the discomfort of high temperatures, occur when a “dome” of high atmospheric pressure traps hazy, damp air near the ground. Excessively dry and hot conditions can provoke dust storms and low visibility. A heat wave combined with a drought can be very dangerous and have severe economic consequences on a community. Flooding The accumulation of water within a water body which results in the overflow of excess water onto adjacent lands, usually floodplains. The floodplain is the land adjoining the channel of a river, stream ocean, lake or other watercourse or water body that is susceptible to flooding. Most floods fall into the following three categories: riverine flooding, coastal flooding, or shallow flooding (where shallow flooding refers to sheet flow, ponding and urban drainage). Hail Any storm that produces hailstones that fall to the ground; usually used when the amount or size of the hail is considered significant. Hail is formed when updrafts in thunderstorms carry raindrops into parts of the atmosphere where the temperatures are below freezing. Hurricane/Tropical Storm Hurricanes and tropical storms are classified as cyclones and defined as any closed circulation developing around a low-pressure center in which the winds rotate counter-clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere (or clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere) and with a diameter averaging 10 to 30 miles across. When maximum sustained winds reach or exceed 39 miles per hour, the system is designated a tropical storm, given a name, and is closely monitored by the National Hurricane Center. When sustained winds reach or exceed 74 miles per hour the storm is deemed a hurricane. The primary damaging forces associated with these storms are high-level sustained winds, heavy precipitation and tornadoes. Coastal areas are also vulnerable to the additional forces of storm surge, wind-driven waves and tidal flooding which can be more destructive than cyclone wind. The majority of hurricanes and tropical storms form in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico during the official Atlantic hurricane season, which extends from June through November. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:4 Infectious Disease Public health threats are often defined by a biological agent/disease that may result in mass casualties or an outbreak of symptoms in those affected. Often emerging diseases are the greatest threat because they are new or varied iterations of existing threats and the population may not have built up a collective immunity to the disease. Landslide The movements of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope when the force of gravity pulling down the slope exceeds the strength of the earth materials that comprise to hold it in place. Slopes greater than 10 degrees are more likely to slide, as are slopes where the height from the top of the slope to its toe is greater than 40 feet. Slopes are also more likely to fail if vegetative cover is low and/or soil water content is high. Land Subsidence/Sinkhole The gradual settling or sudden sinking of the Earth’s surface due to the subsurface movement of earth materials. Causes of land subsidence include groundwater pumpage, aquifer system compaction, drainage of organic soils, underground mining, hydrocompaction, natural compaction, sinkholes, and thawing permafrost. Lightning Lightning is a discharge of electrical energy resulting from the buildup of positive and negative charges within a thunderstorm, creating a “bolt” when the buildup of charges becomes strong enough. This flash of light usually occurs within the clouds or between the clouds and the ground. A bolt of lightning can reach temperatures approaching 50,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Lightning rapidly heats the sky as it flashes, but the surrounding air cools following the bolt. This rapid heating and cooling of the surrounding air causes thunder. On average, 73 people are killed each year by lightning strikes in the United States. Nor’easter Similar to hurricanes, nor’easters are ocean storms capable of causing substantial damage to coastal areas in the Eastern United States due to their associated strong winds and heavy surf. Nor'easters are named for the winds that blow in from the northeast and drive the storm up the East Coast along the Gulf Stream, a band of warm water that lies off the Atlantic coast. They are caused by the interaction of the jet stream with horizontal temperature gradients and generally occur during the fall and winter months when moisture and cold air are plentiful. Nor’easters are known for dumping heavy amounts of rain and snow, producing hurricane-force winds, and creating high surf that causes severe beach erosion and coastal flooding. Severe Winter Storm Winter storms may include snow, sleet, freezing rain, or a mix of these wintry forms of precipitation. Blizzards, the most dangerous of all winter storms, combine low temperatures, heavy snowfall, and winds of at least 35 miles per hour, reducing visibility to only a few yards. Ice storms occur when moisture falls and freezes immediately upon impact on trees, power lines, communication towers, structures, roads and other hard surfaces. Winter storms and ice storms can down trees, cause widespread power outages, damage property, and cause fatalities and injuries to human life. Solar Flare/EMP According to NOAA, solar flares are large outbursts of electromagnetic radiation from the Sun lasting from minutes to hours. They are caused by magnetic reconnection associated with large-scale eruptions of magnetic flux called “coronal mass ejections” (CMEs). Solar flares occur in a large range of strengths and are classified on a logarithmic scale based on their intensity in the 1-minute averaged NOAA/GOES XRS instrument’s 0.1 -- 0.8 nm spectral band, with the smallest flares being labeled “A” flares, the next (10 times) larger called “B” flares, the next larger “C” flares, followed by the fairly large “M” flares, and finally the largest “X” flares. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:5 Storm Surge A storm surge is a large dome of water often 50 to 100 miles wide and rising anywhere from four to five feet in a Category 1 hurricane up to more than 30 feet in a Category 5 storm. Storm surge heights and associated waves are also dependent upon the shape of the offshore continental shelf (narrow or wide) and the depth of the ocean bottom (bathymetry). A narrow shelf, or one that drops steeply from the shoreline and subsequently produces deep water close to the shoreline, tends to produce a lower surge but higher and more powerful storm waves. Storm surge arrives ahead of a storm’s actual landfall and the more intense the hurricane is, the sooner the surge arrives. Storm surge can be devastating to coastal regions, causing severe beach erosion and property damage along the immediate coast. Further, water rise caused by storm surge can be very rapid, posing a serious threat to those who have not yet evacuated flood- prone areas. Tornado A tornado is a violently rotating column of air that has contact with the ground and is often visible as a funnel cloud. Its vortex rotates cyclonically with wind speeds ranging from as low as 40 mph to as high as 300 mph. Tornadoes are most often generated by thunderstorm activity when cool, dry air intersects and overrides a layer of warm, moist air forcing the warm air to rise rapidly. The destruction caused by tornadoes ranges from light to catastrophic depending on the intensity, size and duration of the storm. Tsunami A series of waves generated by an undersea disturbance such as an earthquake. The speed of a tsunami traveling away from its source can range from up to 500 miles per hour in deep water to approximately 20 to 30 miles per hour in shallower areas near coastlines. Tsunamis differ from regular ocean waves in that their currents travel from the water surface all the way down to the sea floor. Wave amplitudes in deep water are typically less than one meter; they are often barely detectable to the human eye. However, as they approach shore, they slow in shallower water, basically causing the waves from behind to effectively “pile up”, and wave heights to increase dramatically. As opposed to typical waves which crash at the shoreline, tsunamis bring with them a continuously flowing ‘wall of water’ with the potential to cause devastating damage in coastal areas located immediately along the shore. Volcano A mountain that opens downward to a reservoir of molten rock below the surface of the earth. While most mountains are created by forces pushing up the earth from below, volcanoes are different in that they are built up over time by an accumulation of their own eruptive products: lava, ash flows, and airborne ash and dust. Volcanoes erupt when pressure from gases and the molten rock beneath becomes strong enough to cause an explosion. Wildfire An uncontrolled fire burning in an area of vegetative fuels such as grasslands, brush, or woodlands. Heavier fuels with high continuity, steep slopes, high temperatures, low humidity, low rainfall, and high winds all work to increase risk for people and property located within wildfire hazard areas or along the urban/wildland interface. Wildfires are part of the natural management of forest ecosystems, but most are caused by human factors. Over 80 percent of forest fires are started by negligent human behavior such as smoking in wooded areas or improperly extinguishing campfires. The second most common cause for wildfire is lightning. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:6 Windstorm/Thunderstorm Windstorms/thunderstorms are caused by air masses of varying temperatures meeting in the atmosphere. Rapidly rising warm moist air fuels the formation of thunderstorms. Thunderstorms may occur singularly, in lines, or in clusters. They can move through an area very quickly or linger for several hours. Thunderstorms may result in hail, tornadoes, or straight-line winds. Windstorms pose a threat to lives, property, and vital utilities primarily due to the effects of flying debris and can down trees and power lines. TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE HAZARDS Chemical Hazard Hazardous material (HAZMAT) incidents can apply to fixed facilities as well as mobile, transportation-related accidents in the air, by rail, on the nation’s highways and on the water. HAZMAT incidents consist of solid, liquid and/or gaseous contaminants that are released from fixed or mobile containers, whether by accident or by design as with an intentional terrorist attack. A HAZMAT incident can last hours to days, while some chemicals can be corrosive or otherwise damaging over longer periods of time. In addition to the primary release, explosions and/or fires can result from a release, and contaminants can be extended beyond the initial area by persons, vehicles, water, wind and possibly wildlife as well. Cyberterrorism Cyberterrorism is a deliberate attack on an individual or group using the internet. In the past few decades, society has become dependent on computers and internet connections for much of daily life. This dependence has opened up the avenue for crime to be committed from afar, often from a different country. Some common examples of cyberterrorism include a hacker accessing bank accounts by hacking into a bank’s website, infecting a computer system with a virus, Trojan horse, or worm to inflict damage to the information in the system, or disseminating incorrect or otherwise flawed information, also called “misinformation.” Also, denial-of-service attacks could occur against prominent websites, which prevent legitimate users from accessing information or services Dam/ Levee Failure Dam failure is the collapse, breach, or other failure of a dam structure resulting in downstream flooding. In the event of a dam failure, the energy of the water stored behind even a small dam is capable of causing loss of life and severe property damage if development exists downstream of the dam. Dam failure can result from natural events, human-induced events, or a combination of the two. The most common cause of dam failure is prolonged rainfall that produces flooding. Failures due to other natural events such as hurricanes, earthquakes or landslides are significant because there is generally little or no advance warning. Nuclear Power Plant Incident A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency as “an event that has led to significant consequences to people, the environment or the facility. Often, this type of incident results from damage to the reactor core of a nuclear power plant which can release radioactivity into the environment. The degree of exposure from nuclear accidents has varied from serious to catastrophic. Terrorism Terrorism is defined by FEMA as, “the use of force or violence against persons or property in violation of the criminal laws of the United States for purposes of intimidation, coercion, or ransom.” Terrorist acts may include assassinations, kidnappings, hijackings, bomb scares and bombings, and the use of chemical, biological, nuclear and radiological weapons. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:7 Utility Failure Power/water utility failures often occur hand in hand with other hazards. For example, they can be caused by rising flood waters or high winds. These events most commonly occur when wind events knock down power lines or water treatment plants are flooded by rising waters, thereby shutting down these utilities. The impacts from these failures are often widespread and can affect thousands of people even when small parts of this infrastructure are affected. 4.3 DISASTER DECLARATIONS Disaster declarations provide initial insight into the hazards that may impact the Augusta-Richmond County planning area. Since 1953, 3 presidential disaster declarations have been reported in Augusta- Richmond County. This includes two events related to severe storms and flooding, as well as one severe winter storm event. TABLE 4.2: RICHMOND COUNTY DISASTER DECLARATIONS Year Disaster Number Description 1990 880 SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING 1998 1209 SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING 2014 4165 SEVERE WINTER STORM SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:8 4.4 HAZARD EVALUATION TABLE 4.3: DOCUMENTATION OF THE HAZARD EVALUATION PROCESS Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? NATURAL HAZARDS Avalanche NO Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of the NC State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of US Forest Service National Avalanche Center website The United States avalanche hazard is limited to mountainous western states including Alaska, as well as some areas of low risk in New England. Avalanche hazard was not included in the Georgia State Hazard Mitigation Plan after determining the mountain elevations in Georgia did not have enough snow to produce this hazard. Avalanche is not included in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. There is no risk of avalanche events in Georgia. Drought YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of the U.S. Drought Monitor data Drought is a normal part of virtually all climatic regimes, including areas with high and low average rainfall. Droughts are discussed in Georgia State Hazard Mitigation Plan. The Georgia State Hazard Mitigation Plan lists drought as a medium-high hazard for the state. Drought is included in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. There are reports of severe to exceptional drought conditions in 9 of the last 17 years in Augusta- Richmond County, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:9 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Earthquake YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of the National Geophysical Data Center USGS Earthquake Hazards Program website Although the zone of greatest seismic activity in the United States is along the Pacific Coast, eastern regions have experienced significant earthquakes. Earthquake events are discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan and the state is considered to be at low risk to an earthquake event. Earthquake was included in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. Earthquakes have occurred in and around the State of Georgia in the past. The state is affected by the Charleston and the Eastern Tennessee seismic zones, and the former has generated a magnitude 8.0 earthquake in the last 200 years. 24 events are known to have occurred in the county according to the National Geophysical Data Center. The greatest MMI reported was a VIII. According to USGS seismic hazard maps, the peak ground acceleration (PGA) with a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years for Augusta- Richmond County is approximately 8 to 14%g. FEMA recommends that earthquakes be further evaluated for mitigation purposes in areas with a PGA of 3%g or more. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:10 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Erosion NO Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Erosion is discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan but only for coastal areas (there is no significant discussion of riverine erosion). Erosion is not included as a hazard in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. Riverine erosion remains a natural, dynamic, and continuous process that unlikely to have a major impact on Augusta-Richmond County other than in a very localized sense. Expansive Soils NO Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of USGS Swelling Clays Map The effects of expansive soils are most prevalent in parts of the Southern, Central, and Western U.S. Expansive soils are not identified in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan. Augusta-Richmond County is located in an area that has relatively low clay swelling potential. The previous Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan did not identify expansive soils as a potential hazard. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:11 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Extreme Cold NO Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of the North Carolina State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Many areas of the United States are susceptible to extreme cold. Extreme cold was not included in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. As a community in the southeastern United States, the county is much more susceptible to extreme heat than extreme cold. Extreme Heat YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of the Georgia State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network Many areas of the United States are susceptible to extreme heat and heat waves, including Georgia. The GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan reports the entire state has some vulnerability. Extreme heat was included in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. Although NCDC reports no extreme heat events for Augusta-Richmond County, several nearby weather stations have reported temperatures in the upper 90s and low 100s every year for the past 10 years. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:12 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Flooding YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Review of historical disaster declarations Review of FEMA DFIRM data Review of FEMA’s NFIP Community Status Book and Community Rating System (CRS) Floods occur in all 50 states and in the U.S. territories. The flood hazard is thoroughly discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan. The state was found to have high vulnerability to flooding. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan addresses flood hazard. NCDC reports that Augusta- Richmond County has been affected by 24 flood events since 1996. In total, these events caused nearly $1 million (2016 dollars) in property damages. Two of the county’s Presidential Disaster Declarations were flood- related. 18.7% of Augusta-Richmond County is located in an identified floodplain (100- or 500-year). All jurisdictions in the county participate in the NFIP and Augusta- Richmond County also participates in the CRS. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:13 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Hail YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Although hailstorms occur primarily in the Midwestern states, they do occur in every state on the mainland U.S. Most inland regions experience hailstorms at least two or more days each year. Hailstorm events are discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan under the Severe Weather hazard. Hail is included in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. NCDC reports 72 hailstorm events (0.75 to 1.75 inch size hail) for Augusta-Richmond County since 1955. Hurricane and Tropical Storm YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Analysis of NOAA historical tropical cyclone tracks and National Hurricane Center Website FEMA Hazus-MH storm return periods The Atlantic and Gulf regions are most prone to landfall by hurricanes and tropical storms. Hurricane and tropical storm events are discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan and are listed as the medium hazard in the state. Hurricanes and tropical weather were addressed in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. NOAA historical records indicate 74 storm tracks have come within 75 miles of Augusta-Richmond County since 1850. The 50-year return period peak gust for hurricane and tropical storm events in Augusta-Richmond County is around 68 mph. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:14 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Infectious Disease YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Discussions with local officials The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan did not include infectious disease; however, it is a hazard that local officials were concerned with and wanted to evaluate. Public health emergencies are often unpredictable and can ramp up quickly depending on how quickly they are recognized. These threats will potentially impact the county in the future. Landslide NO Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of USGS Landslide Incidence and Susceptibility Hazard Map Landslides occur in every state in the U.S, and they are most common in the coastal ranges of California, the Colorado Plateau, the Rocky Mountains, and the Appalachian Mountains. Landslide/debris flow events are discussed in the GA state plan, but vulnerability tends to be higher in the Appalachian region of the state. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan did not address landslides. USGS landslide hazard maps indicate that a low risk is found through most of the county. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:15 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Land Subsidence/Sinkhole NO Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Land subsidence affects at least 45 states, including Georgia. However, because of the broad range of causes and impacts, there has been limited national focus on this hazard. The state plan delineates certain areas that are susceptible to land subsidence hazards in Georgia; with the southern part of the state being much more susceptible. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan did not identify land subsidence as a potential hazard. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:16 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Lightning YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Review of Vaisala’s NLDN Lightning Flash Density Map Lightning events were not addressed on their own in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan, but the planning team determined that it might be useful to separate lightning out as a hazard in this update. NCDC reports only 1 lightning event in Augusta-Richmond County since 1996, but it resulted in 3 injuries. The central region of the Florida has the highest density of lightning strikes in the mainland U.S.; however, lightning events are experienced in nearly every region. Lightning events are discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan as part of the severe weather hazard. According to Vaisala’s U.S. National Lightning Detection Network, Augusta-Richmond County is located in an area that experienced an average of 2 to 8 lightning flashes per square kilometer per year between 2006 and 2014. Nor’easter NO Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Nor’easters are not discussed in the state plan. Nor’easters were not identified in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. NCDC does not report any nor’easter activity for Augusta- Richmond County. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:17 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Severe Winter Storm YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Review of historical presidential disaster declarations Winter storms affect every state in the continental U.S. and Alaska. Severe winter storms, including snow storms and ice storms, are discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan. They are listed as a medium-high hazard in the state. Winter snow and ice storm events were addressed in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. NCDC reports that Augusta- Richmond County has been affected by at least 8 snow and ice events since 1996. One of the county’s disaster declarations was directly related to winter storm events. Solar Flare/EMP YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of the NOAA Space Weather scales Discussions with local officials The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan did not include solar flares; however, it was discussed as a potential threat at meetings of the HMPT. Solar flares are a threat that can occur without regard to specific location, so it was evaluated in this plan. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:18 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Storm Surge NO Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Given the inland location of Augusta-Richmond County, storm surge would not affect the area. Storm surge is discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan, but vulnerability to storm surge is confined coastal areas. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan did not address storm surge. No historical events were reported by NCDC. Tornado YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of G State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database Tornado events are discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan and ranked as a high risk hazard in the state. Tornado events were addressed in the previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. NCDC reports 10 tornado events in Augusta-Richmond County since 1950. These events have resulted 26 injuries and $16.4 million (2016 dollars) in property damage with the most severe being an EF3. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:19 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Tsunami NO Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of FEMA “How-to” mitigation planning guidance (Publication 386-2, “Understanding Your Risks – Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses). No record exists of a catastrophic Atlantic basin tsunami impacting the Atlantic coast of the United States. Tsunami inundation zone maps are not available for communities located along the U.S. East Coast. Tsunamis are not discussed in the state plan. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan did not address tsunamis. FEMA mitigation planning guidance suggests that locations along the U.S. East Coast have a relatively low tsunami risk and need not conduct a tsunami risk assessment at this time. Volcano NO Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of USGS Volcano Hazards Program website More than 65 potentially active volcanoes exist in the United States and most are located in Alaska. The Western states and Hawaii are also potentially affected by volcanic hazards. There are no active volcanoes in Georgia. There has not been a volcanic eruption in Georgia in over 1 million years. No volcanoes are located near Augusta-Richmond County. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:20 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Wildfire YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment (SWRA) Data Review of GA Forestry Commission data Wildfires occur in virtually all parts of the United States. Wildfire hazard risks will increase as low- density development along the urban/wildland interface increases. Wildfires are discussed in the state plan as a medium hazard of concern in the state. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan addressed wildfire. A review of SWRA data indicates that there are some areas of elevated concern in Augusta- Richmond County. According to the Georgia Forestry Commission, Augusta-Richmond County experiences an average of 38 fires each year which burn a combined 129 acres. Windstorm/Thunderstorm YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of NOAA NCDC Storm Events Database The GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan addresses windstorms and thunderstorms as severe weather which is considered a high to very high risk hazard in the state. Severe thunderstorm events were addressed in the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan. NCDC reports 182 thunderstorm/high wind events in Augusta-Richmond County since 1950. These events have resulted in 1 death, 36 injuries, and $4.0 million (2016 dollars) in property damage. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:21 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE HAZARDS Chemical Hazard YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Review of USDOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) incident database Cities, counties, and towns where hazardous materials fabrication, processing, and storage sites are located, and those where hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facilities operate are at risk for hazardous materials events. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan included hazardous materials incidents. 29 TRI facilities are located in Augusta-Richmond County. 21 of the 339 PHMSA-reported HAZMAT incidents in the county were classified as “serious” incidents. In total, these incidents have resulted in 27 injuries, and over $700,000 (2016 dollars) in property damages. Cyberterrorism YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Discussions with local officials The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan did not include cyberterrorism; however, it was discussed as a possible threat in planning team meetings. Cyberterrorism is a threat that can occur without regard to specific location, so it was evaluated in this plan. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:22 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Dam/Levee Failure YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Review of Georgia Safe Dams Program data The National Inventory of Dams shows dams are located in every state. Dam failure is discussed in the GA State Hazard Mitigation Plan and is listed a low risk hazard for the state. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan addressed dam failure. Of the 27 dams reported by the Georgia Safe Dams Program, 6 are high hazard (high hazard is defined as “where failure or mis-operation will probably cause loss of human life”). Nuclear Power Plant Incident YES Review of IAEA data on the location of nuclear reactors Review of the Augusta-Richmond County HIRA Discussions with local officials The Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant is located within 10 miles of the southeastern corner of Augusta- Richmond County. The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan included nuclear power plant incident as a hazard. A nuclear accident is unlikely to occur, but could cause severe damage in the event of a major incident. Terrorism YES Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Discussions with local officials The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan included terrorism. There are several high profiles targets in the area that caused the planning team to determine that the hazard should be evaluated further. SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 4:23 Natural Hazards Considered Was this hazard identified as a significant hazard to be addressed in the plan at this time? (Yes or No) How was this determination made? Why was this determination made? Utility Failure YES Review of FEMA’s Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Review of the previous Augusta- Richmond County hazard mitigation plan Discussions with local officials The previous Augusta-Richmond County hazard mitigation plan did not include utility failure; however, discussion during planning team meetings indicated the hazard warranted further discussion. Utility failures occur frequently in the county, especially during winter storms or high wind events. These will continue to impact the county going forward. 4.5 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION RESULTS TABLE 4.4: SUMMARY RESULTS OF THE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION PROCESS NATURAL HAZARDS Severe Winter Storm Avalanche Solar Flare/EMP Drought Storm Surge Earthquake Tornado Erosion Tsunami Expansive Soils Volcano Extreme Cold Wildfire Extreme Heat Windstorm/Thunderstorm Flooding TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE HAZARDS Hail Chemical Hazard Hurricane/Tropical Storm Cyberterrorism Infectious Disease Dam/Levee Failure Landslide Nuclear Power Plant Incident Land Subsidence/Sinkhole Terrorism Lightning Utility Failure Nor’easter = Hazard considered significant enough for further evaluation in the Augusta-Richmond County hazard risk assessment. SSEECCTTIIOONN 55 HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:1 This section includes detailed hazard profiles for each of the hazards identified in the previous section (Hazard Identification) as significant enough for further evaluation in the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan. It contains the following subsections: Overview 5.1 Overview 5.2 Study Area 5.3 Climate Change/Adaptation Natural Hazards 5.4 Drought 5.5 Earthquake 5.6 Extreme Heat 5.7 Flooding 5.8 Hail 5.9 Hurricane/Tropical Storm 5.10 Infectious Disease 5.11 Lightning 5.12 Severe Winter Storm 5.13 Solar Flare/EMP 5.14 Tornado 5.15 Wildfire 5.16 Windstorm/Thunderstorm Technological/Man-Made Hazards 5.17 Chemical Hazard 5.18 Cyberterrorism 5.19 Dam/Levee Failure 5.20 Nuclear Power Plant Incident 5.21 Terrorism 5.22 Utility Failure Conclusion 5.23 Conclusions on Hazard Risk 5.24 Final Determinations 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(2)(i): The risk assessment shall include a description of the type, location and extent of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events Overview 5.1 OVERVIEW This section includes detailed hazard profiles for each of the hazards identified in the previous section (Hazard Identification) as significant enough for further evaluation in Augusta-Richmond County hazard risk assessment by creating a hazard profile. Each hazard profile includes a general description of the hazard, its location and extent, notable historical occurrences, and the probability of future occurrences. Each profile also includes specific items noted by members of the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team as it relates to unique historical or anecdotal hazard information for Augusta- Richmond County or a participating municipality within it. The following hazards were identified: SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:2 Natural Drought Earthquake Extreme Heat Flooding Hail Hurricane/Tropical Storm Infectious Disease Lightning Severe Winter Storm Solar Flare/EMP Tornado Windstorm/Thunderstorm Wildfire Technological/Man-Made Chemical Hazard Cyberterrorism Dam/Levee Failure Nuclear Power Plant Incident Terrorism Utility Failure 5.2 STUDY AREA Richmond County includes 3 municipalities: Augusta, Blythe, and Hephzibah. The City of Augusta operates in conjunction with Richmond County as part of a consolidated government and thus, these communities are treated as a single entity in this plan as there are no unincorporated areas within the county. Additionally, Fort Gordon occupies a large section of the southwest part of the county and, although it is not an incorporated municipality, it is treated as a separate entity for the purposes of this plan. Table 5.1 provides a summary table of the participating communities. In addition, Figure 5.1 provides a base map, for reference, of Augusta-Richmond County. TABLE 5.1: JURISDICTIONAL AREAS IN THE AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Fort Gordon Blythe Hephzibah SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:3 FIGURE 5.1: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY BASE MAP Table 5.2 lists each significant hazard for Augusta-Richmond County and identifies whether or not it has been determined to be a specific hazard of concern for the 3 communities and the Fort Gordon area. This is the based on the best available data and information from the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team. (● = hazard of concern) TABLE 5.2 SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED HAZARD EVENTS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Jurisdiction NATURAL Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / Tr o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r St o r m Sol a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi n d s t o r m / Th u n d e r s t o r m Wi l d f i r e Augusta-Richmond County Augusta-Richmond County ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Blythe ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Fort Gordon ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Hephzibah ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:4 TABLE 5.2 SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED HAZARD EVENTS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY (CONTINUED) Jurisdiction TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Ch e m i c a l H a z a r d Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Da m / L e v e e Fa i l u r e Nu c l e a r P o w e r Pl a n t I n c i d e n t Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e Augusta-Richmond County Augusta-Richmond County ● ● ● ● ● ● Blythe ● ● ● ● ● ● Fort Gordon ● ● ● ● ● ● Hephzibah ● ● ● ● ● ● 5.3 CLIMATE CHANGE/ADAPTATION The National Climate Assessment (2014) is a report on climate change in the United States that has been developed to increase understanding of the impacts of climate change throughout the country, with specific focus on regional effects and outcomes. The report is based on a wealth of information and data analysis, evaluating both past trends and future projections related to changes in our climate.1 Much of the data indicates that the primary factor in altering the global climate is greenhouse gas emissions from human activities. Augusta-Richmond County appears to be fundamentally changing due to climate change which has resulted in more violent storms, higher temperatures, and changes in precipitation leading to increased drought and/or flood risk. These changes are expected to continue in the foreseeable future for both the county and the region at-large. Primary public health concerns as a result of climate change impacts in the Southeast include a number of potential impacts such as the urban heat island effect upon city residents and outdoor workers, heat-related issues for rural workers (primarily farmworkers), increased health risks to the elderly and other vulnerable populations in both rural and urban communities, and impacts to local ecosystems that can have widespread effects on human health. Due to its inland location, the impacts of climate change on Augusta-Richmond County may less dramatically alter lifestyles and the environment from today’s “normal” when compared to other areas of the nation and world. Nevertheless there will be fundamental changes to the communities covered by this plan and the impacts of climate change on the hazards discussed in this plan will be significant. Climate change is likely to exacerbate the effects of many hazards and this is discussed (where applicable) in the hazard profiles found in this section. 1 http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/ SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:5 Natural Hazards 5.4 DROUGHT 5.4.1 Background Drought is a normal part of virtually all climatic regions, including areas with high and low average rainfall. Drought is the consequence of a natural reduction in the amount of precipitation expected over an extended period of time, usually a season or more in length. High temperatures, high winds, and low humidity can exacerbate drought conditions. In addition, human actions and demands for water resources can hasten drought-related impacts. Drought may also lead to more severe wildfires. Droughts are typically classified into one of four types: 1) meteorological, 2) hydrologic, 3) agricultural, or 4) socioeconomic. Table 5.3 presents definitions for these types of drought. TABLE 5.3 DROUGHT CLASSIFICATION DEFINITIONS Meteorological Drought The degree of dryness or departure of actual precipitation from an expected average or normal amount based on monthly, seasonal, or annual time scales. Hydrologic Drought The effects of precipitation shortfalls on stream flows and reservoir, lake, and groundwater levels. Agricultural Drought Soil moisture deficiencies relative to water demands of plant life, usually crops. Socioeconomic Drought The effect of demands for water exceeding the supply as a result of a weather-related supply shortfall. Source: Multi-Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment: A Cornerstone of the National Mitigation Strategy, FEMA Droughts are slow-onset hazards, but over time, can have very damaging effects on crops, municipal water supplies, recreational uses, and wildlife. If drought conditions extend over a number of years, the direct and indirect economic impact can be significant. The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) is based on observed drought conditions and range from -0.5 (incipient dry spell) to -4.0 (extreme drought). Evident in Figure 5.2, the Palmer Drought Severity Index Summary Map for the United States, drought affects most areas of the United States, but tends to be less severe in the Eastern United States. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:6 FIGURE 5.2: PALMER DROUGHT SEVERITY INDEX SUMMARY MAP FOR THE UNITED STATES Source: National Drought Mitigation Center 5.4.2 Location and Spatial Extent Drought typically covers a large area and cannot be confined to any geographic or political boundaries. According to the Palmer Drought Severity Index, Central Eastern Georgia has a relatively low risk for drought hazard, spending between 5.00% and 9.99% of the time in severe to extreme drought conditions over the last 100 years. However, local areas may experience much more severe and/or frequent drought events than what is represented on the Palmer Drought Severity Index map. It is assumed that Augusta-Richmond County would be uniformly exposed to drought, making the spatial extent potentially widespread. It is also notable that drought conditions typically do not cause significant damage to the built environment. 5.4.3 Historical Occurrences The United States Drought Monitor was used to ascertain historical drought events in Augusta- Richmond County. The U.S. Drought Monitor records information on historical drought occurrence and categorizes drought on a D0-D4 scale. Table 5.4 presents definitions for these classifications. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:7 TABLE 5.4 U.S. DROUGHT MONITOR DROUGHT CLASSIFICATIONS According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, Augusta-Richmond County experienced severe to exceptional drought occurrences in 9 of the last 17 years (2000-2016). Table 5.5 shows the most severe drought condition reported for each year in Augusta-Richmond County, according to U.S. Drought Monitor classifications. TABLE 5.5: HISTORICAL DROUGHT OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Year Severity 2000 EXCEPTIONAL 2001 EXTREME 2002 EXCEPTIONAL 2003 ABNORMAL 2004 SEVERE 2005 ABNORMAL 2006 MODERATE 2007 EXCEPTIONAL 2008 EXTREME 2009 MODERATE 2010 MODERATE 2011 EXTREME 2012 EXCEPTIONAL 2013 EXTREME 2014 MODERATE 2015 MODERATE 2016 ABNORMAL Source: U.S. Drought Monitor In addition, local officials have identified several drought events of note that have affected Augusta- Richmond County over the past 30 years. The most severe of these was in 1986 when a drought contributed to 3 deaths in the county and over $300,000 in crop damage. In 1998, a drought caused a reduction in normal flows of the Savannah River so much that tourism was reduced and water quality was negatively impacted. Finally, in 2003, a major drought occurred in the region that was a -4.0 on the Palmer Drought Severity Index. D0 Abnormally Dry Going into drought: short-term dryness slowing planting, growth of crops or pastures. Coming out of drought: some lingering water deficits; pastures or crops not fully recovered D1 Moderate Drought Some damage to crops, pastures; streams, reservoirs, or wells low, some water shortages developing or imminent; voluntary water-use restrictions requested D2 Severe Drought Crop or pasture losses likely; water shortages common; water restrictions imposed D3 Extreme Drought Major crop/pasture losses; widespread water shortages or restrictions D4 Exceptional Drought Exceptional and widespread crop/pasture losses; shortages of water in reservoirs, streams, and wells creating water emergencies Source: United States Drought Monitor, http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/classify.htm SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:8 Data from the State of Georgia’s Climatologist was also reviewed to obtain additional information on historical drought events that may have been larger in scale or more regional in nature. These events are identified in Table 5.6. TABLE 5.6: NOTABLE HISTORICAL DROUGHT OCCURRENCES IN THE STATE OF GEORGIA Year Area Affected Notes 1903-1905 Statewide Severe 1924-1927 North Central Georgia One of most severe of century 1930-1935 Mostly Statewide Affected most of US 1938-1944 Statewide Regional drought 1950-1957 Statewide Regional drought 1968-1971 Southern and Central Georgia Variable severity 1985-1990 North and Central Georgia Regional drought 1999-2009 Statewide Severe Source: USGS, GA State Climatologist It should also be noted that climate change will likely have a significant impact on the frequency and intensity of drought events across the United States. Indeed, short-term droughts are expected to intensify throughout the United States and long term drought will likely become much more prevalent in the western United States. As can be seen in Figure 5.3 much of the southern United States can expect a substantial increase in the number of months that will be spent in drought conditions when compared to the 20th century baseline. Although the southwest is expected to see a much larger increase in the number of months in drought conditions, most of Georgia (including Augusta-Richmond County) can expect an average increase of between 11 and 17 months in drought conditions over a 30 year period going forward. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:9 FIGURE 5.3: MEAN OF DIFFERENCES IN NUMBER OF DROUGHT MONTHS RELATIVE TO 20TH CENTURY BASELINE Source: Strzepek et al., 2010 5.4.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Based on historical occurrence information, it is assumed that all of Augusta-Richmond County has a probability level of highly likely (near 100 percent annual probability) for future drought events. This is especially true given the potential effects of climate change to exacerbate drought and increase the frequency of drought events going forward, which will ultimately result in greater agricultural losses and more water supply shortages in the county. 5.4.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Drought can have a detrimental effect on the livelihood of farmers and agricultural producers in Augusta-Richmond County. Efforts to mitigate against drought, such as using irrigation equipment, have a high initial cost, including the need for an increase in management requirements, cost of operation and maintenance, and the lack of good quality water resources—which during times of drought would be severely affected. Public confidence would likely not be impacted severely. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:10 Responders Although drought would have many of the same impacts on responders as it would on the public, the overall effects on responders would be relatively limited when compared to other hazards. Continuity of Operations Drought would have minimal impacts on continuity of operations due to the relatively long warning time that would allow for plans to be made to maintain continuity of operations. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Water Use Drought has the potential to affect Augusta-Richmond County’s water supply for residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, and government-owned areas. Drought can reduce water supply in wells and reservoirs. When drought conditions persist with no relief, local or state governments often institute water restrictions which can impact many aspects of the built environment. Irrigation Drought would affect irrigation and outdoor landscaping efforts around residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, and government-owned land. Water conservation strategies can limit the amount of water used to maintain the aesthetic environment around buildings, businesses, and areas such as golf courses (perhaps most prominently, Augusta National Golf Club). This would include automatic and non-automatic spray irrigation systems, hose-end sprinklers, handheld hoses, bucket watering, drip irrigation, athletic field irrigation, swimming pools, car washing, pressure washing, and reuse water. Economy Extreme drought has the potential to depress local businesses and industries such as landscaping, recreation and tourism, and public utilities. Nursery and landscape businesses can also face significant losses from a drought. Losses include reduction of output and sales of nursery crops, reduction in plant sales, and an increase in watering costs. This can lead to the closing of many business locations, lay-off of employees, and increases in bankruptcy filing. In Augusta-Richmond County, events at Augusta National Golf Club are recognized nationwide and contribute substantially to the economy. Irrigating golf courses of this caliber is critical in order to maintain the course at an acceptable level to play. In a drought scenario, it is possible that reduced availability of water resources may hinder the ability of course managers to maintain the course to the proper level, thereby having a negative impact on the course, future events, and thus, the economy at- large. Environment Agriculture The agriculture sector of Augusta-Richmond County is particularly susceptible to drought damage. Table 5.7 shows the number of farms, acres of total land area being farmed, and average farm size for the county.2 Agricultural drought has the potential to directly affect much of the land in the county. Agricultural areas at particular risk are cropland and pastures. 2 Augusta-Richmond County: Census of agriculture—2012. Retrieved January 3, 2017, from https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resources/County_Profiles/Georgia/cp13245.pdf SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:11 TABLE 5.7: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY FARMLAND OVERVIEW Census of Agriculture Number of Farms 123 Total Land in Farms, Acres 13,908 Average Farm Size, Acres 113 Source: Census of Agriculture, 2012 Crops Prolonged periods of dry weather are the most difficult and damaging problem faced by crop growers and agricultural suppliers. Short- or long-term moisture deficits—even with the use of irrigation methods—during critical stages of crop development can severely reduce yields, with the amount of yield lost depending on when the drought occurs (see Table 5.8 for a list of Richmond County crop specific information), the growth stage of the crop, the severity of dry conditions, and the amount of available water that the soil can hold. TABLE 5.8: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY CROP INFORMATION Crops Acres Harvested Rank3 Forage-land used for all hay and haylage, grass silage, and greenchop 1,768 113 Wheat for grain, all 144 103 Winter wheat for grain 144 103 Pecans, all 77 82 Rye for grain 65 65 Source: Census of Agriculture, 2012 Livestock Table 5.9 shows the type of livestock in Richmond County, including the quantity of livestock and the county’s rank compared to other counties in the state. These are at risk for being affected by drought conditions in the county. Livestock losses from drought will most likely be confined to forage-based production systems. Losses in beef and dairy systems will potentially be of a single-season or multiyear variety. Single-season losses will include lost forage production (on both hay and grazing land), reduced weaning weights, reduced milk production, and increased mortality. Multiyear losses could include the cost of reestablishing pastures and reduced meat or milk production in subsequent years due to forced sales in the drought year. In addition, drought conditions could result in poor pasture conditions, reduced drinking water supplies, and a critical hay shortage that directly affects livestock and poultry health. TABLE 5.9: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY LIVESTOCK (2012) Livestock Number Rank4 Cattle and calves 1,854 122 Layers 477 101 3 Rank in production among Georgia counties 4 Rank in production among Georgia counties SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:12 Livestock Number Rank4 Horses and ponies 307 79 Pullets for laying flock replacement 220 57 Goats, all 111 133 Source: Census of Agriculture, 2012 Environmental Degradation Drought may also lead to pollution of water sources as a result of lack of rain water to dilute industrial and agricultural chemical runoff. This poses a risk to plants and animals and makes it difficult to maintain a clean drinking water supply. Lack of water reaching the soil may also cause the ground to become dry and unstable. Erosion can increase and loss of topsoil can be severe if a high-intensity rain falls on ground lacking a ground cover of plants. As a result of these environmental impacts, habitats may be degraded through a loss of wetlands, lake capacity, and vegetation. 5.5 EARTHQUAKE 5.5.1 Background An earthquake is movement or trembling of the ground produced by sudden displacement of rock in the Earth's crust. Earthquakes result from crustal strain, volcanism, landslides, or the collapse of caverns. Earthquakes can affect hundreds of thousands of square miles, cause damage to property measured in the tens of billions of dollars, result in loss of life and injury to hundreds of thousands of persons, and disrupt the social and economic functioning of the affected area. Most property damage and earthquake-related deaths are caused by the failure and collapse of structures due to ground shaking. The level of damage depends upon the amplitude and duration of the shaking, which are directly related to the earthquake size, distance from the fault, site, and regional geology. Other damaging earthquake effects include landslides, the down-slope movement of soil and rock (mountain regions and along hillsides), and liquefaction, in which ground soil loses the ability to resist shear and flows much like quick sand. In the case of liquefaction, anything relying on the substrata for support can shift, tilt, rupture, or collapse. Most earthquakes are caused by the release of stresses accumulated as a result of the rupture of rocks along opposing fault planes in the Earth’s outer crust. These fault planes are typically found along borders of the Earth's 10 tectonic plates. The areas of greatest tectonic instability occur at the perimeters of the slowly moving plates, as these locations are subjected to the greatest strains from plates traveling in opposite directions and at different speeds. Deformation along plate boundaries causes strain in the rock and the consequent buildup of stored energy. When the built-up stress exceeds the rocks' strength a rupture occurs. The rock on both sides of the fracture is snapped, releasing the stored energy and producing seismic waves, generating an earthquake. The greatest earthquake threat in the United States is along tectonic plate boundaries and seismic fault lines located in the central and western states; however, the Eastern United States does face moderate risk to less frequent, less intense earthquake events. Figure 5.4 shows relative seismic risk in the United SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:13 States based on United States Geological Survey mapping of peak ground acceleration at the national level. FIGURE 5.4: PEAK ACCELERATION WITH 10 PERCENT PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS Source: United States Geological Survey, 2014 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:14 Earthquakes are measured in terms of their magnitude and intensity. Magnitude is measured using the Richter Scale, an open-ended logarithmic scale that describes the energy release of an earthquake through a measure of shock wave amplitude (Table 5.10). Each unit increase in magnitude on the Richter Scale corresponds to a 10-fold increase in wave amplitude, or a 32-fold increase in energy. Intensity is most commonly measured using the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale based on direct and indirect measurements of seismic effects. The scale levels are typically described using roman numerals, ranging from “I” corresponding to imperceptible (instrumental) events to “XII” for catastrophic (total destruction). A detailed description of the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of earthquake intensity and its correspondence to the Richter Scale is given in Table 5.11. TABLE 5.10: RICHTER SCALE RICHTER MAGNITUDES EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS < 3.5 Generally not felt, but recorded. 3.5 - 5.4 Often felt, but rarely causes damage. 5.4 - 6.0 At most slight damage to well-designed buildings. Can cause major damage to poorly constructed buildings over small regions. 6.1 - 6.9 Can be destructive in areas up to about 100 kilometers across where people live. 7.0 - 7.9 Major earthquake. Can cause serious damage over larger areas. 8 or > Great earthquake. Can cause serious damage in areas several hundred kilometers across. Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency TABLE 5.11: MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY SCALE FOR EARTHQUAKES SCALE INTENSITY DESCRIPTION OF EFFECTS CORRESPONDING RICHTER SCALE MAGNITUDE I INSTRUMENTAL Detected only on seismographs. II FEEBLE Some people feel it. < 4.2 III SLIGHT Felt by people resting; like a truck rumbling by. IV MODERATE Felt by people walking. V SLIGHTLY STRONG Sleepers awake; church bells ring. < 4.8 VI STRONG Trees sway; suspended objects swing, objects fall off shelves. < 5.4 VII VERY STRONG Mild alarm; walls crack; plaster falls. < 6.1 VIII DESTRUCTIVE Moving cars uncontrollable; masonry fractures, poorly constructed buildings damaged. IX RUINOUS Some houses collapse; ground cracks; pipes break open. < 6.9 X DISASTROUS Ground cracks profusely; many buildings destroyed; liquefaction and landslides widespread. < 7.3 XI VERY DISASTROUS Most buildings and bridges collapse; roads, railways, pipes and cables destroyed; general triggering of other hazards. < 8.1 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:15 SCALE INTENSITY DESCRIPTION OF EFFECTS CORRESPONDING RICHTER SCALE MAGNITUDE XII CATASTROPHIC Total destruction; trees fall; ground rises and falls in waves. > 8.1 Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency 5.5.2 Location and Spatial Extent The eastern and northern parts of Georgia are subject to the most significant earthquake risk in the state, with the western and southeast region most vulnerable to a very damaging earthquake. The state is affected by both the Charleston Fault in South Carolina and the Eastern Tennessee Fault in Tennessee. The Charleston Fault has generated earthquakes measuring greater than 8 on the Richter Scale during the last 200 years, and this is the fault that is most likely to impact Augusta-Richmond County. Figure 5.5 shows the intensity level associated with Augusta-Richmond County, based on the national USGS map of peak acceleration with 2 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years. This is the probability that ground motion will reach a certain level during an earthquake. The data show peak horizontal ground acceleration (the fastest measured change in speed, for a particle at ground level that is moving horizontally due to an earthquake) with a 2 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years. The map was compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Geologic Hazards Team, which conducts global investigations of earthquake, geomagnetic, and landslide hazards. According to this map, Augusta- Richmond County lies within an approximate zone of 10 to 20%g peak ground acceleration. This indicates that the county as a whole exists within an area of moderate seismic risk. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:16 FIGURE 5.5: UNITED STATES EARTHQUAKE HAZARD MAP Source: United States Geological Survey, 2014 5.5.3 Historical Occurrences At least twenty-four earthquakes are known to have affected Augusta-Richmond County since 1800. The strongest of these measured a VIII on the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale. Table 5.12 provides a summary of earthquake events reported by the National Geophysical Data Center between 1638 and 1985 and Figure 5.6 presents a map showing earthquakes whose epicenters have occurred near the county between 1985 and 2015 (no earthquakes occurred within the county boundaries during this period). Table 5.13 shows a detailed occurrence of each event including the date, distance from the epicenter, magnitude, and Modified Mercalli Intensity (if known).5 TABLE 5.12: SUMMARY OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Occurrences Greatest MMI Reported Description of Greatest MMI Impacts Augusta-Richmond County 21 VIII Moving cars uncontrollable; masonry fractures, poorly constructed buildings damaged Blythe 0 -- -- 5 Due to reporting mechanisms, not all earthquakes events were recorded during this time. Furthermore, some are missing data, such as the epicenter location, due to a lack of widely used technology. In these instances, a value of “unknown” is reported. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:17 Location Number of Occurrences Greatest MMI Reported Description of Greatest MMI Impacts Fort Gordon 3 VI Trees sway; suspended objects swing, objects fall off shelves Hephzibah 0 -- -- AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 24 VIII -- Source: National Geophysical Data Center FIGURE 5.6: HISTORIC EARTHQUAKES WITH EPICENTERS NEAR AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY (1985-2015) Source: United States Geological Survey, 2016 TABLE 5.13: SIGNIFICANT SEISMIC EVENTS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY (1638-1985) Location Date Epicentral Distance (km) Magnitude MMI Augusta-Richmond County Augusta-Richmond County 2/7/1812 777 7.4 5 Augusta-Richmond County 1/5/1843 762 Not Available 4 Augusta-Richmond County 11/2/1875 61 Not Available 6 Augusta-Richmond County 9/1/1886 193 Not Available 8 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:18 Location Date Epicentral Distance (km) Magnitude MMI Augusta-Richmond County 10/22/1886 193 Not Available 6 Augusta-Richmond County 1/24/1903 Not Available Not Available 3 Augusta-Richmond County 4/19/1907 193 Not Available 5 Augusta-Richmond County 9/22/1914 171 Not Available 2 Augusta-Richmond County 2/21/1916 231 Not Available 4 Augusta-Richmond County 10/18/1916 393 Not Available 2 Augusta-Richmond County 10/20/1924 179 Not Available 2 Augusta-Richmond County 7/29/1943 Not Available Not Available 3 Augusta-Richmond County 7/26/1945 122 5.6 3 Augusta-Richmond County 8/3/1959 234 Not Available 5 Augusta-Richmond County 3/12/1960 280 Not Available 4 Augusta-Richmond County 11/9/1968 775 5.3 4 Augusta-Richmond County 11/20/1969 445 4.3 4 Augusta-Richmond County 5/19/1971 127 3.4 4 Augusta-Richmond County 2/3/1972 144 4.5 5 Augusta-Richmond County 8/2/1974 66 4.9 4 Augusta-Richmond County 11/6/1983 181 3.3 2 Blythe None Reported -- -- -- -- Fort Gordon None Reported -- -- -- -- Hephzibah Hephzibah 9/1/1886 200 Not Available 6 Hephzibah 2/3/1972 159 4.5 4 Hephzibah 8/2/1974 71 4.9 3 Source: National Geophysical Data Center 5.5.4 Probability of Future Occurrences The probability of significant, damaging earthquake events affecting Augusta-Richmond County is likely as indicated by Figure 5.7 which shows the forecasted frequency of an earthquake that would result in shaking capable of causing damage. It is possible that future earthquakes resulting in moderate to strong perceived shaking and damages that are substantial will affect the county. The annual probability level for the county is estimated between 10 and 100 percent (likely). SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:19 FIGURE 5.7: FORECASTED FREQUENCY OF EARTHQUAKE SHAKING CAPABLE OF CAUSING DAMAGE WITHIN THE UNITED STATES Source: National Geophysical Data Center 5.5.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Earthquakes in Augusta-Richmond County generally are not high impact events that cause injury or death as most are moderate. The public typically experiences some shaking in these events and the greatest threat to health and well-being is often from objects falling from shelves. Public confidence would likely not be affected drastically in the event of an earthquake. Responders There would be little impact on responders in the event of an earthquake, again, because Augusta- Richmond County is only likely to experience a moderate earthquake magnitude. Since there would be likely only minor damage to infrastructure, responders would likely not be impacted in their ability to respond to an earthquake. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:20 Continuity of Operations During and after an earthquake, continuity of operations could relatively easily be maintained and there would likely be little disruption to services or operations. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Ground shaking is the primary cause of damage to the built environment during an earthquake. There are three important variables that determine the amount of damage: the intensity of the quake, local soil characteristics, and the quality of the impacted structures. The amount of damage caused by an earthquake is strongly influenced by soil characteristics. The velocity at which the rock or soil transmits shear waves is the main contributor to ground shaking. Shaking is increased by soft, thick, or wet soil types. Certain building types are particularly vulnerable to earthquake damage: wood-frame multi-unit buildings, single-family homes, mobile homes, and unreinforced masonry buildings.6 The most susceptible structures are wood-frame, multi-story, mixed-use buildings that have large openings on the first floor for garages or commercial space and housing on the upper floors. During an earthquake, these types of structures could sway or even collapse. HAZUS-MH estimates that approximately 76 percent of the total building stock within the county is built of wood. Single-family homes built prior to the 1970s are often not bolted to their foundations, and walls surrounding crawl spaces are not braced (i.e., cripple walls). Typical earthquake damage to these structures include cracked foundations, chimneys breaking at the roof line, wood frames coming off their foundations, and racking of cripple walls. Mobile homes that are built of light-weight metal or a combination of steel frame and wood are easily damaged by a quake. Mobile homes installed prior to 1995 were often not attached to their foundations and could shift off their supports. Based on data from HAZUS-MH, manufactured homes make up approximately 9 percent of the county’s building stock. The last type of susceptible building material is unreinforced masonry—masonry walls that have not been reinforced with steel. These buildings were often built before 1960 in an era when reinforcing was not generally used, anchorage to floors and roofs was missing, and use of low-strength lime mortar was common. Earthquake damage to these buildings can be severe. A lack of reinforcement and tie-downs can result in substantial damage in the form of cracked or leaning walls. Damage may also occur between the walls, and separation between the framing and walls could lead to full collapse due to a lack of vertical support. HAZUS-MH reports that around 8 percent of the buildings within the county are unreinforced masonry buildings. Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Critical infrastructure and key resources within Augusta-Richmond County include assets, systems, and networks that are vital to the continued operation of government services. The incapacitation or destruction of these resources would have a debilitating effect on the county’s security, economy, and/or public health. There are a handful of key resource categories that could be impacted by an earthquake including transportation systems, communication systems, and utility systems. Historically, the county has not been impacted by an earthquake with more than a moderate intensity so damage to 6 Association of Bay Area Governments. (2012). Guide to housing vulnerable resources. Retrieved January 3, 2017, from http://quake.abag.ca.gov/housing/ SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:21 these resources would be very minor; however, an inspection of certain features after a strongly felt earthquake may be necessary. Economy There are three primary sources of economic loss associated with an earthquake in Richmond County: property damage and business interruption costs; cost to repair public transportation, communication, or utility systems; and debris removal costs. Historically, there have been no major economic losses from earthquakes felt within the county. Environment There would be no substantial impacts to the environment following a large earthquake that is felt in Augusta-Richmond County with a moderate intensity. Secondary effects from the damage of the key resources mentioned above (e.g., utility systems) could impact the environment, but the probability of this type of situation is very small. Damage to a facility that houses chemicals or hazardous materials may release these dangerous materials cause damage to the surrounding environment. 5.6 EXTREME HEAT 5.6.1 Background Extreme heat, like drought, poses little risk to property. However, extreme heat can have devastating effects on health. Extreme heat is often referred to as a “heat wave.” According to the National Weather Service, there is no universal definition for a heat wave, but the standard U.S. definition is any event lasting at least three days where temperatures reach ninety degrees Fahrenheit or higher. However, it may also be defined as an event at least three days long where temperatures are ten degrees greater than the normal temperature for the affected area. Heat waves are typically accompanied by humidity but may also be very dry. These conditions can pose serious health threats causing an average of 1,500 deaths each summer in the United States.7 According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, heat is the number one weather- related killer among natural hazards, followed by frigid winter temperatures. The National Weather Service devised the Heat Index as a mechanism to better inform the public of heat dangers. The Heat Index Chart, shown in Figure 5.8, uses air temperature and humidity to determine the heat index or apparent temperature. Table 5.14 shows the dangers associated with different heat index temperatures. Some populations, such as the elderly and young, are more susceptible to heat danger than other segments of the population. 7 http://www.noaawatch.gov/themes/heat.php SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:22 FIGURE 5.8: HEAT INDEX CHART Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration TABLE 5.14: HEAT DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH HEAT INDEX TEMPERATURE Heat Index Temperature (Fahrenheit) Description of Risks 80°- 90° Fatigue possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity 90°- 105° Sunstroke, heat cramps, and heat exhaustion possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity 105°- 130° Sunstroke, heat cramps, and heat exhaustion likely, and heatstroke possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity 130° or higher Heatstroke or sunstroke is highly likely with continued exposure Source: National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration In addition, the National Weather Service issues a number of heat-related cautions in order to better inform and warn the public of heat dangers. These are outlined below in Table 5.15. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:23 TABLE 5.15: NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE HEAT-RELATED ALERTS Alert Type Description of Alert Excessive Heat Warning An Excessive Heat Warning is issued within 12 hours of the onset of extremely dangerous heat conditions. The general rule of thumb for this Warning is when the maximum heat index temperature is expected to be 105°F or higher for at least 2 days and night time air temperatures will not drop below 75°F. Excessive Heat Watch Heat watches are issued when conditions are favorable for an excessive heat event in the next 24 to 72 hours. A Watch is used when the risk of a heat wave has increased but its occurrence and timing is still uncertain. Heat Advisory A Heat Advisory is issued within 12 hours of the onset of extremely dangerous heat conditions. The general rule of thumb for this Advisory is when the maximum heat index temperature is expected to be 100°F or higher for at least 2 days, and night time air temperatures will not drop below 75°F. Excessive Heat Outlook Excessive Heat Outlooks are issued when the potential exists for an excessive heat event in the next 3-7 days. An Outlook provides information to those who need considerable lead-time to prepare for the event. Source: National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration People living in urban areas are often most vulnerable to heat events because stagnant atmospheric conditions trap pollutants, thus adding unhealthy air to excessively hot temperatures. In addition, the “urban heat island effect” can produce significantly higher nighttime temperatures because asphalt and concrete (which store heat longer) gradually release heat at night. Finally, it should be noted that elderly and aging populations—one of the fastest growing age demographics nationally—are highly vulnerable to heat-related illnesses. 5.6.2 Location and Spatial Extent Excessive heat typically impacts a large area and cannot be confined to any geographic or political boundaries, so the entire county is susceptible to extreme heat conditions. 5.6.3 Historical Occurrences According to the Piedmont Together Climate Adaptation Report, the 10 warmest years in recorded history have occurred since 1997. Although data from the National Climatic Data Center was evaluated to determine historical extreme heat and heat wave events in Augusta-Richmond County, it did not report any events. As such, the planning team collected data from the Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network’s weather stations website. This site includes high and low temperatures for each day of the year at several weather stations across Georgia. Even though no stations are located directly in Augusta, there are several nearby stations that can provide information that is likely comparable to temperatures within the county. Stations at Clarks- Hill, South Carolina and Dearing, Georgia were used to collect historic high temperatures from the last ten years. Table 5.16 includes the data collected from these stations and shows that many years, the highest recorded temperature was well above 95°F. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:24 TABLE 5.16: HIGHEST RECORDED ANNUAL TEMPERATURES AT SELECTED WEATHER STATIONS Year Clarks-Hill, SC Dearing, GA 2007 105.4⁰F 105.2⁰F 2008 101.7⁰F 101.8⁰F 2009 99.9⁰F 98.8⁰F 2010 101.5⁰F 101.5⁰F 2011 102.4⁰F 103.1⁰F 2012 106.2⁰F 110.4⁰F 2013 95.3⁰F 95.4⁰F 2014 98.9⁰F 99.7⁰F 2015 101.2⁰F 100.3⁰F 2016 100.6⁰F 99.2⁰F Source: Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network 5.6.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Based on historical occurrence information, it is assumed that all of Augusta-Richmond County has a probability level of highly likely (near 100 percent annual probability) for future extreme heat events to impact the county. Additionally, according to the National Climate Assessment, the increase in the number of days over 95°F is likely to increase over the 30 to 50 years when compared to a baseline over the last 30 years of the 20th century. Figure 5.9 shows both the baseline, historical number of days over 95°F from 1971 to 2000 and the projection for the 2041 to 2070 period. Figure 5.10 shows the projected change in number of days between the historic data and the projected data. This increase in days of extreme heat due to climate change will likely result in a higher number of rolling brown/blackouts and decreased air quality in the county. FIGURE 5.9: NUMBER OF DAYS OVER 95 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT Source: National Climate Assessment SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:25 FIGURE 5.10: PROJECTED CHANGE IN NUMBER OF DAYS OVER 95 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT Source: National Climate Assessment 5.6.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Extreme heat can affect many people and to varying degrees. Often the elderly and very young are susceptible to the most detrimental impacts, but heat stroke and exhaustion can plague anyone. A heat wave or extreme heat event would have minimal effects on public confidence as these events are frequent and the public likely understands the potential impacts. Responders Extreme heat can also affect responders who are often more susceptible to heat stroke and exhaustion due to the nature of their work which often forces police and emergency medical providers to be exposed to the elements. In these cases, responders could be negatively impacted by extreme heat and will need to protect themselves by preparing accordingly. Continuity of Operations Extreme heat would likely have few impacts on continuity of operations as the warning time for these events is usually long and direct impacts to large numbers of personnel or other resources necessary to maintain operations are unlikely. If air conditioning systems in operations centers break down due to overuse, operations could be interrupted or forced to move to secondary facilities. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:26 Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Extreme heat would likely have a minor effect on the built environment, although high temperatures could potentially put a strain on infrastructure such as power generation and water systems due to higher demand. Economy An extreme heat event could potentially have a negative impact on the economy in the short term as the public may be advised to stay inside, causing them to reduce overall spending and negatively impact businesses in the community. Extended periods of extreme heat may also disrupt the local economy if agricultural, dairy, and livestock production declines, resulting in income loss for famers and others affected. Environment The environment would be impacted by extreme heat as many plants and animals that are not able to withstand the heat may die off and crops and livestock may be impacted by unusually high temperatures, resulting in death or illness. 5.7 FLOODING 5.7.1 Background Flooding is the most frequent and costly natural hazard in the United States and is a hazard that has caused more than 10,000 deaths since 1900. Nearly 90 percent of presidential disaster declarations result from natural events where flooding was a major component. Floods generally result from excessive precipitation and can be classified under two categories: general floods, which are defined by precipitation over a given river basin for a long period of time along with storm-induced wave action, and flash floods, the product of heavy localized precipitation in a short time period over a given location. The severity of a flooding event is typically determined by a combination of several major factors, including stream and river basin topography and physiography, precipitation and weather patterns, recent soil moisture conditions, and the degree of vegetative clearing and impervious surface. General floods are usually long-term events that may last for several days. The primary types of general flooding include riverine, coastal, and urban flooding. Riverine flooding is a function of excessive precipitation levels and water runoff volumes within the watershed of a stream or river. Coastal flooding is typically a result of storm surge, wind-driven waves, and heavy rainfall produced by hurricanes, tropical storms, and other large coastal storms. Urban flooding occurs where manmade development has obstructed the natural flow of water and decreased the ability of natural groundcover to absorb and retain surface water runoff. Most flash flooding is caused by slow-moving thunderstorms in a local area or by heavy rains associated with hurricanes and tropical storms. However, flash flooding events may also occur from a dam or levee failure within minutes or hours of heavy amounts of rainfall or from a sudden release of water held by a retention basin or other stormwater control facility. Although flash flooding occurs most often along mountain streams, it is also common in urbanized areas where much of the ground is covered by impervious surfaces. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:27 The periodic flooding of lands adjacent to rivers, streams, and shorelines (land known as a floodplain) is a natural and inevitable occurrence that can be expected to take place based upon established recurrence intervals. The recurrence interval of a flood is defined as the average time interval, in years, expected between a flood event of a particular magnitude and an equal or larger flood. Flood magnitude increases with increasing recurrence interval. Floodplains are designated by the frequency of the flood that is large enough to cover them. For example, the 10-year floodplain will be covered by the 10-year flood and the 100-year floodplain by the 100-year flood. Flood frequencies, such as the 100-year flood, are determined by plotting a graph of the size of all known floods for an area and determining how often floods of a particular size occur. Another way of expressing the flood frequency is the chance of occurrence in a given year, which is the percentage of the probability of flooding each year. For example, the 100-year flood has a 1 percent chance of occurring in any given year and the 500-year flood has a 0.2 percent chance of occurring in any given year. 5.7.2 Location and Spatial Extent There are areas in Augusta-Richmond County that are susceptible to flood events. Special flood hazard areas in Augusta-Richmond County were mapped using Geographic Information System (GIS) and FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRM).8 This includes Zone A (1-percent annual chance floodplain), Zone AE (1-percent annual chance floodplain with elevation) and Zone X500 (0.2-percent annual chance floodplain). There are also some areas within the county that are designated as levee protected areas. According to GIS analysis, of the 320.9 square miles of land that make up Augusta-Richmond County, there are 82.6 square miles of land in zone A and AE (1-percent annual chance floodplain/100-year floodplain) and 5.8 square miles of land in zone X500 (0.2-percent annual chance floodplain/500-year floodplain). These flood zone values account for 19.7 percent of the total land area in Augusta- Richmond County. It is important to note that while FEMA digital flood data is recognized as best available data for planning purposes, it does not always reflect the most accurate and up-to-date flood risk. Flooding and flood-related losses often do occur outside of delineated special flood hazard areas. Figure 5.11, Figure 5.12, Figure 5.13, and Figure 5.14 illustrate the location and extent of currently mapped special flood hazard areas for Augusta-Richmond County and its municipalities based on best available FEMA DFIRM data. 8 The county-level DFIRM used for Augusta-Richmond County was updated in 2011. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:28 FIGURE 5.11: SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:29 FIGURE 5.12: SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IN BLYTHE Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:30 FIGURE 5.13: SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IN FORT GORDON Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:31 FIGURE 5.14: SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IN HEPHZIBAH Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency 5.7.3 Historical Occurrences Information from the National Climatic Data Center was used to ascertain historical flood events. The National Climatic Data Center reported a total of 24 events throughout Augusta-Richmond County since 1996.9 A summary of these events is presented in Table 5.17. These events accounted for over $800,000 (2016 dollars) in property damage throughout the county.10 Specific information on flood events for each jurisdiction, including date, type of flooding, and deaths and injuries, can be found in Table 5.18. TABLE 5.17: SUMMARY OF FLOOD OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Occurrences Deaths / Injuries Property Damage (2016) Augusta-Richmond County 23 0/0 $845,826 9 These flood events are only inclusive of those reported by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) from 1996 through 2016. It is likely that additional occurrences have occurred and have gone unreported in Augusta-Richmond County. 10 Adjusted dollar values were calculated based on the average Consumer Price Index for a given calendar year. This index value has been calculated every year since 1913. For 2016, the October 2016 monthly index was used. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:32 Location Number of Occurrences Deaths / Injuries Property Damage (2016) Blythe 0 0/0 $0 Fort Gordon 1 0/0 $2,066 Hephzibah 0 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 24 0/0 $847,892 Source: National Climatic Data Center TABLE 5.18: HISTORICAL FLOOD OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Date Type Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* Augusta-Richmond County NORTHERN HALF 3/7/1996 Flash Flood 0/0 $613,504 AUGUSTA 12/24/1997 Flash Flood 0/0 $2,999 AUGUSTA 3/8/1998 Flash Flood 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 9/3/1998 Flash Flood 0/0 $0 COUNTYWIDE 6/20/2000 Flash Flood 0/0 $0 COUNTYWIDE 5/30/2002 Flash Flood 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/18/2003 Flash Flood 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 8/8/2003 Flash Flood 0/0 $0 (AGS) BUSH FLD AUGUSTA 1/25/2010 Flash Flood 0/0 $22,072 AVONDALE 8/7/2012 Flash Flood 0/0 $10,481 LAKEMONT 8/7/2012 Flash Flood 0/0 $83,851 LAKEMONT 8/7/2012 Flash Flood 0/0 $16,770 NATIONAL HILLS 8/7/2012 Flash Flood 0/0 $62,888 PEACH ORCHARD 8/7/2012 Flash Flood 0/0 $10,481 DE BRUCE 8/11/2012 Flash Flood 0/0 $4,193 DE BRUCE 8/11/2012 Flash Flood 0/0 $4,193 DE BRUCE 8/11/2012 Flash Flood 0/0 $2,096 NATIONAL HILLS 7/10/2013 Flash Flood 0/0 $4,132 NATIONAL HILLS 7/11/2013 Flash Flood 0/0 $2,066 AUGUSTA 6/24/2014 Flash Flood 0/0 $1,017 AUGUSTA DANIEL ARPT 6/24/2014 Flash Flood 0/0 $2,033 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 6/24/2014 Flash Flood 0/0 $2,033 AUGUSTA DANIEL ARPT 6/4/2015 Flash Flood 0/0 $1,015 Blythe None Reported -- -- -- -- Fort Gordon FORT GORDON 7/12/2013 Flash Flood 0/0 $2,066 Hephzibah None Reported -- -- -- -- *Property damage is reported in 2016 dollars; All damage may not have been reported. Source: National Climatic Data Center SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:33 5.7.4 Historical Summary of Insured Flood Losses According to FEMA flood insurance policy records as of October 2016, there have been 1,064 flood losses reported in Augusta-Richmond County through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) since 1978, totaling over $3.2 million in claims payments. A summary of these figures for each community is provided in Table 5.19. It should be emphasized that these numbers include only those losses to structures that were insured through the NFIP policies, and for losses in which claims were sought and received. It is likely that many additional instances of flood loss in Augusta-Richmond County were either uninsured, denied claims payment, or not reported. TABLE 5.19: SUMMARY OF INSURED FLOOD LOSSES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Policies Number of Claims Claims Payments Augusta† 0 72 $717,751 Blythe* -- -- -- Hephzibah 2 0 $0 Augusta-Richmond County 1,062 270 $2,574,566 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 1,064 342 $3,292,317 †This claims data pre-dates the consolidation of the city-county *Community does not participate in the NFIP. Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Flood Insurance Program 5.7.5 Repetitive and Severe Repetitive Loss Properties FEMA defines a repetitive loss property as any insurable building for which two or more claims of more than $1,000 were paid by the NFIP within any rolling 10-year period, since 1978. A repetitive loss property may or may not be currently insured by the NFIP. Currently there are over 140,000 repetitive loss properties nationwide. As of October 2016, there are 36 non-mitigated repetitive loss properties located in Augusta-Richmond County, which accounted for 91 losses and over $740,000 in claims payments under the NFIP. Nearly all of the properties are single-family residential buildings (26). Ten (10) of the remaining are other types of residential and the last (1) is non-residential (commercial). Without mitigation these properties will likely continue to experience flood loses. Table 5.20 presents a summary these figures for Augusta- Richmond County. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:34 TABLE 5.20: SUMMARY OF REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Properties Types of Properties Number of Losses Building Payments Average Payment Augusta-Richmond County 35 26 single- family residential; 9 other residential; 1 non- residential 89 $730,275 $8,205 Blythe* -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah 1 1 other residential 2 $10,564 $5,282 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 36 -- 91 $740,839 $8,141 Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Georgia Emergency Management Agency 5.7.6 Probability of Future Occurrences Flood events will remain a threat in Augusta-Richmond County, and the probability of future occurrences will remain highly likely (100 percent annual probability). The probability of future flood events based on magnitude and according to best available data is illustrated in the figure above, which indicates those areas susceptible to the 1-percent annual chance flood (100-year floodplain) and the 0.2-percent annual chance flood (500-year floodplain). It can be inferred from the floodplain location maps, previous occurrences, and repetitive loss properties that risk varies throughout Augusta-Richmond County. For example, Blythe likely has much lower risk of flood than the other communities. Additionally, according to the National Climate Assessment, the increased likelihood of extreme participation events due to climate change will result in greater risks of flash flooding and impacts from stormwater runoff in the county. Indeed, even though there may be less precipitation overall in the long term (leading to more frequent drought events), the rainfall that does occur will be more likely to occur during consolidated periods, causing heavy rainfall events that may lead to flash flooding. That is to say, that while overall precipitation may decline, flooding impacts may actually intensify as a result of climate change. This is especially true in the southeastern United States which is located in a sort of middle ground between the southwestern states (which will likely be experiencing significant declines in precipitation) and northeastern states (which will likely be experiencing significant increases in precipitation). The result will be that there are likely to be periods of both drought and substantial precipitation in the southeast going forward. 5.7.7 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) During flood events, people are often stranded and have to be rescued by first responders. Often lives are lost or people are injured. Public confidence is often impacted by flood events, especially when impacted people do not have flood insurance and are not covered by their home insurance policy. This can create public relations issues for government entities. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:35 Responders Responders are often affected by flooding because floods can trap people in their homes or in other locations, forcing responders to put their lives at risk to return members of the public to safety. Often responders in flood situations face blocked roads and have difficulty safely protecting citizens. Continuity of Operations Flooding can impact continuity of operations by knocking out power sources and preventing emergency management personnel from being able to do their jobs properly. Floods typically have some impact on continuity of operations as they can cause severe disruption to normal operations and have done so in the past in Augusta-Richmond County. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Many buildings and structures could be impacted by a flood event. For a more detailed analysis of flood prone properties, see Section 6: Hazard Vulnerability. Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Critical infrastructure and key resources (CIKR) within Augusta-Richmond County include assets, systems, and networks that are vital to the continued operation of government services. The incapacitation or destruction of these resources would have a debilitating effect on the county’s security, economy, and/or public health. Economy There are a variety of economic impacts that could result from a large-scale flood event. Perhaps the biggest impact would be that many businesses that are flooded would have to shut down at least temporarily in the wake of a flood event to repair and rebuild the structures in which they are located. Of more concern may be that, according to the National Flood Insurance Program, almost 40 percent of small businesses that are impacted by a flood never reopen their doors following the disaster. This demonstrates that the economic impact of flooding events is ongoing even after the flood waters have receded and that the long-term health of the local economy will likely be slow to recover. Environment The fluctuation of water levels in a wetland, especially flood waters, supports the biological diversity of low-lying areas by releasing nutrients into the soil and germinating wetland flora. Flooding also offers some control of invasive water weeds. Another impact is on soil that is covered by flood waters, causing the rapid depletion of oxygen which is essential for plant growth and development. Flooding may modify nutrients within the soil either by leaching or changing their availability to the plant. Impact from submersion will vary with duration and temperature, but it is notable that ongoing food supplies and other plants The full extent of injury to seedlings would be determined by the current stage of development at the time of flooding, duration of the flood event, air and soil temperatures, and the presence of axillary buds. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:36 5.8 HAIL 5.8.1 Background Hailstorms are a potentially damaging outgrowth of severe thunderstorms (thunderstorms are discussed in a separate sub-section). Early in the developmental stages of a hailstorm, ice crystals form within a low-pressure front due to the rapid rising of warm air into the upper atmosphere and the subsequent cooling of the air mass. Frozen droplets gradually accumulate on the ice crystals until they develop to a sufficient weight and fall as precipitation. Hail typically takes the form of spheres or irregularly-shaped masses greater than 0.75 inches in diameter. The size of hailstones is a direct function of the size and severity of the storm. High velocity updraft winds are required to keep hail in suspension in thunderclouds. The strength of the updraft is a function of the intensity of heating at the Earth’s surface. Higher temperature gradients relative to elevation above the surface result in increased suspension time and hailstone size. Table 5.21 shows the TORRO Hailstorm Intensity Scale which is a way of measuring hail severity. TABLE 5.21: TORRO HAILSTORM INTENSITY SCALE Intensity Category Typical Hail Diameter (mm)* Typical Hail Diameter (in)* Probable Kinetic Energy, J-m2 Typical Damage Impacts H0 Hard Hail 5 0 - 0.2 0-20 No damage H1 Potentially Damaging 5-15 0.2 - 0.6 >20 Slight general damage to plants, crops H2 Significant 10-20 0.4 - 0.8 >100 Significant damage to fruit, crops, vegetation H3 Severe 20-30 0.8 - 1.2 >300 Severe damage to fruit and crops, damage to glass and plastic structures, paint and wood scored H4 Severe 25-40 1.0 - 1.6 >500 Widespread glass damage, vehicle bodywork damage H5 Destructive 30-50 1.2 - 2.0 >800 Wholesale destruction of glass, damage to tiled roofs, significant risk of injuries H6 Destructive 40-60 1.6 - 2.4 Bodywork of grounded aircraft dented, brick walls pitted H7 Destructive 50-75 2.0 - 3.0 Severe roof damage, risk of serious injuries H8 Destructive 60-90 1.6 - 3.5 (Severest recorded in the British Isles) Severe damage to aircraft bodywork H9 Super Hailstorms 75-100 3.0 - 3.9 Extensive structural damage. Risk of severe or even fatal injuries to persons caught in the open H10 Super Hailstorms >100 >4.0 Extensive structural damage. Risk of severe or even fatal injuries to persons caught in the open *Approximate range (typical maximum size in bold), since other factors (e.g. number and density of hailstones, hail fall speed and surface wind speeds) affect severity. Source: Torro Hailstorm Intensity Scale (http://www.torro.org.uk/hscale.php) SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:37 5.8.2 Location and Spatial Extent Hailstorms frequently accompany thunderstorms, so their locations and spatial extents coincide. It is assumed that Augusta-Richmond County is uniformly exposed to severe thunderstorms; therefore, all areas of the county are equally exposed to hail which may be produced by such storms. The location of historic hail events that occurred in Augusta-Richmond County can be found in Figure 5.15. FIGURE 5.15: HISTORIC HAIL TRACKS Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency 5.8.3 Historical Occurrences According to the National Climatic Data Center, 72 recorded hailstorm events have affected Augusta- Richmond County since 1950.11 Table 5.22 is a summary of the hail events in Augusta-Richmond County. Table 5.23 provides detailed information about each event that occurred in the county. Records from 11 These hail events are only inclusive of those reported by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) from 1950 through October 2016. It is likely that additional hail events have affected Augusta-Richmond County. In addition to NCDC, the North Carolina Department of Insurance office was contacted for information. As additional local data becomes available, this hazard profile will be amended. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:38 NCDC report hail occurrences resulted in over $30,000 (2016 dollars) in property damages.12 Hail ranged in diameter from 0.75 inches to 1.75 inches. It should be noted that hail is notorious for causing substantial damage to roofs, gutters, siding, and other areas of the built environment that may not be reported to the National Climatic Data Center. Therefore, it is likely that damages are greater than the reported value. The location of historic hail events that occurred in Augusta-Richmond County can be found in Figure 5.16. TABLE 5.22: SUMMARY OF HAIL OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Occurrences Deaths / Injuries Property Damage (2016) Augusta-Richmond County 55 0/0 $30,716 Blythe 0 0/0 $0 Fort Gordon 6 0/0 $0 Hephzibah 11 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 72 0/0 $30,716 Source: National Climatic Data Center TABLE 5.23: HISTORICAL HAIL OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Date Magnitude Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* Augusta-Richmond County RICHMOND CO. 5/12/1955 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/28/1962 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/21/1967 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/12/1971 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/28/1972 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 10/4/1979 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 2/16/1982 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 2/16/1982 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/10/1982 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/15/1983 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/14/1984 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/14/1984 1.25 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/14/1984 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/14/1984 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/14/1984 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/17/1984 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/2/1985 1.50 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/2/1985 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/26/1986 1.50 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/30/1988 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 1/29/1990 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 Augusta 3/31/1993 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 1/2/1996 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 12 Adjusted dollar values were calculated based on the average Consumer Price Index for a given calendar year. This index value has been calculated every year since 1913. For 2016, the October 2016 monthly index was used. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:39 Date Magnitude Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* AUGUSTA AIRPORT 1/2/1996 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 3/15/1996 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/7/1996 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 4/22/1997 1.75 in. 0/0 $14,994 AUGUSTA 4/3/1998 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 4/8/1998 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 4/22/1998 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/10/1998 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/16/1998 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/19/1998 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/19/1998 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 3/31/2002 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 3/31/2002 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 3/31/2002 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/3/2002 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/3/2002 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/6/2003 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 2/21/2005 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 4/22/2005 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 2/13/2007 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/12/2007 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 MC BEAN 3/15/2008 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/20/2008 1.25 in. 0/0 $0 MC BEAN 8/16/2008 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 8/11/2009 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 7/31/2010 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 GRACEWOOD 6/21/2011 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUSTA 8/13/2011 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 2/24/2012 1.75 in. 0/0 $15,772 BEL AIR 4/3/2012 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 MC BEAN 7/5/2012 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 MC BEAN 9/17/2014 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 Blythe None Reported -- -- -- -- Fort Gordon FT GORDON 2/21/2005 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 2/21/2005 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 5/10/2005 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 5/20/2005 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 12/4/2005 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 7/5/2012 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 Hephzibah HEPHZEBAH 3/17/1996 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 6/10/1998 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 5/3/2002 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 5/10/2005 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:40 Date Magnitude Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* HEPHZIBAH 7/29/2005 0.75 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 12/28/2005 0.88 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 2/13/2007 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 5/20/2008 1.75 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 5/26/2011 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 5/26/2011 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 6/21/2011 1.00 in. 0/0 $0 *Property damage is reported in 2016 dollars; All damage may not have been reported. Source: National Climatic Data Center FIGURE 5.16: HISTORIC HAIL TRACKS Source: NOAA 5.8.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Based on historical occurrence information, it is assumed that the probability of future hail occurrences is highly likely (100 percent annual probability). Since hail is an atmospheric hazard (coinciding with thunderstorms), it is expected that future hail events will frequently continue to cause minor damage to homes and other personal property throughout the county. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:41 5.8.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Hail can have a negative impact on the public as it can often cause injury if people are struck by hail stones. Often the impoverished or homeless are detrimentally impacted if they cannot find shelter, but hail can impact anyone. There would be little negative impact on public confidence as hail events are frequent and generally do not engender distrust in the local community’s governing ability. Responders Hail can also affect responders who are often more susceptible to hail events due to the nature of their work which often forces police and emergency medical providers to be exposed to the elements. In these cases, responders could be negatively impacted by hail. Continuity of Operations Hail would likely have some impacts on continuity of operations as the warning time for these events is usually shorter and hail stones could potentially knock out power supplies or other critical resources which would affect operations temporarily. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Hail can often have a significant effect on the built environment, depending on the size of the hail stones. Often these can damage roofs or other parts of homes and businesses as they are essentially rocks that are being propelled at high speeds. Hail can affect most any type of facility or infrastructure as well, causing damage to the structure. Economy A hailstorm could negatively impact the economy to some degree if the damage from the storm is large enough. Often hail causes a great deal of damage to personal property such as cars and homes, and these impacts would hurt the overall economy due to recovery efforts. Environment Hail often has a serious effect on crops and other plants and has been known to cause millions of dollars’ worth of damage to farmers. It can also negatively impact livestock, as well as any flora or fauna that is not properly sheltered. However, overall impacts to the environment would be relatively small. 5.9 HURRICANE/TROPICAL STORM 5.9.1 Background Hurricanes and tropical storms are classified as cyclones and defined as any closed circulation developing around a low-pressure center in which the winds rotate counter-clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere (or clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere) and whose diameter averages 10 to 30 miles across. A tropical cyclone refers to any such circulation that develops over tropical waters. Tropical cyclones act as a “safety-valve,” limiting the continued build-up of heat and energy in tropical regions by maintaining the atmospheric heat and moisture balance between the tropics and the pole-ward SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:42 latitudes. The primary damaging forces associated with these storms are high-level sustained winds, heavy precipitation, and tornadoes. The key energy source for a tropical cyclone is the release of latent heat from the condensation of warm water. Their formation requires a low-pressure disturbance, warm sea surface temperature, rotational force from the spinning of the earth, and the absence of wind shear in the lowest 50,000 feet of the atmosphere. The majority of hurricanes and tropical storms form in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico during the official Atlantic hurricane season, which encompasses the months of June through November. The peak of the Atlantic hurricane season is in early to mid-September and the average number of storms that reach hurricane intensity per year in the Atlantic basin is about six. As an incipient hurricane develops, barometric pressure (measured in millibars or inches) at its center falls and winds increase. If the atmospheric and oceanic conditions are favorable, it can intensify into a tropical depression. When maximum sustained winds reach or exceed 39 miles per hour, the system is designated a tropical storm, given a name, and is closely monitored by the National Hurricane Center in Miami, Florida. When sustained winds reach or exceed 74 miles per hour the storm is deemed a hurricane. Hurricane intensity is further classified by the Saffir-Simpson Scale (Table 5.24), which rates hurricane intensity on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the most intense. TABLE 5.24: SAFFIR-SIMPSON SCALE Category Maximum Sustained Wind Speed (MPH) Minimum Surface Pressure (Millibars) 1 74–95 Greater than 980 2 96–110 979–965 3 111–129 964–945 4 130–156 944–920 5 157 + Less than 920 Source: National Hurricane Center (2012) The Saffir-Simpson Scale categorizes hurricane intensity linearly based upon maximum sustained winds and barometric pressure, which are combined to estimate potential damage. Categories 3, 4, and 5 are classified as “major” hurricanes and, while hurricanes within this range comprise only 20 percent of total tropical cyclone landfalls, they account for over 70 percent of the damage in the United States. Table 5.25 describes the damage that could be expected for each category of hurricane. Damage during hurricanes may also result from spawned tornadoes, storm surge, and inland flooding associated with heavy rainfall that usually accompanies these storms. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:43 TABLE 5.25: HURRICANE DAMAGE CLASSIFICATIONS Storm Category Damage Level Description of Damages Photo Example 1 MINIMAL No real damage to building structures. Damage primarily to unanchored mobile homes, shrubbery, and trees. Also, some coastal flooding and minor pier damage. 2 MODERATE Some roofing material, door, and window damage. Considerable damage to vegetation, mobile homes, etc. Flooding damages piers and small craft in unprotected moorings may break their moorings. 3 EXTENSIVE Some structural damage to small residences and utility buildings, with a minor amount of curtainwall failures. Mobile homes are destroyed. Flooding near the coast destroys smaller structures, with larger structures damaged by floating debris. Terrain may be flooded well inland. 4 EXTREME More extensive curtainwall failures with some complete roof structure failure on small residences. Major erosion of beach areas. Terrain may be flooded well inland. 5 CATASTROPHIC Complete roof failure on many residences and industrial buildings. Some complete building failures with small utility buildings blown over or away. Flooding causes major damage to lower floors of all structures near the shoreline. Massive evacuation of residential areas may be required. Source: National Hurricane Center; Federal Emergency Management Agency 5.9.2 Location and Spatial Extent Hurricanes and tropical storms threaten the entire Atlantic and Gulf seaboard of the United States. While coastal areas are most directly exposed to the brunt of landfalling storms, their impact is often felt hundreds of miles inland and they can affect Augusta-Richmond County. All areas in Augusta- Richmond County are equally susceptible to hurricane and tropical storms. 5.9.3 Historical Occurrences According to the National Hurricane Center’s historical storm track records, 74 hurricane/tropical storm tracks have passed within 75 miles of Augusta-Richmond County since 1850.13 This includes 20 hurricanes, 21 tropical storms, and 33 tropical depressions. Of the recorded storm events, 11 have traversed directly through Augusta-Richmond County as shown in Figure 5.17. Table 5.26 provides the date of occurrence, name (if applicable), maximum wind speed (as recorded within 75 miles of Augusta-Richmond County), and Category of the storm based on the Saffir-Simpson Scale for each event. 13 These storm track statistics do not include extra-tropical storms. Though these related hazard events are less severe in intensity, they may cause significant local impact in terms of rainfall and high winds. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:44 FIGURE 5.17: HISTORICAL HURRICANE STORM TRACKS WITHIN 75 MILES OF AUGUSTA- RICHMOND COUNTY Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Hurricane Center TABLE 5.26: HISTORICAL STORM TRACKS WITHIN 75 MILES OF AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY (1850–2016) Date of Occurrence Storm Name Maximum Wind Speed (knots) Storm Category 8/24/1851 UNNAMED 69.67 Category 1 8/27/1852 UNNAMED 42.69 Tropical Storm 10/10/1852 UNNAMED 69.67 Category 1 9/9/1854 UNNAMED 85.03 Category 2 8/31/1856 UNNAMED 69.67 Category 1 9/16/1859 UNNAMED 42.69 Tropical Storm 9/27/1861 NOT NAMED Not Available Tropical Depression 11/2/1861 NOT NAMED Not Available Tropical Depression 9/17/1863 NOT NAMED Not Available Tropical Depression 8/14/1867 NOT NAMED Not Available Tropical Depression 8/28/1871 UNNAMED 17.56 Tropical Depression 10/3/1877 UNNAMED 58.60 Tropical Storm SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:45 Date of Occurrence Storm Name Maximum Wind Speed (knots) Storm Category 9/10/1882 UNNAMED 42.69 Tropical Storm 9/11/1884 UNNAMED 42.69 Tropical Storm 9/23/1885 UNNAMED 69.67 Category 1 10/12/1885 UNNAMED 58.60 Tropical Storm 6/22/1886 UNNAMED 50.35 Tropical Storm 7/1/1886 UNNAMED 64.34 Category 1 10/20/1887 UNNAMED 17.56 Tropical Depression 9/9/1888 UNNAMED 42.69 Tropical Storm 9/24/1889 UNNAMED 50.35 Tropical Storm 8/28/1893 UNNAMED 89.03 Category 2 10/3/1893 UNNAMED 50.35 Tropical Storm 10/9/1894 UNNAMED 78.78 Category 1 7/8/1896 UNNAMED 32.60 Tropical Depression 8/31/1898 UNNAMED 69.67 Category 1 9/18/1901 UNNAMED 32.60 Tropical Depression 6/15/1902 UNNAMED 32.60 Tropical Depression 9/16/1903 UNNAMED 17.56 Tropical Depression 11/4/1904 UNNAMED 17.56 Tropical Depression 9/18/1906 UNNAMED 69.67 Category 1 7/2/1909 UNNAMED 4.99 Tropical Depression 8/28/1911 UNNAMED 58.60 Tropical Storm 6/14/1912 UNNAMED 32.60 Tropical Depression 8/3/1915 UNNAMED 42.69 Tropical Storm 9/30/1924 UNNAMED 64.34 Category 1 8/10/1928 UNNAMED 17.56 Tropical Depression 10/1/1929 UNNAMED 58.60 Tropical Storm 9/6/1933 UNNAMED 42.69 Tropical Storm 9/7/1933 UNNAMED 17.56 Tropical Depression 9/5/1935 UNNAMED 64.34 Category 1 8/12/1940 UNNAMED 73.83 Category 1 10/8/1941 UNNAMED 50.35 Tropical Storm 10/8/1946 UNNAMED 64.34 Category 1 10/8/1947 UNNAMED 0.87 Tropical Depression 8/28/1949 UNNAMED 73.83 Category 1 10/22/1950 LOVE 17.56 Tropical Depression 8/31/1952 ABLE 73.83 Category 1 9/1/1953 UNNAMED 17.56 Tropical Depression 9/26/1956 FLOSSY 42.69 Tropical Storm 6/2/1959 ARLENE 0.87 Tropical Depression 9/29/1959 GRACIE 96.54 Category 3 8/29/1964 CLEO 32.6 Tropical Depression 9/13/1964 DORA 42.69 Tropical Storm 6/15/1965 UNNAMED 42.69 Tropical Storm 6/7/1968 ABBY 50.35 Tropical Storm 5/25/1970 ALMA 4.99 Tropical Depression 6/20/1972 AGNES 17.56 Tropical Depression SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:46 Date of Occurrence Storm Name Maximum Wind Speed (knots) Storm Category 9/5/1979 DAVID 73.83 Category 1 11/22/1985 KATE 73.83 Category 1 8/14/1986 CHARLEY 0.00 Tropical Depression 8/28/1988 CHRIS 42.69 Tropical Storm 10/12/1990 MARCO 0.87 Tropical Depression 6/6/1995 ALLISON 32.60 Tropical Depression 8/27/1995 JERRY 0.87 Tropical Depression 7/23/1997 DANNY 0.87 Tropical Depression 9/3/1998 EARL 50.35 Tropical Storm 9/18/2000 GORDON 4.99 Tropical Depression 9/23/2000 HELENE 4.99 Tropical Depression 6/13/2001 ALLISON 4.99 Tropical Depression 7/26/2003 UNNAMED 4.99 Tropical Depression 9/27/2004 JEANNE 17.56 Tropical Depression 6/14/2006 ALBERTO 32.60 Tropical Depression 10/8/2016† MATTHEW 95.00 Category 2 †At the time this plan was developed, a storm track for Hurricane Matthew was not available digitally, but was definitively within 75 miles of Augusta-Richmond County Source: National Hurricane Center Hurricane Matthew (2016) had a major impact on many communities in the southeastern United States, affecting people and property from Florida to Virginia, as well as some areas in the northeast. Some additional information on this major storm is available below: Hurricane Matthew – October 8-9, 2016 Hurricane Matthew was the strongest storm on record in the Atlantic Basin during the 2016 season with peak wind speeds of around 160 miles per hour (while in the Caribbean). The storm caused more than 1,700 fatalities and 11.6 billion dollars in damages. As the storm approached Georgia, mandatory evacuation orders were issued for all areas of the state east of Interstate 95 and traffic lanes had to be reversed to support the evacuation. Over 250,000 people lost power across the state and at least 3 deaths were a result of the storm, leading to a disaster declaration for many counties. In the end, the storm was one of the most devastating to impact Georgia in many years and recovery efforts were still under way as of the writing of this plan. 5.9.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Given the inland location of the county, it is not likely to be affected by storm surge or many of the other problems that coastal counties may face when it comes to hurricanes. However, the county will still be impacted by flooding and high winds. Thus, the probability of being impacted is less than coastal areas, but still remains a real threat to Augusta-Richmond County due to induced events like flooding. Based on historical evidence, the probability level of future occurrence is likely (between 10 and 100 percent annual probability). However, when the county is impacted, the damage could be large-scale, threatening lives and property throughout the planning area. Additionally, as NOAA reports in Figure 5.18, climate change will likely cause more frequent, stronger storms in the future due to rising surface temperatures. That is to say, SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:47 NOAA models predict that while there may be less frequent, low-category storm events (Tropical Storms, Category 1 Hurricanes), there will be more, high-category storm events (Category 4 and 5 Hurricanes) in the future. This means that there may be fewer hurricanes overall in any given year, but when hurricanes do form, it is more likely that they will become large storms that can create massive damage. Therefore, the increased likelihood of large hurricanes due to climate change will result in greater wind damage and increased flooding in the county. FIGURE 5.18: NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION CLIMATE MODELS PROJECTION FOR FUTURE HURRICANES Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration GFDL 5.9.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) It is reasonable to assume that a number of people would be displaced from their homes and will require accommodations in temporary public shelters due to a hurricane. This hazard could potentially have a negative effect on public confidence due to the possibility of a high magnitude event and the difficulties that might arise for governments in terms of response and recovery. Responders The impacts on responders from this type of storm could potentially be very high as responders may be physically injured or killed during a storm event by flooding or high winds. In addition, their homes and personal effects could also be impacted which would limit their response capability. In terms of on-the-ground response capacity, downed trees in the wake of a hurricane often block roads and make ingress and egress difficult, thereby causing issues with response time. This is also often true SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:48 of the resulting floodwaters. Moreover, due to the large scale spatial impact of hurricanes and the number of citizens affected by the storm, response time will be reduced because of the number of incidents that require emergency responders. Continuity of Operations Continuity of operations in a hurricane event can be severely affected if power is lost or if critical facilities or infrastructure are damaged during an event. Although Augusta-Richmond County has a plan in place to maintain continuity of operations in the event of a storm, a hurricane with a high magnitude would likely disrupt operations to some degree due to the impacts it would have on personnel. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Many buildings and structures could be impacted by a hurricane or tropical storm event. For a detailed analysis of dollar damage to properties, see Section 6: Hazard Vulnerability. Economy In general, the economy would be severely impacted by a hurricane or tropical storm event. Due to the massive scale of these events and multiple types of impacts from flooding and high winds, commerce would definitively slow down as efforts to rebuild are undertaken after the storm. Debris Generation HAZUS-MH estimates the amount of debris that will be generated by the 100 year hurricane scenario event. The model breaks the debris into four general categories: brick/wood, reinforced concrete/steel, eligible tree debris, and other tree debris. This distinction is made because of the different types of material-handling equipment required to handle the debris. The model estimates that a total of 39,002 tons of debris will be generated. Of the total amount, brick/wood comprises 4.92 percent of the total, reinforced concrete/steel comprises 0.00 percent of the total, eligible tree debris comprises 16.72, and other tree debris is 78.36 percent of the total. Environment Flooding and wind damage are the main impacts that would be felt by a hurricane in Augusta-Richmond County. Please refer to the Flood Hazard Profile for a discussion on flood-related impacts and the Tornado Hazard Profile for a discussion on relevant wind-related impacts. 5.10 INFECTIOUS DISEASE 5.10.1 Background Communicable, or infectious, diseases are conditions that result in clinically evident illness which are transmissible directly from one person to another or indirectly through vectors such as insects, air, water, blood, or other objects. The impact of communicable disease can range from the mild effects of the common cold to the extreme lethality of pneumonic plague or anthrax. The public health system in the United States was developed in large part as a response to the often urgent need to respond to or prevent outbreaks of communicable diseases. Through public health methods of disease reporting, vaccinations, vector control, and effective treatments, most communicable diseases are well controlled in the United States and Augusta-Richmond County. However, control systems can fail and when people come together from locations outside of the county, state, and the country, outbreaks can occur, even SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:49 in the most modern of communities. In this section, some of the more significant potential communicable disease concerns are described. The threats discussed in this section usually do not occur on a regular basis, though some are more frequent. The diseases described herein do not originate from intentional exposure (such as through terrorist actions) but do present significant issues and concerns for the public health community. There are numerous infectious diseases that rarely, if ever, occur in Augusta-Richmond County, such as botulism or bubonic plague. Some highly dangerous diseases which could potentially be used as biological weapons, such as anthrax, pneumonic plague, and smallpox, are safely housed and controlled in laboratory settings such as at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Other diseases have not (yet) mutated into a form that can infect humans, or otherwise lie dormant in nature. There have been several significant viral outbreaks from emerging diseases in recent years of both national and international importance. The Zika virus and West Nile virus are viruses that are typically passed to humans or animals by mosquitoes and made major news as emergent disease threats. Meanwhile, diseases that are spread directly between human beings such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Ebola have also been identified as serious threats. While each of these conditions caused a great deal of public health concern when they were first identified, SARS has virtually disappeared, West Nile virus occurs with low frequency and causes serious disease in only a very small percentage of cases, Ebola has been more or less contained and a vaccine is in development, and many people infected with Zika will not experience symptoms from the disease. Other communicable diseases pose a much more frequent threat to the residents of Augusta-Richmond County. Some of the infectious diseases of greatest concern include influenza, particularly in a pandemic form, as well as norovirus, and multiple antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis. Even in one of its normal year- to-year variants, influenza (commonly referred to as “flu”) can result in serious illness and even death in young children, the elderly and immune-compromised persons. But there is always the potential risk of the emergence of influenza in one of the pandemic H1N1 forms, such as in the “Spanish Flu” outbreak of 1918-19, which killed over 50 million people worldwide. Every year, Augusta-Richmond County sees hundreds of cases of influenza, leading to hundreds of hours of lost productivity in businesses due to sick employees. Of note, a vaccine for influenza is produced every year and, according to the CDC, is highly effective in preventing the disease. Norovirus is recognized as the leading cause of foodborne-disease outbreaks in the United States. The virus can cause diarrhea, vomiting, and stomach pain, and is easily spread from person to person through contaminated food or water and by surface to surface contact. Especially vulnerable populations to this virus include those living or staying in nursing homes and assisted living facilities and other healthcare facilities such as hospitals. Norovirus could also be a threat in the event of large public gatherings such as sporting events, concerts, festivals, and so forth. Augusta-Richmond County and the State of Georgia often experience norovirus outbreaks on an annual basis. No vaccine or treatment exists for the Norovirus, making it especially dangerous for the public in the event of an outbreak. Public health threats can occur at any time and can have varying impacts. Discussions between public health professionals, planning officials, and first response agencies are essential in order to facilitate safe, effective, and collaborative efforts toward outbreaks. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:50 5.10.2 Location and Spatial Extent Due to the nature of a public health/emerging disease threat, it is difficult to identify a precise location where this type of event would occur. Moreover, a large-scale event would have impacts that spread throughout the county. Therefore, all areas in Augusta-Richmond County are considered equally susceptible to infectious diseases. 5.10.3 Historical Occurrences In 2003, the SARS outbreak that began in Southeast Asia began showing up in the United States. There were three confirmed case of SARS in Georgia in 2003. Since that time there have not been any reported cases of SARS.14 An outbreak of the West Nile Virus began showing up in the United States in 1999, with Georgia reporting 388 cases from that time through the end of 2016. No cases of Ebola were reported in the State of Georgia, though several locations in the United States did experience cases. A map showing the number of Zika cases reported in each state in 2016 can be found in Figure 5.19. According to the Centers for Disease Control, there were over 100 cases of Zika in the State of Georgia during this time. Although none of those cases were reported in Augusta-Richmond County, it is certainly possible that in the future, cases will be contracted within the county given that many neighboring areas have been impacted. FIGURE 5.19: NUMBER OF ZIKA CASES REPORTED IN 2016 BY STATE Source: Centers for Disease Control As stated previously, diseases like influenza and norovirus are regularly occurring health issues in Augusta-Richmond County. These conditions are not legally reportable to county or state public health agencies, so data on disease incidence is not readily available, although there were at least 2 cases of norovirus reported in the county, with one in 2011 and one in 2012. These diseases are monitored 14 https://www.cdc.gov/media/presskits/sars/cases.htm SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:51 through local epidemiological surveillance systems in hospitals and health departments and any potential outbreaks are investigated promptly. Finally, the Richmond County epidemiologist provided cumulative information on notifiable diseases reported over roughly the last 5 years (January 1, 2012 to November 8, 2016). This information shows that a majority of the notifiable diseases that impact the county are related to Hepaitits C or Salmonellosis. A full list of the notifiable diseases, the number of occurrences of each, and the percentage of total can be found in Figure 5.20. FIGURE 5.20: INCIDENCE OF NOTIFIABLE DISEASES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Richmond County Health Department During events involving outbreaks, as stated in Ga. Code § 31-2-1, the Department of Community Health and local County Board of Health are empowered to exercise quarantine and isolation authority. Quarantine and isolation authority shall be exercised with the understanding that those ordered into quarantine shall have access to legal representation and can challenge the order. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:52 5.10.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Due to some recent incidents that have been recorded across the State of Georgia and in Augusta- Richmond County, future occurrences are considered possible (between 1 and 10 percent annual probability). 5.10.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) The general public can be exposed to emerging diseases through different means based on the particular threat and its potential transmission routes. Vaccinations, when available, are the best means of preventing transmission and infection. Public Health information messages will be disseminated via the media in order to provide preventive measures to limit or avoid exposure. Public confidence in government and nongovernmental organizations may be impacted by public health outbreaks. The level of confidence the public possesses is based upon societal expectations, media influence, and past experience following other outbreaks. An effective response to the outbreak can help to guide public confidence toward a favorable level. Collaboration with media outlets can also assist in keeping the public informed and helping to protect them from exposure. Responders During a disease outbreak, responders can expect an increase in workload and should practice a higher level of precaution toward exposure than they would normally. Plans exist for first response and health care to address the needs of such situations. Communication between these agencies regarding plans and procedures maximizes the efficiency and effectiveness of these combined efforts. Continuity of Operations Continuity of operations may be impacted if those in governmental or other key roles are impacted by the disease or public health threat and cannot perform their normal duties. Although plans are in place to ensure continuity of operations, a large-scale event or one that has significant impacts on operational-level staff could negatively affect continuity of operations. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Building Stock Residential – There are no expected impacts. Commercial – There are no expected impacts. Industrial – There are no expected impacts. Hazardous Materials Facilities – There are no expected impacts. Critical Facilities and Personnel Hospitals – The primary impacts for hospitals during disease outbreaks are an increase in patients and the spread of disease within the hospitals. Emergency Services – Workload may be increased for emergency services as individuals infected with disease may require transport to a hospital facility or other forms of care. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:53 Emergency Shelters – There are no expected impacts, though officials monitoring and managing these facilities should be on higher guard against the spread of disease due to a concentrated aggregation of people in one location. Transportation Systems There are no expected impacts to Interstates/Airports/Rail Lines. Critical Utilities There are no expected impacts to High Voltage Distribution Lines, Power Lines, or Natural Gas Systems. Communication Systems and Networks There are no expected impacts to Telephone Systems, Cell Phone Towers, or Internet Capabilities. Economy Small/Local Employers – One of the more significant economic impacts that could be seen in Augusta- Richmond County involves absenteeism at local businesses which could have a significant impact as the absence of several employees at a small business could force temporary shutdowns or reduced hours of availability. There would also likely be an impact on the local government budget as officials try to respond to the disease and assist those impacted. Large Employers – If employees are affected, there may be some loss in productivity. Special Consideration Areas City Centers – There are no expected impacts, although city centers tend to be areas where large masses of people congregate and thus may be areas where the likelihood of disease spread is more prominent. Large Event Arenas – Events may have to be cancelled if the outbreak is large enough or has the potential to be spread easily and quickly. Historical and Cultural Landmarks – There are no expected impacts. Environment The environmental impact is dependent on the particular biological substance being transmittable to animal or plant life, or if it can be distributed through the water supply. 5.11 LIGHTNING 5.11.1 Background Lightning is a discharge of electrical energy resulting from the buildup of positive and negative charges within a thunderstorm, creating a “bolt” when the buildup of charges becomes strong enough. This flash of light usually occurs within the clouds or between the clouds and the ground. A bolt of lightning can reach temperatures approaching 50,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Lightning rapidly heats the sky as it flashes but the surrounding air cools following the bolt. This rapid heating and cooling of the surrounding air causes the thunder which often accompanies lightning strikes. While most often affiliated with severe thunderstorms, lightning may also strike outside of heavy rain and might occur as far as 10 miles away from any rainfall. Lightning strikes occur in very small, localized areas. For example, they may strike a building, electrical transformer, or even a person. According to FEMA, lightning injures an average of 300 people and kills SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:54 80 people each year in the United States. Direct lightning strikes also have the ability to cause significant damage to buildings, critical facilities, and infrastructure largely by igniting a fire. Lightning is also responsible for igniting wildfires that can result in widespread damages to property. Figure 5.21 shows a lightning flash density map for the years 2005-2014 based upon data provided by Vaisala’s U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN®). FIGURE 5.21: LIGHTNING FLASH DENSITY IN THE UNITED STATES Source: Vaisala United States National Lightning Detection Network 5.11.2 Location and Spatial Extent Lightning occurs randomly, therefore it is impossible to predict where and with what frequency it will strike. It is assumed that all of Augusta-Richmond County is uniformly exposed to lightning. 5.11.3 Historical Occurrences According to the National Climatic Data Center, there has only been 1 recorded lightning event in Augusta-Richmond County since 1996.15 This event resulted in 3 injuries and almost $170,000 (2016 dollars) in damages.16 Detailed information on historical lightning events can be found in Table 5.27. 15 These lightning events are only inclusive of those reported by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) from 1996 through October 2016. It is certain that additional lightning events have occurred in Augusta-Richmond County. The State Fire Marshall’s office was also contacted for additional information but none could be provided. As additional local data becomes available, this hazard profile will be amended. 16 Adjusted dollar values were calculated based on the average Consumer Price Index for a given calendar year. This index value has been calculated every year since 1913. For 2016, the October 2016 monthly index was used. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:55 It is certain that more than one lightning event has impacted the county. Many of the reported events are those that caused damage, and it should be expected that damages are likely much higher for this hazard than what is reported. TABLE 5.27: HISTORICAL OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Date Deaths / Injuries Property Damage (2016)* Details Augusta-Richmond County AUGUSTA 7/17/2012 0/3 $167,703 Lightning struck the roof of SunBelt Auto Center in Augusta. The lightning rippled through the interior of the facility injuring a few people. Then the wind blew out the cracked windows. Ken Harris, the general manager, was blead out of his arm and a little bit on his head. Harris said he couldn't believe the devastation. Blythe None Reported -- -- -- -- Fort Gordon None Reported -- -- -- -- Hephzibah None Reported -- -- -- -- *Property damage is reported in 2016 dollars; all damage may not have been reported. Source: National Climatic Data Center There have been several recent events reported by local media that were deemed to be important enough to include in the plan and these are described below. As mentioned above, this likely does not include all lightning events that have impacted the county. August 17, 2010: Two separate lightning strikes injured a 14-year-old girl (in Hephzibah) and 19-year-old boy (in Augusta). July 17, 2013: Lightning struck a transformer at South Richmond County substation, resulting in a power outage for 650 customers in southern Richmond County and northern Burke County. June 4, 2015: Lightning started a house fire in Augusta, no injuries and minor damage to house were reported. 5.11.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Although there was not a large number of historical lightning events reported throughout Augusta- Richmond County via NCDC data, it is considered a regular occurrence, especially accompanied by thunderstorms. In fact, lightning events will assuredly happen on an annual basis, though not all events will cause damage. According to Vaisala’s U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN®), Augusta- SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:56 Richmond County is located in an area of the country that experienced an average of 2 to 8 lightning flashes per square kilometer per year between 2005 and 2014. Therefore, the probability of future events is highly likely (100 percent annual probability). It can be expected that future lightning events will continue to threaten life and cause minor property damages throughout the county. 5.11.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Although relatively rare when compared to other hazards, the impacts of lightning on people can be severe, resulting in death or severe injury if a person is struck. Fatalities and injuries from lightning events most often occur when a person is exposed and in outdoor conditions during a thunderstorm. Exposure to water and open areas also increases the likelihood that a person will be struck. Lightning generally has a low probability of impacting public confidence. Responders Although responders are generally aware of the effects of lightning and take precautions to avoid being impacted by a lightning strike, it is possible that they could be struck. Moreover, taking the necessary precautions to avoid a lightning strike can often reduce response times as staying inside and away from lightning is the best way to avoid injury from the hazard. Continuity of Operations Lightning Most critical facilities and infrastructure are protected against lightning via surge protectors and lightning rods. However, if lightning were to shut down large parts of the power grid due to blowing a transformer, operations would be detrimentally impacted. In general, however, continuity of operations during a lightning event would not be affected as most critical operations centers have backup power systems. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Lightning generally does not have a major impact on property, facilities, or infrastructure. However, it has been known to affect power and energy sources through strikes which can shut down power for hours and sometimes days. Lightning is also responsible for igniting wildfires that can result in widespread damage to property. Economy Since lightning events generally pass through the area quickly and cause relatively little property damage when compared to other hazards, effects on the economy will likely be minimal. Nevertheless, if power-related infrastructure is damaged, this could cause some economic strain to replace and get the system back to full capacity. Environment The environmental effects of lightning are relatively minimal, although lightning has been known to cause wildfires which can lead to widespread damage to ecosystems. For more details on these impacts, please see this section of the wildfire hazard. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:57 5.12 SEVERE WINTER STORM 5.12.1 Background A winter storm can range from a moderate snow over a period of a few hours to blizzard conditions with blinding wind-driven snow that lasts for several days. Events may include snow, sleet, freezing rain, or a mix of these wintry forms of precipitation. Some winter storms might be large enough to affect several states, while others might affect only localized areas. Occasionally, heavy snow might also cause significant property damages, such as roof collapses on older buildings. All winter storm events have the potential to present dangerous conditions to the affected area. Snow Storms Larger snowfalls pose a great risk, reducing visibility due to blowing snow and making driving conditions treacherous. A heavy snow event is defined by the National Weather Service as an accumulation of 4 or more inches in 12 hours or less. A blizzard is the most severe form of winter storm. It combines low temperatures, heavy snow, and winds of 35 miles per hour or more, which reduces visibility to a quarter mile or less for at least 3 hours. Snow storms are often accompanied by sleet, freezing rain, or an ice storm. These combined events are particularly hazardous as they create treacherous surfaces. Ice Storms Ice storms, which are much more common in Augusta-Richmond County than snow storms, are defined as storms with significant amounts of freezing rain and are a result of cold air damming (CAD). CAD is a shallow, surface-based layer of relatively cold, stably-stratified air entrenched against the eastern slopes of the Appalachian Mountains. With warmer air above, falling precipitation in the form of snow melts, then becomes either super-cooled (liquid below the melting point of water) or re-freezes. In the former case, super-cooled droplets can freeze on impact (freezing rain), while in the latter case, the re-frozen water particles are ice pellets (or sleet). Sleet is defined as partially frozen raindrops or refrozen snowflakes that form into small ice pellets before reaching the ground. They typically bounce when they hit the ground and do not stick to the surface. However, it does accumulate like snow, posing similar problems and has the potential to accumulate into a layer of ice on surfaces. Freezing rain, conversely, usually sticks to the ground, creating a sheet of ice on the roadways and other surfaces. All of the winter storm elements – snow, sleet, ice, etcetera – have the potential to cause significant hazard to a community. Even small accumulations can down power lines and tree limbs and create hazardous driving conditions. Furthermore, communication and power may be disrupted for days. 5.12.2 Location and Spatial Extent Nearly the entire continental United States is susceptible to winter storm events. Some ice and winter storms may be large enough to affect several states, while others might affect limited, localized areas. The degree of exposure typically depends on the normal expected severity of local winter weather. Given the atmospheric nature of the hazard, the entire county has uniform exposure to a winter storm. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:58 5.12.3 Historical Occurrences Winter weather has resulted in one disaster declarations in Augusta-Richmond County (in 2014.)17 The National Climatic Data Center does not report winter storm events at the municipal level, however, there have been a total of 8 recorded winter storm events and in Augusta-Richmond County since 1996 (Table 5.28).18 Although NCDC did not record any damages from these events, there were certainly dollar losses that occurred that were not recorded.19 Detailed information on the recorded winter storm events can be found in Table 5.29. TABLE 5.28: SUMMARY OF WINTER STORM EVENTS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Occurrences Deaths / Injuries Property Damage (2016) Augusta-Richmond County 8 0/1 $0 Source: National Climatic Data Center TABLE 5.29: HISTORICAL WINTER STORM EVENTS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Date Type of Storm Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* Augusta-Richmond County RICHMOND (ZONE) 1/2/2002 Winter Storm 0/0 $0 RICHMOND (ZONE) 1/26/2004 Ice Storm 0/0 $0 RICHMOND (ZONE) 12/26/2004 Ice Storm 0/0 $0 RICHMOND (ZONE) 1/29/2005 Ice Storm 0/0 $0 RICHMOND (ZONE) 2/12/2010 Winter Storm 0/0 $0 RICHMOND (ZONE) 1/10/2011 Winter Storm 0/0 $0 RICHMOND (ZONE) 1/28/2014 Heavy Snow 0/0 $0 RICHMOND (ZONE) 2/12/2014 Ice Storm 0/0 $0 *Property damage is reported in 2016 dollars; All damage may not have been reported. Source: National Climatic Data Center There have been several severe winter weather events in Augusta-Richmond County. The text below describes two of the major events (one snow and one ice event) and associated impacts on the county. Similar impacts can be expected with most severe winter weather. January 2011 Winter Storm – January 10, 2011 A low pressure system moved through the Gulf of Mexico and across northern Florida producing snow, sleet and freezing rain across the southeast U.S. Heavy snow fell across the CSRA and lower Midlands of South Carolina with accumulations of 1 to 6 inches. 17 A complete listing of historical disaster declarations can be found in Section 4: Hazard Identification. 18 These ice and winter storm events are only inclusive of those reported by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) from 1996 through October 2016. It is likely that additional winter storm conditions have affected Augusta-Richmond County. 19 Adjusted dollar values were calculated based on the average Consumer Price Index for a given calendar year. This index value has been calculated every year since 1913. For 2016, the October 2016 monthly index was used. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:59 February 2014 Ice Storm – February 12, 2014 A major Ice Storm produced 3/4 to 1 inch of ice and 1 to 2 inches of snow and sleet across Richmond County taking down numerous trees and powerlines. Power outages were widespread across the county affecting most of the population. I-535 and other highways were closed due to the ice accumulations. Winter storms throughout the planning area have several negative externalities including hypothermia, cost of snow and debris cleanup, business and government service interruption, traffic accidents, and power outages. Furthermore, citizens may resort to using inappropriate heating devices that could to fire or an accumulation of toxic fumes. 5.12.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Winter storm events will likely remain a fairly regular occurrence in Augusta-Richmond County. According to historical information, Augusta-Richmond County generally experiences some type of winter weather during many winters. Therefore, the annual probability is likely (between 10 and 100 percent). 5.12.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Winter storms most often impact people indirectly. Winter storms can create dangerous driving conditions by limiting visibility for drivers or creating slick conditions that make maneuverability difficult. Loss of power can create very cold conditions for residents, making it difficult to stay warm. Residents may try to heat their home using alternative means, which runs the risk of carbon monoxide poisoning caused by improperly ventilated heating sources. In addition, dangerously cold temperatures increase the risk of wind chill, frostbite, and hypothermia. Winter storms generally do not have a large impact on public confidence, but it could be impacted if road clearing or response operations are slow. Responders Responders in winter storm and freeze events face a variety of hazards themselves including slick or icy roads that could cause harm if they are attempting to quickly respond to an emergency as is often the case. Crashed emergency vehicles and injuries to responders are always a possibility, but their chances increase during a winter storm event. Winter storms can also make it difficult to access more rural areas if roads are snowed/iced over and vehicles cannot pass through. Continuity of Operations Generally, continuity of operations can be maintained during a winter storm event in Augusta-Richmond County. However, winter storms do have the potential to affect power transmission and can make it difficult for emergency management employees to arrive to work. As a result, there may be some disruption of operations during a winter storm event. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Schools Winter storms have the potential to impact public and private school schedules through closings and delays. Poor driving conditions, lack of power and heat, and mechanical problems with school buses and equipment due to cold weather conditions are potential concerns. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:60 School closures and delays can lead to logistical problems for teachers and school administrators, especially in the event of end-of-term exams and standardized testing schedules. It can also result in logistical problems for making up school days. Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Winter storms have the potential to create hazardous driving conditions leading to accidents on roadways. The Federal Highway Administration reports that 24 percent of weather–related vehicle crashes occur on snowy, slushy, or icy pavement.20 Accidents can cause highways to become the equivalent of large parking lots which may cause motorists to strand their vehicles, making it difficult for emergency workers to reach those who need assistance. In general, major and local roadways become severely impacted when temperatures drop, making pre-treatment solutions ineffective. Transportation impacts can be minimized during early- and late-season events when paved surfaces are able to warm sufficiently to prevent winter precipitation accumulation. Winter storms can also result in delays and cancellations of flights at airports in Augusta-Richmond County due to slick conditions on runways. There is also the potential of a loss of power that can close the airport. Utilities One of the primary identified impacts of winter storms on Augusta-Richmond County is the disruption of utilities. Utilities that are at risk of being affected include telephone, internet, cable, and water. Newspaper reports typically cite trees falling on electrical wires—as well as trees that have already been damaged from previous incidents that fall during a winter storm—or the stress caused by ice accumulation as main causes for power outages. Economy In the event of a winter storm, there is a high potential of business and office closures, modified business and office hours, and cancellation or postponement of sporting and other planned events in the county. This can be contributed to poor road conditions (including icy and slick conditions) that result in fewer people using the roads to get to their destination or a loss of power and heat that result in a loss of operations at specific facilities. Environment Winter storms have an impact on the environment through the clearing of roadways. Snow on the roads can pick up contaminants from chemicals and oil products in traffic as well as the salt mixture that is used to de-ice the roads. These contaminants can be carried to nearby waterways which contaminates water sources and is absorbed by groundwater. In addition, vegetation can be damaged by these storm types. Vegetation destruction reduces available habitats, and threatens wildlife. 20 Federal Highway Administration. Snow and Ice. Retrieved January 3, 2017, from http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/weather/weather_events/snow_ice.htm SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:61 5.13 SOLAR FLARE/EMP 5.13.1 Background According to NOAA, a solar flare is a large outburst of electromagnetic radiation from the Sun that can last from mere minutes to several hours. They are caused by large scale eruptions of magnetic flux known as coronal mass ejections (CMEs). These CMEs cause X-rays and extreme ultraviolet light to ionize in the Earth’s atmosphere and impact the day-side of the planet by enhancing the absorption power of the ionosphere. In normal conditions, the ionosphere reflects radio waves, which allows for long distance radio communication without having a clear line-of-sight between the transmitter and the receiver. However, when the absorption power of the ionosphere is enhanced by the activities of a solar flare, nearly all radio waves are absorbed and radio communication is reduced or impossible. These types of events are often referred to as radio blackouts and can have a drastic impact on communications, especially for emergency services officials who rely on radio communication. In addition, these events can disrupt GPS navigation systems, airline communications, military and environmental satellites, and electrical power grids.21 Solar flares are classified physically on a logarithmic scale that increases in intensity by 10 times at each new level. The scale is based on the intensity of the flare in a 1 minute averaged NOAA/GOES XRS instrument’s 0.1-0.8 nm spectral band. The scale measures five levels of intensity with “A” flares as the least intense, followed by “B” flares, “C” flares, “M” flares, and “X” flares as the largest. The naming scale corresponds with descriptors for each event: “C” flares are considered to be “Common,” “M” flares are “Medium,” and “X” flares are “Extreme.” In addition to the physical classification of the solar flare itself, NOAA has also developed a five-level scale to classify the radio blackout itself. Table 5.30 shows the radio blackout scale and provides descriptions of the typical solar flare intensity that is associated with each scale of radio blackout. TABLE 5.30: NOAA RADIO BLACKOUT SCALE Scale Description Effect Physical measure Average Frequency (1 cycle = 11 years) R 5 Extreme HF Radio: Complete HF (high frequency) radio blackout on the entire sunlit side of the Earth lasting for a number of hours. This results in no HF radio contact with mariners and en route aviators in this sector. Navigation: Low-frequency navigation signals used by maritime and general aviation systems experience outages on the sunlit side of the Earth for many hours, causing loss in positioning. Increased satellite navigation errors in positioning for several hours on the sunlit side of Earth, which may spread into the night side. X20 (2 x 10-3) Less than 1 per cycle 21 NOAA. The Serendipitous Discovery of Solar Flares. http://www.noaa.gov/features/02_monitoring/1859solarstorm.html SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:62 Scale Description Effect Physical measure Average Frequency (1 cycle = 11 years) R 4 Severe HF Radio: HF radio communication blackout on most of the sunlit side of Earth for one to two hours. HF radio contact lost during this time. Navigation: Outages of low-frequency navigation signals cause increased error in positioning for one to two hours. Minor disruptions of satellite navigation possible on the sunlit side of Earth. X10 (10-3) 8 per cycle (8 days per cycle) R 3 Strong HF Radio: Wide area blackout of HF radio communication, loss of radio contact for about an hour on sunlit side of Earth. Navigation: Low-frequency navigation signals degraded for about an hour. X1 (10-4) 175 per cycle (140 days per cycle) R 2 Moderate HF Radio: Limited blackout of HF radio communication on sunlit side, loss of radio contact for tens of minutes. Navigation: Degradation of low-frequency navigation signals for tens of minutes. M5 (5 x 10-5) 350 per cycle (300 days per cycle) R 1 Minor HF Radio: Weak or minor degradation of HF radio communication on sunlit side, occasional loss of radio contact. Navigation: Low-frequency navigation signals degraded for brief intervals. M1 (10-5) 2000 per cycle (950 days per cycle) Source: NOAA 5.13.2 Location and Spatial Extent Because these events occur on a global scale and could have wide-ranging impacts on the entire dayside of the planet simultaneously, all areas of the county are considered to be equally susceptible to a solar flare. 5.13.3 Historical Occurrences There is a relatively extensive history of solar flares being observed in the United States, but the first observation of a solar flare was in England in 1859 when Richard Carrington observed what is still considered the largest solar flare in recorded history. This event, now known as the Carrington event, was a critical discovery as it connected solar flares with many of the impacts that we recognize they cause today. In the direct aftermath of Carrington’s discovery, the Earth was engulfed in a magnetic storm that created auroras all over the sky, caused compass needles to spin uncontrollably, and prevented telegraph operators from sending messages. These early observations of impacts from solar flares would lay the groundwork for recognizing future impacts from solar flare events such as the disruption of communications systems and electrical power. Although there has not been another solar flare on the magnitude of the Carrington event in the last 150 years, there have been a number of large events that have impacted various areas of the country and the world. Several of these events are described below and it should be noted that since solar flares could have effects anywhere in the world, similar impacts could be expected in Randolph County. August 4, 1972: A major solar storm reportedly caused a voltage surge on telephone lines in Illinois as reported by AT&T. This resulted in a temporary shutdown of communications lines for around 30 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:63 minutes. This was one of the first storms that scientists were able to predict with some degree of accuracy. March 13, 1989: Known as the Quebec Blackout Storm, this event knocked out power to the electric grid of the Hydro-Quebec Power Authority. Roughly six million people were impacted as they lost electricity and thus, in many cases, their source of heat. Power companies restored power within about 9 hours, but the event was considered very close to a large-scale disaster. July 14, 2000: The Bastille Day Flare was an X5.7 class flare that was the largest on record since the 1989 event. This event was considered probably the most well-observed solar flare event on record and helped astronomers better understand the causes of solar flares and the sun’s cycle of activity. 5.13.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Based on historic observations of major events and the knowledge of the Sun’s roughly eleven year cycle of activity, a major solar flare event that has impacts on Earth is considered likely (between 10 and 100 percent annual probability). 5.13.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) The entire Augusta-Richmond County population is vulnerable to the impacts of a solar flare/EMP regardless of the measured magnitude, although most low-classification events will not have any noticeable impact on the daily lives of people. If a large event were to occur and cause widespread power outages or communications systems disruptions, there may be a panic and people may temporarily be unable to undertake normal activities such as cooking or using mobile devices. Tornadoes often have some significant likelihood of affecting public confidence due to their highly visible impacts and the fact that most members of the public are unaware of the hazard and may be confused about the cause of loss of power/communications systems. Responders Responders could be critically affected by a solar flare/EMP event as response personnel rely heavily on communications equipment to carry out their normal operations. If a large event were to occur that knocked out communications equipment for several hours or possibly more than a day, this would be significantly hinder responders’ abilities to perform their duties. Continuity of Operations Continuity of operations would potentially be impacted in many ways by a major solar flare/EMP. As mentioned above, if communications equipment were disrupted, it would be challenging for government officials to coordinate with one another and respond to the citizen needs such as emergency medical care. Additionally, if power were lost, there would be a disruption to normal operations, though there are generally plans in place to maintain continuity of operations in this case as several operations centers have backup power systems. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:64 Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Critical Infrastructure The primary impact on the built environment from a solar flare/EMP would be on communications and power infrastructure. Most of the built environment (e.g. homes, buildings, roadways) would not be impacted in any way by this type of event. However, if power or communications systems are damaged or temporarily shut down, some aspects of the built environment will be impacted such as traffic lights, street lights, cell phone towers. Economy A solar flare/EMP can impact any area of Augusta-Richmond County at any time and may bring with it an interruption of service for local businesses as well as government that lose power or cannot utilize communications systems. As a result, there will be significant disruption of the local economy as long as the effects (such as power or communications loss) of the solar flare/EMP remain in place. Environment There will likely be relatively minimal impacts on the environment from a solar flare/EMP. 5.14 TORNADO 5.14.1 Background A tornado is a violent windstorm characterized by a twisting, funnel-shaped cloud extending to the ground. Tornadoes are most often generated by thunderstorm activity (but sometimes result from hurricanes and other tropical storms) when cool, dry air intersects and overrides a layer of warm, moist air forcing the warm air to rise rapidly. The damage caused by a tornado is a result of the high wind velocity and wind-blown debris, also accompanied by lightning or large hail. According to the National Weather Service, tornado wind speeds normally range from 40 miles per hour to more than 300 miles per hour. The most violent tornadoes have rotating winds of 250 miles per hour or more and are capable of causing extreme destruction and turning normally harmless objects into deadly missiles. Each year, an average of over 800 tornadoes is reported nationwide, resulting in an average of 80 deaths and 1,500 injuries.22 According to the NOAA Storm Prediction Center (SPC), the highest concentration of tornadoes in the United States has been in Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, and Florida respectively. Although the Great Plains region of the Central United States does favor the development of the largest and most dangerous tornadoes (earning the designation of “tornado alley”), Florida experiences the greatest number of tornadoes per square mile of all U.S. states (SPC, 2002). Figure 5.22 shows tornado activity in the United States based on the number of recorded tornadoes per 1,000 square miles. 22 NOAA, 2009. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:65 FIGURE 5.22: TORNADO ACTIVITY IN THE UNITED STATES Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency Tornadoes are more likely to occur during the months of March through May and are most likely to form in the late afternoon and early evening. Most tornadoes are a few dozen yards wide and touch down briefly, but even small short-lived tornadoes can inflict tremendous damage. Highly destructive tornadoes may carve out a path over a mile wide and several miles long. The destruction caused by tornadoes ranges from light to inconceivable depending on the intensity, size, and duration of the storm. Typically, tornadoes cause the greatest damage to structures of light construction, including residential dwellings (particularly mobile homes). Tornadic magnitude is reported according to the Fujita and Enhanced Fujita Scales. Tornado magnitudes prior to 2005 were determined using the traditional version of the Fujita Scale (Table 5.31). Tornado magnitudes that were determined in 2005 and later were determined using the Enhanced Fujita Scale (Table 5.32). SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:66 TABLE 5.31: THE FUJITA SCALE (EFFECTIVE PRIOR TO 2005) F-SCALE NUMBER INTENSITY WIND SPEED TYPE OF DAMAGE DONE F0 GALE TORNADO 40–72 MPH Some damage to chimneys; breaks branches off trees; pushes over shallow-rooted trees; damages to sign boards. F1 MODERATE TORNADO 73–112 MPH The lower limit is the beginning of hurricane wind speed; peels surface off roofs; mobile homes pushed off foundations or overturned; moving autos pushed off the roads; attached garages may be destroyed. F2 SIGNIFICANT TORNADO 113–157 MPH Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; mobile homes demolished; boxcars pushed over; large trees snapped or uprooted; light object missiles generated. F3 SEVERE TORNADO 158–206 MPH Roof and some walls torn off well-constructed houses; trains overturned; most trees in forest uprooted. F4 DEVASTATING TORNADO 207–260 MPH Well-constructed houses leveled; structures with weak foundations blown off some distance; cars thrown and large missiles generated. F5 INCREDIBLE TORNADO 261–318 MPH Strong frame houses lifted off foundations and carried considerable distances to disintegrate; automobile sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100 meters; trees debarked; steel re-enforced concrete structures badly damaged. F6 INCONCEIVABLE TORNADO 319–379 MPH These winds are very unlikely. The small area of damage they might produce would probably not be recognizable along with the mess produced by F4 and F5 wind that would surround the F6 winds. Missiles, such as cars and refrigerators would do serious secondary damage that could not be directly identified as F6 damage. If this level is ever achieved, evidence for it might only be found in some manner of ground swirl pattern, for it may never be identifiable through engineering studies. Source: National Weather Service SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:67 TABLE 5.32: THE ENHANCED FUJITA SCALE (EFFECTIVE 2005 AND LATER) EF-SCALE NUMBER INTENSITY PHRASE 3 SECOND GUST (MPH) TYPE OF DAMAGE DONE EF0 GALE 65–85 Some damage to chimneys; breaks branches off trees; pushes over shallow-rooted trees; damages to sign boards. EF1 MODERATE 86–110 The lower limit is the beginning of hurricane wind speed; peels surface off roofs; mobile homes pushed off foundations or overturned; moving autos pushed off the roads; attached garages may be destroyed. EF2 SIGNIFICANT 111–135 Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; mobile homes demolished; boxcars pushed over; large trees snapped or uprooted; light object missiles generated. EF3 SEVERE 136–165 Roof and some walls torn off well-constructed houses; trains overturned; most trees in forest uprooted. EF4 DEVASTATING 166–200 Well-constructed houses leveled; structures with weak foundations blown off some distance; cars thrown and large missiles generated. EF5 INCREDIBLE Over 200 Strong frame houses lifted off foundations and carried considerable distances to disintegrate; automobile sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100 meters; trees debarked; steel re-enforced concrete structures badly damaged. Source: National Weather Service 5.14.2 Location and Spatial Extent Tornadoes occur throughout the State of Georgia, and thus in Augusta-Richmond County. Tornadoes typically impact a relatively small area, but damage may be extensive. Event locations are completely random and it is not possible to predict specific areas that are more susceptible to tornado strikes over time. Therefore, it is assumed that Augusta-Richmond County is uniformly exposed to this hazard. With that in mind, Figure 5.23 shows tornado track data for many of the major tornado events that have impacted the county. While no definitive pattern emerges from this data, some areas that have been impacted in the past may be potentially more susceptible in the future. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:68 FIGURE 5.23: HISTORICAL TORNADO TRACKS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: NOAA 5.14.3 Historical Occurrences According to the National Climatic Data Center, there have been a total of 10 recorded tornado events in Augusta-Richmond County since 1950 (Table 5.33), resulting in $16.4 million (2016 dollars) in property damages.23 24 In addition, one death and five injuries were reported (Table 5.34). The magnitude of these tornadoes ranges from EF0 to EF3 in intensity, although an EF4 or EF5 event is possible. It is important to note that only tornadoes that have been reported are factored into this risk assessment. It is likely that a high number of occurrences have gone unreported over the past 65 years. 23 These tornado events are only inclusive of those reported by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) from 1950 through October 2016. It is likely that additional tornadoes have occurred in Augusta-Richmond County. As additional local data becomes available, this hazard profile will be amended. 24 Adjusted dollar values were calculated based on the average Consumer Price Index for a given calendar year. This index value has been calculated every year since 1913. For 2016, the October 2016 monthly index was used. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:69 TABLE 5.33: SUMMARY OF TORNADO OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Occurrences Deaths / Injuries Property Damage (2016) Augusta-Richmond County 7 0/14 $10,799,728 Blythe 0 0/0 $0 Fort Gordon 1 0/12 $5,608,520 Hephzibah 2 0/0 $10,698 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 10 0/26 $16,418,946 Source: National Climatic Data Center TABLE 5.34: HISTORICAL TORNADO OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Date Magnitude Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage* Details Augusta-Richmond County RICHMOND CO. 8/17/1954 F1 0/0 $223,650 -- RICHMOND CO. 2/24/1961 F1 0/0 $201,210 -- RICHMOND CO. 5/8/1978 F1 0/0 $9,227,262 -- RICHMOND CO. 4/23/1983 F0 0/0 $604,034 -- RICHMOND CO. 1/29/1990 F2 0/6 $460,304 A tornado blew down trees from Oak Ridge to Stokesdale. AUGUSTA 5/19/1993 F0 0/0 $83,269 A short lived tornado touched down on old trail road along the Richmond- Columbia county line. One home and two cars were damaged by toppled trees. AUGUSTA 12/17/2000 F2 0/8 $0 An F2 tornado intermittently touched down along a 2 mile path. Extensive damage was done to the Timberidge subdivision and to other homes and mobile homes along its path. Eight people were injurred, one seriously. There were no deaths. Blythe None Reported -- -- -- -- -- Fort Gordon FT GORDON 4/10/2009 EF3 0/12 $5,608,520 A supercell tornado continued out of Columbia county and tracked across the Augusta area severely damaging many homes and business and taking down numerous trees and powerlines. One hundred and fifty people had to be evacuated from a nursing home that was damaged and there were around a dozen minor injuries. Hephzibah HEPHZIBAH 6/12/2001 F0 0/0 $0 WAGT TV and others reported a small tornado touchdown at Point South golf course taking down several trees. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:70 Date Magnitude Deaths/ Injuries Property Damage* Details HEPHZIBAH 11/16/2011 EF0 0/0 $10,698 WRDW reported a tornado touchdown near Hephzibah taking down trees in rural areas east of Hephzibah. Photo attached. *Property damage is reported in 2016 dollars; All damage may not have been reported. Source: National Climatic Data Center 5.14.4 Probability of Future Occurrences According to historical information, tornado events are not an annual occurrence for the county. However, given the county’s location in the southeastern United States and history of tornadoes, an occurrence is possible every few years. While the majority of the reported tornado events are small in terms of size, intensity, and duration, they do pose a significant threat should Augusta-Richmond County experience a direct tornado strike. Tornado events are likely to increase in frequency as a result of climate change for reasons similar to those explained in the sub-section of this plan on the thunderstorm/windstorm hazard. The probability of future tornado occurrences affecting Augusta- Richmond County is likely (between 10 and 100 percent annual probability). 5.14.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) The entire Augusta-Richmond County population is vulnerable to the impacts of a tornado regardless of the measured magnitude. Because it cannot be predicted where a tornado will touch down, it cannot be said which areas of the population within the county are most vulnerable. However, injuries as well as deaths resulting from tornadoes are the most significant impacts. Tornadoes often have a high likelihood of affecting public confidence due to their destructive and highly visible impacts. Responders Responders could be critically affected by tornado events as the onset is often very rapid and unpredictable, thereby putting response personnel potentially in harm’s way. Due to the unpredictability of such events, response may also be hindered as responders may be unable to access those that have been affected if storm conditions persist and they are unable to safely enter affected areas. Continuity of Operations Continuity of operations could be greatly impacted by a tornado as personnel may be harmed and critical resources damaged or destroyed during a tornado. In many ways, since the impacts of a tornado are unpredictable, it is also difficult to predict and plan for the appropriate ways to ensure a continuity of operations. Although Augusta-Richmond County is prepared for such an event, disruption of operations will likely take place to some degree. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Building Inventory Augusta-Richmond County has been impacted by tornadoes ranging in intensity from EF0 through EF3 based on the Enhanced-Fujita scale. Because it cannot be predicted where a tornado may touch down, SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:71 all buildings, facilities, and infrastructure within the county are considered exposed to the hazard and at risk for being impacted. Wind Building materials play a role in how well a structure can withstand tornado force winds. Buildings that use structural steel, reinforced concrete, or load-bearing masonry have the best chance of withstanding a tornado event in the county. Homes constructed of wood or manufactured material are most at risk. Non-engineered structures in the county are far more vulnerable than engineered buildings to damage from tornado winds. Critical Facilities and Key Resources All critical facilities and key resources are equally vulnerable to the impacts of a tornado. The magnitude of the tornado will determine the extent of damage and impacts that are felt throughout the county. These impacts can include structural failure, debris damage, and loss of facility functionality. Critical Infrastructure The county’s infrastructure system is equally vulnerable to the impacts of a tornado. This includes critical infrastructure such as roads, railroads, bridges, utilities (power and gas), and pipelines. Any number of these infrastructure systems could be damaged in the event of a tornado, although often power lines are the most common assets that are affected during a tornado. Impacts could include structural damage, impassable or blocked roadways, failed utility lines, railway failure, and impassable bridges. Key Resources The county’s key resources are equally vulnerable to the impacts of a tornado. Any number of key resources could be damaged or lost in the event of a tornado. Impacts could include structural damage, and loss of power and utilities. Economy A tornado can impact any area of Augusta-Richmond County at any time and brings with it significant property damage costs to individual citizens and the regular functioning of the local economy. After past events, there has been a substantial halt to many economic activities and losses to businesses have often been high. Environment Downed trees and other forms of vegetation are often one of the most visible impacts to the environment from a tornado. Additionally, building material or other debris can be carried or thrown great distances by the force of wind and end up spread out in unexpected places such as natural areas. Coordinated countywide cleanup efforts after a tornado can include removal of debris, but much debris ends up remaining in the local habitats. Finally, if hazardous materials facilities are impacted by the tornado, these may release dangerous chemicals into the environment that can cause long-term harm. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:72 5.15 WILDFIRE 5.15.1 Background A wildfire is any outdoor fire (i.e. grassland, forest, brush land) that is not under control, supervised, or prescribed.25 Wildfires are part of the natural management of forest ecosystems, but may also be caused by human factors. Nationally, over 80 percent of forest fires are started by negligent human behavior such as smoking in wooded areas or improperly extinguishing campfires. The second most common cause for wildfire is lightning. In Georgia, a majority of fires are caused by debris burning such as burning yard leaf piles. There are three classes of wildland fires: surface fire, ground fire, and crown fire. A surface fire is the most common of these three classes and burns along the floor of a forest, moving slowly and killing or damaging trees. A ground fire (muck fire) is usually started by lightning or human carelessness and burns on or below the forest floor. Crown fires spread rapidly by wind and move quickly by jumping along the tops of trees. Wildfires are usually signaled by dense smoke that fills the area for miles around. Wildfire probability depends on local weather conditions, outdoor activities such as camping, debris burning, and construction, and the degree of public cooperation with fire prevention measures. Drought conditions and other natural hazards (such as tornadoes, hurricanes, etc.) increase the probability of wildfires by producing fuel in both urban and rural settings. Many individual homes and cabins, subdivisions, resorts, recreational areas, organizational camps, businesses, and industries are located within high wildfire hazard areas. Furthermore, the increasing demand for outdoor recreation places more people in wildlands during holidays, weekends, and vacation periods. Unfortunately, wildland residents and visitors are rarely educated or prepared for wildfire events that can sweep through the brush and timber and destroy property within minutes. Wildfires can result in severe economic losses as well. Businesses that depend on timber, such as paper mills and lumber companies, experience losses that are often passed along to consumers through higher prices and sometimes jobs are lost. The high cost of responding to and recovering from wildfires can deplete state resources and increase insurance rates. The economic impact of wildfires can also be felt in the tourism industry if roads and tourist attractions are closed due to health and safety concerns. State and local governments can impose fire safety regulations on home sites and developments to help curb wildfire. Land treatment measures such as fire access roads, water storage, helipads, safety zones, buffers, firebreaks, fuel breaks, and fuel management can be designed as part of an overall fire defense system to aid in fire control. Fuel management, prescribed burning, and cooperative land management planning can also be encouraged to reduce fire hazards. 25 Prescription burning, or “controlled burn,” undertaken by land management agencies is the process of igniting fires under selected conditions, in accordance with strict parameters. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:73 5.15.2 Location and Spatial Extent The entire county is at risk to a wildfire occurrence. However, several factors such as drought conditions or high levels of fuel on the forest floor, may make a wildfire more likely. Furthermore, areas in the urban-wildland interface are particularly susceptible to fire hazard as populations abut formerly undeveloped areas. The Wildfire Ignition Density data shown in the figure below gives an indication of historic location in Augusta-Richmond County. 5.15.3 Historical Occurrences Figure 5.24 shows the Wildfire Ignition Density in Augusta-Richmond County based on data from the Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment. This data is based on historical fire ignitions and the likelihood of a wildfire igniting in an area. Occurrence is derived by modeling historic wildfire ignition locations to create an average ignition rate map. This is measured in the number of fires per year per 1,000 acres.26 FIGURE 5.24: WILDFIRE IGNITION DENSITY IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment 26 Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment, 2016. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:74 Based on data from the Georgia Forestry Commission (GFC) from 2007 to 2016, Augusta-Richmond County experienced an average of 34.6 wildfires annually which burn a combined average of 118.6 acres per year. The data indicates that most of these fires are small, averaging 3.4 acres per fire. Table 5.35 lists the number of reported wildfire occurrences in the county between the years 2007 and 2016. TABLE 5.35: HISTORICAL WILDFIRE OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* Augusta-Richmond County Number of Fires 42 47 37 23 51 36 27 30 32 21 Number of Acres 109 328 55 46 177 100 54 194 65 58 *Data collected only through October 11, 2016 Source: Georgia Forestry Commission 5.15.4 Probability of Future Occurrence Wildfire events will be an ongoing occurrence in Augusta-Richmond County. Figure 5.25 shows that there is some probability a wildfire will occur throughout the county. However, the likelihood of wildfires increases during drought cycles and abnormally dry conditions. Fires are likely to stay small in size but could increase due local climate and ground conditions. Dry, windy conditions with an accumulation of forest floor fuel (potentially due to ice storms or lack of fire) could create conditions for a large fire that spreads quickly. It should also be noted that some areas do vary somewhat in risk. For example, highly developed areas are less susceptible unless they are located near the urban-wildland boundary. The risk will also vary due to assets. Areas in the urban-wildland interface will have much more property at risk, resulting in increased vulnerability and need to mitigate compared to rural, mainly forested areas. The probability assigned to Augusta-Richmond County for future wildfire events is likely (between 10 and 100 percent annual probability). Additionally, as explained in the sub-section concerning drought, the increased likelihood of drought due to climate change will result in drier conditions that are more conducive to wildfires and, therefore, to greater structural/property damage and decreased air quality in the county. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:75 FIGURE 5.25: BURN PROBABILITY IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment 5.15.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) There are a number of losses related to people from a wildfire in Augusta-Richmond County. Potential losses include human life, structures, and natural resources. Health hazards from smoke caused by wildland fires within or outside the county include breathing difficulties and worsening of chronic breathing and/or cardiovascular disease. Smoke and air pollution pose a risk for children, the elderly, and those with respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Wildfire tends to create some issues with public confidence because of the very visible impacts that the fire has on the community. Responders Responders are often at great risk when addressing fires or wildfire, especially firefighters who are responsible for putting out the blaze. First responders are also at risk for exposure to dangers from the initial incident and after-effects such as smoke inhalation and/or heat stroke. All response personnel are potentially at risk when dealing with a wildfire and often-changing winds and a number of other factors can cause a fire to spread rapidly. Although much of Augusta-Richmond County has been urbanized and SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:76 is not at a high risk to wildfire, the more rural areas that are located in the wildland urban interface may require response personnel to be ready to act. Continuity of Operations Since wildfire often moves quickly and can affect infrastructure that is important to maintaining continuity of operations, there is some level of concern for maintaining continuity. However, operations in Augusta-Richmond County, which are generally run from urbanized areas, will probably not be impacted in a major way. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Wildland fires have the potential to substantially burn forested areas as well as private residences. Damage and destruction to state, county, private, and municipal structures and facilities are major losses that are attributed to wildland fires. Private residences and communities that are located within the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) are particularly susceptible to the threat. Population increases in the county’s WUI areas, for example, can create significant challenges for firefighters and residents. Many new homes are constructed without considering community wildland fire planning. This creates neighborhoods with limited accessibility and flammable building construction and landscaping. A lack of Firewise planning can also greatly increase the probability of a wildland fire occurrence with more homes and emergency personnel being threatened. Impacts to agricultural crops are another form of direct property losses that Augusta-Richmond County could face in the event of a wildland fire. Some structural losses might cause damage to private property including business properties and homes, vehicles, and livestock. Damage to capital goods and equipment as well as evacuation expenses and other losses are directly related to fire and smoke damage. Additional potential losses include building and landscape maintenance expenses, firefighting equipment purchases, and fire-related business closures. Post-fire losses include cleanup, rehabilitation and repair expenses, equipment and capital goods replacement, drinking water pollution, smoke damage, deflated real estate values, and an increase in fire insurance premiums. Economy Given the fact that some homes, businesses, and infrastructure are located in areas that could be impacted by wildfire, there could be some significant economic impacts of a wildfire in Augusta- Richmond County. If homes or businesses are burned, the cost of rebuilding could be substantial and loss of revenue as businesses rebuild would also impact the local economy. Environment Wildland fires have the potential to damage or destroy forage on grazing lands, secondary forest products destruction, and/or degradation and loss of wildlife habitat on public lands. On private lands, vegetation losses could include agricultural crops that are either burned or impacted by wildland fire smoke. Another potential loss includes damage and destruction to a wide variety of common or protected habitats in Augusta-Richmond County. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:77 5.16 WINDSTORM/THUNDERSTORM 5.16.1 Background Thunderstorms can produce a variety of accompanying hazards including wind (discussed here), hail, and lightning (discussed in separate sub-sections). Although thunderstorms generally affect a small area, they are very dangerous and may cause substantial property damage. Three conditions need to occur for a thunderstorm to form. First, it needs moisture to form clouds and rain. Second, it needs unstable air, such as warm air that can rise rapidly (this often referred to as the “engine” of the storm). Third, thunderstorms need lift, which comes in the form of cold or warm fronts, sea breezes, mountains, or the sun’s heat. When these conditions occur simultaneously, air masses of varying temperatures meet, and a thunderstorm is formed. These storm events can occur singularly, in lines, or in clusters. Furthermore, they can move through an area very quickly or linger for several hours. According to the National Weather Service, more than 100,000 thunderstorms occur each year, though only about 10 percent of these storms are classified as “severe.” A severe thunderstorm occurs when the storm produces at least one of these three elements: 1) hail at least one inch in diameter, 2) a tornado, or 3) winds of at least 58 miles per hour. Thunderstorm events have the capability of producing straight-line winds that can cause severe destruction to communities and threaten the safety of a population. Such wind events, sometimes separate from a thunderstorm event, are common throughout Augusta-Richmond County. Therefore, high winds are also reported in this section. High winds can form due to pressure of the Northeast coast of the United States that combines with strong pressure moving through the Ohio Valley. This creates a tight pressure gradient across the region, resulting in high winds which increase with elevation. Downbursts are also possible with thunderstorm events. Such events are an excessive burst of wind in excess of 125 miles per hour. They are often confused with tornadoes. Downbursts are caused by down drafts from the base of a convective thunderstorm cloud. It occurs when rain-cooled air within the cloud becomes heavier than its surroundings. Thus, air rushes towards the ground in a destructive yet isolated manner. There are two types of downbursts. Downbursts less than 2.5 miles wide, duration less than 5 minutes, and winds up to 168 miles per hour are called “microbursts.” Larger events greater than 2.5 miles at the surface and longer than 5 minutes with winds up to 130 miles per hour are referred to as “macrobursts.” 5.16.2 Location and Spatial Extent A wind event is an atmospheric hazard, and thus has no geographic boundaries. It is typically a widespread event that can occur in all regions of the United States. However, thunderstorms are most common in the central and southern states because atmospheric conditions in those regions are favorable for generating these powerful storms. Also, Augusta-Richmond County typically experiences several straight-line wind events each year. These wind events can and have caused significant damage. It is assumed that Augusta-Richmond County has uniform exposure to a thunderstorm/wind event and the spatial extent of an impact could be large. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:78 5.16.3 Historical Occurrences According to NCDC, there have been 182 reported thunderstorm wind and high wind events since 1950 in Augusta-Richmond County.27 These events caused almost $4.0 million (2016 dollars) in damages.28 There were also reports of one fatality and thirty-six injuries. Table 5.36 summarizes this information. Table 5.37 provides detailed thunderstorm wind and high wind event reports, including date, magnitude, and associated damages for each event. TABLE 5.36: SUMMARY OF THUNDERSTORM / HIGH WIND OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA- RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Occurrences Deaths / Injuries Property Damage (2016) Augusta-Richmond County 156 1/34 $3,789,359 Blythe 5 0/2 $22,998 Fort Gordon 9 0/0 $52,755 Hephzibah 12 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 182 1/36 $3,977,975 Source: National Climatic Data Center TABLE 5.37: HISTORICAL THUNDERSTORM / HIGH WIND OCCURRENCES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Date Type Magnitude† Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* Augusta-Richmond County RICHMOND CO. 5/22/1955 Thunderstorm Wind 58 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/24/1955 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/6/1955 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/29/1956 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/15/1956 Thunderstorm Wind 58 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/27/1956 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/11/1961 Thunderstorm Wind 65 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/3/1966 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/8/1967 Thunderstorm Wind 65 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/25/1968 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/8/1969 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/3/1970 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/16/1970 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/16/1970 Thunderstorm Wind 53 kts. 0/0 $0 27 These thunderstorm events are only inclusive of those reported by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) from 1950 through October 2016 and these high wind events are only inclusive of those reported by NCDC from 1996 through October 2016. It is likely that additional thunderstorm and high wind events have occurred in Augusta-Richmond County. As additional local data becomes available, this hazard profile will be amended. 28 Adjusted dollar values were calculated based on the average Consumer Price Index for a given calendar year. This index value has been calculated every year since 1913. For 2016, the October 2016 monthly index was used. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:79 Date Type Magnitude† Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* RICHMOND CO. 3/2/1972 Thunderstorm Wind 53 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 3/16/1972 Thunderstorm Wind 75 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/5/1972 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 3/21/1974 Thunderstorm Wind 58 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/7/1974 Thunderstorm Wind 57 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/16/1975 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/22/1977 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 10/2/1977 Thunderstorm Wind 54 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/19/1978 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/29/1978 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/29/1978 Thunderstorm Wind 54 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 10/4/1979 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/9/1980 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/26/1980 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/7/1980 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 3/16/1981 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/10/1981 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/12/1981 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 2/16/1982 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/26/1982 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/10/1982 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/23/1983 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/5/1983 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/5/1983 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/15/1983 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 8/24/1983 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/14/1984 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/14/1984 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/3/1984 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/22/1985 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/24/1988 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/30/1988 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 4/4/1989 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/5/1989 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 5/5/1989 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 2/10/1990 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 2/22/1990 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/1 $0 RICHMOND CO. 6/9/1990 Thunderstorm Wind 52 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 3/1/1991 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 7/12/1992 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 RICHMOND CO. 9/3/1992 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 Augusta 5/13/1993 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $8,327 Augusta 5/19/1993 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $8,327 Augusta 5/19/1993 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $83,269 McBean 6/26/1994 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $812 Augusta 6/28/1994 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $8,119 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:80 Date Type Magnitude† Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* Augusta 6/28/1994 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $8,119 Augusta 5/14/1995 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/4 $3,158 Richmond 6/9/1995 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 Augusta 6/12/1995 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $790 South Augusta 6/12/1995 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $28,423 Augusta 7/24/1995 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $790 Augusta 11/7/1995 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 Augusta 11/11/1995 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $0 WEST AUGUSTA 1/24/1996 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 GOESHEN 3/7/1996 Thunderstorm Wind 75 kts. 0/0 $3,067,521 AUGUSTA 5/28/1996 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 GRACEWOOD 4/22/1997 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. 0/0 $10,496 AUGUSTA 5/3/1997 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/19/1998 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 4/15/1999 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 8/23/1999 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 8/18/2000 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/3/2001 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/3/2001 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/22/2001 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 7/8/2001 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/3/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 70 kts. M 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/3/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 70 kts. M 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/3/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 COUNTYWIDE 5/13/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/29/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. E 0/1 $24,078 AUGUSTA 7/30/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 8/18/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 9/18/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 COUNTYWIDE 12/24/2002 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 2/22/2003 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. E 0/0 $0 CENTRAL PORTION 5/2/2003 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/18/2003 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 7/11/2003 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 11/19/2003 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/2/2004 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA BUSH ARPT 5/2/2004 Thunderstorm Wind 64 kts. MG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 4/22/2005 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/20/2005 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 8/4/2005 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 7/15/2006 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 7/20/2006 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 6/18/2007 Thunderstorm Wind 58 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 7/11/2007 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 1/4 $0 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:81 Date Type Magnitude† Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* AUGUSTA 3/4/2008 Thunderstorm Wind 70 kts. EG 0/0 $0 NATIONAL HILLS 3/15/2008 Thunderstorm Wind 61 kts. EG 0/0 $0 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 5/20/2008 Thunderstorm Wind 58 kts. MG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 5/20/2008 Thunderstorm Wind 65 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/22/2008 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 RICHMOND (ZONE) 1/7/2009 Strong Wind 43 kts. EG 0/0 $16,826 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 6/12/2009 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 6/18/2009 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $6,730 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 7/30/2009 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. MG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 8/11/2009 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $2,243 AUGUSTA 12/9/2009 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $4,487 AUGUSTA DANIEL ARPT 1/24/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $5,518 AUGUSTA 6/15/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $44,144 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 6/25/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $6,622 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 7/27/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. MG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 7/31/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $4,414 AUGUSTA 10/25/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA DANIEL ARPT 3/9/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $535 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 4/5/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 65 kts. EG 0/0 $72,749 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 4/5/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $1,070 BATH 4/28/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $19,257 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 4/28/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $40,654 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 6/15/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 58 kts. MG 0/24 $0 AUGUSTA 6/15/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $12,838 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 6/21/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 52 kts. EG 0/0 $0 ELWOOD 6/21/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $535 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 6/21/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $8,559 ARAGON PARK 6/28/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $4,279 ARAGON PARK 6/28/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 8/13/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. MG 0/0 $0 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 8/13/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $3,210 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 9/15/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 59 kts. MG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA DANIEL ARPT 10/13/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 NATIONAL HILLS 10/13/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA 2/24/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 70 kts. EG 0/0 $125,777 NATIONAL HILLS 4/3/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 NATIONAL HILLS 4/3/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:82 Date Type Magnitude† Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* NATIONAL HILLS 4/3/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 NATIONAL HILLS 4/3/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $0 NATIONAL HILLS 7/5/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $4,193 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 7/5/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $6,289 NATIONAL HILLS 8/9/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 8/9/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $524 SOUTH NELLIEVILLE 8/17/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $31,444 (AGS)BUSH FLD AUGUST 3/18/2013 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. MG 0/0 $0 DE BRUCE 1/11/2014 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $4,066 AUGUSTA DANIEL ARPT 11/23/2014 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $8,132 NIXON 6/22/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $48,735 NATIONAL HILLS 6/27/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $508 NATIONAL HILLS 7/2/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $28,429 AUGUSTA 7/20/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $24,368 AUGUSTA DANIEL ARPT 2/24/2016 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 Blythe BLYTHE 4/22/1997 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. 0/2 $22,490 BLYTHE 7/27/1997 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 BLYTHE 4/14/2007 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 BLYTHE 8/7/2008 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 BLYTHE 6/9/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $508 Fort Gordon FT GORDON 12/17/2001 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 7/22/2006 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 3/1/2007 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 6/18/2007 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 7/31/2008 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 FT GORDON 6/18/2009 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $39,260 FT GORDON 7/3/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 60 kts. EG 0/0 $5,241 FT GORDON 7/5/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $4,193 FT GORDON 6/27/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $4,061 Hephzibah Hephzibah 6/17/1994 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $8,119 Hephzibah 7/16/1995 Thunderstorm Wind 0 kts. 0/0 $947 HEPHZIBAH 4/22/1997 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. 0/0 $4,498 HEPHZIBAH 6/10/1998 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 9/8/1998 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 6/22/2000 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E 0/0 $5,444 HEPHZIBAH 2/13/2007 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 3/2/2007 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $0 HEPHZIBAH 4/5/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 65 kts. EG 0/0 $89,866 HEPHZIBAH 6/21/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $3,210 HEPHZIBAH 7/5/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0/0 $4,193 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:83 Date Type Magnitude† Deaths / Injuries Property Damage* HEPHZIBAH 4/19/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 55 kts. EG 0/0 $2,031 *Property damage is reported in 2016 dollars; All damage may not have been reported. †E = estimated; EG = estimated gust; ES = estimated sustained ;MG = measured gust ;MS = measured sustained Source: National Climatic Data Center 5.16.4 Probability of Future Occurrence Given the high number of previous events, it is certain that wind events, including straight-line wind and thunderstorm wind, will occur in the future. This results in a probability level of highly likely (100 percent annual probability) for future thunderstorm/wind events for the entire county. Additionally, according to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), thunderstorm events in the future are likely to become more frequent in the southeast as a result of climate change. Thunderstorm potential is measured by an index that NASA. Created that is called the Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) index. This measures how warm and moist the air is, which is a major contributing factor in thunderstorm formation. NASA projects that by the period of 2072-2099, the CAPE the southeastern United States will increase dramatically. Indeed, as Figure 5.26 shows, Augusta-Richmond County is in an area that will likely experience the greatest increase in CAPE in the United States. This indicates that there will potentially be even more frequent thunderstorms in the county going forward. FIGURE 5.26: CONVECTIVE AVAILABLE POTENTIAL ENERGY PROJECTED INCREASE BY 2072-2099 Source: National Aeronautics and Space Administration SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:84 5.16.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Windstorms/thunderstorms are generally associated with several other hazards such as high wind and flooding, the latter of which is caused by torrential rain. As such, the public could be impacted in a number of ways by a thunderstorm event. High wind can cause trees to fall and potentially result in injuries or death and rising floodwaters can lead to drowning or other serious injury. Although often not as severe as hurricanes or tornadoes, the impacts on the public from thunderstorms can be significant, especially in the long-term. However, the public confidence is usually not affected to a large degree as a result of thunderstorms. Responders Responders are not generally affected to any great degree by thunderstorm events, although it should be noted that they could be impacted in many of the same ways as the public. Otherwise, responders could be affected by road blockages caused by downed trees or floodwaters, which would ultimately reduce their response time. Continuity of Operations In general, continuity of operations during a thunderstorm event can be maintained. Thunderstorm events often affect power in much the same way as tornadoes and hurricanes, which ultimately may impact operations. However, thunderstorm events are typically not large enough to severely affect normal operations and their impacts are not wide enough to disrupt continuity of operations in Augusta- Richmond County. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Thunderstorms often have their greatest impact on the built environment as they can cause damage to homes via strong winds or flooding and will often impact facilities and infrastructure in the same way. Power losses often occur due to damage to power lines and roads can flood and cause damage as well. In fact, thunderstorms are often considered one of the greater hazards of concern for local communities even though any given event will cause relatively little damage, because damaging events occur so frequently. Economy Economic impacts from thunderstorm events can often be far reaching as the damage from these events are often widespread, affecting both homes and businesses. This damage can result in business and economic disruption through the recovery process. Environment Thunderstorms can impact crops via high wind and flooding and can also impact the natural environment through these elements. Flooding can kill plants and animals as well as contaminate drinking water supplies for human populations. High wind can harm forests by bringing down trees and cause fires from downed power lines that impact the environment. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:85 Technological/Man-Made Hazards 5.17 CHEMICAL HAZARD 5.17.1 Background Hazardous materials can be found in many forms and quantities that can potentially cause death; serious injury; long-lasting health effects; and damage to buildings, homes, and other property in varying degrees. Such materials are routinely used and stored in many homes and businesses and are also shipped daily on the nation’s highways, railroads, waterways, and pipelines. This subsection on the hazardous material hazard is intended to provide a general overview of the hazard. The threshold for identifying fixed and mobile sources of hazardous materials is limited to general information on rail, highway, and FEMA-identified fixed HAZMAT sites determined to be of greatest significance as appropriate for the purposes of this plan. Hazardous material (HAZMAT) incidents can apply to fixed facilities as well as mobile, transportation- related accidents in the air, by rail, on the nation’s highways, and on the water. These incidents can be further classified based on the state of the hazardous material; whether they consist of solid, liquid, and/or gaseous contaminants that are released from fixed or mobile containers. A HAZMAT incident can last hours to days and some chemicals can be corrosive or otherwise damaging over longer periods of time. In addition to the primary release, explosions and/or fires can result from a release, and contaminants can be extended beyond the initial area by persons, vehicles, water, wind, and possibly wildlife as well. HAZMAT incidents can also occur as a result of or in tandem with natural hazard events, such as floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, and earthquakes which, in addition to causing incidents, can also hinder response efforts. For example, flooding and hurricane events can lead to hazardous spills by causing flooded junkyards, disturbed cemeteries, deceased livestock, floating propane tanks, uncontrolled fertilizer spills, and a variety of other environmental pollutants that are of widespread toxological concern. Hazardous material incidents can include the spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, or disposing into the environment of a hazardous material, but exclude: (1) any release which results in exposure to poisons solely within the workplace with respect to claims which such persons may assert against the employer of such persons; (2) emissions from the engine exhaust of a motor vehicle, rolling stock, aircraft, vessel or pipeline pumping station engine; (3) release of source, byproduct, or special nuclear material from a nuclear incident; and (4) the normal application of fertilizer. 5.17.2 Location and Spatial Extent As a result of the 1986 Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides public information on hazardous materials. One facet of this program is to collect information from industrial facilities on the releases and transfers of certain toxic agents. This information is then reported in the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI). TRI sites indicate where such activity is occurring. Augusta-Richmond County has 29 TRI sites. These fixed sites are summarized in Table 5.38 and shown in Figure 5.27. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:86 TABLE 5.38: SUMMARY OF TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY SITES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location TRI Facilities Augusta-Richmond County 28 Blythe 0 Fort Gordon 0 Hephzibah 1 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 29 FIGURE 5.27: TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY SITES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Environmental Protection Agency In addition to “fixed” hazardous materials locations, hazardous materials may also impact the county via roadways and rail. Many roads and rails in the county are subject to hazardous materials transport and all roads and rails that permit hazardous material transport are considered potentially at risk to an incident. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:87 5.17.3 Historical Occurrences The U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) lists historical occurrences throughout the nation. A “serious incident” is a hazardous materials incident that involves: a fatality or major injury caused by the release of a hazardous material, the evacuation of 25 or more persons as a result of release of a hazardous material or exposure to fire, a release or exposure to fire which results in the closure of a major transportation artery, the alteration of an aircraft flight plan or operation, the release of radioactive materials from Type B packaging, the release of over 11.9 gallons or 88.2 pounds of a severe marine pollutant, or the release of a bulk quantity (over 199 gallons or 882 pounds) of a hazardous material. However, prior to 2002, a hazardous materials “serious incident” was defined as follows: a fatality or major injury due to a hazardous material, closure of a major transportation artery or facility or evacuation of six or more person due to the presence of hazardous material, or a vehicle accident or derailment resulting in the release of a hazardous material. There have been a total of 339 recorded HAZMAT incidents in Augusta-Richmond County since 1971 (Table 5.39). These events resulted in nearly $800,000 (2016 dollars) of property damage as well as 27 injuries.29 Table 5.40 presents detailed information on historical HAZMAT incidents in Augusta- Richmond County as reported by the U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). However, due to the high number of reported incidents, detailed information is only provided for those incidents that are classified as serious incidents. TABLE 5.39: SUMMARY OF HAZMAT INCIDENTS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Occurrences Deaths / Injuries Property Damage (2016) Augusta-Richmond County 339 0/27 $771,913 Blythe 0 0/0 $0 Fort Gordon 0 0/0 $0 Hephzibah 0 0/0 $0 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 339 0/27 $771,913 Source: United States Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 29 Adjusted dollar values were calculated based on the average Consumer Price Index for a given calendar year. This index value has been calculated every year since 1913. For 2016, the October 2016 monthly index was used. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:88 TABLE 5.40: HAZMAT INCIDENTS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Report Number Date City Mode Serious Incident? Fatalities / Injuries Damages ($)* Quantity Released Augusta-Richmond County I-1971050086 4/13/1971 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/1 $0 0 I-1971120114 11/1/1971 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1971110181 11/16/1971 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0 I-1971120151 12/9/1971 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1972030123 3/9/1972 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1972060154 5/19/1972 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1972070315 5/30/1972 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1972100050 7/10/1972 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1972110005 7/25/1972 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1972100320 9/11/1972 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973020318 2/5/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973050019 4/3/1973 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/1 $0 0 I-1973050264 4/12/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973060085 5/19/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973070083 5/21/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973070479 7/3/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973080348 7/26/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973120078 10/19/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973120027 11/26/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973120183 11/30/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973120241 12/4/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1973120343 12/27/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974010198 12/28/1973 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974010328 1/17/1974 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974020238 1/28/1974 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974060643 6/9/1974 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974080280 6/13/1974 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974080740 7/26/1974 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974090703 8/13/1974 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974100530 10/8/1974 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1974120108 11/11/1974 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1975040071 3/18/1975 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1975040732 4/17/1975 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1975060952 6/17/1975 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1975100981 10/17/1975 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1975120079 10/21/1975 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/1 $0 0 I-1975110751 11/12/1975 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1976010760 1/12/1976 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $0 150 LGA I-1976010604 1/16/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 40 LGA I-1976020291 1/26/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1976040805 3/30/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 10 LGA I-1976040612 4/1/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1976080401 7/9/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1976090786 9/14/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:89 Report Number Date City Mode Serious Incident? Fatalities / Injuries Damages ($)* Quantity Released I-1976100493 9/29/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 3 LGA I-1976120180 11/2/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1977010239 12/21/1976 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 2 LGA I-1977020194 1/26/1977 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $0 2500 LGA I-1977060355 5/17/1977 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 2 LGA I-1977061223 6/8/1977 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1977061226 6/21/1977 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1977100041 7/2/1977 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 55 LGA I-1977080468 7/25/1977 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 550 SLB I-1977090932 8/30/1977 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1977110852 11/3/1977 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1978010308 12/30/1977 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1978020105 1/8/1978 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1978020526 2/3/1978 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $0 286 LGA I-1978041269 4/14/1978 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1978051189 4/16/1978 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0 I-1978051538 5/17/1978 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 125 SLB I-1978080459 7/18/1978 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1978100062 9/19/1978 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1978110965 11/7/1978 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1978120608 11/16/1978 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $0 147 LGA I-1978120065 11/17/1978 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 40 SLB I-1979040921 3/13/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1979050306 4/23/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1979050816 4/30/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1979120230 4/30/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 530 SLB I-1979051361 5/17/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1979090663 8/14/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1979090574 8/20/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1979092002 9/7/1979 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1979101071 10/2/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1979111102 10/23/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1979111019 10/23/1979 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 2 LGA I-1979120938 11/10/1979 AUGUSTA Rail Yes 0/12 $0 10216 LGA I-1980010733 12/18/1979 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $0 4500 LGA I-1980020147 1/22/1980 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/1 $0 0 I-1980041559 3/31/1980 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1980050839 4/30/1980 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $0 1660 LGA I-1980090152 5/5/1980 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1980061192 5/15/1980 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 50 SLB I-1980081138 7/25/1980 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $0 2600 LGA I-1980100882 9/5/1980 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 10 LGA I-1981020093 1/15/1981 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1981070123 6/16/1981 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1981100286 9/30/1981 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1981110260 10/29/1981 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 2 LGA SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:90 Report Number Date City Mode Serious Incident? Fatalities / Injuries Damages ($)* Quantity Released I-1981120176 11/18/1981 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 3 SLB I-1982030376 2/24/1982 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 460 SLB I-1982040634 4/16/1982 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1982080049 7/16/1982 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 I-1983010130 12/28/1982 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 SLB I-1983090329 9/1/1983 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $0 329 LGA I-1983090642 9/13/1983 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1984070089 6/11/1984 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.12 LGA I-1985030274 2/19/1985 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA I-1985060295 6/11/1985 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1985120234 11/16/1985 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.12 LGA I-1985110321 11/21/1985 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1986010113 11/26/1985 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 SLB I-1986010292 1/9/1986 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.5 LGA I-1986040463 3/18/1986 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 10 LGA I-1986090595 9/9/1986 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1.5 LGA I-1988050056 3/15/1988 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1988060186 5/9/1988 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0 I-1988060174 5/9/1988 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1988060175 5/10/1988 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.12 LGA I-1988070588 5/10/1988 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0 I-1988060175 5/10/1988 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA I-1988090451 9/2/1988 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA I-1989010387 12/24/1988 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 20 LGA I-1989040536 4/15/1989 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 2 LGA I-1989050242 4/18/1989 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0 I-1989050355 4/27/1989 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1989110463 10/16/1989 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $136,352 0 I-1989110057 10/17/1989 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1989110127 11/3/1989 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0 I-1990060775 11/3/1989 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $6,870 40 LGA I-1989120012 11/9/1989 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1990020218 1/31/1990 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1990050075 4/4/1990 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 30 LGA I-1990060181 5/25/1990 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1990100590 9/12/1990 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $110 55 LGA I-1990090627 9/13/1990 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1991040562 4/14/1991 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $27 10 LGA I-1991060673 5/30/1991 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 15 LGA I-1991070747 7/19/1991 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $2 0.125 LGA I-1991070746 7/19/1991 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.125 LGA I-1992020211 2/10/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $943 100 LGA I-1992040558 3/16/1992 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.0625 LGA I-1992060113 5/25/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.375 LGA I-1992060406 5/26/1992 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 50 LGA I-1992070583 7/16/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $9 1 LGA SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:91 Report Number Date City Mode Serious Incident? Fatalities / Injuries Damages ($)* Quantity Released I-1992080147 7/20/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1992080148 7/20/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1992080672 7/28/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $34 0.125 LGA I-1992100705 9/22/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA I-1992100608 9/29/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $3 1 LGA I-1992110520 10/25/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $86 0.125 LGA I-1992110519 10/25/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $86 0.125 LGA I-1992110518 10/25/1992 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $86 0.125 LGA I-1993060977 5/14/1993 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1993060923 5/27/1993 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $250 0.5 LGA I-1993100138 9/7/1993 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $2,270 55 LGA I-1993100130 9/16/1993 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $50 40 LGA I-1993110942 10/6/1993 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $804 1.056688 LGA I-1993110325 10/23/1993 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1994050375 4/1/1994 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 20 LGA I-1994051341 4/11/1994 AUGUSTA Rail Yes 0/0 $17,212 500 LGA I-1994051470 4/28/1994 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $203 4 LGA I-1994051216 5/8/1994 AUGUSTA Rail Yes 0/2 $0 1 LGA I-1994051216 5/8/1994 AUGUSTA Rail Yes 0/2 $0 1 LGA I-1994060684 5/9/1994 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1994060996 5/31/1994 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $4,888 10 LGA I-1994091182 8/16/1994 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $63 0.25 LGA I-1995010637 11/28/1994 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.264172 LGA I-1995010636 12/5/1994 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 4 LGA I-1995010232 12/20/1994 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $487 31 LGA I-1995020729 1/10/1995 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 2 LGA I-1995020726 1/24/1995 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 3 LGA I-1995040434 3/29/1995 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1995050161 4/7/1995 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-1995060242 5/9/1995 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.125 LGA I-1995080029 7/13/1995 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $790 2 LGA I-1995080029 7/13/1995 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $790 2 LGA I-1995111072 11/8/1995 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $5,527 1965 LGA I-1995121060 11/20/1995 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1996020123 1/4/1996 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $230,064 5355 LGA I-1996030549 2/20/1996 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $4,578 0.195313 LGA I-1996050229 4/5/1996 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0 I-1996050936 4/19/1996 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $460 10 LGA I-1996050700 4/26/1996 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1996060338 5/8/1996 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.5 LGA I-1996080336 7/18/1996 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1996080336 7/18/1996 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1996090839 9/6/1996 AUGUSTA Rail Yes 0/0 $38,344 100000 SLB I-1996091322 9/12/1996 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:92 Report Number Date City Mode Serious Incident? Fatalities / Injuries Damages ($)* Quantity Released I-1996090670 9/17/1996 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $902 330 LGA I-1997110332 1/3/1997 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $75 0.007813 LGA I-1997020138 1/24/1997 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 8 SLB I-1997020139 1/29/1997 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1997110333 2/14/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $75 0.09375 LGA I-1997110334 4/18/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.015625 LGA I-1997060720 5/14/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $3,576 40 LGA I-1997060332 5/17/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $225 10 LGA I-1997070020 5/23/1997 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $225 4000 LGA I-1997080708 6/4/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $300 5 LGA I-1997070220 6/6/1997 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 3 LGA I-1997101161 9/11/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1997091435 9/13/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/1 $0 5 LGA I-1997101147 9/21/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.023438 LGA I-1997101140 9/28/1997 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.007809 LGA I-1998040756 3/23/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $576 10 LGA I-1998050006 4/8/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $4,872 5 LGA I-1998050003 4/20/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $443 8 LGA I-1998051393 5/11/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1998061071 6/9/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 10 LGA I-1998080048 7/10/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $295 0.5 LGA I-1998091500 9/11/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $4,577 30 LGA I-1998091535 9/15/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $258 0.0625 LGA I-1998111179 10/5/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $1,462 3 LGA I-1998110702 11/13/1998 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.5 LGA I-1999030868 2/22/1999 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 40 SLB I-1999050623 4/14/1999 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1999060018 5/22/1999 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $744 2 LGA I-1999110106 9/21/1999 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-1999110805 10/29/1999 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $1,238 40 LGA I-1999121244 12/5/1999 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-2001051487 12/10/1999 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $16,178 250 LGA I-1999121425 12/17/1999 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 10 LGA I-2000010656 1/11/2000 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2000020604 2/2/2000 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 50 LGA I-2000041053 4/14/2000 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $3,756 75 LGA I-2000051648 5/11/2000 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $419 5 SLB I-2000080506 7/18/2000 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-2000081322 7/22/2000 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.8375 LGA I-2000090275 7/28/2000 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $252 1.5 LGA I-2000080495 7/30/2000 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $28 20 LGA I-2000090923 8/16/2000 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA I-2000120384 8/30/2000 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $2,795 50 LGA SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:93 Report Number Date City Mode Serious Incident? Fatalities / Injuries Damages ($)* Quantity Released I-2000100184 9/10/2000 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 40 LGA I-2000120101 10/23/2000 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $1,048 5 SLB I-2001030287 1/18/2001 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $340 0.000065 SLB I-2001070596 6/20/2001 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 15 LGA I-2001070599 6/25/2001 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 15 LGA I-2001071521 6/27/2001 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-2001070509 7/5/2001 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $272 0.125 LGA I-2001080495 7/21/2001 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.125 LGA I-2001110044 10/26/2001 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $272 2 SLB I-2002010100 10/30/2001 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA I-2002060257 5/8/2002 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.125 LGA I-2002071160 7/10/2002 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2002090356 7/23/2002 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $268 0 I-2002100745 8/27/2002 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2002090696 8/29/2002 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $20 15 LGA I-2002100283 9/4/2002 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $1,471 16 LGA I-2002101094 10/14/2002 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $13 5 LGA I-2002120628 12/5/2002 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/0 $201 150 LGA I-2003030330 2/14/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 3 LGA I-2003040247 3/13/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.001057 LGA I-2003050062 4/11/2003 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $13 1 LGA I-2003051205 4/25/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/3 $392 20 LGA I-2003060385 5/8/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $5,395 40 LGA I-2003070400 5/28/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.264172 LGA I-2003060888 6/4/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $177 0.5 LGA I-2003060884 6/5/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $1,112 0.023438 LGA I-2003080102 6/24/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $327 15 LGA I-2003080457 6/26/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $39 0.125 LGA I-2003080322 7/14/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-2003101106 9/24/2003 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2003101416 10/2/2003 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2003120701 11/17/2003 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2004030306 2/27/2004 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $255 3 LGA I-2004040357 4/1/2004 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $185 2 LGA I-2004071171 7/8/2004 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $13 10 LGA I-2004080379 7/22/2004 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-2004080097 7/29/2004 AUGUSTA Air No 0/0 $0 0.000066 SLB I-2004090424 8/14/2004 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $127 2 LGA I-2004110038 10/25/2004 AUGUSTA Highway Yes 0/1 $0 33085 LGA I-2004110296 10/26/2004 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.015625 LGA I-2005010065 12/21/2004 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 5 LGA I-2005020956 2/1/2005 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0 E-2005040157 3/15/2005 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $55,504 900 GCF SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:94 Report Number Date City Mode Serious Incident? Fatalities / Injuries Damages ($)* Quantity Released E-2005040157 3/15/2005 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $55,504 900 GCF E-2005040157 3/15/2005 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $55,504 900 GCF I-2005050010 3/19/2005 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $801 75 LGA I-2005050305 4/2/2005 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $10,782 5 LGA I-2005050744 4/22/2005 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $4,350 3 LGA E-2005080090 7/21/2005 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $4,621 50 LGA I-2005081778 7/25/2005 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.5 LGA I-2005090002 8/4/2005 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2005091140 9/12/2005 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2006020313 1/20/2006 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2006020420 1/27/2006 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $3,024 12.6125 LGA I-2006030266 2/15/2006 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $1,802 1 LGA I-2006060155 5/23/2006 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 2 LGA I-2006070723 6/26/2006 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA E-2006100093 8/25/2006 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 3 LGA E-2006110138 8/29/2006 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 20 LGA X-2006120114 11/9/2006 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA I-2006120394 11/22/2006 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA X-2007010028 12/8/2006 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 32 SLB I-2007020606 2/7/2007 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.0625 LGA X-2007030081 2/9/2007 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.52836 LGA I-2007040129 3/24/2007 AUGUSTA Rail Yes 0/0 $41,202 4000 SLB X-2007040079 3/27/2007 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2007050336 5/5/2007 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $1,741 1 LGA X-2007070073 6/27/2007 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA E-2007070412 7/19/2007 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.007812 LGA X-2007100336 10/5/2007 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.79254 LGA X-2007100400 10/11/2007 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2008020089 2/4/2008 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $3,353 0.01671 GCF E-2008030214 2/21/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.0625 LGA X-2008050015 4/11/2008 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.1 LGA X-2008060142 5/22/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2008060122 5/27/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2008070279 7/3/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2008080252 8/12/2008 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $5,589 5 LGA X-2008090120 8/28/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 2.204623 SLB E-2008100074 9/5/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.039062 LGA X-2008090286 9/10/2008 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $1,688 1 LGA E-2008090278 9/15/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.09375 LGA E-2008100346 10/3/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $5,589 40 LGA X-2008120005 11/15/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2008120205 12/5/2008 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2009050154 4/18/2009 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 1 LGA E-2009050247 4/20/2009 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.046875 LGA SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:95 Report Number Date City Mode Serious Incident? Fatalities / Injuries Damages ($)* Quantity Released X-2009060333 6/10/2009 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0 E-2009070201 6/15/2009 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.1875 LGA X-2009070007 6/23/2009 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 0.125 LGA X-2009070008 6/27/2009 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $1,688 0.25 LGA X-2009100167 9/18/2009 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA X-2009110173 10/27/2009 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.0625 LGA X-2010070262 7/6/2010 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2011050487 5/11/2011 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA X-2011070461 7/8/2011 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA E-2011090438 8/30/2011 AUGUSTA Rail No 0/0 $0 12 LGA X-2012080475 7/25/2012 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.26418 LGA E-2012100311 10/1/2012 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 20 LGA I-2013010443 11/28/2012 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.125 LGA E-2012120319 12/3/2012 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.03125 SLB E-2013040069 3/19/2013 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA E-2013040071 3/19/2013 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 LGA E-2014090674 6/3/2014 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.2 LGA E-2014060223 6/9/2014 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.000011 SLB E-2014080273 8/15/2014 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 2 SLB I-2014100047 9/9/2014 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 2 LGA E-2014120328 12/16/2014 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.0625 LGA E-2015020506 1/30/2015 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.5 LGA E-2015071286 7/28/2015 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 1 SLB E-2015120470 11/30/2015 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA X-2016010159 12/14/2015 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.007812 LGA E-2016010325 12/26/2015 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/1 $5,077 1 LGA I-2016030041 2/23/2016 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.015625 LGA I-2016030250 3/18/2016 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $0 0.25 LGA E-2016070779 7/27/2016 AUGUSTA Highway No 0/0 $7,500 15 LGA Blythe None Reported -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Fort Gordon None Reported -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah None Reported -- -- -- -- -- -- -- *Property damage is reported in 2016 dollars. Source: United States Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration In addition, the county recently experienced a hazardous materials incident on February 5, 2017 at a fixed site where there was a release of liquid nitrogen on site that caused one death and 4 hospitalizations. This incident is currently being investigated, as of mid-February 2017. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:96 5.17.4 Probability of Future Occurrence Given the location of numerous TRI facilities in Augusta-Richmond County as well as prior roadway, railway, air, and other incidents it is highly likely (100 percent annual probability) that a hazardous material incident may occur in the county. County and municipal officials are mindful of this possibility and take precautions to prevent such an event from occurring. Additionally, there are detailed plans in place to respond to an occurrence. 5.17.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) The accidental or intentional release of a hazardous material could have both immediate and long lasting effects on the health of the public. Any release needs to be quickly identified and the proper response guidelines followed to reduce the possible impact on the public. Evacuation is always a consideration when dealing with harmful substances. The public should be aware that hazards exist from the presence of hazardous materials, and should take preparedness actions at home and in the workplace to act should a release of materials occur. Chemical hazards can have a significant effect on public confidence in government as incidents often cause serious harm to people via long-term health impacts, contamination of soil or drinking water, and even death. Because of the dangers associated with many chemicals and the level of control that humans have over chemical incidents compared to natural hazards, public confidence could be damaged severely in the event of an incident. Responders First responders must be vigilant when chemical/hazardous materials are suspected to be involved. The proper protective apparel must be worn and protocols must be followed to ensure that contaminated individuals and objects go through appropriate decontamination procedures prior to being moved away from the incident, regardless of the situation. Contamination of other responders or citizens must be avoided. The appropriate personnel, such as Hazardous Materials teams, must be notified to ensure that the proper measures are taken to prevent further harm and other related impacts. Continuity of Operations During a hazardous materials incident, normal operations are likely be maintained with only moderate stress on daily operations. In the event of a larger scale hazardous materials spill, there could be some loss of continuity of operations as a result of strain on personnel and equipment, but typically this will not be the case. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Building Stock Residential – Residential structures have numerous hazardous materials sitting around that are generally contained, but can become hazards when spilled, used incorrectly, mixed with other chemicals, or come in contact with fire. Cleaning products, fertilizers, and pesticides are common examples of household supplies that are considered hazardous materials. Fires, explosions, leaks, or releases into the air or water supply are the incidents most likely to occur from residential buildings. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:97 Commercial – Commercial buildings may have hazardous materials contained within them that could present a hazard. These materials are regulated and reported to appropriate entities. Proper containers and labeling can prevent inappropriate use, but accidents can still cause workers to be exposed. Industrial – Many industrial facilities have some types of hazardous materials onsite that could, if handled improperly, become a health and/or environmental risk. Hazardous Materials Facilities – A hazardous materials event is most likely to take place where the material is created or stored. Hazardous materials facilities have their own highly-trained personnel for handling and cleaning up the particular substances stored onsite. The facility’s plans are highly specific to the materials stored there, thus providing for effective responses to incidents that involve these materials. Some facilities contain hazardous materials that can spread or leak quickly, or are held in extremely dangerous concentrations. There can still be significant effects on workers and others in close proximity despite having good planning in place. Critical Facilities and Personnel Hospitals – Hospitals utilize and store some hazardous materials on site. Biological materials and radioactive wastes are the primary concerns in a hospital setting. Plans are in place to manage these concerns in both routine and emergency situations. An external hazardous materials event that occurs near the hospital or directly impacts a hospital could create service disruptions such as patient care. Decisions about sheltering-in-place or evacuation could be complex, and may require outside resources if evacuations are deemed necessary in a situation. Emergency Services – Some emergency services facilities store hazardous materials onsite, including cleaning agents and fuel. These must be appropriately contained and labeled. Emergency Shelters – Emergency shelters may be opened if homes have been exposed to hazardous materials and evacuations occur. Hazardous materials could also impact emergency shelters themselves. If this occurs, inhabitants would be moved to alternative facilities. Transportation Systems Interstates – Hazardous materials can have an impact on interstate transportation if a release occurs on or in the vicinity of the roadway. Significant traffic disruptions may occur, slowing commerce or forcing alternative routing and further congestion of other areas. Airports – Airports facilities may have to cease operations if hazardous materials are released nearby or discovered onsite. Rail Lines – Rail lines are one of the more prominent places that hazardous materials are transported. A hazardous materials event on the rail system can impact rail traffic and the overall system. Cleanup efforts wherever the event occurred could be costly and go on for extended periods, shutting down that part of the rail system for that time. Critical Utilities Power Lines – It is possible for power lines to be impacted by hazardous materials if fire or other physical hazards to the network are involved. Long-term outages may occur if there are many downed or corrupted lines or technicians are unable to repair issues due to the presence of hazardous materials. Natural Gas – Natural gas distribution lines can be problematic with some hazardous materials if contact is made with the natural gas supply. Most of the natural gas infrastructure is located underground, making exposure highly unlikely. However, natural gas itself can be the hazardous material involved in the incident. A utility or other work crew member may strike a line and cause a leak. Also, degradation of the line can cause a release. Explosions and fires would be significant concerns for the immediate vicinity. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:98 Communication Systems and Networks Telephone Systems/Cell Phone Towers – It is possible for telephone lines or cell phone towers to be impacted by hazardous materials if fire or other physical hazards to these networks are involved. Long- term outages may occur if there are many downed or corrupted lines/towers or technicians are unable to repair issues due to the presence of hazardous materials. Internet Capabilities – Internet connections are not likely to be impacted by hazardous materials unless cable-based connections are impacted. Wireless sites that are hit directly may cause local or regional connectivity problems. Economy Small/Local Employers – The economic impact of a hazardous materials-related incident can be significant locally. Directly affected commerce is the greatest concern, as spills and releases can force businesses such as shopping centers, markets, and financial centers to be shut down for indeterminate periods of time. Contaminated water can be especially problematic as it can cause extensive shutdowns and put many people in danger. The overall costs depend on the chemical(s) involved, how much is released, the processes and time used to manage the spill or release, who or what is contaminated, whether a fire takes place, etc. Cleanup is a less significant cost and is typically handled by the party responsible for the spill or release. Large Employers – Large employers can be significantly impacted by hazardous materials, especially if the hazardous material is located on-site of the business. Cleanup processes may be costly after the incident depending on the product involved and the severity of the exposure, spill, or release. Financial Centers – Hazardous materials incidents could have a significant impact on financial centers, especially during business hours. Cleanup processes may be costly after the incident depending on the product involved and the severity of the exposure, spill, or release. Special Consideration Areas City Centers – Hazardous materials incidents would likely have a significant impact on city centers, especially during hours when there are many people present. Cleanup processes could be very costly after the incident depending on the product involved and the severity of the exposure, spill, or release. Large Event Arenas – A hazardous materials incident could occur at any large gathering if it was the target of a terrorism event. Also, a large event arena could be forced to deal with a hazardous materials incident if it is located in close proximity to them. Arenas and other major event venues may also be situated along transportation routes where vehicles transporting such materials could become involved in an accident. Historical and Cultural Landmarks – Hazardous materials are unlikely to impact parks or its visitors unless it was specifically targeted or affected by a person, vehicle, or other carrier, or if the substance’s leak or release were to spread from an incident into the park(s). Environment The environmental impact is highly dependent on the location and the severity of the event. Some of the materials involved in these incidents can be cleaned up or do not have lasting impacts on the areas affected. Others may cause crops and other vegetation to be destroyed, sometimes beyond the ability to grow back and animal populations may become displaced. Some areas may be deemed uninhabitable or not fit for development. Water sources may also be impacted by hazardous materials releases or spills, which can affect fish, animal, and plant populations as well as humans that come in contact with contaminated water. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:99 5.18 CYBERTERRORISM 5.18.1 Background Cyber attacks represent a broad category of incidents that relate to deliberate attacks on information technology systems that the world has come to rely on more and more in recent years. Unlike traditional forms of physical attack, cyber attacks are often difficult to identify and recognize. Among the potential threats encompassed under the categorization of a cyber threat are viruses erasing systems, intruders breaking into systems and altering files or using a device to attack others, and stealing confidential information.30 Cyberterrorism is a deliberate attack on an individual or group using the internet. In the past few decades, society has become dependent on computers and internet connections for much of daily life. This dependence has opened up the avenue for crime to be committed from afar, often from a different country. Some common examples of cyberterrorism include a hacker accessing bank accounts by hacking into a bank’s website, infecting a computer system with a virus, Trojan horse, or worm to inflict damage to the information in the system, or disseminating incorrect or otherwise flawed information, also called “misinformation.” Also, denial-of-service attacks could occur against prominent websites, which prevent legitimate users from accessing information or services. One of the most challenging aspects of mitigating and preparing for cyber attacks is that they can be carried out by many disparate sources to achieve different ends. Some attacks are carried out by individuals, while others are orchestrated as part of state-sponsored activities. Moreover, some attacks are intended to steal information or money, while others are intended to purposefully disrupt daily operations. 5.18.2 Location and Spatial Extent Cyber attacks could occur anywhere within the county and because of the pervasiveness of information technology systems, the impacts could be widespread throughout the community and difficult to predict. 5.18.3 Historical Occurrences In Augusta-Richmond County, large-scale cyberterrorism attempts or attacks have not been reported, though there was a breach of the Division of Aging Services at the state level that affected some citizens of Augusta. Additionally, the State of Georgia was the victim of a breach in 2015 that compromised roughly 6 million social security numbers. In addition, in the recently published 2016 Data Breach Investigation Report31 shows that most the major breaches that take place across the country are in the Finance sector and the Accommodation sector. A full breakdown of the number of breach incidents by industry sector can be found in Figure 5.28. 30 https://www.ready.gov/cyber-attack 31 Data Breach Investigations Report. Verizon. 2016. Retrieved on January 3, 2017 from http://www.verizonenterprise.com/verizon-insights-lab/dbir/2016/ SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:100 FIGURE 5.28: NATIONWIDE CYBER-BREACHES BY INDUSTRY SECTOR Source: Data Breach Investigations Report, 2016 As can be seen in Figure 5.29, Crimeware and Miscellaneous Errors together account for more than 50 percent of the data breaches. According to the Verizon report, crimeware represents malware infections that defy exact classification and are less likely to receive an intense investigation or involve law enforcement. These attacks tend to be motivated by financial gain and are opportunistic in nature. Miscellaneous Errors are basically an error on the part of a user that results in a breach of data. Examples of this include sensitive information reaching the wrong recipient, publishing nonpublic data to public servers, and insecure disposal of personal data (such as medical records). SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:101 FIGURE 5.29: BREAKDOWN OF BREACHES BY TYPE Source: Data Breach Investigations Report, 2016 5.18.4 Probability of Future Occurrence Although there have been no previous cyber threats in the county of significant impact, it is possible (between 1 and 10 percent annual probability) that the county could be impacted in the future. 5.18.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) The aim of a cyberterrorist is typically to corrupt or exploit protected information. Depending on the target of the ploy, a significant number of people can be victims of identity theft, fraud, or other forms of technology-based crime. Anyone with an account, membership, or other relationship with an entity that requires the storage of information is vulnerable. An individual/user must rely on the entity of affiliation to create and maintain safeguards against the intrusion of computerized systems. However, even the strongest of safeguards can be corrupted or evaded. Continual monitoring of attempted or successful attempts at cyberterrorism is warranted to lessen the potential impacts. The public confidence in government and nongovernmental organizations response may be impacted by a disaster based upon societal expectations and media influence with respect to cyberterrorism. Public confidence can be gained when the public’s expectations of response and recovery services are met or exceeded. Public confidence may be impacted by media interpretation and reporting of the event, whether positively or negatively. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:102 Responders Cyberterrorists may try to intrude into electronic safety equipment or systems. This may increase call volume, block systems, or otherwise hinder emergency operations. Continuity of Operations In the event of a cyber-attack, continuity of operations could be impacted if many of the services (such as internet or other IT programs) that are required to maintain daily operations are shut down by the attack. This could cause considerable detriment to normal operations in the county. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Building Stock Residential – There are no expected impacts other than individual users at a localized level that would not pertain to this plan. Commercial – Some commercial technologies may be targeted and exploited by cyberterrorists. Industrial – Some industrial technologies may be targeted and exploited by cyberterrorists. Hazardous Materials Facilities – Cyberterrorists may target and exploit or manipulate processes which in turn cause the release of hazardous materials. Critical Facilities and Personnel Hospitals – Cyberterrorists may target life sustaining equipment or systems, or cause other technological disruptions. Emergency Services – Cyberterrorists may target and sabotage information networks and communications equipment that could disrupt services. Emergency Shelters – Emergency shelters are unlikely to be targets of cyberterrrorism. Transportation Systems Interstates – There are no expected impacts. Airports – Numerous systems utilized by airports can be compromised by cyberterrorists. Rail Lines – Numerous systems utilized by rail lines can be compromised by cyberterrorists. Critical Utilities High Voltage Distribution Lines – Cyberterrorists could target and sabotage power distribution systems. Power Lines – Cyberterrorists could target and sabotage power distribution systems. Natural Gas – Natural gas distribution technologies could be targeted by cyberterrorism. Communications Systems and Networks Telephone Systems – The telephone system could be compromised by cyberterrorists, either by disrupting the ability to use it or exploiting the information that can be obtained from those using it. Cell Phone Towers – Operations could be disrupted by cyberterrorists exploiting systems and equipment. Internet Capabilities – Cyberterrorists can compromise the systems that provide internet accessibility. Economy Small/Local Employers – Freezing, redirecting, or stealing financial assets can have drastic impacts on a small business. Banking and credit institutions are commonly affected or targeted by fraudulent SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:103 activities and often store a great deal of information on small businesses, so large-scale intrusions can have significant impacts on the local economy. Large Employers – Large employers are more likely to be targeted by cyberterrorists than individuals or small businesses. Larger businesses generally have greater assets to exploit and store more personal information on private individuals or employees. Financial Centers – As stated previously, banking and credit institutions are commonly affected or targeted by fraudulent activities. Large-scale intrusions can have significant economic impact. Special Consideration Areas City Centers – There are no expected impacts. Large Event Arenas – Electronically ticketed events may require purchasers to provide personal information that could be compromised. Historical and Cultural Landmarks – There are no expected impacts. Environment There are no expected impacts. 5.19 DAM/LEVEE FAILURE 5.19.1 Background Worldwide interest in dam and levee safety has risen significantly in recent years. Aging infrastructure, new hydrologic information, and population growth in floodplain areas downstream from dams and near levees have resulted in an increased emphasis on safety, operation, and maintenance. There are approximately 80,000 dams in the United States today, the majority of which are privately owned. Other owners include state and local authorities, public utilities, and federal agencies. The benefits of dams are numerous: they provide water for drinking, navigation, and agricultural irrigation. Dams also provide hydroelectric power, create lakes for fishing and recreation, and save lives by preventing or reducing floods. Though dams have many benefits, they also can pose a risk to communities if not designed, operated, and maintained properly. In the event of a dam failure, the energy of the water stored behind even a small dam is capable of causing loss of life and great property damage if development exists downstream. If a levee breaks, scores of properties may become submerged in floodwaters and residents may become trapped by rapidly rising water. The failure of dams and levees has the potential to place large numbers of people and great amounts of property in harm’s way. 5.19.2 Location and Spatial Extent Dam extent can be determined using the Georgia Safe Dams Program dam classification system which uses a high (category I), significant (category II), exempt, and breached classifications. The hazard classification system is based on the consequences of failure, not the condition of the dam. According to the “Georgia Safe Dams Act of 1978”: Category I dams are those for which improper operation or dam failure would result in probable loss of human life. Situations constituting 'probable loss of life' are those situations involving SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:104 frequently occupied structures or facilities, including but not limited to, residences, commercial and manufacturing facilities, schools, and churches. Category II dams are those for which improper operation or dam failure would not be expected to result in probable loss of human life. As of 2016, there were 27 identified dams in the county and 6 were classified as Category II hazard dams. These dams are listed in the Table 5.41 below and Figure 5.30 shows the location of inventoried dams in the County. TABLE 5.41: SUMMARY OF DAM LOCATIONS AND BREACHES Location Number of Dams Number of High Hazard Dams Number of Breaches Augusta-Richmond County 27 6 0 Blythe 0 0 0 Fort Gordon 0 0 0 Hephzibah 0 0 0 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 27 6 0 Source: Georgia Safe Dams Program SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:105 FIGURE 5.30: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY DAM LOCATION AND HAZARD RANKING Source: Georgia Safe Dams Program, 2016 It should be noted that dam regulations for classifying dams was recently changed. As a result, generally more dams are classified as high hazard. 5.19.3 Historical Occurrences There have been no dam breaches reported in Augusta-Richmond County according to the Georgia Safe Dams Program. 5.19.4 Probability of Future Occurrence Given the current dam inventory and historic data, a dam breach is unlikely (less than 1 percent annual probability) in the future. However, as has been demonstrated in the past, regular monitoring is necessary to prevent these events. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:106 5.19.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Many of the impacts associated with a dam/levee failure are the same as those that would be associated with a flood event. However, the primary difference for members of the public in the case of a dam/levee failure is that often citizens who might be impacted by a dam/levee failure may believe themselves to be protected from flood events as a result of the dam/levee and therefore, may not be anticipating the event. This may have a severe impact on public confidence in the long run as citizens may view this as a failure of government institutions to properly regulate and control the dam/levee. That is to say, they may ultimately view the incident as preventable, unlike a flood that occurs purely from natural causes. Responders Similar to the issues associated with the flood hazard, responders would be impacted by a dam/levee failure as they may be forced to attempt to assist citizens who have become trapped in their homes or in flood waters. Responders may have difficulty accessing homes or other structures where they need to provide support. Continuity of Operations A dam/levee failure would be unlikely to impact continuity of operations as the event would likely be confined to a specific area of the county and most operations facilities in the county are not at risk of being impacted by a dam/levee failure. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Building Stock Residential – Any residential properties located downstream of a dam/levee and located in the inundation zone may be impacted. Commercial – Commercial properties may be impacted in a way that is similar to the impacts from a flood event. Industrial – Any industrial facilities that are located within a dam/levee failure inundation zone may be impacted by the event. Hazardous Materials – Similar to flood events, if a facility that houses hazardous materials is impacted by flooding from a dam/levee failure, there may be contamination of the stream/river and ultimately the water supply. Critical Facilities and Personnel Hospitals – Hospitals tend to not be located in dam/levee failure inundation zones, but could be impacted in terms of providing care if certain roads are flooded and patients cannot reach the hospital to receive care. Emergency Services – Like hospitals, most emergency services facilities are not located in high risk areas to a dam/levee failure, however they may be impacted in terms of accessibility. Emergency Shelters – Emergency shelters are typically selected in locations that are safe from dam/levee failure. However, if shelters were impacted, they would likely experience similar impacts as those from a flood event. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:107 Transportation Systems Interstates – Interstate highways are typically built in areas where they will not be flooded by a dam/levee failure, though other important roadways may become flooded causing accessibility and travel issues. Airports – Airport facilities are rarely located in dam/levee failure inundation areas, so airports would not likely be impacted. Rail Lines – Rail lines tend to be built well above flood levels, though it is possible that some lines may be impacted by flooding as a result of a dam/levee failure. This could cause disruptions in service and some economic loss. Critical Utilities Power Lines – Like a flood, a dam/levee failure may cause localized power outages as floodwaters inundate critical power infrastructure and down power lines. Natural Gas – Natural gas distribution networks may be damaged from flooding and create additional hazards from damaged pipes or other gas infrastructure. Communication Systems and Networks Telephone Systems– As with the flooding hazard, dam/levee failures may damage telephone systems and cause disruption of service, especially in areas impacted by the floodwaters. Cell Phone Towers – Cellular telephone towers are generally built high enough to not be impacted by a dam/levee failure. Internet Capabilities – Internet connections could be impacted on a local scale if infrastructure is damaged. Economy Small/Local Employers – Flooding from a dam/levee failure could cause damage to local businesses and have significant financial impacts depending on the location and type of business. Large Employers – Large employers may also be impacted by a dam/levee failure if they are located in a high risk area. Environment The impacts on the environment from a dam/levee failure might be that ecosystems and habitats that existed while a dam was in place on a stream/river could be destroyed as floodwaters destabilize areas by inundating areas that had not previously been under water or causing higher flow rates downstream. 5.20 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INCIDENT 5.20.1 Background A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency as “an event that has led to significant consequences to people, the environment or the facility. Often, this type of incident results from damage to the reactor core of a nuclear power plant which can release radioactivity into the environment. The degree of exposure from nuclear accidents has varied historically from serious to catastrophic. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:108 By some estimates, over 50 percent of nuclear accidents that have ever occurred were in the United States.32 However, it is also important to note that generally, nuclear accidents are a rare occurrence. Many incidents are extremely well known due to their large-scale impact and serious effects on people and the environment, but incidents are generally not common One of the most notorious accidents in the United States was the Three Mile Island accident which occurred in 1979 and released small amounts of radioactive gases and iodine into the environment. Although no deaths have been directly attributed to the accident, it invoked a strong public reaction and demonstrated the potential dangers associated with nuclear power generation. Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant, which is the plant located closest to Augusta-Richmond County, is a 3,626 megawatt power plant that began commercial operation in 1987. It has pressurized water reactors and operates with a very high level of security. 5.20.2 Location and Spatial Extent The southeastern portion of the county is at highest risk to a nuclear incident. Areas in this part of the county are susceptible due to their relative proximity to the Vogtle Power Plant. The International Atomic Energy Association has developed a scale called the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES) which provides a quantitative means of assessing the extent of a nuclear event. This scale, like the MMI used for earthquakes, is logarithmic which means that each increasing level on the scale represents an event 10 times more severe than the previous level (Figure 5.31). FIGURE 5.31: INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR EVENT SCALE Source: International Atomic Energy Agency 32 Benjamin K. Sovacool. A Critical Evaluation of Nuclear Power and Renewable Electricity in Asia Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 40, No. 3, August 2010, pp. 393–400. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:109 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear plants. Areas located within 10 miles of the station are considered to be within the zone of highest risk to a nuclear incident and this radius is the designated evacuation radius recommended by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Within the 10-mile zone, the primary concern is exposure to and inhalation of radioactive contamination. Only a very small area of the county is located within the 10-mile radius of the power plant. The most concerning effects in the secondary 50-mile zone are related to ingestion of food and liquids that may have been contaminated. The remainder of the county is located within this 50-mile radius which is still considered to be at risk from a nuclear incident (Figure 5.32). FIGURE 5.32: NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INCIDENT HAZARD ZONES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: International Atomic Energy Agency 5.20.3 Historical Occurrences Although there have been no major nuclear events at the Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant, there is some possibility that one could occur as there have been incidents in the past in the United States at other facilities and at facilities around the world. Additionally, a list of minor events/notifications was acquired from reports collected by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC classifies events using the SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:110 scale found in Table 5.42. A list of events at Vogtle Nuclear Plant can be found in Table 5.43. It is noteworthy that all of the events were minor in magnitude and many were insignificant enough that they did not register on the classification scale. TABLE 5.42: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SCALE FOR EVENTS OCCURRING AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Classification Description Notification of Unusual Event (NOUE) Events are in progress or have occurred which indicate a potential degradation of the level of safety of the plant or indicate a security threat to facility protection has been initiated. No releases of radioactive material requiring offsite response or monitoring are expected unless further degradation of safety systems occurs. [Note: This term is sometimes shortened to Unusual Event (UE). The terms Notification of Unusual Event, NOUE and Unusual Event are used interchangeably.] Alert Events are in progress or have occurred which involve an actual or potential substantial degradation of the level of safety of the plant or a security event that involves probable life threatening risk to site personnel or damage to site equipment because of HOSTILE ACTION. Any releases are expected to be limited to small fractions of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) protective action guides (PAGs) Site Area Emergency Site Area Emergency (SAE) – Events are in progress or have occurred which involve actual or likely major failures of plant functions needed for protection of the public or hostile action that results in intentional damage or malicious acts; 1) toward site personnel or equipment that could lead to the likely failure of or; 2) that prevent effective access to, equipment needed for the protection of the public. Any releases are not expected to result in exposure levels which exceed EPA PAG exposure levels beyond the site boundary. General Emergency Events are in progress or have occurred which involve actual or imminent substantial core degradation or melting with potential for loss of containment integrity or hostile action that results in an actual loss of physical control of the facility. Releases can be reasonably expected to exceed EPA PAG exposure levels offsite for more than the immediate site area. Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission TABLE 5.43: HISTORICAL OCCURRENCES OF NOTIFIABLE EVENTS AT VOGTLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Date Retrieved From* Classification Plant Description 1/19/1989 Licensee Event Report Notification of Unusual Event Vogtle Unit 1 REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE LEADS TO UNIT SHUTDOWN 3/9/1989 Licensee Event Report Notification of Unusual Event Vogtle Unit 2 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM LEAKEAGE DURING CHECK VALVE TESTING 3/20/1990 Licensee Event Report Site Area Emergency Vogtle Unit 1 LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER LEADS TO SITE AREA EMERGENCY 5/14/1992 Licensee Event Report Notification of Unusual Event Vogtle Unit 1 REACTOR SHUTDOWN DUE TO EXCESSIVE UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE 4/18/1993 Licensee Event Report Notification of Unusual Event Vogtle Unit 1 SAFETY INJECTION INITIATED DURING SLAVE RELAY TESTING SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:111 Date Retrieved From* Classification Plant Description 8/8/2003 Preliminary Notification Reports Not Applicable Vogtle Unit 2 Unit 2 Shutdown to Investigate and Repair Mechanical Seal Leak on Reactor Vessel Head: 5/24/2005 Preliminary Notification Reports Not Applicable Vogtle Unit 2 Unit 2 Shutdown to Repair Condenser Tube(s) Leak 12/12/2005 Preliminary Notification Reports Not Applicable Vogtle Unit 2 Unit 2 Shutdown to Repair RHR Pipe Leak 12/19/2005 Preliminary Notification Reports Not Applicable Vogtle Unit 2 Shutdown to Repair Residual Heat Removal Pipe Leak 3/9/2007 Preliminary Notification Reports Notification of Unusual Event Vogtle Unit 2 Reactor Coolant System Leakage in Excess of 10 Gallons Per Minute 4/25/2007 Preliminary Notification Reports Not Applicable Vogtle Unit 2 Automatic Reactor Trip/Plant Shutdown Greater than 72 Hours Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission *Preliminary Notification Reports (http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/event-status/prelim-notice/): These are brief descriptions, generated by NRC regions when needed, of matters that are of significant safety or safeguards concern or have high public interest. PNs are used to promptly inform the Commissioners and others in NRC and Agreement States with new and current information. Licensee Event Reports (https://lersearch.inl.gov/Entry.aspx): Commercial nuclear reactor licensees are required to report certain event information per 10 CFR 50.73. Search was for- "Notification of Unusual Event" "Alert" "Site Area Emergency" "General Emergency" In addition, county officials were recently made aware of an event that caused a shutdown of the Vogtle Plant’s Unit 1, as one of the components of the unit’s steam line contained a failed o-ring component.33 This incident occurred on February 3, 2017 and according to a company spokesman, the site technicians were able to keep the situation under control and prevent risk to the public. 5.20.4 Probability of Future Occurrence A nuclear event is a very rare occurrence in the United States due to the intense regulation of the industry. There have been incidents in the past, but it is considered unlikely (less than 1 percent annual probability). 5.20.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) The majority of the public in Augusta-Richmond County would be most impacted if they were to ingest impacted home grown crops, drink milk produced from livestock which have fed on contaminated grasses, or consume contaminated surface water. Ingestion of radiological materials may result in internal contamination if ionizing radiation is released in the body. This can cause serious health risks, especially if critical organs are affected. Some organs such as the thyroid take in certain isotopes and it is extremely difficult to purge the material from the body. The population of Augusta-Richmond located in the southeast corner of the county would potentially be impacted directly by radiation exposure which can cause both acute and chronic effects in the body. 33 Equipment Failure Shuts Down Vogtle Reactor. The Augusta Chronicle. February 6, 2017. Retrieved on February 14, 2017 from: http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/2017-02-06/equipment-failure-shuts-down-vogtle-reactor# SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:112 The public will be extremely concerned about their health and safety during and after a nuclear incident. Confidence will be dependent upon the availability of information and perceived quality of response by government and nongovernment service providers. Responders First responders are vulnerable to the same impacts as the general public but also may be at greater risk due to their need to function outdoors, operating in contaminated environments. These responders will likely need to operate in personal protective equipment and limit their outdoor exposure. Proper decontamination is likely to be necessary to reduce the spread of contamination. Continuity of Operations In the wake of a nuclear accident, continuity of operations in Augusta-Richmond County would likely be maintained relatively well since the county is only impacted in most areas by the 50 mile buffer area. Generally operations could proceed from their normal location, with personnel and equipment remaining more or less unharmed. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Building Stock Residential – In general, most residential buildings in the county would not be impacted by an incident. Though in a highly impactful event, it is possible that homes may become contaminated by a radiation release. Commercial – Some businesses within the IPZ, mainly agricultural or any of those related to food/beverage production, may be affected by an incident at the Vogtle facility. Industrial – Similar to residential buildings, most industrial buildings would not be impacted. Critical Facilities and Personnel Hospitals – Hospitals are likely to experience an increase in patients. Hospitals are likely to also require more advanced support in obtaining water and food for continuing operations. Prior to entry into the hospitals, decontamination processes for patients, visitors, vendors, and employees may be necessary. Emergency Services – Emergency services agencies and facilities may experience increased call volumes, though it is unlikely any would be exposed directly. Emergency Shelters – Emergency shelters may be opened for this event for those persons not having access to protective structures. Transportation Systems Interstates – Checkpoints and decontamination stations may be set up along routes that enter/leave the IPZ resulting in increased travel times. Airports – Similar to interstates, there may be some form of checkpoint set up to monitor contamination areas. Rail Lines – Similar to interstates, there may be some form of checkpoint set up to monitor contamination areas. Critical Utilities High Voltage Distribution Lines/ Power Lines – There are no expected impacts to the distribution system itself, although it is possible some residents may lose power due to the loss of electricity generation from a plant incident. Natural Gas – There are no expected impacts. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:113 Communication Systems and Networks Telephone Systems/Cell Towers/Internet Capabilities – There are no expected impacts. Economy Small/Local Employers – Economies within the IPZ and the area surrounding it are likely to see decreased discretionary spending. Travel and tourism may be limited for an extended period of time. Interstate commerce may be impacted as decontamination stations may need to be established and some drivers may elect to attempt to circumnavigate the affected area extending travel times and increasing the time to market for products. Large Employers – Large employers may see increased absenteeism and requests to work from home. Some employees may self-evacuate resulting in a loss of productivity. Financial Centers – In-person financial transactions are likely to be more limited, electronic transactions may increase due to the public electing not to go outside. Special Consideration Areas City Centers – Travel within the IPZ may be limited to prevent spread of contaminants. Buildings within the IPZ, may require decontamination stations for those that wish to enter the buildings. Large Event Arenas –Some events may be cancelled or rescheduled even if these arenas or zones are deemed safe. Historical and Cultural Landmarks – While no structural damage to the landmarks is likely, visitation and attendance may decrease temporarily within the IPZ, affecting some tourism and local commerce. Environment Contaminants may impact the land and water for many years. Wildlife may experience increased likelihood of cancer and other health problems. 5.21 TERRORISM 5.21.1 Background Terrorism is defined in the United States by the Code of Federal Regulations as: “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”34 Academic literature identifies some overarching political goals that terrorism seeks to achieve, including spreading anxiety and alarm among immediate victims, families, and the general public; eliminating opponents and destroying symbolic targets; and generating direct damage on society, such as affecting business confidence. In the following sections, some general background information about terrorism is presented prior to the county’s hazard identification and risk assessment findings. There are two general types of terrorist groups: network and hierarchical. The type of organization a group adopts largely depends on how long the group has existed. More recently developed groups tend to organize or adapt to the possibilities of the network model. Older, more established groups lean toward the hierarchical structure and are often more associated with violence of a political nature.35 Terrorist acts can be committed by large, formally organized groups with terrorist cells in different parts 34 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 23 C.F.R. Section 0.85 35 Terrorism Research. Terrorist groups. Retrieved December 27, 2011, from http://www.terrorism-research.com/groups/ SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:114 of the world, or they can originate from smaller groups or individuals from a small city or domestic “homegrown” location. In the United States, terrorists that are “homegrown” do not belong to a defined group, may operate very effectively “under the radar,” and may pose the biggest threat initially at the local level.36 5.21.2 Location and Spatial Extent A terror threat could potentially occur at any location in the county. However, the very definition of a terrorist event indicates that it is most likely to be targeted at a critical or symbolic resource/location/event. Ensuring and protecting the continuity of critical infrastructure and key resources (CIKR) of the United States is essential to the Nation’s security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and way of life. CIKR includes physical and/or virtual systems or assets that, if damaged, would have a detrimental impact on national security, including large-scale human casualties, property destruction, economic disruption, and significant damage to morale and public confidence. Table 5.44 lists the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) identified main critical infrastructure sectors. TABLE 5.44: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS Agriculture and Food Banking and Finance Chemical Commercial Facilities Communications Critical Manufacturing Dams Defense Industrial Base Emergency Services Energy Government Facilities Healthcare and Public Health Information Technology National Monuments and Icons Nuclear Reactors, Materials, and Waste Postal and Shipping Transportation Systems Water Although all critical facilities (see Section 6: Vulnerability Assessment) are at a heightened level of risk in Augusta-Richmond County, there are several facilities and events in the county that have been identified as the likely primary targets. Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management maintains a list of facilities and events at elevated risk of terror threat. 5.21.3 Historical Occurrences Although there have been no major terror events in Augusta-Richmond County, there is some possibility that one could occur in the future as there have been incidents in Georgia in the past and there are several facilities/events that could be potential targets. 36 Ibid. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:115 5.21.4 Probability of Future Occurrences Augusta-Richmond County has had no recorded terrorist events. Due to no recorded incidents against the county, the probability of future occurrences of a terrorist attack is possible (between 1 and 10 percent annual probability). 5.21.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) As seen after the attacks on September 11, 2001 in New York City and Washington, D.C., there can be significant impacts far away from the site of the incident. Fear and worry about additional attacks or for loved ones in areas affected are just a couple examples of impacts that could occur. Other impacts include discrimination or changed interactions between people of differing nationalities depending on the nature and intent of the attack(s) and who perpetrated the attack(s). During and after a terrorism event, the public will be expecting services to be provided despite the uncertainty of any existing hazards or further impacts. The partnership and involvement of the media is crucial not just for public guidance information, but also for keeping the public informed of the efforts underway or of any obstacles or concerns hindering response efforts. Effective planning and partnerships developed prior to the incident will provide for smoother operations, even during times of chaos like a major terrorism incident. Agencies and organizations working together in an efficient and effective way will provide for the best chance of positive public perception in these government and nongovernmental organizations. Responders The danger to human life in a terrorist event is dependent on the form of attack utilized, as well as its location, severity, and scope. In any terror incident, responders must conduct a scene size up to determine hazards to themselves and then others. Decisions must be made about how to handle victims and those in close proximity that may have been victimized or exposed. If hazardous materials are present, it could change the strategy completely. Fear and panic will be significant in the case of a terrorist act, whether it occurs in Augusta-Richmond County or elsewhere in the state or nation. Depending on the location, the scope, and the nature of the event(s), the impacts can vary greatly and could be felt nationwide, as seen with the September 11, 2001 attacks. Response efforts could last hours, days, or potentially longer. The length of time for recovery efforts could vary as well. Collaboration at all levels can provide for the most stable, effective, and efficient effort in returning to normal activities and operations. Identification of further threats and open communication lines can prevent further harm or detriment to response and recovery operations. Continuity of Operations A terrorist event would likely have a high impact on continuity of operations, especially due to the disorder that would result and the unpredictability of this kind of event. Emergency personnel may be directly affected or targeted, which would cause definitive harm to maintaining continuity of operations. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:116 Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Building Stock Residential – Single-family dwellings are not likely to be targets for terrorism. However, any areas that have specifically targeted populations could be vulnerable to an attack. These populations may relate to a person or group’s ethnicity, religion, and socioeconomic status. Dwellings in close proximity to a target may experience indirect impacts as well. Depending on the method of attack, impacts could include stray bullets or debris from explosions. These could affect people, pets, electrical systems, or water systems, to name a few; other hazards to homes include structural collapse or fires. Lastly, the presence of chemical agents can create health hazards through dangerous reactions with water sources or building materials. Commercial – Commercial structures may be vulnerable to terrorist attacks, especially those that house companies of international or national significance. Industrial – Industrial sites are exposed to the same hazards as residential and commercial structures. However, depending on the type of industry it can have a different level of impact. Many industrial sites contain hazardous materials as well as dangerous machines or products that would pose a significant hazard to the public in a terrorism event. Hazardous Materials Facilities – Terrorism is a significant concern with any kind of hazardous material, whether the materials exist on the targeted site or if hazardous materials were introduced as the instrument of the attack. Hazardous materials and facilities require significant planning for evacuation, containment, and cleanup, and require significant resources for response operations to spills or other releases. Critical Facilities Hospitals – The primary concern with a terrorism event is the influx of patients requiring care. Terrorism may pose a specific hazard to a hospital structure itself, but it is more likely to be impacted when in close proximity to a target. Many patients could be injured or their medical condition worsened by the impacts of the terrorism event. Emergency Services – Emergency services buildings are not considered high probability targets for location terrorists to strike. In other countries, ambulance services and 9-1-1 centers have been targets; however, that pattern has not been seen here in the United States. Alternate locations should be set up so that emergency operations can continue if an emergency services facility was affected or targeted by a terrorism event. If one or more towers tied to the 9-1-1 center’s communication systems were disrupted, it could have a detrimental impact to the center’s communications to responders, leading to detrimental impacts on response operations as well. Emergency Shelters – Shelters may need to be activated in a terrorism event to house and care for displaced individuals. These shelters are unlikely to be the target of an attack. However, planning for the evacuation and migration of shelter occupants in any emergency situation can alleviate issues if a shelter is directly affected by a terrorist event. Transportation Systems Interstates – Bridges found throughout the interstate system can be targeted by terrorism. Not only would the actual structural failure affect those on, under, or near the bridge, but also the loss of its functionality would significantly hinder travel and commerce. Airports – Past experiences with terrorists using airplanes for terrorist activity suggest a need for planning and collaboration with all parties of interest including local, state, and federal agencies. Due to its proximity to the Augusta National Golf Club which is home the Masters and Augusta Regional Airport is a significant airport, offering easy access to the many events and amenities. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:117 Rail Lines – The most likely means of disrupting rail lines would be the derailing of a train, primarily by sabotage of the rail or the switching control system. Using explosives would be the simplest means because hacking into systems to cause collisions and other undesired actions to moving rail cars would be more complex operations. In addition to disrupting rail traffic, a derailing can impact other means of travel such as a nearby road or airport. The rail cars involved in an incident could contain hazardous materials, valuable goods, or passengers. Any of these would have some form of significant impact, including monetary and social costs, as well as injury, illness, or death. The response and cleanup could be lengthy as well, tying up resources and adding more costs to the overall incident. Critical Utilities High Voltage Distribution Lines/Power Lines – Damage to high voltage distribution lines could disrupt power distribution for a large area, affecting emergency response and other facets of government and business. The economic impacts may also be significant as extended outages can be especially costly and inconvenient. While there is a low likelihood of power lines being directly targeted by terrorism, they are vulnerable to being affected indirectly from other targeted buildings or objects. Power lines are prominent in most parts of Augusta-Richmond County. Natural Gas – Natural gas lines are a concern as a target for terrorists, but natural gas itself must be exposed to oxygen before it could cause an explosion. Most natural gas explosions are small and rarely deadly. The real concern is in shutting off natural gas to end consumers. Sabotage of a pipeline could disconnect a significant number of homes and businesses for considerable periods of time. Communication Systems and Networks Telephone Systems – Due to their location (generally along power distribution lines) these networks face the same hazards as power lines themselves. Targeting of phone lines would temporarily disrupt communications and slow the notification of the terrorist event and its impacts, making it a desirable option for coordinated or multifaceted attacks. These lines can be shut down or damaged with relative ease. The lines themselves can be cut, ripped down, or destroyed. Any disruption in service can be costly to the affected. Cell Phone Towers – Like telephone systems above, cell phone towers would be an effective target for disrupting communications. In order to significantly impact cell phone communications, numerous towers would need to be targeted as cell phones will simply pick up the next closest tower in the event of one being affected. Internet Capabilities – Cyberterrorism is a major concern as society continues to depend on the internet more and more as discussed in the cyberterrorism section of this plan. Economy Small/Local Employers – The economic impact of a terrorist attack can vary from minimal to severe. If the incident occurs in Augusta-Richmond County, it could hinder the local economy but may not have an impact at the national level. Tourism and some commerce could decline significantly if people, events, or businesses are hesitant to come to the area following an incident. An incident in a major city or a financial hub could affect the entire country. The events of September 11, 2001 had an immediate impact on the local and national economies. However, this event and other large scale attacks like it could drastically alter economies for generations. Large Employers – There are several large businesses that are at risk for terrorism, mainly because of their international profiles. Any of the universities located within Augusta-Richmond County could be targeted and cause significant impacts, especially if shut down for a period of time. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:118 Financial Centers – Damage to these facilities could have long-lasting impacts on the community. The loss of equipment and systems within these structures could have detrimental impacts on financial transactions. Special Consideration Areas City Centers – Terrorism would most likely occur in city centers during large public gatherings or during business hours to cause the most harm and promote the most fear. Political gatherings would be high priority targets as well. Large Event Arenas – Arenas can be targeted by terrorism, particularly during events that may have some form of political, cultural, or historical value, or simply any event with a large number of people in attendance. Historical and Cultural Landmarks – Like the other special consideration areas described above, a politically significant event or other large gathering could make a landmark more attractive to terrorists, however, there is a low likelihood of Augusta-Richmond County’s landmarks being targeted by acts of terrorism. Environment Impacts on the environment depend on the type of attack utilized by terrorists. A biological, chemical, or other hazardous material can have impacts on human, animal, and plant populations alike. The impacts can vary depending on the particular hazard(s) at play. 5.22 UTILITY FAILURE 5.22.1 Background There are a number of different types of utility failure that can cause an interruption to the daily lives of citizens and normal government operations. Among these are failures of water systems and electricity/power systems. A long-term outage of either of these systems would present significant challenges, though each would have different impacts on the public and may be the result of different precipitating events. Utility failure is defined in this plan by an interference with the availability of a power supply and/or water supply resulting in a loss of these services. Power Supply Failure A failure in the power distribution network can happen for varying reasons. Some possible examples include the physical failure of power lines due to hazards as discussed in the Critical Utilities sections throughout this document, as well as problems within the network itself including faults at a power station, shorts or overloading in a circuit(s), or physical damages at a substation. There are three different types of power outages - transient faults, brownouts, and blackouts. A transient fault is a brief outage caused by a fault in a power line. The issue is corrected when the power flow clears the faulty part of the circuit, and power is returned. A brownout occurs when voltage falls to an inadequate level. A blackout occurs when there is a complete loss in the power supply. Blackouts are generally longer lasting outages than the previous two examples and may involve significant repairs. These outages can range from minutes to weeks or more depending on the significance of the failure in the network. Water System Failure SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:119 A water failure may also happen for a number of reasons. In some cases it may be caused by flooding of water system infrastructure or may be caused by the contamination of water supplies by hazardous materials spills or farming byproducts. While most of the Earth’s surface is covered by water (70%), a mere 3% of that water is freshwater. More than 68% of this freshwater is found in glaciers and ice caps, while only .3% is found in rivers, lakes, etc. Fresh, potable water is in very limited supply, estimated to be only .08% of the Earth’s water.37 In the case of a water shortage or failure, rationing or elimination of nonessential activities or events could become viable options to limit unnecessary consumption of water during times of concern. 5.22.2 Location and Spatial Extent Due to the unpredictable nature of where exactly a power or water utility outage will occur, the entire county is considered to be equally susceptible to this hazard. However it should be noted that in more urbanized areas, the effects of an outage at a single location or facility would likely impact larger numbers of people. 5.22.3 Historical Occurrences Most of the lengthy power outages that have occurred in Augusta-Richmond County have been due to severe wind events or winter storms with ice accumulation. The area frequently experiences this type of weather throughout the year. Winter snow or ice accumulation can make travel dangerous and also cause branches, trees, and power lines to break or fall, causing power disruptions or outages in the affected area. Power outages can vary depending on the amount of precipitation, wind speed, its location on the grid, and its cause. Many of the events described under natural hazards were the cause of utility failure events. As mentioned, winter storms, thunderstorms, and hurricanes all frequently cause power or water supply failures. Therefore, in general, the history of utility failure events in the county is directly connected to these other hazards. Still, these outages do not occur only during weather-related events. For example, in 2003, the Northeast Blackout showed how vulnerable large networks are to widespread outage. An estimated 55 million people were without power after a critical failure in the system, as many power plants in Ontario, Canada and the Northeast went offline. A single cause could not be attributed to this incident, but several issues led to a cascading failure. Overload protection was unable to keep a small problem in the system from affecting other parts of the system, which led to the power outage affecting a larger area. 5.22.4 Probability of Future Occurrence Based on the number of outages that have occurred in past years, the probability of a power or water utility failure is considered possible (between 1 and 10 percent annual probability). 37 United States Geological Survey, Earth’s Water Distribution, http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/waterdistribution.html SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:120 5.22.5 Consequence Analysis People (The Public and Public Confidence) Some issues that need to be considered during a power outage include transportation tie-ups and accidents, medical emergencies, and communications disruptions. The transportation problems would likely be related to traffic lights and signals not working or from decreased visibility during the night. Medical emergencies could stem from homes not having power to operate heating and air conditioning systems, particularly during conditions of extreme temperatures. Also medical equipment that relies on power could shut off, no longer providing a patient with treatment he or she requires. Medical emergencies would also be exacerbated if there was a water utility failure. The communications issues could prevent the public from being able to call emergency services. Business disruptions could also impact services that the public wants or needs. Lastly, well pumps would not function without power unless on backup generator power. Public perception during any incident involving public utility systems depends on the impacts that are presented and how government and nongovernmental entities act. Extended, widespread outages could have the potential for pressure from the public. The media’s reporting of the incident and the response could significantly influence public expectations and perception. Passing information to the public about ongoing efforts and when service restoration can be expected could assist in maximizing the confidence and satisfaction of the public. Responders As mentioned in the General Public section, there may be issues relating to transportation, medical equipment, extreme weather temperatures, and communications issues in the event of a power/water utility outage. Any of these issues could impact the call volume for emergency responders. If communications disruptions are present, it could affect notification processes and increase response times. Until power is restored, some critical facilities may need generators to provide backup power. Lack of water availability will also pose a challenge for response officials who often need consistent sources of freshwater to perform their duties. Law enforcement may become strained if additional personnel are needed to deal with unusual circumstances such as unrest, looting, or traffic control if signals are not operating appropriately. Continuity of Operations Generally, continuity of operations can be maintained during a power or water utility outage event in Augusta-Richmond County. However, when power transmission lines go down, it can make it difficult for emergency management employees to arrive to work. Also alternative sources of water will need to be relied upon. As a result, there will likely be some disruption of operations during an outage. Built Environment (Property, Facilities, and Infrastructure) Building Stock Residential – Many residential structures do not have backup generators in place. If power fails, the residents of these homes may not be able to refrigerate their food, regulate medical equipment properly (such as oxygen), etc. until power is restored. Residents who are not on well water may be forced to find alternative sources of water to use for drinking, cooking, cleaning, etc. Commercial – Unless businesses are prepared and have generators or water backups, many business processes may be hindered or stopped. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:121 Industrial – Unless businesses are prepared and have generators or water backups, many business processes may be hindered or stopped. Hazardous Materials – In the event of power or water outage, hazardous materials facilities typically have backup systems to continue critical operations and to maintain the hazardous materials on site. However, uncontrolled processes and spills are more likely to occur if backup systems do not operate correctly during these outages. There could be tremendous economic impact to businesses or the community as a whole with extended outages; many of these facilities require a significant amount of energy to operate at normal capacity. Critical Facilities and Personnel Hospitals – Hospitals are required to have generators and sources of water backup that provide these resources during outages. Additionally, other facilities can often take in patients if needed when a particular facility is unable to provide care due to a power or water outage. Emergency Services – Like hospitals, many emergency services facilities are equipped with generators to keep power supplied for continued operations during a power outage. Some of these facilities also have backup sources of water, though these are not typically for the long-term. Mutual aid agreements are put in place to handle situations where there is not an adequate supply of operational resources. Emergency Shelters – Emergency shelters may be activated if power or water outages are widespread and prolonged. Some shelters may be located in affected areas and alternative locations may need to be considered. Transportation Systems Interstates – Power/water outages are unlikely to impact interstates significantly. Airports – Airport facilities are required to have backup power to keep key operations going during power outages. Other airports have experienced grounded flights and suspended operations as a result of a power outage until power was able to be restored. Extended outages may cause more significant impacts on flight patterns. Water outages would likely not have a major impact on airports. Rail Lines – Rail lines can be impacted by power outages if backup power sources fail. Signals at railroad crossings may not work appropriately and in more severe cases, networks may be stopped until power is restored to prevent incidents. Water supply issues will likely not have major impacts on rail lines. Critical Utilities High Voltage Distribution Lines/Power Lines – High Voltage Distribution and Power lines are directly tied to power outages. Natural Gas – The distribution of natural gas may be affected by power outages; however, the delivery of natural gas to customers is not usually dependent on external power sources. Communication Systems and Networks Telephone Systems – Telephone systems may or may not be impacted by energy/power outage. Typically, weather hazards could cause many of the outages to power, which could affect landline phones at the same time. Water outages will not impact these systems. Cell Phone Towers – Cellular telephone towers generally have backup power to function during power outages. However, depending on the presence of other hazards or lengthy outages, cell phone reception may be impacted. Water outages will not impact these systems. Internet Capabilities – Internet connections that originate from or are linked to energy sources in affected areas will likely see effects from a power outage. Water outages will not impact these systems. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:122 Economy Small/Local Employers – Extended outages could shut down businesses and have significant financial impacts depending on the area of the outage, the period of time the outage occurs, and the nature of the businesses that are affected. Large Employers – The impact that an outage would have on large employers depends on if the outage occurred during business hours. The impacts are also dependent on how long the outage lasts and if backup power/water systems are in place. Backup systems may not cover all of the business’s operations, only the critical functions, so there may still be some impact even with a backup system. Financial Centers – The impact that an outage would have on the financial centers depend on if the outage occurs during business hours. The impacts are also dependent on how long the outage lasts, though in general financial centers will not be impacted long-term. Special Consideration Areas City Centers – Power/water outages would likely tend to prevent people from visiting city centers, though there would likely not be any major long-term impacts. Large Event Arenas – Power/water outages could have a significant impact on these kinds of facilities if an event is taking place. Historical and Cultural and Landmarks – Power/water outages may impact the operation of landmarks since many of these facilities rely on electricity and water. Extended outages could provoke closings. Environment There are no expected impacts. Conclusions 5.23 CONCLUSIONS ON HAZARD RISK The hazard profiles presented in this section were developed using best available data and result in what may be considered principally a qualitative assessment as recommended by FEMA in its “How-to” guidance document titled Understanding Your Risks: Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses (FEMA Publication 386-2). It relies heavily on historical and anecdotal data, stakeholder input, and professional, experienced judgment regarding observed and/or anticipated hazard impacts. It also carefully considers the findings in other relevant plans, studies, and technical reports. 5.23.1 Hazard Extent Table 5.45 describes the extent of each natural hazard identified for Augusta-Richmond County. The extent of a hazard is defined as its severity or magnitude, as it relates to the planning area. TABLE 5.45:EXTENT OF AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY HAZARDS Natural Hazards Drought Drought extent is defined by U.S. Drought Monitor classifications which include Abnormal, Moderate, Severe, Extreme, and Exceptional Drought classifications. According to these classifications, the most severe drought condition is Exceptional. Augusta-Richmond County has received this ranking 4 times over the 17-year reporting period. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:123 Earthquake Earthquake extent can be measured by the Richter Scale and the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale (both identified above) and the distance of the epicenter from Augusta-Richmond County. According to data provided by the National Geophysical Data Center, the greatest MMI to be recorded for the county was VIII (severe) with a correlating Richter Scale measurement of approximately 6.1-6.9 (last reported on September 1, 1886). The epicenter of this earthquake was located 193.0 km away. Extreme Heat The extent of extreme heat can be defined by the maximum temperature reached. The highest temperature recorded in Augusta-Richmond County was 110.4 degrees Fahrenheit (reported in 2012). Flooding Flood extent can be measured by the amount of land and property in the floodplain as well as flood height and velocity. The amount of land in the floodplain accounts for 19.7 percent of the total land area in Augusta- Richmond County. Flood depth and velocity are recorded via United States Geological Survey stream gages throughout the county. While a gage does not exist for each participating jurisdiction, there is one at or near many areas. The greatest peak discharge recorded for the county was reported on October 2, 1929. Water reached a discharge of 350,000 cubic feet per second. The greatest gage height in the county was recorded on July 13, 2013 at 117.62 feet. Additional peak discharge readings and gage heights are in the table below. Location/Jurisdiction Date Peak Discharge (cfs) Gage Height (ft) Richmond County Augusta USGS 02196605 RAES CREEK TRIB#1 AT BOY SCOUT RD AT AUGUSTA, GA Oct. 12, 1990 3,690 10.78 USGS 02196725 OATES CREEK AT WHITE ROAD, AT AUGUSTA, GA Nov. 30, 1982 219 5.88 USGS 02196730 OATES CR AT OLD SAVANNAH ROAD, AT AUGUSTA, GA Sep. 13, 1983 339 7.57 USGS 02196760 ROCKY CREEK TRIB AT US 78&278 AT AUGUSTA, GA Oct. 12, 1990 1,110 9.60 USGS 02196850 BUTLER CR TRIB AT MEADOWBROOK DR, AT AUGUSTA, GA May 10, 1979 178 13.80 USGS 02197020 SPIRIT CREEK AT US 1, NEAR AUGUSTA, GA Jul. 19, 2005 4,070 8.27 (Aug. 18, 2013) USGS 02197000 SAVANNAH RIVER AT AUGUSTA, GA Oct. 02, 1929 350,000 117.62 (Jul. 13, 2013) SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:124 USGS 02197190 MCBEAN CREEK AT US 25, NEAR MCBEAN, GA Oct. 12, 1990 3,160 7.52 USGS 02197200 MCBEAN CREEK AT GA 56, AT MCBEAN, GA Sep. 29, 1929 9,300 11.50 Blythe N/A -- -- -- Fort Gordon USGS 02196820 BUTLER CREEK AT US 78, AT FORT GORDON, GA Oct. 12, 1990 4,700 13.30 USGS 02196835 BUTLER CREEK BELOW 7TH AVENUE, AT FT. GORDON, GA May 31, 2002 510 6.00 (Feb. 08, 2013) USGS 021970161 SPIRIT CK .35 mi DS OF McCOYS CRK AT FT GORDON,GA Apr. 28, 2011 118 5.24 (Aug. 11, 2012) Hephzibah N/A -- -- -- Hail Hail extent can be defined by the size of the hail stone. The largest hail stone reported in Augusta-Richmond County was 1.75 inches (reported most recently on September 17, 2014). It should be noted that future events may exceed this. Hurricane and Tropical Storm Hurricane extent is defined by the Saffir-Simpson Scale which classifies hurricanes into Category 1 through Category 5 (see table above). The greatest classification of hurricane to traverse within 75 miles of Augusta-Richmond County was Hurricane Gracie in 1959 which reached a maximum wind speed of 96.54 knots within the 75 mile buffer area. Infectious Disease An infectious disease threat could have large–scale effects throughout the county and may cause illness in many people. Possible impacts from a disease threat depend largely on the impacted population, but might include anything from absenteeism and loss of productivity in the workplace to death or serious illness to humans or livestock. A serious disease threat could affect many thousands of people. Lightning According to the Vaisala flash density map (see figure above), Augusta- Richmond County is located in an area that experiences 2 to 8 lightning flashes per square kilometer per year. It should be noted that future lightning occurrences may exceed these figures. Severe Winter Storm The extent of winter storms can be measured by the amount of snowfall or ice received (in inches). The greatest 24-hour snowfall reported in the county was 8.0 inches in 1973. Due to unpredictable variations in snowfall throughout the county, extent totals will vary for each participating jurisdiction and reliable data on snowfall totals is not abundantly available. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:125 Solar Flare/EMP Although there is not an extensive history of solar flares occurring and specifically impacting Augusta-Richmond County, reports from historic events outside of the county are useful and can indicate roughly the extent that might be anticipated. Based on these historic events, it is possible that the county could be impacted by an “X” class solar flare that would rate as an R5 on the radio blackout scale and would disrupt radio contact, communications equipment, and power supply for several hours. Tornado Tornado hazard extent is measured by tornado occurrences in the US provided by FEMA as well as the Fujita/Enhanced Fujita Scale (see tables above). The greatest magnitude reported in Augusta-Richmond County was an EF3 (reported on April 10, 2009). It should be noted that an EF5 tornado is possible. Wildfire Wildfire data was provided by the Georgia Forestry Commission and is reported annually by county from 2007-2016. Analyzing the data indicates the following wildfire hazard extent for the county. The greatest number of fires to occur in any year was 51 in 2011. The greatest number of acres to burn in a single year occurred in 2008 when 328 acres were burned. Although this data lists the extent that has occurred, larger and more frequent wildfires are possible throughout the county. Windstorm/Thunderstorm Thunderstorm extent is defined by the number of thunder events and wind speeds reported. The strongest recorded wind event in Augusta-Richmond County was reported on March 16, 1972 and March 7, 1996 at 75 knots (approximately 86 mph). It should be noted that future events may exceed these historical occurrences. Technological/Man-Made Hazards Chemical Hazard According to USDOT PHMSA, the largest hazardous materials incident reported in the county was 100,000 SLB released as a railway incident on September 6, 1996. It should be noted that larger events are possible. Cyberterrorism While there is seldom physical damage inflicted from a cyberterrorism event, the effects of such an event are often damaging in other ways. For example, theft, denial of service attacks, and dissemination of misinformation can all result from a cyberterror event. Moreover, these events are often aimed at shutting down IT systems which can result in loss of productivity and damage to IT infrastructure. Dam/Levee Failure Dam failure extent is defined using the State of Georgia Safe Dams Program criteria. Of the 27 dams in Augusta-Richmond County, 6 are classified as high hazard. Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Although there is no history of a nuclear accident at the Vogtle Power Plant, other events across the globe and in the United States in particular indicate that an event is possible. Since several national and international events were Level 7 events on the INES, the potential for a Level 7 event at Vogtle is possible. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:126 Terrorism There is no history of major terrorist events in Augusta-Richmond County; however, it is possible that one of these events could occur. If this were to take place, the magnitude of the event could range on the scale of critical damage with many fatalities and injuries to the population. Utility Failure There are many impacts that would occur as a result of a utility failure. Among other impacts, traffic lights could be down, residents might lose heat or air conditioning, medical equipment may be non-operational, and well pumps could be shut down limiting access to clean water. These failures could potentially be widespread, leaving tens of thousands of homes and businesses without power or water utilities. 5.23.2 Priority Risk Index In order to draw some meaningful planning conclusions on hazard risk for Augusta-Richmond County, the results of the hazard profiling process were used to generate countywide hazard classifications according to a “Priority Risk Index” (PRI). The purpose of the PRI is to categorize and prioritize all potential hazards for Augusta-Richmond County as high, moderate, or low risk. Combined with the asset inventory and quantitative vulnerability assessment provided in the next section, the summary hazard classifications generated through the use of the PRI allows for the prioritization of those high hazard risks for mitigation planning purposes, and more specifically, the identification of hazard mitigation opportunities for the jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County to consider as part of their proposed mitigation strategy. The prioritization and categorization of identified hazards for Augusta-Richmond County is based principally on the PRI, a tool used to measure the degree of risk for identified hazards in a particular planning area. The PRI is used to assist the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team in gaining consensus on the determination of those hazards that pose the most significant threat to the county based on a variety of factors. The PRI is not scientifically based, but is rather meant to be utilized as an objective planning tool for classifying and prioritizing hazard risks in Augusta-Richmond County based on standardized criteria. The application of the PRI results in numerical values that allow identified hazards to be ranked against one another (the higher the PRI value, the greater the hazard risk). PRI values are obtained by assigning varying degrees of risk to five categories for each hazard (probability, impact, spatial extent, warning time, and duration). Each degree of risk has been assigned a value (1 to 4) and an agreed upon weighting factor,38 as summarized in Table 5.46. To calculate the PRI value for a given hazard, the assigned risk value for each category is multiplied by the weighting factor. The sum of all five categories equals the final PRI value, as demonstrated in the example equation below: PRI VALUE = [(PROBABILITY x .30) + (IMPACT x .30) + (SPATIAL EXTENT x .20) + (WARNING TIME x .10) + (DURATION x .10)] According to the weighting scheme and point system applied, the highest possible value for any hazard is 4.0. When the scheme is applied for Augusta-Richmond County, the highest PRI value is 3.3 (flooding). 38 The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, based upon any unique concerns or factors for the planning area, may adjust the PRI weighting scheme during future plan updates. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:127 Prior to being finalized, PRI values for each identified hazard were reviewed and evaluated by the members of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team. TABLE 5.46: PRIORITY RISK INDEX FOR AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY PRI Category Degree of Risk Assigned Weighting Factor Level Criteria Index Value Probability Unlikely Less than 1% annual probability 1 30% Possible Between 1 and 10% annual probability 2 Likely Between 10 and 100% annual probability 3 Highly Likely 100% annual probability 4 Impact Minor Very few injuries, if any. Only minor property damage and minimal disruption on quality of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 1 30% Limited Minor injuries only. More than 10% of property in affected area damaged or destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day. 2 Critical Multiple deaths/injuries possible. More than 25% of property in affected area damaged or destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one week. 3 Catastrophic High number of deaths/injuries possible. More than 50% of property in affected area damaged or destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for 30 days or more. 4 Spatial Extent Negligible Less than 1% of area affected 1 20% Small Between 1 and 10% of area affected 2 Moderate Between 10 and 50% of area affected 3 Large Between 50 and 100% of area affected 4 Warning Time More than 24 hours Self explanatory 1 10% 12 to 24 hours Self explanatory 2 6 to 12 hours Self explanatory 3 Less than 6 hours Self explanatory 4 Duration Less than 6 hours Self explanatory 1 10% Less than 24 hours Self explanatory 2 Less than one week Self explanatory 3 More than one week Self explanatory 4 SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:128 5.23.3 Priority Risk Index Results Table 5.47 summarizes the degree of risk assigned to each category for all initially identified hazards based on the application of the PRI. Assigned risk levels were based on the detailed hazard profiles developed for this section, as well as input from the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team. The results were then used in calculating PRI values and making final determinations for the risk assessment. TABLE 5.47: SUMMARY OF PRI RESULTS FOR AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Hazard Category/Degree of Risk Probability Impact Spatial Extent Warning Time Duration PRI Score Natural Hazards Drought Highly Likely Limited Large More than 24 hours More than 1 week 3.1 Earthquake Possible Limited Moderate Less than 6 hours Less than 6 hours 2.3 Extreme Heat Highly Likely Limited Large More than 24 hours Less than 1 week 3.0 Flooding Highly Likely Critical Moderate 6 to 12 hours Less than 1 week 3.3 Hail Highly Likely Limited Small Less than 6 hours Less than 6 hours 2.7 Hurricane/Tropical Storm Likely Critical Moderate More than 24 hours Less than 1 week 2.8 Infectious Disease Possible Critical Large Less than 24 hours More than 1 week 2.7 Lightning Highly Likely Limited Small Less than 6 hours Less than 6 hours 2.7 Severe Winter Storm Likely Limited Large More than 24 hours Less than 24 hours 2.6 Solar Flare/EMP Likely Minor Large More than 24 hours Less than 24 hours 2.3 Tornado Likely Critical Moderate Less than 6 hours Less than 6 hours 2.9 Wildfire Highly Likely Limited Moderate Less than 6 hours Less than 6 hours 2.9 Windstorm/Thunderstorm Likely Limited Small Less than 6 hours Less than 1 week 2.6 Technological/Man-Made Hazards Chemical Hazard Highly Likely Critical Small Less than 6 hours Less than 24 hours 3.1 Cyberterrorism Possible Critical Small Less than 6 hours Less than 24 hours 2.5 Dam/Levee Failure Unlikely Critical Small Less than 6 hours Less than 24 hours 2.2 Nuclear Power Plant Incident Unlikely Critical Moderate 6 to 12 hours Less than 1 week 2.4 Terrorism Possible Critical Small Less than 6 hours Less than 24 hours 2.5 Utility Failure Possible Limited Moderate More than 24 hours Less than 1 week 2.2 5.24 FINAL DETERMINATIONS The conclusions drawn from the hazard profiling process for Augusta-Richmond County, including the PRI results and input from the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, resulted in the classification of risk for each identified hazard according to three categories: High Risk, Moderate Risk, and Low Risk (Table 5.48). For purposes of these classifications, risk is expressed in relative terms according to the estimated impact that a hazard will have on human life and property throughout all of Augusta-Richmond County. SECTION 5: HAZARD PROFILES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 5:129 A more quantitative analysis to estimate potential dollar losses for each hazard has been performed separately, and is described in Section 6: Vulnerability Assessment. It should be noted that although some hazards are classified below as posing low risk, their occurrence of varying or unprecedented magnitudes is still possible in some cases and their assigned classification will continue to be evaluated during future plan updates. TABLE 5.48: CONCLUSIONS ON HAZARD RISK FOR AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY HIGH RISK Flooding Chemical Hazard Drought Extreme Heat MODERATE RISK Tornado Windstorm/Thunderstorm Hurricane/Tropical Storm Hail Lightning Infectious Disease Severe Winter Storm Wildfire Cyberterrorism Terrorism LOW RISK Nuclear Power Plant Incident Solar Flare/EMP Earthquake Utility Failure Dam/Levee Failure SSEECCTTIIOONN 66 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:1 This section identifies and quantifies the vulnerability of the communities within Augusta-Richmond County to the significant hazards identified in the previous sections (Hazard Identification and Profiles). It consists of the following subsections: 6.1 Overview 6.2 Methodology 6.3 Explanation of Data Sources 6.4 Asset Inventory 6.5 Vulnerability Assessment Results 6.6 Conclusions on Hazard Vulnerability 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(2)(ii): The risk assessment shall include a description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section. The description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of: (A) The types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas; (B) An estimate of the potential losses to vulnerable structures identified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate; (C) Providing a general description of land uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions. 6.1 OVERVIEW This section builds upon the information provided in Section 4: Hazard Identification and Section 5: Hazard Profiles by identifying and characterizing an inventory of assets in Augusta-Richmond County. In addition, the potential impact and expected amount of damages caused to these assets by each identified hazard event is assessed. The primary objective of the vulnerability assessment is to quantify exposure and the potential loss estimates for each hazard. In doing so, Augusta-Richmond County and participating communities may better understand their unique risks to identified hazards and be better prepared to evaluate and prioritize specific hazard mitigation actions. This section begins with an explanation of the methodology applied to complete the vulnerability assessment, followed by a summary description of the asset inventory as compiled for communities involved in this planning process. The remainder of this section focuses on the results of the assessment conducted. 6.2 METHODOLOGY This vulnerability assessment was conducted using three distinct methodologies: (1) A stochastic risk assessment; (2) a geographic information system (GIS)-based analysis; and (3) a risk modeling software SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:2 analysis. Each approach provides estimates for the potential impact of hazards by using a common, systematic framework for evaluation, including historical occurrence information provided in the Hazard Identification and Hazard Profiles sections. A brief description of the three different approaches is provided on the following pages. 6.2.1 Stochastic Risk Assessment The stochastic risk assessment methodology was applied to analyze hazards of concern that were outside the scope of hazard risk models and the GIS-based risk assessment. This involves the consideration of annualized loss estimates and impacts of current and future buildings and populations. Annualized loss is the estimated long-term weighted average value of losses to property in any single year in a specified geographic area (i.e., municipal jurisdiction or county). This methodology is applied primarily to hazards that do not have geographically-definable boundaries and are therefore excluded from spatial analysis through GIS. A stochastic risk methodology was used for the following hazards: Cyberterrorism Drought Extreme Heat Dam/Levee Failure Hail Infectious Disease Lightning Severe Winter Storm Solar Flare/EMP Tornado Terrorism Windstorm/Thunderstorm Utility Failure All of the natural hazards listed above are considered atmospheric and have the potential to affect all current and future buildings and all populations. Likewise, because technological/man-made hazards are often unpredictable and do not have a defined area in which they are more likely to occur, all current and future buildings and populations are considered at risk. Table 6.1 provides information about all improved property in Augusta-Richmond County that is vulnerable to these hazards. Annualized loss estimates were determined using the best available data on historical losses from sources including NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center records, county and municipal hazard mitigation plans, and local knowledge. Annualized loss estimates were generated by totaling the amount of property damage over the period of time for which records were available, and calculating the average annual loss. Given the standard weighting analysis, losses can be readily compared across hazards providing an objective approach for evaluating mitigation alternatives. For a number of the technological/man-made hazards, no data with historical property damages was available. Therefore a detailed vulnerability assessment could not be completed for these hazards at this time. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:3 The results for these hazards are found at the end of this section in Table 6.16. 6.2.2 GIS-Based Analysis Other hazards have specified geographic boundaries that permit additional analysis using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). These hazards include: Chemical Hazard Flooding Nuclear Power Plant Incident Wildfire The objective of the GIS-based analysis was to determine the estimated vulnerability of structures, critical facilities, and populations for the identified hazards in Augusta-Richmond County using best available geospatial data. Digital data was collected from local, regional, state, and national sources for hazards and buildings. This included local tax assessor records for individual parcels and buildings and geo-referenced point locations for identified assets (critical facilities and infrastructure, special populations, etc.) when available. ESRI® ArcGIS™ 10.3 was used to assess hazard vulnerability utilizing digital hazard data, as well as local building data. Using these data layers, hazard vulnerability can be quantified by estimating the assessed building value for parcels and/or buildings determined to be located in identified hazard areas. The results of the analysis provided an estimate of the number of parcels, buildings, and critical facilities, as well as the estimated value of those buildings determined to be potentially at risk to the hazards with delineable geographic hazard boundaries. 6.2.3 Risk Modeling Software Analysis A risk modeling software was used for the following hazards: Earthquake Hurricane/Tropical Storm There are several models that exist to model hazards. Hazus-MH was used in this vulnerability assessment to address the aforementioned hazards. Hazus-MH Hazus-MH (“Hazus”) is a standardized loss estimation software program developed by FEMA. It is built upon an integrated GIS platform to conduct analysis at a regional level (i.e., not on a structure-by- structure basis). The Hazus risk assessment methodology is parametric, in that distinct hazard and inventory parameters (e.g., wind speed and building types) can be modeled using the software to determine the impact (i.e., damages and losses) on the built environment. The Augusta-Richmond County Risk Assessment utilized Hazus-MH to produce hazard damage loss estimations for hazards for the planning area. At the time this analysis was completed, Hazus-MH 3.2 SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:4 was used to estimate potential damages from hurricane winds earthquake hazards using Hazus-MH methodology. Although the program can also model losses for flood, it was not used in this Risk Assessment. Figure 6.1 illustrates the conceptual model of the Hazus-MH methodology. FIGURE 6.1: CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF HAZUS-MH METHODOLOGY Hazus-MH is capable of providing a variety of loss estimation results. In order to be consistent with other hazard assessments, annualized losses are presented when possible. Some additional results based on location-specific scenarios may also be presented to provide a complete picture of hazard vulnerability. Loss estimates provided in this vulnerability assessment are based on best available data and methodologies. The results are an approximation of risk. These estimates should be used to understand relative risk from hazards and potential losses. Uncertainties are inherent in any loss estimation methodology, arising in part from incomplete scientific knowledge concerning natural hazards and their effects on the built environment. Uncertainties also result from approximations and simplifications that are necessary for a comprehensive analysis (e.g., incomplete inventories, non-specific locations, demographics, or economic parameters). All conclusions are presented in “Conclusions on Hazard Vulnerability” at the end of this section. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:5 6.3 EXPLANATION OF DATA SOURCES Earthquake Hazus-MH 3.2 (as described above) was used to assess earthquake vulnerability. A level 1, probabilistic scenario to estimate annualized loss was utilized. In this scenario, several return periods (events of varying intensities) are run to determine annualized loss. Default Hazus earthquake damage functions and methodology were used to determine the probability of damage. Results are calculated at the 2010 U.S. Census tract level in Hazus and presented at the county level. Flood FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (DFIRMs) were used to determine flood vulnerability. DFIRM data can be used in ArcGIS for mapping purposes and they identify several features including floodplain boundaries and base flood elevations. Identified areas on the DFIRM represent some features of Flood Insurance Rate Maps including the 100-year flood areas (1.0-percent annual chance flood), and the 500- year flood areas (0.2-percent annual chance flood). For the vulnerability assessment, local parcel data and critical facilities were overlaid on the 100-year floodplain areas and 500-year floodplain areas. It should be noted that such an analysis does not account for building elevation. Hurricane and Tropical Storm Wind Hazus-MH 3.2 (as described above) was used to assess wind vulnerability. For the hurricane wind analysis, a probabilistic scenario was created to estimate the annualized loss damage and probable peak wind speeds in Augusta-Richmond County. Default Hazus wind speed data, damage functions, and methodology were used in to determine the probability of damage for 50-, 100-, 500-, and 1,000-year frequency events (also known as return periods) in the scenario. Results are calculated in Hazus at the 2010 U.S. Census tract level and presented at the county and municipal level. Chemical Hazard For the fixed chemical hazard analysis, Toxic Release Inventory data was used. The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) is a publicly available database from the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that contains information on toxic chemical releases and other waste management activities reported annually by certain covered industry groups as well as federal facilities. This inventory was established under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) and expanded by the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990. Each year, facilities that meet certain activity thresholds must report their releases and other waste management activities for listed toxic chemicals to EPA and to their state or tribal entity. A facility must report if it meets the following three criteria: The facility falls within one of the following industrial categories: manufacturing; metal mining; coal mining; electric generating facilities that combust coal and/or oil; chemical wholesale distributors; petroleum terminals and bulk storage facilities; RCRA Subtitle C treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities; and solvent recovery services; Has 10 or more full-time employee equivalents; and Manufactures or processes more than 25,000 pounds or otherwise uses more than 10,000 pounds of any listed chemical during the calendar year. Persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) chemicals are subject to different thresholds of 10 pounds, 100 pounds, or 0.1 grams depending on the chemical. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:6 For the mobile hazardous materials incident analysis, transportation data including major highways and railroads were obtained from the Georgia Department of Transportation. This data is ArcGIS compatible, lending itself to buffer analysis to determine risk. Nuclear Accident The data used to determine vulnerability to a nuclear accident in Augusta-Richmond County is based on the location of the Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant and buffer radii recommended by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for emergency management planning in the event of a nuclear accident. Wildfire The data used to determine vulnerability to wildfire in Augusta-Richmond County is based on GIS data called the Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment (SWRA). This data is available on the Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment website and can be downloaded and imported into ArcGIS. A specific layer, known as “Wildland Urban Interface Risk Index” (WUIRI) was used to determine vulnerability of people and property. The WUIRI is presented on a scale of 0 to -9. It combines data on housing density with the data on the impact and likelihood of a wildfire occurring in a specific area. The primary purpose of the data is to highlight areas of concern that may be conducive to mitigation actions. Due to the assumptions made, it is not a true probability. However, it does provide a comparison of risk throughout the region. 6.4 ASSET INVENTORY An inventory of geo-referenced assets within Augusta-Richmond County was compiled in order to identify and characterize those properties potentially at risk to the identified hazards.1 By understanding the type and number of assets that exist and where they are located in relation to known hazard areas, the relative risk and vulnerability for such assets can be assessed. Under this assessment, two categories of physical assets were created and then further assessed through GIS analysis. These are presented below in Section 6.4.1. 6.4.1 Physical and Improved Assets The two categories of physical assets consist of: 1. Improved Property: Includes all improved properties in Augusta-Richmond County according to local parcel and building footprint data provided by the county. The information has been expressed in terms of the number of parcels and total value that may be exposed to the identified hazards. In addition, building footprint data was available for the county and it was used to improve the overall assessment by providing a more accurate assessment of how many buildings are located in hazard areas. However, it should be noted that building footprint data has not been updated since 2007, so it likely underestimates building counts. 2. Critical Facilities: Critical facilities vary by community and the critical facilities provided by Augusta-Richmond County are used in this section. It should be noted that this listing is not inclusive of every important asset located in the county, but is focused on the most critical and it is anticipated that it may be expanded or adjusted during future plan updates. 1 While potentially not all-inclusive for the jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County, “georeferenced” assets include those assets for which specific location data is readily available for connecting the asset to a specific geographic location for purposes of GIS analysis. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:7 The following tables provide a detailed listing of the geo-referenced assets that have been identified for inclusion in the vulnerability assessment for Augusta-Richmond County. Table 6.1 lists the number of buildings, number of parcels, and total value of parcels for participating areas of Augusta-Richmond County.2 TABLE 6.1: IMPROVED PROPERTY IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Number of Buildings Number of Parcels Total Assessed Value of Parcels Augusta-Richmond County 120,998 78,483 $11,647,282,467 Blythe 733 462 $26612825 Fort Gordon* Not Available 1 $307,196,200 Hephzibah 3,950 2,017 $201,121,136 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 125,681 80,963 $12,182,212,628 *Building footprint data was not available for the Fort Gordon area and the Fort Gordon area is designated by only a single parcel in the county records. Source: Augusta-Richmond County GIS Department Table 6.2 lists the emergency management facilities, fire stations, government buildings, law enforcement facilities, medical facilities, key private sector structures, schools, transportation facilities, universities, and utilities located in Augusta-Richmond County. These facilities were identified as primary critical facilities in that they are necessary to maintain government functions and protect the life, health, safety, and welfare of citizens. These facilities were geospatially mapped and used as the basis for further geographic analysis of the hazards that could potentially affect critical facilities. Critical facility information was provided by the Augusta-Richmond County GIS department and additional contributions were made by other departments. In addition, Figure 6.2 shows the locations of the primary critical facilities in Augusta-Richmond County. Table 6.17, near the end of this section, shows a complete list of the critical facilities by name, as well as the hazards that affect each facility. As noted previously, this list may not be inclusive of every important facility in the county, but attempts to include facilities that have been determined to be most important in the wake of a disaster by local government officials. TABLE 6.2: CRITICAL FACILITY INVENTORY IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Emergency Management Fire Station Government Law Enforcement Medical Augusta-Richmond County 3 20 21 12 17 Blythe 0 1 1 1 0 Fort Gordon 0 2 0 0 2 Hephzibah 0 1 1 0 0 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 3 24 23 13 19 Source: Local Governments 2 Total value for improvements is based on tax assessor records as joined to digital parcel data.. Parcel values are updated for 2016. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:8 TABLE 6.2: CRITICAL FACILITY INVENTORY IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY (CONTINUED) Location Private Sector School Transportation University Utility Augusta-Richmond County 7 68 6 10 20 Blythe 0 1 0 0 4 Fort Gordon 0 1 0 0 0 Hephzibah 0 3 0 0 6 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 7 73 6 10 30 Source: Local Governments FIGURE 6.2: CRITICAL FACILITY LOCATIONS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Augusta-Richmond County 6.4.2 Social Vulnerability In addition to identifying those assets potentially at risk to identified hazards, it is important to identify and assess those particular segments of the resident population in Augusta-Richmond County that are potentially at risk to these hazards. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:9 Table 6.3 lists the population by jurisdiction according to 2015 American Community Survey population estimates. The total population in Augusta-Richmond County according to Census data is 201,313 persons. Additional population estimates are presented in Section 3: Community Profile. TABLE 6.3: TOTAL POPULATION IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Location Total 2010 Population Augusta-Richmond County* 196,635 Blythe 728 Hephzibah 3,950 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 201,313 *The population count for Fort Gordon is included as part of the Augusta-Richmond County total. Source: United States Census Bureau In addition, Figure 6.3 illustrates the population density by census block as it was reported by the U.S. Census Bureau in 2010. FIGURE 6.3: POPULATION DENSITY IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:10 6.4.3 Development Trends and Changes in Vulnerability Since the previous hazard mitigation plan update, Augusta-Richmond County has experienced limited growth and development. Table 6.4 shows the number of building units constructed since 2010 according to the U.S. Census American Community Survey. TABLE 6.4: HOUSING UNIT COUNTS FOR AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Jurisdiction 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 % Building Stock Built Post-2010 Augusta-Richmond County 84,348 84,575 84,601 84,649 84,925 85,103 0.9% Blythe 258 294 302 304 313 319 23.6% Hephzibah 1,492 1,440 1,551 1,466 1,481 1,532 2.7% AUGUSTA- RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 86,098 86,309 86,454 86,419 86,719 86,954 1.0% *The housing unit count for Fort Gordon is included as part of the Augusta-Richmond County total. Source: United States Census Bureau Table 6.5 shows population growth estimates for the county and municipalities from 2010 to 2015 based on the American Community Survey’s Annual Estimates of Resident Population. TABLE 6.5: POPULATION GROWTH FOR AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Jurisdiction Population Estimates (as of July 1) % Change 2010-2015 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Augusta-Richmond County* 193,532 194,440 195,646 196,395 196,551 196,635 1.6% Blythe 635 675 657 641 691 728 14.7% Hephzibah 4,003 3,997 4,055 4,053 4,026 3,950 -1.3% AUGUSTA- RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 198,170 199,112 200,358 199,086 199,326 201,313 1.6% *The population count for Fort Gordon is included as part of the Augusta-Richmond County total. Note: July 1 population estimates from the American Community Survey were used in this table to allow comparison of annual population counts. April 1, 2010 Census estimates may have been used for other population counts throughout the plan which is why counts may differ somewhat. Source: United States Census Bureau Based on the data above, there has been a low rate of residential development in the county since 2010. That is to say, the county as a whole has been growing at a steady, even rate overall. Although Blythe has seen a substantially higher relative change in housing units and population, it should be noted that the size of the community makes annual projections difficult and the percent change statistic may exaggerate the absolute growth. There has been some population growth across Augusta-Richmond County since 2010. Since the population has increased across the county, there is now a greater number of people exposed to the SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:11 identified hazards. Therefore, population growth has impacted the county’s vulnerability since the previous local hazard mitigation plan was approved and there has been a slight increase in the overall vulnerability. It is also important to note that as development increases in the future, greater populations and more structures and infrastructure will be exposed to potential hazards if development occurs in the floodplains or other high risk areas identified in this plan. 6.5 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT RESULTS As noted earlier, only hazards with a specific geographic boundary, modeling tool, or sufficient historical data allow for further analysis. Those results are presented here. All other hazards are assumed to impact the entire planning region (e.g. drought) or, due to lack of data, analysis would not lead to credible results (e.g. terrorism). The total county exposure, and thus risk, was presented in Table 6.1. The annualized loss estimate for all hazards is presented at the end of this section in Table 6.16. The hazards presented in this subsection include: hurricane and tropical storm winds, earthquake, flood, chemical hazard, nuclear accident, and wildfire. 6.5.1 Hurricane and Tropical Storm Historical evidence indicates that Augusta-Richmond County has fairly significant risk to the hurricane and tropical storm hazard. Many hurricane tracks have come near or traversed through Augusta- Richmond County, as shown and discussed in Section 5: Hazard Profiles. Hurricanes and tropical storms can cause damage through numerous additional hazards such as flooding, erosion, tornadoes, high winds, and precipitation, thus it is difficult to estimate total potential losses from these cumulative effects. The current Hazus-MH hurricane model only analyzes hurricane winds and is not capable of modeling and estimating cumulative losses from all hazards associated with hurricanes; therefore only hurricane winds are analyzed in this section. It can be assumed that all existing and future buildings and populations are at risk to the hurricane and tropical storm hazard. Hazus-MH 3.2 was used to determine annualized losses for the county as shown below in Table 6.6. In the comparative annualized loss analysis at the end of this section, only losses to buildings are reported in order to best match annualized losses reported for other hazards. TABLE 6.6: ANNUALIZED LOSS ESTIMATIONS FOR HURRICANE WIND HAZARD Location Building Loss Contents Loss Inventory Loss Total Annualized Loss Augusta-Richmond County $1,816,000 $484,000 $5,000 $2,305,000 Source: Hazus-MH 3.2 SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:12 In addition, probable peak wind speeds were calculated in Hazus. These are shown below in Table 6.7. TABLE 6.7: PROBABLE PEAK HURRICANE/TROPICAL STORM WIND SPEEDS (MPH) Location 50-year event 100-year event 500-year event 1,000-year event Augusta-Richmond County 68.1 77.8 97.3 103.6 Blythe 66.6 75.9 95.3 100.8 Fort Gordon 66.6 75.9 95.3 100.8 Hephzibah 67.2 76.6 96.4 102.3 MAXIMUM WIND SPEED REPORTED 68.1 77.8 97.3 103.6 Source: Hazus-MH 3.2 Social Vulnerability Given equal susceptibility across Augusta-Richmond County, it is assumed that the total population is at risk to the hurricane and tropical storm hazard. Critical Facilities Given equal vulnerability across Augusta-Richmond County, all critical facilities are considered to be at risk. Some buildings may perform better than others in the face of such an event due to construction and age, among other factors. Determining individual building response is beyond the scope of this plan. However, this plan will consider mitigation actions for vulnerable structures, including critical facilities, to reduce the impacts of the hurricane wind hazard. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.17 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a hurricane event has the potential to impact many existing and future buildings, critical facilities, and populations in Augusta-Richmond County. Hurricane events can cause substantial damage in their wake including fatalities, extensive debris clean-up, and extended power outages. 6.5.2 Earthquake For the earthquake hazard vulnerability assessment, a probabilistic scenario was created to estimate the annualized loss for the county. Since the scenario is annualized, no building counts are provided. Losses reported included losses due to building damage (structural and non-structural), contents, and inventory. However, like the analysis for hurricanes, the comparative annualized loss figures at the end of this section only utilize building losses in order to provide consistency with other hazards. Table 6.8 summarizes the findings. TABLE 6.8: ANNUALIZED LOSS ESTIMATIONS FOR EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Location Structural Building Loss Non-Structural Building Loss Contents Loss Inventory Loss Total Annualized Loss Augusta-Richmond County $250,000 $750,000 $287,000 $9,000 $1,296,000 Source: Hazus-MH 3.2 Social Vulnerability It can be assumed that all existing and future populations are at risk to the earthquake hazard. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:13 Critical Facilities The Hazus probabilistic analysis indicated that no critical facilities would sustain measurable damage in an earthquake event. However, all critical facilities should be considered at-risk to minor to moderate damage, should an event occur. A list of individual critical facilities and their risk can be found in Table 6.17. In conclusion, an earthquake has the potential to impact all existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in Augusta-Richmond County. Minor earthquakes may rattle dishes and cause minimal damage while stronger earthquakes may result in structural damage. Impacts of earthquakes include debris clean-up, service disruption and, in severe cases, fatalities due to building collapse. Specific vulnerabilities for assets will be greatly dependent on their individual design and the mitigation measures in place, where appropriate. Such site-specific vulnerability determinations are outside the scope of this assessment but will be considered during future plan updates if data becomes available. Furthermore, mitigation actions to address earthquake vulnerability will be considered. 6.5.3 Flood Historical evidence indicates that Augusta-Richmond County is susceptible to flood events. A total of 24 flood events have been reported by the National Climatic Data Center, resulting in over $800,000 (2016 dollars) in property damage. Additionally, there have been over $3.3 million in claims paid to residents via the National Flood Insurance Program. In order to assess flood risk, a GIS-based analysis was used to estimate exposure to flood events using Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data in combination with local building footprints and parcel/tax assessor records for Augusta-Richmond County and each of the municipalities in this plan. The determination of value at-risk (exposure) was calculated using GIS analysis by summing the 2016 values for only those properties that were confirmed to be located within an identified floodplain. Table 6.9 presents the potential at-risk property. Both the number of buildings, parcels, and the approximate value are presented. TABLE 6.9: ESTIMATED EXPOSURE OF PARCELS/BUILDINGS TO THE FLOOD HAZARD Location 1.0-percent ACF 0.2-percent ACF Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Augusta-Richmond County 4,599 4,689 $1,128,165,630 712 1,016 $371,111,787 Blythe 0 5 $1,292,352 0 0 $0 Fort Gordon* -- -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah 131 277 $31,207,022 40 110 $17,919,255 AUGUSTA- RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 4,730 4,971 $1,160,665,004 752 1,126 $389,031,042 *Since spatial data on Fort Gordon is limited to a single parcel and associated dollar value, assessing vulnerability based on this information would either lead to an overestimate or an underestimate of countywide risk. Therefore, the Fort Gordon numbers are not included, though it should be noted that areas of Fort Gordon are located in both the 1.0 percent and 0.2 percent ACF areas. Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency DFIRM SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:14 Social Vulnerability U.S. Census 2010 population at the tract level was used for analysis to determine where areas of high population concentration intersect with flood prone areas in the county. Figure 6.4 is presented to gain a better understanding of the at-risk population. FIGURE 6.4 : POPULATION DENSITY NEAR FLOODPLAINS Source: FEMA DFIRM, United States Census 2010 Critical Facilities The critical facility analysis revealed that there are 5 critical facilities located in the either the 1.0- percent annual chance or 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain. One of these facilities is a water pump station which in some cases are necessarily located within the floodplain. The remaining four facilities are a recycling center, a government recreation facility, a private sector business, and a campground (as previously noted, this analysis does not consider building elevation, which may negate risk.) A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.17 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a flood has the potential to impact many existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in Augusta-Richmond County, though some areas are at a higher risk than others. All types of structures in a floodplain are at-risk, though elevated structures will have a reduced risk. As noted, the floodplains used in this analysis include the 100-year and 500-year FEMA regulated floodplain SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:15 boundaries. It is certainly possible that more severe events could occur beyond these boundaries and urban (flash) flooding could certainly impact additional structures. Such site-specific vulnerability determinations are outside the scope of this assessment but will be considered during future plan updates. Furthermore, areas subject to repetitive flooding should be analyzed for potential mitigation actions. 6.5.4 Hazardous Materials Incident Historical evidence indicates that Augusta-Richmond County is susceptible to chemical hazard events. A total of 339 HAZMAT incidents have been reported by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration since 1971, resulting in over $700,000 (2016 dollars) in property damage and 27 injuries. Most hazardous materials incidents that occur are contained and suppressed before destroying any property or threatening lives. However, they can have a significant negative impact. Such events can cause deaths, completely shut down facilities, and cause affected properties to be destroyed or suffer major damage. In a hazardous materials incident, solid, liquid, and/or gaseous contaminants may be released from fixed or mobile containers. Weather conditions will directly affect how the hazard develops. Certain chemicals may travel through the air or water, affecting a much larger area than the point of the incidence itself. Non-compliance with fire and building codes, as well as failure to maintain existing fire and containment features, can substantially increase the damage from a hazardous materials release. The duration of a hazardous materials incident can range from hours to days. Warning time is minimal to none. In order to conduct the vulnerability assessment for this hazard, GIS analysis was used to determine overlap areas for fixed and mobile areas with building footprints/parcels.3 In both the fixed and mobile scenarios, two sizes of buffers—0.5-mile and 1.0-mile—were used. These areas are assumed to respect the different levels of effect: immediate (primary) and secondary. Primary and secondary impact sites were selected based on guidance from the PHMSA Emergency Response Guidebook, but it should be noted that specific chemical buffer areas were not determined for each fixed site. Since many fixed sites contain multiple hazardous chemicals and also because, in the event of a mobile incident, it would be impossible to determine ahead of time what chemical was going to be released, the aforementioned standard buffer distances were universally used to determine risk areas. For the fixed site analysis, geo-referenced TRI and Tier II listed toxic sites in Augusta-Richmond County, along with buffers, were used for analysis as shown in Figure 6.5 and Figure 6.6. For the mobile analysis, the major roads (Interstate highway, U.S. highway, and State highway) and railroads, where hazardous materials are primarily transported were used for the GIS buffer analysis. Figure 6.7 and Figure 6.8 show the areas used for mobile toxic release buffer analysis. The results indicate the approximate number of parcels/buildings and improved value, as shown in Table 6.10 (TRI fixed sites), Table 6.11 (Tier II fixed sites), Table 6.12 (mobile road sites) and Table 6.13 (mobile railroad sites).4 3 This type of analysis will likely yield inflated results (generally higher than what is actually reported after an actual event). 4 Note that parcels included in the 1.0-mile analysis are also included in the 0.5-mile analysis. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:16 FIGURE 6.5: FIXED FACILITY TOXIC RELEASE INVENTORY SITES WITH BUFFERS IN AUGUSTA- RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Environmental Protection Agency TABLE 6.10: EXPOSURE OF IMPROVED PROPERTY TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (TRI FIXED SITES) Location 0.5-mile buffer 1.0-mile buffer Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Augusta-Richmond County 5,892 3,070 $713,203,483 16,560 11,173 $1,769,358,216 Blythe 0 0 $0 0 0 $0 Fort Gordon* -- -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah 0 0 $0 0 0 $0 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 5,892 3,070 $713,203,483 16,560 11,173 $1,769,358,216 *Since spatial data on Fort Gordon is limited to a single parcel and associated dollar value, assessing vulnerability based on this information would either lead to an overestimate or an underestimate of countywide risk. Therefore, the Fort Gordon numbers are not included, though it should be noted that areas of Fort Gordon are located in both the 0.5 mile and 1.0 mile hazard areas. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:17 FIGURE 6.6: FIXED FACILITY TIER II SITES WITH BUFFERS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Environmental Protection Agency TABLE 6.11: EXPOSURE OF IMPROVED PROPERTY TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (TIER II FIXED SITES) Location 0.5-mile buffer 1.0-mile buffer Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Augusta-Richmond County 38,354 26,055 $5,082,314,606 68,930 46,022 $7,696,872,527 Blythe 0 0 $0 0 0 $0 Fort Gordon* -- -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah 87 51 $7,361,428 216 92 $11,521,958 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 38,441 26,106 $5,089,676,034 69,146 46,114 $7,708,394,485 *Since spatial data on Fort Gordon is limited to a single parcel and associated dollar value, assessing vulnerability based on this information would either lead to an overestimate or an underestimate of countywide risk. Therefore, the Fort Gordon numbers are not included, though it should be noted that areas of Fort Gordon are located in both the 0.5 mile and 1.0 mile hazard areas. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:18 FIGURE 6.7: MOBILE HAZMAT BUFFERS FOR ROADS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: United States Department of Transportation TABLE 6.12: EXPOSURE OF IMPROVED PROPERTY TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SPILL (MOBILE ANALYSIS - ROAD) Location 0.5-mile buffer 1.0-mile buffer Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Augusta-Richmond County 62,886 41,732 $6,554,380,151 92,984 61,338 $8,827,413,010 Blythe 670 440 $334,823,236 735 478 $336,660,070 Fort Gordon* -- -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah 1,219 656 $69,381,547 1,934 1,105 $132,357,178 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 64,775 42,828 $6,958,584,934 95,653 62,921 $9,296,430,258 *Since spatial data on Fort Gordon is limited to a single parcel and associated dollar value, assessing vulnerability based on this information would either lead to an overestimate or an underestimate of countywide risk. Therefore, the Fort Gordon numbers are not included, though it should be noted that areas of Fort Gordon are located in both the 0.5 mile and 1.0 mile hazard areas. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:19 FIGURE 6.8: MOBILE HAZMAT BUFFERS FOR RAILROADS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: United States Department of Transportation TABLE 6.13: EXPOSURE OF IMPROVED PROPERTY TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SPILL (MOBILE ANALYSIS - RAILROAD) Location 0.5-mile buffer 1.0-mile buffer Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Augusta-Richmond County 38,817 26,570 $4,158,890,954 64,744 42,527 $6,366,051,365 Blythe 0 0 $0 0 0 $0 Fort Gordon* -- -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah 851 488 $47,345,791 1,230 721 $84,593,990 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 39,668 27,058 $4,206,236,745 65,974 43,248 $6,450,645,355 *Since spatial data on Fort Gordon is limited to a single parcel and associated dollar value, assessing vulnerability based on this information would either lead to an overestimate or an underestimate of countywide risk. Therefore, the Fort Gordon numbers are not included, though it should be noted that areas of Fort Gordon are located in both the 0.5 mile and 1.0 mile hazard areas. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:20 Social Vulnerability Given high susceptibility across Augusta-Richmond County, it is assumed that the total population is at risk to hazardous materials incidents. It should be noted that areas of population concentration may be at an elevated risk due to a greater burden to evacuate population quickly. Critical Facilities Fixed Site Analysis: The critical facility analysis for fixed TRI sites revealed that there are 40 facilities located in a hazard risk zone. The primary impact zone includes 12 facilities of the following types: one government, one law enforcement, two private sector, three schools, one transportation, one university, and three utility. The remaining facilities are in the secondary, 1.0-mile, zone. The critical facility analysis for fixed Tier II sites revealed that there are 135 facilities located in a hazard risk zone. The primary impact zone includes 102 facilities. The remaining facilities are in the secondary, 1.0-mile, zone. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.17 at the end of this section. Mobile Analysis: The critical facility analysis for road and railroad transportation corridors revealed that there are 166 critical facilities located in the primary and secondary mobile HAZMAT buffer areas for roads and 128 critical facilities located in the railroad HAZMAT buffer areas. The primary impact zone for roads includes 130 facilities and the primary impact zone for railroads includes 92 facilities. It should be noted that many of the facilities located in the buffer areas for railroad are also located in the buffer areas for road. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.17 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a hazardous material incident has the potential to impact many existing and future buildings, critical facilities, and populations in Augusta-Richmond County. Those areas in a primary buffer are at the highest risk, though all areas carry some vulnerability due to variations in conditions that could alter the impact area such direction and speed of wind, volume of release, etc. 6.5.5 Nuclear Accident The location of Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant southeast of Augusta-Richmond County demonstrates that the county is at some risk to the effects of a nuclear accident. Although there have not been any major events at this plant in the past, there have been major events at other nuclear stations around the country. Additionally, smaller scale incidents at Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant have occurred. In order to assess nuclear risk, a GIS-based analysis was used to estimate exposure during a nuclear event within each of the risk zones described in Section 5: Hazard Profiles. The determination of assessed value at-risk (exposure) was calculated using GIS analysis by summing the total values for those properties that were confirmed to be located within one of the risk zones. Table 6.14 presents potential at-risk properties in the 10-mile and 50-mile buffer zones. The number of buildings, parcels, and the approximate value are presented. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:21 TABLE 6.14: ESTIMATED EXPOSURE OF PARCELS/BUILDINGS TO A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT Location 10-mile buffer 50-mile buffer Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Augusta-Richmond County 0 3 $2,716,529 120,990 78,420 $11,018,916,286 Blythe 0 0 $0 735 478 $336,660,070 Fort Gordon* -- -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah 0 0 $0 3,956 2,063 $212,243,872 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 0 3 $2,716,529 125,681 80,961 $11,567,820,228 Source: International Atomic Energy Agency Social Vulnerability Since a small area in the southeast part of the county is within the 10-mile buffer area, this segment of the population is considered to be at highest risk to a nuclear accident. However, other populations in the county may also be at some risk. Critical Facilities The critical facility analysis revealed that all of 208 critical facilities are located in the 50-mile nuclear buffer area. None are located in the 10-mile buffer area. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.17 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a nuclear accident has the potential to impact many existing and future buildings, facilities, and populations in the Augusta-Richmond County, though areas in the southeast of the county are at a higher risk than others. 6.5.6 Wildfire Historical evidence indicates that Augusta-Richmond County is susceptible to wildfire events. An annual average of 38 wildfires were reported by the Georgia Forestry Commission from 2007 to 2016. To estimate exposure to wildfire, the approximate number of parcels and their associated improved value was determined using GIS analysis. For the critical facility analysis, areas of risk were intersected with critical facility locations. Figure 6.9 shows the Wildland Urban Interface Risk Index (WUIRI) data, which is a data layer that shows a rating of the potential impact of a wildfire on people and their homes. The key input, Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), reflects housing density (houses per acre) consistent with Federal Register National standards. The location of people living in the WUI and rural areas is key information for defining potential wildfire impacts to people and homes. Initially provided as raster data, it was converted to a polygon to allow for analysis. The Wildland Urban Interface Risk Index data ranges from 0 to -9 with lower values being most severe (as noted previously, this is only a measure of relative risk). Figure 6.10 shows the areas of analysis where any grid cell is less than -5. Areas with a value below -5 were chosen to be displayed as areas of risk because this showed the upper echelon of the scale and the areas at highest risk. Table 6.15 shows the results of the analysis. SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:22 FIGURE 6.9: WUI RISK INDEX AREAS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment Data SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:23 FIGURE 6.10: WILDFIRE RISK AREAS IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY Source: Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment Data TABLE 6.15: EXPOSURE OF IMPROVED PROPERTY TO WILDFIRE RISK AREAS HIGH WILDFIRE RISK AREA Location Approx. Number Buildings Approx. Number of Parcels Approx. Value of Parcels Augusta-Richmond County 13,868 14,300 $2,433,152,640 Blythe 452 364 $332,086,685 Fort Gordon* -- -- -- Hephzibah 1,379 1,193 $132,925,088 AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY TOTAL 15,699 15,857 $2,898,164,413 *Since spatial data on Fort Gordon is limited to a single parcel and associated dollar value, assessing vulnerability based on this information would either lead to an overestimate or an underestimate of countywide risk. Therefore, the Fort Gordon numbers are not included, though it should be noted that areas of Fort Gordon are located in the wildfire risk area. Social Vulnerability Although not all areas have equal vulnerability, there is some susceptibility across the entire county. According to Census block analysis, there are around 105,952 people located in blocks that are in the aforementioned wildfire risk zone. However, it is assumed that the population is at relatively low risk to SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:24 the wildfire hazard compared to many areas of the country due to the high density of development in the county. Critical Facilities The critical facility analysis revealed that there are 19 critical facilities located in the wildfire risk area (areas where the WUIRI is less than -5): one fire station, two government, four law enforcement, four medical, one private sector, three schools, one university, and three utility. However, it should also be noted, that several factors could impact the spread of a wildfire putting all facilities at some risk. A list of specific critical facilities and their associated risk can be found in Table 6.17 at the end of this section. In conclusion, a wildfire event has the potential to impact some existing and future buildings, critical facilities, and populations in Augusta-Richmond County. 6.6 CONCLUSIONS ON HAZARD VULNERABILITY The results of this vulnerability assessment are useful in at least three ways: Improving our understanding of the risk associated with the hazards in Augusta-Richmond County through better understanding of the complexities and dynamics of risk, how levels of risk can be measured and compared, and the myriad of factors that influence risk. An understanding of these relationships is critical in making balanced and informed decisions on managing the risk. Providing a baseline for policy development and comparison of mitigation alternatives. The data used for this analysis presents a current picture of risk in Augusta-Richmond County. Updating this risk “snapshot” with future data will enable comparison of the changes in risk with time. Baselines of this type can support the objective analysis of policy and program options for risk reduction in the region. Comparing the risk among the hazards addressed. The ability to quantify the risk to all these hazards relative to one another helps in a balanced, multi-hazard approach to risk management at each level of governing authority. This ranking provides a systematic framework to compare and prioritize the very disparate hazards that are present in Augusta-Richmond County. This final step in the risk assessment provides the necessary information for local officials to craft a mitigation strategy to focus resources on only those hazards that pose the most threat to Augusta-Richmond County and its municipalities. Exposure to hazards can be an indicator of vulnerability. Economic exposure can be identified through locally assessed values for improvements (buildings), and social exposure can be identified by estimating the population exposed to each hazard. This information is especially important for decision-makers to use in planning for evacuation or other public safety related needs. The types of assets included in these analyses include all building types in the participating jurisdictions. Specific information about the types of assets that are vulnerable to the identified hazards is included in each hazard subsection (for example all building types are considered at risk to the winter storm hazard and primarily residential buildings are at risk to repetitive flooding, etc.). Table 6.16 presents a summary of annualized loss for each hazard in Augusta-Richmond County. Due to the reporting of hazard damages primarily at the county level and the fact that Blythe and Hephzibah SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:25 are relatively small municipalities, it was determined that a specified annualized loss estimate for each municipality would be redundant. Therefore, annualized loss was determined using the damage reported from historical occurrences at the county level. These values should be used as an additional planning tool or measure risk for determining hazard mitigation strategies throughout the county. TABLE 6.16: ANNUALIZED LOSS FOR AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY* Event Augusta- Richmond County Natural Hazards Drought Not Available Earthquake $250,000 Extreme Heat Not Available Flooding $42,980 Hail $504 Hurricane/Tropical Storm $1,816,000 Infectious Disease Not Available Lightning $41,926 Severe Winter Storm Not Available Solar Flare/EMP Not Available Tornado $976,120 Wildfire Not Available Windstorm/Thunderstorm $71,978 Technological/Man-Made Hazards Chemical Hazard $17,154 Cyberterrorism Not Available Dam/Levee Failure Not Available Nuclear Power Plant Incident Not Available Terrorism Not Available Utility Failure Not Available *In this table, the term “Not Available” is used to indicate that no property damage for the particular hazard was recorded. This could be the case either because there were no events that caused dollar damage or because documentation of that particular type of event is not well-kept or readily available. As noted previously, all existing and future buildings and populations (including critical facilities) are vulnerable to atmospheric hazards including drought, extreme heat, hail, hurricane and tropical storm, lightning, severe winter storm, tornado, and windstorm/thunderstorm. All existing and future buildings are also vulnerable to many of the technological/man-made hazards including cyberterrorism, terrorism, and utility failure. Some buildings may be more vulnerable to these hazards based on construction and building type. Table 6.17 shows the critical facilities vulnerable to hazards analyzed in this section. The table lists those assets that are determined to be exposed to each of the identified hazards (marked with an “X”). SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:26 This Page Intentionally Left Blank SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:27 TABLE 6.17: AT-RISK CRITICAL FACILITIES IN AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Augusta-Richmond County Richmond County E9-1-1 Dispatch Emergency Management X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Emergency Management Emergency Management X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Emergency Operations Center Emergency Management X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Fire Department Fire Tower Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Regional Airport Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #10 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #11 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #12 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #13 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #15 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #16 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #17 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #18 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:28 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Fire Station #19 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #3 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #4 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #5 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #6 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #7 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #8 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station #9 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Diamond Lakes- Campground Phase 1 Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Fire Department Administration Building Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Information Technology Building Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Judicial Center Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Landfill Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Municipal Building Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Public Defenders Office Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Public Defenders Office- Relocated Office Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:29 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Bernie Ward Center Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Brigham Community Center Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Carrie J. Mays Parks Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Diamond Lakes Community Center Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Garrett Gymnasium Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X May Park Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X McDuffie Woods Park Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X New Savannah Bluff Lock & Dam Park/Boat Ramp Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RC BOE Headquarters Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Coroner Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Juvenile Court Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X W. T. Johnson Center Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Warren Road Park Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Charles B. Webster Detention Center Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X City of Hephzibah - Police Department Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Georgia Regional Youth Detention Center Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:30 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Georgia Regional Youth Development Center Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Law Enforcement Center- 38000 sq ft building Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Correctional Institution Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Marshal's Office Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Sheriff's Office Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Sheriff's Office Training Center Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Sheriff's Office, Daniel Village Substation Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Sheriff's Office, Southgate Plaza Substation Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Webster Detention Center- Phase 2 Improvements Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta University - Children's Hospital Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta University Medical Center Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center Downtown Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:31 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center Uptown Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Doctor's Hospital Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Environmental Health - Clinic Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Georgia Regional Hospital - Augusta Campus Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Gracewood State School & Hospital Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Harrington Park Health & Rehab- Skilled Nursing Facility (58 beds) Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X JMS Burn Center Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Clinic - South Augusta Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Health Department - Laney Walker Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Health Department - North Leg Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Ronald McDonald House Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Trinity Hospital Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X University Hospital Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X VA Hospital Freedom Path- Veterans Rehabilitation Housing Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:32 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Dismas Charities- Prisoner Release Halfway House Private Sector X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fresh Start for Boys- Boys Personal Care Home Private Sector X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Machine and Welding Supply Company dba Arc3 Gases South - AG Private Sector X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Nelson Brothers, LLC Private Sector X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X New Cingular Wireless PCS Private Sector X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Potters Industries, LLC Private Sector X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Westrock Augusta Recycle Private Sector X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A. Brian Merry Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A. Dorothy Hains Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A. R. Johnson Health Science and Engineering Magnet School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Academy of Richmond County High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Alleluia Community School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Alternative Education Center at Lamar School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Aquinas High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Preparatory Day School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:33 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Barton Chapel Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Bayvale Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Butler High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X C. T. Walker Magnet School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Copeland Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Craig-Houghton Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Cross Creek High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Cross Creek High School- New ROTC Building School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Curtis Baptist School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Davidson Fine Arts Magnet School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Deer Chase Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Diamond Lakes Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X East Augusta Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Ebenezer Seventh Day Adventist Junior Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Episcopal Day School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Garrett Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Glenn Hills Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Glenn Hills High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:34 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Glenn Hills Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Goshen Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Gracewood Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hillcrest Baptist School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Immaculate Conception School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Intermediate Literacy & Math Center School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Jamestown Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Jenkins-White Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Lake Forest Hills Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Lamar-Milledge Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Langford Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Lucy C. Laney High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X McBean Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Meadowbrook Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Monte Sano Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Morgan Road Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Murphey Middle School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X National Hills Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:35 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Performance Learning Center School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Pine Hill Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Reaching Potential Through Manufacturing (RPM) School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Technical Career Magnet School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Rollins Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Sands Hills Center School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Sego Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Southside Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Spirit Creek Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X St. Mary's on the Hill (St. Joseph Academy) School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Sue Reynolds Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X T. W. Josey High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Terrace Manor Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Terrell Academy School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Tobacco Road Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Tutt Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X W. S. Hornsby K-8 School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:36 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Warren Road Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Westminister Schools of Augusta School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Westside High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Wheeless Road Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Wilkinson Gardens Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Willis Foreman Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Windsor Spring Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Public Transit (Bus Service) Transportation X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Regional Airport Transportation X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Regional Airport- FBO Terminal Transportation X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X CSXT Augusta Shops Transportation X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Daniel Field Transportation X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RCBOE Transportation Transportation X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Au Corvias Student Housing- Augusta University Student Housing University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Technical College University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta University - Health Sciences Campus University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:37 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Augusta University - Summerville Campus University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta University Christenberry Fieldhouse University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Elanco Augusta Technology Center University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Paine College University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Paine College- 220 Bed Dormitory University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X University of Phoenix - Augusta Campus University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Virginia College Augusta University X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta-Richmond County Utilities Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta-Richmond County Utilities Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta-Richmond County Utilities Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta-Richmond Utilities Plant 1 Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta-Richmond Utilities Plant 2 Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta-Richmond Utilities Spirit Creek Plant 3 Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:38 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Augusta Solid Waste Natural Gas Fuel Station Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Solid Waste Natural Gas Fuel Station- Compressed Gas Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Wastewater Treatment Plant Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Water Pump Station Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Water Treatment Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Water Treatment Plant Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Augusta Water Works Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X CMC Recycling Augusta Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Comcast of Georgia/South Carolina, LLC Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Comcast of Georgia/South Carolina, LLC Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Georgia Power Company - Augusta North Leg Operating Headquarters Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X James Messerly Water Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N. Max Hicks Water Treatment Plant Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:39 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Spirit Creek Waste Water Pumping Station Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Blythe Fire Station #14 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Blythe City Hall Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Blythe Police Department Law Enforcement X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Blythe Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X City of Blythe Treatment Plant #1 (New Well) Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X City of Blythe Treatment Plant #2 (Old Well) Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X City of Blythe Water System Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X City of Blythe Water Tower Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fort Gordon Fire Station 1 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Station 2 Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Richmond County Health Department at Fort Gordon Medical X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Freedom Park Elementary School School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SECTION 6: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 6:40 NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL/MAN-MADE Dr o u g h t Ea r t h q u a k e Ex t r e m e H e a t Fl o o d i n g - 10 0 y e a r Fl o o d i n g - 50 0 y e a r Ha i l Hu r r i c a n e / T r o p i c a l S t o r m In f e c t i o u s D i s e a s e Li g h t n i n g Se v e r e W i n t e r S t o r m So l a r F l a r e / E M P To r n a d o Wi l d f i r e Wi n d s t o rm / T h u n d e r s t o r m Fi x e d T R I S i t e 0 . 5 -mi l e Fi x e d T R I S i t e 1 . 0 -mi l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 0 . 5 m i l e Fi x e d T i e r I I S i t e 1 . 0 m i l e Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r o a d ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 0 . 5 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Mo b i l e H A Z M T 1 . 0 -mi l e ( r a i l ) Cy b e r t e r r o r i s m Nu c l e a r A cc i d e n t 1 0 -mi l e Nu c l e a r A c c i d e n t 5 0 -mi l e Te r r o r i s m Ut i l i t y F a i l u r e FACILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE Hephzibah Hephzibah City Hall Government X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hephzibah Fire Department Fire Station X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hephzibah Comprehensive High School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hephzibah Elementary School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hephzibah Middle School X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X City of Hephzibah Water System Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Hephzibah-Oakridge - Water Tower Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Water Tank Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Water Tank & 2 Wells Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Water Tank and Well Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Well Water Utility X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X SSEECCTTIIOONN 77 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:1 This section of the Plan discusses the capability of the jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County to implement hazard mitigation activities. It consists of the following four subsections: 7.1 What is a Capability Assessment? 7.2 Conducting the Capability Assessment 7.3 Capability Assessment Findings 7.4 Conclusions on Local Capability 7.1 WHAT IS A CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT? The purpose of conducting a capability assessment is to determine the ability of a local jurisdiction to implement a comprehensive mitigation strategy and to identify potential opportunities for establishing or enhancing specific mitigation policies, programs, or projects.1 As in any planning process, it is important to try to establish which goals, objectives, and/or actions are feasible based on an understanding of the organizational capacity of those agencies or departments tasked with their implementation. A capability assessment helps to determine which mitigation actions are practical, and likely to be implemented over time, given a local government’s planning and regulatory framework, level of administrative and technical support, amount of fiscal resources, and current political climate. A capability assessment has two primary components: 1) an inventory of a local jurisdiction’s relevant plans, ordinances, or programs already in place and 2) an analysis of its capacity to carry them out. Careful examination of local capabilities will detect any existing gaps, shortfalls, or weaknesses with ongoing government activities that could hinder proposed mitigation activities and possibly exacerbate community hazard vulnerability. A capability assessment also highlights the positive mitigation measures already in place or being implemented at the local government level, which should continue to be supported and enhanced through future mitigation efforts. The capability assessment completed for Augusta-Richmond County and its municipalities serves as a critical planning step and an integral part of the foundation for designing an effective hazard mitigation strategy. Coupled with the Risk Assessment, the Capability Assessment helps identify and target meaningful mitigation actions for incorporation in the Mitigation Strategy portion of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. It not only helps establish the goals and objectives for Augusta-Richmond County to pursue under this Plan, but it also ensures that those goals and objectives are realistically achievable under given local conditions. 1 While the Final Rule for implementing the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 does not require a local capability assessment to be completed for local hazard mitigation plans, it is a critical step in developing a mitigation strategy that meets the needs of the region while taking into account their own unique abilities. The Rule does state that a community’s mitigation strategy should be “based on existing authorities, policies, programs and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing tools” (44 CFR, Part 201.6(c)(3)). SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:2 7.2 CONDUCTING THE CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT In order to facilitate the inventory and analysis of local government capabilities for Augusta-Richmond County and its municipalities, a detailed Capability Assessment Survey was distributed to local government officials of each participating jurisdiction.2 The survey questionnaire compiled information on a variety of “capability indicators” such as existing local plans, policies, programs, or ordinances that contribute to and/or hinder the jurisdictions’ ability to implement hazard mitigation actions. Other indicators included information related to the communities’ fiscal, administrative, and technical capabilities, such as access to local budgetary and personnel resources for mitigation purposes. The current political climate, an important consideration for any local planning or decision making process, was also evaluated with respect to hazard mitigation. At a minimum, survey results provide an extensive inventory of existing local plans, ordinances, programs, and resources that are in place or under development in addition to their overall effect on hazard loss reduction. However, the survey instrument can also serve to identify gaps, weaknesses, or conflicts that the local jurisdictions can recast as opportunities for specific actions to be proposed as part of the hazard mitigation strategy. The information provided in response to the survey questionnaire was incorporated into a database for further analysis. A general scoring methodology was then applied to quantify each jurisdiction’s overall capability.3 According to the scoring system, each capability indicator was assigned a point value based on its relevance to hazard mitigation. Using this scoring methodology, a total score and an overall capability rating of “high,” “moderate,” or “limited” could be determined according to the total number of points received. These classifications are designed to provide nothing more than a general assessment of local government capability. The results of this capability assessment provide critical information for developing an effective and meaningful mitigation strategy. 7.3 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT FINDINGS The findings of the capability assessment are summarized in this Plan to provide insight into the relevant capacity of the jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County to implement hazard mitigation activities. All information is based upon the input provided by local government officials through the Capability Assessment Survey and during meetings of the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team. Since the City of Augusta operates in conjunction with Richmond County as part of a consolidated government, these communities were treated as a single entity for this assessment. Additionally, Fort Gordon was not included in this assessment since it is not an incorporated municipality. 7.3.1 Planning and Regulatory Capability Planning and regulatory capability is based on the implementation of plans, ordinances, and programs that demonstrate a local jurisdiction’s commitment to guiding and managing growth, development, and redevelopment in a responsible manner while maintaining the general welfare of the community. It includes emergency response and mitigation planning, comprehensive land use planning, and 2 The Capability Assessment Survey instrument is available in Appendix B. 3 The scoring methodology used to quantify and rank the jurisdictions’ capability can be found in Appendix B. SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:3 transportation planning; the enforcement of zoning or subdivision ordinances and building codes that regulate how land is developed and structures are built; as well as protecting environmental, historic, and cultural resources in the community. Although some conflicts can arise, these planning initiatives generally present significant opportunities to integrate hazard mitigation principles and practices into the local decision making process. This assessment is designed to provide a general overview of the key planning and regulatory tools and programs that are in place or under development for the jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County along with their potential effect on loss reduction. This information will help identify opportunities to address existing gaps, weaknesses, or conflicts with other initiatives in addition to integrating the implementation of this Plan with existing planning mechanisms where appropriate. Table 7.1 provides a summary of the relevant local plans, ordinances, and programs already in place or under development for the jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County. A checkmark () indicates that the given item is currently in place and being implemented. An asterisk (*) indicates that the given item is currently being developed for future implementation. A dagger (†) indicates that the given item is administered for that municipality by Augusta-Richmond County. Each of these local plans, ordinances, and programs should be considered available mechanisms for incorporating the requirements of the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan. TABLE 7.1: RELEVANT PLANS, ORDINANCES, AND PROGRAMS Planning/Regulatory Tool AU G U S T A - RI C H M O N D CO U N T Y Bl y t h e He p h z i b a h Hazard Mitigation Plan † † Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) * * Comprehensive Land Use Plan Floodplain Management Plan/Flood Mitigation Plan * Open Space Management Plan (Parks & Rec/Greenway Plan) Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance Natural Resource Protection Plan * Flood Response Plan * Emergency Operations Plan * Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP Accreditation) * * * SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:4 Planning/Regulatory Tool AU G U S T A - RI C H M O N D CO U N T Y Bl y t h e He p h z i b a h Continuity of Operations Plan * Evacuation Plan * Disaster Recovery Plan Capital Improvements Plan Economic Development Plan Historic Preservation Plan Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance Unified Development Ordinance Post-Disaster Redevelopment/Reconstruction Plan/Ordinance Building Code Fire Code National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) * A more detailed discussion on the jurisdictions’ planning and regulatory capability follows. 7.3.2 Emergency Management Hazard mitigation is widely recognized as one of the five mission areas of emergency management. The other four phases include prevention, protection, response, and recovery. In reality, each phase is interconnected with hazard mitigation, as Figure 7.1 suggests. Opportunities to reduce potential losses through mitigation practices are most often implemented before disaster strikes, such as the elevation of flood prone structures or the continuous enforcement of policies that prevent and regulate development that is vulnerable to hazards due to its location, design, or other characteristics. Mitigation opportunities will also be presented during immediate preparedness or response activities, such as installing storm shutters in advance of a hurricane, and certainly during the long-term recovery and redevelopment process following a hazard event. SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:5 FIGURE 7.1: THE FIVE MISSION AREAS OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency Planning for each mission area is a critical part of a comprehensive emergency management program and a key to the successful implementation of hazard mitigation actions. As a result, the Capability Assessment Survey asked several questions across a range of emergency management plans in order to assess the participating jurisdictions’ willingness to plan and their level of technical planning proficiency. Hazard Mitigation Plan: A hazard mitigation plan represents a community’s blueprint for how it intends to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and the built environment. The essential elements of a hazard mitigation plan include a risk assessment, capability assessment, and mitigation strategy. Augusta-Richmond County has previously adopted a hazard mitigation plan. Both participating municipalities were included in this plan. Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA): A THIRA is a comprehensive risk assessment process that helps a community understand its risks and estimate capability requirements. Outputs of the THIRA process can inform a variety of disaster preparedness and emergency management efforts, including emergency operations planning, mutual aid agreements, and hazard mitigation planning. Augusta-Richmond County has completed a THIRA process. Both participating municipalities are in the process of conducting a THIRA process to improve their understanding of risks and the resources required to prepare for those risks. Disaster Recovery Plan: A disaster recovery plan serves to guide the physical, social, environmental, and economic recovery and reconstruction process following a disaster. In many instances, hazard mitigation principles and practices are incorporated into local disaster recovery plans with the intent of capitalizing on opportunities to break the cycle of repetitive disaster losses. Disaster recovery plans can also lead to the preparation of disaster redevelopment policies and ordinances to be enacted following a hazard event. Augusta-Richmond County has a disaster recovery plan in place. SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:6 Emergency Operations Plan: An emergency operations plan outlines responsibilities and the means by which resources are deployed during and following an emergency or disaster. Augusta-Richmond County maintains an emergency operations plan through the city-county Emergency Management Agency. The City of Blythe has also adopted a municipal-level emergency operations plan and the City of Hephzibah is in the process of developing one. Continuity of Operations Plan: A continuity of operations plan establishes a chain of command, line of succession, and plans for backup or alternate emergency facilities in case of an extreme emergency or disaster event. Augusta-Richmond County is in the process of adopting a continuity of operations plan. Flood Response Plan: A flood response plan establishes procedures for responding to a flood emergency including coordinating and facilitating resources to minimize the impacts of flood. Augusta-Richmond County maintains a flood response plan which includes “flood fight” procedures. The City of Hephzibah is in the process of developing a municipal-level flood response plan. Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP): EMAP is the voluntary standards, assessment, and accreditation program for disaster preparedness programs. It provides emergency management programs the opportunity to be recognized for compliance with industry standards, to demonstrate accountability, and to focus attention on areas and issues where resources are needed. None of the counties or municipalities participating in this multi-jurisdictional plan has earned EMAP accreditation. However, they are all currently working toward becoming accredited. 7.3.3 General Planning The implementation of hazard mitigation activities often involves agencies and individuals beyond the emergency management profession. Stakeholders may include local planners, public works officials, economic development specialists, and others. In many instances, concurrent local planning efforts will help to achieve or complement hazard mitigation goals, even though they are not designed as such. Therefore, the Capability Assessment Survey also asked questions regarding general planning capabilities and the degree to which hazard mitigation is integrated into other on-going planning efforts in Augusta-Richmond County. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: A comprehensive land use plan establishes the overall vision for what a community wants to be and serves as a guide for future governmental decision making. Typically a comprehensive plan contains sections on demographic conditions, land use, transportation elements, and community facilities. Given the broad nature of the plan and its regulatory standing in many communities, the integration of hazard mitigation measures into the comprehensive plan can enhance the likelihood of achieving risk reduction goals, objectives, and actions. SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:7 Augusta-Richmond County has adopted a county comprehensive plan. The City of Blythe and City of Hephzibah have each adopted a municipal comprehensive plan. Capital Improvements Plan: A capital improvements plan guides the scheduling of spending on public improvements. A capital improvements plan can serve as an important mechanism for guiding future development away from identified hazard areas. Limiting public spending in hazardous areas is one of the most effective long-term mitigation actions available to local governments. The Augusta-Richmond County Utilities Department maintains a capital improvement plan. The Augusta Regional Airport also has a capital improvement plan. The City of Hephzibah has a capital improvement plan in place. Historic Preservation Plan: A historic preservation plan is intended to preserve historic structures or districts within a community. An often overlooked aspect of the historic preservation plan is the assessment of buildings and sites located in areas subject to natural hazards and the identification of ways to reduce future damages. This may involve retrofitting or relocation techniques that account for the need to protect buildings that do not meet current building standards or are within a historic district that cannot easily be relocated out of harm’s way. Although Augusta-Richmond County does not have a historic preservation plan in place, it has adopted a historic preservation ordinance and maintains a historic preservation commission. The City of Blythe has a historic preservation plan. Zoning Ordinance: Zoning represents the primary means by which land use is controlled by local governments. As part of a community’s police power, zoning is used to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of those in a given jurisdiction that maintains zoning authority. A zoning ordinance is the mechanism through which zoning is typically implemented. Since zoning regulations enable municipal governments to limit the type and density of development, a zoning ordinance can serve as a powerful tool when applied in identified hazard areas. Augusta-Richmond County includes zoning regulations as part of its local comprehensive development ordinance. The City of Blythe and the City of Hephzibah have each adopted a standalone zoning ordinance. Subdivision Ordinance: A subdivision ordinance is intended to regulate the development of residential, commercial, industrial, or other uses, including associated public infrastructure, as land is subdivided into buildable lots for sale or future development. Subdivision design that accounts for natural hazards can dramatically reduce the exposure of future development. Augusta-Richmond County includes subdivision regulations as part of its local comprehensive development ordinance. The City of Blythe and the City of Hephzibah have each adopted a standalone subdivision ordinance. SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:8 Building Codes, Permitting, and Inspections: Building codes regulate construction standards. In many communities, permits and inspections are required for new construction. Decisions regarding the adoption of building codes (that account for hazard risk), the type of permitting process required both before and after a disaster, and the enforcement of inspection protocols all affect the level of hazard risk faced by a community. The Georgia Department of Community Affairs states that local jurisdictions may adopt their own local codes; however, in order to enforce it, the proposed amendment must have been submitted to the Department of Community Affairs for review. All of the participating jurisdictions have adopted a building code. The adoption and enforcement of building codes by local jurisdictions is routinely assessed through the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) program developed by the Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO).4 In George, the Department of Community Affairs assesses the building codes and provides the minimum requirements. In conducting the assessment, ISO collects information related to personnel qualification and continuing education as well as the number of inspections performed per day. This type of information combined with local building codes is used to determine a grade for that jurisdiction. The grades range from 1 to 10 with a BCEGS grade of 1 representing exemplary commitment to building code enforcement and a grade of 10 indicating less than minimum recognized protection. Specific BCEGS rating for the participating jurisdictions can be obtained by contacting the department for building inspections within that jurisdiction. 7.3.4 Floodplain Management Flooding represents the greatest natural hazard facing the nation. At the same time, the tools available to reduce the impacts associated with flooding are among the most developed when compared to other hazard-specific mitigation techniques. In addition to approaches that cut across hazards such as education, outreach, and the training of local officials, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) contains specific regulatory measures that enable government officials to determine where and how growth occurs relative to flood hazards. Participation in the NFIP is voluntary for local governments; however, program participation is strongly encouraged by FEMA as a first step for implementing and sustaining an effective hazard mitigation program. It is therefore used as part of this assessment as a key indicator for measuring local capability. In order for a county or municipality to participate in the NFIP, they must adopt a local flood damage prevention ordinance that requires jurisdictions to follow established minimum building standards in the floodplain. These standards require that all new buildings and substantial improvements to existing buildings will be protected from damage by a 100-year flood event and that new development in the floodplain will not exacerbate existing flood problems or increase damage to other properties. A key service provided by the NFIP is the mapping of identified flood hazard areas. Once completed, the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) are used to assess flood hazard risk, regulate construction practices, 4 Participation in BCEGS is voluntary and may be declined by local governments if they do not wish to have their local building codes evaluated. SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:9 and set flood insurance rates. FIRMs are an important source of information to educate residents, government officials, and the private sector about the likelihood of flooding in their community. Table 7.2 provides NFIP policy and claim information for each participating jurisdiction in Augusta- Richmond County. TABLE 7.2: NFIP POLICY AND CLAIM INFORMATION Jurisdiction Date Joined NFIP Current Effective Map Date NFIP Policies in Force Insurance in Force Closed Claims Total Payments to Date AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY 03/04/80 07/18/11 1,041 $219,641,200 343 $3,305,029 Blythe* -- -- -- -- -- -- Hephzibah 06/25/76 09/25/09(M) 2 $392,000 0 $0 *Community does not participate in the NFIP (M) – No Elevation Determined – All Zone A, C, and X Source: NFIP Community Status information as of 12/19/16; NFIP claims and policy information as of 10/31/16 All jurisdictions listed above that are participants in the NFIP will continue to comply with all required provisions of the program and will work to adequately comply in the future utilizing a number of strategies. For example, the jurisdictions will coordinate with GEMA and FEMA to develop maps and regulations related to special flood hazard areas within their jurisdictional boundaries and, through a consistent monitoring process, will design and improve their floodplain management program in a way that reduces the risk of flooding to people and property. As noted above, one jurisdiction is not a participant in the NFIP. The City of Blythe does not participate because it currently does not have any identified flood hazard areas within its jurisdiction, so many residents would be unlikely to purchase flood insurance. Community Rating System: An additional indicator of floodplain management capability is the active participation of local jurisdictions in the Community Rating System (CRS). The CRS is an incentive-based program that encourages counties and municipalities to undertake defined flood mitigation activities that go beyond the minimum requirements of the NFIP by adding extra local measures to provide protection from flooding. All of the 18 creditable CRS mitigation activities are assigned a range of point values. As points are accumulated and reach identified thresholds, communities can apply for an improved CRS class rating. Class ratings, which range from 10 to 1, are tied to flood insurance premium reductions as shown in Table 7.3. As class rating improves (the lower the number the better), the percent reduction in flood insurance premiums for NFIP policyholders in that community increases. TABLE 7.3: CRS PREMIUM DISCOUNTS, BY CLASS CRS Class Premium Reduction 1 45% 2 40% 3 35% 4 30% SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:10 CRS Class Premium Reduction 5 25% 6 20% 7 15% 8 10% 9 5% 10 0 Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency Community participation in the CRS is voluntary. Any community that is in full compliance with the rules and regulations of the NFIP may apply to FEMA for a CRS classification better than class 10. The CRS application process has been greatly simplified over the past several years based on community comments. Changes were made with the intent to make the CRS more user-friendly and make extensive technical assistance available for communities who request it. Augusta-Richmond County is currently in the process of joining the CRS. The program will be beneficial since there are 1,041 NFIP policies in force. Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance: A flood damage prevention ordinance establishes minimum building standards in the floodplain with the intent to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions. All communities participating in the NFIP are required to adopt a local flood damage prevention ordinance. Augusta-Richmond County and the City of Hephzibah participate in the NFIP and they both have adopted flood damage prevention regulations. Floodplain Management Plan: A floodplain management plan (or a flood mitigation plan) provides a framework for action regarding corrective and preventative measures to reduce flood-related impacts. Augusta-Richmond County has adopted a floodplain management plan. The City of Hephzibah is in the process of developing a floodplain management plan. Open Space Management Plan: An open space management plan is designed to preserve, protect, and restore largely undeveloped lands in their natural state and to expand or connect areas in the public domain such as parks, greenways, and other outdoor recreation areas. In many instances, open space management practices are consistent with the goals of reducing hazard losses, such as the preservation of wetlands or other flood-prone areas in their natural state in perpetuity. Augusta-Richmond County includes an open space management plan as part of its Recreation Master Plan. The City of Hephzibah has an open space management plan in place. Stormwater Management Plan: A stormwater management plan is designed to address flooding associated with stormwater runoff. The stormwater management plan is typically focused on design and SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:11 construction measures that are intended to reduce the impact of more frequently occurring minor urban flooding. Augusta-Richmond County has adopted a stormwater management ordinance. The City of Blythe and the City of Hephzibah have both also adopted a stormwater management ordinance. 7.3.5 Administrative and Technical Capability The ability of a local government to develop and implement mitigation projects, policies, and programs is directly tied to its ability to direct staff time and resources for that purpose. Administrative capability can be evaluated by determining how mitigation-related activities are assigned to local departments and if there are adequate personnel resources to complete these activities. The degree of intergovernmental coordination among departments will also affect administrative capability for the implementation and success of proposed mitigation activities. Technical capability can generally be evaluated by assessing the level of knowledge and technical expertise of local government employees, such as personnel skilled in using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyze and assess community hazard vulnerability. The Capability Assessment Survey was used to capture information on administrative and technical capability through the identification of available staff and personnel resources. Table 7.4 provides a summary of the capability assessment results for Augusta-Richmond County with regard to relevant staff and personnel resources. A checkmark () indicates the presence of a staff member(s) in that jurisdiction with the specified knowledge or skill. A dagger (†) indicates a county-level staff member(s) provides the specified knowledge or skill to that municipality. TABLE 7.4: RELEVANT STAFF / PERSONNEL RESOURCES Staff/Personnel Resource AU G U S T A - RI C H M O N D CO U N T Y Bl y t h e He p h z i b a h Planners with knowledge of land development/land management practices Engineers or professionals trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural and/or human-caused hazards Emergency Manager Floodplain Manager SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:12 Staff/Personnel Resource AU G U S T A - RI C H M O N D CO U N T Y Bl y t h e He p h z i b a h Land Surveyors Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Staff with education or expertise to assess the community’s vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in GIS and/or Hazus Resource development staff or grant writers 7.3.6 Fiscal Capability The ability of a local government to take action is often closely associated with the amount of money available to implement policies and projects. This may take the form of outside grant funding awards or locally-based revenue and financing. The costs associated with mitigation policy and project implementation vary widely. In some cases, policies are tied primarily to staff time or administrative costs associated with the creation and monitoring of a given program. In other cases, direct expenses are linked to an actual project, such as the acquisition of flood-prone homes, which can require a substantial commitment from local, state, and federal funding sources. The Capability Assessment Survey was used to capture information on the jurisdictions’ fiscal capability through the identification of locally available financial resources. Table 7.5 provides a summary of the results for Augusta-Richmond County with regard to relevant fiscal resources. A checkmark () indicates that the given fiscal resource has previously been used to implement hazard mitigation actions. A dagger (†) indicates that the given fiscal resource is locally available for hazard mitigation purposes (including match funds for state and federal mitigation grant funds). TABLE 7.5: RELEVANT FISCAL RESOURCES Fiscal Tool/Resource AU G U S T A - RI C H M O N D CO U N T Y Bl y t h e He p h z i b a h Capital Improvement Programming † SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:13 Fiscal Tool/Resource AU G U S T A - RI C H M O N D CO U N T Y Bl y t h e He p h z i b a h Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) † † † Special Purpose Taxes (or taxing districts) † Gas/Electric Utility Fees Water/Sewer Fees † † † Stormwater Utility Fees Development Impact Fees † General Obligation, Revenue, and/or Special Tax Bonds † † Partnering Arrangements or Intergovernmental Agreements † † Other: General fund revenue 7.3.7 Political Capability One of the most difficult capabilities to evaluate involves the political will of a jurisdiction to enact meaningful policies and projects designed to reduce the impact of future hazard events. Hazard mitigation may not be a local priority or may conflict with or be seen as an impediment to other goals of the community, such as growth and economic development. Therefore, the local political climate must be considered in designing mitigation strategies as it could be the most difficult hurdle to overcome in accomplishing their adoption and implementation. The Capability Assessment Survey was used to capture information on political capability of Augusta- Richmond County. Survey respondents were asked to evaluate the level of local political support for hazard mitigation and to identify general examples of local political capability, such as guiding development away from identified hazard areas, restricting public investments or capital improvements within hazard areas, or enforcing local development standards that go beyond minimum state or federal requirements (i.e., building codes, floodplain management, etc.). The current and future political climate for supporting and advancing future hazard mitigation strategies is moderate in Augusta-Richmond County, the City of Blyth, and the City of Hephzibah. There are several existing ordinances that address natural hazards or are related to hazard mitigation such as flood damage prevention, soil erosion and sediment control, stormwater management, zoning, and subdivision. SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:14 7.4 CONCLUSIONS ON LOCAL CAPABILITY In order to form meaningful conclusions on the assessment of local capability, a quantitative scoring methodology was designed and applied to the results of the Capability Assessment Survey. The maximum number of points possible (one, two, or three) was assigned to each plan, ordinance, program, or resource based on its relevance to hazard mitigation. If a plan, ordinance, program, or resource was under development or administered for a municipality by Augusta-Richmond County, one point became the highest score possible. The maximum total number of points possible under the scoring methodology is 86, and three categories were established to classify capability level as limited (0-24 points), moderate (25-49 points), or high (50-86 points). This methodology, further described in Appendix B, attempts to assess the overall level of capability of Augusta-Richmond County to implement hazard mitigation actions. The overall capability to implement hazard mitigation actions varies among the participating jurisdictions. For planning and regulatory capability, the jurisdictions range from limited to moderate to high. There is also some variation in the administrative and technical capability among the jurisdictions with the larger jurisdictions having greater staff and technical resources. Both municipalities are in the limited range for fiscal capability while Augusta-Richmond County has more funding resources available. Table 7.6 shows the results of the capability assessment using the designed scoring methodology. The capability score is based solely on the information provided by local officials in response to the Capability Assessment Survey. According to the assessment, the average local capability score for all jurisdictions is 45.0, which falls into the moderate capability ranking. TABLE 7.6: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT RESULTS Jurisdiction Overall Capability Score Overall Capability Rating AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY 71 High Blythe 22 Limited Hephzibah 42 Moderate As previously discussed, one of the reasons for conducting a Capability Assessment is to examine local capabilities to detect any existing gaps or weaknesses within ongoing government activities that could hinder proposed mitigation activities and possibly exacerbate community hazard vulnerability. These gaps or weaknesses have been identified for each jurisdiction in the tables found throughout this section. The participating jurisdictions used the Capability Assessment as part of the basis for the Mitigation Actions that are identified in Section 9; therefore, each jurisdiction addresses their ability to expand on and improve their existing capabilities through the identification of their Mitigation Actions. SECTION 7: CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 7:15 7.4.1 Linking the Capability Assessment with the Risk Assessment and the Mitigation Strategy The conclusions of the Risk Assessment and Capability Assessment serve as the foundation for the development of a meaningful hazard mitigation strategy. During the process of identifying specific mitigation actions to pursue, the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team considered not only each jurisdiction’s level of hazard risk, but also their existing capability to minimize or eliminate that risk. SSEECCTTIIOONN 88 MITIGATION STRATEGY Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 8:1 This section of the Plan provides the blueprint for the participating jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County to follow in order to become less vulnerable to its identified hazards. It is based on general consensus of the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team and the findings and conclusions of the Capability Assessment and Risk Assessment. It consists of the following five subsections: 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Mitigation Goals 8.3 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Techniques 8.4 Selection of Mitigation Techniques for Augusta-Richmond County 8.5 Plan Update Requirement 8.1 INTRODUCTION The intent of the Mitigation Strategy is to provide Augusta-Richmond County with the goals that will serve as guiding principles for future mitigation policy and project administration, along with an analysis of mitigation techniques available to meet those goals and reduce the impact of identified hazards. It is designed to be comprehensive, strategic, and functional in nature: In being comprehensive, the development of the strategy includes a thorough review of all hazards and identifies extensive mitigation measures intended to not only reduce the future impacts of high risk hazards, but also to help the region achieve compatible economic, environmental, and social goals. In being strategic, the development of the strategy ensures that all policies and projects proposed for implementation are consistent with pre-identified, long-term planning goals. In being functional, each proposed mitigation action is linked to established priorities and assigned to specific departments or individuals responsible for their implementation with target completion deadlines. When necessary, funding sources are identified that can be used to assist in project implementation. The first step in designing the Mitigation Strategy includes the identification of mitigation goals. Mitigation goals represent broad statements that are achieved through the implementation of more specific mitigation actions. These actions include both hazard mitigation policies (such as the regulation of land in known hazard areas through a local ordinance) and hazard mitigation projects that seek to address specifically targeted hazard risks (such as the acquisition and relocation of a repetitive loss structure). The second step involves the identification, consideration, and analysis of available mitigation measures to help achieve the identified mitigation goals. This is a long-term, continuous process sustained through the development and maintenance of this Plan. Alternative mitigation measures will continue to be SECTION 8: MITIGATION STRATEGY Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 8:2 considered as future mitigation opportunities are identified, as data and technology improve, as mitigation funding becomes available, and as this Plan is maintained over time. The third and last step in designing the Mitigation Strategy is the selection and prioritization of specific mitigation actions for Augusta-Richmond County and its municipalities (provided separately in Section 9: Mitigation Action Plan). Each participating jurisdiction has its own Mitigation Action Plan (MAP) that reflects the needs and concerns of that jurisdiction. The MAP represents an unambiguous and functional plan for action and is considered to be the most essential outcome of the mitigation planning process. The MAP includes a prioritized listing of proposed hazard mitigation actions (policies and projects) for Augusta-Richmond County and its municipalities to complete. Each action has accompanying information, such as those departments or individuals assigned responsibility for implementation, potential funding sources, and an estimated target date for completion. The MAP provides those departments or individuals responsible for implementing mitigation actions with a clear roadmap that also serves as an important tool for monitoring success or progress over time. The cohesive collection of actions listed in the MAP can also serve as an easily understood menu of mitigation policies and projects for those local decision makers who want to quickly review the recommendations and proposed actions of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. In preparing each Mitigation Action Plan for Augusta-Richmond County, officials considered the overall hazard risk and capability to mitigate the effects of hazards as recorded through the risk and capability assessment process, in addition to meeting the adopted mitigation goals and unique needs of the community. 8.1.1 Mitigation Action Prioritization Prioritization of the proposed mitigation actions was based on the following six factors: Effect on overall risk to life and property Ease of implementation Political and community support A general economic cost/benefit review1 Funding availability Continued compliance with the NFIP The point of contact for each jurisdiction helped coordinate the prioritization process by reviewing each action and working with the lead agency/department responsible to determine a priority for each action using the six factors listed above. 1 Only a general economic cost/benefit review was considered by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team through the process of selecting and prioritizing mitigation actions. Mitigation actions with “high” priority were determined to be the most cost effective and most compatible with the participating jurisdictions’ unique needs. Actions with a “moderate” priority were determined to be cost-effective and compatible with jurisdictional needs, but may be more challenging to complete administratively or fiscally than “high” priority actions. Actions with a “low” priority were determined to be important community needs, but the community likely identified several potential challenges in terms of implementation (e.g. lack of funding, technical obstacles). A more detailed cost/benefit analysis will be applied to particular projects prior to the application for or obligation of funding, as appropriate. SECTION 8: MITIGATION STRATEGY Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 8:3 Using these criteria, actions were classified as high, moderate, or low priority by the participating jurisdiction officials. 8.2 MITIGATION GOALS 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(3)(i): The mitigation strategy shall include a description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. The primary goal of all local governments is to promote the public health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. In keeping with this standard, Augusta-Richmond County has developed five goal statements for local hazard mitigation planning. In developing these goals, the previous hazard mitigation plan was reviewed to determine if the goals remained applicable. The project consultant reviewed the goals and objectives from the existing plan. Many of the goals and objectives were similar and, therefore, revised goals were formulated based on commonalities found between them. Table 8.1 provides a listing of the existing mitigation goals from the previous hazard mitigation plan. TABLE 8.1: EXISTING MITIGATION GOALS Goal Goal 1 To minimize losses of life and property, and other economic losses in Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah due to tornado/windstorms/hail. Goal 2 To minimize losses of life and property, and other economic losses in Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah due to the riverine and localized flooding. Goal 3 To minimize losses of life and property, and other economic losses in Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah due to the effects of drought and extreme heat. Goal 4 To minimize losses of life and property, and other economic losses in Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah due to effects of severe winter storms. Goal 5 To minimize losses of life and property, and other economic losses in Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah due to effects of wildfire. Goal 6 To minimize losses of life and property, and other economic losses in Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah due to effects of earthquakes. Goal 7 Analyze the impacts of current policies, ordinances, and plans in Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah on community safety from natural hazard risks due to growth decisions. As a result of reviewing the existing goals and objectives, five proposed revised goals were presented to the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team for their consideration. The proposed goals were presented, reviewed, voted on, and accepted by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team at their second meeting. Each goal, purposefully broad in nature, serves to establish parameters that were used in developing mitigation actions. The Augusta-Richmond County Mitigation Goals are presented in Table 8.2. Consistent implementation of actions over time will ensure that community goals are achieved. SECTION 8: MITIGATION STRATEGY Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 8:4 TABLE 8.2: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY MITIGATION GOALS Goal Goal 1 Minimize losses of life, property, and other economic losses in Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah due to natural and technological hazards. Goal 2 Increase resilience of building stock, critical infrastructure, and essential facilities (including shelters) to the effects of natural and technological hazards. Goal 3 Increase level of protection to local population and economy from the effects of natural and technological hazards. Goal 4 Increase public awareness of the effects of natural and technological hazards. Goal 5 Ensure local policies, ordinances, and plans support community safety and minimize hazard risks due to growth decisions. 8.3 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION TECHNIQUES 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(3)(ii): The mitigation strategy shall include a section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effect of each hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. In formulating the Mitigation Strategy for Augusta-Richmond County, a wide range of activities were considered in order to help achieve the established mitigation goals, in addition to addressing any specific hazard concerns. These activities were discussed during the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team meetings. In general, all activities considered by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team can be classified under one of the following six broad categories of mitigation techniques: Prevention, Property Protection, Natural Resource Protection, Structural Projects, Emergency Services, and Public Awareness and Education. These are discussed in detail below. 8.3.1 Prevention Preventative activities are intended to keep hazard problems from getting worse, and are typically administered through government programs or regulatory actions that influence the way land is developed and buildings are built. They are particularly effective in reducing a community’s future vulnerability, especially in areas where development has not occurred or capital improvements have not been substantial. Examples of preventative activities include: Planning and zoning Building codes Open space preservation Floodplain regulations Stormwater management regulations Drainage system maintenance Capital improvements programming Riverine/fault zone setbacks SECTION 8: MITIGATION STRATEGY Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 8:5 8.3.2 Property Protection Property protection measures involve the modification of existing buildings and structures to help them better withstand the forces of a hazard, or removal of the structures from hazardous locations. Examples include: Acquisition Relocation Building elevation Critical facilities protection Retrofitting (e.g., windproofing, floodproofing, seismic design techniques, etc.) Safe rooms, shutters, shatter-resistant glass Insurance 8.3.3 Natural Resource Protection Natural resource protection activities reduce the impact of natural hazards by preserving or restoring natural areas and their protective functions. Such areas include floodplains, wetlands, steep slopes, and sand dunes. Parks, recreation, or conservation agencies and organizations often implement these protective measures. Examples include: Floodplain protection Watershed management Riparian buffers Forest and vegetation management (e.g., fire resistant landscaping, fuel breaks, etc.) Erosion and sediment control Wetland preservation and restoration Habitat preservation Slope stabilization 8.3.4 Structural Projects Structural mitigation projects are intended to lessen the impact of a hazard by modifying the environmental natural progression of the hazard event through construction. They are usually designed by engineers and managed or maintained by public works staff. Examples include: Reservoirs Dams/levees/dikes/floodwalls Diversions/detention/retention Channel modification Storm sewers SECTION 8: MITIGATION STRATEGY Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 8:6 8.3.5 Emergency Services Although not typically considered a “mitigation” technique, emergency service measures do minimize the impact of a hazard event on people and property. These commonly are actions taken immediately prior to, during, or in response to a hazard event. Examples include: Warning systems Evacuation planning and management Emergency response training and exercises Sandbagging for flood protection Installing temporary shutters for wind protection 8.3.6 Public Education and Awareness Public education and awareness activities are used to advise residents, elected officials, business owners, potential property buyers, and visitors about hazards, hazardous areas, and mitigation techniques they can use to protect themselves and their property. Examples of measures to educate and inform the public include: Outreach projects Speaker series/demonstration events Hazard map information Real estate disclosure Library materials School children educational programs Hazard expositions 8.4 SELECTION OF MITIGATION TECHNIQUES FOR AUGUSTA- RICHMOND COUNTY In order to determine the most appropriate mitigation techniques for the communities in Augusta- Richmond County, the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team thoroughly reviewed and considered the findings of the Capability Assessment and Risk Assessment to determine the best activities for their respective communities. Other considerations included the effect of each mitigation action on overall risk to life and property, its ease of implementation, its degree of political and community support, its general cost-effectiveness, and funding availability (if necessary). 8.5 PLAN UPDATE REQUIREMENT In keeping with FEMA requirements for plan updates, the Mitigation Actions identified in the previous plan were evaluated to determine their 2017 implementation status. Updates on the implementation status of each action are provided. The mitigation actions provided in Section 9: Mitigation Action Plan include the mitigation actions from the previous plans as well as any new mitigation actions proposed through the 2017 planning process. SSEECCTTIIOONN 99 MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:1 This section includes the listing of the mitigation actions proposed by the participating jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County. It consists of the following two subsections: 9.1 Overview 9.2 Mitigation Action Plans 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(3)(iii): The mitigation strategy shall include an action plan describing how the actions identified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by the local jurisdiction. 9.1 OVERVIEW As described in the previous section, the Mitigation Action Plan, or MAP, provides a functional plan of action for each jurisdiction. It is designed to achieve the mitigation goals established in Section 8: Mitigation Strategy and will be maintained on a regular basis according to the plan maintenance procedures established in Section 10: Plan Maintenance. Each proposed mitigation action has been identified as an effective measure (policy or project) to reduce hazard risk for Augusta-Richmond County. Each action is listed in the MAP in conjunction with background information such as hazard(s) addressed and relative priority. Other information provided in the MAP includes potential funding sources to implement the action should funding be required (not all proposed actions are contingent upon funding). Most importantly, implementation mechanisms are provided for each action, including the designation of a lead agency or department responsible for carrying the action out as well as a timeframe for its completion. These implementation mechanisms ensure that the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan remains a functional document that can be monitored for progress over time. The proposed actions are not listed in priority order, though each has been assigned a priority level of “high,” “moderate,” or “low” as described below and in Section 8 (page 8.2). The Mitigation Action Plan is organized by mitigation strategy category (Prevention, Property Protection, Natural Resource Protection, Structural Projects, Emergency Services, or Public Education and Awareness). The following are the key elements described in the Mitigation Action Plan: Hazard(s) Addressed—Hazard which the action addresses. Relative Priority—High, moderate, or low priority as assigned by the jurisdiction. Lead Agency/Department—Department responsible for undertaking the action. Potential Funding Sources—Local, State, or Federal sources of funds are noted here, where applicable. Implementation Schedule—Date by which the action the action should be completed. More information is provided when possible. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:2 Implementation Status (2017)—Indication of completion, progress, deferment, or no change since the previous plan. If the action is new, that will be noted here. 9.2 MITIGATION ACTION PLANS The mitigation actions proposed by each of the participating jurisdictions are listed in 11 individual MAPs on the following pages. Table 9.1 shows the location of each jurisdiction’s MAP within this section as well as the number of mitigation actions proposed by each jurisdiction. TABLE 9.1: INDIVIDUAL MAP LOCATIONS Location Page Number of Mitigation Actions Augusta-Richmond County 9:3 29 Blyth 9:16 12 Hephzibah 9:20 12 SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:3 Augusta-Richmond County Mitigation Action Plan Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) Prevention P-1 Public Tree Maintenance – Continue tree maintenance on city streets and city- owned property (reduce debris, impacts of falling). Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail; Severe Winter Storm Moderate Augusta-Richmond County with support of Recreation and Parks and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah Georgia Forestry Commission Urban and Community Forestry Grant, within existing budget 2021 Tree maintenance is an ongoing project. P-2 Drainage and Stormwater Management. Implement central database for staff to record drainage and flooding problems (build on existing software). Train staff of all departments that receive citizen calls to use the database to register appropriate information to ensure quality data. Develop method to consider the database contents in setting priorities for drainage projects and to support identification of flood mitigation opportunities. Formalize inventory of and detention basin maintenance procedures system to prioritize maintenance. Flood Low Engineering Services with support of Planning and Zoning Stormwater Utility of the City of Augusta 2021 Implementation has just started in 2016. P-3 Soil Erosion and Sediment Control. Sedimentation in waterways may be contributing to drainage problems and flooding due to the significant size and duration of four projects proposed by Georgia DOT for the upper part of the Crane Creek basin, and the high visibility of downstream flooding, request GDOT’s continued attention to exemplary sediment and erosion control practices. Communicate with City crews and contractors that City projects are to be undertaken with exemplary sediment and erosion control practices. Examine the feasibility of offering training for local Flood Low Augusta Engineering Services, License and Inspections, supported by Soil and Conservation and Planning and Zoning Additional staff and funding needed 2021 (Mitigation Action 2.1.3 in previous plan) SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:4 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) contractors to reinforce proper installation and maintenance of sediment control measures; seek cooperative partners, including the District Soil Conservation Office, Georgia DOT, and GA Department of Natural Resources. Increase frequency of inspections of sediment control measures and work with project owner/contractor to maintain effective measures throughout construction. Continue cooperative efforts with Columbia County regarding installation and maintenance of sediment and erosion control measures on active construction sites in the upper portions of waterways that drain into Augusta, with particular attention to Crane Creek, Rae’s Creek, and Butler Creek. P-4 Flood Hazard Map Revisions and Updates. Continue pursuit of City-wide revision of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps, building on the City’s new digital topography and work underway by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to prepare flood studies as part of the Flood Reduction Study (including Rocky Creek, Rae’s Creek, Crane Creek, Augusta Canal, and Phinizy Swamp), and including other studies and identified watersheds. Communicate to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources and FEMA Region IV the importance of conducting new engineering studies to produce revised maps in the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map format for incorporation into the City’s existing GIS DFIRMs. When available for local use, annotate digital map with the “lower Flood High Planning and Zoning, support Engineering, IT Within budget 2021 Preliminary Updated Maps due to the Community in Dec 2016 or early 2017, which will start the community appeal process and the necessary steps to adoption of the maps by the community. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:5 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) floodway fringe” delineation to facilitate awareness of and application of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance and to more clearly identify areas targeted for greenspace purposes. Develop a database of property owners for use in public awareness activities. P-5 Economic Analysis related to Flood Hazard and Critical Facilities. Perform economic analysis related to identifying the most effective flood mitigation projects. Utilize newly developed FEMA DFIRMs and new topography to ascertain economic impact of flooding at various frequencies. Develop several scenarios and identify the most cost-beneficial mitigation measures. Map critical facilities information using the city GIS platform. Flood Moderate Planning and Zoning / EMA, / Engineering, with support from IT ESRI Government Grant Program, seek various grants 2020 Action cannot be started until after new flood maps are adopted by the community. P-6 Policies & Procedures for Flood Mitigation Projects. Develop Flood Mitigation Project Policies and Procedures Manual. Establish systematic method for using and prioritizing funds, including a mechanism to account for changes in priorities as a function of several variables (such as the funding agency’s priorities, recent flooding, degree of damage, damage history, predicted depth of flooding, existing drainage problems, sewer infiltration, proximity to other public open space/greenspace, etc.). Continue to gather data on buildings in FEMA- mapped floodways and repetitive loss areas to have available in the post-flood period; use to target efforts for recovery, permitting, and grant application development. Obtain FEMA’s Residential Substantial Damage Estimator software Flood Moderate Planning and Zoning, other Departments/ Committee Additional funds and additional staff required, Funding sources may include FEMA Planning Grant, GDOT ISTEA Grants 2021 (Mitigation Action 2.1.6 in previous plan) SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:6 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) and maintain ability to use it to facilitate damage estimates and substantial damage determinations. Develop policy on abandoned homes in SFHA (donations, condemn, demolish, HUD funds). Examine the Corps’ database of buildings in the SFHA and pre-identify those most likely to sustain significant damage if floods equivalent to the SFHA or greater occur, i.e., those predicted to have more than 2-feet of water above the lowest floor. Coordinate with EMA and GIS Departments to determine and map areas likely to experience flooding Use the identified list to target post-flood inspections. Maintain awareness of different sources of mitigation funding (pre-disaster, post-disaster, CDBG/HOME, NFIP flood insurance claims payments, etc.). Continue to seek mitigation grant funds to implement mitigation in high priority actions. Explore with GDOT if, as part of its environmental enhancement and wetlands mitigation requirements, funding could support additional buyouts areas where the frequency of flooding indicates the hydrology would support allowing areas to return to wetland functions. Include consideration of flood mitigation opportunities in the City’s identification of projects for which ISTEA applications will be prepared, which may include projects to preserve floodway greenspace or floodplain buyouts in areas where detention is required or wetlands are desirable. P-7 The National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS) Flood High Emergency Management; Disaster Preparedness 2016/2017 Augusta, GA has started the process in 2016 to join the CRS SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:7 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) is a voluntary incentive program that recognizes and encourages community floodplain management activities that exceed the minimum NFIP requirements. As a result, flood insurance premium rates are discounted to reflect the reduced flood risk resulting from the community actions meeting the three goals of the CRS: 1) Reduce flood losses; 2)Facilitate accurate insurance rating; and 3)Promote the awareness of flood insurance. Work to improve Augusta’ CRS rating. support Planning and Zoning, Engineering, IT Coordinator will serve as CRS Coordinator until one can be hired or assigned; Additional staff needed program; CAV completed and passed 11/28/2016. P-8 Dam Safety. For State-designated Category I dams that are located in the City or on waterways that drain through the City, estimate potential impacts and determine if the downstream risks are sufficient to contact owners to encourage their development of limited emergency action plan procedures, and period inspections, that are coordinated with the City. Flood Moderate Emergency Management with support of Engineering Department, Planning and Development, and GA DNR Dam Safety Program Additional staff and funding sources needed 2021 Funding isn’t available at this time for additional staff to work on this project. P-9 Flood Mitigation Staffing. Seek new staff position to coordinate the City’s floodplain management and mitigation efforts. Functions would include: leadership for implementation and tracking of priority action items identified in the Plan; provide staff review of permit applications for floodplain development; function as the City’s Community Rating System Coordinator; develop flood mitigation policies and procedures; apply for and administer mitigation grants; coordinate the City’s interaction with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; coordinate multi-year effort to revise FIRMs; coordinate the Flood Damage Assessment Team (with L&I) for Flood High Augusta Emergency Services, Planning and Zoning Not within existing budget 2021 Funding isn’t currently available to increase staffing, however many of the Mitigation actions in this Plan aimed at reducing the impacts from flood events and flooding are dependent on funding to fill this very needed void in the government’s personnel. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:8 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) substantial damage determinations; serve as liaison with press and the public on matters related to flooding. P-10 Pre-suppression planning for city-owned Lands. Request assistance from the Georgia Forestry Commission to evaluate fire risks on City-owned parks and greenspace to develop prevention plans to improve forest health. Wildfire High Augusta and Hephzibah Fire Departments with support from EMA and Georgia Forestry Commission Georgia Forestry Urban & Community Forestry Grant, Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment Project, within existing budget 2021 No action has been taken on this item. P-11 Subdivisions & driveway access for fire vehicles. Request that the Quarterly Subdivision Regulations Review Committee consider new standards for widths of subdivision roads and shoulders, and for common driveways for multiple flagpole lots to provide safer access by larger fire trucks. Wildfire High Planning Divisions with Augusta Fire Department Within existing budget Complete This is in place and is reviewed on every site plan received by the Fire Department. P-12 Outreach and seismic inspection. Request that building inspectors conduct field verification of the building structural soundness and field operator seismic inspection of residential structures. Earthquake High Engineering and License Inspections Department Within existing budget 2021 Removed EMA. Building inspectors are in the Planning and Development Department. P-13 Conduct safe communities audit. Request that the Planning and Development Department to create a safe growth steering committee to develop vision for the community, conduct workshops, and post analysis information and reports on local government websites. Develop potential safe growth regulations, policies and processes to revise existing community documents, regulations and plans. All High Planning and Development with EMA, Engineering, and HMPC Members Within existing budget 2019 (Mitigation Action 7.1.1 in previous plan) P-14 Assess Vulnerability to Drought Risk. Gathering and analyzing water and climate data to gain a better understanding of local climate and drought history. Determine how the Drought Low Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management/ Water Utilities Department budget 2019 New action. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:9 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) community and its water sources have been impacted by droughts in the past. Property Protection PP-1 Promote enhanced anchoring of manufactured homes – making them less susceptible to tornado damages and detachment from the pad. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail Moderate Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe FEMA PA 2021 Enhanced anchoring is promoted as a preparedness action. The action taken to enhance the anchoring should be taken on by the home owner. Structural Projects SP-1 Sewer Line Infiltration and Inflow. Continue to undertake projects to identify and resolve infiltration and inflow. During wet weather and flooding conditions, water infiltrates into sewer lines and flows into the system through submerged manhole covers, based on qualitative assessment of cost/effort and long-term benefits. Flood Low Augusta Utilities City of Augusta CIP 2021 (Mitigation Action 2.1.2 in previous plan) Emergency Services ES-1 Review capacity of the existing tornado shelters, construct new ones if needed. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail Moderate Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe HMGP, PDM 2021 Existing tornado shelters do not exist in Richmond County. Funding for construction was requested in 2014 but it was not a funded project. ES-2 Debris Management Plan – Work with the cities, GEMA, FEMA, power companies, and other entities to revise and gain approval, support, and funding of existing Debris Management Plan. Note: FEMA has a guidebook for developing debris management strategies and examples from other jurisdictions are available. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail; Severe Winter Storm High Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe GEFA Grants for Communities and Solid Waste Authorities, FEMA PA, HMPG, within existing budget Complete FEMA has approved Augusta’s Debris Management Plan. ES-3 Flood Warning – Augusta’s watersheds are relatively small and respond rapidly to heavy rainfall, making it difficult to use the traditional door-to-door notification Flood Moderate Emergency Management with support of Engineering, IT, Additional personnel needed NOAA Integrated 2021 An updated list of flood prone areas is maintained by EMA, GIS, and Planning and Development. The emergency SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:10 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) to adequately warn residents to evacuate. For the same reason, placing barricades or stationing City personnel at flood-prone roads is problematic, especially in the upper reaches of watersheds. To enhance flood safety: Use GIS and flood maps to identify buildings within flood hazard areas and develop phone groups for automated, generalized flood warning announcements through 911 Messages; exercise the announcement system periodically. Explore if automated rain gages installed by Augusta Utilities as part of watershed assessments can be used to augment the City’s preparations during times when flooding is likely. Improve the list of flood-prone roads; evaluate whether the most frequently flooded areas warrant warning signs to alert the traveling public. Utilities Flood Observing and Warning System (IFLOWS – 11.450 Grant), exploring grant funds to support gages, implantation within existing budget notification system is used to alert the public of possible flooding and emergency actions if it happens. Rain gauges haven’t been purchased for these areas. Vulnerable populations need to be assessed as well as notification and potential evacuation of those vulnerable populations. ES-4 Plan for Drought. Develop a drought emergency plan. Develop criteria or triggers for drought-related actions. Develop a drought communication plan and early warning system to facilitate timely communication of relevant information to officials, decision makers, emergency managers, and the general public. Drought Low Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management/ Water Utilities Department budget 2019 New action. ES-5 Assist Vulnerable Populations. Organize an outreach plan to vulnerable populations, including establishing and promoting accessible heating or cooling centers in the community. Create a database to track those individuals at high risk of death, such as the elderly, homeless, etc. Extreme Temperatures Moderate Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management Department budget 2020 New action. ES-6 Assist Vulnerable Populations. Identify specific at-risk populations that may be Severe Winter Weather Moderate Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Department budget 2020 New action. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:11 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) exceptionally vulnerable in the event of long-term power outages. Organize outreach to vulnerable populations, including establishing and promoting accessible heating centers in the community. Management Public Education and Awareness PEA-1 Severe Storm Awareness – Continue public outreach on severe storm and tornado risks; encourage families to prepare Disaster Supply Kits; encourage people with special medial needs to notify Augusta Emergency Management Agency. Convene a working group of representatives from Augusta, Blythe, Hephzibah, and members of the public, including nonprofit and neighborhood organizations and others, to look at outreach efforts and materials provided by the National Weather Service, FEMA, the American Red Cross, and others and determine whether changes are appropriate. Expand use of Augusta’s website to make information readily available to the public. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail High Augusta-Richmond County with support of Recreation and Parks and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah State Farm Safety Grant, within existing budget Complete Emergency management currently provides readiness information to the community through various outlets, including: a community emergency ready day held every Fall, through social media, tv, and radio, on the city website, through the emergency notification system text and email, and through small group presentations. PEA-2 Public Awareness Initiative. Mitigation is a partnership and citizens are both obligated and responsible for certain actions to help reduce exposure to flooding and to improve the City’s ability to recover from flooding. To increase public awareness and responsibility, convene a work group (e.g., City departments, neighborhood associations, NRCS/SCS, Corps of Engineers, others) to prepare and implement a multi-year plan for public awareness. The Plan may contain the following actions: Encourage property owner purchase of flood Flood High Emergency Management with support Additional staff and training funds needed 2019 Emergency management currently provides readiness information to the community through various outlets, including: a community emergency ready day held every Fall, through social media, tv, and radio, on the city website, through the emergency notification system text and email, and through small group presentations. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:12 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) insurance to provide financial protection that helps personal recovery; Encourage property owner purchase of flood insurance to increase options for post- flood mitigation (because of Increased Cost of Compliance insurance coverage). Prepare articles for publication emphasizing what property owners can do to plan and prepare for floods and to reduce losses (flooded road safety, low cost mitigation measures, insurance, the automated 911 Message flood warning alerts). Coordinate with campaigns undertaken by the State (flood awareness, winter storm awareness, etc.). Develop web-based materials; link to other sites (GEMA, FEMA, Red Cross, and Extension Service). Co-op with stormwater management initiative to distribute periodic mailing to property owners along waterways to inform them of their responsibility to keep drainageways clear (don’t dump debris, yard clippings, tree limbs, etc.). Develop materials for the Planning Commission and License and Inspections to handout with permits or mailings (tailored for homeowners, business owners, and owners of vacant lands). Topics to include flood insurance, mitigation options, flood safety, permit requirements, etc. Improve consistency of communication to the public regarding flooding, prepare briefing of basic information for City staff that field calls or meet with citizens groups. Establish a hotline for citizen reports of flooding and drainage problems. Create a database to record citizens and local government SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:13 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) personnel reports of drainage issues and to document mitigation actions. Request and sponsor periodic NFIP workshops provided by others (GADNR, FEMA) for lenders, insurance agents, real estate professionals and others. To facilitate preparation of Elevation Certificates and other uses, post database of elevation benchmarks and reference marks on the City’s webpage and notify local surveyors and engineers of its availability. Conduct training to developers, contractors, citizens, and other on the preparation of Elevation Certificates. Research options to improve disclosure of flood hazards as part of the property transfer process. PEA-3 Savannah River Flood Protection and Awareness. Although there is a low probability that flood levels on the Savannah River will prompt closure of the eight breaches in the Levee, the consequences of flooding would be catastrophic. Existing residential and non-residential uses on the riverside of the levee (some on City property) may be subject to damage at higher floodwater levels. To enhance protection and awareness: Convene a City workgroup to review and revise the Emergency Levee Closure Plan. Examine lease conditions for City-owned property on the riverside of the Levee leased to private entities, for adequate language to protect the City. Consider if lessees should be notified of: the flooding risk, the City periodically conducts a levee closing exercise; and that predicted flood levels by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers may prompt the City to require evacuation. Other topics for consideration: the Flood Moderate Engineering with support from EMA and Planning Implementation of current standards and activities within existing budget; any additional activities would require additional personnel and additional budget 2021 The lead department was listed as EMA, however that plan is developed, maintained and updated by the Engineering Department. Lead Agency updated to reflect that department. A plan currently exists for levee closure. A drill is planned for March 2017. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:14 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) availability of flood insurance to cover losses (both structure and contents); the requirement to obtain permits for building improvements, additions, and repair of damage; termination of leases under certain circumstances (e.g., if buildings are substantially damaged by any cause, flood or fire, etc.). Notify owners of private property on the river side of the Levee about flooding risk, levee closing procedures, requirement to evacuate, flood insurance availability, and the requirement to obtain permits. Continue the Emergency Levee Closure Plan exercise every two years. PEA-4 Water Conservation Awareness. Augusta Utilities to continue implementation of the Water Conservation Plan; continue to comment on proposed development site and landscaping plans; continue to report on and encourage conservation and to highlight water conservation tips on its web page. The Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah will continue to follow and implement the State’s water conservation guidelines and well as water use ordinances. Drought and Extreme Heat High Augusta Utilities, Blythe, Hephzibah, County Extension Service, Georgia DNR Implementation within existing budget 2021 (Mitigation Action 3.1.1 in previous plan) PEA-5 Severe Winter Storm Awareness – Continue public outreach on severe winter storm and ice; encourage families to prepare Disaster Supply Kits; encourage people with special medical needs to notify Augusta Emergency Management Agency. Convene a working group of representatives from Augusta, Blythe, Hephzibah, and members of the public, including non-profit and neighbourhood organizations and others, to look at outreach efforts and materials provided by the National Weather Severe Winter Storm Moderate Augusta-Richmond County EMA and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah with support of Recreation and Parks NOAA Integrated Flood Overserving and Warning System (IFLOWS- 11.450 Grant), within existing budget Complete Emergency management currently provides readiness information to the community through various outlets, including: a community emergency ready day held every Fall, through social media, tv, and radio, on the city website, through the emergency notification system text and email, and through small group presentations. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:15 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) Service, FEMA, the American Red Cross, and others and determine whether changes are appropriate. Expand use of EMA and Augusta’s website to make information readily available to the public. PEA-6 Increase Awareness of Extreme Temperature Risk and Safety. Educate citizens regarding the dangers of extreme heat and cold and the steps they can take to protect themselves when extreme temperatures occur. Extreme Temperatures Moderate Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management Department budget 2020 New action. PEA-7 Conduct Lightning Awareness Programs. Develop a lightning brochure for distribution by the Recreation Department to county sports groups. Post warning signage at local parks. Teach school children about the dangers of lightning and how to take safety precautions. Lightning Low Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management/ Recreation Department budget 2020 New action. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:16 City of Blyth Mitigation Action Plan Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) Prevention P-1 Public Tree Maintenance – Continue tree maintenance on city streets and city- owned property (reduce debris, impacts of falling). Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail; Severe Winter Storm High Augusta-Richmond County with support of Recreation and Parks and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah Georgia Forestry Commission Urban and Community Forestry Grant, within existing budget 2020 Tree maintenance is an ongoing project. P-2 Economic Analysis related to Flood Hazard and Critical Facilities. Perform economic analysis related to identifying the most effective flood mitigation projects. Utilize newly developed FEMA DFIRMs and new topography to ascertain economic impact of flooding at various frequencies. Develop several scenarios and identify the most cost-beneficial mitigation measures. Map critical facilities information using the city GIS platform. Flood Low Planning and Zoning, IT ESRI Government Grant Program, seek various grants 2019 (Mitigation Action 2.1.5 in previous plan) P-3 Dam Safety. For State-designated Category I dams that are located in the City or on waterways that drain through the City, estimate potential impacts and determine if the downstream risks are sufficient to contact owners to encourage their development of limited emergency action plan procedures, and period inspections, that are coordinated with the City. Flood Moderate Emergency Management with support of Engineering Department and GA DNR Dam Safety Program Additional staff needed 2021 Funding isn’t available at this time for additional staff to work on this project. P-4 Outreach and seismic inspection. Request that building inspectors conduct field verification of the building structural soundness and field operator seismic inspection of residential structures. Earthquake High License Inspections Department Within existing budget 2021 (Mitigation Action 6.1.2 in previous plan) SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:17 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) P-5 Conduct safe communities audit. Request that the Planning and Development Department to create a safe growth steering committee to develop vision for the community, conduct workshops, and post analysis information and reports on local government websites. Develop potential safe growth regulations, policies and processes to revise existing community documents, regulations and plans. All High Planning and Development Within existing budget 2019 (Mitigation Action 7.1.1 in previous plan) P-6 Assess Vulnerability to Drought Risk. Gathering and analyzing water and climate data to gain a better understanding of local climate and drought history. Determine how the community and its water sources have been impacted by droughts in the past. Drought Low Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management/ Water Utilities Department budget 2019 New action. Property Protection PP-1 Promote enhanced anchoring of manufactured homes – making them less susceptible to tornado damages and detachment from the pad. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail Moderate Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe FEMA PA 2021 Enhanced anchoring is promoted as a preparedness action. The action take to enhance the anchoring should be taken on by the home owner. Emergency Services ES-1 Review capacity of the existing tornado shelters, construct new ones if needed. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail Moderate Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe HMGP, PDM 2021 Existing tornado shelters do not exist in Richmond County. Funding for construction was requested in 2014 but it was not a funded project. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:18 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) ES-2 Debris Management Plan – Work with the cities, GEMA, FEMA, power companies, and other entities to revise and gain approval, support, and funding of existing Debris Management Plan. Note: FEMA has a guidebook for developing debris management strategies and examples from other jurisdictions are available. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail; Severe Winter Storm High Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe GEFA Grants for Communities and Solid Waste Authorities, FEMA PA, HMPG, within existing budget Complete FEMA has approved Augusta’s Debris Management Plan. Public Education and Awareness PEA-1 Severe Storm Awareness – Continue public outreach on severe storm and tornado risks; encourage families to prepare Disaster Supply Kits; encourage people with special medial needs to notify Augusta Emergency Management Agency. Convene a working group of representatives from Augusta, Blythe, Hephzibah, and members of the public, including nonprofit and neighborhood organizations and others, to look at outreach efforts and materials provided by the National Weather Service, FEMA, the American Red Cross, and others and determine whether changes are appropriate. Expand use of Augusta’s website to make information readily available to the public. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail High Augusta-Richmond County with support of Recreation and Parks and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah State Farm Safety Grant, within existing budget Complete Emergency management currently provides readiness information to the community through various outlets, including: a community emergency ready day held every Fall, through social media, tv, and radio, on the city website, through the emergency notification system text and email, and through small group presentations. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:19 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) PEA-2 Water Conservation Awareness. Augusta Utilities to continue implementation of the Water Conservation Plan; continue to comment on proposed development site and landscaping plans; continue to report on and encourage conservation and to highlight water conservation tips on its web page. The Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah will continue to follow and implement the State’s water conservation guidelines and well as water use ordinances. Drought and Extreme Heat High Augusta Utilities, Blythe, Hephzibah, County Extension Service, Georgia DNR Implementation within existing budget 2021 (Mitigation Action 3.1.1 in previous plan) PEA-3 Severe Winter Storm Awareness – Continue public outreach on severe winter storm and ice; encourage families to prepare Disaster Supply Kits; encourage people with special medical needs to notify Augusta Emergency Management Agency. Convene a working group of representatives from Augusta, Blythe, Hephzibah, and members of the public, including non-profit and neighbourhood organizations and others, to look at outreach efforts and materials provided by the National Weather Service, FEMA, the American Red Cross, and others and determine whether changes are appropriate. Expand use of EMA and Augusta’s website to make information readily available to the public. Severe Winter Storm High Augusta-Richmond County EMA and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah with support of Recreation and Parks NOAA Integrated Flood Overserving and Warning System (IFLOWS- 11.450 Grant), within existing budget Complete Emergency management currently provides readiness information to the community through various outlets, including: a community emergency ready day held every Fall, through social media, tv, and radio, on the city website, through the emergency notification system text and email, and through small group presentations. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:20 City of Hephzibah Mitigation Action Plan Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) Prevention P-1 Public Tree Maintenance – Continue tree maintenance on city streets and city- owned property (reduce debris, impacts of falling). Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail; Severe Winter Storm High Augusta-Richmond County with support of Recreation and Parks and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah Georgia Forestry Commission Urban and Community Forestry Grant, within existing budget 2021 Tree maintenance is an ongoing project. P-2 Economic Analysis related to Flood Hazard and Critical Facilities. Perform economic analysis related to identifying the most effective flood mitigation projects. Utilize newly developed FEMA DFIRMs and new topography to ascertain economic impact of flooding at various frequencies. Develop several scenarios and identify the most cost-beneficial mitigation measures. Map critical facilities information using the city GIS platform. Flood Low Planning and Zoning, IT ESRI Government Grant Program, seek various grants 2021 (Mitigation Action 2.1.5 in previous plan) P-3 Dam Safety. For State-designated Category I dams that are located in the City or on waterways that drain through the City, estimate potential impacts and determine if the downstream risks are sufficient to contact owners to encourage their development of limited emergency action plan procedures, and period inspections, that are coordinated with the City. Flood Moderate Emergency Management with support of Engineering Department and GA DNR Dam Safety Program Additional staff needed 2021 Funding isn’t available at this time for additional staff to work on this project. P-4 Outreach and seismic inspection. Request that building inspectors conduct field verification of the building structural soundness and field operator seismic inspection of residential structures. Earthquake High License Inspections Department Within existing budget 2021 (Mitigation Action 6.1.2 in previous plan) SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:21 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) P-5 Conduct safe communities audit. Request that the Planning and Development Department to create a safe growth steering committee to develop vision for the community, conduct workshops, and post analysis information and reports on local government websites. Develop potential safe growth regulations, policies and processes to revise existing community documents, regulations and plans. All High Planning and Development Within existing budget 2019 (Mitigation Action 7.1.1 in previous plan) P-6 Assess Vulnerability to Drought Risk. Gathering and analyzing water and climate data to gain a better understanding of local climate and drought history. Determine how the community and its water sources have been impacted by droughts in the past. Drought Low Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management/ Water Utilities Department budget 2019 New action. Property Protection PP-1 Promote enhanced anchoring of manufactured homes – making them less susceptible to tornado damages and detachment from the pad. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail Moderate Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe FEMA PA 2021 Enhanced anchoring is promoted as a preparedness action. The action take to enhance the anchoring should be taken on by the home owner. Emergency Services ES-1 Review capacity of the existing tornado shelters, construct new ones if needed. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail Moderate Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe HMGP, PDM 2021 Existing tornado shelters do not exist in Richmond County. Funding for construction was requested in 2014 but it was not a funded project. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:22 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) ES-2 Debris Management Plan – Work with the cities, GEMA, FEMA, power companies, and other entities to revise and gain approval, support, and funding of existing Debris Management Plan. Note: FEMA has a guidebook for developing debris management strategies and examples from other jurisdictions are available. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail; Severe Winter Storm High Augusta-Richmond County EMA with support of the Cities of Hephzibah and Blythe GEFA Grants for Communities and Solid Waste Authorities, FEMA PA, HMPG, within existing budget Complete FEMA has approved Augusta’s Debris Management Plan. Public Education and Awareness PEA-1 Severe Storm Awareness – Continue public outreach on severe storm and tornado risks; encourage families to prepare Disaster Supply Kits; encourage people with special medial needs to notify Augusta Emergency Management Agency. Convene a working group of representatives from Augusta, Blythe, Hephzibah, and members of the public, including nonprofit and neighborhood organizations and others, to look at outreach efforts and materials provided by the National Weather Service, FEMA, the American Red Cross, and others and determine whether changes are appropriate. Expand use of Augusta’s website to make information readily available to the public. Tornado/ Windstorm/ Hail High Augusta-Richmond County with support of Recreation and Parks and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah State Farm Safety Grant, within existing budget Complete Emergency management currently provides readiness information to the community through various outlets, including: a community emergency ready day held every Fall, through social media, tv, and radio, on the city website, through the emergency notification system text and email, and through small group presentations. SECTION 9: MITIGATION ACTION PLAN Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 9:23 Action # Description Hazard(s) Addressed Relative Priority Lead Agency/ Department Potential Funding Sources Implementation Schedule Implementation Status (2017) PEA-2 Water Conservation Awareness. Augusta Utilities to continue implementation of the Water Conservation Plan; continue to comment on proposed development site and landscaping plans; continue to report on and encourage conservation and to highlight water conservation tips on its web page. The Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah will continue to follow and implement the State’s water conservation guidelines and well as water use ordinances. Drought and Extreme Heat High Augusta Utilities, Blythe, Hephzibah, County Extension Service, Georgia DNR Implementation within existing budget 2021 (Mitigation Action 3.1.1 in previous plan) PEA-3 Severe Winter Storm Awareness – Continue public outreach on severe winter storm and ice; encourage families to prepare Disaster Supply Kits; encourage people with special medical needs to notify Augusta Emergency Management Agency. Convene a working group of representatives from Augusta, Blythe, Hephzibah, and members of the public, including non-profit and neighbourhood organizations and others, to look at outreach efforts and materials provided by the National Weather Service, FEMA, the American Red Cross, and others and determine whether changes are appropriate. Expand use of EMA and Augusta’s website to make information readily available to the public. Severe Winter Storm High Augusta-Richmond County EMA and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah with support of Recreation and Parks NOAA Integrated Flood Overserving and Warning System (IFLOWS- 11.450 Grant), within existing budget Complete Emergency management currently provides readiness information to the community through various outlets, including: a community emergency ready day held every Fall, through social media, tv, and radio, on the city website, through the emergency notification system text and email, and through small group presentations. SSEECCTTIIOONN 1100 PLAN MAINTENANCE Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 10:1 This section discusses how the Augusta-Richmond County Mitigation Strategy and Mitigation Action Plan will be implemented and how the Hazard Mitigation Plan will be evaluated and enhanced over time. This section also discusses how the public will continue to be involved in a sustained hazard mitigation planning process. It consists of the following three subsections: 10.1 Monitoring and Evaluating the Previous Plan 10.2 Implementation and Integration 10.3 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Enhancement 10.4 Continued Public Involvement 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part201.6(c)(4)(i): The plan shall include a plan maintenance process that includes a section describing the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating and updating the mitigation plan within a five-year cycle. 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(4)(ii): The plan maintenance process shall include a process by which local governments incorporate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, when appropriate. 10.1 MONITORING AND EVALUATING THE PREVIOUS PLAN Since the previous plan was adopted, each jurisdiction has worked to ensure that mitigation was integrated into local activities and that the mitigation plan was appropriately implemented. The participants jointly outlined a process in the previous mitigation plan for monitoring and evaluating the plan throughout the interim period between plan updates. All participants were ultimately successful in implementing the monitoring and evaluation processes that were outlined in previous plan as all participating jurisdictions participated in annual meetings to discuss the mitigation plan and the priorities that were outlined in it. The specific process is outlined below with an explanation of how the monitoring and evaluating process was carried out as well as any changes that were identified that would be useful to implement during the next update. Augusta-Richmond County The Augusta-Richmond County and the Cities of Blythe and Hephzibah Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan included a review process and progress report on the plan. The Augusta-Richmond County Planning Commission and the Augusta Emergency Management Agency were charged with monitoring the plan and mitigation activities and preparing annual progress reports. Meetings held between the Emergency Management Agency, community stakeholders, and the agencies assigned lead functions reported on the status of implementation, including obstacles to progress and recommended solutions. Reports were compiled into a single document and submitted to the Georgia Emergency Management Agency and all stakeholders. SECTION 10: PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 10:2 In addition to the annual report, a meeting was convened after damage-causing natural hazard events to review the effects of the hazard events. These after action reports were incorporated into the community LEOP and supporting response functions. Based on evaluation of those effects, adjustments to the mitigation actions and priorities were made and additional event-specific actions identified for inclusion in the Joint Comprehensive Plan Short Term Work Program, Flood Mitigation Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and Green Space Program. Although there were some minor revisions made to the plan during the interim update period, there were few major revisions identified during this time and the HMP planning team generally agreed that the plan was on course and that the monitoring and evaluating process itself was sufficient to ensure implementation of the plan. The planning team noted that while reporting was done on the progress of the plan through the interim review period on a bi-annual basis. The HMP planning team met following an event that occurred and a noted deficiency was the failure of the team to meet on an annual basis and discuss any needed updates to the plan. The HMP planning team will meet in the future on an annual basis as well as after an emergency event to implement any changes. 10.2 IMPLEMENTATION AND INTEGRATION Each agency, department, or other partner participating under the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan is responsible for implementing specific mitigation actions as prescribed in the Mitigation Action Plan. Every proposed action listed in the Mitigation Action Plan is assigned to a specific “lead” agency or department in order to assign responsibility and accountability and increase the likelihood of subsequent implementation. In addition to the assignment of a local lead department or agency, an implementation time period or a specific implementation date has been assigned in order to assess whether actions are being implemented in a timely fashion. When applicable, potential funding sources have been identified for proposed actions listed in the Mitigation Action Plan. The participating jurisdictions will integrate this Hazard Mitigation Plan into relevant government decision-making processes or mechanisms, where feasible. This includes integrating the requirements of the Hazard Mitigation Plan into other local planning documents, processes, or mechanisms, such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, when appropriate. The members of the Augusta- Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team will remain charged with ensuring that the goals and mitigation actions of new and updated local planning documents for their agencies or departments are consistent, or do not conflict with, the goals and actions of the Hazard Mitigation Plan, and will not contribute to increased hazard vulnerability in Augusta-Richmond County. Since the previous plan was adopted, each jurisdiction has worked to integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms where applicable/feasible. Examples of how this integration has occurred have been documented in the Implementation Status discussion provided for each of the mitigation actions found in Section 9. Specific examples of how integration has occurred include: Integrating the mitigation plan into reviews and updates of floodplain management ordinances; SECTION 10: PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 10:3 Integrating the mitigation plan into reviews and updates of emergency operations plans; Integrating the mitigation plan into review and updates of building codes; and Integrating the mitigation plan into capital improvements plans through the identification of mitigation actions that require local funding Opportunities to further integrate the requirements of this Plan into other local planning mechanisms shall continue to be identified through future meetings of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team and the review process described herein. Although it is recognized that there are many possible benefits to integrating components of this Plan into other local planning mechanisms, the development and maintenance of this stand-alone Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan is deemed by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team to be the most effective and appropriate method to implement local hazard mitigation actions at this time. 10.3 MONITORING, EVALUATION, AND ENHANCEMENT Periodic revisions and updates of the Hazard Mitigation Plan are required to ensure that the goals of the Plan are kept current, taking into account potential changes in hazard vulnerability and mitigation priorities. In addition, revisions may be necessary to ensure that the Plan is in full compliance with applicable federal and state regulations. Periodic evaluation of the Plan will also ensure that specific mitigation actions are being reviewed and carried out according to the Mitigation Action Plan. The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team shall meet once every year to evaluate the progress attained and to revise, where needed, the activities set forth in the Plan. This meeting shall be held in the month upon which final plan approval is attained, however, it may be necessary to schedule in the month prior or after in any given year, depending on the schedules of local officials. The findings and recommendations of the Planning Team will be documented in the form of a report that can be shared with interested cities, the county, and other stakeholders. The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team will also meet following any disaster events warranting a reexamination of the mitigation actions being implemented or proposed for future implementation. This will ensure that the Plan is continuously updated to reflect changing conditions and needs within Augusta-Richmond County. The Augusta- Richmond County Disaster Preparedness Coordinator will be responsible for reconvening the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team for these reviews. Five Year Plan Review The Plan will be thoroughly reviewed by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team every five years to determine whether there have been any significant changes in Augusta-Richmond County that may, in turn, necessitate changes in the types of mitigation actions proposed. New development in identified hazard areas, an increased exposure to hazards, an increase or decrease in capability to address hazards, and changes to federal or state legislation are examples of factors that may affect the necessary content of the Plan. The plan review provides Augusta-Richmond County/municipal officials with an opportunity to evaluate those actions that have been successful and to explore the possibility of documenting potential losses avoided due to the implementation of specific mitigation measures. The plan review also provides the opportunity to address mitigation actions that may not have been successfully implemented as assigned. The Augusta-Richmond County Disaster Preparedness Coordinator will be responsible for reconvening the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team and conducting the five-year review. SECTION 10: PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 10:4 During the five-year plan review process, the following questions will be considered as criteria for assessing the effectiveness and appropriateness of the Plan: Do the goals address current and expected conditions? Has the nature or magnitude of risks changed? Are the current resources appropriate for implementing the Plan? Are there implementation problems, such as technical, political, legal, or coordination issues with other agencies? Have the outcomes occurred as expected? Did city/county departments participate in the plan implementation process as assigned? Following the five-year review, any revisions deemed necessary will be summarized and implemented according to the reporting procedures and plan amendment process outlined herein. Upon completion of the review and update/amendment process, the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan will be submitted to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer at the Georgia Emergency Management Agency (GEMA) for final review and approval in coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Because the plan update process can take several months to complete, and because Federal funding may be needed to update the plan, it is recommended that the five-year review process begin at the beginning of the third year after the plan was last approved. This will allow the participants in the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan to organize in order to seek Federal funding if necessary and complete required plan update documentation before the plan expires at the end of the fifth year. Disaster Declaration Following a disaster declaration, the Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan will be revised as necessary to reflect lessons learned, or to address specific issues and circumstances arising from the event. It will be the responsibility of the Augusta-Richmond County Disaster Preparedness Coordinator to reconvene the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team and ensure the appropriate stakeholders are invited to participate in the plan revision and update process following declared disaster events. Reporting Procedures The results of the five-year review will be summarized by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team in a report that will include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Plan and any required or recommended changes or amendments. The report will also include an evaluation of implementation progress for each of the proposed mitigation actions, identifying reasons for delays or obstacles to their completion along with recommended strategies to overcome them. Plan Amendment Process Upon the initiation of the amendment process, representatives from Augusta-Richmond County and the participating municipalities will forward information on the proposed change(s) to all interested parties including, but not limited to, all directly affected departments, residents, and businesses. Information will also be forwarded to the Georgia Emergency Management Agency. This information will be SECTION 10: PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 10:5 disseminated in order to seek input on the proposed amendment(s) for no less than a 45-day review and comment period. At the end of the 45-day review and comment period, the proposed amendment(s) and all comments will be forwarded to the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team for final consideration. The Hazard Mitigation Planning Team will review the proposed amendment along with the comments received from other parties, and if acceptable, the committee will submit a recommendation for the approval and adoption of changes to the Plan. In determining whether to recommend approval or denial of a Plan amendment request, the following factors will be considered by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team: There are errors, inaccuracies, or omissions made in the identification of issues or needs in the Plan. New issues or needs have been identified which are not adequately addressed in the Plan. There has been a change in information, data, or assumptions from those on which the Plan is based. Upon receiving the recommendation from the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, and prior to adoption of the Plan, the participating jurisdictions will hold a public hearing. The governing bodies of each participating jurisdiction will review the recommendation from the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (including the factors listed above) and any oral or written comments received at the public hearing. Following that review, the governing bodies will take one of the following actions: Adopt the proposed amendments as presented; Adopt the proposed amendments with modifications; Refer the amendments request back to the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team for further revision; or Defer the amendment request back to the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team for further consideration and/or additional hearings. Incorporation into Existing Planning Documents The Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team intends to make available to all of Augusta-Richmond County and its municipalities a process by which the requirements of this hazard mitigation plan will be incorporated into other plans. During the planning process for new and updated local planning documents, such as a comprehensive plan, capital improvements plan, or emergency management plan to name a few examples, the Emergency Management Agency will provide a copy of the hazard mitigation plan to the advisory committee of each relevant planning document. The Emergency Management Agency will advise the advisory committee members to ensure that all goals and strategies of new and updated local planning documents are consistent with the hazard mitigation plan and will not increase hazards in the jurisdictions. This process will be carried out for each of the planning documents described in Section 7: Capability Assessment of this document. It should also be noted that the jurisdictions within the county are participants in the county-level version of each type of plan and do not have stand-alone jurisdictional plans of their own. Therefore, when the Emergency Management Agency shares and advises on the SECTION 10: PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan February 2017 10:6 hazard mitigation plan, they are acting on behalf of the municipalities. It should be further noted that due to the smaller size of the municipalities, municipal representatives of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team are often the same person who participates in the update of comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, and other planning documents. As such, much of the engrained knowledge these officials have gained from participating in the hazard mitigation planning process is transferred to these processes. Therefore, each municipality’s process for integrating the hazard mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms is the same as the county level process because these planning mechanisms are carried out as countywide plans or ordinances and each community’s stake in each process is intricately linked. 10.4 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 44 CFR Requirement 44 CFR Part 201.6(c)(4)(iii): The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. Public participation is an integral component to the mitigation planning process and will continue to be essential as this Plan evolves over time. As described above, significant changes or amendments to the Plan shall require a public hearing prior to any adoption procedures. Other efforts to involve the public in the maintenance, evaluation, and revision process will also be made. These efforts include: Advertising meetings of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team in local newspapers, public bulletin boards, and/or city/county and municipal office buildings; Designating willing and voluntary citizens and private sector representatives as official members of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team; Utilizing local media to update the public on any maintenance and/or periodic review activities taking place; Utilizing the websites of participating jurisdictions to advertise any maintenance and/or periodic review activities taking place; and Keeping copies of the Plan in public libraries. AAppppeennddiixx AA Plan Adoption This appendix includes the final approval letter and local adoption resolutions for each of the participating jurisdictions. AAppppeennddiixx BB Planning Tools This appendix includes the following: 1. List of Recommended Stakeholders 2. Blank Public Survey 3. GIS Data Inventory Sheet 4. Blank Capability Assessment Survey 5. Scoring Criteria for Capability Assessment 6. Blank Mitigation Action Worksheet 7. Plan Update Evaluation Worksheet In establishing a planning team, you want to ensure that you have a broad range of backgrounds and experiences represented. Below are some suggestions for agencies to include in a planning team. There are many organizations, both governmental and community-based, that should be included when creating a local team. In addition, state organizations can be included on local teams, when appropriate, to serve as a source of information and to provide guidance and coordination. Use the checklist as a starting point for forming your team. Check the boxes beside any individuals or organizations that you have in your community/state that you believe should be included on your planning team so you can follow up with them. Task A. Create the planning team – Suggestions for team members. Date:____________ Local/Tribal Administrator/Manager’s Office Budget/Finance Office Building Code Enforcement Office City/County Attorney’s Office Economic Development Office Emergency Preparedness Office Fire and Rescue Department Hospital Management Local Emergency Planning Committee Planning and Zoning Office Police/Sheriff’s Department Public Works Department Sanitation Department School Board Transportation Department Tribal Leaders Special Districts and Authorities Airport and Seaport Authorities Business Improvement District(s) Fire Control District Flood Control District Redevelopment Agencies Regional/Metropolitan Planning Organization(s) School District(s) Transit/Transportation Agencies Others Architectural/Engineering/Planning Firms Citizen Corps Colleges/Universities Land Developers Major Employers/Businesses Professional Associations Retired Professionals State Adjutant General’s Office (National Guard) Board of Education Building Code Office Climatologist Earthquake Program Manager Economic Development Office Emergency Management Office/State Hazard Mitigation Officer Environmental Protection Office Fire Marshal’s Office Geologist Homeland Security Coordinator’s Office Housing Office Hurricane Program Manager Insurance Commissioner’s Office National Flood Insurance Program Coordinator Natural Resources Office Planning Agencies Police Public Health Office Public Information Office Tourism Department Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) American Red Cross Chamber of Commerce Community/Faith-Based Organizations Environmental Organizations Homeowners Associations Neighborhood Organizations Private Development Agencies Utility Companies Other Appropriate NGOs Worksheet #1 Build the Planning Team step PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SURVEY FOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE We need your help! Please take a few minutes to complete this survey. The City of Augusta-Richmond County is working together to become less vulnerable to natural hazards, such as winter storms, tornadoes, and floods, as well as man-made hazards, including nuclear plant incidents and terrorism, and your participation is important to us! The City-County, along with local jurisdictions and other partners, are working to prepare a multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. This Plan will identify and assess our community’s natural and man-made hazard risks and determine how to best mitigate, or minimize and manage, those risks. This survey is an opportunity for you to share your opinions and participate in the mitigation planning process. The information you provide will help us better understand your hazard concerns and can lead to mitigation activities that should help lessen the impacts of future hazard events. Please help us by completing this survey by September 5, 2016 and returning it to: Margaret Walton, Atkins 1616 E Millbrook Road, Suite 310 Raleigh, NC 27609 Surveys can also be faxed to: (919) 876-6848 c/o Margaret Walton or scanned and emailed to: Margaret Walton at margaret.walton@atkinsglobal.com. If you have any questions regarding this survey or would like to learn about more ways you can participate in the development of the City of Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update, please contact Atkins, the planning consultant for the project. You may reach Margaret Walton (Atkins) at (803) 622-4142 or by email at margaret.walton@atkinsglobal.com. 1. Where do you live? Unincorporated Richmond County City of Augusta City of Blythe City of Hephzibah Other: __________ 2. Is your home located in a floodplain? Yes No I don’t know Page 2 of 5 3. Do you have flood insurance for your home/personal property? Yes No I don’t know a. If “No,” why not? Not located in floodplain Too expensive Not necessary because it never floods Not necessary because my property is elevated or otherwise protected Never really considered it Other (please explain): ___________________________________________ 4. Have you ever experienced or been impacted by a natural disaster or man-made incident? Yes No a. If “Yes,” please explain: 5. On a scale of 1 to 5, how concerned are you about the possibility of your community being impacted by a natural disaster or man-made incident? 1 – Not at all 2 – Slightly 3 – Moderately 4 – Very 5 – Extremely 6. Please select the three hazards you think pose the greatest concern to your community: Chemical Hazard Dam/Levee Failure Drought Earthquake Extreme Heat Flooding Hail Nuclear Plant Incident Severe Winter Storm Terrorism Tornado Windstorm Wildfire 7. Is there another hazard not listed above that you think is a wide-scale threat to your community? Yes (please explain): ___________________________________________________ No 8. On a scale of 1 to 5, how prepared do you feel if a natural disaster or man-made incident were to occur? 1 – Not at all 2 – Slightly 3 – Moderately 4 – Very 5 – Extremely 9. Have you taken any actions to make your home, neighborhood, or family safer from hazards? Yes No a. If “Yes,” please explain: 10. Are you interested in making your home, neighborhood, or family safer from hazards? Yes No 11. On a scale of 1 to 5, how informed do you feel about the risks and potential impacts of natural disasters and man-made incidents? 1 – Not at all 2 – Slightly 3 – Moderately 4 – Very 5 – Extremely Page 4 of 5 12. Do you know which government department or agency to contact regarding your risks from hazards in your area? Yes No 13. Please select the way(s) you prefer to receive information about how to make your home, neighborhood, or family safer from hazards: Newspaper Television Radio Internet Social media Email Mail Public workshops/meetings School meetings Other (please explain): __________________________________________________ 14. Please select the way(s) you prefer to receive alerts or warnings about impending hazard events or dangerous conditions: Television Radio Landline phone Cell phone Text message Facebook Twitter Other (please explain): __________________________________________________ 15. In your opinion, what are some steps your local government could take to reduce the risk of future hazard damages in your community? Page 5 of 5 16. A number of community-wide activities can reduce vulnerability to hazards. In general, these activities fall into one of the following six broad categories. Please tell us how important you think each category is for your community to consider. Category Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important 1. Prevention Administrative or regulatory actions that influence the way land is developed and buildings are built. Examples include planning and zoning, building codes, open space preservation, and floodplain regulations. 2. Property Protection Actions that involve modification of existing buildings to protect them from a hazard or removal from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, relocation, elevation, structural retrofits, and storm shutters. 3. Natural Resource Protection Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses, also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. Examples include floodplain protection, habitat preservation, slope stabilization, riparian buffers, and forest management. 4. Structural Projects Actions intended to lessen the impact of a hazard by modifying the natural progression of the hazard. Examples include dams, levees, detention/retention basins, channel modification, retaining walls, and storm sewers. 5. Emergency Services Actions that protect people and property during and immediately after a hazard event. Examples include warning systems, evacuation planning, emergency response training, and protection of critical emergency facilities or systems. 6. Public Education and Awareness Actions to inform citizens about hazards and the techniques they can use to protect themselves and their property. Examples include outreach projects, school education programs, library materials, and demonstration events. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION! GIS Data Request Sheet Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Data requested Available?Received?Potential Sources Tax Parcel Data Tax Assessor including replacement value Building Footprints Tax Assessor/GIS office Critical Facilities (in GIS or list form with addresses)Tax Assessor/GIS office examples include: government buildings hospitals senior care police/fire/EMS/EOC locally significant buildings schools Local hazard studies public works, natural resources, planning examples include: Flood Studies (HEC-RAS, Risk MAP) Local Hazard History Articles Areas of Concern Studies If you have any questions, please contact: Ryan Wiedenman ryan.wiedenman@gmail.com 919-431-5295 Local Capability Assessment Survey Jurisdiction/Agency:Phone: Point of Contact: E-mail: Strongly Supports Helps Facilitate Hazard Mitigation Plan Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Comprehensive Land Use Plan (or General, Master or Growth Management Plan) Floodplain Management Plan/Flood Mitigation Plan Open Space Management Plan (or Parks & Recreation/ Greenways Plan) Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance Natural Resource Protection Plan Flood Response Plan Emergency Operations Plan Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP Accreditation) Other Plans (please explain under Comments) 1. PLANNING AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether the following planning or regulatory tools (plans, ordinances, codes or programs) are currently in place or under development for your jurisdiction by placing an "X" in the appropriate box. Then, for each particular item in place, identify the department or agency responsible for its implementation and indicate its estimated or anticipated effect on hazard loss reduction (Strongly Supports or Helps Facilitate) with another "X". Finally, please provide additional comments or explanations in the space provided. CommentsPlanning/Regulatory Tool In Place Under Development Department/ Agency Responsible Effect on Loss Reduction Page 1 of 4 Local Capability Assessment Survey Strongly Supports Helps Facilitate Continuity of Operations Plan Evacuation Plan Disaster Recovery Plan Capital Improvements Plan Economic Development Plan Historic Preservation Plan Floodplain Ordinance (or Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance) Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance Unified Development Ordinance Post-disaster Redevelopment/ Reconstruction Plan/Ordinance Building Code Fire Code National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) Effect on Loss Reduction In Place Under Development CommentsDepartment/ Agency ResponsiblePlanning/Regulatory Tool Page 2 of 4 Local Capability Assessment Survey Staff/Personnel Resources Yes No Department/ Agency Planners with knowledge of land development and land management practices Engineers or professionals trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural and/or human-caused hazards Emergency manager Floodplain manager Land surveyors Scientists familiar with the hazards of the community Staff with education or expertise to assess the community’s vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and/or FEMA's HAZUS program Resource development staff or grant writers 2. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction maintains the following staff members within its current personnel resources by placing an "X" in the appropriate box. Then, if YES, please identify the department or agency they work under and provide any other comments you may have in the space provided. Comments Page 3 of 4 Local Capability Assessment Survey Financial Resources Yes - used to implement mitigation Yes - available No Capital Improvement Programming Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Special Purpose Taxes (or taxing districts) Gas/Electric Utility Fees Water/Sewer Fees Stormwater Utility Fees Development Impact Fees General Obligation, Revenue and/or Special Tax Bonds Partnering arrangements or intergovernmental agreements Other: _______________________ Political Support Limited Moderate High Degree of support by local elected officials in terms of adopting/funding mitigation Comments 3. FISCAL CAPABILITY - Please indicate whether your jurisdiction has previously used or has access to/is eligible to use the following local financial resources for hazard mitigation purposes (including as match funds for State of Federal mitigation grant funds) by placing an "X" in the appropriate box. Then, provide any other comments you may have in the space provided. Comments 4. POLITICAL CAPABILITY - Political capability can be generally measured by the degree to which local political leadership is willing to enact policies and programs that reduce hazard vulnerabilities in your community, even if met with some opposition. Examples may include guiding development away from identified hazard areas, restricting public investments or capital improvements within hazard areas, or enforcing local development standards that go beyond minimum State or Federal requirements (e.g., building codes, floodplain management, etc.). Please indicate if your community has limited, moderate, or high political capability by placing an "X" in the appropriate box. Then, identify some general examples of these efforts if available and/or reference where more documentation can be found. Page 4 of 4 Points System for Capability Ranking 0-24 points = Limited overall capability 25-49 points = Moderate overall capability 50-86 points = High overall capability I. Planning and Regulatory Capability (Up to 48 points) Yes = 3 points Under Development = 1 point Included under county plan/code/ordinance/program = 1 point No = 0 points Hazard Mitigation Plan Threat Hazard and Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Comprehensive Land Use Plan Floodplain Management Plan/Flood Mitigation Plan National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) NFIP Community Rating System (CRS Program) Yes = 2 points Under Development = 1 point Included under county plan/code/ordinance/program = 1 point No = 0 points Open Space Management Plan/Parks & Recreation Plan/Greenways Plan Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance Natural Resource Protection Plan Flood Response Plan Emergency Operations Plan Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP Accreditation) Continuity of Operations Plan Evacuation Plan Disaster Recovery Plan Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance Post-disaster Redevelopment/Reconstruction Plan/Ordinance Yes = 1 point No = 0 points Capital Improvements Plan Economic Development Plan Historic Preservation Plan Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance Unified Development Ordinance Building Code Fire Code II. Administrative and Technical Capability (Up to 15 points) Yes = 2 points Service provided by county = 1 point No = 0 points Planners with knowledge of land development and land management practices Engineers or professionals trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural and/or human-caused hazards Emergency manager Floodplain manager Yes = 1 point No = 0 points Land surveyors Scientist familiar with the hazards of the community Staff with education or expertise to assess the community’s vulnerability to hazards Personnel skilled in Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and/or Hazus Resource development staff or grant writers III. Fiscal Capability (Up to 20 points) Yes - used to implement mitigation = 2 points Yes - available = 1 point No = 0 points Capital Improvement Programming Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Special Purpose Taxes (or tax districts) Gas/Electric Utility Fees Water/Sewer Fees Stormwater Utility Fees Development Impact Fees General Obligation/Revenue/Special Tax Bonds Partnering arrangements or intergovernmental agreements Other IV. Political Capability (Up to 3 points) High = 3 point Moderate = 2 points Limited = 1 point Degree of support by local elected officials in terms of adopting/funding mitigation MITIGATION ACTION WORKSHEETS Mitigation Action Worksheets are used to identify potential hazard mitigation actions that participating jurisdictions in Augusta-Richmond County will consider to reduce the negative effects of identified hazards. The worksheets provide a simple yet effective method of organizing potential actions in a user- friendly manner that can easily be incorporated into the Augusta-Richmond County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. The worksheets are to be used as part of a strategic planning process and are designed to be: a.) completed electronically (worksheets and instructions will be e-mailed to members of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team following the Mitigation Strategy Workshop); b.) reviewed with your department/organization for further consideration; and c.) returned according to the contact information provided below. Please return all completed worksheets by December 2, 2016 to: Margaret M. Walton, Project Manager, Atkins Electronic copies may be e-mailed to: margaret.walton@atkinsglobal.com Hard copies may be faxed to: 919.876.6848 (Attn: Ryan Wiedenman) INSTRUCTIONS Each mitigation action should be considered to be a separate local project, policy or program and each individual action should be entered into a separate worksheet. By identifying the implementation requirements for each action, the worksheets will help lay the framework for engaging in distinct actions that will help reduce the community’s overall vulnerability and risk. Detailed explanations on how to complete the worksheet are provided below. Proposed Action: Identify a specific action that, if accomplished, will reduce vulnerability and risk in the impact area. Actions may be in the form of local policies (i.e., regulatory or incentive-based measures), programs or structural mitigation projects and should be consistent with any pre-identified mitigation goals and objectives. Site and Location: Provide details with regard to the physical location or geographic extent of the proposed action, such as the location of a specific structure to be mitigated, whether a program will be citywide, countywide or regional, etc. History of Damages: Provide a brief history of any known damages as it relates to the proposed action and the hazard(s) being addressed. For example, the proposed elevation of a repetitive loss property should include an overview of the number of times the structure has flooded, total dollar amount of damages if available, etc. Hazard(s) Addressed: List the hazard(s) the proposed action is designed to mitigate against. Category: Indicate the most appropriate category for the proposed action as discussed during the Mitigation Strategy Workshop (Prevention; Property Protection; Natural Resource Protection; Structural Projects; Emergency Services; Public Education and Awareness). Priority: Indicate whether the action is a “high” priority, “moderate” priority or “low” priority based generally on the following criteria: 1. Effect on overall risk to life and property 2. Ease of implementation / technical feasibility 3. Project costs versus benefits 4. Political and community support 5. Funding availability Estimated Cost: If applicable, indicate what the total cost will be to accomplish this action. This amount will be an estimate until actual final dollar amounts can be determined. Some actions (such as ordinance revisions) may only cost “local staff time” and should be noted so. Potential Funding Sources: If applicable, indicate how the cost to complete the action will be funded. For example, funds may be provided from existing operating budgets or general funds, a previously established contingency fund, a cost-sharing federal or state grant program, etc. Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Identify the local agency, department or organization that is best suited to implement the proposed action. Implementation Schedule: Indicate when the action will begin and when the action is expected to be completed. Remember that some actions will require only a minimal amount of time, while others may require a long-term or continuous effort. Comments: This space is provided for any additional information or details that may not be captured under the previous headings. MITIGATION ACTION Proposed Action: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site and Location: History of Damages: MITIGATION ACTION DETAILS Hazard(s) Addressed: Category: Priority (High, Moderate, Low): Estimated Cost: Potential Funding Sources: Lead Agency/Department Responsible: Implementation Schedule: COMMENTS A-35 Task 3 Create an Outreach Strategy Mitigation Action Progress Report Form Progress Report Period From Date: To Date: Action/Project Title Responsible Agency Contact Name Contact Phone/Email Project Status o Project completed o Project canceled o Project on schedule o Anticipated completion date:_______________________________________________________ o Project delayed Explain _________________________________________________________________________ Summary of Project Progress for this Report Period 1. What was accomplished for this project during this reporting period? _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. What obstacles, problems, or delays did the project encounter? _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. If uncompleted, is the project still relevant? Should the project be changed or revised? _______________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. Other comments _______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ Worksheet 7.1 Mitigation Action Progress Report Form A-37 Task 3 Create an Outreach Strategy Plan Update Evaluation Worksheet Plan Section Considerations Explanation Planning Process Should new jurisdictions and/or districts be invited to participate in future plan updates? Have any internal or external agencies been invaluable to the mitigation strategy? Can any procedures (e.g., meeting announcements, plan updates) be done differently or more efficiently? Has the Planning Team undertaken any public outreach activities? How can public participation be improved? Have there been any changes in public support and/or decision- maker priorities related to hazard mitigation? Capability Assessment Have jurisdictions adopted new policies, plans, regulations, or reports that could be incorporated into this plan? Are there different or additional administrative, human, technical, and financial resources available for mitigation planning? Are there different or new education and outreach programs and resources available for mitigation activities? Has NFIP participation changed in the participating jurisdictions? Risk Assessment Has a natural and/or technical or human-caused disaster occurred? Should the list of hazards addressed in the plan be modified? Are there new data sources and/or additional maps and studies available? If so, what are they and what have they revealed? Should the information be incorporated into future plan updates? Do any new critical facilities or infrastructure need to be added to the asset lists? Have any changes in development trends occurred that could create additional risks? Are there repetitive losses and/or severe repetitive losses to document? Worksheet 7.2 Plan Update Evaluation Worksheet A-38 Local Mitigation Planning Handbook Task 3 Create an Outreach Strategy Plan Section Considerations Explanation Mitigation Strategy Is the mitigation strategy being implemented as anticipated? Were the cost and timeline estimates accurate? Should new mitigation actions be added to the Action Plan? Should existing mitigation actions be revised or eliminated from the plan? Are there new obstacles that were not anticipated in the plan that will need to be considered in the next plan update? Are there new funding sources to consider? Have elements of the plan been incorporated into other planning mechanisms? Plan Maintenance Procedures Was the plan monitored and evaluated as anticipated? What are needed improvements to the procedures? Worksheet 7.2 Plan Update Evaluation Worksheet AAppppeennddiixx CC Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool AAppppeennddiixx DD Planning Process Documentation This appendix includes: 1. Meeting Agendas 2. Meeting Minutes 3. Meeting Sign-In Sheets 4. Meeting Notices 5. Public Survey Advertisements 6. Public Survey Results AGENDA City of Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update August 5, 2016 12:30pm 1) Introductions 2) Overview of Mitigation Planning 3) Project Overview i) Planning Process ii) Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee iii) Project Schedule iv) Data Request 4) Roles and Responsibilities 5) Next Steps 6) Questions/Concerns AGENDA City of Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategy Meeting November 4, 2016 1) Introductions 2) Mitigation Refresher 3) Project Schedule 4) Risk Assessment Findings a) Hazard History and Profiles b) Conclusions on Risk: PRI 5) Capability Assessment Findings i) Indicators ii) Results 6) Public Involvement Activities 7) Mitigation Strategy i) Current Goals/Actions ii) New Actions iii) Discussion 8) Next Steps i) Mitigation Actions 9) Questions, Issues, or Concerns Meeting Minutes City of Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kick-off Meeting August 5, 2016 Chief Christopher James, Fire Chief for the City of Augusta-Richmond County, opened the meeting by introducing himself and the consultant, Atkins. He outlined the process for developing and updating a hazard mitigation plan. He stated that the County could potentially receive funding for having a completed hazard mitigation plan. Margaret Walton, Project Manager from the project consultant Atkins, led the meeting and began by providing an overview of the agenda items and briefly reviewed each of the handouts that were distributed in the meeting packets (agenda and presentation slides). She then asked each of the meeting attendees to introduce themselves. Following introductions, she provided a brief overview of the meeting agenda and the stages of the mitigation planning process that would be addressed through this plan. Ms. Walton emphasized that mitigation refers to actions (projects, policies, plans) to reduce the impacts of future hazard events. The hazard mitigation planning process looks at hazards, capability to conduct mitigation, and specific activities to reduce impacts of hazards. She explained how Federal legislation requires local governments to have a hazard mitigation plan in place to remain eligible for federal mitigation grants such as the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, and Flood Mitigation Assistance Program so there is funding to implement some of the actions that this plan may identify. Ms. Walton then laid out all of the mitigation techniques/categories that mitigation actions fall into. She walked through the PowerPoint presentation to outline various examples of each technique and began a discussion of projects that the County and participating jurisdictions might pursue. Following this discussion, Ms. Walton led an icebreaker exercise. She provided instructions to attendees on how to complete the exercise. Attendees were given an equal amount of fictitious FEMA money ($20 each) and asked to spend it in the various mitigation categories. Money could be thought of as grant money that communities received towards mitigation or areas that they feel are more of a priority. Given the windfall of financial resources, attendees target their money towards areas of mitigation that are of greatest concern. Ideally, the exercise helps pinpoint areas of mitigation that the community may want to focus on when developing mitigation grants. Ms. Walton explained that the results would be presented at the next Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee meeting. The results were: Emergency Services - $139 Prevention - $124 Public Education and Awareness - $115 Property Protection - $83 Structural Projects - $65 Natural Resource Protection - $39 Ms. Walton shared the objectives of the plan to include updating the document for Augusta-Richmond County, maintaining funding eligibility for the City/County and its two municipalities, initiate the Community Rating System (CRS) for the jurisdictions, potential projects identification, public education and awareness, and State and Federal compliance. Then she spent some time explaining the CRS program and the benefits of it for a community as well as the ways to capitalize on points to gain a better class for the community thereby reducing flood insurance premiums for citizens. Ms. Walton outlined the municipalities’ roles in the processes and what would be needed to assist in developing the plan. The cycle of the project tasks were also shared and each phase was described to include the planning process and risk assessment. Ms. Walton explained that in the risk assessment portion of the plan development that FEMA requires that plans address natural hazards, but an all-hazards approach is becoming more prevalent. She shared the previous hazards that were identified in the plan and asked the group to possibly decide if there were additional hazards they would like to add to the list. Additional hazards that were suggested were cyberterrorism, utility failure, infectious disease, climate adaptation, and solar EMP. Some manmade/technological hazards were included in the previous hazard identification, but the vulnerability assessment focuses more on the natural hazards since more mitigation funding is available for natural hazards. Capability Assessment Ms. Walton explained the community capability assessment and discussed how capability is divided primarily into 3 categories: Administrative Technical Fiscal Mitigation Strategy Ms. Walton discussed mitigation strategy and how it is developed. She stated that mitigation goals come from the existing plan and maybe adjusted and objectives may be added if the City/County desires to do that. The current mitigation actions will be updated as well with their status. However, all of the jurisdictions will need to develop new actions as well based on the risk assessment. She continued the presentation by discussing the necessary documentation for the planning process, the rapid project schedule, and the project team. Public Involvement Ms. Walton explained how public comment and participation is a required part of this process. A public survey was developed that the City/County will be placing on their website. The link will be shared electronically following the meeting and local academic institutions were asked to disseminate the survey as well. Next, Ms. Walton discussed the roles and responsibilities of all the parties involved as well as the expectations on the level of involvement. The Atkins team will provide technical assistance, data collection, facilitation, and plan preparation. The City/County and jurisdictions were asked to be active participants by assisting with data collection, public awareness, hosting committee meetings, mitigation strategy, plan feedback, and plan adoption. The next steps are to initiate data collection with the risk assessment and capability assessment. The floor was opened for questions and comments. Ms. Walton then adjourned the meeting Meeting Minutes City of Augusta-Richmond County Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategy Meeting – Augusta, SC November 4, 2016 Chief Christopher James introduced himself and the project team from Atkins. He explained that this is a large part of our planning effort and appreciated everyone coming. Chief James then turned the meeting over to Ms. Walton, the project manager for Atkins. She asked who in the audience did not attend the previous meeting and asked them to introduce themselves. Individuals were from Emergency Management, Trinity Hospital, Electrolux, Augusta University, Augusta Utilities, Animal Services, Fire, City of Hephzibah, and Public Health. She mentioned that the meeting and presentation were informal and could be interrupted for any questions. Ms. Walton emphasized the importance of the potential funding for the participating jurisdictions and entities. Ryan Wiedenman led the next portion of the meeting regarding the risk assessment. He explained that the planning team worked together to build a list of potential hazards. Mr. Wiedenman with Atkins then presented the findings of the risk assessment. He stated that the risk assessment is the base of the mitigation plan and that we now have better data to update the hazard history. Mr. Wiedenman identified the three pieces of the risk assessment and the caveats for the risk assessment. He reviewed the Presidential Disaster Declarations that have impacted the region. He then explained the process for preparing Hazard Profiles and discussed how each hazard falls into one of four basic categories: Atmospheric, Hydrologic, Geologic, and Other. He indicated that each hazard must be evaluated and formally ruled out if it is not applicable to the study area, even where it seems obvious (such as in the case of landslide). Mr. Wiedenman reviewed the Hazard Profiles and the following bullets summarize the information presented: CLIMATE CHANGE. It has been measured to some degree but not near as significantly as future occurrences. Future occurrences are likely. DROUGHT. There have been 0 events recorded since 1996 according to NCDC. Future occurrences are highly likely. The previous plan notes 3 severe droughts in 1986, 1998, and 2003. EARTHQUAKES. There have been 24 recorded earthquake events since 1812. There were 21 in Augusta and 3 in Hephzibah. The strongest had a recorded magnitude of VIII (MMI). Future occurrences are possible. EXTREME HEAT. There have been 0 recorded events since 1996 at the county level. Future occurrences are highly likely. FLOOD. There have been 24 flood events since 1996, 23 of them in Augusta and 1 at Ft. Gordon. Future occurrences are highly likely. HAIL. There have been 72 recorded events since 1955 at the county level; 55 in Augusta, 11 in Hephzibah, and 6 at Ft. Gordon. $30,716 in property damages were reported. Future occurrences are highly likely. HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS. There have been 74 storm tracks that have come within 75 miles of the region since 1850. Future occurrences are likely. INFECTIOUS DISEASE OUTBREAK. Highly contagious types of infectious diseases have potential to cause major problems in concentrated areas. Future occurrences are possible. LIGHTNING. There has been 1 recorded lightning event in the region since 2012 resulting in $167,703 in reported property damages. 0 deaths and 3 injuries were reported. Future occurrences are highly likely. WINTER STORM AND FREEZE. There have been 8 recorded events since 2002. No deaths and 1 injury was reported. Future occurrences are likely. SOLAR EMP. There have been no major events recorded. Future occurrences are likely. TORNADOES. There have been 10 recorded tornado events reported since 1954. No deaths and 1 injury was reported. Future occurrences are likely. THUNDERSTORM / HIGH WINDS. There have been 182 thunderstorm events reported since 1955, 156 in Augusta, 12 in Hephzibah, and 9 at Ft. Gordon. 1 death and 36 injuries were reported. The County 4 million dollars reported in property damages. Future occurrences are highly likely. WILDFIRE. The average is 38 fires annually. The annual average is 129 acres annually. Future occurrences are likely. CHEMICAL HAZARD. 339 reported events since 1971. 21 were reported as serious incidents as well as 27 injuries. Future occurrences are highly likely. $771,913 has been reported in property damage. CYBER TERRORISM. No previous cyber-attacks have occurred. Future occurrences are possible. DAM AND LEVEE FAILURE. No recorded events in the County. Future occurrences are unlikely. NUCLEAR PLANT INCIDENT. No major incidents have been reported. Future occurrences are unlikely. TERRORISM. No major events have occurred in the County. Future events are possible. UTILITY FAILURE (Power/Water). No events have been recorded. Ice storms or strong wind events are typically the cause. Future occurrences are possible. During the hazard profile portion, specifics on each hazard were discussed. The initial hazard of discussion was climate change and it was suggested that it is a mix of drought and flooding. There was also some discussion on the number of repetitive loss properties. The group also requested that hail, tornado, and thunderstorm be examined separately. The Director of Public Health also shared that he had more updated infectious disease statistics that can be included. The committee suggested that more winter storm was available as well. Mr. Wiedenman stated that he tries to look at all of the hazards objectively. The results of the hazard identification process were used to generate a Priority Risk Index (PRI), which categorizes and prioritizes potential hazards as high, moderate or low risk based on probability, impact, spatial extent, warning time, and duration. The highest PRI was assigned to Flood, Climate Change, Chemical Hazard, Drought, Extreme Heat, and Hurricane/Tropical Storm. It was decided that Hurricane/Tropical Storm and Severe Winter Storm should both be moved to moderate based on justification from the group. The discussion continued with the area experiences more windstorms to straight line winds over hurricane and this provide the rationale to lower the severity of Hurricane/Tropical Storm. Another topic of discussion was the idea of separating chemical hazards into fixed site incidents and transportation incidents and placing both of them in the high range. It was also suggested that climate change could be viewed as the effect from other hazards instead of a separate risk. Ms. Walton then began the overview of the capability assessment. She stated the mechanism for how the capabilities are measured to include planning and regulatory capability, administrative and technical capability, fiscal capability, and political capability. Capability indicators included: • National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Participation • Community Rating System (CRS) Participation • Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) • Local Capability Assessment Survey – Inventory and evaluation of existing plans, policies, programs and ordinances – Measures administrative, technical, fiscal and political capability Ms. Walton stated that the current capabilities overall vary based on the size of the jurisdiction but that initiating the CRS program would provide a significant benefit to the community. Next, Ms. Walton gave an overview of the public participation survey. She highlighted how the survey was disseminated and that 409 completed surveys were received. The highlights included that 90% of respondents are interested in making the community more resistant to hazards; 43% have already taken action to make their residences/homes/neighborhoods more hazard resistant; and 47% do not know who to contact regarding risk reduction. The variety of responses for each question were shared. The overarching summary shared that the highest importance was placed on emergency services, prevention, and public education and awareness. The next portion of the meeting was focused on the mitigation strategy. Ms. Walton explained that the mitigation strategy stems from the findings of the risk assessment and public survey along with the capability assessment that will be completed and that the main purpose is to develop an action plan which is the most important part of the plan. Additional handouts of the mitigation action worksheet and potential mitigation goals were distributed. It was shared that the general idea of protecting life, health, and the safety of all citizens should be the focus. Information on exactly how to update the existing was detailed and examples were given. The steps to developing new mitigation actions were outlined as well and examples were given that might pertain to Augusta-Richmond County. Ms. Walton also reminded the group about the repetitive loss properties in the area as a reminder that actions for mitigating flooding should be included. She also connected back to the capability assessment to encourage actions related to areas of weakness for the City-County. Lastly, Ms. Walton stated that she would send the mitigation strategy documents out electronically and that she needed all feedback by December 2. Finally, the next steps of completing the mitigation strategy, drafting the plan, and submitting it were shared. She stated that she would be available to assist with mitigation action development and then asked if there were any questions. She then thanked the Committee for taking the time to attend and the meeting was adjourned. MEDIA ADVISORY Public Meeting Scheduled for City of Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update August 1, 2016 CONTACT: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Mie Lucas, Disaster Preparedness Coordinator Augusta Fire/Emergency Management Division 706.821.1157 office 706.799.9803 cell 706.821.1246 fax dlucas@augustaga.gov (Augusta, GA) – Augusta-Richmond County Emergency Management is in the process of updating our Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan and we need your help! The Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies the hazards and risks within the City-County and determines exactly what the City-County can do to mitigate some of the potential damages in the future due to a disaster event whether it be winter weather or a storm. This plan serves as a guide for floodplain management and can help prevent losses in that area as well. This is a City-County-wide plan, so it is very important that everyone that has a vested interest comes together to provide input and weigh in on the prevention and mitigation. Every 5 years the plan has to be updated in order to maintain our eligibility for disaster assistance funds following any type of Federal Disaster Declaration. Our kick-off meeting regarding this initiative will take place at the Augusta Municipal Building in the Commission Chambers located at 535 Telfair Street, Augusta, GA on Friday, August 5 starting at 12:00pm. If you have any questions, please reach out to Augusta Fire/Emergency Management Division at at 706.821.1155. Augusta Fire/Emergency Management Division City of Augusta-Richmond County 3117 Deans Bridge Road Augusta, GA 30906 Ph: 706.821.1155/ Fx: 706.821.1246 Chief Christopher James Augusta Fire/Emergency Management Division LEPC Distribution From: Sharon W. Bennett Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:48 PM To: Alan Hampton Member <ahampton@genchemcorp.com>; Bill Foster Member <bill@impactsafetysystems.com>; Bill Welsh- Univ <BillWelsh@uh.org>; Charlie Bowles <CharlieB@prayoninc.com>; Chuck Ray (Chuck.Ray@GEMA.GA.GOV) <Chuck.Ray@GEMA.GA.GOV>; Coord. LEPC (russell.bergmann@gema.ga.gov) <russell.bergmann@gema.ga.gov>; David Brown <David.Brown1@Va.gov>; Debra Beazley <dbeazley@augustaga.gov>; Earl Hilson Member <jehilson@olin.com>; Jack Milton, Jr <JMiltonJr@augustaga.gov>; James Reed <reed.jd.2@pg.com>; Jennifer Sosebee- Trinity <jsosebee@hhs1.com>; Jerry Asbach <jasbach@augustatech.edu>; Jimmy Atkins-school board <atkinji@boe.richmond.k12.ga.us>; Joe Webber -CEPAR (jwebber2@augusta.edu) <jwebber2@augusta.edu>; John Horne-PCS <John.Horne@potashcorp.com>; John Ryan - Member (john.f.ryan56.civ@mail.mil) <john.f.ryan56.civ@mail.mil>; Jonathan Adriano Public Health <jdadriano@dhr.state.ga.us>; Joseph Foster <joseph@impactsafetysystems.com>; Joseph Gnann- Georgia Pacfic Co. <jgnann@spglp.com>; Juanita McDaniel <jmcdaniel@uwcsra.org>; Ken U. Erondu <Kerondu@gru.edu>; Kimberly Ledbetter- Ft. Gordon <kimberly.h.ledbetter4.ctr@mail.mil>; Lawrence Beggs Nutrasweet <lawrence.j.beggs@nutrasweet.com>; Commissioner William Lockett <WLockett@augustaga.gov>; Michael Williams DSM <michael.williams@dsm.com>; Michael Willis- Gold Cross <mwillis@goldcrossems.com>; Mie Lucas <DLucas@augustaga.gov>; Mille Graham- Augusta Trans Flo <augustatransflo@kindermorgan.com>; Nicholas Walsh- Olin (NPWalsh@olin.com) <NPWalsh@olin.com>; Nick Almeter (Nick.almeter@solvay.com) <Nick.almeter@solvay.com>; Paul Duckworth <Paul.Duckworth@potashcorp.com>; Randy Barrs Member <rbarrs9@yahoo.com>; Richard Dorman <richard.dorman@morganplc.com>; Scott Gay <sgay@augustaga.gov>; Stuart Stapleton-EQ <stuart.stapleton@eqonline.com>; Tameka Allen <Allen@augustaga.gov>; Terri Turner <tturner@augustaga.gov>; Terrie Bradford <terrie.bradford@hcahealthcare.com>; Troy Temples- Olin <tdtemples@olin.com>; Vince Brogdon <vbrogdon@goldcrossems.com>; Audrey <aef_audrey@yahoo.com>; Chad Parrish - Industrial Chem <Chadparish@industrialchem.com>; Cheri Mcleod- Akzonobel <cheri.mcleod@akzonobel.com>; Chris Pogson- Chem Trade Logistics <cpogson@chemtradelogistics.com>; Dan Gates-Region 6 ESM <dan.gates@dph.ga.gov>; Dan Martin AD Enviro <dmartin@adenviro.com>; Denise Cooper <ecooper1@auguta.edu>; Denise Cooper - Jasper <ecooper1@gru.edu>; Jamey Crosby <JCrosby@GoldCrossEMS.com>; Jasper Cooke <jcooke@augusta.edu>; Joe Webber -CEPAR <JWEBBER2@gru.edu>; John Neel AD Enviro <jneel@adenviro.com>; Kevin Wells- Jasper <kwells@gru.edu>; Laycee Silas <LSilas@augustaga.gov>; Michele Horton- Georgia Pacific <michele.horton@gapac.com>; Miller Birdsong- Doctors Hospital (Milton.birdsong@hcahealthcare.com) <Milton.birdsong@hcahealthcare.com>; Richard Watson <richardwatson@industrialchem.com>; Smith, Charles III CIV USARMY MEDCOM EAMC (US) <charles.smith45.civ@mail.mil>; Tim Weegar <tweegar@augustaga.gov>; Tom Basile Univar USA <Tom.basile@univarusa.com>; Wilford Storey <Wilford.Storey@morganplc.com> Subject: Information From Sharon Hello Everyone! This is a survey link we need everyone to take this survey for us. The survey will help us with the Hazard Mitigation Plan update! Even if you just work and not live in Richmond County we need you to take the survey. Thanks and hope to see you all next Friday. See the links below…any questions please let me know. Have a great afternoon. Sharon This is the link: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/2950698/Augusta- Richmond-County-Public-Participation-Survey It is now on our EMA page under the news center here: http://www.augustaga.gov/462/Emergency-Management Sharon W. Bennett, GA-PCEM, MM Emergency Management Specialist Community Emergency Response Team Program Manager Augusta Fire Department/Emergency Management Division 3117 Deans Bridge Road Augusta, Georgia 30906 706-821-1156 Office 706-821-2914 Fax VOLUNTARY SERVICE—the one human endeavor in which men and women of all races, nationalities, backgrounds and languages unite as a single force in pursuit of a single goal: Helping others help themselves. Please consider the environment before printing this email. This e-mail contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. The City of Augusta accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the City of Augusta. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message which arise as a result of the e-mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy version. AED:104.1 City of Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Participation Survey Results Public Participation Survey •Provides an opportunity for the public to share opinions and participate in the planning process •Link to survey posted on city-county website •409 completed surveys received Public Participation Survey Highlights •90% of respondents are interested in making their homes safer from hazards •43% have already taken action to make their homes safer from hazards •47% do not who to contact regarding risks from hazards 1. Where do you live? 42 186 4 35 139 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 # of Responses Unincorporated Richmond Co. City of Augusta City of Blythe City of Hephzibah Other 5.9% 67.1% 27.0% Yes No I don't know 2. Is your home in a floodplain? 12.2% 73.6% 14.2% Yes No I don't know 3. Do you have flood insurance? 51.0% 6.7%2.2% 15.4% 15.4% 9.3%Not located in floodplain Too expensive Not necessary: it never floods Not necessary: elevated or otherwise protected Never really considered it Other 3a. Why no flood insurance? 48.7% 51.3% Yes No 4. Have you experienced a disaster? 0.8%0.4%3.8%0.4%2.5% 8.8%0.8% 10.5% 0.4% 7.1% 13.8% 47.3% 3.3% Chemical Hazard Drought Earthquake Extreme Temperatures Fire Flood Hailstorm Hurricane / Tropical Storm Land Subsidence/Sink Hole Severe Storm / High Wind Tornado Winter / Ice Storm Other 4a. Examples of disasters experienced 4.5% 18.8% 42.7% 22.5% 11.5% 1 - Not at all 2 - Slightly 3 - Moderately 4 - Very 5 - Extremely 5. How concerned about possibility of being impacted by disaster? 6. Hazards of greatest concern? 193 155 136 124 124 0 50 100 150 200 250 # of Responses Severe Winter Storm Nuclear Plant Incident Tornado Chemical Hazard Extreme Heat 7. Other hazards not listed? •Hurricane •Bug infestation •Water quality (petrol/oil contamination) •Biomedical hazards •Biological incident •Civil unrest/riots •Economic collapse •Transportation/rail incident •Infectious disease/pandemic •Infrastructure problems/disruption •Microburst •Hurricane evacuees seeking refuge •Trees falling 11.6% 26.1% 45.3% 15.4% 1.6% 1 - Not at all 2 - Slightly 3 - Moderately 4 - Very 5 - Extremely 8. How prepared if disaster occurs? 42.9% 57.1% Yes No 9. Taken action to be safer from hazards? 8.8%0.6% 9.4% 79.2% 1.3%0.6% Debris / Tree Removal Drainage House Retrofit / Repair / Protection Preparedness / Emergency Planning Storm Shelter / Safe Room Other 9a. Examples of actions taken 89.5% 10.5% Yes No 10. Interested in being safer from hazards? 8.0% 18.4% 41.8% 25.5% 6.3% 1 - Not at all 2 - Slightly 3 - Moderately 4 - Very 5 - Extremely 11. How informed about risks and impacts of disasters? 52.9% 47.1%Yes No 12. Know who to contact regarding risks from hazards? 7.6% 16.1% 11.9% 16.6%10.7% 16.6% 8.2% 8.5% 1.8%1.9%Newspaper Television Radio Internet Social media Email Mail Public workshops / meetings School meetings 13. Preferred way to receive info. about being safer from hazards? 13. Other ways to receive information •Text message •Neighborhood association/meetings •Phone •Word of mouth •Federal sources (NOAA, FEMA, USACE) •Work 21.6% 18.3% 5.7%20.3% 22.0% 8.5% 2.1%1.4% Television Radio Landline phone Cell phone Text message Facebook Twitter Other 14. Preferred way to receive alerts/ warnings about hazard events? 14. Other ways to receive alerts/warnings •Email •Siren/alarms •Alerts (like amber alert) •Smartphone app •Neighborhood association •Internet 5.7% 7.0% 1.9% 1.0% 3.5% 4.5% 3.5% 4.8% 12.1% 15.0%2.5% 2.9% 2.5% 2.2% 30.6% 0.3%Alert / Warning System Improve Communication / Coordination Emergency / Storm Shelters Evacuation Debris / Tree Removal Improve / Maintain Drainage / Flood Protection Improve / Maintain / Retrofit Infrastructure Response / Recovery Training / Drills / Exercises Preparedness / Emergency Planning Prevention / Regulation Monitoring / Enforcement / Inspections Hazard Risk / Vulnerability Assessment Grants / Budget / Funding Public Education / Awareness Vulnerable Populations 15. Steps local gov’t could take to reduce risk 84.5% 14.9% 1.1% Very important Somewhat important Not important 16. Mitigation Actions: Prevention 62.1% 36.2% 2.6% Very important Somewhat important Not important 16. Mitigation Actions: Property Protection 71.8% 25.9% 2.6% Very important Somewhat important Not important 16. Mitigation Actions: Natural Resource Protection 74.6% 24.6% 0.9% Very important Somewhat important Not important 16. Mitigation Actions: Structural Projects 94.3% 5.1% 0.9% Very important Somewhat important Not important 16. Mitigation Actions: Emergency Services 82.3% 17.1% 0.9% Very important Somewhat important Not important 16. Mitigation Actions: Public Education & Awareness •Highest importance –Emergency Services –Prevention –Public Education & Awareness •Moderate importance –Structural Projects –Natural Resource Protection •Lowest importance –Property Protection 16. Mitigation Actions: Summary City of Augusta-Richmond County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Participation Survey Results © Atkins Ltd except where stated otherwise. The Atkins logo, ‘Carbon Critical Design’ and the strapline ‘Plan Design Enable’ are trademarks of Atkins Ltd. Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Probation Services Department Department: Department: Caption:Motion to provide a 60-day notice to the Magistrate judges that the City of Augusta plans to change the in-house probation order and request a meeting with the judges within ten days of the approval by the Commission.(Approved by Public Safety Committee February 28, 2017) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 2017 Summer Intern Program grant Department:Public Defender Department:Public Defender Caption:Motion to accept the 2017 Summer Intern Program $4000 Grant from Civic Affairs Foundation. (Approved by Finance Committee February 28, 2017) Background:This grant for a summer intern program is offered through the Civic Affairs Foundation Analysis:The grants are 100% with no match required. : This grant is awarded for the 2017 summer program in the amount of $4000 for the Public Defender intern project to cover two internships. The grant funds costs associated with the intern’s salary and benefits as specified in the grant contact. We will recruit second-year law interns through the Career Development Office of the University of Georgia School of Law to be posted from March 1, 2017- March 15, 2017. Two interns will be selected and notified by March 31, 2017. The interns shall work a maximum of 15 hours a week for a total of 180 hours between May 1, 2017 and August 31, 2017. Financial Impact:No cost to Augusta Alternatives:None recommended Recommendation:To approve Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: N/A REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:Cover Memo Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AUGUSTA, GEORGIA New Grant Proposal/Application 3:11T,:.',::ilif"'IjT;li.l##:::'l*,'::"'":ry"T"1T:l::',1f,:llugusta Richmond counrv, thcv must nrst obrain approvar;ffi;i,;:;*Tffiffi,fllreouiremonlcfrnm fhpfirndi-., aart -^.,!^.,,4r-^^^.^-.^,-!L!r.,;TH:T:,::::,I,*f"t$-.::r^""fl:::11:Lf"_i..y lq: for feasibirityto dcterminr if rhi, s;;;1i;"".i'",i,0.,?* ^il;:;:i:1I"":"'"::TI;],li *:ance Dircctor wirr review rhc runding ..qri."-.rt i;;;;ilffi'irii,. e.,,, "ii,;ilffi, ffiIuag.tstructurc and financial goels. Proposal Project No. Project Title REGEIVED AOMINISTRATOR'S OFFICEPROOOO8I PD 2017 Sumrner Intern Suruner Intern grant from ACCG. EEO Required: No EEO Dept Notified: No Start Date: 05/01/2017 Submit Date: 02113/ZOl7 Total Budgeted Amount: 4,000.00 Sponsor: GM0022 Sponsor Type: py1 Purpose: l3 Type ID Name End Datc: 09/01/20t7 Department: 029 Total Funding Agency: ACCG Civic Affairs Foundation Private Entity Comm_unlt1 Contacis FFB t 1 tufl AUGUSTA.RICHMOND COUNTY Public Defender Cash Match? N 4,000.00 Totel Cash Match: 0.00 Flow Thru ID: I CUIOgO Mason, Katherine (706)842-1347 Type FA -ELK. MASON Approvals Dateffitzon Dept. 1 .) I Py+ reviewed the Grant application and enclosed ,ut*riul, "nd, -s/Find the granvaward to be feasible to the needs of Augusta Richmond county o Deny the request Finance Dircctor 2.) I have reviewcd the Grant application and encrosed materiars and: gzApprove the Dcpartment Agency to move forward with the application 6 Den) the request J -tv. tt Date z /tz tq Date This form will also be used to provide the external auditors with information on all grants for compliance andcertification requirements as requircd by the state and Fedcrat Government Uscr: MHI708l Rcport: GMI000_ - Manhong He Page Current D.tc: O2l13tZOlT Current Time: l5:28:04 PROPOSAL - GMl000: Granrs Managernent: I Grant Coordinator Givic Affmbru ['"mt*'xdartkqrm un1sDG initiative MEMORANDUM To: Georgia County lnternship Program (GCIP) Grant Recipients for Summer 2017 Grant Period From: Michele NeSmith, ACCG Research and Policy Development Director Re: County Grant Package Date: February 9,2O!7 Congratulations on being a grant recipient for the Summer 2017 Georgia County lnternship Program {GCIP)! We hope that this internship is mutually beneficial to both the county and intern. The grant period is from May 1, 2017-september L,2077. Reimbursement requests with accompanying proof of hire must be submitted to the Foundation no later than Monday, September L8,2077 . Please read this memo and allthe materials included in this packet in their entirety before you submit the requested documents. Itis very important for the county to establish one point person to manage allthe requirements for the GCIP grant. The point person will need to work closely with the Human Resources Department, or the person who manages the county's hiring practices in that there are many employment related forms that must be completed by the county and the intern close to the date of hire. While the Foundation is aware that it may take time to have your board formally approve the grant agreement please make every effort to return it as soon as possible. When an intern has been hired, the Foundation should be notified and a copy of the lntern Consent Form and the lntern lnformation Form should be submitted, The county should not wait until the end of the grant period to submit this information. Enclosed in this packet is the grant agreement, a list of frequently asked questions, an intern consent form, an intern information form, a grant reimbursement form, an E-Verify usage and acknowledgement form, a grant checklist, a copy of your county's original grant application, and an intern supervisor's guide. ln order to receive the grant funds, the county must submit the following to the Foundation: 1) Signed Grant Agreement - as soon as possible 2l Signed lntern Consent Form - at the beginning of the internship 3) Signed and Completed lntern lnformation Form - at the beginning of the internship 4l Proof of Hire (offer letter 49! a copy of the E-Verify Usage and Acknowledgement Form) - by September t8,2OL7 5l Signed and Completed Grant Reimbursement Form - by September 18, 2017 6) Proof of Payment- by September t8,2OL7 Once the county has submitted this information, the Foundation will issue grant funds for the wages, workers' compensation coverage and Federal lnsurance Contributions Act (FICA) for the county internship positions that have been approved by the Foundation. The money provided for FICA and workers' compensation must be used for these purposes.The county ls required to cover all interns hired through the GCIP under their workers' compensation policy. Please note that your county will not receive any grant fundint until you have submitted ALL the requested information and provide proof that an intern has been hired, Over the course of the internship, the Foundation will be checking in with the internship supervisor(s) for your county to ensure that the internship is going smoothly. The Foundation will also be visiting certain counties in order to interview the intern(s) and supervisor(s) and to take photos to promote the program. All visits will be scheduled prior to arrival. lf you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at mnesmith@accq.ore ot al404-522-5022. Thanks again for your participation in this program. Givic Affairs Foundation .n..1$OE initiative February 8,2OL7 Ms. Kari Kitchens 402 Taylor Street Augusta, GA 30901 Dear Kari: I am pleased to inform you that Augusta-Richmond County has been awarded a Georgia County lnternship Program (GCIP) grant from the ACCG Civic Affairs Foundation. This grant is awarded for the 2017 summer program in the amount of 54000 for the Public Defender intern project to cover two internships. The grant provided must be used to fund costs associated with the intern's salary, FICA, and worker's compensation as specified in the grant contact. A grant contract package is enclosed for you to complete and return. Please contact Michele NeSmith at mnesmith@accs.ors or aL404-522-5022 if you need assistance in publicizing the proposed internship position. While the Foundation will post this position through their website and help to publicize it through other channels, it is the responsibility of the county to recruit, interview and hire the intern. ln the event your county is unable to hire a summer intern for the project description provided, the Brant award designated for this purpose will be rescinded and will be used by the Foundation to fund future internship grants. Congratulations and thank you for participating in the GCIP summer grant program. Sincerely, F\ Ross King ACCG Civic Affairs Fou ndation Secreta ry-Treasu rer cc: Mayor Hardie Davis Janice Jackson Lena Bonner Applicants should read the entire GCIP Application Packet prior to completing this form. This apolication has two sections. Section I reouires the aoplicant to provide answers to a series of questions and Section ll reouires a detailed descriotion of the internshio proiect beins orooosed, the need it addresses, and the expected benefits to the counw. More lnformation on how to complete the application can be found in the GclP Application Process and Guidelines document. The application deadline for summer 2017 GCIP Srants is Friday, December 2, 2016. Applications should besentto Michele Nesmith atthe Foundation via email to mnesmith@accs.o rs, by FAX to 404-589-7879 (note Ms. Nesmith as the recipient), or by mail to: civic Affairs Foundation 191 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30303 Please note that factors that influence consideration include but are not limited to the type of project submitted, the overall impact and benefit to the county of the pro,ect(s) proposed, the ability to partially fund the internship position(s!, collaboration with other counties, regional commissions, colleges/universities, and/or non-profits, and the number of interns requested. Reminder: lnterns should be currentlv enrolled in college as undergraduate or graduate students, or have recently graduated from college within one year of the grant period. High school students are not eligible. lnterns cannot work more than 200 total hours during the grant period. The county and the intern can decide how many hours the intern works per week and the total number of weeks worked, It is recommended that the minimum hours worked per week be no less than 15 hours, Section I Number of interns requested for 2 ur County Name:Richmond Provide County E-Verify Number:74t651 ACCG Civic Affairs Foundation / 191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 / Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ph(4O4\522-5O22 Georgia County lnternship Program Grant Application Summer 2Ot7 I l Are you submitting an application that includes a partner?nYes XNo List partners: ls your partner a nonprofit, college or List contribution level (Portners con include other counties, regionol commissions, colleges/universities, ond/or non-profit orgonizotions. Portnerships with colleges/universities, ond/or non-profit orgonizotions must inc!ude ot leost o 25% lunding contribution from-Ssoo (zsx)Other Name of Primary Contact: I Kari Kitchens County:Richmond Department:Circuit Public Defender Position:Director of Grant lnitiatives Address:402 Taylor Street Augusta, GA 30901 Email kkitch ens @gap u bdef.org Phone: I 478-62L-6370 ls the county providing partial funding of the amount needed to fund the E yes X No internship? (Total cost of the internship is 52000 plus FICA and WC) What amount? OR ls the county providing additionalfunding? (on top of the grant amount) E Yes E trto What amount? Who will be the supervisor for the intern? E Same as primary county contact X Other Name:Kate Mason Office of the Public Defender Position:Circuit Public Defender Email:706-312-5105 Has this individual rvised interns?XYes n No s adequate space available to support an intern?XYes tr No s adequate equipment available (computer, software programs, etc.) for the X Yes E No ntern to complete the proposed project(s)? Will outside technical assistance be required for the intern to complete the E Yes X No project? lf Yes, who will provide it: Has your county previously had an intern?XYes tr No ACCG Civic Affairs Foundation / 191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 / Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ph(4041522-5022 2 Has your county ever had an intern in this field?XYes n No Did your county previously receive a Georgia County lnternship Program X Yes n No (GCIP) grant for interns? ls there a college or university located in your county?XYes n No ls there a technical college located in your county?XYes tr No What special skills should the intern have to be able to complete the project, such as knowledge of certain types of software, experience using certain types of equipment, etc.? (Note this is for a student so years of work in a certain field should not be included.) Will any specialtraining be provided to the intern?XYes tr No lf Yes, please describe:The four pillars of implementing a Holistic Defense Section ll lnternship position title: I Law Clerk Summer ln the grav space below, please FULLY describe the internship position being proposed. the need it addresses, the benefits to the countv. and the necessarv intern qualifications. The space will expand when vou start to tvpe. lnclude no more than 1-2 additional pages to describe the internship. More information can be found in the GCIP Application Process and Guidelines document "My time at the Augusta Public Defender was an invaluable learning experience that allowed me to grow substantially as an advocate. First, I was given the opportunity to represent clients in a variety of proceedings, such as bond hearings, arraignments, preliminary hearings, and first appearances. This was the first time I was able to represent clients in Court and speak on the record. This hands on lega! experience was enhanced by an office full of extremely knowledgeable attorneys and support staff who were always willing to help me improve. Additionally, while working at the Augusta Public Defender, I was able to work on practical writing tasks that I would encounter in a career as a Public Defender. After interning at the Public Defender, lfeel as though the knowledge learned from school ACCG Civic Affairs Foundation / 191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 / Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ph(40 4lt522-5022 Pro lnformation [- seamlessly combined with the real life duties of a Public Defender, to prepare me for a career in criminal defense work." Rachel Dolly, Juris Doctor Candidate ,2OL7 We are appreciative for the funding through the Civic Affairs Foundation FY 15 that allowed for two paid interns to work in our office, one of whom is Ms. Dolly and quoted above. Through the funding received by ACCG internship grant, two students were able to gain real- life experience serving as public advocates for the indigent, and very possibly cementing their future career in public defense work. As we continue to implement our strategic planning efforts in instituting a holistic defense practice, we respectfully submit this proposal for funding two law interns for FY 17. We will recruit second-year law interns through the Career Development Office of the University of Georgia School of Law to be posted from March 1, 2017-March L5,2017. Two interns will be selected and notified by March 31, 2017. The interns shall work a total of 180 hours between May 1, 2OL7 and August 3L,2OL7 (but no more than 15 hours a week). lt is at this point that our office desires to expand our current internship program to include second year law students enrolled in the University of Georgia Schoolof Low. Focusing on the holistic defense module, our interns will interact directly with clients, learn how to interview clients, conduct a need's assessment, set up tegal files, assist in trial preparation (defense theories & plea process) and become adept in understanding the client- centered process in implementing a Holistic Defense module. Direct supervision of the interns will be provided by the Circuit Public Defender of the Augusta Judicia! Circuit, Ms. Kate Mason, who will also conduct the overall performance evaluation. Fiscal management of these funds will be the responsibility of the Augusta-Richmond County Government Finance Department, with the Augusta-Richmond County Government Human Resources responsible for ensuring compliance with all other employment issues, to include citizenship, drug screens and adherence to the employment process. Office space will be provided by the Office of the Public Defender's office and equipped with computer, internet access, a telephone and access to client files and the state case management system will be provided to the interns. Budget Each intern shallwork a tota! of 180 hours between May l and Augusta.3O, no more than 15 hours a week. Compensation of SfO.OO/per hour x 180 hours totals 51,800. FICA is calculated at7.65% and Workers Compensation is calculated at 3.5% totaling SZO1.OO per intern to be reimbursed to the Finance Department. We respectfully request funding for two interns, for a total project cost of 54,000. Total per intern: 52,000 Total for two interns: 54,000 ACCG Civic Affairs Foundation / 191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 / Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ph(aO4)522-5022 4 For questions, email or call (4041522-5022 ext. 195 The Georgia County lnternship Program is offered by the ACCG Civic Affairs Foundation thanks to the generosity and support of private donors. The Foundation is a nonprofit organization established as an initiative by ACCG, Georgia's county association. For more information, visit www.civicaffairs.ors. ACCG Civic Affairs Foundation / 191 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 / Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ph( Oq522-5O22 5 Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Garden City Rescue Mission Department:Clerk of Commission Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Motion to approve a request from Mr. Patrick Feistel of the Garden City Rescue Mission for an abatement of taxes for the tax year 2016.(Approved by Finance Committee February 28, 2017) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Commission meetings: First and third Tuesdays of each month - 2:00 p.m. Committee meetings: Second and last Tuesdays of each month - 1:00 p.m. Commission/Commiffee: (Please check one and insert meeting date) Commission Public Safety Commiffee Public Services Committee Administrative Services Committee Engineering Services Committee Finance Committee Date of Meeting Date of Meeting Date of Meeting Date of Meeting Date of Meeting Date of Meeting Contact Information for Individual/Presenter Making the Request: Telephone N a,.-l Fax Number:'la E-Mail Address: Caption/Topic of Discussion to be placed on the Agenda: t-)'7 yixs,r"t Please send this request form to the following address: Ms. Lena J. Bonner Clerk of Commission Suite 220 Municipal Building 535 Telfair Street Augusta, GA 30901 Telephone Number: 7 06-821-1820 Fax Number: 706-821-1838 E-MailAddress: nmorawski@augustaga.gov Requests may be faxed, e-mailed or delivered in person and must be received in the Clerk's Oflice no later than 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the Commission meefing and 5:00 p.m. on the Tuesday preceding the Committee meeting of the following week. A five- minute time limit will be allowed for presentations. Steven B. Kendrick Tax Commissioner 535 Telfair St. Ste 100 Augusta, GA 30901 MAKE CHECK OH MONEY ORDEH PAYABLE TO: Richmond CountY Tax Commissioner INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE ------ -- ------- ------- d;il;i-orn:lfi:,i"imrl?,ffflrr$.?ilmaru,Ei*]11*i]f;,]"lif,],3,"iij :jilislttJi rhia ic rrarrr ihit'tv dgjulii{rn'ry'E?l"t",xi?^"drit[,'f,ffi[is?'l,Trsx'il'#:'ilnliq:ii:?_ili,?Fit'!:f1""fr:ffT:alftt 6w[. itre -Cenerat Execution Docket.is I accounts, except accounts p.rotectedty'Sirlirirpt;v. raws, _wiii iriillirrieo civeiiJ ofs, our service provider for levy and tax sate procee-dings, once tfie-iiia iias-been iecorded' *lli,fi#'I1TjfiL?;,1#1l"","lXlff +:Birfiiiiff3"1nil?,"il,lXiJfl'Jff:B1ffifiH"$.L"'f,:1[i'1i3"'1"1ffJi; days of this statemd;i:F;AtieJtions, iall 706'821-2391' ro insure that your remitrance i.9 postea to the.3pPl9ll1{:{X'f;iiiiilB3lSJitsflf;:lpavabre to "Hichmond 6il1nU id'&',dEaionii's oflide" and write the tax year ar 11712017 Tax Due 6261.56 Map: 047-3'102'00-0 00Bb?0 (?/3t--- ptrrtr^RrH FouND^rrffif"t'#hti8iEx ttiuZ[iir DrALYsrs RESEARcH FoUNDA lll^lHhh llol,[l'-.'r. bEE?E',.1'ir,"* t' uq?3IoABoE eElb8eq5?u behl,sh uuuu000 eBl,701lb 5 Return top portion with paymen!:----------- NoTICE:Taxesforotheryearsmaybeoutstandingonthisproperty. Map: 047'3'102'00'0 Tax ***rt*tt****t.t.** INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE tt*rtt*ttrt*ttt*tt" ffi INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE RICHMoNDCoUNTYaxft0€r:AUGUSTADIALYSISRESEARoHFoUNDATIoNINc Steven B. Kendrick Tax Commissioner 535 Tellair St. Ste 100 Augusta, GA 30901 MAKE CHECK OR MONEY ORDER PAYABLE TO: Bichmond CountY Tax Commissioner ------- --------------- -- our records indicate that you owe propertv taxes as llsleo oerow' rur)uar'r '- ir'ti'di'bJcret of the clerk of this is vour thirty O"ai'iiotiiJot'o=ui iniJniiil;"'d i tiia on the General Exet :$B:+flr"i#:,f:im'li1'l"itll'i,y;Jffi[ls",.. fll e"*llhi:lllr-i#T5+.',ws]$fui:Hl,nl accounts, except accounts p.rotected by b;rlrlririricil"*n *_ill also be turned ove i;;["*;';il14';al;;;;t'Aind!,6ncetttetitahas-beenrecorded' Additionary, interest wi, continue to be assessed against the principar balance due at the rate of 1olo per month for a, derinquenr tax years. ro di"iEiifiis-e-i=ddrli6naichirge's, pteasJiemiittre total due within 10 liliii',ir il., i J staiemiii.'Fdi i desii on s, ia I I 706-821 -23s 1 . To insure that your remittance _ig posted- to !.he.pppr_9_qriate bir, prease make your check payable to "Richmond county rax commiiliJirt?;i'6rli&;;nd ivriiilfiE'taiyear a"rit'riiiinumuer ori vour check' INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE 11612017 Tax Due 903.10 ilr,,llilltltllliltltlll'tlltllllttllltll'hlll,lrr"lllltl"l'l 006h8l,xxxl1IXED AADC 308*reEiuZuiir oirlvsrs RESEARCH FoUNDATT0N 1],q FULL IlOON LN sAVANNAH 6A 3l,tl0t-8548 MaP: 046'2-162-00-0 ,,, . Bfd"''if*ti&Er sr ttE8?'1",[fr'"*.t 0qba1heoBo eBlb8?3q80 1031 0uu00D0 ao1?01Bt 0 Retu rn top p9rt191 yil!- p-qv-nq l!, -;,^:::-:;-;;;, ^*" nronerrv raxes as tisted below. Pursuant to 499-r9i1^c-o,-!9 t":*|fi,''* NOTICE: Taxes for other years may be outstanding on this property' Tax Due:903.10Map: 046'2'162'00-0 .r*tttlta*'*tt*tr*r INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE $iffsffii$S:i 813.02 8.78 81.30 0.00 0.00 903.10 201 6 873480 42689 INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE RICHMoNDCoUNTVa@er:AUGUSTADIALYSISRESEARoHFoUNDATIoNI/2 MaP: 046'4'099-00-0 ffi I I E biil. ;il i i. r s R E s E A R c H F 0 uND A "BffE'*t"ifiiEr sr iavrnr,mu 6A 3r,qob-Bsas bEf?tllfti,rcKsr 0r{bqu11BE0 aEl,t6Pq5E8 8e?5 00BB0B0 aE}?u}uE 3 Beturn top p9rt191 yil! P-aII9!!'- - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ a- ----------------- our records indicate that you owe pr_operty taxes as listgd below. Pursuant to Georoia Gode section 48-3-3' rhis is your thirty day notice or oui intJ,li'tIiJJoiJ ;-rl'dii'i66 be'ntrii executioi Docket of the clerk or #i:+{itrl:,il;iiri:"ui[rJ';Jffir*'I,";r;l,rllliLxaq:iiii{plJl,T:rit#61l8li8",?lafi accounts, excepr accounts p_rotecred uy .6i[.[rti,i;i$G *iiiiGii-6i turiea oler to Dfs, our service provider ffi Eld';hd .1l-a-ja 6-pr;Lil[i ni!, o n cd the f if a has-been recorded. Additionalry, interest wiil continue to be assessed ag?iT.gt the principal balance due at the rate ol 1o/o per, month for alt delinquent tax year-s. ro dleiEiiifiese a-aiitioriiicfitig1?,i, please remit the total due within 10 iilJ 6t tti i J ttiiem6nt. Fo r q riesti on s, ia I I 7 06-821'2391' To insure that your remittance i9 posted to the.spProp{1t9-!il!,.q!9ase T+9I9.II check payable to "Richmond county Tax commiiiii'ir:ii;i o*i&; dna iwiiJtrEiaiyear aio'diil number oi vour check' NOTICE: Taxes for other years may be outstanding on this property' Steven B. Kendrick Tax Commissioner 535 Telfair St. Ste 100 Augusta, GA 30901 MAKE CHECK OR MONEY ORDER PAYABLE TO: Richmond CountY Tax Commissioner 046-4-099-00-0 INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE 11712017 Tax Due 82.75 82.75Tax Due: fi*rttt**t"tt,tt*** INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE **'*rtt*tti*t*tt***t INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE RIQHMOND COUNTYax@&er: AUGUSTA DIALYSIS BESEARCH FOUNDATISN lNc ------------------------ 0qrt{108000 e0l,b8aq5t1 815? 0080000 P01?01'0b q our records indicate that you owe property taxes as listed below. Pursuant to Georoia Gode Section 48-3'3' rhis is your thirty dlri"ndtice ol oui iniiniii'iJ"-oii ;-ri6ii'idii bEhlrii executioi Docket or the clerk or :$i:+{i%H:ril':i}rill1',:li[1",3,';Jffi["€:'J."irli llllalil'i3.:iisF#ll"TEit#slLtiB",?:a$i accounts. except accounts protected oiti"'i'rl=piryHwi iliiiiliii 6" turnea b'ver to Dis, ourservice provider i;r-t;rt';hd EiGaG ,roceebings, once-the fila has-been recorded' Additionally, interest will continue to be asses-sed ag?iT.?t th-e principal balarce due at the rate of 1olo per month for a1 delinquent rax years. ro iieiEnii[eiJa-oiitt6,il'l c[iig-ei, ptease remit the total due within 10 dlVJof tfriJ itatement. For q[estions, Call 706'821'2391' To insure that your remittance is posted to the-appropriate bill,.please Pakg!9l1r check payable to "Richmond 6r;UTd'6;';;6,onli;Jotriie; anii i,'rriiJtriiiay'year and'liilt number oi vour check' NOTTCE: Taxes for other years may be outstanding on this property. Map: 046-4-100-00-0 Steven B. Kendrick Tax Gommissioner sa6-ietil-ii 51. ste 1oo Augusta, GA 30901 MAKE CHECK OR MONEY ORDER PAYABLETO: Richmond County Tax Commissioner r."sxt 000t?O ()'/3) ffis ilf'Pll,-'iltbl'rs RESEAR.H SAvANNAH 6A 31,q0t-85e8 INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE MaP: 046'4'100-00'0 Descriotion: F ouN DAT ilUlf, E'EtlWlGK ST Location: 834 FENWICK ST 1t712017 Tax Due 89.57 Return top Portion with PaYment. Lri ,!tiririii<r:. ;\s.Bllfii{i}.i. { t j-a:\*rE i;'!r':iiL rijiloks'$:i;frffi$S ItIlI=lt$ir.rq 201 6 824569 42689 80.52 1.00 8.05 0.00 0.00 89.57 Tax Due: $rt**r**tr*ilttt.*, INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE *tt*titttt***tt**ttt 89.57 INTENT TO FIFA NOTICE RICHMOND COUNTYaxfre,er: AUGUSTA DIALYSIS RESEABCH F6UNDATI6N lNc Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM SPLOST 7 agreement with Augusta Coliseum Authority Department:Finance Department:Finance Caption:Motion to approve agreement with Augusta Coliseum Authority for funding as authorized in SPLOST Phase VII. (Approved by Finance Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Project funding in the amount of $6,000,000 for the Augusta Coliseum Authority was approved in the SPLOST 7 referendum. The Augusta Coliseum Authority project is for facility renovations, improvements and or facility replacement Analysis:Funding for the project will be provided per the following schedule that was approved by the commission on February 16, 2016: $1,500,000 – December 2016 $4,500,000 - December 2017 Disbursement of funds is subject to collections and will be made in accordance with the attached agreement upon approval by the governing body. Financial Impact:Funding is authorized in SPLOST 7 Alternatives:n/a Recommendation:approve agreement Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 329-06-4310/5721110 216067102/5721110 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Cover Memo Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 15th Street Bridge Rehabilitation over Augusta Canal Water Line Relocation (AUD Bid 16-127) Department:Engineering Department:Engineering Caption:Motion to approve supplementing the Augusta Utilities Department contract with Blair Construction, Inc., not to exceed $114,945 to cover the additional costs of water line relocation for the 15th Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Currently, Blair Construction is under contract with Augusta Utilities Department (AUD) for the canal embank repair in the vicinity of the 15th Street Bridge project area. Water line improvements were included in the AUD bid for which Blair submitted a bid schedule accordingly. However, pre-award assessment yielded reduced scope that was limited to canal embankment repair only. At present the water line is attached to the 15th Street Bridge; it is AED' assessment that relocation is warranted to restore historic appearance and complete intended improvements. AED discussed additional funding requirements for the relocation of the waterline with GDOT. Analysis:Blair Construction is a local utility contractor currently under contract for similar work for AUD. The cost provided of $114,945 includes contingency to relocation cost for erosion & water quality management and site control. This cost was analyzed and determined to be reasonable and cost effective for the nature of work being performed. Financial Impact:GDOT is providing additional funds of $171,000 to complete the project. Alternatives:1) Motion to supplement the Augusta Utilities Department contract with Blair Construction, Inc., not to exceed $114,945 to cover the additional costs of water line relocation for the 15th Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project as requested by AED. 2) Do Cover Memo not approve and find an alternative to complete the project and meet TIA project completion requirements. Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: GDOT Funds REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Blair Construction, Inc.Proposal Asphalt Paving & Underground Utilities 4308 Evans-to-Locks Rd DATE:January 9, 2017 P.O. Box 770, Evans, Georgia 30809 Phone 706.868.1950 Fax 706.868.1855 AUD Attn: Anthony Taylor Job# 16098 Description Quantity Unit Price AMOUNT Watermain, 12" RJDIP W-2A 150 LF 116.20$ 17,430.00$ Misc. Pipe Fittings W-4 2645 LBS 3.85$ 10,183.25$ Fire Hyd. Complete w/ Valves,Fittings, and Pipe W-5 1 EA 5,694.70$ 5,694.70$ Gate Valve 12"W-7A 2 EA 2,549.07$ 5,098.14$ 2" Short Side Water Service for Testing Purposes W-14A 2 EA 2,013.86$ 4,027.72$ Tie to Existing Water Main 12"W-16 2 EA 4,222.12$ 8,444.24$ 12" HDPE Directional Drill W-21 405 LF 113.32$ 45,894.60$ Lump Sum Construction LS-1 1 LS 7,722.54$ 7,722.54$ TOTAL 104,495.19$ Note: Butts Memorial Bridge Waterline Improvements The Above proposal is based on Section "B" of the original bid dated January 28, 2016. Section "B" was removed from the contract July 11, 2016. In the event that Canal and Bridge Improvents have changed the scope of the original utility bid, additional charges will be required. Additional charges will be required for any erosion control. All erosion control items were included in Section "A", which were installed and removed as part of our contract. Preconstruction Status Report Pre Parcel CT Total Parcel in ROW System:Cond Field:Acquired by:N/R DEEDS CT: Under Review Options Pending:Relocations:Acquisition MGR: Released Condemnations – Pend:Acquired:ROW Cert Date: PI NUMBER:0011422 CR 1499/15TH STREET @ AUGUSTA CANAL - TIA COUNTY:Richmond SPONSOR:Augusta/Richmond County MEASURE:BASELINE LET DT:MGMT LET DT:Print Date:02/21/17 LENGTH(MI):0.40 MPO:Augusta TMA DESIGN FIRM:SCHED LET DT:MGMT ROW DT:Page:1 PROJ NO:TIP#:RC07-001221 PRIORITY CD:TIA LIGHTING TYP:None WHO LETS?:GDOT Let PROJ MGR:Brewer, George MODEL YR:DOT DIST:2 ENV DOC TYPE:LET WITH:0 AOHD INITIALS:MDD TYPE WORK:Bridges CONG. DIST:012 ENV CONSULTANT: OFFICE:TIA CONCEPT: BIKE:N CONSULTANT:PROG TYPE:Reconstruction/Rehabili tation SUFF: BASE START BASE FINISH TASKS START DATE FINISH DATE ACTUAL START ACTUAL FINISH % LGPA :TO BE DETERMINED Programming :TIA PROJECT|CST 1625 12-2016 Utility :TIA-NO DISTRICT UTILITY COORDINATION Phase Approved Proposed Program Cost Fund Status Date Auth PE 2014 2014 $222,450.57 TIA AUTHORIZED 8/27/13 CST 2014 2014 $171,000.00 02009 AUTHORIZED 9/13/13 CST 2014 2014 $1,268,606.43 TIA AUTHORIZED 9/13/13 COST EST AMTS PE $222,450.57 8/20/13 CST $1,439,606.43 8/20/13 STIP AMOUNTS Activity Cost Fund PE $200,689.00 TIA CST $1,290,368.00 TIA CST $0.00 02009 Project Manager 1 Hameed Malik From:Brewer, George <gbrewer@dot.ga.gov> Sent:Tuesday, February 21, 2017 11:24 AM To:Hameed Malik Cc:Wilkinson, Eric; Mullins, Kelvin; Amin, Shrujal Subject:0011422 Richmond - 15th Street at the Augusta Canal Attachments:Augusta Meeting with Russell.docx; 0011422psr.pdf Hameed, This is to confirm that $171,000.00 in LMIG funds have been added to the above noted project as was stated in your meeting with the commissioner last fall. If any additional information is needed, please let me know. George Brewer TIA Preconstruction Manager Georgia Department of Transportation 600 West Peachtree Street, 11th Floor Atlanta, Georgia 30308 706.832.0917 – cell Pedestrian deaths are surging in Georgia - 206 people were killed while walking in 2015. With pedestrian deaths up 37% in two years, Georgia DOT’s SEE & BE SEEN campaign, in partnership with PEDS, aims to make it safer to walk in Georgia. Safety is a shared responsibility. Walkers and drivers: Pay attention. Walkers: make sure you can SEE & BE SEEN. Drivers: Slow down (speed kills). Visit www.dot.ga.gov/DS/SafetyOperation/SBS. #ArriveAliveGA Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 319(h) Grant_ Development of 9-Element Watershed Management Plan Department:Engineering Department:Engineering Caption:Motion to approve and authorize the Engineering Department (AED) to accept and receive federal financial assistance through Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Implication Grant Program. Also, grant authorization permitting the Augusta, GA’s Mayor to sign all documentation as requested by the AED.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The Clean Water Act Section 319(h) Water Quality Grant Funds support activities to identify and implement projects for reduction of prioritized risks and concerns in the community such as source assessment and control of pollutant of interest load within state listed impaired water bodies. During 2016, AED in partnering with Phinizy Center for Water Sciences (PCWS) submitted two (2) separate applications to seek federal funds for various activities associated with surface water quality improvement program in Rocky Creek Watershed. Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) evaluated and recommended both applications to US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for funding. However, one of the pre-requisite for EPA to fund 319(h) grant is development of 9-Element Watershed Restoration Plan (if not already in place). There is no existing watershed restoration plan for Rocky Creek Watershed and it needs to be developed. Analysis:Development of 9-Element Watershed Management Plan for selected watersheds in Savannah River Basin is critical for receiving future 319 grants in addition to already approved two FY-16 grants. PCWS under existing MOU is collaborating in these grants and will develop this plan. Four (4) of Augusta creeks are listed as impaired waterbodies and do not support their designated use. The 319 Grants allow AED to optimize Augusta MS4 NPDES Stormwater Management Program. There are minimum matching funds required. AED will meet this need primarily by offering in-kind services such as staff time. AED will also utilize $5,000 of its stormwater services contractual program. Cover Memo Financial Impact:By accepting this Grant, AED will receive $40,000 in federal funds. AED will provide $10,226 matching non-federal funds [$5,226 in-kind, and $5,000 from Stormwater Services Contractual Program]. Alternatives:1). Approve and authorize the Engineering Department (AED) to accept and receive federal financial assistance through Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Implication Grant Program. Also, grant authorization permitting the Augusta, GA’s Mayor to sign all documentation as requested by the AED. 2). Do not approve and drop the 319(h) FY-16 funding acceptance for the approved two (2) grants. Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: $5,226 in-kind; $5,000 in SWU Contract Services REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 1 APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK ELEMENT 15 FY2015 Section 319(h) Grant 1. Project Title: Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan for the Augusta Canal (HUC-12 #030601060601) / Butler Creek (HUC-12 #030601060602) / Beaverdam Ditch (HUC-12 #030601060607) Watersheds in Savannah River Basin 2. Lead Organization: Augusta, GA (AKA Augusta-Richmond County) Address: 535 Telfair Street, Bldg.4000 City, State: Augusta, GA Zip: 30901 Phone: (706) 796-5040 Fax: (706)796-5045 Primary Contact: Hameed Malik, Ph.D., P.E. Title: Assistant Director of Engineering Organization: Augusta-Richmond County Address: 535 Telfair Street, Bldg.4000 City, State: Augusta, GA Zip: 30901 Phone: (706) 796-5040 Fax: (706) 796-5045 Email: hmalik@augustaga.gov Project Start Date: April 1, 2017 Project End Date: March 31, 2018 Federal Amount: $40,000 Match Amount: $10,266 Total Amount: $50,266 3. Project Goals: The goal of this project is for Augusta-Richmond County to develop a nine-element watershed management plan (WMP) for the Augusta Canal (HUC-12 #030601060601) / Butler Creek (HUC-12 #030601060602) / Beaverdam Ditch (HUC-12 #030601060607) watersheds in the Savannah River Basin. The WMP will address the impaired streams in the watershed that are not supporting their designated uses on the 2014 Georgia 305(b)/303(d) List of Waters, and target Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) established by Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) for the impairments. Following USEPA and GAEPD guidelines for watershed planning, the WMP development process will assess current best management practices (BMPs) to determine whether they have been effective in reducing the pollutants. Local stakeholders, governments and other Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 2 organizations will be engaged/re-engaged as watershed partners. Issues of concern and land-use data will be updated and evaluated. Water quality data will be collected and analyzed. Pollutant load limits will be quantified and compared to required TMDLs and load reductions. Management practices specifically designed to achieve the explicit load allocations will be recommended and implementation milestones will be targeted. A long-term monitoring plan will be designed. STEPL MODEL USEPA or Region V Model, along with previous management efforts, will be applied to estimate load reduction expectations from BMPs. Final strategies for the WMP will be developed. Once Georgia EPD approves the WMP, watershed partners will be in a position to implement recommended BMPs. Strong and diversely broad partnerships formed within the watershed will enable stakeholders to achieve the goals set in the plan. 4. Project Background: The GAEPD’s 2014 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List of Waters identifies four stream segments in the three HUC-12 watersheds as not meeting water quality standards for fecal coliform, three for biota fish, and two for biota macroinvertebrates: http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/related_files/site_page/CY_2014_305b303d_St reams.pdf Butler Creek (Boardmans Pond to Phinizy Ditch (formerly to SR 56)), 9 miles in Richmond County; Butler Creek (Phinizy Ditch to Savannah River, Augusta), 3 miles in Richmond County; Rae’s Creek (Headwaters to Cranes Creek), 4 miles in Richmond County; Reed Creek (Rd. S1727 to Bowen Pond near Martinez), 8 miles in Columbia County; Rocky Creek (Headwaters to SR 56 (formerly to Phinizy Ditch)), 6 miles in Richmond County; and Rocky Creek (SR 56 to below New Savannah Road, Augusta), 2 miles in Richmond County. Total Daily Maximum Loads (TMDLs) for fecal coliform were completed in 2000 for one segment of Butler Creek (Phinizy Ditch to Savannah River, Augusta) http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/related_files/site_page/EPA_Butler_Creek_Fec al_TMDL.pdf and one Rocky Creek segment (SR 56 to below New Savannah Road, Augusta) http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/related_files/site_page/EPA_Rocky_Creek_Fec al_TMDL.pdf ; and in 2000, updated in 2005, for Reed Creek http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/related_files/site_page/EPA_Reed_Creek_Feca l_TMDL.pdf (2000) http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/related_files/site_page/Final_Savannah_Fecal_ TMDL.pdf (2005) A DRAFT fecal coliform TMDL for the other segment of Butler Creek (Boardmans Pond to Phinizy Ditch (formerly to SR 56)) http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/related_files/site_page/Savannah%20Fecal%20 Coliform%20TMDL%20Report%20%5B2016%5D.pdf and DRAFT biota macroinvertebrate TMDLs for both segments of Rocky Creek plus DRAFT biota fish TMDLs for Rae’s Creek and both segments of Rocky Creek http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/related_files/site_page/Savannah%20Biota%20 Impacted%20TMDL%20Report%20%5B2016%5D.pdf were all developed in 2016 and are pending final USEPA approval. Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 3 Bacteria Impairment Fecal coliform TMDL Implementation Plans for the HUC-10 #0306010606 watershed (formerly #0306010605) were written in 2002 for Butler Creek (Phinizy Ditch to Savannah River, Augusta) http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/tmdl/TMDL_Implementation_Plans/Savannah/ 0306010605/TMDLIP_ButlerCreek_FC_0306010605_Y2002.pdf and Rocky Creek (SR 56 to below New Savannah Road, Augusta) http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/tmdl/TMDL_Implementation_Plans/Savannah/ 0306010605/TMDLIP_RockyCreek_FC_0306010605_Y2002.pdf and Reed Creek (Rd. S1727 to Bowen Pond near Martinez) http://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/files/tmdl/TMDL_Implementation_Plans/Savannah/ 0306010605/TMDLIP_ReedCreek_FC_0306010605_Y2002.pdf According to the plans and/or the TMDLs, possible non-point sources (NPS) that contribute to fecal coliform bacteria impairment include stormwater runoff from surrounding urban land uses; undetected septic or sewer leakage; and possible wildlife. The following recommendations were made to reduce non-point source (NPS) pollutant loads of bacteria in Butler Creek (Phinizy Ditch to Savannah River, Augusta) by 98%, in Rocky Creek by 80% and in Reed Creek by 75% (2005 TMDL, pages v and 33) and in Butler Creek (Boardmans Pond to Phinizy Ditch (formerly to SR 56)) by 49% (2016 DRAFT TMDL pages vi and 25): Septic tank survey to determine the number, age and functionality of the septic tanks Additional proactive measures to prevent leaks and spills from the sanitary sewer system Educational programs in the curricula of local schools Initiate a public educational campaign in the form of television, radio and print announcements and advertisements Adopt the Georgia Stormwater Management Manual as a policy for local development in regulating stormwater flow in developing areas of the watershed Manage stormwater runoff through methods like erosion control and the establishment of green spaces, park lands, and stream buffers Consistent water quality monitoring tied by school groups, concerned citizen groups, or County officials. Biota Impacted According to the TMDL, a healthy aquatic ecosystem requires a healthy habitat. The possible non-point sources (NPS) of sediment that may contribute to biota impacted macroinvertebrate and fish impairment are eroded soils from timber harvesting; cropland and livestock grazing; mining sites; unpaved roads; and urban land disturbance and impervious surfaces. The TMDL recommended that there be no net increase in sediment delivered to the impaired stream segments, so that these streams will recover over time. The following recommendations were made in the TMDL to control current non-point sources (NPS) of sediment entering Rae’s Creek and both segments of Rocky Creek in order to maintain and/or reduce the total allowable sediment loads at current levels (2016 DRAFT TMDL pages viii and 45): Implementation of Georgia’s Best Management Practices for Forestry (GFC, 2009); Implementation of Best Management Practices for Georgia Agriculture (GSWCC, 2013) and Adoption of NRCS Conservation Practices for agriculture; Adherence to the Surface Mining Land Use Plan prepared as part of the Surface Mining Permit Application; Implementation of the Georgia Better Back Roads Field Manual (GA RCDC, 2009) and Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 4 adoption of additional practices for proper unpaved road maintenance; Implementation of individual Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans for land disturbing activities; and application of the Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control in Georgia (GSWCC, 2014); and Implementation of the Georgia Stormwater Management Manual (ARC, 2001) to facilitate prevention and mitigation of stream bank erosion due to increased stream flow and velocities caused by urban runoff through structural storm water BMP installation. In addition, the TMDL states that the most common cause of low IBI (fish) and MMI (benthic macroinvertebrates) scores is the lack of in-stream habitat due to stream sedimentation. Habitat and aquatic communities can be slow to respond to changes in sediment loading, which is why assessment and monitoring must continue to gauge whether BMP implementations have improved stream habitats and water quality, representing an indirect measurement of the TMDL. 5. Project Activities: Project Activity: Develop a watershed-based plan that includes water quality monitoring and existing water/land use data and education and outreach in the form of establishing an advisory committee, hosting public meetings, updating a website, identifying landowners for BMP cost- share projects, localizing need for urban BMPs, and distributing educational materials. Nonpoint Source Management Program, Total Maximum Daily Loads Implementation, Page 20 – Implementation of management practices and activities to address the nonpoint sources of pollution is being conducted through the development of various types of TMDL implementation plans. Task #1: Establish a Watershed Advisory Committee (WAC) to assist in developing and preparing the WMP. Identify and contact government agencies, local organizations, landowners in the area, and others that may be interested in serving on the Watershed Advisory Committee. Deliverables: Copies of meeting announcements, meetings minutes with list of attendees, education and outreach material and other documentation pertaining to WMP development, and WAC membership list. Measures of Success: Completion of at least four (4) meetings attended by at least three (3) Advisory Committee members. Task #2: Convene a minimum of two (2) public meetings to inform the public on the status of the WMP and solicit feedback. These meetings will be readily accessible to the public in terms of time and location. In addition, submit draft versions of the WMP to GAEPD and to the public for comments. Deliverables: Announcement of the meetings to the public and all organizations and partners involved in the WMP. Minutes, sign-in sheets, hand-outs and presentation materials, as appropriate, from the meetings. Description of the watershed condition and concerns, goals and scope of the WMP, and information about the stakeholder participation and expectations to implement the proposed WMP. Measures of Success: Input from participants attending the meeting to identify the most significant issues on-going in the watershed. Detailed list of concerns and suggestions to improve the final WMP. Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 5 Task #3: Conduct a visual stream assessment of the watershed to identify potential sources of pollutants. Deliverables: A report describing any pollutant sources observed during the visual survey. Updated data related to potential sources of pollution to update existing TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans. Measures of Success: Identify a minimum of 4 sites in the visual stream assessment with GPS coordinates, photographs and location descriptions to be utilized for water quality sampling. Task #4: Update and submit to GAEPD a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Fecal Coliform Bacteria and Habitat Evaluation (Sediment). Deliverables: QA/QC Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Fecal Coliform Bacteria and Habitat Evaluation (Sediment). Measures of Success: GAEPD accepts QA/QC Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Fecal Coliform Bacteria and Habitat Evaluation (Sediment). Task #5: Conduct water quality monitoring in selected locations along the watershed to address priority issues and determine pollutant loading “hot spots” following approved QA/QC monitoring protocols. Deliverables: Data entries for pollutants of concern will be submitted to GAEPD in report format. Measures of Success: Data will be collected and analyzed according to the QA/QC plan and protocols. Field and water quality data results will be recorded in existing database, as appropriate and compared to existing records. Task #6: Identify possible data gaps based on current land usage to determine causes and sources of pollutants Deliverables: Completion of updated data (database and maps) on land coverage (urban, forestry, mining and agricultural). This information will be used to update existing records. Measures of Success: 100% completion of interviews/inspections and data gathering to prioritize pollution sources within the watershed and define BMP recommendations. Task #7: Describe BMPs that will need to be implemented to achieve water quality standards and associated estimated costs and financial assistance. Tie BMPs to causes and sources of fecal coliform and sediment determined in Task #6. Identify most cost-effective BMPs to reduce fecal coliform and sediment loadings from most likely sources. Deliverables: Survey of BMPs that best address fecal coliform pollution from stormwater runoff and reduce sediment loadings. A matrix of estimated costs and financial assistance to implement the entire plan to meet the TMDL targets. Measures of Success: Identification of highest impact areas within watershed where BMP implementation would be most effective in achieving target TMDLs in the three HUC-12 watersheds: Butler Creek (Boardmans Pond to Phinizy Ditch (formerly to SR 56)) - Fecal Coliform at 1.07E+12 counts/30 days, 49% load reduction Butler Creek (Phinizy Ditch to Savannah River, Augusta) - Fecal Coliform at 3.45E+13 counts/30 days counts/30 days, 98% load reduction Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 6 Rocky Creek (SR 56 to below New Savannah Road, Augusta) - Fecal coliform at 7.53E+13 counts/30 days, 80% load reduction Reed Creek - Fecal coliform at 9.98E+11 counts/30 days, 75% load reduction Rae’s Creek - Sediment at 61.8 tons/day, 0% load reduction Rocky Creek (Headwaters to SR 56 (formerly to Phinizy Ditch)) - Sediment at 108.4 tons/day, 0% load reduction Rocky Creek (SR 56 to below New Savannah Road, Augusta) - Sediment at 111.6 tons/day, 0% load reduction Task #8: Develop a local watershed coordinator position to facilitate long-term implementation of the entire watershed plan and identify reliable authorities, partners and stakeholders to provide possible sources of funding and/or match. Deliverables: Description of duties and responsibilities of a local watershed coordinator to be reviewed and approved by the WAC and distributed to qualified candidates. A list of organizations (local public and private agencies), authorities, partners and stakeholders and their responsibilities to implement the WMP. A chart describing possible sources of funding and/or match to cover cost of BMPs. Measures of Success: Use of established criteria and tools to recruit a local watershed coordinator and engage partners and stakeholders committed to implementing most effective BMPs within high impact areas of watershed. Task #9: Develop an information/education component that will be used to enhance public understanding of and participation in implementing the plan. Deliverables: Public Education Program to promote the WMP as a tool for action. Public outreach campaigns promoting BMPs that control nonpoint source pollution. Measures of Success: A high percentage (>50%) of the population within the areas of the watershed identified for BMPs will be invited to participate in educational programs that promote management of nonpoint source pollution and demonstrate interest in participating in a BMP installation. Task #10: Develop a schedule for implementing the recommended best management practices that is reasonably expeditious. Deliverables: Short and long term implementation schedule related to BMP installation and education/outreach campaigns. Measures of Success: Correlation of implementation schedule with committed partners (Watershed Advisory Committee). Task #11: Describe the interim, measurable milestones for tracking implementation of best management practices or other control actions. Deliverables: A set of milestones based on water quality goals, pollutant sources, land use area, cost, and time frame to track implementation of each BMP identified in Task #7. Measures of Success: Review milestones at intervals of WMP updates to determine implementation rate or progress of proposed solutions and management practices aimed to improve aquatic habitat and decrease bacteria in the watersheds. Task #12: Develop a set of criteria (environmental, economic, technological and social) to evaluate the effectiveness of efforts being made towards implementing the WMP. Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 7 Deliverable: Comparison matrix that will track historic, current and future trends (environmental, economic, technological and social) and be used to evaluate progress in WMP implementation. Measures of Success: Use of matrix at intervals of WMP updates to determine how effectively WMP is being implemented. Task #13: Develop a long-term water quality monitoring approach to determine whether substantial progress is being made towards attaining water quality standards. Deliverable: Strategy for collecting, recording and reporting historic, current and future water quality data that will be used to determine improvement in biological community and water quality. Measures of Success: Analysis of data from ongoing water quality monitoring at intervals of WMP updates to determine progress toward targeted improvement in IBI and MMI scores and targeted reduction in fecal coliform bacteria loadings: Targeted reduction in fecal coliform loadings as follows: Butler Creek (Boardmans Pond to Phinizy Ditch (formerly to SR 56)) - Fecal Coliform at 1.07E+12 counts/30 days, 49% load reduction Butler Creek (Phinizy Ditch to Savannah River, Augusta) - Fecal Coliform at 3.45E+13 counts/30 days counts/30 days, 98% load reduction Rocky Creek (SR 56 to below New Savannah Road, Augusta) - Fecal coliform at 7.53E+13 counts/30 days, 80% load reduction Reed Creek - Fecal coliform at 9.98E+11 counts/30 days, 75% load reduction Targeted improvement in IBI and MMI scores as follows: Rae’s Creek - Fish IBI Category from Very Poor to Fair Rocky Creek - Fish IBI Category from Very Poor to Fair Rocky Creek - Benthic Macroinvertebrate MMI Category from Very Poor to Fair Task #14: Incorporate data, partner comments from drafts and finalize 9-element WMP. Deliverable: Final version of comprehensive Watershed Management Plan. Measures of Success: Final Watershed Management Plan that meets USEPA’s Nine Elements of Watershed Planning approved by GAEPD and made available for implementation. Project Activity: Reporting Requirements Nonpoint Source Management Program: 319 Grants, Long Term Goal 13, Page 99 – Effectively manage Section 319(h) grant funds. Task #15: Submit Quarterly Reports, including WBGE/MBE reports and invoices. Deliverables: Quarterly deliverables, data, invoices and supporting documentation reporting progress on project and using template provided by GAEPD. Measures of Success: Quarterly deliverables, data, invoices and supporting documentation reviewed and approved by GAEPD. Task #16: Submit Final Invoice and Closeout Report to GAEPD for review. Deliverables: Final Invoice and Closeout Report Measures of Success: Final Invoice and Closeout Report reviewed and approved by GAEPD. Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 8 6. Roles and Responsibilities of Partnering Organizations: Organization Responsibilities Augusta-Richmond County Execute grant contract with GAEPD Project Manager for Tasks 1 – 16 in Scope of Work Render 20% of total project costs as in-kind match Assist with development of Watershed Advisory Committee GA Environmental Protection Division Provide 80% of total project costs Review and approve project deliverables Participate in meetings, as appropriate Review and assist as needed with 319(h) Grant protocols Provide project oversight and contract management Phinizy Center for Water Sciences Sub-contractor to provide technical assistance to Project Manager on Tasks 1 – 16 in Scope of Work Assist with development of Watershed Advisory Committee Conduct Visual Field Survey Finalize QA/QC Water Quality Monitoring Plan Write Watershed Management Plan Assist with promotion of WMP to public The following represents a list of possible stakeholders that will be invited to serve on the Watershed Advisory Committee: Augusta/Richmond County Water Utilities Department Columbia County Water Utilities Central Savannah River Area (CSRA) Regional Commission Planning USDA-NRCS University of Georgia Extension Program County Agents CSRA Land Trust Savannah Riverkeeper Fort Gordon Environmental Services Augusta University Department of Biology 7. Project Location: a) Project Area Description and Map: The project area is located in three HUC-12 sub- watersheds of the Augusta Canal-Savannah River Watershed HUC-10 #0306010606 in the Savannah River Basin. For this project, the focus will target the following HUC-12 areas exclusively within the State of Georgia: Augusta Canal (HUC12# 030601060601), Butler Creek (HUC12# 030601060602), and Beaverdam Ditch (HUC12# 030601060607) b) Watershed(s) or Project Area Size (Acres) State of Georgia Only: 100,658 acres c) County or Counties: Augusta-Richmond, Columbia & Burke Counties Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 9 Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 10 d) Land Uses within the Project Area - Acres (Percentages) Georgia Area Only: Land Use Type Acres Percent Open Water 3775 3.75 Developed, Open Space 16628 16.52 Developed, Low Intensity 23306 23.15 Developed, Medium Intensity 9498 9.44 Developed, High Intensity 4777 4.75 Barren Land 1045 1.04 Deciduous Forest 7262 7.21 Evergreen Forest 6298 6.26 Mixed Forest 1262 1.25 Shrub/Scrub 1996 1.98 Herbaceous 3294 3.27 Hay/Pasture 728 0.72 Cultivated Crops 2183 2.17 Woody Wetlands 16647 16.54 Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands 1959 1.95 Source: National Land Cover Database 2011 (NLCD 2011) produced by Federal Multi- Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium. f. Hydrologic Unit Code(s), Watershed Name(s) and Priority Watershed(s): HUC 12#: 030601060601 Name: Augusta Canal Priority: N HUC 12#: 030601060602 Name: Butler Creek Priority: N HUC 12#: 030601060607 Name: Beaverdam Ditch Priority: N Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 11 Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 12 8. Nonpoint Source Pollution Impairments and Healthy Waters: a) Section 305(b)/303(d) Lists of Waters: Project Stream Name and 303(d) Location Violation Extent/ Counties Listing Status Category Potential Causes Butler Creek Boardmans Pond to Phinizy Ditch (formerly Boardmans Pond to SR56) FC 9 miles/ Richmond 5 NP, UR Butler Creek Phinizy Ditch to Savannah River, Augusta FC 3 miles/ Richmond 4a UR Rae's Creek Headwaters to Cranes Creek Bio F 4 miles/ Richmond 5 UR Reed Creek Rd. S1727 to Bowen Pond near Martinez FC 8 miles/ Columbia 4a UR Rocky Creek Headwaters to SR 56 (formerly Headwaters to Phinizy Ditch) Bio M, Bio F 6 miles/ Richmond 5, 5 NP, UR Rocky Creek SR 56 to below New Savannah Road, Augusta FC, Bio M, Bio F 2 miles/ Richmond 4a, 5, 5 UR Phinizy Ditch Tributary to Butler Creek (Augusta) Supporting 2 miles/ Richmond 1 Healthy Waters Reed Creek Bowen Pond to Savannah River Supporting 1 mile/ Columbia 1 Healthy Waters Savannah River Stevens Creek Dam to US Hwy 78/278 Supporting 9 miles/ Columbia/ Richmond 1 Healthy Waters Secondary Pollutant(s): N/A Other Documented Nonpoint Source Impacts: N/A Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 13 9. Monitoring: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Water Quality Monitoring Plan for Fecal Coliform Bacteria and Habitat Evaluation/ Sediment (TSS) will address the following: a) Monitoring Purpose: Update the most likely sources of fecal coliform and sediment loading or biological habitat impairment within a watershed. Provide data to compare with historical assessments on the Georgia’s Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List of Waters. b) Monitoring Type: Targeted Monitoring for four months required as part of developing the WMP c) Monitoring Pollutant or Indicator of Concern: Biological (i.e. E. coli Bacteria, Fecal Coliform Bacteria) Habitat Evaluation Sediment (TSS) d) Expected Monitoring Design: See Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan for Fecal Coliform Bacteria and Habitat Evaluation/ Sediment (TSS). 10. Project Budget: Item Object Class Category Federal 319(h) Grant Funds Non-Federal Matching Funds Total A Personnel: Description: Augusta-Richmond County FTE $130,650/year x 0.04% x 1 year Purpose: Manage subcontractor, quarterly invoices & reports $0 $5,226 $5,226 B Fringe Benefits: Description: Augusta-Richmond County (Included in Item A) $0 $0 $0 C Travel: NA NA NA D Equipment: (>$5,000 each item) NA NA NA E Supplies: Description: Purpose: Monitoring & Outreach $0 $5,000 $5,000 F Contractual: Phinizy Center for Water Sciences Purpose: Meetings, outreach, field survey, targeted monitoring, DRAFT & Final WMP Development of a Nine-Element Watershed Management Plan 14 Budget Break-Down: Personnel Fringe Travel @ $0.54/mile Supplies $32,567 $2,393 $900 $4,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $40,000 $0 $40,000 G Construction: DOES NOT APPLY N/A N/A N/A H Other: $0 $0 $0 I Total Direct Charges: $40,000 $10,226 $50,226 J Indirect Charges: Description: Certified rate (Certificate) Purpose: Applied to Direct Charges $0 $0 $0 K Total: $40,000 $10,226 $50,226 Disclaimer: Match contributions are from non-federal sources and do not overlap current or future projects funded by either 319(h) or other federal grants. Signature ______________________________________ Date: __________ Organization: Augusta-Richmond County 11. Project Attachments: N/A AUGUSTAs GEORGIA New Grant Proposal/Application Before a DepartmenUagency may apply for the granUaward on behalf of Augusta Richmond County, they must first obtain approval signature from the Adminlstrator and the Finance Director. The Adminlstrator will obtain information on the grant program and requirements from the funding tgency and review these for feasibtlity to determine lf this granUaward wlll benefit Augusta Richmond County. The Finance Director will review the funding requirement to determine if the grant will lit within our budget structure and financial goals. Proposal Project No. Project Title PROOOO86 AED Dev. of 9-Element Watershed Mgmt Plan 319(h) Grant Funds -Development of a Nine-Element Wrterahed Management Plan for the Augusta Canal (HUC-12 #030601060601) / Butler Creek (HUC-t2 #030601060602) / Beaverdam Ditch (HUC- 12 #030601060607) Watersheds in Savannah River Basin Local Match Required: S10,266 (lnkind: $5266 + Cash:$5,000) EEO Required: No Cash Match coming from stormwater services contractual program 58r044320t52-l I 120 Start Date: 04101/2017 End Date: 0313112018 Submit Date: 0211712017 Department: 023 Total Budgeted Amount: 50,226-00 Total Funding Agency: Sponsor: GM0015 US EPA Sponsor Type: F Federal Purpose: I Environmental clean up Contacts Name REGEIVED ADM INISTRATOR'S OFFICE FFB 1 7 2017 AUGUSTA.RICHMOI{D COUNW Engineering Cash Match? Y 40,000.00 Total Cash Match: 10,226.00 Flow Thru lD: GM0020 Dept of Natural Resources PhoneType ID I CtvttOzt Malik, Hameed (706)796-5068 TYPe FA Jy- H. MALIK Approvals Date 02117/2017 Dept. Signature: Grant Coordinator Signature: l.) lhay>reviewed the Grant application and enclosed materials and: g,{ndthe granVaward to be feasible to the needs of Augusta Richmond County o Deny the request S^^nrZ a )^ia,cit\--r cl7 7-( 7 Finance Director Date 2.) I have reviewed the Grant application and enclosed materials and: y'Appror"the Department Agency to move forward with the application o Deny the request Adm L istrator t. lnlrz Date HM08053 - HAMEED MALTK Page CMl0O0_PROPOSAL - GMl000: Grants Management: I Current Dale: 0211712017 Current Time: l5:17:l I N User: Report: AUGUSTAs GEORGIA New Grant ProposaUApplication Before a DepartmenUagency may apply for the granUaward on behalf of Augusta Richmond County, they must lirst obtain approval signature from the Administrator and the Finance Director. The Administrator will obtain information on the grent program and requirements from the funding tgency and review these for feasibiHty to determine if this granUaward will benefit Auguste Richmond County. The Finance Director will review the funding requirement to determine if the grant will fit within our budget structure and financial goals. Proposal Project No. Proiect Title This form will also be used to provide the external auditors with information on all grants for compliance and certification requirements as required by the State and Federal Government. uscr: HM08053 - HAMEED MALIK Page Report: GMI000_PROPOSAL - GMl000: Grants Management:2 Current Date: 021 17 l20l'l Current Time: l5:17:l I Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM 5th Street over the Savannah River-Bridge Repair and Restoration Contract Award - #16-247 Department:Engineering Department:Engineering Caption:Motion to approve award of preliminary engineering phase of Design Consultant Services Agreement to Civil Services, Inc., in the amount of $200,916.27 for the 5th Street Bridge over the Savannah River (Bridge Repair and Restoration), subject to receipt of signed Agreement as requested by AED.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The 5th Street Bridge over Savannah River (Bridge Repair and Restoration) is a project from the “Approved Investment List” of TIA that was approved by voters of the CSRA in July 31, 2012 referendum. The 5th Street Bridge is a Band 2 project that will begin the existing condition assessment process once approved by the City of Augusta, Georgia Commission. Once existing condition assessment is completed, bridge repair/restoration scope and fee will be developed and engineering design will commence accordingly. Analysis:The following firms were evaluated based on qualifications, technical approach, experience, and references in December 2016. The following firms submitted RFQs and were evaluated: 1. Moffat & Nichol 2. Moreland Altobelli & Associates 3. Civil Services 4. Heath & Lineback Engineer 5. JMT 6. Wiss Janney Elstner Assoc Civil Services, Inc. was selected based on the evaluation procedures used for this project. Financial Impact:Funds are available in the TIA project budget Alternatives:1). Approve award of Preliminary Engineering Phase of Design Consultant Contract to Civil Services, Inc. in the amount of $200,916.27 for 5th Street Bridge over the Savanah River (Bridge Repair and Restoration), subject to receipt of signed contract as requested by AED. 2). Do not approve and find alternative to complete the project and meet TIA project completion schedule Cover Memo Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: Project TIA Funds REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo A-1 RFQ Item #16-247 DESIGN AND FIELD ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 5TH STREET BRIDGE OVER THE SAVANNAH RIVER SCOPE OF SERVICES PHASE I – STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT Civil Services, Inc. was retained by the City of Augusta to perform Design and Field Engineering services for the 5th Street Bridge Rehabilitation. I.PURPOSE: The purpose of the project is to perform design and field engineering services for repair and restoration of the 5th Street Bridge (Jefferson Davis Memorial Bridge) over the Savannah River in the City of Augusta. The CSI team will develop a design and construction package for the City of Augusta with sufficient details to repair and restore the existing structurally deficient bridge. II.SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONSULTANT: The Consultant and related Sub-Consultants will perform the following services during the Bridge Assessment Phase: A.Bridge Inspection – CSI Team will perform a 100% hands-on field inspection and verification of conditions of the bridge superstructure and substructure. B.Underwater Inspection – CSI Team will perform a Level I underwater inspection of the seven masonry piers that support the bridge, in accordance with the Association of Dive Contractors International Consensus Standards as well as those proscribed by OSHA 29 CFR part 1910 for Commercial Diving Operations. If marine growth that prevents visual inspection of the piers is encountered, we will perform a Level II inspection of two-to- four locations per pier, depending on the water depth. C.Bridge Load Rating - CSI will perform a load rating of the existing bridge structure. D.Bridge Assessment Report – We will prepare a detailed Bridge Condition Report that includes the methodology used for the inspection, a detailed list of findings, an evaluation and assessment of the condition of the bridge. The report will also include plan and elevation drawings that include locations of significant deficiencies observed. A photo appendix will also be included in the report. III.CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: To provide existing plans and previous Inspection Reports. IV.SUMMARY OF FEES: For a summary of Lump Sum Amount Contract Fees, see attached Fee Proposal. C:\Users\chrism\AppData\Local\Temp\Bluebeam Software50839696.xlsx CITY OF AUGUSTA, GEORGIA Design & Field Engineering Services for 5th Street Bridge By: C. Morse Date:23-Jan-17 Consultant:Civil Services, Inc. Project No.:Project Description:Phase 1 - Structural Assessment Contract No.: Project Manager Sr. Engineer Engineer Sr. Designer Designer Cadd Technician Clerical Total No. / Activity Manhours Salary Avg. Man Hourly Man Hourly Man Hourly Man Hourly Man Hourly Man Hourly Man Hourly by Costs for Hourly Hours Rate Hours Rate Hours Rate Hours Rate Hours Rate Hours Rate Hours Rate Activity Activity Rate 1.Bridge Assessment A. Discipline Management & Coordination 88.0 $190.00 0.0 $175.00 0.0 $110.00 0.0 $80.00 0.0 $75.00 0.0 $65.00 0.0 $65.00 88.0 $16,720.00 $190.00 B. Pre-Inspection Preparation 12.0 $190.00 24.0 $175.00 24.0 $110.00 0.0 $80.00 16.0 $75.00 24.0 $65.00 0.0 $65.00 100.0 $11,880.00 $118.80 C. Top/Deck Inspection 40.0 $190.00 40.0 $175.00 40.0 $110.00 0.0 $80.00 0.0 $75.00 0.0 $65.00 0.0 $65.00 120.0 $19,000.00 $158.33 D. Bridge Load Rating 8.0 $190.00 100.0 $175.00 100.0 $110.00 0.0 $80.00 0.0 $75.00 0.0 $65.00 0.0 $65.00 208.0 $30,020.00 $144.33 E. Asssessment Report Draft 12.0 $190.00 40.0 $175.00 40.0 $110.00 40.0 $80.00 0.0 $75.00 24.0 $65.00 0.0 $65.00 156.0 $18,440.00 $118.21 F. Assessment Report Final 12.0 $190.00 24.0 $175.00 24.0 $110.00 8.0 $80.00 0.0 $75.00 8.0 $65.00 0.0 $65.00 76.0 $10,280.00 $135.26 H. Meetings w/City 24.0 $190.00 24.0 $175.00 0.0 $110.00 0.0 $80.00 0.0 $75.00 0.0 $65.00 0.0 $65.00 48.0 $8,760.00 $182.50 I. QA/QC 16.0 $190.00 0.0 $8.00 0.0 $110.00 0.0 $80.00 0.0 $75.00 0.0 $65.00 0.0 $65.00 16.0 $3,040.00 $190.00 Total Total Salary 212.0 252.0 228.0 48.0 16.0 56.0 0.0 812.0 $118,140.00 $145.49Manhours(MH x HR) TOTAL CONTRACT FEE COMPUTATIONS (Check Appropriate Block) SALARY RELATED COSTS:$118,140.00 Initial Estimate MISCELLANEOUS DIRECT COST:$3,864.77 Initial Estimate No. 1 BRIDGE INSPECTION (Kisinger Campo & Assoc.):$64,411.50 UNDERWATER INSPECTION (Collins Engineers):$14,500.00 Initial Estimate No. _______ TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:$200,916.27 If revised estimate, give reasons for revisions: # By attachment, show details of the amount of percentage for Cost Elements & Additives. SHEET 1 MISCELLANEOUS DIRECT COST CONSULTANT:CIVIL SERVICES, INC.NAME OF PROJECT:5th Street Bridge PREPARED:23-Jan-17 PROJECT NO.:16-247 ITEM DESCRIPTION Travel From: To Project: Per Diem 5 Days x 3 People x $50.00 per diem =$750.00 Comm. Air 0 Trips x 1 People x $500.00 per trip =$0.00 POV 1 Trips x 522 miles x $0.49 per mile =$253.17 Rental 0 Trips x 1 days / trip x $54.00 per day =$0.00 Lodging 5 Nights x 3 People x $150.00 per day =$2,250.00 To City: Per Diem 0 Trips x 1 People x $50.00 per diem x $0.00 Comm. Air 0 Trips x 1 People x $0.00 per trip =$0.00 POV 2 Trips x 20 miles x $0.49 per mile =$19.40 Rental 0 Trips x 1 days / trip x $54.00 per day =$0.00 Lodging 2 Night x 2 People x $150.00 per day =$600.00 Subtotal:$3,872.57 Other (Specify) Display Boards, Color Aerials & Handouts (for Community Awareness Plan)$0.00 Miscellaneous (Courier, FedEx, etc.)$0.00 TOTAL COST $3,872.57 * MAXIMUM $ 0.485 / MILE SHEET 2 Request for Qualifications Request for Qualifications will be received at this office until Wednesday, October 26, 2016 @ 3:00 p.m. for furnishing: RFQ Item #16-247 Design and Field Engineering Services for 5th Street Bridge over the Savannah River for Augusta Engineering Department RFQs will be received by: The Augusta Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams, Director Augusta Procurement Department 535 Telfair Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 RFQ documents may be viewed on the Augusta Georgia web site under the Procurement Department ARCbid. RFQ documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 535 Telfair Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. All questions must be submitted in writing by fax to 706 821-2811 or by email to procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov to the office of the Procurement Department by Friday, October 14, 2016, @ 5:00 P.M. No RFQ will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. No RFQ may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days after bids have been opened, pending the execution of contract with the successful bidder. Request for qualifications (RFQ) and specifications. An RFQ shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the request for qualification including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waivable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. All requests to waive or modify any such material condition shall be submitted through the Procurement Director to the appropriate committee of the Augusta, Georgia Commission for approval by the Augusta, Georgia Commission. Please mark RFQ number on the outside of the envelope. Proponents are cautioned that acquisition of RFQ documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of RFQ documents from unauthorized sources places the proponent at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Correspondence must be submitted via mail, fax or email as follows: Augusta Procurement Department Attn: Geri A. Sams, Director of Procurement 535 Telfair Street, Room 605 Augusta, GA 30901 Fax: 706-821-2811 or Email: procbidandcontract@augustaga.gov GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle September 22, 29 October 6, 13, 2016 Metro Courier September 28, 2016 OFFICIAL Vendors Attachment "B"E-Verify #SAVE Form Addendum # 1 Original 6 Copies Moffatt & Nichol 2 East Bryan St., Suite 501 Savannah, GA 31401 YES 113187 YES YES YES YES Moreland Altobelli & Assoc 2450 Commerce Ave., Suite 100 Duluth, GA 30096 YES 53328 YES YES YES YES Civil Services 851 Laney Walker Blvd Augusta, GA 30901 YES 387871 YES YES YES YES Heath & Lineback Engineer 2390 Canton Rd., Bldg 200 Marietta, GA 30066 YES 64937 YES YES YES YES JMT 952 Houston Northcutt Blvd., Suite 100 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 YES 413974 YES YES YES YES Wiss Janney Elstner Assoc 2915 Premiere Parkway, Suite 100 Duluth, GA 30097 YES 45023 YES YES YES YES RFQ Item #16-247 Design and Field Engineering Services for 5th Street Bridge over the Savannah River for the Augusta, GA - Engineering Department RFQ Date: Friday, November 4, 2016 @ 11:00 a.m. Total Number Specifications Mailed Out: 24 Total Number Specifications Download (Demandstar): 18 Total Electronic Notifications (Demandstar): 407 Total packages submitted: 6 Total Noncompliant: 0 Page 1 of 1 Moffatt & Nichol 2 East Bryan St., Suite 501 Savannah, GA 31401 Moreland Altobelli & Assoc 2450 Commerce Ave Duluth, GA 30096 Civil Services 851 Laney Walker Blvd Augusta, GA 30901 Heath & Lineback Engineer 2390 Canton Rd., Bldg 200 Marietta, GA 30066 JMT 952 Houston Northcutt Blvd., Suite 100 Mount Pleasant, SC 29464 Wiss Janney Elstner Assoc 2915 Premiere Parkway, Suite 100 Duluth, GA 30097 A. Package submitted by the deadline Pass/Fail PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS B. Package is complete (includes requested information as required per this solicitation)Pass/Fail PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS C. Overall Quality of RFP (concise and to-the-point) 50 42.5 43.8 47.0 43.0 43.8 43.8 1. Respondents Experience 100 86.3 93.8 94.5 88.8 95.0 93.8 2. Financial Responsibility 100 91.3 93.8 92.5 90.0 91.3 88.8 3. Project Management 95 82.5 85.0 86.8 85.0 83.8 81.3 4. Key Personnel & Staff 90 77.5 82.5 85.5 83.8 81.3 77.5 5. Organizational Qualifications 85 78.8 81.3 80.0 78.8 81.3 80.0 6. Optional Interview (Potential Bonus Points)10 D. TOTAL 480 416.25 436.25 439.25 426.25 432.5 421.25 1. Specific relevant experience of your company (specific to “complete street” concept and design). 75 67.5 72.5 73.8 68.0 71.3 70.0 2. A detailed description of the proposed technical approach to be taken for the performance of the required services. 100 78.8 81.3 92.5 86.3 77.5 78.8 3. Conceptual project schedule. 25 18.8 20.0 22.5 8.8 13.8 20.0 E. TOTAL 200 165 173.75 188.75 163 162.5 168.75 Within Richmond County 10 10 Within CSRA 8 Within Georgia 6 6 6 6 6 Within SE United States (includes AL, TN, NC, SC, FL) 4 4 All Others 2 TOTAL 10 6 6 10 6 4 6 H. References 10 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Total 750 632.25 662.25 687.5 640.75 645.25 642.25 Evaluation Sheet - RFQ Item #16-247 Design and Field Engineering Services for 5th Street Bridge over the Savannah River for the Augusta, GA - Engineering Department Evaluation Meeting Date: Thursday, December 1, 2016 @ 4:00 p.m. Vendors Total (Total Possible Score 750) Second Round Elimination (Total Points 50) (MUST ACHIEVE 35 POINTS FOR CONTINUED CONSIDERATION) (MUST PASS FOR CONTINUED CONSIDERATION) RANKING - First Round Elimination Proximity to Area (Total Points 10) F. Proximity to Area Scope of Services (Total Points 200) Proposer’s Overall Ability to Provide the Services (Total Points 470) Reference(s) (Total Points 10 Procurement DepartmentRepresentative:______________Nancy Williams________________________________ Evaluator: Cumulative Date: 12/8/16 Procurement Department Completion Date: 12/8/16 Internal Use Only Note: Respondent/Offeror(s) receiving 600 or more points will be invited to do presentations to provide additional information if deemed necessary. Submittal and Quality of RFP D. Narrative E. Scope of Services Quality of RFP Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Abandonment - Alley between Hogan Street and Adrian Street Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to determine that the alley between Hogan Street and Adrian Street, as shown on the attached plat has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public purpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7- 2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities as directed by Augusta Engineering Department and Augusta Utilities Department. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Applegraph Construction has requested that the alley between Hogan Street and Adrian Street be abandoned. The property is no longer a functioning alley and the alley splits their property located at 1103 Hogan Street. The abandonment request has been reviewed by all essential county departments and administrators and approvals were received to proceed with the abandonment request. The plat of said alley between Hogan Street and Adrian Street is attached. Analysis:In addition to the information provided in the above Background section, publication notices will be made for a public hearing to be held, with results to be presented to the Commission. Notice to the property owners located thereon will be made, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2(b) (1). Financial Impact:Cost of publication and advertisement of public hearing. Alternatives:Approve or deny request to determine that the alley between Hogan Street and Adrian Street be abandoned. Cover Memo Recommendation:Approve determination and request for abandonment of the alley between Hogan Street and Adrian Street, with public hearing to be held regarding the issue of abandonment pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies) as allowed by law, and an easement(s) as directed by the Augusta Engineering Department and the Augusta Utilities Department to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities and drainage. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: N/A REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Gordon Highway @ Doug Barnard Mowing & Maintenance & Indemnity Agreement Department:Engineering Department:Engineering Caption:Motion to approve entering into a Mowing and Maintenance and Indemnity Agreement with the Georgia Department of Transportation. Also, obtain a GDOT Permit for Gordon Hwy at Doug Barnard Entryway Landscape Improvements Project as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Currently, there is a proposed project by the Augusta Entryway Landscape Improvements Program to landscape and maintain Gordon Highway at Doug Barnard. This project includes landscape and irrigation on the Gordon Highway selected areas. Landscape materials include sod, flowering shrubs, and ornamental trees. The improvements will enhance the corridor. F or landscaping projects along State Routes, Georgia DOT requires that the local government enter into a mowing and maintenance agreement, irrespective of funding source. Moreover, since the proposed project will include irrigation system, Georgia DOT requires an indemnity agreement to be executed as well . Analysis:Agreement would allow the Landscape Median Improvements project to move forward. Financial Impact:None anticipated. Alternatives:1). Approve entering into a Mowing and Maintenance and Indemnity Agreement with the Georgia Department of Transportation. Also, obtain a GDOT Permit for Gordon Hwy at Doug Barnard Entryway Landscape Improvements Project as requested by AED. 2). Do not approve. Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One. Cover Memo Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: N/A REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Rev: June 1, 2015 RIGHT OF WAY MOWING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT By and Between THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND Augusta-Richmond County Permit # 01-2017-003-245, Tracking # 272259 SR 10, Milepoint 15.35 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this _____ day of _____________, 20____ by and between the DEPARTMENT of Transportation, an agency of the State of Georgia, hereinafter alternately referred to as “DEPARTMENT” or “LICENSOR”, and the Augusta- Richmond County hereinafter referred to as “LICENSEE”. WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT desires to enter into a public/private partnership to perform certain services relating to mowing and maintenance within DEPARTMENT’S right of way, hereinafter called the “PROJECT”, and WHEREAS, the LICENSEE has represented to the DEPARTMENT that, if such permission is granted to the LICENSEE, LICENSEE shall bear all costs and liability associated with the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the LICENSEE has represented to the DEPARTMENT that they are qualified and experienced to provide such services and the DEPARTMENT has relied upon such representations; Please do not process this document. Once approved by Commission , three originals will be forwarded for execution. Thanks / ext 5070 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants as herein contained, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto that: ARTICLE I SCOPE OF PROJECT The DEPARTMENT shall permit the LICENSEE to perform or cause to be performed, the PROJECT consisting of certain services related to maintaining an identified section of the DEPARTMENT’S rights of way. This permission shall be granted by the means of this Agreement for the entire scope of the PROJECT, as set forth herein. The maintenance duties and responsibilities of the LICENSEE are defined and set forth in Article XI – MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN of this Agreement, and further enumerated and described in Exhibit ‘A’ – Application and Permit for Special Encroachment with approved drawings or final working drawings for a Department-approved construction PROJECT. Exhibit ‘A’ is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set out herein. The PROJECT location shall be defined or delineated as part of Exhibit ‘A’. The required Special Encroachment Permit and/or the construction PROJECT final working drawings are to be approved or issued by the DEPARTMENT. Should the LICENSEE desire that these maintenance services be performed by a third party, LICENSEE and the third party shall enter into subsequent agreement, whereby the LICENSEE shall assume all responsibility of repayment to the third party for those services to be rendered as set forth in Article XI - MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN. The Agreement between LICENSEE and any third parties to this Agreement, shall meet all operational and administrative requirements, including the provisions of liability insurance, set forth by the DEPARTMENT, and all liability associated with the PROJECT shall be borne by LICENSEE and any third parties, as set forth in Article VIII, herein. ARTICLE II EXECUTION OF CONTRACT AND AUTHORIZATION TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence in this agreement. The LICENSEE shall execute this Agreement and return it to the DEPARTMENT within thirty (30) days after receipt of contract forms from the DEPARTMENT. The LICENSEE shall begin work on the PROJECT under this Agreement immediately after receiving a signed and executed copy of the Agreement (unless noted otherwise in Exhibit A or upon PROJECT construction completion). Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, and upon execution of this Agreement, the DEPARTMENT grants the right to the LICENSEE to mow, edge, and maintain, as set forth in Article XI- MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN, that specific section of right-of-way identified in this Agreement, and herein defined as the PROJECT. The duration of this Agreement shall be for fifty years from the date above first written unless terminated sooner by the DEPARTMENT or LICENSEE. ARTICLE III SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES If, prior to the satisfactory completion of the services under this Agreement, any party materially alters the scope, character or complexity of the services from those required under the Agreement, a Supplemental Agreement shall be executed between the parties. It is understood, however, that LICENSEE shall not engage in any activities or conduct any work which would be considered to be outside the scope of the permission granted to LICENSEE by the DEPARTMENT. Minor changes in the work which do not involve increased compensation, extensions of time or changes in the goals and objectives of the work may be made by written notification of such change by any party with written approval by the other parties. ARTICLE IV ASSIGNMENT It is understood by the LICENSEE that the work is considered personal and, except as provided for in Article I, LICENSEE agrees not to assign, sublet or transfer any or all of their interest in this Agreement without prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. ARTICLE V CONTRACT DISPUTES This Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed in __Fulton__County, Georgia, without reference to its choice of law doctrine, and all questions of interpretation and construction shall be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia. Any litigation arising out of this contract shall be commenced within the State of Georgia. The foregoing provisions shall not be construed as waiving any immunity to suit or liability, including without limitation, sovereign immunity which may be available to the Department. ARTICLE VI INSURANCE Prior to beginning work, the LICENSEE shall obtain and certify to the DEPARTMENT that it has the following minimum amounts of insurance coverage: (a) Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia. (b) Public Liability Insurance in an amount of not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) for injuries, including those resulting in death to any one person, and in an amount of not less than three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) on an account of any one occurrence, or proof of self insurance. (c) Property Damage Insurance in an amount of not less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) from damages on account of any occurrence, with an aggregate limit of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or proof of self insurance. (d) Valuable Papers Insurance in an amount sufficient to assure the restoration of any plans, drawings, field notes, or other similar data relating to the work covered by the PROJECT. (e) Insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect during the life of the PROJECT. The LICENSEE shall furnish upon request to the DEPARTMENT, certificates of insurance evidencing such coverage. These certificates shall also provide that the insurance will not be modified or canceled without a 30 day prior written notice to the DEPARTMENT. Failure by the LICENSEE to procure and maintain the insurance as set forth above shall be considered a default and cause for termination of this Agreement and forfeiture of the Performance and Payment Bonds. The LICENSEE shall, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration date or dates of expiring policies, deposit certified copies of renewal, or new policies, or other acceptable evidence of insurance with the DEPARTMENT. ARTICLE VII COMPENSATION It is agreed that LICENSEE shall conduct all work at no cost to the DEPARTMENT, and without compensation from the DEPARTMENT. It is further agreed that any and all issues relating to compensation and payment shall be resolved by and between LICENSEE and any successors, subcontractors, or assigns thereto. The DEPARTMENT and LICENSEE further agree that, should the DEPARTMENT be required to conduct any inspections and/or supervision of the PROJECT beyond that which would normally occur in the ordinary course of the DEPARTMENT’S maintenance activities, LICENSEE shall reimburse the DEPARTMENT for such inspection and supervision. The rate of reimbursement for the DEPARTMENT’S inspection and supervision shall in no case exceed a rate determined to be reasonable by the parties. Should LICENSEE and the DEPARTMENT desire to change this agreement at a later date to provide for compensation to LICENSEE, or any successors or assigns thereto, such change shall only be permitted by a supplemental agreement as set forth in Article III herein. Any supplemental agreements involving compensation shall be subject to the DEPARTMENT review and approval. ARTICLE VIII RESPONSIBILITY FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITY LICENSEE NOT AGENT OF DEPARTMENT LICENSEE, and all successors and assigns thereto, shall save harmless the DEPARTMENT, its officers, agents, and employees from all suits, claims, actions or damages of any nature whatsoever resulting from the performance of work assigned to LICENSEE under this Agreement. LICENSEE further agrees that they shall be fully responsible for injury or damage to landscaping, landscape related items, and any other non-standard and decorative elements installed by or for the LICENSEE within the right of way, and for any damage to the DEPARTMENT’S signs, structures, or roadway fixtures, if LICENSEE causes the damage. These indemnities shall not be limited by reason of the listing of any insurance coverage. It is further understood and agreed that LICENSEE, or any successor or assigns thereto, in the conduct of any work involved in the PROJECT, shall not be considered the agent of the DEPARTMENT or of the State of Georgia. ARTICLE IX TERMINATION OF CONTRACT The DEPARTMENT may terminate this contract for just cause at any time by giving of thirty (30) days written notice of such termination. Upon receipt of such notice of termination, LICENSEE shall discontinue and cause all work under this contract to terminate upon the date specified in the said notice. In the event of such termination, the DEPARTMENT shall be paid for any amounts as may be due it as specified in Article VII up to and including the specified date of termination. LICENSEE shall have the right to terminate this contract at any time, provided that such termination is first approved by the DEPARTMENT, and that the DEPARTMENT is reimbursed in full for all services rendered pursuant to Article VII. The DEPARTMENT and LICENSEE further agree that, should the DEPARTMENT allow the LICENSEE to terminate the agreement, the termination, unless determined otherwise in writing by the DEPARTMENT, shall be contingent upon the following: A. The LICENSEE, at the discretion of the DEPARTMENT, removing the planted landscaping, landscape related items, and any other non-standard and decorative elements that were installed by or for the LICENSEE at no cost to the DEPARTMENT. B. The LICENSEE restoring the removed landscape areas to their original condition or a condition that meets federal standards and is acceptable to the DEPARTMENT. C. The LICENSEE restoring the removed non-standard and decorative elements with standard DEPARTMENT elements that meet federal and state requirements. D.The LICENSEE reimbursing the DEPARTMENT in full any state and/or federal funds used to purchase and install the landscaping, landscape related items, and other non- standard and decorative elements that are no longer to be maintained by the LICENSEE. The DEPARTMENT and the LICENSEE agree that, should the LICENSEE fail to perform the maintenance, as set forth in Article XI - MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN, the DEPARTMENT may require the LICENSEE to remove, restore, and reimburse according to items “A”, “B”, “C”, and “D” above, as applicable, and then terminate the agreement. ARTICLE X COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW The undersigned certify that: A. This Agreement is subject to applicable state and federal laws, standards, and rules and regulations. B. The provisions of Sections 45-10-20 through 45-10-28 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated relating to Conflict of Interest and State Employees and Officials Trading with the State have been complied with in full. C. The provisions of Section 50-24-1 through 50-24-6 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to the “Drug-Free Workplace Act” have been complied with in full. ARTICLE XI MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN The covenants herein contained shall, except as otherwise provided, accrue to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have hereunto set their hand and affixed their seals the day and year above first written. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ______________________________________ Commissioner or designee ATTEST: ______________________________________ Angela Whitworth Treasurer LICENSEE: _______________________________________ Sworn to before me this _______day of _________________, 20____. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires _____________, ______. Augusta Entryway Landscape Improvements Program - Gordon Highway at Doug Barnard Landscape Improvements Mowing and Maintenance Agreement and Indemnity Agreement Mayor Hardie Davis, Jr. EXHIBIT ‘A’ (Attach the Application and Permit for Special Encroachment with approved drawings or the final working drawings for a Department-approved construction) G001 BEAUTY SPOT COVER SHEET G002 INDEX PLAN L101 BEAUTY SPOT LANDSCAPE PLAN L201 MISCELLANEOUS NOTES AND DETAILS L202 E.S.P.C. NOTES AND DETAILS I101 BEAUTY SPOT IRRIGATION PLAN I102 BEAUTY SPOT IRRIGATION DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS I103 BEAUTY SPOT IRRIGATION CALSENSE DETAILS I104 BEAUTY SPOT IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS SSOCIATES,A&ASCHOBERLOHNSON,J P.C. 260 W. COLEMAN BLVD WEBSITE: www.theJLAgroup.com PARCEL NO.:N/A TOTAL AREA: 0.69 ACRES G.M.D.:87 GSWCC REGION: 26 SITE INFORMATION: LAND USE - N/A CONSTRUCTION TYPE: LANDSCAPING PROPERTY COORDINATES: 1 : DISTURBED AREA: 0.69 ACRES PROJECT LOCATION MAP E.S.P.C. NOTES: PROJECT DATA INDEX OF DRAWINGS SITE LEGEND Gordon Highway at Doug Barnard Parkway Augusta, Georgia 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=2000' 2000'4000'1000'2000' FRENCH DRAIN MH SS SD 100 + 100.00 PROPOSED G OH T JB SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN GAS OVERHEAD POWER TELEPHONE DITCH/SWALE FENCE (TYPE) CLEAN-OUT/SS SERVICE C.O. + FD BLDG. STRUCTURE UGPUNDERGROUND POWER CCABLE WWATER TREE LINE PROPERTY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY BEARING/LENGTH DIST./RADIUS 1.THIS PROJECT DOES NOT LIE WITHIN THE ZONE AE (100-YR FLOOD PLAIN) PER FIRM NO. 13245C0135G PANEL 0135G DATED JULY 18, 2011 AND FIRM No. 13245C0130G PANEL 0130G DATED JULY 18, 2011. 2.THERE ARE NO STATE WATERS PRESENT WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROJECT LIMITS. 3.WETLANDS ARE NOT PRESENT ONSITE OR WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROJECT LIMITS. 4.NON-EXEMPT ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT BE CONDUCTED WITHIN THE 25 OR 50-FOOT UNDISTURBED STREAM BUFFERS AS MEASURED FROM THE POINT OF WRESTED VEGETATION WITHOUT FIRST ACQUIRING THE NECESSARY VARIANCES AND PERMITS. 5.ALL CRITICAL AREAS SUCH AS STREAM CROSSING S, WETLANDS, CEMETERIES, ETC. ARE NOTED IN THE PLANS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMIT. 6.EROSION AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE DISTURBED AREA. 7."THE ESCAPE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE PREVENTED BY THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES PRIOR TO, OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES". 8."EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. IF FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPROVED PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO CONTROL OR TREAT SEDIMENT SOURCE". 9."ANY DISTURBED AREA LEFT EXPOSED FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN 14 DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH MULCH OR TEMPORARY SEEDING". 10.THERE ARE NO ENDANGERED SPECIES AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES ON OR WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROJECT AREA. 11.THIS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY DOES NOT DISCHARGE TO AND IS NOT WITHIN 1 LINEAR MILE OF AN IMPAIRED STREAM SEGMENT PER 2008 INTEGRATED 305(b)/303(d) LIST OF STREAMS PAGE A-105. 12.DEVELOPERS AND/OR CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE OR CLEAN OUT ANY SILT, DIRT, MUD OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF DEBRIS THAT COMES OFF THEIR SITE AND FINDS ITS WAY INTO A PRIVATE POND OR A COUNTY OWNED POND. THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE ANY OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED ITEMS THAT COME OFF THEIR SITE ONTO PRIVATE OR COUNTY OWNED PROPERTIES TO INCLUDE RIGHTS OF WAY. 13.THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHO PREPARED E.S. & P.C. PLAN SHALL INSPECT THE INSTALLATION OF THE INITIAL SEDIMENT STORAGE REQUIREMENTS AND PERIMETER CONTROL BMP'S WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION. 14.AMENDMENTS/REVISIONS TO THE EROSION, SEDIMENTATION & POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN WHICH HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON BMP'S WITH A HYDRAULIC COMPONENT MUST BE CERTIFIED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 15.WASTE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED TO WATERS OF THE STATE, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY A SECTION 404 PERMIT. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE "GEORGIA MANUAL FOR ON-SITE SEWAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS" FOR WASTE DISPOSAL, SANITARY SEWER AND/OR SEPTIC TANK INCLUDING ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 17.FINAL GRADING WILL CONSIST OF SPREADING TOPSOIL (4" MIN. TO FINISHED GRADES INDICATED) ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT PAVED. 18.ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE GRASSED AND STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING ACCORDING TO THE GRASSING, FERTILIZATION AND MULCH SPECIFICATION. STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED ON DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 14 DAYS OF CESSATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT AREA, OR WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT RESUME WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OR WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. FORCE MAIN FM R E M A R K (GEORGIA - 1-800-282-7411) THREE WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG Architects Engineers Landscape Architects SCH. 40 PVC 4" CONDUIT STUB MT. PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA 1296 BROAD STREET AUGUSTA, GEORGIA G001 NO SCALE STATE ROUTE NUMBER:S.R. 10 GDOT MILEPOST: MILE 15.33-15.40 POSTED SPEED:45 MPH GDOT DISTRICT:DISTRICT 2 COUNTY:RICHMOND GEORGIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATION NUMBER ISSUED:EXPIRES: 0000057484 ZACHARY K. DAVIS .GXGN++%GTVKHKGF&GUKIP2TQHGUUKQPCN Gateway Beauty Spot OWNER: AUGUSTA, GEORGIA 535 Telfair St. | Augusta, GA 30901 OWNER'S CONTACT: HAMEED MALIK, Ph D, PE (706) 796-5068 hmalik@augustaga.gov 24-HOUR CONTACT PERSON: LANCE CHEELY, PLA, LEED AP TEL.: 706-724-5756 COUNTY: RICHMOND UTILITY OWNER: AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY 535 Telfair St. | Augusta, GA 30901 BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ G 0 0 1 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 7 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 3 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects x MT. PLEASANT, SCAUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2016 LF C C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C C 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C G002 1"=50' INDEX PLAN TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ G 0 0 2 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 7 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 3 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects x MT. PLEASANT, SCAUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2016 LF C C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C C 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PER GDOT REQUIREMENTS. THIS INCLUDES ALL ADVANCED WARNING SIGNAGE AND CHANNELIZATION DEVICES TO COMPLY WITH ALL REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE USDOT MANUAL FOR UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 2009 OR MOST RECENT EDITION. COST OF TRAFFIC CONTROL MUST BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. CONTRACTOR WILL IDENTIFY THE TOTAL COST OF TRAFFIC CONTROL AND INDICATE AS AN ATTACHMENT TO BID FORM. UTILITY NOTES: 1.ALL UTILITIES RELOCATED AND/OR NEWLY INSTALLED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY ACCOMMODATION POLICY AND STANDARDS MANUAL 2016 EDITION (UAM). 2.ALL UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND NEW INSTALLATIONS ON THE STATE ROUTE R/W MUST BE PERMITTED THROUGH THE GEORGIA UTILITIES PERMITTING SYSTEM (GUPS). 3.ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.UTILITY OWNERS: SANITARY SEWER- AUGUSTA UTILITY DEPARTMENT STORM SEWER- AUGUSTA UTILITY DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL WATER- AUGUSTA UTILITY DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS- AUGUSTA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING OVERHEAD POWER- GEORGIA POWER TRAFFIC SIGNAL NOTES: 1.THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND ALL OF THE SIGNAL EQUIPMENT (LOOPS, PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS, ETC.) SHALL REMAIN OPERATIONAL AT ALL TIMES DURING THE LANDSCAPING OF THE PROPOSED SITE. SHOULD ANY TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT (LOOPS, PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS, ETC.) BE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THEY WILL HAVE TO BE PUT BACK IN KIND BY THE CONTRACTOR. PLEASE CONTACT AT LEAST 24 HOURS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK SO THAT THEY CAN MEET WITH YOU ON SITE CONCERNING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION (GEORGIA - 1-800-282-7411) THREE WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG L101 1"=20' BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ L 1 0 1 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 7 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 3 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects x MT. PLEASANT, SCAUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2016 LF C C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C C 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C COUNT SYMBOL SIZE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME HEIGHT SPACING 9 Mx 4" CAL.Magnolia x soulingiana 'Lennei'Lennei Saucer Magnolia 15'-17'AS SHOWN 12 Ix'N'B&B Ilex x 'Nellie R. Stevens'Nellie Stevens Holly 12'-16'10' O.C. 15 Cf'A'7 GAL Calycanthus floridus 'Athens'Carolina Allspice FULL 5' O.C. 88 Gj 3 GAL Gardenia jasminoides 'August Beauty'August Beauty Gardenia FULL 6' O.C. 72 Ag'P'3 GAL Abelia grandiflora 'Prostrata'Prostrate White Abelia FULL 3' O.C. 114 R'FC'3 GAL Rosa 'x 'NOA250092' P.P. #16,276 Pink Supreme Flower Carpet Rose FULL 3' O.C. 132 Hx'H'1 GAL Hemerocallis x 'Stella d'Oro'Stella d'Oro Daylily FULL 18" O.C. LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANT SCHEDULE (GEORGIA - 1-800-282-7411) THREE WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG GEORGIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATION NUMBER ISSUED:EXPIRES: 0000057484 ZACHARY K. DAVIS .GXGN++%GTVKHKGF&GUKIP2TQHGUUKQPCN 20 Dv 3 GAL Distylium 'Vintage Jade'Vintage Jade Distylium FULL 4' O.C. DESCRIPTION LENGTH (IN LF) SR 10 NEAREST INTERSECTION WEST 5100 3800 8000 4300 TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH E/W 500 PROJECT PROXIMITY TABLE TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH N/S 400 SR 10 NEAREST INTERSECTION EAST NEAREST INTERSECTION SOUTH NEAREST INTERSECTION NORTH NAME SR10/OLD SAVANNAH ROAD SR10/SKYVIEW DRIVE DOUG BARNARD /DAN BOWLES ROAD MOLLY POND/OLD SAVANNAH N/A N/A PLANTING NOTES: VANDALISM. (1) YEAR. WARRANTY DOES NOT INCLUDE ACTS OF GOD OR 15. ALL PLANTS AND GRASS SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE 13. HIS/HER WORK. ALL CONTAINERS, PALLETS, DEBRIS, ETC. RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEAN UP OF 12. NOT ENCOURAGE SATURATED ROOT SYSTEMS. SUPPLEMENT ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHOULD HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AND 11. AND SHAPE AS ILLUSTRATED ON PLANS. AND CONTINUOUS AND BE WITHIN A REASONABLE LOCATION UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. BEDLINES SHALL BE SMOOTH WHERE MULCH MEETS GRASS, CONCRETE WALKS OR CURBS BEDLINES SHALL HAVE A 3" DEEP SHOVEL CUT TRENCH EDGE10. MIXTURE AS PER THE INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE, LIME, TOPSOIL AND PLANTING THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FERTILIZER,9. INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER DETAILS AND THE8. APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING. ON PLANS. SUBSTITUTIONS DUE TO AVAILABILITY MUST BE DAMAGED, DISEASED OR INADEQUATE IN SIZE AS SPECIFIED EQUAL. NO PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT IS APPROVAL BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR STAKED AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR PRIOR TO PLANTING, THE LOCATION OF TREES SHALL BE7. MOVED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. MATERIAL MADE OF SYNTHETIC OR PLASTICS SHALL BE RE- ACCEPTED IF IT IS ROOT BOUND. ALL ROOT WRAPPING GROWN AS SPECIFIED. NO CONTAINER GROWN STOCK WILL BE ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND WRAPPED OR CONTAINER6. GRADE AS THE PLANT'S ORIGINAL GRADE BEFORE DIGGING. ALL PLANTS SHALL BEAR THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED5. BE PUT INTO THE GROUND BEFORE FINE GRADING IS COMPLETE. APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. NO PLANT SHALL ALL LANDSCAPE AND LAWN AREAS SHALL BE FINE GRADED AS4. PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, ALL MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED3. PLANTING SHOWN ON ALL DRAWINGS. MATERIAL IN QUANTITIES SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL PLANT2. THE EXISTENCE OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY1. NO PLANT WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT DOES NOT MEET THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS OR THESE STANDARDS. THESE AREAS WITH SUITABLE TOPSOIL IF NEEDED TO PROVIDE MINIMUM SLOPE ON LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE 2%. SUITABLE TOP SOIL IS UNAVAILABLE. POSITIVE DRAINAGE AND IF AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF ON-SITE 14. PLACE 3" MIN.-4" MAX. OF MULCH OVER ALL PLANTING BEDS; DARK BROWN DOUBLE HAMMERED HARDWOOD MULCH FOR ALL TREES, SHRUBS, AND GROUND COVERS. PLACE MULCH UNDER PLANTS AND INTO BEDLINE TRENCHES. DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE HAND WATERED THOROUGHLY TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24-HOUR PERIOD AFTER PLANTING. ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND GRASS SHALL THEN BE WATERED WEEKLY OR AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE INCH OF ABSORBED WATER PER WEEK. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FULL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE THROUGH A 30-DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD FOLLOWING THE DATE OF FINAL COMPLETION. AT COMPLETION OF THE 30-DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD THE OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MAINTENANCE AND WATERING. SUITABLE IMPORTED TOPSOIL NOT TO SCALE SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 1. 3. 2. PLAN. TRIANGULAR ON PLANTINGUNLESS NOTEDSPACING -TYP. INSTRUCTIONS. FILL IN PLANTING BED WITH TRIANGULAR SPACING. ADJUST AS PER L.A.'S SPACED AS PER PLAN. TYPICAL BED LAYOUT: LAY OUT PERIMETER PLANTING UNDISTURBED EXISTING SOIL PLANTING SOIL MIX PER PLANTING NOTES 3" DARK BROWN DOUBLE HAMMERED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH THROUGHOUT BED. DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARES. ROOTBALL TO REST ON COMPACTED EXISTING SUBSOIL TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT 1'-0" MIN NOTES: 1)VERIFY FINISH GRADE ELEVATION. PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL AT FINISH GRADE. 2)REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 13 OF BALL. REMOVE CONTAINER PLANTS FROM CONTAINERS AND CUT ANY CIRCLING ROOTS. SOD INSTALLATION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE HYBRID BERMUDA SOD THOROUGHLY WET TOP SOIL IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO SOD TOP OF CURB, SIDEWALK OR OTHER HARDSCAPE, TYP. INSTALLATION. ROLL SOD. TOP DRESS AS REQUIRED. ALLOW 1" FOR PLACEMENT OF SOD WHEN FINE GRADING 3" SHOVEL CUT BED EDGE 4% MIN. MISC. NOTES AND DETAILS NO SCALE (3) 1"X2"X18" LONG WOOD STAKES WITH CENTERED 3/8" DIAM. HOLE IN COMPACTED SOIL. NYLON TREE STRAP,TYP. DO NOT OVERTIGHTEN. NO WIRE SHALL BE ALLOWED. 2" MIN.-4" MAX DEPTH DOUBLE HAMMERED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE. NOTES: 1. MIN. ROOT MASS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH "AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK" 2.PRUNE ALL DAMAGED, DISEASED OR WEAK LIMBS & ROOTS. 3. DO NOT ALLOW ROOT BALL TO DRY OUT DURING INSTALLATION PROCESS. 4. ALL STRAPS, STAKES AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED BY CONTRACTOR WITHIN ONE WEEK OF THE END OF THE 90 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD. DIAMETER OF HOLE AT BOTTOM SHALL BE 1'-0" BEYOND DIA. OF ROOTBALL TOP OF ROOTBALL SHALL BE PLACED 1"-2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL. GRADE TO SLOPE AWAY FROM BASE OF TREE BURLAP TO BE PULLED DOWN ROOTBALL APPROX. 1/3 BALL HEIGHT. REMOVE WIRE BASKET COMPLETELY. NO SCALE TYP. TREE PLANTING DETAIL SLOPE SLOPE NOTE: TREES TO BE WATERED THOROUGHLY AFTER PLANTING. 2" HIGH EARTHERN SAUCER FROM NATIVE SOIL UNDISTURBED FLAT BOTTOM 16.MEDIAN SHALL BE TREATED WITH ROUND-UP OR EQUAL HERBICIDE SPRAY, BY A LICENSED HERBICIDE APPLICATOR AND LEFT UNDISTURBED FOR SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION. THERE SHALL BE NO WEEDS OR GRASS CLUMPS IN EXCAVATED MEDIAN PRIOR TO TOPSOIL PLACEMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO SCHEDULE A TIME FOR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO OBSERVE FINISHED EXCAVATION BEFORE PLACEMENT OF PLANTING SOIL. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SUBMITTAL OF THE TOPSOIL MATERIAL IN A ONE GALLON RESEALABLE PLASTIC STORAGE BAG TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROVIDE A SOIL TEST BY AN APPROVED TESTING AGENCY OF THE PROPOSED MATERIAL FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. L201 NTS 1. A MIXTURE OF APPROVED TOPSOIL, SAND, AND ORGANIC MATERIAL MIXED TO MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION. 2. PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ACCORDING TO U.S.D.A. PARTICLE CLASSIFICATIONS: PARTICLE SIZE (MM) ALLOWABLE LIMIT GRAVEL >4.75 MAX. 3% FINE GRAVEL 2.00-4.75 MAX. 10% VERY COARSE SAND 1.00-2.00 COARSE SAND+ 0.50-1.00 COMBINED MEDIUM SAND 0.25-0.50 50-75% FINE SAND 0.1-0.25 5-15% VERY FINE SAND 0.05-0.10 0-10% SILT 0.002-0.05 10-20% CLAY <0.002 10-20% 3. THE U.S.D.A. SOIL TEXTURE CLASS SHALL BE A SANDY LOAM, WITH NO MORE THAN 75% SAND AND NO MORE THAN 15% COMBINED SILT+CLAY. 4. THE ORGANIC MATTER SHALL BE 8 TO 15%. 5. DEPTH OF MIX AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. 4' THICK DARK BROWN DOUBLE HAMMERED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH REALIGNED SWALE TREES PLANTED AT TOP OF SLOPE. SEE PLANTING PLAN. PROVIDE SOD 12" VERTICALLY FROM BOTTOM OF SWALE. SWALE SECTION DETAIL NO SCALE BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ L 2 0 1 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 7 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 3 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects x MT. PLEASANT, SCAUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2016 LF C C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C C 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C MIN. ROOT MASS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH "AMERICAN STANDARDS NO SCALE PRUNE ALL DAMAGED, DISEASED OR WEAK LIMBS & ROOTS. DO NOT ALLOW ROOT BALL TO DRY OUT DURING INSTALLATION PROCESS. SHRUB ON SLOPE DETAIL 1. 2. 3. FOR NURSERY STOCK" AFTER PLANTING. WATERED THOUROUGHLY NOTE: SHRUBS TO BE NOTES: (USE TOPSOIL) AND SOIL TYPE AT LINE OR BELOW ORIG. GRADE FIRMLY COMPACTED SAUCER ANGLE OF REPOSE VARIES WITH STEEPNESS OF SLOPE GENTLY COMPACTED TOPSOIL MIXTURE PEDESTAL TO BE TAMPED AND TREE PLACED ON LEVEL SURFACE CORNER OF ROOT SYSTEM TO BE SHRUB TRUNK SHOULD BE CENTERED AT INTERSECTION OF CUT AND FILL ROOTBALL APROX. 1/3 BALL HEIGHT BURLAP TO BE PULLED DOWN EXISTING SOIL PROFILE 3" DOUBLE HAMMERED HARDWOOD MULCH. DO NOT COVER ROOT FLARE. 12 " SEE PLANTING PLAN FOR PLANT MATERIAL. ROADWAY CLR. ZONE. (24' FROM EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY) IRRIGATION CONTROLLER PEDESTAL BACK OF CURB WIDTH VARIES MEDIAN PLANT SPACING DETAIL NO SCALE SOD AREA PER PLAN 2'-0" 12" SEE TREE AND/OR SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING BED BERM DETAIL PAVING NO SCALE 4% MIN.4% MIN. 3'-0" UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SLOPE AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN MIN. REQ. SLOPE IN MEDIAN ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF DRAIN 8"-10" MIN. BERM HEIGHT @ 5' FROM BACK OF CURB IN PLANTING BEDS EXISTING GRADE. REMOVE 3" TYP. AT CURB 8"-10" MIN. BERM HEIGHT AT 5' FROM BACK OF CURB IN FLOWER BEDS NO SHRUB SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ITS ROOT ZONE LESS THAN 3" ABOVE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OR DEEPER THAN 2" BELOW BACK OF CURB. ALL SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL A MINIMUM OF 1" ABOVE GRADE. MULCH SHALL BE LAID OVER EDGES OF ROOT BALL BUT SHALL NOT COVER ROOT FLARE. COARSE SAND UP TO 1" BELOW CURB HEIGHT TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE.2% MIN.6" M I N . 2% MIN.2% MIN. NO PLANT SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 5' OF THE BASE OF A TREE TRIANGULAR SPACING OF SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS AS SPECIFIED IN PLANT SCHEDULE. CENTER OF ROOT BALL SHALL BE CLR. FROM BED EDGE MIN. 2'-0" FOR SHRUBS AND 1'-0" FOR GROUND COVERS. ALL PLANT MATERIAL, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TURF GRASS, SHOULD BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 3' FROM BACK OF CURB . SHOVEL CUT SOD EDGE TYP. SEE NOTE #10 THIS SHEET. NOTES: 1. THIS DETAIL SHALL APPLY TO ALL LANDSCAPED BEDS. WHERE NOT BOUND BY CURB AND GUTTER, LET THE FINISHED GRADE AT THE PROPOSED BEDLINE GOVERN PLANTING DEPTHS AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION DEPTHS. L202 NTS 9. 8. RECOMMENCEMENT. LAID BARE FOR MORE THAN 180 DAYS PRIOR TO CONST. Ds2 & Ds3 SHALL BE EMPLOYED FOR DISTURBED AREAS 180 DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENCEMENT. BARE FOR MORE THAN 45 DAYS AND NO GREATER THAN Ds1 & Ds2 WILL BE EMPLOYED FOR DISTURBED AREAS LAID PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENCEMENT. FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS AND NO GREATER THAN 45 DAYS Ds1 WILL BE EMPLOYED FOR DISTURBED AREAS LAID BARE7. NOTES: NO SCALE 6. 5. 4. 4 TO 6 INCHES OF TOP GROWTH. BERMUDA GRASS MAY BE MOWED AS DESIRED MAINTAINING AT LEAST PERMANENT GRASSING SHALL BE IRRIGATED AND MAINTAINED. SPECIES PLANTED ALONE OR IN MIXTURES WITH OTHER SPECIES. TOPDRESSING WILL BE APPLIED ON ALL TEMPORARY & PERMANENT RUNOFF. IRRIGATION WILL BE APPLIED AT A RATE THAT WILL NOT CAUSE 3. 2. 1. BEGIN AT EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE. DICATED. IN ANY CASE, GRASSING OF ANY DISTURBED AREA WILL OF EACH PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION OR IN THE SEQUENCE AS IN- GRASSING OF DISTURBED AREAS WILL COMMENCE AT COMPLETION GRASSING IS OBTAINED AND WEEDS ARE NOT DOMINANT. GRASSING WILL BE ACCEPTED WHEN A 95% COVER BY PERMANENT USE OF A TACKIFIER IS REQUIRED ON ALL SLOPES EXCEEDING 3:1. RATE OF 2-2 1/2 TONS PER ACRE WITHIN 24 HRS. AFTER SEEDING. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE MULCHED WITH HAY OR STRAW AT A GRASSING, FERTILIZATION & MULCH Ds3 Ds1Ds2PERMANENT GRASSING MULCHINGTEMPORARY GRASSING DUST CONTROL NOTES GA. RULE [391-3-1-.02] - (N) - FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL (N) FUGITIVE DUST: 1. ALL PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY OPERATION, PROCESS, HANDLING, TRANSPORTATION OR STORAGE FACILITY WHICH MAY RESULT IN FUGITIVE DUST SHALL TAKE ALL REASONABLE PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT SUCH DUST FROM BECOMING AIRBORNE. SOME REASONABLE PRECAUTIONS WHICH COULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT DUST FROM BECOMING AIRBORNE INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: (I) USE, WHERE POSSIBLE, OF WATER OR CHEMICALS FOR CONTROL OF DUST IN THE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, THE GRADING OF ROADS OR THE CLEARING OF LAND; (II) APPLICATION OF ASPHALT, OIL, WATER, OR SUITABLE CHEMICALS ON DIRT ROADS, MATERIALS, STOCKPILES, AND OTHER SURFACES WHICH CAN GIVE RISE TO AIRBORNE DUSTS; (III) INSTALLATION AND USE OF HOODS, FANS, AND FABRIC FILTERS TO ENCLOSE AND VENT THE HANDLING OF DUSTY MATERIALS. ADEQUATE CONTAINMENT METHODS CAN BE EMPLOYED DURING SANDBLASTING OR OTHER SIMILAR OPERATIONS; (IV) COVERING, AT ALL TIMES WHEN IN MOTION, OPEN BODIED TRUCKS, TRANSPORTING MATERIALS LIKELY TO GIVE RISE TO AIRBORNE DUSTS; (V) THE PROMPT REMOVAL OF EARTH OR OTHER MATERIAL FROM PAVED STREETS ONTO WHICH EARTH OR OTHER MATERIAL HAS BEEN DEPOSITED. 2. THE PERCENT OPACITY FROM ANY FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE LISTED IN PARAGRAPH (2)(N)1. ABOVE SHALL NOT EQUAL OR EXCEED 20 PERCENT. Du DUST CONTROL BY IRRIGATION SITE MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1.THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHO PREPARED E.S. & P.C. PLAN SHALL INSPECT THE INSTALLATION OF THE INITIAL SEDIMENT STORAGE REQUIREMENTS AND PERIMETER CONTROL BMP'S WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION. 2.ANY AMENDMENTS AND/OR REVISIONS TO THE E.S. & P.C. PLANS WHICH WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON BMP'S WITH HYDRAULIC COMPONENTS MUST BE CERTIFIED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 3.WASTE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED TO WATERS OF THE STATE, EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY A SECTION 404 PERMIT. 4.THE ESCAPE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE PREVENTED BY THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES PRIOR TO, OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 5.EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. IF FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPROVED PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO CONTROL OR TREAT SEDIMENT SOURCE. 6.ANY DISTURBED AREA LEFT EXPOSED FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN 14 DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH MULCH OR TEMPORARY SEEDING. 7.DEVELOPERS AND/OR CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE OR CLEAN OUT ANY SILT, DIRT, MUD OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF DEBRIS THAT COMES OFF THEIR SITE AND FINDS ITS WAY INTO A PRIVATE POND, ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY, INTO A COUNTY OWNED POND OR COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY TO INCLUDE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE "GEORGIA MANUAL FOR ON-SITE SEWAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS" FOR WASTE DISPOSAL, SANITARY SEWER AND/OR SEPTIC TANK INCLUDING ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT OPERATIONS AND MAINTAIN THE PROJECT SITE SO AS TO MINIMIZE THE CREATION AND DISPERSION OF DUST. DUST CONTROL SHALL BE USED THROUGHOUT THE WORK AT THE SITE. 2.THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE CLEAN WATER, FREE FROM SALT, OIL AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS TO BE USED FOR ON-SITE DUST CONTROL. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY WATER SPRAYING EQUIPMENT CAPABLE OF ACCESSING ALL WORK AREAS. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT STRICT DUST CONTROL MEASURES DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION PERIODS ON-SITE. THESE CONTROL MEASURES WILL GENERALLY CONSIST OF WATER APPLICATIONS THAT SHALL BE APPLIED A MINIMUM OF ONCE PER DAY DURING DRY WEATHER OR MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT DUST EMISSIONS. 5.FOR WATER APPLICATION TO UNDISTURBED OIL SURFACES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: A. APPLY WATER WITH EQUIPMENT CONSISTING OF TANK, SPRAY BAR, PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE GAUGE. B. ARRANGE SPRAY BAR HEIGHT, NOZZLE SPACING AND SPRAY PATTERN TO PROVIDE COMPLETE COVERAGE OF GROUND WATER. C. DISPERSE WATER THROUGH NOZZLES ON SPRAY BAR AT 20 PSI MINIMUM. KEEP AREAS DAMP WITHOUT CREATING NUISANCE CONDITIONS SUCH AS PONDING. 6.FOR WATER APPLICATION TO SOIL SURFACES DURING DEMOLITION AND/OR EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL: A. APPLY WATER WITH EQUIPMENT CONSISTING OF A TANK, PUMP WITH DISCHARGE GAUGE, HOSES AND MIST NOZZLES. B. LOCATE TANK AND SPRAYING EQUIPMENT SO THAT THE ENTIRE EXCAVATION AREA CAN BE MISTED WITHOUT INTERFERING WITH DEMOLITION AND/OR EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT OR OPERATIONS. KEEP AREAS DAMP WITHOUT CREATING NUISANCE CONDITIONS SUCH AS PONDING. C. APPLY WATER SPRAY IN A MANNER TO PREVENT MOVEMENT OF SPRAY BEYOND CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO "MANUAL FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IN GEORGIA" LATEST EDITION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT DUST CONTROL BMP'S. VEGETATIVE PRACTICES CODE PRACTICE DESCRIPTIONMAP SYMBOLDETAIL SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES GEORGIA UNIFORM CODING SYSTEM FOR STRUCTURAL PRACTICES STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS: ALL DESIGNS WILL CONFORM TO AND ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE "GREEN BOOK" ALSO KNOWN AS THE "MANUAL FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IN GEORGIA", LATEST EDITION. SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND CODE PRACTICE DESCRIPTIONSYMBOL MAPDETAIL DUST CONTROL ON DISTURBED AREAS DISTURBED AREA STABILIZATION (WITH SODDING) DISTURBED AREA STABILIZATION (WITH MULCHING ONLY) SEDIMENT BARRIER Sd1-COMPOST SEDIMENT TUBE Ds1 ESTABLISHING TEMPORARY PROTECTION FOR DISTURBED AREAS WHERE SEEDINGS MAY NOT HAVE A SUITABLE GROWING SEASON TO PRODUCE AN EROSION RETARDING COVER. DISTURBED AREA STABILIZATION (WITH MULCHING ONLY) A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER USING SODS ON HIGHLY ERODABLE OR CRITICALLY ERODED LANDS.Ds4 DISTURBED AREA STABILIZATION (SODDING) CONTROLLING SURFACE AND AIR MOVEMENT DUST ON CONSTRUCTION SITES, ROADWAYS AND SIMILAR SITES. DUST CONTROL ON DISTURBED AREAS BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ L 2 0 1 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 8 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 3 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects x MT. PLEASANT, SCAUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2016 LF C C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C C 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C CHECK DAM HB-HAYBALE Ds4 SODDING FLOW. AGE DITCH OR AREA OF CONCENTRATED CONSTRUCTED ACCROSS A SWALE, DRAIN- A SMALL TEMPORARY BARRIER DAMCHECKDAM Cd-S (Stone) Cd-Hb (Haybale) Cd-Fs (Filter Sock) GEORGIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATION NUMBER ISSUED:EXPIRES: 0000057484 ZACHARY K. DAVIS .GXGN++%GTVKHKGF&GUKIP2TQHGUUKQPCN AN IMPOUNDING AREA CREATED BY EXCAVATING AROUND A STORM DRAIN DROP INLET. THE EXCAVATED AREA WILL BE FILLED AND STABILIZED ON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES. INLET SEDIMENT TRAP Sd2-F Filter Fabric & Frame Sd2-B Baffle Box Sd2-Bg Block & Gravel Drop Inlet Protection Sd2-G Gravel Drop Inlet Protection Sd2-S Sod Inlet Protection Sd2-P Curb Inlet Protection Sd2-SS Silt Saver EXCAV Excavated Inlet Sediment Trap FILTER SOCK CHECK DAM CATCH BASIN CURB CATCH BASIN GUTTER LINE GRAVEL BAGS (2-BAGS HIGH)SPILLWAY (1-BAG HIGH) NOTE: 1.INTENDED FOR SHORT-TERM USE. 2.ALLOW FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND CLEAN-UP 3.BAGS MUST BE REMOVED AFTER ADJACENT OPERATION IS COMPLETED. 4.PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC IN AREAS WITH HIGH SILTS AND CLAYS. FILTER FABRIC (SEE NOTE 4) CURB INLET PROTECTION WITH GRAVEL BAGS NO SCALE P L A N SECTION BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ G O R D O N P K W Y . _ D O U G B E R N A R D _ I r r - 4 6 1 6 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 8 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 3 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects AUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2015 LF C DI101 A AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A 1" = 20' IRRIGATION PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C C 9/ 2 6 / 1 6 C FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C D 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ G O R D O N P K W Y . _ D O U G B E R N A R D _ I r r - 4 6 1 6 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 8 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 3 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects AUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2015 LF C CI103 A AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A NTS Air Tube Calsense 1000-S Moisture Sensor Buried Within Root Zone #14 AWG UF Wire Maximum Length 3,000 ft. Locate Sensor At Base Of Rootball, Depth Will Vary With Size Of Plant Material. Cover With Compacted Soil CORRECT SENSOR PLACEMENT IS DETERMINED BY A CALSENSE FIELDTECHNICIAN. DIAGRAM REPRESENTS CORRECT SENSOR WIRING ONLY. RCV Finish Grade Waterproof Electrical Connectors CORRECT SENSOR DEPTH Note :Sensor Should Be Submereged In Water For About 15 Minutes Before Installation RCV Field Wires From Controller Approximately 3" to 4" Of Compacted Cover In Turf Areas Sch 40 Electrical Sweep Ell For Low Voltage Control Wires Optional Dome Antenna Model ANT-1 (Digital Radio) Model ANT-1-RR (Digital Radio and RR Radio Remote option) Model LR-DOME (Local Radio) Model LR-DOME-RR (Local Radio and RR Radio Remote option) Model RR-DOME (RR Radio Remote option) Finish Grade Louvered Vent Sch 40 Electrical Sweep Ell For 120 VAC Power 26"x24"x8" Concrete Base Piston Connected To Flip Top CALSENSE PRE-ASSEMBLED ENCLOSURE INSTALLATION DETAIL Black Wire Harness Communications Cable Splice Detail RCV Field Wires TYPICAL FIELD WIRING DIAGRAM White Field Common Master Valve Calsense Model FM Flow Meter Red Flow Meter Wire Black Flow Meter Wire Remote Control Valves 18"x18"x6" Poured In Place Concrete Base Electrical Sweep Ell For Paige P-7171-D Cable In Conduit To ET1 or ET2000 Controller Finish Grade 2" Below Top Of Concrete Base Finish Grade Water Meter Black Flow Meter Wire Red Flow Meter Wire White Field Common Wire Conduit For Paige Cable Calsense Controller Black Wire Harness Blue Master Valve Wire VANDAL RESISTANT ET GAGE ENCLOSURE ET Gage Model ETG Mounted On Metal Stake And Base (included with enclosure) ET Gage Mounting Bracket (included with ET Gage) RAIN BUCKET Mounting Clamps POST MOUNTED 8" Of Pea Gravel In Valve Boxes Minimum Upstream Distance 10 x Flow Meter Size Rectangular Valve Box Master Valve FLOW METER INSTALLATION White Blue Black Red All Models of Calsense Controllers Paige P-7171-D Communications Cable 3M Scotchlok No. 3570 Connector Sealing Packs Pea Gravel Valve Box Minimum Downstream Distance 5 x Flow Meter Size Upstream Length 10" 12.5" 15" 20" 30" Waterproof Electrical Connectors (do not use pre-filled type connectors) Pipe Sizing Chart F.M. Size 1" 1.25" 1.5 2" 3" Calsense Flow Meter Downstream Length 5" 6.25" 7.5" 10" 15" ALL SYSTEMS LIGHTNING PRONE AREAS GROUNDING INSTRUCTIONS DETAIL Calsene TP-110 Surge Arrester Calsense TP-1 Transient Protection Board 5/8"x8' Copper Ground Rod (one for each controller) #6 Solid Copper Ground Wire to Ground Rod Ground Lug FOUNDED 1970 C NOT TO SCALE CALSENSE DETAILS 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C C 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 FOUNDED 1970 C GRAPHIC SCALE IRRIGATION DETAILS N. T. S. 45 1 H 45 1 H 45 2 M 45 3 L BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ G O R D O N P K W Y . _ D O U G B E R N A R D _ I r r - 4 6 1 6 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 8 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects AUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2015 LF C CI102 A AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A NTS R 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C C 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 BO R D E R : J L A 2 4 x 3 6 V e r t T B l o c k . D W G R E V . 1 0 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 3 C R E K: \ 3 0 4 2 1 2 0 1 \ G o r d o n H w y a n d W a l t o n W a y \ G O R D O N P K W Y . _ D O U G B E R N A R D _ I r r - 4 6 1 6 . d w g P l o t t e d : 12 / 6 / 2 0 1 6 9 : 2 8 A M B y : Za c h a r y D a v i s , R L A Since 1980 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY : RE V . DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N SHEET TITLE : JOHNSON, LASCHOBER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. REV. CL I E N T : PR O J E C T N A M E : PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N : SCALE: DATE: DRAWING NO. This document is the property of Johnson, Laschober & Associates, P.C. The unauthorized reproduction, copying or otherwise use of this document is strictly prohibited and any infringement thereupon may be subject to legal action. BY 1 2 3 4 A B C 1 2 3 4 Architects x Engineers x Landscape Architects AUGUSTA, GA TEL (706) 724-5756 TEL (843) 619-4656 FAX (706) 724-3955 WWW.THEJLAGROUP.COM x 3042.1201 LANCE CHEELY DRP A 5/ 1 6 / 1 6 GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T 53 5 T e l f a i r S t . | A u g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 GO R D O N H W Y A T D O U G B A R N A R D P K W Y GA T E W A Y L A N D S C A P E RI C H M O N D C O U N T Y 1/18/2015 LF C CI104 A AU G U S T A , G E O R G I A NTS CONTROLLER CHART NOT TO SCALE IRRIGATION NOTES/ DISCLAIMER (Based on 2 days a week to provide 1" of water) GD O T E N C R O A C H M E N T P E R M I T LF C B 8/ 0 3 / 1 6 FI N A L P L A N - I S S U E D F O R P E R M I T LF C C 12 / 0 6 / 1 6 Revised 07-01-89/Revised12-05-91/Revised06-02-00/Revised09-15-03/Revised04-17-09 RECORDED ______________ _ Book No. ________________ Page ______________ Date _________________ County ________________ Page __________ INDEMNITY AGREEMENT Indemnity Agreement entered into this __________ day of , 20 , by and between Augusta- Richmond County (hereinafter call the “APPLICANT”) and the GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, as agency of the State of Georgia with offices at One Georgia Center, 600 Peachtree Street NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30308 (hereinafter called the “DOT”); WITNESSETH: For and in consideration of the DOT’s grant of permission for landscaping and irrigation (hereinafter called the “ENCROACHMENT”), as indicated on Permit # 01-2017-003-245 on the right of way of State Route 10 , in Land Lot of the Land District of Richmond County, Georgia. The APPLICANT shall and does agree to indemnify and save harmless the DOT and DOT’s agents, officers, servants and employees from any and all lawsuits, actions or claims of any character brought because of any injuries or damage received or sustained by any person, persons or property arising out of the construction, operation and/or maintenance of the ENCROACHMENT located as described herein. The APPLICANT shall and hereby agrees to maintain the ENCROACHMENT in good repair at the APPLICANT’s sole expense and shall and does hereby release DOT from any claims arising out of the APPLICANT’s failure to so maintain the ENCROACHMENT. The APPLICANT shall and hereby agrees to make all repairs at its own expense for any damage caused by DOT employees or agents to the ENCROACHMENT which is located on DOT right-of-way in accordance with the permit numbered above and issued with this agreement. The DOT reserves the right to enter the area described in the ENCROACHMENT to insure the area is being maintained in accordance with DOT safety and maintenance standards. DOT shall notify the APPLICANT of any repairs which need to be made and the APPLICANT shall correct the problem as soon as such notification is given. If the APPLICANT has not made said repairs within a reasonable period of time, the DOT may enter the property to effect such repairs. The APPLICANT shall reimburse the DOT for any cost incurred as a result of DOT’s performing such repairs. The DOT reserves the right to terminate this indemnity Agreement at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice to the APPLICANT. Upon receipt of such notice as specified by DOT, the APPLICANT at its own expense, shall be responsible for removing the ENCROACHMENT and returning the area to its original condition or an acceptable substituted condition. The term of the Indemnity Agreement shall be for a period of fifty (50) years, commencing upon execution hereof by DOT, subject to any rights of termination as are hereinabove set forth. The covenants herein contained shall except as otherwise provided accrue to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, individually or through their authorized officers, agents or attorneys-in-fact as the case may be, causing their respective seals to be affixed hereto the day and year first above written. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPLICANT By: __________________________________ (SEAL) Corporate Seal Required for Corporations Commissioner [Plus two (2) Signatures] ATTEST: __________________________________________ Signature of Property Owner (or Corporate Officer) ______________________________________ Treasurer (STATE SEAL) __________________________________________ Corporate Officer (or Another Property Owner) ______________________________________ Unofficial Witness __________________________________________ Typed Name of Owner (or Typed Names & Titles of Corporate Officers who signed above) __________________________________________ Signature of APPLICANT __________________________________________ Typed Name of APPLICANT (and Title if Applicable) __________________________________________ Notary Public Commission Expiration: (NOTARIAL SEAL) Augusta Entryway Landscape Improvements Program - Gordon Highway at Doug Barnard Landscape Improvements Mowing and Maintenance Agreement and Indemnity Agreement Hardie Davis, Jr., Mayor Hardie Davis, Jr., Mayor Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Abandon .06 Acres Adjacent to 1507 Saint Luke Street Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to determine that 0.06 acres adjacent to 1507 Saint Luke Street, shown as “Tract B” on the attached plat has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public purpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7- 2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities as directed by Augusta Engineering Department and Augusta Utilities Department. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The abandonment request has been reviewed by all essential county departments and administrators and approvals were received to this abandonment request. The plat of said 0.06 acres adjacent to 1507 Saint Luke Street is attached. Analysis:In addition to the information provided in the above Background section, publication notices will be made for a public hearing to be held, with results to be presented to the Commission. Notice to the property owners located thereon will be made, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2(b)(1). Financial Impact:Cost of publication and advertisement of public hearing. Alternatives:Approve or deny request to determine that 0.06 acres adjacent to 1507 Saint Luke Street, shown as “Tract B” on the attached plat be abandoned. Recommendation: Approve determination and request for abandonment of 0.06 acres adjacent to 1507 Saint Luke Street, shown as “Tract B” on the attached plat pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2, with the abandoned Cover Memo property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies) as allowed by law, and an easement(s) as directed by the Augusta Engineering Department and the Augusta Utilities Department to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities and drainage. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: N/A REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Approve Tower Cloud, Inc's Formal Registration Application Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to approve Tower Cloud, Inc.’s Formal Registration Application to access the public right of way within the Augusta, Georgia for the provisions of telecommunications services as a State-Certified Utility.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Tower Cloud, Inc.’s "Registration Information" has been submitted and is attached, along with letter of its statement of purpose and functions. Analysis:The Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Title 46, Chapter 5, Article 1regulates the registration information to be furnished the governing body of the political subdivision of the State of Georgia by providers of telecommunication services as State Certified Utilities in public roads and highways and/or right of ways. Tower Cloud has submitted its initial registration application in accordance with such provisions. In its application, Tower Cloud has provided, among other things, a description of the service area and map (Paragraph "D"), services to be provided (Paragraph "E"), and its affirmative declaration to shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations of Augusta, the State of Georgia and federal government (Paragraph "F"). Financial Impact:Tower Cloud will pay to Augusta the customary fee of three percent (3%) of the applicable annual gross revenue relative to Augusta, Georgia, as set forth in attached Memorandum of Understanding. Alternatives:Approve or deny application Recommendation: Approve application subject Tower Cloud accepting attached Memorandum of Understanding in accordance with the laws, Cover Memo ordinances and regulation of Augusta, Georgia, State of Georgia and FCC. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM Engineering Services Committee Motion to approve Tower Cloud, Inc.’s Formal Registration Application to access the public right of way within the Augusta, Georgia for the provisions of telecommunications services as a State- Certified Utility. Department: Law Caption: Motion to approve Tower Cloud, Inc.’s Formal Registration Application to access the public right of way within the Augusta, Georgia for the provisions of telecommunications services as a State-Certified Utility. Background: Tower Cloud, Inc.’s "Registration Information" has been submitted and is attached, along with letter of its statement of purpose and functions. Analysis: The Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Title 46, Chapter 5, Article 1regulates the registration information to be furnished the governing body of the political subdivision of the State of Georgia by providers of telecommunication services as State Certified Utilities in public roads and highways and/or right of ways. Tower Cloud has submitted its initial registration application in accordance with such provisions. In its application, Tower Cloud has provided, among other things, a description of the service area and map (Paragraph "D"), services to be provided (Paragraph "E"), and its affirmative declaration to shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations of Augusta, the State of Georgia and federal government (Paragraph "F"). Financial Impact: Tower Cloud will pay to Augusta the customary fee of three percent (3%) of the applicable annual gross revenue relative to Augusta, Georgia, as set forth in attached Memorandum of Understanding. Alternatives: Approve or deny application Recommendation: Approve application subject Tower Cloud accepting attached Memorandum of Understanding in accordance with the laws, ordinances and regulation of Augusta, Georgia, State of Georgia and FCC. Funds are available In Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Authorize Condemnation to Acquire Property in Fee Simple Interests (Parcel 087-2-134-00-0) - 2017 Walnut Street Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-134-00-0) - 2017 Walnut Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The owner died intestate and all heirs cannot be determined or located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $6,300.00. Analysis:Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. Financial Impact:The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. Alternatives:Deny condemnation. Recommendation:Approve condemnation. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Cover Memo Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM __________ EDITION __________ CAPTION: Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-134-00-0) 2017 Walnut Street BACKGROUND: The owner died intestate and all heirs cannot be determined or located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $6,300.00. ANALYSIS: Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. ALTERNATIVES: Deny condemnation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve condemnation. AGENDA DATE: February 28, 2017. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 ADMINISTRATOR: _________________________ FINANCE: _______________________________ DATE: February 7, 2017 TO: The Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr. Mayor Members of the Augusta Commission Members of the Public Services Committee FROM: Randolph Frails, Esquire and Andrew MacKenzie, General Counsel SUBJECT: Acquisition of 7,500 sq. ft. to City of Augusta, Georgia from Jack Brown, by and through his known and unknown heirs Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Authorize Condemnation to Acquire Property in Fee Simple Interests (Parcel 087-2-192-00-0) - 167 Aragon Drive Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-192-00-0) - 167 Aragon Drive. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The City has been unable to locate the owner; therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $7,500.00. Analysis:Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. Financial Impact:The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. Alternatives:Deny condemnation. Recommendation:Approve condemnation. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Cover Memo Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM __________ EDITION __________ CAPTION: Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-192-00-0) 167 Aragon Drive BACKGROUND: The City has been unable to locate the owner; therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $7,500.00. ANALYSIS: Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. ALTERNATIVES: Deny condemnation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve condemnation. AGENDA DATE: February 28, 2017. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 ADMINISTRATOR: _________________________ FINANCE: _______________________________ DATE: February 7, 2017 TO: The Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr. Mayor Members of the Augusta Commission Members of the Public Services Committee FROM: Randolph Frails, Esquire and Andrew MacKenzie, General Counsel SUBJECT: Acquisition of 7,500 sq. ft. to City of Augusta, Georgia from Mary Alice Harris Wright Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Authorize Condemnation to Acquire Property in Fee Simple Interests (Parcel 087-2-193-00-0) - 173 Aragon Drive Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-193-00-0) - 173 Aragon Drive. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The City has been unable to locate the owner; therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $7,400.00. Analysis:Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. Financial Impact:The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. Alternatives:Deny condemnation. Recommendation:Approve condemnation. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Cover Memo Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM __________ EDITION __________ CAPTION: Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-2-193-00-0) 173 Aragon Drive BACKGROUND: The City has been unable to locate the owner; therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $7,400.00. ANALYSIS: Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. ALTERNATIVES: Deny condemnation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve condemnation. AGENDA DATE: February 28, 2017. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 ADMINISTRATOR: _________________________ FINANCE: _______________________________ DATE: February 7, 2017 TO: The Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr. Mayor Members of the Augusta Commission Members of the Public Services Committee FROM: Randolph Frails, Esquire and Andrew MacKenzie, General Counsel SUBJECT: Acquisition of 7,500 sq. ft. to City of Augusta, Georgia from Mary Alice Harris Wright Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Authorize Condemnation to Acquire Property in Fee Simple Interests (Parcel 087-4-055-00-0) – 2029 Golden Rod Street Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-055-00-0) – 2029 Golden Rod Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The owner died intestate and all heirs cannot be determined or located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $6,300.00. Analysis:Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. Financial Impact:The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. Alternatives:Deny condemnation. Recommendation:Approve condemnation. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Cover Memo Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM __________ EDITION __________ CAPTION: Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-055-00-0) 2029 Golden Rod Street BACKGROUND: The owner died intestate and all heirs cannot be determined or located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $6,300.00. ANALYSIS: Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. ALTERNATIVES: Deny condemnation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve condemnation. AGENDA DATE: February 28, 2017. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 ADMINISTRATOR: _________________________ FINANCE: _______________________________ DATE: February 7, 2017 TO: The Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr. Mayor Members of the Augusta Commission Members of the Public Services Committee FROM: Randolph Frails, Esquire and Andrew MacKenzie, General Counsel SUBJECT: Acquisition of 7,500 sq. ft. to City of Augusta, Georgia from Arthur Burnett, by and through his known and unknown heirs Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Authorize Condemnation to Acquire Property in Fee Simple Interests (Parcel 087-4-056-00-0) - 2033 Golden Rod Street Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-056-00-0) - 2033 Golden Rod Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The owner died intestate and all heirs cannot be determined or located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 9,150 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $7,000.00. Analysis:Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. Financial Impact:The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. Alternatives:Deny condemnation. Recommendation:Approve condemnation. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Cover Memo Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM __________ EDITION __________ CAPTION: Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-056-00-0) 2033 Golden Rod Street BACKGROUND: The owner died intestate and all heirs cannot be determined or located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 9,150 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $7,000.00. ANALYSIS: Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. ALTERNATIVES: Deny condemnation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve condemnation. AGENDA DATE: February 28, 2017. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 ADMINISTRATOR: _________________________ FINANCE: _______________________________ DATE: February 8, 2017 TO: The Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr. Mayor Members of the Augusta Commission Members of the Public Services Committee FROM: Randolph Frails, Esquire and Andrew MacKenzie, General Counsel SUBJECT: Acquisition of 9,150 sq. ft. to City of Augusta, Georgia from Arthur Burnett, by and through his known and unknown heirs Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Authorize Condemnation to Acquire Property in Fee Simple Interests (Parcel 087-4-072-00-0) - 2061 Golden Rod Street Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-072-00-0) - 2061 Golden Rod Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The owners cannot be located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $6,300.00. Analysis:Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. Financial Impact:The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. Alternatives:Deny condemnation. Recommendation:Approve condemnation. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Cover Memo Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM __________ EDITION __________ CAPTION: Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-072-00-0) 2061 Golden Rod Street BACKGROUND: The owners cannot be located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $6,300.00. ANALYSIS: Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. ALTERNATIVES: Deny condemnation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve condemnation. AGENDA DATE: February 28, 2017. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 ADMINISTRATOR: _________________________ FINANCE: _______________________________ DATE: February 7, 2017 TO: The Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr. Mayor Members of the Augusta Commission Members of the Public Services Committee FROM: Randolph Frails, Esquire and Andrew MacKenzie, General Counsel SUBJECT: Acquisition of 7,500 sq. ft. to City of Augusta, Georgia from Willie Mae Smith and Viola McCloud Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Authorize Condemnation to Acquire Property in Fee Simple Interests (Parcel 087-4-073-00-0) - 2063 Golden Rod Street Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-073-00-0) - 2063 Golden Rod Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The owners cannot be located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $6,300.00. Analysis:Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. Financial Impact:The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. Alternatives:Deny condemnation. Recommendation:Approve condemnation. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Cover Memo Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM __________ EDITION __________ CAPTION: Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-073-00-0) 2063 Golden Rod Street BACKGROUND: The owners cannot be located. Therefore, the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $6,300.00. ANALYSIS: Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. ALTERNATIVES: Deny condemnation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve condemnation. AGENDA DATE: February 28, 2017. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 ADMINISTRATOR: _________________________ FINANCE: _______________________________ DATE: February 7, 2017 TO: The Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr. Mayor Members of the Augusta Commission Members of the Public Services Committee FROM: Randolph Frails, Esquire and Andrew MacKenzie, General Counsel SUBJECT: Acquisition of 7,500 sq. ft. to City of Augusta, Georgia from Willie Mae Smith and Viola McCloud Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Authorize Condemnation to Acquire Property in Fee Simple Interests (Parcel 088-1-032-00-0) - 149 Aragon Drive Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 088-1-032-00-0) - 149 Aragon Drive. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Despite repeated efforts the City has been unable to reach an agreement with the property owner as to the property’s value, and therefore the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $7,400.00. Analysis:Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. Financial Impact:The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. Alternatives:Deny condemnation. Recommendation:Approve condemnation. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Cover Memo Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo AGENDA ITEM __________ EDITION __________ CAPTION: Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests (Parcel 088-1-032-00-0) 149 Aragon Drive BACKGROUND: Despite repeated efforts the City has been unable to reach an agreement with the property owner as to the property’s value, and therefore the City seeks to acquire the property through condemnation. In order to proceed and avoid further project delays, it is necessary to condemn a portion of subject property. The required property consists of 7,500 sq. ft. in fee. The appraised value is $7,400.00. ANALYSIS: Condemnation is necessary in order to acquire the required property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The necessary costs will be covered under the project budget. ALTERNATIVES: Deny condemnation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve condemnation. AGENDA DATE: February 28, 2017. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS: G/L: 328-041110-52.12122 J/L: 212828203-52.12122 ADMINISTRATOR: _________________________ FINANCE: _______________________________ DATE: February 7, 2017 TO: The Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr. Mayor Members of the Augusta Commission Members of the Public Services Committee FROM: Randolph Frails, Esquire and Andrew MacKenzie, General Counsel SUBJECT: Acquisition of 7,500 sq. ft. to City of Augusta, Georgia from Christine Gordon Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Motion to Determine Abandonment of a Portion of Heath Street, East of Berkmans Road Department:Law Department:Law Caption:Motion to determine that a portion of Heath Street, East of Berckmans Road as shown on the attached plat has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public purpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7- 2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities as directed by Augusta Engineering Department and Augusta Utilities Department.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:The abandonment request has been reviewed by all essential county departments and administrators and approvals were received to this abandonment request. The plat of said portion of Heath Street, East of Berckmans Road is attached. Analysis:In addition to the information provided in the above Background section, publication notices will be made for a public hearing to be held, with results to be presented to the Commission. Notice to the property owners located thereon will be made, pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2(b)(1). Financial Impact:Cost of publication and advertisement of public hearing. Alternatives:Approve or deny request to determine that a portion of Heath Street, East of Berckmans Road be abandoned. Recommendation: Approve determination and request for abandonment of a portion of Heath Street, East of Berckmans Road pursuant to O.C.G.A. §32-7-2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies) as allowed by law, and an easement(s) as Cover Memo directed by the Augusta Engineering Department and the Augusta Utilities Department to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities and drainage. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Street Light Request Southhampton Section 2 Department:Traffic Engineering Department:Traffic Engineering Caption:Motion to approve the amount of $7,108.72 to have 17 Streetlights added to Ashton Drive and Ardwick Drive in the Southampton subdivision at a cost of $255.00 per month for a total of $3,060.00 per year thereafter. This is also to approve a new lighting tax district for the 52 lots associated with above roads. Funding is available in the Street Lighting budget account #2760416105312310.(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background:Jefferson Energy Cooperative will install 17 streetlights in the Southampton Subdivision. The cost of this installation is $7,108.32.72 which will be paid from the Street Light Budget account and then reimbursed over the next year by the special taxing district that is being created with the lots associated with the streetlights. The Yearly cost for these lights will be $3,060.00 paid for by the 52 lots associated with these roads in a special taxing district to appear on the 2017 tax bill. The cost per lot added to the tax bill is $205.00 for the first year to cover up front cost and $68.00 per year thereafter to cover the cost of the light and maintenance. Analysis:The cost proposal was received by Jefferson Energy Cooperative on February 10, 2017 in the amount of: CONTRACTOR Jefferson Energy BID Upfront Cost - $7,108.72 Yearly Cost - $68.00 Financial Impact:Adequate funds are available and expenditure of this amount will leave sufficient funds for any emergencies that may arise before the end of the year. Alternatives:1). Approve installation of new streetlights by Jefferson Energy Cooperative in the amount of $7,108.72 and approve the creation of a new taxing district in the Southampton Subdivision for Section 2 in the amount of $205.00 for the first year and $68.00 Cover Memo thereafter for the 52 lots associated. 2). Do not approve and disregard proposal. Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 276-04-1610-5312310 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Minutes Department: Department: Caption:Motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Commission held February 21, 2017 and Special Called meeting held February 28, 2017. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda Commission Chamber - 2l2ll20l7 ATTENDANCE: Present: Hons. Hardie Davis, Jr., Mayor; Jefferson, Guilfoyle, Sias, Frantom, M. Williams, Smith, Fennoy, D. Williams, Hasan and Davis, members of Augusta Richmond County Commission. il\.VOCATION: Bishop Richard B. Peoples Pastor Faith Outreach Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE T]NITED STATES OF AMERICA. Five (5) minute time limit per delegation DELEGATIONS A. Mr. Darin K. Moore regarding backyard project approved by Planning & Item Development Department. Action: None lB Darin K. Ittoore.odf IB ItemApprovelsheet.html Motions Motion;---"- Motion TextI VDEJt - Unanimous consent is given to delete this item from the agenda. B. Ms. Lynne Blanchard regarding the closing findings of the Engineering Department. Made Seconded MotionBy By Result ofEmmett Street Lane and the ltem Action: None B Lvnne Blanrhard.rdf lB ItemAoorovalsheet.html Motions l,[t:",, Motion rext Made Seconded MotionBy By Result This item is considered in conjunction with Item 48. C. Ms. Artirea C. Decatur regarding her experiences in Augusta. Presentation is made by Ms. Decatur. D. Mr. Moses Todd regarding the proposed Dixon Airline Road Landfill. lB Artirea C. Decatur.odf lB ItemAnorovalsheet.html Motions Motion Motion TextI ype lB Moses Todd 2-21-20l7.pdf lB ItemApprovalsheet html Motions MotionType Motion Text Presentation is made by Mr. Todd. CONSENT AGENDA (Items l-44) PLANNING Made SecondedBy Bv Made SecondedBy Bv Item Action: None Item Action: None Item Action: Approved Motion Result Motion Result 1. F'INAL 9-Arequestfor-^^!-rg ^larr vrrrurrrry rlruur IJ,IJL, Ilutl\ rl - ar-('t7 - n IEqUESL lof conculrence with the Augusta Planning Commission to approve a petition by Southern Partners, on behalf of Crowell & Co., requesting final plat approval for Granite Hill, Section 4. This residential subdivision is locat.d ut Covington Court and Harper Franklin Avenue and contains 52 lots. E ItemAoorovalSheet.html Motions X:'1" Motion Text Made By Seconded By ffiXiilype Motion to A __-^--^ approve. Commisioner CommissionerApprove Motion passes l0- Sean Frantom sammie Sias Passes 0. 2. SA-52 - A request for concuffence with the Augusta Planning Commission to Item approve a petition to amend Section 400-H - Standard for Streets and Roadwoy, Action: Street Right-of-Way Widths of the Subdivision Regulations for Augusta, Approved Georgia by updating standards to be consistent with the Augusta Engineering Street and Road Technical Manual. B sa-52.odf lB ItemApprovalsheet.html Motions X:j1" Motion Text Made By seconded By Motion I YPe ----- -" Result Motion to Approve il3#;"sses r0- S;#Hf,:fr S;,T#,:'Ji*.' passes 0. 3. TA-07 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Georgia Planning ltem Commission to approve a petition to updated Tree Ordinance for Augusta, Action: Georgia. (Approved by the Commission February 7 ,2017 - second reading) Approved lE TA-report.pdf lB Dec 2016 TA-07 ordinance Lanquage - New ordinance in its Entiretv.odf IB ltemAporovalsheet.html Motions X:l:'" Motion Text Made By Seconded By MotionrYPe -'---- -J vvlv'svu .-J Result Motion to approve. Voting No: Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Sammie Sias,. CommissionerAPProve Marion Williams. Motion Passes 8-2. William Fennoy Mary Davis Passes 4. Z-17-03 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Planning Commission to Item approve with the conditions stated below; a petition by Randy Gaitor and Action: Maxine Donaldson, on behalf of Rosalind Newton requesting a Special Approved Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section26-l (h) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta, Georgia affecting property containing .23 acres and known as 2429 Damascus Road. Tax Map 056-4-062- 04-0 - DISTRICT 2 1. The home shall be staffed in three (3) 8-hour shifts on a 7'day,24-how basis with no staff sleeping in the home. 2. A private room shall be provided for staff to conduct business.3. No more than four (4) clients are permitted to reside in the home based on the number and size of the existing bedrooms. 4. ln order to continue to maintain a local business license, the applicant must continue to maintain a license with the State of Georgia, proof of compliance with the minimum requirements of Chapter 111 .8-62.01 of the O.C.G.A must be provided, and the applicant must provide updated fire department compliance for four (4) clients. All requirements must be met within six (6) months of approval of the Special Exception, or the Special Exception is void. 5. If wheelchair bound persons reside in the residence all 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design requirements must be met, including but not limited to: ' All doorways must be at least 3 feet wide. . At least one bathroom that permits a wheelchair dependent person to use all bathroom facilities unimpeded. 6. All conditions must be met prior to issuance of a local business license. 7. If approved, a security system to insure the safety and welfare of the residents must be installed by the property owner before a business license shall be issued. 8. Staff will review the most recent area crime report to determine whether the use should continue to operate following one (1) year of the effective date of approval. E z-17-03.odf E ltemAnorovatsheet.html Motions Motion Motion Textrype Motion Result Motion to approve. Mr. M. Williams votes Present. Voting No: Commissioner Made By Seconded By Commissioner Commissioner Ben Hasan, Commissioner A ---^..^ Andrew Jefferson,Approve uommlssroner Sammie Sias. Motion Passes 6-3 -1. (5 objectors are noted) Motions Motion Motion Textr ype Substitute motion to disapprove the request. Voting No: Commissioner Mary Davis, Commissioner Denv William Fennoy,' uommlstoner Sean Frantom, Commissioner Wayne Guilfoyle, Commissioner Dennis Williams. Motion Fails 5-5. William Fennoy Passes CommissionerMarion Fails Williams Motionseconded BY Resurt Dennis Williams Made By Commissioner Sammie Sias The Mayor abstains. Motion fails 5-6. 5. Z'17-07 - A request for concurence with the Augusta Planning Commission to ltem approve with the conditions stated below; a petition by Gerard Bryant, on Action: behalf of Melanie Taylor, requesting a Special Exception to allow catering in a ApprovedP-l (Professional) Zone per Section 20-2 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta, Georgia affecting property containing 0.56 ucr.s urdknown as 1433 Stovall street. Tax Map 044-3-075-01-0 - DIsTRrcr 21. The use of the property shall be limited to food preparation only for a catering business, or those uses permitted by right in-the P-l (Profeisional) Zone. 2. No sale of food from the catering business may take place at the g.ubjec! property. 3. The food preparation area for the catering business islimited to a maximum of 500 square feet of the existing building and any expansion of the catering business beyond the 500 square feet limitation must come back before the P.lanning Commission as a new Special Exception . 4. Allcatering-related activities shall cease by 11:00 p.m.5. No catiring related events (receptions, parities, luncheons, etc.) may take place on the subjectproperty. 6. Applicant provides proof of compliance with local building and fire codes before receiving a business license. 7. The applicant must obtat a local business license with six (6) months of approval or the Special Exception is uoi9. 8. Ary future development of the property must comply with any ordinances and regulations in effect when submitting a site plan. lE z-17-07.pdf lE ItemAoorovalsheet.html Motions Y:li" Motion TextI ype Motion to ^ aDDrove.APProve vtltion passes lo- 0. B z-17-08.pdf lB ItemAonrovalsheet.html Motions Motion Motion Textrype Motion to APProve ffi3ffi"sses lo- 0. Made By Seconded By Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes Motion Result Motion Result Passes Item Action: Approved 6. Z'17-08 - A request for concurence with the Augusta Planning Commission to approve with the conditions stated below; a petition by Neighborhood Outreach Ministries, on behalf of Dr. Yolanda Allen, requesting a change of zoning from Zone R-lA (One-family Residential) to Zone P-l (Professional) affecting property containing .34 acres and known as 2309 OId Savannah Road. Tax Map - 087-3-044-00-0 - DISTRICT 2 l. Any future development of the property will require a privacy fence and a buffer containing trees and landscaping along the northwestern and northeastem property lines to buffer the subject property from the residential uses. Additional landscaping and/fencing to buffer the current proposed use from the adjoining residentiaLproperty may be required at the discretion of the Planning Director. 2. Use is limited to Professional office uses only. 3. Schedule individual client visits by appointment only. 4. There shall be no outside storage of materials associated with the business visible from adjoining properties. 5. Demonstrate compliance wlth any other ordinances, codes and/or regulations, before issuing a Certificateof Occupancy and a Business License. 6. If installed any parking and security lighting must be directed away from any nearby residential properties. Made By Commisioner Sean Frantom Seconded By Commissioner Sammie Sias 7' Z'17'10 - A request for conculrence with the Augusta Planning Commission to ltemapprove with the conditions stated below; a petltion by Bowinan Consulting, Action:on behalf of W. R. Powick, requesting a .hange of zoning from Zone I Approved(Agriculture) to zone B-z (General Business) affecting propertycontaining .56 acres and known as part of 2208 Tobacco Road. part"of iax tf"i,155-0-039-00-0 - DISTRICT 6 1. The development must be consistent withthe latest Concept Plan submiued with the rezoning application. 2. Theapplicant must tie into city sewer at the owner's e*penr..-3. Tt. Site plan mustcomply with any other ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of development. 4. Any new curb cuts and additional right-of-way and easementsfor the site are subject to approval by the Augusta Enlineeringbepartment and Georgia DOT, as applicable. 5. Direct parking lot and r.rurity lighting awayfrom any residentia! Rloperties. 6. A plat of ihe combined pioperty must bLapproved and recorded before the site plan will be released. 7. -Th; retainingwall on the concept plan must be designed by a structural engineer and may bI no closer than l0 feet from the face of the wall to the exterior property lines. E z-17-l0.odf lB ItemAnorovalsheet,html Motions Y.:':' Motion Text Made Bytype Seconded By Motion Result Motion to ^ ?DDrOVe.APProve vtition passes lo- 0. Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 8. Z-17-1,1 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Planning Commission to ltemapprove with the conditions stated below; a petition by CSC Properties, on Action: behalf of Dennis Stanfield, requesting a change of zoning from -Zone B-l Approved(Neighborhood Business) and Zone B-2 (General Business) with conditionsto Zone B-2 affecting property containing .96 acres and known as 3l2Z and 3129 Washington Road and 1019 Beverly Heights Drive. Tax Map 0l l-0- 060-00-0, 011-0-060-01-0 and 0ll-0-060-02-0 - DISTRTCT 7 t. rhe three existing lots must be combined into one lot, if the zoning petition is approved, before a development plan may be submitted. 2. Development of the propertywill require a privacy fence and a buffer containing trees and landscaping utongthe northern property line. The remainder of tne site must comply liith thEAugusta Tree Ordinance and may require additional landscaping io-buffer theproposed use from the adjoining residential propefiy at thJ diicretion of thePlanning Director. 3. Use must be limited to tiie arra ol changes and minor autorepair (such as battery replacement) while the customer waits. Major autorepairs are prohibited on the site and no vehicles may be stored overnight on the site. 4. All repair work be performed inside the building and there shall be no outside storage of tires or other repair related materials on the property. 5. The building must be parallel to Beverly Heights Drive to minimize disruption from noise to the adjoining residential property to the north. 6. Any open bay on the business must be a minimum of 100 feet from the residential property line to the north. 7. The site plan must demonstrate compliance with any other ordinances and regulations at the time of development. 8. Any new curb cuts for the site are subject to approval by the Augusta Engineering Department and Georgia DOT, as applicable 9. Parking lot and security lighting be directed away from any nearby residential properties. PUBLIC SERVICES 9. Motion to approve New Ownership Application: A.N. l7-4: request by Item William C. Lendernan, Jr. for an on premise consumption Beer & Wine Action: License to be used in connection with Giuseppe's located at 3690 Wheeler Approved Road. There will be Sunday Sales. District 3. Super District 10. (Approved by Public Services Committee FebruaW l4r20l7) E z-17-ll.odf @ ItemAoorovalsheet.html Motions Motion Motion TextI ype Motion to ^ dDDrove.APProve vtotion passes lo- 0. B Giuseooes.odf E ltemAoorovalSheet.html Motions Motion;----- Motion Textr ype Motion to APProve il3,fl]r""sses ro- 0. Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes Made By Seconded By Made By Seconded By Motion Result Motion Result Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom sammie Sias Passes 10. Motion to approve New Location: A.N. l7-5: request by Peng Zhao for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer, & Wine License to be used in connection Item Action: with The Juicy Crab located at 2834 Washington Rd. There will be Sunday Approved Sales. District 7. Super District 10. (Approved by public Services Committee February 14, 2017) lE The Juicv Crab.odf B ItemAoorovalsheet.html Motions X:'1" Motion Text Made By Seconded By Motion f YPe ''---- -r vlvvusvs sJ Result Motion to a _^-^_--_- approve. Commisioner CommissionerApprove Motion passes l0- sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 0. 11. Motion to approve the Downtown Redevelopment Plan Update. (Approved Item by Public services committee Februarv 14,2017) Action: Approved IB Downtown Redcvelopment Plan Update.pdf IB ItemAoorovalsheet html Motions Motion rr^4:^- 'Tr^-,a f,r^r- h-- ^ Motion; ----" Motion Text Made By Seconded Byrype -.----- -'r Result Motion to approve. A _-_^_-^ Mr. Jefferson and Mr. Commissioner CommissioneApprove iiri t ou,. Marion williams Grady smith r Passes Motion Passes 8-0. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 12. Motion to reauthorize an ordinance designating Rocky Creek Enterprise Zone Itemwith expanded boundaries. Originally approved by Commission June 4, Action: ?902_. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee February 14, Approved 2017) B Rockv c.eek Enterp.i.e zone Revised Bounda.v Description 02.0l.l7.docx.pdf IB Rockv Creek EntZone Pronosed Exnended Rorrndrries 07 01 17 n,rf B ItemAonrovalsheet.html Motions |^#:'" Motion Text Made By Seconded By Motion Result Passes Motion to Approve if3,#r,sses r0- S:#T[":,:H ff,T,T#'Ji*" 0. 13. Motion to approve authorization request for the Procurement and Law Departments to review and update the Procurement Code to incorporate recent changes in State Law regarding Partnership for Public Facilities andInfrastructure Act (sB 59) (unsoticited proposals). (Approved by Admin istrative Services Com mittee Februa ry | 4, 2017) Item Action: Approved E Senrte Bill 59.pdf @ ItemAonrovalsheet.html Motions X:t:"" Morion Text Made Byr ype seconded By Motion Result Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes Motion to ^ aDDrove.APProve vtotion Passes lo- 0. PUBLIC SAFETY 14. Motion to approve the Contract with Emergency Communications Network, Item LLC to provide CodeRED Next Services, which includes CodeRED Weather Action: Warning and IPAWS submission App and authorize the Mayor to execute the Approved approved documents. (RFP 16-248) (Approved by Finance Committee February 14,2017) E connnrn acnrruoNr.oar E l6-248-Reouest-for-Prooosal_sentJo_newsoaper.ndf E to-zl8 tar orrlclq,L.ndt E 16-248 Phase 2 Cumulative.pdf E 16-248 Department Rerommendation of Award.pdf tB Process Repardins RFPs.odf B Mail List and Demandstar Planholders.odf B l6-248 MPB Attendees and Telphone Conference Attendees.pdf E ltemAoorovalsheet.html 15. Motion to approve the award of RFP 17-137 Emergency Apparatus/Fire ltem Pumper to Ten-8 for six (6) Pierce Fire Pumpers and to authorize the Mayor to Action: execute the appropriate documents. (Approved by Public Safety Committee Approved February 14,2017) IB Recommendation Letter to Procurement.pdf IB Pierce Price Sheet.odf IB Contract.odf IB tZ-lSU Request for Prooosal sent to newsDeDer.Ddf B t z-t 3z_t,lr_orrIct.r,.oar E l7-137 Cumulative.pdf E Process Resardins RFPs.ndf E MaiLlist and Demandstar Planholders.ndf B tz-l3z Mpg.oor lB ItemAoorovrlsheet.html Motions []li"' Morion Text Made Byrype Motions l'#:" Motion rext Made By Motion to. aDDrove.Approve Motion Passes 10- 0. Motion to ^ aDDrove.APProve uition passes lo- 0. seconded By Motion Result Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes Seconded By Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Motion Result Passes FINANCE 16. Motion to approve bid award Dawson & Taylor as Commercial Property Item Insurance Broker with annual quote. (RFP fi:nq (Approved by Finance Action: Committee February l4r20l7) Approved B l7-124 Reouest for Proposal sent to newspaper.pdf E lz-124 tag oFplcleL.oar IE l7-124 Denartment Recommendation of Award.ndf E Process Resardins RFPs.ndf IE Mail List and Demandstar plenholders.pdf E Cumulative Evaluation Sbeet.ndf lE ItemApprovalsheet html Motions H:'1"' Motion Text Made Byrype seconded By Motion Result Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 17.Motion to approve submittal of funding proposal for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility for Seniors and Disabled Persons to the Georgia Department of Human S-ervices and Central Savannah River Area - Agency on Aging. (Approved by Finance Committee F'ebruary l4r20l7) B ARTSMPo AusustaRichmoncoAikenCo ALI InfoSheet fo, Grrrt Ano- line item.doc lB ARTSMPO CoordinatedHumanervice plan FTA5310 trrbatr.docx lE Ausust MPO - Match.pdf E NIPO GDHS Lcfier Dec 29 20l6.pdf E ItemAonrovalsheet.html Motion to ^ ?DDrOVe.APProve Motion passes lo- 0. Motions r#:" Motion rext Made By Motion to ^ aDDrove.Approve Motion Passes 10- 0. Item Action: Approved seconded By Motion Result Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 18. Motion to approve award of a $51,448.50 contract to Landmark Preservation, ItemLLC, for the rehabilitation project at the Meadow Garden House Museum. Action:(RFP 17-132) (Approved by Finance Committee February 14,2017) Approved B lZ-llZ Request for Prooosal sent to newsnrner rcvicinn n.tf E I7.IJ2 TAB oFFICIAL.Ddf E l7-132 Departments Recommendation of Awrrd.pdf IB Process Resardinq RFPs.odf Motion to Approve ffi|,|H'*"sses r0- ff#T;"Tf ff###'Jl*" passes 0. 19. Motion to approve Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance with Safety ltemNational - Incumbent With Statutory limitJ and a S1,000,000 Self Insurei Action: Retention (SIR - otherwise known as the deductible) to cover all positions for a Approvedpremium of $304,882.(Approved by Finance committee February 14, 2017\ lB Mail List and Demandstar planholders,odf E Cumulative Evaluation.odf E ltemAoorovalsheet.html Motions Y.*:" Morion Text Made Byrype lE Excess rrlorkrrs Como Renewal prooosal.ndf lB ItemApnrovalsheet.html Motions *j1'" Morion Text Made Byr ype Seconded By Motion Result Motion to . aDDrove.APProve vtotion passes lo- 0. seconded By Motion Result Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes ENGINEERING SERVICES 20. Motion to approve bid award #16-263 to Blair Construction, Inc. for services Item associated with construction of the Fort Gordon New Water and Sewage Action: Connections under the Task Order Program for Infrastructure in the amount of Approved $356'594.15. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee FebruaW 14, 2017) lB 16-263 ITB to peper.pdf E Tas sHeet oFrlctaL.oat B ro-zel vrpr.par lB Recommendation Letter from Deoartment.odf E Mail Labels.pdf lB LSBOP Information - Blair Construction.pdf E It€mApprovalsheet.html Motions *11'" Morion Text Made By seconded By MotionType Result Motion to a _^-_-^__^ approve. Commisioner CommissionerApprove vtotion Passes l0- Sean Frantom Sammie Sias rasses 0. 21. Motion to approve award of Construction Contract to Reeves Construction Item Company in the amount of $9,578,429.25 for Marvin Griffin Road Action: Improvements Project as requested by AED. Award is contingent upon receipt Approved of signed contracts and proper bonds. (Bid Item 16-222) (Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 14, 2017) B CPB.NTIMBER.EIGHT I-9-I 7.xlsx IB 16-222 ITB - Newspaper.pdf E TAB sHEf,T-officirt.pdf lB l6-222 Recommendation of Award.pdf IB Mail List and Demandstar Planholders.pdf E illanin Griflin - Reeves Compliance Letter.pdf E ltemAoorovalsheet.html Motions Motion rr_1!_ m Motion;----- Motion Text Made By Seconded BylYPe -'"'- -r Result Motion to approve. Approve Mr. Smith out. Commissioner Commisioner Motion passes 9_0. Marion Williams Sean Frantom Passes 22. Motion to authorrze condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests ltem (Parcel 087-2-103-00-0) - 1930 Carolina Road.(Approved by Engineering Action: Services committee February 1412017) Approved IB 1930 Carolina Road - Condemnation-ndf B ItemAoorovalsheet.html Motions Motion Motion Text Made By Seconded By Motion Type Result Motion to Approve ffi3,',""h"sses r0- S;#TlSaffiH ffffi,'j'Jl*" passes 0. 23. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests Item (Parcel 087-2-ll l-00-0) - 201 Aragon Drive. (Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee X'ebruary l4r20l7) Approved E 201 Aragon Drive - Condemnation.pdf lB ItemAnorovalsheet.html Motions []j:" Motion Text Made By seconded By MotionlYPe '''--- -r Result Motion to ^ approve. Commisioner CommissionerApprove Motion passes l0- Sean Frantom sammie sias Passes 0. 24. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests Item (Parcel 087-2-218-00-0) - 2012 Willow Street. (Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee February 14,2017) Approved B 2012 Willow Street - Condemnerion.ndf lB ItemAonrovalsheet.html Motions []j:" Motion Text Made By seconded By Motionrype ''---- -.t Result Motion to Approve ffifl,l""h"sses r0- !:#T[f*il ffffi,';"Ji*.' passes 0. 25. Motion to authortze condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests Item(Parcel 087-2-219-00-0) - 2010 Willow Street. (Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee February l4r20l7) Approved IE 2010 Willow Street - Condemnation.pdf E ItemAonrovalsheet html Motions Motion rf^r:^-'T,^--a f,r^r^'-- c r rh Motion; -""- Motion Text Made By Seconded ByI YPe ''---- -r Result Motion to Approve ffif,|il'r"sses r0- S:#T[f*fr ff###'Ji*.' passes 0. 26. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests Item (Parcel 087-2-224-00-0) - 2006 Golden Rod Street.(Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee February l4r20l7) Approved lB 2006_Golden Rod_Street_- Condemnation.pdf B |lcmAnp.ovalsheet.html Motions Motion r/r^r:^-'Tr^--^ r,r-r-n-- d t rh Motion;"'^"" Motion Text Made By Seconded Byf ype - ----- -'I -----'--- -J Result Motion to Approve ffi$,"":'r"sses r0- 3;#T;":,:T ff##,:'Ji*.' passes 0. 27. Motion to authorue condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests Item (Parcel 087-4-032-00-0) - 2048 Dan Bowles Road.(Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee February l4r20l7) Approved B 2048 Dan Bowles Road - Condemnation.pdf IB ItemAoorovalsheet.html Motions H:':" Motion Text Made By seconded By MotionIYPe - ---- -r Result Motion to Approve i||,#r"sses r0- ff#Ti'""Tf ff##;'Ji*" passes 0. 28. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests Item (Parcel 087-4-074-00-0) - 2069 Golden Rod Street.(Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee f,'ebruary 14,2017) Approved B 2069 Golden Rod Street - Condemnatiop.pdf lB ItemAoorovatshcet.html Motions Motion t,--L2^--m--1 rr r h Motion;- ---- Motion Text Made By Seconded Byrype --- -'1 Result Motion to Approve ffi|ffi"ssesrO- ff#Hffi ffffi#'Jffi.' passes 0. 29. Motion to authortze condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests Item (Parcel 088-1-021-00-0) - 124 Horton Drive. (Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee X'ebruary l4r20l7) Approved B 124 Horton Drive - Condemnation.pdf IE ItemAnnrovalsheet.html Motions Motion tt _,2^_ m^__a rr r n ^ Motionii,n;" Motion Text Made By Seconded By Resutt Motion to Approve ffiffi:h"sses r0- !:#T[":*il !;##,'j'Jl#' passes 0. 30. Motion to authortze condemnation to acquire property in fee simple interests Item (Parcel 088-3-004-00-0) - 2013 Florida Road. (Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee February l4r20l7) Approved lB 2013 Ftoridr Road - Condemnetion.pdf B ltemAonrovalsheet.html Motions [|j:"Il Motion Texr Made By seconded By MotionrYPe r - ------- -J Result Motion to approve. Approve vrotio, passes r0- ff#Hf,:fl S;##,:'Ji*.' passes 0. 31. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire property in Fee Simple Interests ltem- 223 Aragon Drive (Parcel 087-2 119-00-0). (Ap[roved by Engineering Action: Services Committee f,'ebruary l4r20l7) Approved IB 223 Arapon Drive_-_Condemnation.odf lB ItemAoorovalsheet.html Motions X:11"" Motion Text Made By Seconded By MotionIYPe - ---- -r Result Motion to Approve ffi3,#;*ses r0- S;#Tl.xffiH ff,T,T,:'Jl*.' passes 0. 32. Motion to auth orize condemnation to acquire title of a portion of property for Item lght of way (Parcel 059-3-766-00-0) 1433 Twiggs Street.(Approved by Action: Engineering services committee February 14,2017) Approved lE 1433 Twiggs Street - Condemnation.pdf B ItemAoorovrlsheet.html Motions |#:" Motion Text Made By seconded By f"'rtJil Motion to Approve ffififi'i^ses 10- s:#ffi,ffi 3"T#,'j'Jl*.. passes 0. 33. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire title of a portion of property in Item fee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-085-00-0) - 2060 Willow Street. (Approved Action: by Engineering Services committee February l4r2ol7) Approved B 2060 Willow Street - Condemnation.pdf IB ItemAonrovalsheet.html Motions X:tl" Motion Text Made By seconded By Motion r YPe ,s...,,(rErr r-'J Result Motion to Approve i|$,"J'**ses r0- ff#T;f,:I !;##,:'Ji*" passes 0. 34. Motion to authotize condemnation to acquire title of a portion of property in Itemfee simple interests (Parcel 087-4-116-00-0) - 2066 Golden [od- Stieet. Action:(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February l4r2ll7) Approved E 2066 Golden-Rod Street - Condemnation.pdf IE ItemAonrovalsheet.html Motions Motion rtr^.:^- ,r,^_-. f,,r_r- h_- ^ Motion=-"'"" Motion Text Made By Seconded ByI'ype -'---- -J ResultJI Motion to ^ approve. Commisioner CommissionerApprove Motion passes l0- Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 0. 35. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire title of the entire parcel, (Parcel Item 087-2-169-00-0) 2016 Walnut Street. (Approved by Engineering Services Action: Committee February l4r20l7) Approved IB 2016 r*'alnut Street - Condrmnation.pdf IB ItemAnnrovalsheet html Motions X:j1'" Motion Text Made By seconded By MotionI'YPe "--- -r Result Motion to Approve ffi3,l:h"sses r0- S:#Tl.'"ffif S;,T,T,'j'Jl*.' passes 0. 36. Motion to authorize condemnation to acquire title of the entire parcel, (parcel Item 087-4-031-00-0) 204-C Dan Bowles Road. (Approved by Engineering Action: Services Committee February l4r20l7) Approved B ZOIC Den Rnwler Rnrd - (-nnrlo-notinn -nr Motion Result Motion to approve. Approve Mr. Smith out. Commisioner Commissioner Motion passes 9-0. Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 37. Motion to determine that Franklin Lane from Tuttle Street Eastward to the Item Terminus, as shown on the attached plat has ceased to be used by the public to Action: the extent that no substantial public pu{pose is served by it or that its removal Approved from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, and to receive as information the results of the public hearing held regarding the issue of abandonment pursuant to O.C.G. A. 532-7-2, with the abandoned property tobe quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities as directed by Augusta Engineering Department and Augusta Utilities Department and adopt the attached Resolution. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee X'ebrua r! 14, 2017) IB Abandonment - Franklin Lane - 2nd Readinq.odf lF Resolution Franklin Lane.ndf E ItemApprovalsheet.html Motions []j*1'" Motion Text Made ByI'ype Motion to Aoorove llRrove. Commisioner Commissioner- -rr-- '- Motion Passes 10- Sean Frantom Sammie Sias 0. Passes 38. Motion to determine that Railroad Avenue (in its entirety), Roulette Lane Item (from McCauley Street to Hunter Street), and Floyd Street (from Roulette Lane Action: to the Southem Property Line of l4l9 Hunter Street) as shown on the attached Approvedplat has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public pulpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, pursuant to O.C.G.A. $ZZ-l-2, with the abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as E ItemAnnrovalsheet.html Motions Motion Motion Textrype Made By Seconded By Seconded By Motion Result provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandonedportion for existing or future utilities as directed by Augusta Engineering Department and Augusta Utilities Department. (Approved by Engineering Seryices Committee February 14, 2017) lB Abandonment_- Railroad Ave: portion of Roulette Lane Flovd St. - Lesal Descrintion plet_ndf E ltemAonrovalsheet.html Motions []j:" Motion Text Made ByI ype Motion to ^ dDDrove.APProve vtotio, passes lo- 0. seconded By Motion Result Commisioner Commissioner Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 39. Motion to approve award of Construction Contract to R.J. Haynie & Associates, Inc. for the TIA ITS Master Plan Implementation Project, and the TIA Richmond County Emergency and Transit Vehicle Preempt (EVP) System Project which are both subject to value engineering - not to exceed $5,333,130. Award is contingent upon receipt of signed contracts, proper bond, and development of LSBOP utilization action plan as requested by AED. (Bid 16-2a0)(Approved by Engineering Services Committee February 14, 2017) B Copy of CPB - 0t.09.l7.pdf E 16-240 ITB - Newsnaoer Revised-nrtf B ro-zno orrrcnuour B l6-240 Depertment Recommendetion of Award.pdf lB 16-240 MPB and Telephone Conference.pdf lB Nlail List and Demandstar Planholders.pdf E ITS - RJ_Havnie.pdf lB ItemAoprovatsheet.html Motions [,ol:Il Motion Text Made Byr ype Item Action: Approved Motion to ^ approve.APProve Motion passes lo- 0. Commisioner Sean Frantom Seconded By Commissioner Sammie Sias Motion Result Passes 40. Motion to approve amending the ARC Waste Management ItemPlan. (Approved by the Engineering Services Committee Februaiy 14, Action:2ol7)) APProved IB Dixon Airline (00J).odf B ltemAonrovalsheet.html Motions Y:-'1'" Motion Text Made By seconded By MotionI'YPe Result Motion to refer thisDefer item back to plannir Commissioner Commissioner & Development. '8 B"tt Hasan Dennis Williams No action is taken on this motion due to the passage of the substitute motion. Motions X:tl" Motion Text Made By seconded B-- MotionType rvrur'ru[ r c"trr lvraue rry Deconoeo tly Result Substitute motion to approve initiating the amendment to the Solid Waste Management Planning process. Mr. Sias Commisio Commissioner Approve and Mr. M. Williamrabstain. t ;'''TI#tt wavne PassesIom cuilfoyle Voting No: Commissioner Ben Hasan, Commissioner Andrew Jefferson. Motion Passes 6-2 -2. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 41. Motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Commission Item held February 7th and Special Called meeting held February 14,2017. Action: Approved B Resular_Commission Meetinq Februarv_7 20l7.odf IE Called Commission Meetinp Februarv l4 20l7.pdf lB ltemAonrovalsheet.html Motions Motion r,r^4:^- rr1^--. rr^r^ n-- d r r h Motion;--'-- Motion Text Made By Seconded ByI YPe Result Motion to ^ approve. Commisioner CommissionerApprove ilotion passes l0- Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 0. APPOINTMENT(S) 42. Motion to approve the following appointments representing District 5: Ms. Item Ruby B. Johnson-Public Facilities, Inc.; Mr. Marcus Cobb-Augusta Port Action: Authority; Mr. Joseph Wideman-Animal Control Board effective Approved immediately and Mr. Quincy Jordon-Riverfront Development Board effective April l, 2017 . B Mrrcus A.-Cobb.odf IB Rubv B. Johnson.odf IB Josenh Wideman.odf B Quincy Jordon.pdf B ItemApprovalsheet.html Motions Motion rf,_1!__-T , r- r h ^ Motion;-"-"" Motion Text Made By Seconded By'I'ype - ----- -'I --------- -r ResultJT Motion to Aoorove approve. Commisioner Commissioner-rr- - - Motion Passes l0- Sean Frantom Sammie Sias Passes 0. 43. Motion to approve the appointment of Ms. Monica R. Mack to the Citizens Item Small Business Advisory Board representing District 6. Action: None E Monica Mack.odf B ItemAoprovalsheet.html Motions Motion r,r^r:^_,T,^__a Made Seconded Motion;------.. Motion TextrYPe By By Result Mr. Hasan withdraws his request for the appointment until a later time. 44. Motion to approve the reappointment of Mr. Tim Martin to the General Item Aviation Commission representing District 7. Action: Approved E Timothv R. Martin.pdf lB ItemAnprovalsheet.html Motions X:tl"" Motion Text Made By seconded By MotionType Result Motion to a -_-^_-^ approve. Commissioner CommissionerApprove triotio, passes l0- Wayne Guilfoyle Grady Smith Passes 0. ****END CONSENT AGENDA**** AUGUSTA COMMISSION 212u2017 AUGUSTA COMMISSION REGULAR AGENDA 2t2U2017 (Items 45-52) ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 45. Clarification from the Administrator regarding the Compensation Study as it Item relates to compensation for custodial employees. (Requested by Action: Commissioner Ben Hasan) Approved IB ltemApprovalSheet.html Motions X:11" Motion Text Made By Seconded B MotionType rvrullur r €xr firaoe rry Deconoeo lty Result Motion to approve receiving this item as a ^-^-.^_. information. Mr. M. Commissioner CommisionrApprove #'t,rtu-, abstains. Mr. william Fennoy sean prantoil Passes Sias out. Motion Passes 8-0 -1. 46. Motion to approve the recommended revisions to the Personnel Policy & Item Procedures Manual (PPPM), Chapter III, Grievances, Discipline, & Action: Appeals. (Requested by Commissioner Sammie Sias) Rescheduled IB Apenda Rot. S. Sies 2-21-l7.ndf IB PPPllf Chapter III Revision.Amendment 2.2l.l7.doc.pdf IB ItemApprovalsheet.html Motions H:t1" Motion Text Made By seconded By MotionIYPe '.---- -'t Result Motion to refer this item back to committee. Mr. Sias out. Defer voting.No: commisioner commissioner uommlssloner Sean Frantom william Passes Ben Hasan ) FennoY Commissioner Marion Williams. Motion Passes 8-2. PUBLIC SAFETY 47. Discuss Probation Services Department. (No recommendation from Public Item Safety Committee February 14,2017) Action: Rescheduled lB ItemAnnrovalsheet.html Motions Motion Morion Text Made By seconded By HXiiI ype Motion to refer this item back to committee. Mr. Sias out. Defer x;IH,Ii;,., !;#Tff,:H commissioner passes BenHasan, - FennoY Commissioner Marion Williams. Motion Passes 8-2. ENGINEERING SERVICES 48. Motion to determine that a portion of Emmett Street Lane, as shown on the Item attached plat has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no Action: substantial public purpose is served by it or thai its removal from the county Approvedroad system is otherwise in the best public interest, and to receive as information the results of the public hearing held regarding the issue of abandonment pursuant to o.C.G.A. $32-7-2, withthe abandoned property to be quit-claimed to the appropriate party(ies), as provided by law and an easement to be retained over the entire abandoned portion for existing or future utilities -as directed by Augusta Engineering Department anil Augusta Utilities Department and adopt the attached Resolution. (No recommendation from Engineering Services Committee February 14, 2017) lB Abandonment - Emmttt Slreet l.rne - 2nd Rerdino nrlf IB Resotution Lrna ndf Motion to Annrnrre approve. Commissioner Commissioner' rvvrv v v Motion Passes l0- Marion Williams William Fennoy 0. B ltemAoorovalsheet html Motions Motion Motion Textlype lE ItemAnorovalsheet.html Motions Motion Motion Textr ype Motion to approve. ^ .-.-. _ Ms. Davis, Mr. SiasAPProve and Mr. Hasan out. Motion Passes 7-0. Made By Seconded By Made By Commissioner William Fennoy Seconded By Commissioner Grady Smith Passes Motion Result Passes Motion Result Item Action: Approved 49. Motion to approve l)Engineering and Bill Beazley Homes provide a timelinefor Streetlights in the Haynes Station Subdivision as discussed al Commission Commiffee on 14 February 2017.2)Engineering and Bill Beazley Homes provide a timeline for Streetlights in the Manchester Subdivision as discussed at Commission Commiffee on 14 February 2017 3) Engineering andBill Beazley Homes provide an update on the South Hampton residents petition and the timeline for Streetlights as discussed 2017. (Requested by Commissioner Sammie Sias) lB Street Lishts Com. Sias ltem-ndf APPOTNTMENT(S) 50. Motion to approve the reappointment ofmembers to the Urban Item Redevelopment Agency (URA) Agency, Messrs. Bob Young, Brad Owens, Action: Isaac McKinney, Ms. Bonnie Ruben and the appointment of Mr. Hardi Approved Jones to the vacant seat due to the resignation of Ms. Amanda Bryant. (Requested by Commissioner Ben Hasan) B Urban Redevelooment Asencv (flRA) lS.doc IB LIRA Powers. orsrnization 36.6l.l8.pdf IB Talent Bank Applications - Bob Young Brad Owens lsaac McKinney Bonnie Ruben.pdf B ItemAnnrovalsheet.html Motions |'#:"' Motion Text Made By seconded By Hrllir' Motion to approve the appointments of Mr. Bob Young, Ms. Bonnie Approve l*"'l,lllffi#'' ;:fffi:';"' E:#Iffiil.' Passes JOI abstains. Mr. Sias out. Motion Passes 8-0 -1. ADDENDUM 51. Motion to approve the appointment of Mr. David Dunagan to the Augusta Item Housing & Community Development Citizens Advisory Board representing Action: District 10. Approved lB ltemApprovalsheet.html Motions s]jt1"' Motion Text Made By Seconded By Motion'I'ype ''---- -r -'--"--'-r Result Motion to approve. Approve Mr. Sias out. Commissioner Commissioner Motion passes 9-0. Mary Davis Ben Hasan Passes 52. Motion to approve the appointment of Mr. Michael Thurman to the Urban Item Redevelopment Agency (URA). (Requested by Commissioner Wayne Action:Guilfoyle) None E ltemApprovalshect.html Motions Motion Motion Text Made Seconded Motion'I'ype By By Result (Correction made to list the board as the Housing & Community Development Citizens Advisory Board representing District 8) Motions Motion f,,r^4:^_ ,r!-__1 Made Seconded MotionType Motion Text By By Result No action is taken on this appointment at this time. LEGAL MEETING A. Pending and Potential Litigation. B. Real Estate. C. Personnel. 53. Motion to approve execution by the Mayor of the affidavit of Item compliance with Georgia's open Meeting Act. Action: None !?"-glnrng Meetings www.augustaga.gov CALLED MEETING COMMISSION CHAMBER February 28,2017 Augusta Richmond County Commission convened at I l:00 a.m., Tuesday, February 28, 2017, the Honorable Hardie Davis, Jr., Mayor, presiding. PRESENT: Hons. Jefferson, Guilfoyle, Sias, Frantom, M. Williams, Smith, Fennoy, D. Williams, Hasan and Davis, members of Augusta Richmond County Commission. Mr. Mayor: Okay, all right. We're going to call this meeting to order. The Chair recognizes Attorney MacKenzie. 1. LEGAL MEETING A. Pending and potential litigation B. Real estate C. Personnel Mr. MacKenzie: I would entertain a motion to go into executive session to discuss pending and potential litigation, real estate and personnel. Mr. Hasan: So move. Mr. M. Williams: Second. Mr. Mayor: Voting. Ms. Davis, Mr. Frantom and Mr. Smith out. Motion carries 7-0. [LEGAL MEETING] Ms. Davis: All right, Mr. MacKenzie. 2. Motion to authorize execution of the alfidavit of compliance with Georgia's Open Meeting Act. Mr. MacKenzie: I would entertain a motion to execute the closed meeting affidavit. Mr. M. Williams: So move. Mr. Frantom: Second. Ms. Davis: We have a motion and a second. Please vote. Motion carries 10-0. Ms. Davis: Mr. MacKenzie. Mr. MacKer.z;ie; I would entertain a motion to approve the renewal of the lease for the property located at3423 Mike Padgett Highway, a request by the State Properties Commission for one year. Mr. Sias: So move. Mr. Jefferson: Second. Ms. Davis: We have a motion and a second. Please vote. Mr. M. Williams: Didn't we have some stipulation that was supposed to be added to bring that back? Mr. MacKenzie: Yes. Disregard that one. Ms. Davis: Thank you, Commissioner Williams. So, Mr. MacKenzie, we don't have a vote today on that, right? Mr. MacKenzie: Disregard that one. We do have a motion to approve reconsideration of the January 17r20l7 request for a special exception petition by Stanley Mack on behalf of Stanley Mack and Shelley Mack requesting a special exception to establish a family personal care home for Section 26H of the Comprehensive Zontng Ordinance and such hearing will take place at the next regularly scheduled Commission meeting with appropriate notice to go to the petitioner. Mr. D. Williams: So move. Mr. Frantom: Second. Ms. Davis: We have a motion and a second. Please vote. Mr. Sias and Mr. Hasan vote No. Motion carries 8-2. Ms. Davis: Okay, Mr. MacKerzie. Any other business? Mr. MacKenzie: That's all I have. Ms. Davis: Okay, Public Services. Lena J. Bonner Clerk of Commission IMEETING ADJOURNED] CERTIFICATION: I, Lena J. Bonner, Clerk of Commission, hereby certifu that the above is a true and correct copy of the minutes of the Called Meeting of the Augusta Richmond County Commission held on February 28,2017. Clerk of Commission Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM District 3 Appointment Department: Department: Caption:Motion to approve the appointment of Ms. Janmarie Hall to the Augusta Animal Control Citizens Advisory Board effective April 1, 2017 representing District 3. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Clerk of Commission Commission, Authorities, & Boards Talent Bank Application Title First Name * Middle Name* Last Name * Suffix Date Of Birth * Address * Home Phone * Work Phone Registered Voter * Marital Status* Education * Race * Gender * Occupation * Interests Commissions, Authorities, & Boards Mrs. Janmarie Nicholson Hall 3/2/1954 City Augusta State / Province / Region GA Postal / Zip Code 30904 Country USA Street Address 2509 Bellevue Ave. Address Line 2 571-271-7769 District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 None Married Some College White Female Retired Animals & their Welfare, Photography, Gardening, Genealogy, DAR Volunteer For*Animal Control Board * * Email I currently have relatives working for the City of Augusta Yes No I currently server on an Augusta Board, Commission, or Authority Yes No I would like to receive an email confirmation of my submission. Yes No janmarieh@verizon.net Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM District 5 Appointment Department: Department: Caption:Motion to approve the appointment of Dr. Charles Larke- Augusta Aviation Commission; Ms. Marian T. Brown-Augusta Public Library Board of Trustees and Ms. Barbara Gordon- ARC Zoning & Appeals Board representing District 5. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo /) . J-rn -u,, TALENT BANK INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE DESIRING TO VOLUNTEER THEIR SERVICES ON.*UTHORITY, BOARD OR COMMISSION FORAUGUSTA, GEORGIA NOTE:ANY INFORMATION ENTERED ON THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WOULD BECOME PUBLIC INFORMATION UPON YOUR SUBMISSION/APPOINTMENT. ****************************************************************************************************************************************l ss, ef/a*c d kator/, t,"/ '7'7 ,/^-. HoME pnoNe'701 * Z3['tzirX BUS. PH9N E 706 ^ ft7f' 7rr7 (;."L rtt A -ro.l €,4soror ?*0 * 7Y COUNTY ,,, STATE SEX: MALE / FEMALE REGISTERED VOTER: YES I/ NO oT T EMAIL DATE: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 't1. STREET HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: vonNc DrsrRrcr # r7 MARITAL STATUS: SINGLE ENGAGED EDUCATION: RELATIVES WORKING FOR THE COUNTY: frt MCE: WHITE AFRICAN-AMERICAN MARRIED- SEPARATED DIVORCED I/ d""'v' ' ,^^l (/on n ASIAN AMERICAN SPANISH SURNAMED AMERICAN INDIAN OTHER (specify) LIST BOARDS YOU PRESENTLY SERVE ON: I ., 2;,. 4/trr- Zon.r( n { -r.-./.*, 2. 3. LIST ANY AREA IN WHICH YOU HAVE A PARTICULAR INTEREST OR EXPE E'n u ^.u, Vulo*/tn, G-,*r,.ln/, ^, ( /not|-a ISE.12. v.4- Rev. 6-2016 .J /- TALENT BANK INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE, ro BE CoMPLETED BX PERSoNS DESIRING ro vo-19\r!ElLIFS.sllylc-E:,?J'l , bonno oR coMMtssloN FoR AUGUSTA, cEoRGlA NOTE:ANY INFORMATION ENTERED ON THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WOULD BECOME PUBLIC INFORMATION UPON YOUR SUBMISSION/APPOINTMENT. ****************************************************************************************************************************************t* EMAILADDRESS: fi\et{f r-octv-le { o^ ca)'nC a <'1 ''*t DATE: 1. ,/, REGTSTERED VOTER: YES t/ J No- vonNc DrsrRtcr *';, r f / MARITAL STATUS: SINGLE MARRIED 7. SEPAMTED - ENGAGED ----+X ""',ifu t rrd*b EDUCATION: HiGH SCHOOL o- - tJA trl /ltc***COLLEGE COUNTY: o,a / fur0 Ltt Ha MCE: WHITE AFRICAN-AMERICAN I/ ASIAN AMERICAN SPANISH SURNAMED AMERICAN INDIAN OTHER (SPCCIfY) LIST BOARDS YOU PRESENTLY SERVE ON: 1. 2. J. :lFt LIST ANY AREA IN WHICH YOU VEAPA ICULAR INTEREST OR EXPERTISE. 7z rsflL\ rt''tc Nc DATE oF BTRTH: ' - 7 -t 0 , SEX: MALE FEMALE i/''" ,9ll 3*')S BUS PHoNE: n! 'ul 12. -Ar {)c'' Rev. G2016 lL*rtn-l I TALENT BANK TNF'RMAT'N eu lrr{t#, DESIRING TO VOLUNTEERTHEIR SERVICES ON , BOARD ORCOMMISSION FORAUGUSTA, GEORGLA NOTE: A}.IY INFORMATION ENTERED ON THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WOULD BECOME PUBLIC INFORMATION UPON YOUR SUBM ISSIOI I/APPOINTMEI€. EMAIL ADDRESS: /h DArE: f\Z-Cl- ZClT 1. MME: HOME HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: STREET COUNTY nf - Ll - f I sEX: MALE FEMALE X STNGLE MARRTED-,Y sEeARATED HIGH SCHOOL COLLEGE RELATIVES WORKING FOR THE COUNTY:K, $r. Car. nou ,f<fiAea 3. 4. 5. 6. REGISTERED VOTER: VCS X ruq 4 7. 8. 9. VOTING DISTRICT MARITAL STATUS: EDUCATION: 10. MCE: WHITE AFRTcAN-AMERTcAN X ASnN AMERTcAN SPANISH SURNAMED AMERICAN INDIAN OTHER(specfi) LIST BOARDS YOU PRESENTLY SERVE ON: 1. N one 11. 2. 3. 12.LIST ANY AREA IN WHICH YOU HAVE A PARTICUI.AR INTEREST OR EXPERTISE e Rev. G2016 Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM District 6 Appointment Department: Department: Caption:Motion to approve the appointment of Ms. Monica R. Mack to the Citizens Small Business Advisory Board representing District 6. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo User Task I Laserfiche Forms User Task CLERK - C-A.8. Appliction 7647: Anonymous User Assitned to: Lena Bonner Title FiBt Narer Middh tlaml lrst N.rer Suffix Drte of Biror * Addresc* Dateassignedlll:39AM Duedate: None Priority: None ,1//GEORGIA Clerk of Commission Comrission, Authorities, & Boads Tal€nl Bank Apptietion lM6, -----E lMoni€ lRenee ,Mack lN/A [1/r4lirs5 f F23 KEMP DR Saw draft Page I of2 O HideDetaib I civ Sbl6/ProiE/Rqis IAUGUSTA peorgia p09093713 lunited States Hore Phoner Wori Phore Registered Voterr '70c726{394 I O Oislrict 1 O Distdcl 3 O District 5 O Distdcl 7 O None O Dist ict 2 O Distdci 4 O Distric{ 6 O District I M.rital Strtus r Educ.tion* Race * Genderr Occupaton' lnteest3 Commissions, Authorities, & Boards volunleerFor* @ t t ui€dty hv. rclatws wotory b rE Cily of A{& OYes @No t tcutr.dty ereronanA{e &ad, hmbbn, orffifty O Yes ONo lwodd liteto lek an.metcodm.tb dmyffia*n O Yes ONo lMamed lMasters lBrack lFemle trrrulti-Unil Managercnt pender equality, neighborhood prcsedation, @lmnity developmeDt and engagen lYl :J LYI g Emil Comrents lnackmniq@groit.@m f-s,*n--l http://1 0. I 0. 5.23 5/forms/form/approval/4 I 88 2ba0-2f6d-49B -9 I e6-da92d7 ee2tfl 21912017 User Task I Laserfiche Forms Page2 of2 Summary Action History Show Details ':' UserTask Viewing assigned to Lena Bonnet on2t9D017 11:39 AM ln protr6 ./ Message start Event completed by Anonymous Uset on 2n n017 1142 pM Y tubmit http://I0.10 .5.235lforms/form/approvall4l882ba0-2f6d-498-91e 6-da92d7ee2tf7 2/gl20l7 REGULAR MEETING MR. J. .BRIGHAII{: So move. ' MAYOR SCONYERS: Do we''have any deletions? " ,' ' j . MR. KUHLKE: . SECOhd. '' : MAYOR SCONYERS: Who made the motion? CLERK: JerrY Brigham. COMMISSION CHAMBERS May L9, L997 Augusta-Richmond County Commissl?1--:ot'"ned at 2t07 p'rl' I Monday, May i,--iggl, the n6norabte Larry E. sconyers, Mayor, presiding. PRESENT:Hons'BeardrBrldgest.H'.Brlgham'J'Brigham' Handy, Kuhlke, 'p"r.ff , toOlr-ina'Z"iterberg, mernbers of Augusta- Richirond CountY Commission' ABSENT: Hon. W. H. Mays, member of Augusta.Rlchmond County Commission. AIso present were Lena Bonner, Clerk of Commission; Randy Ollver, Admlnl"[i"i"t; and .fimes g. Y{aIl, Augusta-Richmond Count'y AttorneY. MAYoRscoNYERs:Goodafternoon,ladiesandgentlemen. Welcome to the Regular Meeting of the-Augusta-Richmond County Commission. We're going to hive the Inv5cation this afternoon by Reverend E.T. Martin, Pastorl-of :'tn" Springf itlg Baptist Church' and if you,rr iemain'standing ,.'I1 hive the pledge of Allegiance to the FIag. THEINvocATIoNIsGIVENBYTHEREVERENDMARTIN. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IS RECITED' MAYOR SCONYERS: Do we have any additions or deletions' Ms' Bonner? CLERK:Yes,sir.Mr.MayorandCommission,wehavea request ror one-addendum item: To approve the transfers within the Recreation and Park special Purpose Local Option sales Tax Phase III renovation accounts in the amount of $988,000 to increase tn"'-pt"iiminary Uuatet for the Aquatics Natatorium to $4.1 million ind to appiove 5 contract foi professional services contract with virgo .;-d Gambirl in the amount of $229,000 f or the pr"j".t ana ippi"i" fj.Ilng of- appl,fcation with FAA for construction 'ot f acility it tne- lite on Damascus Road' I l, !qr CLERK: Second readlng: A motlon to approve amendlng the .iRlchmond County Code Sections 7-4-L2, 't-4-L3, 7-4-L4 and 15 to Y provide for editorial revlsions. MR. ZETTERBERG: So move. MR. HANDY: SECONd. MR. TODD: Mr. Mayor? MAYOR SCONYERS: Motion by Mr. Zetterberg, seconded by Mr. Handy. Discussion, gentlemen? MR. TODD: Yes. Mr. County Attorney, what does the -- MR. WALL: ff I can steal a phrase from Mr. Patty, I guess my secretary got overly enthusiastic wlth the delete button and several paragraphs got omltted, and this simply puts them backin. MR. TODD: Yes, and what were those paragraphs? MR. WALL;-- A better-part of the'ordinance. All of Subparagraph C on 7-4-L2, all of Subparagraphs L, 2, 3, and 4 were deleted -- [End of Tape 1] CLERK: Go ahead. MR. WALL: -- Paragraphs 1 through 4 were deleted. On7-4-L4, the same thing, Paragraphs 1 through 5 or Subparagraph A brere deleted. And I don't know what happened, but they vreredeleted when the code was adopted in the flnal version. MR. TODD: Thank your Mr. Mayor. No further dlscusslon. MAYOR SCONYERS: FurLher dlscussion now, gentlemen? Is everybody satisfied? AII ln favor of Mr. Zetterberg's motlon to approve, 1et it be known by raising your hand, please. MOTION CARRIES 9-0. MAYOR SCONYERS z 64, please? CLERK: Mr. Todd and Mr. Handy would like to offer thefollowing as nominees for appoLntment. Mr. TODD: To the Human Relatlons Commlsslon, Ms. Nadlne Horne. Mr. HANDY: Animal Control, Lester EarI Thompson;Aviation-Bush Field, ME. Frederick BenJamln; Aviation-DanielFleld, BeIIe Clarke; Hlstoric Preservation, Annie Powelll HumanRelations Commission, Reverend Larry Fryer; Trustee Board, ClaraHornsby; Personnel Board, Dr. Velma Curtis; Plannlng Commission, Thelma Mack; Riverfront Development, Bonnie Rueben; Treecommission, Roy simpkins; Housing and Neighborhood Deveropment,George Cunningham. MR..l TODD: Mr. Mayorr,, I so move thnt,,rye approve.,,,!1,!,, MR. HANDY: Second. MAYOR scoNYERs: Motion by Mr. Todd, seconded by Mr. Handy.Discussion, gentlemen? MR. TODD: Yes, Mf,. Mayor. Mr. Mayor, I,d like to point outthat Ms. Nadine Horne don't rive ln District 4, r believe sherlves ln District 3, but certalnly Ms. Horne has done a good jobon the Human Reratlons board the approximatery two years thatshe's been there. And r don't have a great deal of interest inDistrict 4 to serve, and r berieve that this wourd be the onryNative American and female on the board unless there was anotherfemale appointed today. And where there,s no requirement thatthere be femares, that it's Just, r guess, the criteria set up bylaw as a minority-majority communlty, r t,hlnk this adds to thltboard. And we had a Natlve Amerlcan issue severar years agodurlng.Lock"and Ham Jam, -and Ms; -Horne-vras-appointea to try toavold those kind of issues. Thank you. MAYOR SCONYERS: Any other discussion or comments,gentl,emen? AIl in favor of the motion to approve, Iet it beknown by ralsing your hand, please. MOTION CARRIES 9-0. CLERK: 64-A is the communLcation from the Attorneyregarding the coliseum Authority appolntments, along with theAdministrator. MR. WALL: r don't know whether a corrected sheet has beendlstributed to you or not. Let me point out one thing insofar asrtem 54 is concerned. The terms for the two regislatlveappointments expires in the Year 2000, March of-2000 rather than2001. Also, on the second page, again, those appolntments wourdexpire in the Year 2000, with the exception of one position whichwill expire in March of '98. The other terms that expire in 1998are odd number districts and, therefore, r'm recommenaing thatthe appointment for District z be the one that wourd expire inMarch of '98, so you wourd be firrtng an unexplred term in thatone appointment. r,'ve spoken to Mr. Jerry Brigham about that.The other people wourd remain on there. ttrs. Blackwoodwourd remain as the appointment representing -- and she would befrom District 3; Bonnie Rueben, oistrict 1; -Jordan wrlght, Dls-trict 5. The regislatlve appointments, r put down the-dlstrictsthat they live in just for informational purposes. And theunrepresent,ed districts will be 2, 4, 6, and g for the terms toexplre March of 2000, and District z wourd expire in March of'98. l lt', 335 MR. TODD: Mr. Mayor? MAYOR SCONYERS: Mr. TOdd? MR. TODD: Mr. Wall, are you saylng there wouldn't be an appolntment for District 4 until the year -- MR. WALL: It ls a vacant posltion that would be appolnted, and what I -- Mr. Ollver had clrculated a memo recommendlng that even though the appolntments for the Collseum Authorlty are to be made by the body as a whole, that since there were elghtdistrlcts or eight, appointments, with the exception of thesuper dlstricts, each one of the Commlssloners repreaentlng asingle distrlct would make an appointment for that district or suggest a name for the full Commisslon to ratlfy. My understanding is that the two Commissioners representing the super dlstricts have consented to that. I've not spoken dlrectlywlth elther Mr. Mays or Mr. Kuhlke, but I've been told that theywere in agreement. So the idea is that the Commissioners fromDistricts 2, 4,61 7, and 8 would suggest names and then the Commission as a whole would approve those. MR. TODD: Thank you. MR. BEARD: Mr. Wallr drn I to understand -- or am f correctthat the Bill does certlfy that these indivlduals appointed should reslde in that dlstrlct or be appolnted from thatdistrict? MR. WALL: I'm somy, I may have to get you to clarify this.This ls a non-Section 13 MR. BEARD: I'm talking about the appointments from as faras the Bill states. Does it state that they are supposed toreside in that district if we make these appolntments? Forexample, if someone makes the appolntment from whatever dlstrict,if the Commission makes t,hat appointment, Is it true the BlIlcalls that that person should reside in that district or what? MR. WALL: Well, the answer -- short ans!iler to that questionis nor because I think we're confuslng two things. First of aII,t,hts is a board or authorlty that is not directly affected by theConsolidation Bill because it --the Coliseum Authority ls createdby a separate act. That act called for four City Councllappolntees, four County Commission appolntees. Obviously nowwith consolidatLon there are eight appolntments to be made by theConsolidated Government. It does not call since this BilIthe Coliseum Authorlty legislatlon stands on its own and it doesnot require that they Ilve ln a speclflc dlstrlct. MR. BEARD: So you're saying authorities appointees can come from anlnehere within the city? MR. WALL: That's correct. MR. BEARD: But the others would have to live in thatdistrict lf they are MR. WALL: If they live in a Section 13 excuse me, ifthey are represent,ing a board or authority that is affected bySectlon 13 of the Consolldatlon B11I, the ldea ls that they wouldlive in that distrlct. But the Bill does not compel t.hem to livein that distrlct. Just as Mr. Todd has pointed out with regardto Nadine Horne, he has recognized that, you know, in thatslt,uation and has suggested that someone who does not live inthat distrlct be appotnted to fill his positlon from Dlstrict 4.So lt doesn't require that, it says so that each district isrepresented. But those are Section 13 boards and authorities,t,he Coliseum Authority falls outside of that. MR. BEARD: Just wanted a clarlficatlon. MR. TODD: Yes. And, Mr. Mayor, when we're getting intoclarifications, ME. Wall, what do the Bill say in the sense that we don't get in trouble with the minorlty-maJority communlty. Wou1d Ms. Nadine Horne quallfy as a mlnorlty as a NativeAmerican? I know we've already took that action, but I thinkthat it may be important -to clear that'-up;' -And maybe you canbring that back to us at a later date, and if we need to make a'correction, then we wl11. MR. WALL: Okay. f mean, the she was appointed to the Human Relations Commission, I believe; is that correct? MR. TODD: Yesr Ers a minority member. MR. WALL: And the Human Relations Commission is supposedbe brought -- made up of representatives from various segmentsthe community, and Native Amerlcan is one of the categories torepresented. MR. TODD: Thank you. ! toof be MAYOR SCONYERS:do we, Jim? We don't need to vote on that or anythirg, i MR. WALL: Not unless someone wants to brlng forward a name. that we ,receive it asMR. TODD: Mr. Mayor, I moveinformation. MAYOR SCONYERS: Thank your Mr. Todd. MR. WALL: Mr. Mayor, I would polnt out, one of the reasonsthat r^re were requested to put this on the agenda for today is thefact that even though t,he authority members serve until asuccessor is appointed, apparently they are having difflcultyhaving a quorum at thelr meetings-becaus6 some of those whoseterms have expired are no longer attending, so there is some need ,''< - PROVTSIONS OF COTISOI.IDATTON BILL section 13 (f) of the consolidation birl provides that:"I*":F! as provided by this Act.or prohiuit"J uy d;'general lawsof this state, the membership 6r all r""ias, commissions,committees, panels, authorities 6r other_entities appointed by theBoard of commissioners of Richmond county o,'i.n" governingauthority of the city of Augusta shall be ir,"rti=J'-t'icreating'two new nernbers for each who shal1 be reconmended by theRj'chnond county- Delegation in the eeneiir e=="nb1y of Georgia andappointed by the comnission-council estabrisn"a 'uy- trri.s Act inaccordance with the existing laws or ordinances for the appointurentof members to such entities . the cornmission-council shal1identify those -b9ard9, panels, authori-tiesr or other entities thememberslrip of which is not comp_rised of p"r=or= who reside in eachcommission-councd-l oistrict arid shal1 p.tpo=" a pran for each suchboard, commission, or entity to "*p"rr&-o, contract the number ofmembers thereof so that as^- soon ; fracticar,- -""tr, such entitysha1I consist of one member from each ctmmission-councir Dj-strict. rl ENIITIES COVERED The following Boards, commissions, committees, panels,authorities and entities of'nichmond c"unty which .i" covered bythe foregoing provision of the consolidatidn till; --: 1. ADVTSORY BOARD FOR TUE DTSADVNITAGED2. ANTUAI, CONAROL ADVISORY BOERD - BTCEUOND COI'}flrY3. AVIATTON COUUISSION _ CrTy (Bu8E FrErrD)4 - AVrArroN coutrrssroN - esxnRAr (oNrrui irgLp)5. TEE IUGUSTA-RTCEUOilD COUNIY BOERD OF ZONING APPEJAI.S6. TEE AUGI'8TA.RTCE}IOITD COUUTY BEJAUTIFTCATTON-CIJEJLII' col{tluNrrY couurSSroN7. :TEE AUGUSTA-RTCEUOND COUN':TY COITVENETON I|IID VTSITORSBURE:AU8. lEE RrCE}IOITD COTNflTY DAI{GEROUS DOG COIIIROL BOARD9. EISTORIC PRESERVIIION COUI{IASION - CrTY OF AUGI'ATA10. ExaroRrq PREsERvArroil cour{rsgror - Ri;nl6iID cot tmy11. Eut{}lr RELAtroNS COU}Ir88rONL-2' IEE' BoIRD otr lRus-r-iit-o;- TEE AueustA-Rrcn{ouD couutyPI'BIJTC EIBRARY'13. pEnsotfNEL BOenD1{. pralrritxe . cotl}IrssloN15. RTVERFRONT DEYELOPITENtr REI7IEI, BOA^R,D16. TnEE CotAltdSrofu E!flTITIE8 COVERED 1. aDVISORY B9ARD trOR TEE DISAI)VATTIjAGED a. Creation. unknown at this tiure. Listed in compilation of alltrcommissions, Authorities and Appointrnents" of citytf Augusta. rninvestigating this board, we vrere only able to locite a tro-ay calledt'Th" . l,Iayor's Cornmittee for the Enployrnent of eeople withDisabilitiesr'. We assume it is the same entity. b. Statement of Purpose. Unknown at this tiure. c. Appointments. The list referenced above states that there are tobe 17 members of this Board. d. Membership. The following is a list of the menbers of theMayor's Committee for the Enplolment of Peotrrle with Disabili,tiesand their respective terms of office and dislricts: NAME Doyle Stewart Evelyn Ethridge Karen Howard Don Metz Jean TrenteseauGloria IrelandCharlene SizemoreLarry McCordLouise SkalkoMike CoxPhyliss CalhounBill AmmersonEd Catchings TER!,T OF OFFTCE N/a* ) N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A we have been unable lhus far to locate anyone with thisinfornation. rt will be provided by supprement once we obtainir. prsTBrcT 2 CoI. Co.N. Aug. 2 3 2Col. Co. 3CoI. Co. 7 7 1 2. ATIII{AI CONTROL ADVISORY BOARD - RICEITOND COT'ISEY a. Creation unxnoJo at this time. b. Statement of PurPose. The purpose of this board is to discuss reconmendations to benefit the health of animals. This board alsois to help with renovations to the animal shelter. c. Appointments. Unknown at this tirne. d. Membership. The following is a list of the members of the Richmond County Animal Control Advisory Board and their respectiveterns of offi-ce and districts: NAME TERM OF OFFICE DISTRICT Dr. Gary Wilkes N/A 1 Mary Walker N/A 3Elfriede B. Baggs N/A 4Dr. Lamar T. Walker N/A 6 Carolyn Ann Marks N/A ,. 7 3. CrTY AVIATTON CQI{ltrssrON (BI,8E FrELD) a. Creation. This Cornmission is created pursuant to the City Codeof Augrusta, Section 2-188, which states that rrthere shall be aboard consisting of seven (7) members to be known as the cityaviation cornrnission. b. Statement of PurPose. ' Under Code section 2-193, the aviation comruission isto, among other things, tttake charge of all airfields now orherafter owned by the city,...tt, The mission of the city Aviation commission isstated to be to provide an attractive, a1i-w".tn"i-aiiport faciliiythat meets the needs of the traveling public. The'continuingdevelopment of both airside and landside infrastructure will err=ur6that business, leisure and general aviation needs arte met with nolocar tax. iurpact. Responsible fiscal pranning and appropriatepolicy guidance by the Aviation Cornmiss j.on will provide- ior- thoseneeds well into the twenty-first century. c. Appointnents. According to Code section 2-Lgg, all members of theaviation commission are to be appointed by the Mayor for terms ofseven (7) years. rn case of a vacancyr dn appointment is to bemade for the remainder of that memberrs term. d. Menbership. The following is a list of the members of theAviation Commj-ssion for Bush Field and their respective terms ofoffice and districts: NAME TERM OF OFFICE George A. Sancken, Jr. Exp. LlL2/99Frank Dennis, Jr. Exp. L/L2199Charles B. Presley Exp. 2OOALewis A. Newman Exp. !/L1/2OOOEdward B. Skinner Exp. 2OO2Bernard Silverstein Exp. 20039I.P. Mayson Exp. L/t5/97Dr. I.E. Washington Exp. L9g7Reverend C.S. Hamilton (ex officio) ,'1t!',.,,-, \ DISTRTCT 3 7 3 3 ,-3 3 3 2 1 1. GENERITJ aVIATION COUUTSSION (DANTEL trIELD) a. Creation. This Cornmi5=ion is created by City Code section 2-195.1, which states that ttthere shal1 be a uoa-ra consisti"g "rseven (7) menbers to be known as the Genera1 Aviation Commissi-on.rt b. Statement of PurPose- This Commission is to rrtake charge of Dani.e1 Field and all other property incidental to the operatj.on of Daniel Field owned by the citY, . . . rr According to its mission statement, thi-s Commission is to coordinate with the Federal Aviation Adninistration, the Georgia Department of Transportation and Augusta-Richmond County in the ireas of safety, Federal and State grants, leases, revenue and all justifiable improvements to the airport. c. APPointments. The initial appointments to this commission were to be staggered from one to Seven years, then all for Seven years. all appointments are to be made by the Mayor, and any vacancy is to be fil1ed by appointment for the remainder of the term. Members should be residents of the county who have at least 10 years' business experience and have manifested some interest in the advancement of aviation. Sec. 2-196.2; 2-L96.5. The Mayor is an ex officio member, and all members serve without comPensation. Sec. 2-L96.3. d. MembershiP. The following is a list of the mernbers of the Aviation Commission for Oaniel Field and their respective terus of off ice and districts'. o. NAI,IE TERM OT OFFICE pTFTRICT Richard Burton ExP. Lll'4197 3 Frank Christian, Jr. ExP. L/L/98 3 Richard Isdell ExP- L/L4/2oo2 1 Robert Moore ExP. L|L4|2OOO 3 Marcie Wilhe1uri ExP. Ll L4 /99 7 Larry E. Sconyers (Mayor is ex-officio nember) Lee Beard (as CitY/CountY reP. ) ;. VACANT VACANT VACANT 6. TEE AUGUSTA-RICEUOND COUNTY BEJAT'TTFICAIION-CLEA}I COUUI'NITY COU}II8sION a. creation. This Commission is created pursuant to Richmond County Code Part II, Article III, Division 2.Section 2.29.L reads trThere is hereby created the Augusta-Richmond County Beautif ication-C1ean Community Commission. rr b. Statement of PurPose. The purpose of this Commission is to promote public interest in the general improvement of the environment of Augusta- Richmond County by various means. c. Appointments. This Commission is to consist of no more than twenty-four members, twelve of whom are to be appointed by the City Council and twelve of whom are to be appointed by the Board of Cornmissioners. Ex-officio members are to include the Mayor of thecity of Augusta, the Chairman of the Richmond County Board of Commissioners and the Presi-dent of the Chamber of Comrnerce of Greater Augusta. d. MembershiP. The following is a list of lhe members of the Augusta-Richmond County Beautification-C1ean Community Cornmission and their respective terms of office and districts: NAME Vernon Zi.nnermanJay KatzVicki Johnson Jean W. Rogers Joseph MooreCathy Lynn Black Fred Kennedy Gregory S. MasseyWillian M. Mitchell, Nelson RamsbotharnJoyce Stallings-Down Pamela P. Tucker TERM OF OFFTCE Exp. May,1996 Exp. Juner 1998 Exp. July, L997 Exp. July, L997Exp. May,1996Exp. May, .1998Exp. May,1998 Exp. May, 1998Jr. Exp. May, 1998 Exp. May,1998Exp. May,1998Exp. May, 1998 DTSTRICT 2 2 3 7 3 3 7 7 7I 4 5 Glenda Harrison Randy CanalMagnolia Donahue James Halpin Rob WatsonPaul FredrickJohn Polonus NAI{E Carolyn Usry Exp. May, L996Exp. May, 1998Exp. May, 1998Exp. May,1998Exp. May, L999Exp. May, 1998Exp. May, L999 7 3 7 3N. Aug. 3 1 7. AUGUSTA-RICE}TOTD COTIIflIY COIIVENTION AITD VrSrrORS BUREJAT] a. Creation. This Bureau _is .cleated by virtue of Richmond countycode, Part rr, chapter rr, Articre xrr. section z-t}t- states thalrrThere is hereby created the Augusta-Richnond. county Convention andVisitors Bureau.rf b. Statement of purpose. The.purposes of the Bureau include providing for theencouragement, solicitation, promotion, procurement and s-ervicingof conventions, conferences, seminars, special events, and th;development of tourism through the attraction of visitors toAugrusta and Richmond County. c. Appointments. The Bureau is to be comp6sed of seven membersappointed as folrows: one representing the city council ofAugrustai one from the Augusta Port Authority; two from the Board ofcommissioners (with different terms of orricel ,- one from thecoliseum Authorityr' one from.thg Georgia chapter of the GeorgiaHospitality and Travel Association; and one irom the Chamber ofComrnerce. d. Membership. The following is a list of the members of theAugusta-Richmond County Convention and Visitors Bureau and theirrespective terms of office and districts: TERM OF OFFICE Exp. t2/95 DTSTRICT 3 Lee Neel Exp. L2/96Harrell Tiller ExP. 12/95 Pat Blanchard Exp. L2196Michael Jones Exp. L2/95william Calhoun Exp. L2/97J. Pat Tirnmernan ExP. L2196 David Jones (ex officio) 3 3 3 3 3 3 Columbia Co. DTSTRICT 7 8 7 8. RICEUOND COT'NTY DA}IGEROU8 DOG CONTROL BOARD a. Creation. This board is created pursuant to the Richmond County Code, Part II, Sec. 4-4, which states that'rthere is herebycreated an animal control board...rr b. Statement of PurPose. The purpose of this board is to rrconduct hearings asrequired by O.C.G.A. S 4-8-24.n Sec. 4-4. c. Appointments. This board is to consist of three (3) members forinitial terms of one, two and three years and thereafter terms ofthree years. The Code section does not state who is to make theseappointments. It does designate the director of animal control asthe ttdog control officer'r for the county pllrsuant to the state's dangerous dog control act. Sec. 4-4 (a) . d. Membership. The following is a list of the members of the Richmond County Dangerous Dog Control Board and their respective terms of office and districts: NAI,IE Eleanore B. ShepherdLinda Workman Bragg Lynn Brown TERM OF OFFICE N/A N/A N/A 10 9. CITY OF AUGUSTA' GEORGIA EISTORIC PRESERVATfON COUI{ISSfON a. Creation This commission is created pursuant to Augusta cityordinance No. 5548, which states, in relevlnt part, that rthere ishereby created a commission whose title snatt be [The City ofAugusta, Georgia Historic preservation Commission. . . . rf b. Statement of purpose.' The purpose of the Commission is to "establish auniform procedure.for the protection, enhancement, and, perpetuationof places, districts, buirdings,, structures, objecti, iandscapefeatures and works of art having a historicil, cultural 6rarchitectural interest or vaIue. c. Appointnents. The. seven (7) members of this Board are appointed bythe Mayor and confirmed by the city council. A11 must be-residentiof the city of Augusta. Nominations are to be solicited from theBoard of Trustees of Historic Augrusta, rnc., from at-largereconmendations by the community. Members serve three (3) yeirterms. d. Membership. The following is a list qf the members of theHistoric Preservation Commission for the City. of Augusta and. theirrespective terms of office and districts: NAI{E TERM OF OFFTCE DISTRTCT Carl Drennon Exp. 4/5/94PauI Gonzalez Exp. 4/5/94Brian Halterman Exp. 3/L6/94Addie Powe11 Exp. 3/16/94Ross Snellings Exp. 3/L6/95Pat Blanchard Exp. 3/L6/95Isaac Johnson Exp. 3/L6/95Phillip waring (ex officio)Ex officio (formerly held by Christj-e Attaway) 3 3 4 2 3 3 L 5 11 10. TEE ETSTORTC PRESERVATION COI,IIIISSION OF RICEIIOND COT,I(TY,GEORGTA a. Creation. This commission is created by virtue of county codePart rr, chapter rr, Article xrrr. section z-2o3 stateJ thattrThere is hereby created a Commission whose title shall be ,TheHistoric Preservation Commission of Richmond County, Georqis/. r b. Statement of purpose. The purpose of the Commj.ssion is to nestablish auniform procedure for use in providing for the protection,enhancement, perpetuation and use of places, distriCts, sites,,buildings, structures, objects, landscape features, and works ofart having a special historical, cultural or esthetic interest orvalue, in accordance with the provisions of this article. "Section 2-201. c. Appointnents. The commission is to consist of five membersappointed by the Board of Cornmissioners of Richmond County.Members must be residents of the County and have demonstrated lninterest, experience or education in the area of history,architecture or Preservation of historic resources. ff possib16,at least three (3) nernbers should be professionals in architecture,architectural history, pranning, arc\aeology or relateddisciplines. Members serve three (3) year Lerrus ana may not servemore than two (2) consecutive terms. Initial appointhents werestaggered. Members may be reimbursed for expen-es but do notreceive a salary. (This Cornmission has not been very active forthe past three (3) years) d. Membership. The following is a list of the members of theHistoric Preservation Commission and their respective terms ofoffice: NAI{E Willian Dozier James CarterA1 Cheatham TERM OF OFFTCE Exp. t2/31,/9LExp. L2/3t/92Exp. 12/3J-/92 DTSTRICT 6 3 3 L2 Thomas RobertsonEric Montgomery Exp. L2/3L/e3Exp. 1-2/3]-193 11. EI'UAII RELAIIONS COUI{ISSION a. Creation. The Human Relations Commj-ssion is created pursuant to Richmond County Code, Part If, Article VIf and the Code of theCity of Augusta, Chapter II, Division 9. Section 2-53 of the Richnond County Code states that rrThere is hereby created a HumanRelations Commission for the County of Richmond, hereinafterreferred to as the Commission.tt Section 2-2LO of the City Codestates that rtThere is hereby created a Human Relations Commissionfor the City of Augusta and for the County of Richmond." Statement of Purpose. The purpose of the Commission includes studying problems of group relationships and promoting amicable relations among racial and cultural groups and eliminating whatever sourcesof j.nterracial friction may exist. c. Appointments. Section 2-54 of the Richrnond County Code providesthat the Commission is to be composed of eight members, four whiteand four bIack. The Richrnond County Codes does not state who isto appoint these members. The terms of office (after initialstaggering) are to be four (4) years. Section 2-21L of the City Code states that the Commission shal1 be composed of sixteen members, eight white andeight black. It also states that the Mayor of the City is toappoint four white and four black members, and that the Board of Cornmissioners of the County is to appoint four black and four white members. The terrn for members is three (3) years. Sec. 2-2L2. . d. Membership. The following is a list of the members of the HumanRelatj-ons Commission and their respective terms of office: 13 NAT,IE William R. Coleman, IfI Fredericka Flynt Hawthorne I. Lee, Sr. Joseph C. GoudY Nadi-ne Horne Addie Powel1 Sharon Childs Ca1dwe11 Fred A. Cheek TERM OF OFFICE nxp. LL/2/e4 ExP. tL/2/e4Exp.7Ll2/e4Exp. LL/2/e5Exp. Lt/2/e6Exp. tLl2/e6Exp. tL/2/97Exp. LL/2/e7 DISTRICT 7 3 3 3 3 2 4 6 L2. TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OT TEE ASGUSTA.RICEITOND COT]NTY PUBI,IC IJIBRARY a. Creation. This Board is created by the Richmond County Code, Part II, Article IV, Sec. 2-40, which states that the governing body for the Augusta-Richmond County Public Library shaI1 be a board of trustees. b. Statement of PurPose. The purpose of the Augusta-Richmond County Public Library is to offer a fu11 program of library service to all citizens of Richmond County to meet their informational, educational and recreational needs. t. c. Appointrnents. The Board of Trustees is to be composed of twelve uembers. One member is the imnediate past President of the Board of Trustees, one is appointed by the City Council, and ten are appointed by the Board of Commissioners of the County as follows: 1. two from the board of trustees of the Young Men's Library Assocation trust fund;2. one from the board of commissioners of Richnond CountY;3. two from the Friends of the Augusta Library;4. two from the Young Men's Library Association;5. one from the educational community (staff orfaculty of Augusta Co1lege, McG or Paine College) ; L4 one from the business community; andone at large The terms of office for members of this Board arethree (3) years, linited to two (2) successive terms. d. Membership. The following is a list of the members of theLibrary Board of Trustees and their respective terms of office anddistricts: NAME TERM OF OFFICE DISTRICT Dr. Mary-Kathleen Blanchard Exp. L998Juanita Burney-Hunt Exp. 1996Clarice Dukes Exp. 1998Melvin Ford Exp. 1996Dr. Laura Ann Grady Exp. 1998Mr. A. K. Hasan Exp. L997Dr. James Hudson Exp. 1995Ms. Nancy Hunter Exp. 1997Mrs. B. J. Lester Exp. 1998Willie Mays, IfI Exp. L996 John Mullins Exp. 1998Mrs. Mi11ie M. Parker Exp. L997 Stephen Shepard Exp. 1996 Samuel E. Tyson, Jt. Exp. 1998 13. PERSOITNEI, BOARD a. Creation. This Board is created pursuant to Richmond CountyCode, Part II, Chapter 13. Section 13-18 provides that: rtThere ishereby established by the governing authority of Richmond County aPersonnel Board composed of five citizens of the County of knowninterest in the improvement of public adninistration by inpartialselection of qualified and efficient personnel. b. Statement of Purpose. The purpose of the Personnel Board is to trrepresent the interest of the pubric in the improvenent of personneradministration and the selection of gualified personnel.rl 6. 7. 8 6 3 5 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 2 3 1 15 Section 13-20. c. Apoointments. The five members of the Personnel Board are to be appointed by the governing authority of the county. Members should have demonstrated interest in the Purpose of the board as stated above. Terms are for five (5) years. Members cannot have heldpolitical office or have been a salaried employee of the county during the 12 months preceding his appointrnent. d. MembershiP. The following is a list of the members of the Richmond County Personnel Board and their respective terms of office and district: NAME Brian J. MulherinCharles McCannCaroline Mitchell Owen Crickenberger VACANT TERMS OF OFFICE DTSTRICT 6/L4/e4 - 2/281e7 7 7 /2lel 2/28/e6 r-6/L4/e4 - 2/28/e7 4s/L6/e5 2/28/2OOO 7 L4. AUGUSTA-RICEUOITD COT'IITY PLAIINING COI{I{ISSION a. Creation. ,. This Comnission is created pursuant to Richmond County Code, Part fI, Article III, Division l and City of Augusta Ordinance No. 5156. Section 2-25 of the Rj.chmond County Codeprovides that rtThere is hereby created a joint City-County Planning Comnission with the membership, powers and duties as set forthherein. The Commission created herein shall be known as thetrAugrusta-Richmond County Planning Commissionrr. b. Statement of PurPose. The purpose of the Cornmission is to make careful and conprehensive surveys and studies of existing conditions andprobable future developments and to prePare such plans forphysical, social and economic arowth as will best promote public health, safety, morals, convenience, prosperity or the general welfare as well as effi-ciency and economy in the development in the L6 City of Aug:usta and Richmond County. c. APPointnents. This Jo*i==ion has ten members, four of whom were appointed by the City of Augusta (and must be city re.sidents) and four of whom were appointed by the Board of Commissioners of Richmond County (and must be county residents). After initial staggering, terms are for four (4) years. The Mayor of the City of auguita or his representative from the City Council, and the Chiirman of the Board of Commissioners of Richmond County, or his representative from the Board of Cornmissioners, are ex officio rnembers of this Commission, with voting Power. Sec. 2-26- d. MembershiP. The following is a }ist of the members of the Augusta-Richmond County Planning Commission and their respective terms of office and districts: NAME Jimmy Williamson Ed DickersonRev. C. S. Hamilton Bunnie Purvis Dan. P. MathenY Dennis Williams Thelma Mack Frank Knapp, III Rep. of Mayor (Margaret Rep. of CountY (Freddie TERM OF OFFICE DTSTRICT 15. RIVERFRONT DEVELOPUENT REVIEIT BOARD' a. Creation. This board was created by the city to oversee development in the PDR (Planned Development Rl.verfront) Zone. A discussion of this Board is found in Section 25-A of the Augusta- Richmond County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Exp. 1997 Exp. 1998Exp. L999Exp. f'eb, 1996Exp. L996Exp. l-995 (open) Exp. L997nxp. 1998 '' Armstronq) Exp. l-995Handy) Exp. 1995 3 New York- I 2 5 1 2 8- 3 1 7- L7 b. Statement of PurPose. The purpose of the Board is to review plans for development within the PDR zone and make recomnendations to the Planning Commission for proposed developments. c. Appointments. All rnerabers of this Board are appointed by the City Council and are to be selected as follows: i. one member of city Council;ii. one member of Planning Commission from those members appointed by city Council iiii. one member of the Augusta Port Authority;iv. One member of the Executive Committee ofHistoric Augustar'v. one member of Augusta Tomorrow; andvi. Two residents of the City of Augusta. There are also to be three ex officio mernbers: the Executive Director of the Augusta-Rj-chnond County Planning Commission; the Director of the Mayor's Office of Economic Developmentr. and the City Engineer. Members are to serve withoutpay and, except for the ex officio resident members, to serve a term coinciding with their term on the body from which they are appointed. d. Membership. O The following is a list of the members of the Riverfront Development Review Board and their respective terms ofoffice and districts: NAME TERM OF OFFICE DTSTRICT Charles A. DeVaney ExP. 1-2/3r./97 3 Frank Knapp, III ExP. 4/L/94 5Louis Battey Exp. 4/l/94 7Nick Dickinson Exp. 4/l/94 3 VACANT 18 16. RICEI,TOIID COI'NIY TREE COUUTSSION a. Creation. This Commission is created pursuant to the Richmond County Code, Part TT, Chapter 16.3. Section 15.3-3 states thattrThere is hereby created a Richmond County Tree Commj.ssion . tr b. Statement of PurPose. The purpose of the Conmission is to "Defineproblems, suggest solutions, and provide support; review any appeals or variances and recommend acceptance or rejection to theAdministrator; annually review the illustrated guide to iurplementing the Richmond County Tree Ordinance (IGo) and update it as needed; and review petitions for landruark trees.rr Section 16.3-3. c. Appointments. The Commission is to consist of eight members, allof whom are appointed by the Richmond County Board of Commissionersfor three (3) year terms (after initial staggering of terms). d. Membership. The following is a list of the rnembers of the Richmond County Tree Commission and their respective terms ofoffice and districts: . NAME Cathy BlackJackie BlanchardSid Mullins A1 CheathamTex MaxwellBill Franke Roger Davis Roy Simpkins TERM OF OFFTCE DISTRICT Exp.4/26195 CoI. Co.Exp. 4/26/e5 7Exp.4/26/e6 8Exp.4l2l6le6 3Exp.4/26/97 7Exp.4/26/97 3Exp.4/26/98 7Exp. 4/26/eB 7 19 EIITITIES NOT COVERED 1. AUGUSEA EO8PITE! AUTEORTIY This authority is exempt because it is created pursuant to ]ocal act (the Hospital Authorities Law at Ga. Laws L964, p. 499 et seq. ) Its rnembers are in the process of being appointed at this tine. 2.AUGUSTA EOUSING AUTEORITY This authorityIaw. Its nembers, theirfollows: NAME T. A1len Childs, Jt. Sidney SeidenbergAlberta Jasper James E. Carter, IIf Jackson K. Widener, Jr. is exempt becauseterms of office and TERM OF OFFICE Exp. 12/20/e7Exp. L2/20/2oooExp. t2/20/eBExp. t2/20/eeExp. L2/20/96 it, is created by statetheir di-stricts are as DISTRICT 3 3 2 3 3 1" bq**h b," P;a-t*"o q{4* T Lo "t2 q fl,*"cg,r42 Or fawtv'wf 3. AUGUSTA EOUSING REE.ABILITATION BOARD - AUGUSTA RESIDEIITTAI CARE FACILIIY FOR TEE ELDERLY AIITEORITY / This body is exempt because it is created by state law (O.C.c.A. S 37-7-t1O). Its members, their terms of offi-ce and their districts are as follows: TERM OF OFFICENAI,IE Ruth Crawford ExP. L997 Rick Toole ExP. L997 Remer Brinson ExP. L997 Jeanette Cummings ExP. 1995 Tom Robertson ExP. L995Dr. Justine Washington ExP. 1995 John Frank ExP. 1995 DISTRTCT 1 3 3 5 1 2Macon, GA 20 {. AUGUSTA PORT AT'TEORITY This arrgS6rrity is exempt because it is creatLd by IocaIact (Ga. Laws 1959, p. 276L). rts members, their terms of officeand their districts are as follows: NAII{E Richard TooleRay Chadwick Henry DaggatJack Barber Dr. CarI Nechtman Exp. 4/4/99 3Stovall Walker Exp. 9/t9193 LMrs. Jean P. Daniel Exp. 4/6/94 3 TERM OF OFFICE DISTRICT Exp. s/L7 /98 3Exp. 5/L7 le8 3 Exp.4/6/e5Exp. L/7 /e6 1 7John P. Timmerman Exp. 6/6/96 3Mrs. Virginia Fox Exp. t2/3L/96 1 5. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OT RICEUOND COUNTY PUBIJTC FACTLITIES This board is exempt because it is a private, non-profitcorporation. 6. BOARD OA EIIECTIONS This board is exempt because it i3 created by state 1aw.Its members, their terms of office and their districts are asfollows: NAi{E TERM OF OFFICE DTSTRTCT James M. Thomas Exp. 3/3L/97 6Richard Dyson Exp. 3/3t/99 8James M. Hinton, Jt. Exp. 3/31/97 1Aaron P. Battle Exp. 3/3L/97 8Charles C. Stebbins, III Exp. 3/3L/97 3 2L 7. BOARD OF EQUaT.TZATTON This board is exempt because it is created by state Law(o.c.G.A. s 48-5-31rJ. rts members, their terms of office andtheir districts are as follows: NAME Board #L: Alfred Rodd Ann Y. PendarvisE11is B. Ramsey Rosena C. Mi11erE1aine D. WongBetty Ann McKinney Board #22 Christopher CunningharnDiane G. GillianChristopher NaylorRicky E. SrnithMargaret E. BoardmanJordan L. Wright Board #3: James W. Green Nancy E. Owens TERM OF OFFICE DISTRICT Exp. L996 5Exp. L996 7Exp. 1996 7Exp. L997 (alternate) 4Exp. 1998 (alternate) 7Exp. L997 (alternate) L Exp. 1996 7Exp. L996 7Exp. L996 3Exp. 1998 (alternate) 5Exp. L997 (alternate) 7Exp. 1998 (alternate) 5 Exp. 1996Exp. L996 6 4 8. BOARD OF EE:AIJIE This board is exempt because(Ga. Laws 1931, p. 660). Its nembers,their districts are as follows: NAME TERM OF OFFTCE Jerry Brighan Exp. L2/31.195Kennth Echols Exp. t2/3t/96Edward H. Snith, Jr., MD Exp. L2/3L/96 it is created by loca1 acttheir terms of office and DISTRICT 7 7 7 22 Eugene Hunt ExP. L2/3L/96 John C. BeIl , Jr. ExP- L2/3t/94 Ronald W. Bowers, DDS ExP. L2/3L/98 Chery1 Newman, l{D ExP. l2l3l/97 Terrence Cook, MD ExP. l2/3L/97 Gerald W. Woods ExP. L2/3L/97 Frank M. Rumph, MD ExP. L2/3L/98 A bill was recently passed regardj-ng the makeup of the Board of Hea1th. Senate Bill 783 provides that the Board will be composed of the following members: 1. One member from the Augusta-Rj-chmond County Commission-Council appointed by such Commission- Council;2. The president of the Richrnond County Board of Education or his/her designee; 3. One member appointed by the Augusta-Richmond County Commission-Council from a list of three nominated by the Richrnond County Medical Society; 4. One member appointed by the Augusta-Richmond County Commission-Council from a list of three nominatedby the Stoney Medical, Dental & Pharmaceutical Association;5. One member appointed by the Augusta-Richmond County Commission-Council from a list of three nominated by the Augusta Dental SocietY;6. One member appointed by the Augusta-Rj-chmond County Commission-Council from a list of three nominated by the Tenth District of the Georgi-a Nurses Association; and7. Five members at large appointed by the Augusta- Rj-chnond County Commission-Council. Members of the Board as of February 1, 1996 are to serve out their terms of office, and then new appointments are to be made so that the requirements of the Bill are met as soon as possible. The respective terms of office of appointees under the Bill are set out in detail in the Bi11. . BOARD OF IAX ASSESSORS This board is exempt because it is created by local act. Its members, their terrns of office and their districts are as follows: 5 3 3 7 3 3 4 23 NA},IE Bert T. Thomas James B. NorrisErnie Bowman Dona1d H. Skinner,Willian B. Lee Iv Tracy E. Willians TERM OF OFFTCE _ Exp. 4/24/e6Exp. 4/24/99Exp.4/24/e6Sr. Exp. 4/24/99Exp.4/24/e7Exp.4/24/97 DISTRICT it is created by localtheir terms of office DISTRICT DISTRICT 1I I 6 7 5 10. CAIIAI, AUTEORIIY This authoritY is exemPt because act (Ga. Laws 1989, p. 4750). Its members, and their districts are as follows: NAI,IE Thomas H. Robertson Richard S. FoxJeanie C. AllenD. Hugh ConnollYRobert S. Woodhurst, III TERM OF OFFICE Expired It ll il ll 3 1 5 3 2 3 1 5 3 11. COLISEI'U AT'EEORITY This authority is exempt because,it is created by local act (ca. Laws L9'73, p. 3042). fts menbers, their terms of office and their districts are as follows: TERM OF OFFICE Citv Appointees W.C. Calhoun ExP.3129/97 Thomasina Ketch ExP. 3/29197 Dick Frank ExP. 8lt6l87 Mrs. B.J. Blackwood ExP. 8/L6/97 Countv Appointees Henry Ingram Bonnie RubenJordan Wright Exp. 3/L997Exp. 3/L998Exp. 3/L998 5 1 5 24 Williarn Holden, Jr. ExP . 3 / L997 Legistative Appointeqe Ernie Bowman ExP. 3/L998 Joe L. Scott, Jr. ExP. 3/L998 Owen Crickenberger ExP. 311-998Brian Howard ExP. 3/L998 L2. CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJI'STUENTS A}ID APPEAIJS This board is exempt because it is an internal board made up of employees of Richmond County. 8 5 7 1 13. CSRA REGIONAI, This board is(o.c.G.A. s so-8-32). Joyce BlevinsJohnnie BrownJacquelyn DecellPhillip Boatwright Hon. James BuckleY Hon. Martin Dolin Charles Bragg Roderick CanpbellWillian Edwards Henry Brighan Roy ChalkerPete BrodieMarvin CollinsAlfred ConnollY Horace Danie1Hon. Willian Evans Hon. Robert Fields Frank GordY Hon. llark Greene . Lee Griffin George Grimaud Donald HaganDr. AlcYe HawesHon. SandY HersheYBetty Hill DEVEI,OPI,TENT CENIER exempt because it is created by state lawIts members are: 25 James Hinton Gardner Hobbs ceorge HughesMr. F. Jenkins Bobby Johnson Hon. Dona1d Kent Hon. Robert Knox Herman Lodge Hon. Horace l{athis Hon. Mike McConbs Alford McKenzie Jesse MitchellWalker Norman Jack PatrickHon. Ed Ricketson Rosa RobertsRiley StarneY Hon. Frank Thomas Gene Trotter Hon. Dennis Trudeau Joe UsryHon. Julian Veatch Charles WareHollis Winn TERM OF OFFICE James Kendrick 9lLSl92 6/30/97 Wilson Rice 8lL6le4 6l3olee Louise Vallotton 7 /LL/95 - 6130/2OOO D. Hugh ConnollY 9/.L5192 6/30/96 James Hinton 7 /L3/93 6/30/98 14. DEPE. CEILDREN AIID FN'IIIJY SERVICES BOARD This board is exempt because it is created by state law (O.C.G.A. S 49-3-1). Its meribers, their tefms of office and their districts are as follor*s: DTSTRICT 1 7 3 3 1 Thislaw (O.c.G.A. Stheir districts 1s. DoWNTOWN DEXTEtOPUENT AUTEORITY ,r/ authority is exeurPt because it 36-42'4). Its members, their are as follows: is created bY state terms of office and 26 15. EOUAE BILL 1OO REGIONAIT BOaRD Thisboardisexemptbecause.itiscreatedbystatelaw (House BilI rOOl .-- ft=_T".*.- consist of appointees from Burke' McDuffie, coiiini", --nict'nona' Emanuel, Glascock, Jefferson, Screven, .fenfii=l-t"fi"f.rio, iincoln, Warren and Wilkes County' The memb"r= "pioLt[;;-RiEnmona County, their terms of office and ineir districEs are as forlows: NAI,IE TERM OF OFFICE James Kendrick ExP' 7 /96 iiv"rrr" Gold ExP' 1/eg r.ll,r. shireY ExP ' 7 le6 C. - f,",f"une Hickson ExP' 7 196 L?. II{DLBIRIAL DE|VELOPT'IENE AUmORItry NA},TE Willian Calhoun Hugh ConnollY H.I'{. Osteen Thomas Owens James Hines Robert KirbYEvita Paschall TERM OF OFFICE Exp. LolL9l99ixp. 8l3le7 Exp. L2lL8/e5 Exp. sl3/97 ExP. L2/L8/95Exp. LO/6lee ExP. LolLelee DISTRICT 3 3 3 3 movedCol. Co. 6CoI. Co. DISTRICT 1 3 3 5 DISTRICT 3 7 4 3 3 7 Thj-s authority is exempt because it ].aw (o.c.G.A. -S- io-ez-ai ' - Its menbers' their [n"ir districts are as follows: NAI,IE TERM OF OFFICE Marshall Brown 4-25-89 L2-t3-94 il;fi;-c=i"" s'7 -e3 L2-L3-e4 w;it;= HornsbY 5-2-8e 1-2-L3-e4 H. U. Osteen - 5-2-89 L2-L3-94 ii"=i"ri-ri11er Lz-L4-eo- L2-L3-e6 cirartes O. Walker 11-1-94 L2-L3-96 VACANCY terms of office and 27 18. RICE}IOITD COI'IITY EOSPITAI' AUEEORITY Thisauthorityisexerrptbecauseitiscreatedbylocalact (the no=pitJr--e"-fn-"Jiti;s Law at Ga' Laws L964' p' 499 et seq') Its members, their terms "i &ti." and their districts are as follows: NAME TERM OF OFFICE ^ts Quincy L. Robertson Exp' L?/.1Lle6 V;:.e:'Plwell ExP' L2/3L/e6'/ rnor"= n.-iiir"y, Jt', l{D sxPl ^\?L3t/97James W. Srnith, Jt' ExP' 'zl1tl97william E- Johnson ExP' l2l3L/98 Brian J. Marks ExP' L2/.3^L/98 nandolpfr n. Smith, MD Exp' L2/3-L/99 warren A. Daniel ExP' tz/.1L/99 Gerald E. lt"tn"i= ExP' L2l3Ll99 19. EATEIY REVIEI9 BOARD DISTRICT 2 I 3I 7 7 3 3 3 AUGUSEA AIID IEE CSRA, it is a nonProfitof office and their DISTRICT 7 This board is exempt because it is an internal body of Augusta-nichnond County, and its members are employees' 20. 8EIIIOR CITIZENS COI'NCII.,'OF GREAIIER GEORGIA, INC' This council is exemPt becausL corporation- Its members, their terms districts are as follows: NAIITE TERM OF OFFICE D. Douglas Barnard, Jt' ExP' 1??9 ;irb;i; BeasleY ExP' L??7 ;Agy Belser - ExP' 1??! i"'iI'= u. Elactcstone rrr ExP' 1??q !{=;. FloYd S. Bliven ExP' L997 t"rw aoltes ExP' L9?1 ivanlv clrter, P.c' ExP' L991 R;;;;t colrins ExP' \e29iiii"ri"" cook ExP' LeeT Charles A- Devaney ExP' 1??9 iaqnofia Donahue ExP' 1??9 ;;i--iia-serald ExP' LeeT 28 Col. Co.I 7 7 7 3I 7 3 7 3 ,\l-'.* Ia George H. Foster EIIen Goldberg Reverend J.R. HatneY Dr. James l{. Hi-nton, Jr' Susan W. Mohr Brian J. Mulherin, Sr' John M. MutlinsI{rs. JosePh J. Rogers TerrY Sarns Reveiend S.J- Shuford Ernestine H. ThomPson Dr. I.E. Washinqton Mrs. Solomon Williams Uittie Pedraza NAUE Carey MartinEarI Rhodes Carmie BrYant Thomas PerrY Richard Muns TERM OF OFFICE 8/2/e3 5/3tle6 8l2le3 - 5/3Lle66lL4le4 5l3Lte5 Ll 41e5 - 5l3lle6 j6/Lle5 5/3Lle8 DISTRICT it is now inactive- Exp. L998Exp. L997 Exp. 1998 Exp.1998Exp. L997Exp. L997Exp. L997Exp. 1997Exp. 1998 Exp.1998ExP. 1997 Exp. L997 Exp.1998 N/A CoI. Co. J 1 1N. Aug. 7 3 7N. Aug. 7 3 2 2 7 2L SEERIFF'g ITERII EYSTEI'I REVIET BOAND This board is exempt because it is created by locaI act (ca. Laws Lg8;, p- 261.9;. leai, p' 5o7o) '- Its members' their terms Jt orfi"e and trreir districts are as follows: 6 6I 2 7 22.8IIADII'IT AUtrEORITY This authority is exemPt because 21. IRENSPORTATION AT'TEORITT This authoritY is exemPt because (ca. Laws 1970, P. 3208) ' it is created bY Iocal 29 REGULAR MEETiNG COMMISSION CHAMBERS March 18, 1997 Augusta-Richmond County Commission convened at 2:05 p. m., Tuesday, March 18, 1997, the Honorable Larry E. Sconyers, Mayor, preslding. PRESENT: Beard, Bridges, I{. Brigham, J. Brigham, Ilandy, Kuhlke, Mays, Powel1, Todd and Zetlerberg, members of Augusta- Richmond County Commj.ssion. Also present were Lena Bonner, Clerk of Commissioni Randy 01iver, Administratori and James B. l{al1, Augusta-Richmond County Attorney. MAY0R SCOMERS: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. l{elcome to the Regular Meeting of the Augusta-Richmond County Commission. We're going to have the Invocation by the Reverend Claude L. Harris, Sr., Pastor of the New Life Church of God in Christ, and if you'11 remain standing wc'11 have the Plcdge of Allegiancc to our f1ag. THE ]NVOCATION lryAS GIVEN BY THE REVEREND HARRIS. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE tryAS RECITED. MAYOR SC0MERS: Thank you, Reverend Harris. Ms. Bonner, do we have any additions or deletions? CLERK: Yes, sir, Mr. Mayor and Commission. l{e have a request Lo delete Ilem 34, appointment of Public Works Director. Additions to the agenda: Lo authorize a lease agreement with A11tel Mobile for a cellular phone antennae and equipment at Hiehland Avenue l{ater Tank; two, a motion to approve the policy for appointments to boards, commissions and authoritiesi three, a motion to approve the reappointment of Mr. William B. Lee IV to a new four- year term on the Board of Tax Assessors, 23rd Senatorial Districtl four, a motion to approve the reappointment of Mr. Tracy Williams to a new four-year term on the Board of Assessors, 22nd Senatorial Districti and five, a motion to approve contractual services between Augusta-Richmond County and the Marchof Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. MAYOR SCOIIYERS: l{hat's your pleasure, gentlemen? MR. T0DD: il4r. Mayor? MAYOR SC0NYERS: Mr. Todd? MR. T0DD: With the exception of deleting Number 34, I'd like to changeit to discuss, and make a motion that we do the others unanimous. And the rcason is that I think that wc nccd to makc a dccision whethcr wc're going to re-advertise or not or what direction we're going from this point. MAYOR SCOMERS: Do I hear a second to Mr. Todd's motion? MR. P0I{ELL: I'11 second Mr. Todd's motion. -> MR. 0LIVER: Letter? MR. LLOYD: yes. MR. 0LIVER: we'11 do a letter of endorsement for you. I have astandard form for that. And if you give ;; t;;;-grant applicaiion, or a copyof.it, if vou just get to my office i "opy oi;[";;-r'-rr'ir";;;;"; letter ofendorsement and I'11 send ii to the Mayoi'.-orii"u'for him i;-;ic;. MR. LL0YD: Thank you. CLERK: Item 2 under the addendum agenda: Motion to approve the policyfor appointments to the boards, commissioils and authoritie;: -- - MAYOR SC0MERS: What's your pleasure, gentlemen? MR. TODD: Mr. Mayor, I so move. MR. KUHLKE: Second. MAY0R sc0MERSr^ Mglio! bv Mr. Todd, seconded by Mr. Kuhrke.Discussion, gentlemen? All in iavor of Mr. TodJ'-s motion, let it be known byraising your hand, please. MOTION CARRIES 9_0. [UN. POWELL OUT] CLERK: If we could take llgms 3 and 4 togelher. Item 3 is a motion Loapprove the reappoinlmenL of Mr. l{illiam B. Lee"IV to a new-forily"u, Lerm onthe Board of Tax Assessors ending 20Ol; 23rd Senatorial District. Four is toapprove the reappointment of Mr. Tracy E. Williams to a new four-year term onthe Board ending vear 2001; z}nd senatoriar nisiiict. MR. J. BRIGHAM: So move. MR. H. BRIGIIAM: Second. MAYOR SCONYERS: I have a motion by Mr. Brigham, seconded by Mr.Brigham. Discussion, gentlemen? nil in'favor-oi'ur. 'J"rrv niiehur;'r'motion,1et it be known by raiiing your hand, pl";;". - MOTION CARRIES 9_0. [UN. POWELL OUT] CLERK: Item 5 is a motion to approve contractual services betweenAugusta-Richmond County and the March Lr oir"" giitt Defecis-Foundatlon. MR. T0DD: Mr. Mayor? MAYoR SCoMERS: Mr. Todd? MR. T0DD: I'd like to make a motion that we participate in the walk-a-thon and become a supporter by doing in-kind se.ui""" such as making the busavailable that pick up the foiks 1i[e me ttut;"-too o1d and fai-ior walkine,and restrooms available at Julian Smith and at-the garuecu; Fii, -una otn", 1F17-1997 L?.?E lc[clDl EtEt TO:eolocsgIoNEnSeElnBlg itrttrrDyr oLFEn, rD!{IHlg!Rr!0R ilinr lla11EIOlir DATE I Harch 18,Irtarch 1?,(preparaEloa data) EIIBiIECI: .appoiatments Eo boards, cmnieeione, aad auEhorit,ies. GlD,itrolf: Itlotlou to-approve policy for al[nintmcnta to boards,comnrieeions, and authoiities. E}CEE,@ID: Section 13 (f) of the coneoudat.lon Act aad charterprovLdes tlrat: L997 L997 P.@/gE l$cen! _aa prorridcd by this Act or prohibiEed by rhegtncral l-aws of, thls-etlte, tt= uenuere1ip oI-arr udarag.cornmiaeiono, coruittcca,'p.nirc,- ttrihJirii.. or othcrentltiee _appointcd by tG goaia ra__cb,rrni;srorrcre ;ixrentrEnd soultv o-r g,!e grcnrrerning au-tlorlty of ths Ctty ofAugusEa . . -'- sharr - b-"_ -h;;ased by creatiug tuo ne*meubers for ea& wUo rUaff Uc-i:Hg:p,i-=t.1"" G irc"".-fr'ffi"Bii Y,.*.SffilSarrpor.usecl Dy rtre ccrlDiteioa-oountril cstlbllnhed 5y tt t"4ct Ln asco=daic. wtth the exiefrag-dt"";;'"=aiiaac"af:f- lUf atr[,olnrnent ot rncn&ciE to ruch entLtiesLrI4e coflrr[salou-couucLl gharl tdeattfrr thosc boards-paaelB, autbml.ties, or o.ber .otl-t-i"" tf,= ;;d-"_;i;;iwhieh ls Dot .o*piiaea-oipu""o* who reside in eachcomnlEeLoa-couscil- Dr.grriei .ira snarr -;;p;; a praa foreaeh sueh boatrd, egnuai-eton, or catity to a:paud orcoutract the nr:rnber of nrcmbero cuereoE-;;'tha; il' soon aspractical, each auch entiry "t.ir Ll"ir"r-6"i *" rneuber wt?-tw? 6:lPt'l P.@. mR-1?-1997 L?t@ from "*aL Conurieeioa-Corrncil otstrlcE., rhe eatitice that a:re covered by Ehie provision of thcconsolidation AcE for nhom apporninJn[i are crr:nrently teiogpro;rosed are Eha folloniog; Inioa1 Control BoardAviation Com.issioo _ City (Bush Field)aviation cotilrlssioE __ccrr3rit in*i"i-i,ield)Boand of Zoning AppealsHistoric preeerrraElon conmLsgioaIft:nan Relatlons Comfti.ssionBoard of Tnrsteee of the a*gu'ta-Rlch*ond countyPublic Iribrarypersonael BoardPlanning Cormj.ssionRiverfront Dcvelopment Revies BoardTrcc Corfinigeion ll[llrIEllti: rt le protrlosed that thc for.rouing polisy be imprcmented!:.ttk3- apPo-lnEalenEs to theee Sectioo I3iE) boards, counrLaaione,anc autboritieg, to-wit: No si'ting meraler of any board or co'miaar.on chau havchis term endecomp'reEe.u.-ilL3"Tf#'f; if '.."*tTIJ.*1":,ffi =r#mrltiple districts wour.d ue -asirgna-i; represetrts an All ordi'ances creating these board,s ",ill be amcnded ag =eccsGaz? to proviie. for { year termr after tue rnrEraralpoiatrnents arc frha'eed in.' Terang wtll be etaggcred auch tbat the board. appolntnentfor g partlcurg alitrtct coirespods to the rerm of thecommlasioner elecred for inai aiilEci: -- lerns for board -mnbere be estabriehed Euch that thewurpire on rr{arch =11_ _1r tu" -"pir-io.riJ;+;;.[li'"!ilii elected cormlssioEers would'bave tue'iirel- so days toconeider rhe ap5nintmJaG- frorn- [i; ai"Gicr to rherrarlous boarde - Er of:ficio meubers from tbe ccmniesLql voutd IEo -E-be -avr"Ilon c"r*r"ErLa (Bueh rierd.) , lLHS::i P.WlE *1?-797 6:1$t'r P.EI I'F17-1997 t?2LA Aviatiou coramissr'on-lDary-gr -rie,-d), lhe A*grusta-Rr-chnondCounty hrblic r,Ibrary, ""e .oe -p*n'ing Conuissloa. ?hesemembers would be aon_vot-fng -ilrobeis, and _rculCl be:BHiiiEl.r"T ";;;"j";i;E. *"r.rilren___,,,,A" rhe ' There nrrr be no t"T l.r*i*.cstablrehed for meubers ofthe varl.ous uoarau, u"trr.iitrEi,La cormLsslons -o There-tr,st be a-tarent pagt form iscluded la the agendabook, -11_?Td9r rJi- an .odr"tili 'to - b" consl.dered forappsitrEmenr ro sueh a Uoiia.--ciil,fssf"d, ;;-";:i;riry. ' ongorag ade will be ?taced^ ia the dar.ly nerrapapcrB forsuboicsion of talJat -b.of ?o*ri"-...= Appoint'meat's t'o - tbesa boarde- and eon*iEsiona ri1l beaccompliehed bry AIrrit 3t-;9;G. P.U/6 AI*)olntnents to orher than.sectl-on r3(f), boar& wirl be made by:Hr:ffi:r*."""i rfi# q,,i;kit is- iilsEibre. rneee boards ani Augusca Hoepital AuchorltwAugnraua uouiing a"-iuoif ii,T*iE"i!ii'l3.li#ilii;.1:l iffi"fu":irff irror* yluSusta-pg5t Authorit b.d B:S, :f Ei:::rois-oi-nichnpnd counry public Fasttlrles Board of EealthBoarf of Tax AssesaorgC-naI AuthorityColieeuu authoiitvDeparturn_t Childrin. -nd I"n+Iy SerrrLceg BoardDom.t o.*rr_ Developncot ArttroritvHouse. Birl roo -netie";f;;il fndu.etrial Oevefofient AurhoriEvni chnoed . cgunty fi ilii3i-iiiii".iLySenlor^CLclzenl eounc:.rSheriff,s MerlC sv"i"o, Review Board EDIUICII& IIIPIST: Itone. w-L?-L98? 95:15111 P,U !rF1?-1997 1?:18 tLElRUtfrEg I IVE llECOlEUtIEOf r Atrtprove polic1r aa aat DEPAR"IIENT DIRECTOR: strE herei-n. FT'NDS ARE AIAIIfrBI.E I}T THEFOLIONIf,G ACQ$UIIIS: P.EE/6 ADMIIISTRA csla{rqIEE tqlDs.rul t/t't la7 FIIIAIICE: ACIIOHT TOTH- P.6P.6al,-t?-L9.€,f? 6:1911 ·• ORDINANCE NO. 6244 ' Board Appointments 12.14.99 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 1, CHAPTER 4 ·oF THE AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY CODE ENTITLED "BOARDS AND AUTHORITIES" SO AS TO PROVIDE QUALIFICATIONS FOR MEMBERS, TO PROVIDE FOR REMOVAL FOR FAILURE TO MEET SUCH QUALIFICATIONS; TO REPEAL CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY COMMISSION AND IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE AUTHORITY OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Augusta-Richmond County Code, Title 1, § 1-4-1 which reads as follows: § 1-4-1. APPOINTMENT; QUALIFICATIONS; PROHIBITION AGAINST APPOINTMENT TO MORE THAN ONE BOARD OR AUTHORITY (a) The Augusta-Richmond County Commission has the responsibility under the Augusta-Richmond County Code and its Ordinances, and certain Acts of the General Assembly, to appoint members to certain boards, commissions, committees, panels, and authorities. The Augusta-Richmond County Commission deems it to be in the best interest of the citizens of Richmond County to prohibit any one individual from being appointed to more than one permanent board, commission, committee, panel, or authority for which said Commission has the authority of appointment or ratifying appointments. (b) No person who is serving on a permanent board, commission, committee, panel, authority, or other entity appointed by the former Board of Commissioners of Richmond County, the former City Council of Augusta, or the Augusta- Richmond County Commission, shall, while serving as such a member, be qualified to be appointed to any other such permanent board, commission, committee, panel, authority, or other entity. (c) It shall be the duty of any prospective appointee to any such permanent the Augusta-Richmond County Commission to indicate. to the Augusta- board, commission, committee, panel, authority, or other entity appointed by Richmond County Commission, in advance of his appointment, his membership on any other such permanent board, commission, committee, panel, authority, or other such entity. Board Appointments 12.14.99 (d) The Clerk shall notify any such appointee of his duty to notify the Augusta-Richmond County Commission of his membership on any other board, commission, committee, panel. authority, or other such entity by appointment by the former Board of Commissioners of Richmond County, the former City Council of Augusta, or the Augusta-Richmond County Commission. is hereby amended by deleting said section in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following: § 1-4-1. APPOINTMENT; QUALIFICATIONS; PROHIBITION AGAINST APPOINTMENT TO MORE THAN ONE BOARD OR AUTHORITY (a) The Augusta-Richmond County Commission has the responsibility under the Augusta-Richmond County Code and its Ordinances, and certain Acts of the General Assembly, to appoint members to certain boards, commissions, committees, panels, and authorities. The Augusta-Richmond County Commission deems it to be in the best interest of the citizens of Richmond County to prohibit any one individual from being appointed to more than one permanent board, commission, committee, panel, or authority for which said Commission has the authority of appointment or ratifying appointments and to provide qualifications for members on same. . (b) No person who is serving on a permanent board, commission, committee, panel, authority, or other entity appointed by the former Board of Commissioners of Richmond County, the former City Council of Augusta, or the Augusta- Richmond County Commission, shall, while serving as such a member, be qualified to be appointed to any other such permanent board, commission, committee, panel, authority, or other entity. (c) No individual shall be eligible to be appointed to, or serve upon, any board, commission, authority, or other agency for which the Augusta-Richmond County Commission has the power of appointment, or the responsibility of approving appointments, who: (1) Has been convicted of a felony or a crime of moral turpitude, unless such individual has had his civil rights restored as provided by law; (2) Is under indictment for a felony or a crime of moral turpitude; or (3) Is not a resident of Richmond County, or fails to maintain his residency in Richmond County, except where otherwise permitted by law. (d) It shall be the duty of any prospective appointee to any such permanent the Augusta-Richmond County Commission to indicate to the Augusta- board, commission, committee, panel, authority, or other entity appointed by Richmond County Commission, in advance of his appointment, his membership on any other such permanent board, commission, committee, panel. authority, or other such entity and his qualification to serve as provided herein. (e) The Clerk shall notify any such appointee of his duty to notify · the Augusta-Richmond County Commission of his membership on any other board, commission, committee, panel. authority, or other such entity by appointment by 2 ·' Board Appointments 12.14.99 the former Board of Commissioners of Richmond County, the former City Council of Augusta, or the Augusta-Richmond County Commission and of his not being disqualified to serve for failing to meet the qualifications set forth in subparagraph (g) hereo£ Section 2. The Augusta-Richmond County Code, Title 1, is hereby further amended by amending § 1-4-2 providing for a Code of Ethics for members of boards and authorities by amending § 1-4-2 (a) such that said § 1-4-2 (a) shall read as follows: (a) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, each member of any board, commission, committee, panel, authority, or other entity appointed by the Augusta- Richmond County Commission, shall, upon appointment to such entity, whether directly or upon ratification of the appointment recommended or nominated by another body or entity, be subject to the Code of Ethics and Rules of Conduct set forth in Title I, Chapter 1, Articles 2 and 3 of this Code. Section 3. The Augusta-Richmond County Code, Title 1, is hereby further amended by amending § 1-4-4 providing for removal of members and the procedures for same, such that§ 1-4-4 shall read as follows: § 1-4-4. REMOVAL; PROCEDURE Upon good cause shown, including without limitation, a violation of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct set forth in Title 1, Chapter 1, Articles 2 and 3 or a failure to meet the qualifications set forth in § 1-4-1 hereof, the Augusta-Richmond County Commission may remove from the membership of any board or authority any member which it has appointed to that board or authority. The procedure for such removal shall be as set forth in§ 1-4-2 (b) through (g) and§ 1-4-3-above. Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption. Section 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. Duly adopted 18th day of January , AITEST 1st Reading 1-4-2000 2nd reading 1-18-2000 3 Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Z-16-41 Department:Planning and Development Department:Planning and Development Caption: Z-16-41 – Reconsideration of a request by the Augusta Planning Commission to approve, with the conditions stated below, a petition by Stanley Mack, on behalf of Stanley and Shelley Mack, requesting a Special Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section 26-1 (h) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta, Georgia affecting property containing .31 acres and known as 3603 Richdale Drive. Tax Map 143-0-277- 00-0 DISTRICT 6 1. The home shall be staffed in three (3) 8- hour shifts on a 7-day, 24-hour basis with no staff sleeping in the home. 2. A private room shall be provided for staff to conduct business. 3. No more than six (6) clients are permitted to reside in the home based on the number and size of the existing bedrooms. 4. In order to continue to maintain a local business license, the applicant must continue to maintain a license with the State of Georgia, proof of compliance with the minimum requirements of Chapter 111.8-62.01 of the O.C.G.A must be provided, and the applicant must provide updated fire department compliance for six (6) clients. All requirements must be met within six (6) months of approval of this Special Exception request, or the Special Exception is void. 5. If wheelchair bound persons reside in the residence all 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design requirements must be met, including but not limited to: · All doorways must be at least 3 feet. wide. · At least one bathroom that permits a wheelchair dependent person to use all bathroom facilities unimpeded. 6. All conditions must be met prior to issuance of a local business license. (Approved by Commission January 17, 2017) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact:Cover Memo Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Jamestown Community Center Department: Department: Caption:Discuss Jamestown Community Center. (Requested by Commissioner Marion Williams) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Commissioner Work Session Personal Care Homes Department: Department: Caption:Discuss scheduling a Commission Work Session regarding the establishment of Personal Care Homes in Augusta, GA. (Requested by Commissioner Ben Hasan) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Electrical System Augusta Common Department: Department: Caption:Discuss/update from Administration regarding the electrical system at the Augusta Common. (Requested by Commissioner Marion Williams) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM John C. Calhoun Expressway Renaming Department:Clerk of Commission Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Discuss a resolution changing the name of the John C. Calhoun Expressway. (No recommendation from Administrative Services Committee February 28, 2017) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM URA Reappointment Department: Department: Caption:Motion to approve the reappointment of Mr. Brad Owens to the Augusta Urban Redevelopment Board. (Requested by Commissioner Sean Frantom Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo S 36-61-18. Urban redevelopment agency; organization; powers;..., GA ST S 36-61-18 West's Code of Georeia Annotated Title s6. Iocal Government Provisions Applicable to Counties and Municinal Corporations Chapter 6r. Urban Redevelopment (Refs &Annos) Ga. Code Ann., $ 36-6r-18 $ 36-6r-18. Urban redevelopment agency; organization; powers; procedure Currentness (a) There is created in each municipality and in each county a public body corporate and politic to be known as the "urban redevelopment agency" of the municipality or county. Such agency shall not transact any business or exercise its powers under this Code section until or unless the local governing body has made the finding prescribed in Code Section 36-61-5 and has elected to have the urban redevelopment project powers exercised by an urban redevelopment agency as provided in Code Section 36-61-17. 7 fUl tf the urban redevelopment agency is authorized to transact business and exercise powers under this Code section, the mayor. by and with the advice and consent of the local goveming bodli. or the board of commissioners or other governing body of the county shall appoint a board of commissioners,of the urban redevelopment agenc)r, which shall consist of such number of commissioners, with such terms of offrce, as shall be determined by the local governing body. If the governing body of a municipality designates members of a downtown development authority as an urban redevelopment agency, the method of appointment, number of commissioners, and terms of office shall be in conformity with the requirements of Code Section 36-42-4. (c) A commissioner shall receive no compensation for his services but shall be entitled to the necessary expenses, including traveling expenses, incurred in the discharge of his duties. Each commissioner shall hold offrce until his successor has been appointed and has qualified. A certificate of the appointment or reappointment of any commissioner shall be filed with the clerk of the municipality or county and such certificate shall be conclusive evidence of the due and proper appointment of such commissioner. (d) The powers of an urban redevelopment agency shall be exercised by the commissioners thereof. A majority of the commissioners shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting business and exercising the powers of the agency and for all other purposes. Action may be taken by the agency upon a vote of a majority of the commissioners present, unless in any case the bylaws require a larger number. Any person may be appointed as commissioner if he resides within the area of operation of the agency, which shall be coterminous with the area of operation of the municipality or county, and is otherwise eligible for such appointments under this chapter. l7{e) The mayor or the board of commissioners or other goveming body of the county shall designate a chairman and vice-chairman from among the commissioners. An agency may employ an executive director, technical experts, and such other agents and employees, perrnanent and temporary, as it may require and may determine their qualifications, duties, and ysH$YL&\-d $i :l*"i i: Yi:*l'vr:l+il fie*istli. I'ln i,:li,rrr:t t* i:liiliit;*1 ll $i. ii*vernillllriil \fu*ri{s S 36-61-18. Urban redevelopment agency; organization; powers;..., GA ST S 36-61-18 compensation. For such legal service as it may require, an agency may employ or retain its own counsel and legal staff. An agency authorized to transact business and exercise powers under this chapter shall file with the local governing body, on or before March 3l of each year, a report of its activities for the preceding calendar year, which report shall include a complete financial statement setting forth its assets, liabilities, income, and operating expense as of the end of such calendar year. At the time of filing the report, the agency shall publish in a newspaper of general circulation in the community a notice to the effect that such report has been filed with the municipality or county and that the report is available for inspection during business hours in the office of the city or county clerk and in the office of the agency. (0 For inefficiency, neglect of duty, or misconduct in office, a commissioner may be removed, but only after a hearing. He shall be given a copy ofthe charges at least ten days prior to such hearing and shall have an opportunity to be heard in person or by counsel. Credits Laws 1955, p.354, $ l6; Laws 1992,p.2533, $ 16. Ga. Code Ann., $ 36-61-18, GA ST S 36-61-18 The statutes and Constitution are current with legislation passed during the2016 Session of the Georgia General Assembly. The statutes are subject to changes by the Georgia Code Commission. End of Document (O 2017 Thonrson Reuters. No clain, to original U.S. Governnrent lVorks '$f$'$T-Le\ry,;l .)lJ 1 f lii*:iirlrtI ft*i.;t,".rr'ti ru*rl TO BE THE NOTE:ANY INFORMATION ENTERED ON YOUR SUBMISSION/APPOINTMENT. TALENT BANK INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE BY PERSONS DESIRING TO VOLUNTEER THEIR SERVICES ON ITY, BOARD OR COMMISSION FOR AUGUSTA, GEORGIA uR/q:D ON THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WOULD BECOME PUBLIC INFORMATION UPON f 5?nal .EMAIL ADDRESS: DArE: 2Z F 1.NAME: Bradk,a E.Ower\s --7 HoME pHoNE: N/A BUS. pHoN ., 7@ 6' 799 '1OAZ Cxo TAX\+ ocr +(SEX: ,O'= K FEMALE "=, k *o vorNc DrsrRrcr 2nd D'rc{rrz* uannreo X sEPARATED COLLEGE RELATTvES woRKtNG FoR THE coUNTy: I\t O r.le- occuPAlor'r, ?f otr et [Ylqn oeer RACE: WHITE AFRICAN-AMERICAN ASIAN AMERICAN SPANISH SURNAMED AMERICAN INDIAN OTHER (specify) LIST BOARDS YOU PRESENTLY SERVE ON: 1 DDA 3 UKA 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 5 lticK, STREET COUNTY STATE t't1 ztP DATE OF BIRTH: CI( REGISTERED VOTER: MARITAL STATUS: EDUCATION: SINGLE ENGAGED DIVORCED HIGH SCHOOL X 8. 9. 10.K 11. 12.LIST ANY AREA IN WHICH YOU HAVE A PARTICULAR INTEREST OR EXPERTISE. Rev. 6-2016 UPDATE 02/21/17 NAME OF BOARD AUGUSTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF AUGUSTA Members Term Appointment Expires Bob Young 3-yr 02/21/17 04/01/19 Chairman Brad Owens 3-yr 02/18/14 04/01/16 Vice-Chairman Hardi Jones 3-yr 02/21/17 04/01/18 Isaac McKinney 3-yr 05/05/15 04/01/18 Bonnie Ruben 3-yr 02/21/17 04/01/20 MEETING DATE: As needed. WHERE: Municipal Building. CONTACT: Bob Young, Chairman (706) 825-1011 FUNCTION: To transact business and exercise powers under the provision of the Urban Redevelopment Law. It has been determined by the Augusta Commission that one or more slum areas exist in Augusta and that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or areas is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals, or welfare of the residents of Augusta. CREATED: Resolution adopted by the Augusta Commission April 1, 2010 activating the Urban Redevelopment Agency of Augusta in accordance with the Official Code of Georgia Annotated ( O.C.G.A.) Chapter 61 of Title 36; Section 36-61-17(b) known as the “Urban Redevelopment Law”. GENERAL INFORMATION: Five (5) Members to be appointed by the Board of Commissioners of Augusta, GA who shall serve for terms of office of three years, except for the initial commissioners, who shall serve for the terms of office specified in the resolution. Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Great Augusta Cleanup and Recycling Block Party Department: Department: Caption:Update/presentation on Augusta's community awareness efforts e.g. Environmental Services Department's March 25th "Great Augusta Cleanup and Recycling Block Party" event. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Commission Meeting Agenda 3/7/2017 2:00 PM Affidavit Department: Department: Caption:Motion to approve execution by the Mayor of the affidavit of compliance with Georgia's Open Meeting Act. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo