The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2010-09-21-Meeting Agenda Commission Meeting Agenda Commission Chamber 9/21/2010 5:00 PM INVOCATION: Reverend Gerald Caldwell, Pastor, Cornerstone of Faith Ministries PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. RECOGNITION(S) Employee of the Month A. Mr. Russell Barnes, Environmental Technician, Engineering Department, August Employee of the Month. Attachments Five (5) minute time limit per delegation DELEGATIONS B. Mr. George Harrison. RE: Proposed Parking Ordinance to amend sections 3-5-92 through 3-5-95.1 relating to parking violations and enforcement. Attachments C. Ms. Juanita L. Burney. RE: Enforcement of ARC Code relating to the Mt. Olive Memorial Gardens Cemetery. Attachments CONSENT AGENDA (Items 1-34) PLANNING 1. Z-10-52 – A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve a petition by Bobbie Youman, on behalf of McClure Investments LLC, requesting a Special Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section 26-1- (H) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta-Richmond County affecting property containing .20 acres and known as 1913 Ellis Street. (Tax Map 035-2-057-00-0) DISTRICT 1 Attachments 2. Z-10-54 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Attachments Commission to approve a petition by Mike Watson, on behalf of the Woodbine West Association Inc., requesting a change of zoning from Zone B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to Zone B-2 (General Business) affecting property containing .11 acres and located 56.35 feet west of Heatherwood Parkway and also 357 feet, more or less south of Washington Road. (Part of Tax Map 011-0-228-00-0) DISTRICT 7 3. Z-10-55 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve with the following conditions 1) no derelict vehicles may be stored on the property and 2) only outside storage limited to one waste container; a petition by Michael Hronchek, on behalf of Alonzo Boardman, requesting a change of zoning from Zone B-1 (Neighborhood Business) and Zone LI (Light Industry) to Zone LI affecting property containing .86 acres and known as 207 Sand Bar Ferry Road. (Tax Map 048-3-095-00-0) DISTRICT 1 Attachments 4. Z-10-56 – A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve a petition by Cranston Engineering Group, on behalf of Coel Development Co. Inc. requesting a change of zoning from Zone A (Agriculture) and Zone LI (Light Industry) to Zone Zone R-1 (One-family Residential) with a Special Exception to allow detached dwellings developed in accordance with Section 13 provided that the density does not exceed three (3) units per acre per Section 8-2 (a) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta-Richmond County affecting property containing approximately 197 acres and is known as 2795 Gordon Highway. (Tax Map 064-0-008-00-0) DISTRICT 3 Attachments PUBLIC SERVICES 5. Motion to approve the August 2010 Budget Amendment for Augusta Regional Airport. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 6. Motion to approve New Ownership Application: A. N. 10 - 40: request by Jamila Fazalbhoy for a retail package Liquor, Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with Wrightsboro Rd. Enterprise D/B/A H & S Wine Spirits located at 3150 Wrightsboro Rd., Suite B. District 5. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 7. Motion to approve a New Ownership Application: A. N. 10 - 41: request by Jamila Fazalbhoy for a retail package Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with JAAN, Inc. D/B/A Tip Top Foodmart located at 2447 Wrightsboro Rd. District 2. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 8. Motion to approve New Ownership Application: A. N. 10 - 42: request by Jamila Fazalbhoy for a retail package Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with Attachments JARAY Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Super Express located at 3150 Wrightsboro Rd. District 5. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) 9. Motion to approve New Application: A. N. 10 - 43: request by Latron Ware for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with Three Dollar Lounge located at 1524 Gordon Hwy. There will be Dance. District 2. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 10. Motion to rebid Request for Proposals (RFP) for operation of Augusta Municipal Golf Course. (Approved by Public Services Committee Spetember 13, 2010) Attachments 11. Motion to approve the 2010 Supplemental Agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 12. Motion to approve and accept AIP #3-13-0011-033-2010 in the amount of $13,775,000.00 for rehabilitation for Runway 17-35 Augusta Regional Airport. (Approved by Public Services & Finance Committees September 13, 2010) Attachments ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 13. Motion to approve an Ordinance to amend the Augusta, Georgia Code Article Twelve, Sections 3-5-92 through 3-5-95.1 relating to parking violations and enforcement; to add new Sections 3-5-95.2 through 3-5-95.24; to allow the Downtown Development Authority to enforce parking violations and use collected funds for revitalization in Augusta; to repeal all Ordinances and parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith; to provide an effective date and for other purposes. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments PUBLIC SAFETY 14. Motion to approve the purchase of an Automated Firing Range System for the Richmond County Sheriff's Training Range Facility for $86,214.00.00, lowest bid on bid #10-148. (Approved by Public Safety Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 15. Motion to approve a request from Sentinel Offender Services to amend their contract to allow them to sub-contract with ARSS (American Recovery Solution Services) in the collection of fines/fees on outstanding probation violation warrants. (Approved by Public Safety Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments FINANCE 16. Motion to approve funding for the August 10, 2010 Runoff. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 17. Motion to approve a request from the Asociacion Cultural Hispanoamericana for the City to provide the use of the Augusta Common at no cost for the 18th Annual Hispanic Festival. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 18. Motion to approve the replacement of EMA Dive Team Boat. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 19. Motion to approve 1) additional category for Random Testing under Substance Abuse Policy for both Full-Time and Part-time Security Officer positions, Section 1.4.16.21 2) FTA/DOT update on drug testing panel, Section 1.8.1.3.5 and 1.8.1.3.8. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 20. Motion to approve continuing service agreement with Georgia Administrative Services (GAS) as the third party administrator for Augusta, GA’s Workers’ Compensation claims program. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments ENGINEERING SERVICES 21. Motion to determine that a portion of Fairhope Street, as shown on the attached plat (shown as Parcel "B") and consisting of 1.63 acres (71,042 square feet), has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public purpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, and a public hearing shall be held regarding the issue of abandonment pursuant to O.C.G.A. Sections 32-7-2 and 8-3-153. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 22. Motion to approve construction contract award to L-J, Inc. in the amount of $238,987.41. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 23. Motion to approve the award of a contract in the amount of $1,602,193.46 to Weinberger, and in the amount of $110,666.20 to Modern Business for Bid item #10- 084A; Furniture for the new ARC Judicial Center. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 24. Motion to approve the purchase of (1) Waste Handler Hydraulic Excavator from Tractor & Equipment of Augusta for the Solid Waste Department. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 25. Motion to approve the purchase of a 4” Godwin Water Pump off the General Services Administration (GSA) Contract GS-07F-9491G. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 26. Motion to approve the authorization for R.J. Griffin to award Bid Package #2, in the amount of $2,066,200.00, which includes all disciplines not covered in Bid Package #1 for the new Reynolds Street Parking Deck and set the GMP for the project at $6,852,006.00. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 27. Motion to approve and accept a Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Forest Place, Phases 2-A and 2-B. (Approved by Engneering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 28. Motion to approve award of the Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $104,660. Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 29. Motion to approve and accept a Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Hopetown Villas, Phase II. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 30. Motion to approve award of the Light Emission Diode (LED) Module Replacement Project to Republic I.T.S in the amount of $109,822. Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 31. Motion to approve and accept the Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Longpoint Townhomes, Phase 3-A. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments 32. Motion to approve award of the Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $710,990. Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. (Approved by Attachments Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) 33. Motion to approve award of the Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $369,120 Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Attachments PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS 34. Motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Commission held September 7th, and legal meeting held September 13, 2010. Attachments ****END CONSENT AGENDA**** AUGUSTA COMMISSION 9/21/2010 AUGUSTA COMMISSION REGULAR AGENDA 9/21/2010 (Items 35-37) PLANNING 35. Z-10-51 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve with the condition that the only residents be elderly women; a petition by Mrs. Curtis Williams, on behalf of Curtis L. Williams, requesting a Special Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section 26-1- (H) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta-Richmond County affecting property containing .20 acres and known as 3420 Gary Circle. (Tax Map 122-4-050- 00-0) DISTRICT 2 Attachments 36. Z-10-50 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve a petition by Ramonica M. Luke requesting a Special Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section 26-1- (H) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta-Richmond County affecting property containing .23 acres and known as 1613 Fairwood Drive. (Tax Map 041-4-164-00-0) DISTRICT 3 Attachments LEGAL MEETING A. Pending and Potential Litigation. Upcoming Meetings www.augustaga.gov B. Real Estate. C. Personnel. 37. Motion to authorize execution by the Mayor of the affidavit of compliance with Georgia's Open Meeting Act. Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Invocation Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Reverend Gerald Caldwell, Pastor, Cornerstone of Faith Ministries Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 1 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Employee of the Month Department: Caption:Mr. Russell Barnes, Environmental Technician, Engineering Department, August Employee of the Month. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 2 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 2 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM George Harrison Department: Caption:Mr. George Harrison. RE: Proposed Parking Ordinance to amend sections 3-5-92 through 3-5-95.1 relating to parking violations and enforcement. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 3 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 3 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Juanita L.Burney Department: Caption:Ms. Juanita L. Burney. RE: Enforcement of ARC Code relating to the Mt. Olive Memorial Gardens Cemetery. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 4 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 4 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Planning Commission Department:Planning Commission Caption: Z-10-51 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve with the condition that the only residents be elderly women; a petition by Mrs. Curtis Williams, on behalf of Curtis L. Williams, requesting a Special Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section 26-1- (H) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta-Richmond County affecting property containing .20 acres and known as 3420 Gary Circle. (Tax Map 122-4-050-00-0) DISTRICT 2 Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 5 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Planning Commission Department:Planning Commission Caption: Z-10-52 – A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve a petition by Bobbie Youman, on behalf of McClure Investments LLC, requesting a Special Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section 26-1- (H) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta-Richmond County affecting property containing .20 acres and known as 1913 Ellis Street. (Tax Map 035-2-057- 00-0) DISTRICT 1 Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 6 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Planning Commission Department:Planning Commission Caption: Z-10-54 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve a petition by Mike Watson, on behalf of the Woodbine West Association Inc., requesting a change of zoning from Zone B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to Zone B-2 (General Business) affecting property containing .11 acres and located 56.35 feet west of Heatherwood Parkway and also 357 feet, more or less south of Washington Road. (Part of Tax Map 011-0-228-00-0) DISTRICT 7 Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 7 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Planning Commission Department:Planning Commission Caption: Z-10-55 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve with the following conditions 1) no derelict vehicles may be stored on the property and 2) only outside storage limited to one waste container; a petition by Michael Hronchek, on behalf of Alonzo Boardman, requesting a change of zoning from Zone B-1 (Neighborhood Business) and Zone LI (Light Industry) to Zone LI affecting property containing .86 acres and known as 207 Sand Bar Ferry Road. (Tax Map 048-3-095-00-0) DISTRICT 1 Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 8 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Planning Commission Department:Planning Commission Caption: Z-10-50 - A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve a petition by Ramonica M. Luke requesting a Special Exception to establish a Family Personal Care Home per Section 26-1- (H) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta- Richmond County affecting property containing .23 acres and known as 1613 Fairwood Drive. (Tax Map 041-4-164-00-0) DISTRICT 3 Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 9 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Planning Commission Department:Planning Commission Caption: Z-10-56 – A request for concurrence with the Augusta Richmond County Planning Commission to approve a petition by Cranston Engineering Group, on behalf of Coel Development Co. Inc. requesting a change of zoning from Zone A (Agriculture) and Zone LI (Light Industry) to Zone Zone R-1 (One-family Residential) with a Special Exception to allow detached dwellings developed in accordance with Section 13 provided that the density does not exceed three (3) units per acre per Section 8-2 (a) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for Augusta-Richmond County affecting property containing approximately 197 acres and is known as 2795 Gordon Highway. (Tax Map 064-0-008-00-0) DISTRICT 3 Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 10 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM 2010 Budget Amendment Department:Augusta Regional Airport Caption:Motion to approve the August 2010 Budget Amendment for Augusta Regional Airport. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:Periodically the budget is amended to reflect current activity. The revised budget provides a better snap shot of the airports revenues and expenses. Analysis:The most significant change in the amendment is an increase in fuel revenue and an increase with fuel expense. This is typically done annually to reflect current activity. When the 2010 budget was prepared in 2009 it reflected the trends (cost of fuel, gallons sold by market segment) of that point in time. Due to fluctuating fuel costs and the increase in fuel sales to an additional airline, an amendment is needed to avoid a budget block of future fuel purchases. Financial Impact: Alternatives:Deny the request. Recommendation:Approve the request as presented. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 11 Augusta Regional Airport 8/16/2010 Budget Amendment Increase Ending (Decrease) Balance 551000000 3611110 Interest Rev (100,000) 50,000 551081101 3492301 Airline Space Rent (118,000) 682,000 551081101 3492304 Concessions Food & Bev (12,000) 10,000 551081101 3492405 Rental Car Serv Area Rent (5,000) 10,000 551081103 3492201 Airline Landing Fees (60,000) 340,000 551081103 3492205 Apron Use Fee 64,000 164,000 551081106 3492105 GA Ramp Fees 18,000 168,000 551081106 3492108 Facility Use (13,000) 37,000 551081106 3481110 Parking Fee (6,500) 20,000 551081106 3492112 Avjet Fuel 5,460,000 14,398,900 551081106 3492113 100L Fuel 78,000 280,000 551081106 3492115 Diesel Fuel Sales 4,500 24,000 551081106 3492203 Ga-Landing fees (68,000) 12,000 551081106 3492204 In To Plane Sales 458,000 458,000 551081106 3492507 Office/Hangar Rentals 6,700 70,000 551081106 3492701 Sales Discount AvJet (17,280) (48,000) 551081106 3492702 Sales Discount 100LL (5,600) (11,900) 551081114 3611110 Interest Revenues (55,000) 30,000 551081114 3611111 Int Revenues - DS Reserve (19,500)500 5,609,320 551081106 5315120 Avjet Fuel expense 1,115,440 7,893,000 551081106 5315121 100 LL Fuel 61,060 214,900 551081101 5212120 Legal 40,000 100,000 551081101 5235112 Travel Expenses 9,000 14,000 551081103 5311610 General Traffic Supplies 4,000 12,000 551081103 5319150 R & M Grounds 6,000 15,000 551081106 5236131 Credit Card Service Charge 33,000 213,000 551081106 5311115 Master's Expense 63,000 178,000 551081107 5239110 Contract Labor 35,000 35,000 551081107 5399999 Other Supplies 5,000 5,500 551081108 5316210 Noncapitalized Equipment 15,000 17,000 1,386,500 551101110 6021110 Available for future years 4,222,820 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 11 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Alcohol Application Department:License & Inspections Caption:Motion to approve New Ownership Application: A. N. 10 - 40: request by Jamila Fazalbhoy for a retail package Liquor, Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with Wrightsboro Rd. Enterprise D/B/A H & S Wine Spirits located at 3150 Wrightsboro Rd., Suite B. District 5. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:This is a new ownership application. Formerly in the name of Riaz Fazalbhoy. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the Augusta Richmond County Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant wil pay a fee of $2117.50. Alternatives: Recommendation:License & Inspections recommends aproval. The RCSD recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 12 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 12 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 12 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Alcohol Application Department:License & Inspection Caption:Motion to approve a New Ownership Application: A. N. 10 - 41: request by Jamila Fazalbhoy for a retail package Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with JAAN, Inc. D/B/A Tip Top Foodmart located at 2447 Wrightsboro Rd. District 2. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:This is a new ownership application. Formerly in the name of Riaz Fazalbhoy. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the Augusta Richmond County Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a fee of $605.00. Alternatives: Recommendation:License & Inspections recommends approval. The RCSD recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 13 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 13 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 13 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Alcohol Application Department:License & Inspections Caption:Motion to approve New Ownership Application: A. N. 10 - 42: request by Jamila Fazalbhoy for a retail package Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with JARAY Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Super Express located at 3150 Wrightsboro Rd. District 5. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:This is a new ownership application. Formerly in the name of Raiz Fazalbhoy. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the Augusta Richmond County Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a fee of $605.00. Alternatives: Recommendation:License & Inspections recommends approval. The RCSD recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 14 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 14 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 14 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Alcohol Application Department:License & Inspections Caption:Motion to approve New Application: A. N. 10 - 43: request by Latron Ware for an on premise consumption Liquor, Beer & Wine license to be used in connection with Three Dollar Lounge located at 1524 Gordon Hwy. There will be Dance. District 2. Super District 9. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:This is a new application. Analysis:The applicant meets the requirements of the Augusta Richmond County Alcohol Ordinance. Financial Impact:The applicant will pay a fee of $2227.50. Alternatives: Recommendation:License & Inspections recommends approval. The RCSD recommends approval. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 15 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 15 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 15 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Augusta Municipal Golf Course Department:Recreation and Parks Caption:Motion to rebid Request for Proposals (RFP) for operation of Augusta Municipal Golf Course. (Approved by Public Services Committee Spetember 13, 2010) Background:The Augusta Commission voted at their June 15th, 2010 meeting to instruct staff to issue Request for Proposals(RFP) for operation of Augusta Municipal Golf Course. The Augusta Procurement Dept. issued RFP # 10-142, and proposals were due August 17th, 2010. Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 16 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 16 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Request for Proposals will be received at this office until Tuesday, August 17, 2010 @ 3:00 P.M. for furnishing: RFP ITEM #10-142 Operation of Augusta Municipal Golf Course for Recreation and Parks Department RFPs will be received by: The Augusta Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams, Director Augusta Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 RFP documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by Tuesday, August 3, 2010 @ 5:00 P.M. by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. No RFP will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference on an eligible local project, the certification statement as a local bidder and all supporting documents must be submitted to the Procurement Department with your bonafide bid package. No RFP may be withdrawn for a period of 90 days after time has been called on the date of opening. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. Please mark RFP number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of RFP documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of RFP documents from unauthorized sources places the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia does not operate a DBE, MBE or WBE Program but rather pursuant to its code of ordinances, this local government operates instead a Local Small Business Opportunity Program. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle July 8, 15, 22, 29, 2010 Metro Courier July 14, 2010 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Tom Beck Recreation and Parks Ron Houck Recreation and Parks Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 16 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 3 Item # 16 Attachment number 3 Page 2 of 3 Item # 16 Attachment number 3 Page 3 of 3 Item # 16 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 2 Item # 16 Attachment number 4 Page 2 of 2 Item # 16 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM FAA Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Department:Augusta Regional Airport Caption:Motion to approve the 2010 Supplemental Agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration. (Approved by Public Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:Federal Aviation Administration currently has a five-year lease agreement with the airport. The approved lease agreement has several items that need to be modified/corrected in order for payment processing. The location of FAA’s agreement is currently located in the Weather Bureau Building. Analysis:Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has provided the airport with a supplemental agreement that eliminates janitorial services which reduces the responsibility of the airport’s staff. FAA is also asking for an updated Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) form to be completed. Lastly, FAA has modified the Notices section of the lease agreement to change contact information as it relates to the government. Pamela Everett has reviewed the supplemental agreement. Financial Impact:No impact. Alternatives:Deny request. Recommendation:Recommend the approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 1 with the Federal Aviation Administration. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 17 PDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION EASTERN LOGISTICS SERVICE AREA ATLANTA, GAP Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Lease No. DTFASO-09-L-00117 Facility: SSU Office and Storage Space Location: Augusta, GA THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, entered into this ________ day of _____________ , Two Thousand and Ten, between the Augusta Aviation Commission, whose interest in the property hereinafter described is that of Lessor, and the United States of America, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Southern Region, P. O. Box 20636, College Park, Georgia 30337, hereinafter called the GOVERNMENT; WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties to amend FAA Lease No. DTFASO-09-L-00117, dated August 28, 2008, whereby the Lessor leases to the Government approximately 1,296 square feet of rental office space and 863 square feet of rent-free storage area located at 1500 Hangar Road. All space is located on the Augusta Municipal Airport ± Bush Field, Augusta, GA. NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that the said Lease is hereby amended, as follows, without change in the terms and conditions specified therein, unless otherwise herein provided, effective as of the date first written above, as follows: I. ARTICLE 6. SERVICES AND UTILITIES (To be provided by LESSOR) as part of rent. List of Services and Utilities is modified as follows: ³'DLO\-DQLWRULDO6HUYLFHV 6XSSOLHV'DLO\'XVWLQJ´LVGHOHWHG and no item(s) added. II. ARTICLES 9, 10 AND 11 are hereby added in their entirety: ³ARTICLE 9. JANITORIAL SERVICES. The Lessor shall maintain the common and outside areas in a clean condition. The Government is responsible for janitorial service within the GHPLVHGSUHPLVHV´ ³$57,&/(PAYMENT BY ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER: ( ³&RQWUDFWRU´LVV\QRQ\PRXVZLWK³/HVVRU´IRUUHDOSURSHUW\SXUSRVHV.) (a) Method of payment. 1. All payments by the Government under this contract will be made by electronic funds transfer (EFT), except as provided in paragraph (a) (2) or (a) (3) of this lease. As used in this clause, the term "EFT" refers to the funds transfer and may also include the payment information transfer. Payment information transfer refers to the payment information normally sent with a payment to assist the contractor in associating the payment to specific contracts. 2. In the event the Government is unable to release one or more payments by EFT, the Contractor agrees to either; Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 4 Item # 17 a. Accept payment by check or b. Request the Government to extend the payment due date until such time as the Government can make payment by EFT (but see paragraph (d) of this clause). 3. In the event that the Contractor is granted a waiver from EFT under the exceptions as provided for in FAA AMS Section T3.3.1.A-7, the Government payments will be made by check. A waiver from EFT is not permanent, and the Contractor must register for EFT when the circumstances that justified the waiver change. (b) Contractor's EFT information. The Government will make payment to the Contractor using the EFT information contained in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database. In the event that the EFT information changes, the Contractor will be responsible for providing the updated information to the CCR database (Reference Clause, "Central Contractor Registration - Real Property"). If the Contractor is granted an exemption from CCR, the contractor will follow the requirements of alternate clause "Contractor Payment Information - Non-CCR". (c) Mechanisms for EFT payment. The Government may make payment by EFT through either the Automated Clearing House (ACH) network, subject to the rules of the National Automated Clearing House Association, or the Fedwire Transfer System. The rules governing Federal payments through the ACH are contained in 31 CFR Part 210. (d) Suspension of payment. If the Contractor's EFT information in the CCR database is incorrect, then the Government is not required to make payments to the Contractor under this contract until correct EFT information is entered into the CCR database, and any invoice or contract financing request submitted during this period of noncompliance will be deemed not to be a proper invoice for the purpose of prompt payment under this contract. In such instances, the late interest payment terms of the contract regarding notice of an improper invoice and delays in accrual of interest penalties apply. (e) Liability for incomplete or erroneous transfers. (1) If an incomplete or erroneous transfer occurs because the Government used the Contractor's EFT information incorrectly, the Government remains responsible for, (i) Making a correct payment; (ii) Paying any late payment penalty due; and (iii) Recovering any erroneously directed funds. (2) If an incomplete or erroneous transfer occurs because the Contractor's EFT information was incorrect, or was revised within 30 days of Government release of the EFT payment transaction instruction to the Federal Reserve System, and, (i) If the funds are no longer under the control of the payment office, the Government is deemed to have made payment and the Contractor is responsible for recovery of any erroneously directed funds; or (ii) If the funds remain under the control of the payment office, the Government will make payment under the provisions of paragraph (d)) "Suspension of Payment". (f) EFT and payment terms. A payment will be deemed to have been made in a timely manner in accordance with the payment terms of this contract if, in the EFT payment transaction instruction released Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 4 Item # 17 to the Federal Reserve System, the date specified for settlement of the payment is on or before the payment due date, provided the specified payment date is a valid date under the rules of the Federal Reserve System. (g) EFT and assignment of claims. If the Contractor assigns the proceeds of this contract, as provided for in the assignment of claims terms of this contract, the Contractor will require that the assignee register separately in the CCR database and that the assignee agree that payments will be made by EFT in accordance with the terms of this clause. The requirements of this clause will apply to the assignee as if it were the Contractor. EFT information that shows the ultimate recipient of the transfer to be other than the Contractor or the CCR registered assignee is incorrect EFT information within the meaning of paragraph (d) "Suspension of Payment" clause. (h) EFT and Change of Name or Ownership Changes. If the Contractor transfers ownership of the property under lease or changes its business name, it will follow the requirements of section (g) of clause, "Central Contractor Registration - Real Property". (i) Liability for change of EFT information by financial agent. The Government is not liable for errors resulting from changes to EFT information made by the Contractor's financial agent. (ii) Payment information. The accounting office will forward to the Contractor available payment information that is suitable for transmission as of the date of release of the EFT instruction to the Federal Reserve System. The Government may request the Contractor to designate a desired format and method(s) for delivery of payment information from a list of formats and methods the payment office is capable of executing. However, the Government does not guarantee that any particular format or method of delivery is available at any particular payment office and retains the latitude to use the format and delivery method most convenient to the Government. The Contractor can obtain detailed payment information by registering for the US Treasury PAID system. This can be done on the internet by logging onto the website: https://fmsapps.treas.gov/paid/. If the Government makes payment by check in accordance with paragraph (a) of this clause, the Government will mail the payment information to the remittance address contained in the contract and CCR database. ARTICLE 11. NOTICES. All notices/correspondence shall be in writing, and shall be addressed as follows (or to such other address as either party may designate from time to time by notice or correspondence to the other) TO LESSOR: Augusta Aviation Commission 1501 Aviation Way Augusta, GA 30906 ± 9600 ATTN: Airport Director TO GOVERNMENT: Federal Aviation Administration Southern Region, ASO-53 P. O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 4 Item # 17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed their names: AUGUSTA AVIATION COMMISSION By: _____________________________ Date: _________________ Chairman, Augusta Aviation Commission Witness: _________________________ Date: _________________ By: ______________________________ Date: ________________ Mayor Witness __________________________ Date: __________________ City Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA By: ______________________________ Date: ________________ Nancy A. Young, Real Estate Contracting Officer Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 4 Item # 17 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Federal AIP Grant 3-13-0011-033-2010/Runway 17-35 Augusta Regional Airport Department:Augusta Regional Airport Caption:Motion to approve and accept AIP #3-13-0011-033-2010 in the amount of $13,775,000.00 for rehabilitation for Runway 17-35 Augusta Regional Airport. (Approved by Public Services & Finance Committees September 13, 2010) Background:Recent Engineering Analysis supports the reconstruction of Runway 17-35 at the Augusta Regional Airport. The runway has surpassed its twenty year design life by several years and was in need of an overlay to renew its designed load bearing characteristics. After lengthly testing however, it has been determined that de- lamination at depths well below the surface have occurred in the existing paving section requiring a reconstruction of the runway's keel section as opposed to a simple overlay. Analysis:A detailed specification was developed for bidding purposes and public bids were opened by the County's Procurement Department on September 2, 2010. Financial Impact:The Engineer's estimate prior to bid was $15,533,981.00 to reconstruct runway 17- 35. The apparent responsive low bid was from APAC-Tennessee, Inc. at $14,256,033.97 for the project. The Federal Aviation Administration is offering grant 3-13-0011-033-2010 in the amount of $13,775,000 for the project for up to 95% with Augusta Regional Airport providing the 5% match. Sufficient matching funds currently exist in the capital outlay section of the Augusta Regional Airport Enterprise Fund Budget. Alternatives:Reject the grant. Recommendation:The Augusta Aviation Commission recommends the acceptance of AIP Grant #3-13- 0011-033-2010 in the amount of $13,775,000.00 Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: The matching funds are available in 551000000/1111526 Capital Improvement Cash Account. Partial capital expense is budgeted in 551081301/5412110 with the remainder budgeted in 2011. REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 18 C A M P B E L L & P A R I S E N G I N E E R S 313 WINGO WAY MT. PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA 29464 WWW.CAMPBELL-PARIS.COM TEL 843.856.9989/FAX 843.856.2829 September 10, 2010 Mr. Gary Le Tellier, AAE Executive Director Augusta Regional Airport 1501 Aviation Way Augusta, Georgia 30906 RE: Runway 17-35 Rehabilitation Augusta Regional Airport at Bush Field Letter of Recommendation and Bid Analysis Dear Gary: On September 2, 2010, the City of Augusta’s Procurement Department received six (6) bid proposals for consideration associated with the above referenced project. Each proposal was opened by the Procurement Department’s representative, then reviewed to determine if the bid package was a responsive bid. As you are aware, after careful review by the City it was determined that four (4) of the six (6) bids were deemed “non-responsive”. Therefore, the non- responsive bid results were not read aloud. For the two (2) bids that were determined to be responsive, the bid amounts were read aloud. The apparent low bidder was APAC Tennessee with a bid price of $14,256,033.97 for the complete project. The second bidder, Scruggs Company was the apparent second low bidder at $15,182,845.74. Enclosed is the overall bid analysis with results from the two (2) bidders. Upon detailed review of the submitted bids, Campbell and Paris Engineers found both APAC Tennessee’s and Scruggs Company’s Schedule of Unit Prices proposal to be mathematically correct and presented in accordance with the specifications. APAC Tennessee’s total bid amount is approximately 8.3% below the Engineer’s estimate and represents the low bid, whereas, Scruggs Company’s bid amount is approximately 2.2% below the Engineer’s estimate. In reviewing the unit prices of the apparent low bidder, it was determined their unit costs are very competitive. It is my understanding that APAC Tennessee has been contacted by the City of Augusta requesting post bid information. I was informed this information was submitted to the City of Augusta’s Procurement Department Thursday, September 9, 2010. A I R P O R T P L A N N I N G , D E S I G N A N D C O N S T R U C T I O N M A N A G E M E N T F O R T H E 2 1 S T C E N T U R Y ! Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 4 Item # 18 Mr. Gary Le Tellier, AAE September 10, 2010 Page 2 Page 2 of 2 In reviewing the apparent lower bidder’s (APAC Tennessee) references, it was determined: - APAC TN has been in the concrete industry for over 80 years, - APAC TN was involved with the construction in 3 of the 4 runways at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, and - APAC TN just successfully completed a Runway and Apron (Concrete) Rehabilitation project at Charleston Executive Airport (JZI), James Island, SC. Therefore, we believe APAC Tennessee to be qualified and find no reason that they would not perform the specified work satisfactorily. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 804-643-7000 ext 112. Sincerely, Campbell & Paris Engineers Jack L. Mayfield, P.E. Vice President cc: Julie Orwen/AGS HD Campbell, Jr./CPE File Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 4 Item # 18 SEPTEMBER 2010 ITEM SPEC. SECTION ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 1 100-12 Contractor Quality Control Program LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $370,000.00 $370,000.00 $358,400.00 $358,400.00 2 MD-3.1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $739,713.38 $739,713.38 $1,111,000.00 $1,111,000.00 $817,100.00 $817,100.00 3 MD-3.2 Performace Bonds and Labor & Materials Payment Bonds LS 1 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 $134,000.00 $134,000.00 $176,644.00 $176,644.00 4 MD-3.3 Project Insurance LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $13,520.00 $13,520.00 5 MD-3.4 Engineer and Contractor Offices and Staging Area LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $96,000.00 $96,000.00 $51,160.00 $51,160.00 6 MD-3.5 Radio Control, Traffic and Information Signing LS 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $3,580.00 $3,580.00 7 MD-3.6 Safety Administration, Safety Equipment, Phasing Coordination & Security System LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 $219,500.00 $219,500.00 8 MD-3.7 Construction and Maintenance of Haul Routes LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $117,650.00 $117,650.00 9 P-150-4.1-1 Variable Depth Cold Mill for Runway PCC Overlay SY 125,064 $5.00 $625,320.00 $2.00 $250,128.00 $1.68 $210,107.52 10 P-150-4.1-2 Min. 0.5" Cold Mill for Bituminous Runway Transition SY 18,472 $4.00 $73,888.00 $1.30 $24,013.60 $1.58 $29,185.76 11 P-150-4.1-3 Full Depth Pavement Demolition and Removal SY 44,444 $7.50 $333,330.00 $3.60 $159,998.40 $0.01 $444.44 12 P-150-4.1-4 Diamond Grind - RW 8-26 Bituminous Overlay Edge SY 13,277 $8.00 $106,216.00 $3.00 $39,831.00 $3.58 $47,531.66 13 P-150-4.1-5 Diamond Grind - RW Intersection PCC Finish SY 11,999 14 P-150-4.1-6 Demolish/Salvage/Remove Misc. Items LS 1 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $265,000.00 $265,000.00 $355,040.00 $355,040.00 15 P-152-4.1 Embankment CY 19,879 $14.00 $278,306.00 $23.00 $457,217.00 $14.86 $295,401.94 16 P-152-4.2 Backfill Unsuitable Excavation CY 500 $30.00 $15,000.00 $29.00 $14,500.00 $13.13 $6,565.00 17 P-152-4.3 Proofrolling/Subgrade Preparation SY 76,146 $1.00 $76,146.00 $1.25 $95,182.50 $0.61 $46,449.06 18 P-152-4.4 Original,Intermediate, and Final Surveys LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 $153,920.00 $153,920.00 19 P-156-5.1-1 Temporary Storm Drain Inlet Protection EA 15 $500.00 $7,500.00 $480.00 $7,200.00 $895.00 $13,425.00 20 P-156-5.1-2 Temporary Silt Fence LF 18,084 $3.50 $63,294.00 $4.00 $72,336.00 $2.69 $48,645.96 21 P-156-5.1-3 Storm Drain Outlet Protection EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $715.00 $1,430.00 $1,910.00 $3,820.00 22 P-156-5.1-4 Rock Check Dams EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,400.00 $2,800.00 $1,910.00 $3,820.00 23 P-156-5.1-5 Temporary Construction Exit EA 4 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 $1,700.00 $6,800.00 $3,104.00 $12,416.00 24 P-304-8.1/FDR-8.1 Cement Stabilized Base Course/Full Depth Reclamation (6" Depth) SY 76,146 $7.50 $571,095.00 $2.80 $213,208.80 $11.47 $873,394.62 25 P-304-8.2/FDR-8.2 Portland Cement for P-304/FDR (6" Depth)TON 2,479 $150.00 $371,850.00 $110.00 $272,690.00 $90.74 $224,944.46 26 P-401-8.1a Bituminous Surface Course for Airfields TON 20,544 $115.00 $2,362,560.00 $90.00 $1,848,960.00 $90.48 $1,858,821.12 26A P-403-8.1a Bituminous Base Course TON 4,581 $115.00 $526,815.00 $110.00 $503,910.00 $111.28 $509,773.68 26B P-403-8.1b Bituminous Repair Under PCC Slabs TON 3,000 $115.00 $345,000.00 $110.00 $330,000.00 $111.28 $333,840.00 27 P-501-8.1 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (14" depth)SY 141,308 $40.00 $5,652,320.00 $37.84 $5,347,094.72 $44.47 $6,283,966.76 28 P-603-5.1 Bituminous Tack Coat GAL 11,903 $5.50 $65,466.50 $3.00 $35,709.00 $3.33 $39,636.99 29 P-620-5.1-1 Pavement Marking - Airside (White)SF 185,729 $0.75 $139,296.75 $0.25 $46,432.25 $0.26 $48,289.54 30 P-620-5.1-2 Pavement Marking - Airside (Yellow)SF 16,520 $0.75 $12,390.00 $0.50 $8,260.00 $0.57 $9,416.40 31 P-620-5.1-3 Pavement Marking - Airside (Black)SF 263,351 $0.75 $197,513.25 $0.10 $26,335.10 $0.16 $42,136.16 32 P-620-5.1-4 Temporary Pavement Marking - Airside (White, Yellow, Black) SF 381,788 $0.75 $286,341.00 $0.20 $76,357.60 $0.21 $80,175.48 AUGUSTA REGIONAL AIRPORT RW 17-35 REHABILITATION AIP 3-13-0011-TBD SCHEDULE OF UNIT PRICES THE SCRUGGS COMPANYAPAC-Tennessee, Inc. RW 17-35 REHABILITATION - FULL WIDTH PCC ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 4 Item # 18 33 P-620-5.1-5 Preformed Thermoplastic Surface Painted Holding Position Signs SF 4,166 $15.00 $62,490.00 $13.00 $54,158.00 $13.26 $55,241.16 34 P-621-4.1 Saw Cut Grooving SY 133,017 $1.00 $133,017.00 $2.00 $266,034.00 $1.59 $211,497.03 35 P-626-6.1 Emulsified Asphalt Slurry Seal Surface Treatment SY 15,508 $2.00 $31,016.00 $4.00 $62,032.00 $3.09 $47,919.72 36 F-162-5.1-1 7' High Security Fence w/3 Strands of Barbed Wire (Double) LF 2,667 $21.00 $56,007.00 $15.00 $40,005.00 $18.16 $48,432.72 37 F-162-5.1-2 28' Manual Swing Gate EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $2,404.00 $2,404.00 38 D-701-5.1-1 30" CL IV RCP LF 33 $100.00 $3,300.00 $200.00 $6,600.00 $127.86 $4,219.38 39 D-701-5.1-2 36" CL IV RCP LF 583 $175.00 $102,025.00 $140.00 $81,620.00 $229.22 $133,635.26 40 D-701-5.1-3 48" CL IV RCP LF 533 $200.00 $106,600.00 $200.00 $106,600.00 $289.22 $154,154.26 41 D-701-5.1-4 4" HDPE Pipe, Perforated or Non-Perforated LF 251 $25.00 $6,275.00 $19.00 $4,769.00 $17.72 $4,447.72 42 D-751-5.1-1 5' Dia. Storm Sewer Manhole VF 20 $750.00 $15,000.00 $420.00 $8,400.00 $611.57 $12,231.40 43 D-751-5.1-1 6' Dia. Storm Sewer Manhole VF 6 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 $662.00 $3,972.00 44 D-751-5.1-2 Grate Inlet EA 4 $4,000.00 $16,000.00 $3,700.00 $14,800.00 $2,388.00 $9,552.00 45 D-751-5.1-3 Standard Frame and Cover EA 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,791.00 $3,582.00 46 D-751-5.1-4 Adjust Existing Drainage Structure to new Elevation EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,388.00 $2,388.00 47 D-751-5.1-5 Endwall Structure for 36" RCP EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,433.00 $3,433.00 48 D-751-5.1-6 Endwall Structure for 48" RCP EA 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,111.00 $6,111.00 49 L-108-5.1 5kV L-824 Cable LF 53,300 $1.75 $93,275.00 $1.00 $53,300.00 $0.73 $38,909.00 50 L-108-5.2 Temporary 5kV L-824 Cable LF 17,300 $2.00 $34,600.00 $2.00 $34,600.00 $1.98 $34,254.00 51 L-108-5.3 Counterpoise LF 34,600 $2.00 $69,200.00 $1.40 $48,440.00 $0.62 $21,452.00 52 L-110-5.1 Elec Duct under PCC, 1W-2"LF 24,200 $9.00 $217,800.00 $6.00 $145,200.00 $8.84 $213,928.00 53 L-110-5.2 Elec Duct under Shoulder, 1W-2"LF 3,700 $10.00 $37,000.00 $7.00 $25,900.00 $3.12 $11,544.00 54 L-110-5.3 Elec Conduit, Direct Bury LF 3,500 $7.00 $24,500.00 $4.00 $14,000.00 $3.54 $12,390.00 55 L-110-5.4 Elec Conduit, 8W-2"LF 1,600 $55.00 $88,000.00 $35.00 $56,000.00 $39.52 $63,232.00 56 L-115-5.1 Electrical Manhole EA 7 $4,950.00 $34,650.00 $5,000.00 $35,000.00 $5,200.00 $36,400.00 57 L-115-5.2 Electrical Junction Structure EA 10 $500.00 $5,000.00 $540.00 $5,400.00 $826.80 $8,268.00 58 L-125-5.1 Adjust L-862 Elevated HIRL EA 70 $1,200.00 $84,000.00 $1,000.00 $70,000.00 $780.00 $54,600.00 59 L-125-5.2 New L850C Semi-Flush HIRL EA 12 $2,000.00 $24,000.00 $2,000.00 $24,000.00 $1,768.00 $21,216.00 60 L-125-5.3 Adjust L-861T Elevated MITL w/ new base EA 43 $1,200.00 $51,600.00 $1,000.00 $43,000.00 $832.00 $35,776.00 61 L-125-5.4 Adjust L-861T Elevated MITL, extend base EA 16 $600.00 $9,600.00 $800.00 $12,800.00 $780.00 $12,480.00 62 L-125-5.5 Replace RW Threshold/End Fixture EA 16 $1,000.00 $16,000.00 $1,000.00 $16,000.00 $780.00 $12,480.00 63 L-125-5.6 Replace MALSR Threshold Fixture EA 36 $1,000.00 $36,000.00 $850.00 $30,600.00 $676.00 $24,336.00 64 L-125-5.7 L-868 Light Base Can for RWCL or TDZ EA 377 $950.00 $358,150.00 $850.00 $320,450.00 $832.00 $313,664.00 65 L-125-5.8 Relocate Lighted Sign Twice - Temporary EA 18 $1,000.00 $18,000.00 $1,700.00 $30,600.00 $1,248.00 $22,464.00 66 L-125-5.9 Relocate Lighted Sign - Permanent EA 12 $1,500.00 $18,000.00 $2,300.00 $27,600.00 $1,300.00 $15,600.00 67 L-125-5.10 Relocate RW Edge Light Twice EA 67 $750.00 $50,250.00 $600.00 $40,200.00 $426.40 $28,568.80 68 L-125-5.11 Adjust PAPI's LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,640.00 $3,640.00 69 L-125-5.12 MALSR Bar PCC Housekeeping Pad EA 2 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $13,000.00 $26,000.00 $10,200.00 $20,400.00 70 T-901-5.1-1 Permanent Seeding and Mulching MSF 940 $46.00 $43,240.00 $30.00 $28,200.00 $35.36 $33,238.40 71 T-901-5.1-2 Temporary Seeding and Mulching MSF 940 $34.00 $31,960.00 $22.00 $20,680.00 $16.64 $15,641.60 72 T-904-5.1 Sodding SY 22,813 $5.00 $114,065.00 $4.00 $91,252.00 $5.98 $136,421.74 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL = $15,533,980.88 $14,256,033.97 $15,182,845.74 Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 4 Item # 18 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Ordinance Relating to Parking Violations and Enforcement Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Motion to approve an Ordinance to amend the Augusta, Georgia Code Article Twelve, Sections 3-5-92 through 3-5-95.1 relating to parking violations and enforcement; to add new Sections 3-5-95.2 through 3-5- 95.24; to allow the Downtown Development Authority to enforce parking violations and use collected funds for revitalization in Augusta; to repeal all Ordinances and parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith; to provide an effective date and for other purposes. (Approved by Administrative Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 5 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 6 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 7 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 8 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 9 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 10 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 11 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 12 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 13 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 14 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 15 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 16 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 17 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 18 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 19 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 20 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 21 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 22 of 23 Item # 19 Attachment number 1 Page 23 of 23 Item # 19 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Automated Firing Range System Department:Richmond County Sheriff's Office Caption:Motion to approve the purchase of an Automated Firing Range System for the Richmond County Sheriff's Training Range Facility for $86,214.00.00, lowest bid on bid #10-148. (Approved by Public Safety Committee September 13, 2010) Background:The Richmond County Sheriff's Office (RCSO) is requesting to replace the pneumatic firing range system currently in service at the training facility. The current pneumatic system requires frequent maintenance and is no longer supported by the vendor. Analysis:RCSO submitted a request for bids through the Procurement Department utilizing the Demand Star electronic bid sytem, which offers nationwide bid coverage. The Procurement Department received one bid that met requirements which was from, Action Target 1281 West 200 North, Provo, UT 84601. Financial Impact:Funds for the purchase are avaiable in the 2009/2010 RCSO Capital Budget. Alternatives:None Recommendation:Approve purchase of Automated Firing Range System for $86,214.00 (lowest bid #10-148) from Action Target 1281 West 200 North, Provo, UT 84601. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: This funding is in account # 272-03-1410-54-12110. (2010 budget) REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 20 Invitation To Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until 11:00 a.m. Friday, August 20, 2010 for furnishing: Bid Item #10-148 Automated Firing Range System for Sheriff’s Office Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 706-821-2422 Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. All questions are to be submitted in writing by Tuesday, August 10, 2010 by 5:00 p.m. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference on an eligible local project, the certification statement as a local bidder and all supporting documents must be submitted to the Procurement Department with your bonafide bid package. No Bid may be withdrawn for a period of 90 days after time has been called on the date of opening. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia does not operate a DBE, MBE or WBE Program but rather pursuant to its code of ordinances, this local government operates instead a Local Small Business Opportunity Program. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle July 15, 22, 29, August 5, 2010 Metro Courier July 21, 2010 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Ronnie Strength Sheriff’s Office Mary Ann Gibbs Sheriff’s Office Robert Partain Sheriff’s Office Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 20 Ve n d o r s AC T I O N T A R G E T 12 8 1 W e s t 2 0 0 N o r t h PR O V O , U T 8 4 6 0 1 Pa t r i o t R a n g e Te c h n o l o g i e s 79 2 8 S M a d i s o n S t Bu r r R i d g e , I L 6 0 5 2 7 Ad v a n c e d T r a i n i n g Sy s t e m s 45 2 4 H i g h w a y 6 1 N Wh i t e B e a r L a k e , M N 55 1 1 0 Sa v a g e R a n g e S y s t e m s 10 0 S p r i n g d a l e R o a d We s t f i e l d , M A 0 1 0 8 5 Be a c o n T a r g e t T u r n e r 20 5 1 9 L e m b c k e R o a d Ha r v a r d , I L 6 0 0 3 3 At t a c h m e n t B Ye s Bi d d e r ' s F o r m / Ac k n o w l e d g e m e n t of A d d e n d a Ye s To t a l B i d P r i c e $8 6 , 2 1 4 . 0 0 De l i v e r y D a t e 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 0 Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 4 8 Au t o m a t e d F i r i n g R a n g e T a r g e t S y s t e m fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - S h e r i f f ' s D e p a r t m e n t Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : F r i d a y , A u g u s t 2 0 , 2 0 1 0 @ 1 1 : 0 0 a . m . Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 20 Item # 20 Item # 20 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 2 Item # 20 Attachment number 4 Page 2 of 2 Item # 20 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Sentinel Offender Services Contract Amendment Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Motion to approve a request from Sentinel Offender Services to amend their contract to allow them to sub-contract with ARSS (American Recovery Solution Services) in the collection of fines/fees on outstanding probation violation warrants. (Approved by Public Safety Committee September 13, 2010) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 21 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 21 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Approve Funding for August 10, 2010 Runoff Department:Board of Elections Caption:Motion to approve funding for the August 10, 2010 Runoff. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Background:The runoff was held on August 10, 2010 as a result of the July 20, 2010 General Primary. Analysis:The conduct of the runoff was conditional upon the results if the July 20, 2010 General Primary and was not funded as a part of the regular budget Financial Impact:$54,500 Alternatives:None Recommendation:Approve funding Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: Contingency or Fund Balance 101101110 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 22 ELECTION COST WORKSHEET General Primary Runoff August 10, 2010 ITEM TOTAL COST Poll Worker Salary 37,500.00 Poll Worker Training 0 Cell Phones 500.00 Testing of Equipment 2,000.00 Temporary Employees (Daily) 3,000.00 Election Night Workers and Delivery Crew 3,000.00 Security 150.00 Staff Overtime/Comp Hours 0 Custodial Pay 1,150.00 Building Rental 3,400.00 Truck Rental 2,000.00 Printing – Absentee Ballots 3,500.00 Food 200.00 Mileage 100.00 Board Pay 1,000.00 Advertising 0 Postage – Absentee/Poll Worker 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $54,500.00 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 22 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Asociacion Cultural Hispanoamericana Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Motion to approve a request from the Asociacion Cultural Hispanoamericana for the City to provide the use of the Augusta Common at no cost for the 18th Annual Hispanic Festival. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 23 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 3 Item # 23 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 3 Item # 23 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 3 Item # 23 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Replacement of EMA Dive Team Boat Department:Emergency Management Agency Caption:Motion to approve the replacement of EMA Dive Team Boat. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Background:At this time the Dive Team has not got a boat. The engine on the Remaining Boat was 18 years old and would not be cost effective to rebuild. Also the old boat was to small for operation with divers and equipment and safety divers. Analysis:Sec. 1-10-50. Emergency procurement selection method. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, the Procurement Director, Augusta- Richmond County Administrator or constitutional officer may make or authorize others to make emergency procurement of equipment, supplies, services, general construction, or public works type construction services when there exists a threat to public health, welfare, or safety, or where daily operations are affected; provided that such emergency procurement shall be made with such competition as is practicable under the circumstances. As soon as practicable, a record of each emergency procurement shall be made and shall set forth the contractor's name, the amount and type of the contract, a listing of the item(s) procured under the contract, and the identification number of the contract file. A written report explaining the determination of the basis for the emergency and for the selection of the particular contractor shall be included in the contract file, and a copy of same provided the Augusta-Richmond County Commission at their next regular meeting in the case of public works contracts as defined by Georgia State Law or other Augusta-Richmond County purchases when the value of the purchase exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). In the event an emergency should arise after office hours or on holidays or weekends which requires immediate action on the part of the using agency involved and where it is not possible or convenient to reach the Procurement Director, constitutional officer, or Administrator, the using agency head is authorized to make purchases. Such purchases shall be well documented, packaged for payment, and forwarded to the Procurement Director within twenty-four (24) hours, if possible, after o Financial Impact: Alternatives:None Recommendation:Replace the Boat Cover Memo Item # 24 Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 272-03-9215/5422910 272-03-9215/5316210 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 24 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 6 Item # 24 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 6 Item # 24 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 6 Item # 24 Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 6 Item # 24 Attachment number 1 Page 5 of 6 Item # 24 Attachment number 1 Page 6 of 6 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 9 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 2 of 9 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 3 of 9 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 4 of 9 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 5 of 9 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 6 of 9 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 7 of 9 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 8 of 9 Item # 24 Attachment number 2 Page 9 of 9 Item # 24 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Substance Abuse Policy Updates Department:Finance/Risk Management Division Caption:Motion to approve 1) additional category for Random Testing under Substance Abuse Policy for both Full-Time and Part-time Security Officer positions, Section 1.4.16.21 2) FTA/DOT update on drug testing panel, Section 1.8.1.3.5 and 1.8.1.3.8. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Background:(1) Security officers are required to submit to a physical, a polygraph and a pre-employment drug screen prior to hiring. Following the hiring process there is currently no follow-up on these employees’ in the way of random testing for illegal drug usage. Since the nature of their job places those in a position to maintain the security and safety of others these positions should be added to Augusta’s Substance Abuse Policy for random testing. There will be approximately 55 to 60 security officer positions which will include positions for the new Judicial Center. (2) FTA/DOT (TRANSIT) regulation changes involve changes to the drug testing panel. The new regulation, effective October 1, 2010 will now include an initial test for Acetylmorphine (Heroin detector) and initial/confirmatory test for MDMA (Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, i.e. ecstasy). For consistency in testing this new panel will be used for all employees. Analysis:NA Financial Impact:For additional safety sensitive positions the cost is expected to be minimal cost - expected to cost less than $3,000/year. Current annual budget is sufficient to cover this additional testing. The cost for adding the two new substances to the drug testing process is currently unknown but is not expected to exceed the current budget for 2010 and requested budget for 2011. Alternatives:Additions to safety sensitive listing - do not approve, use reasonable suspicion testing as method for determining possible abuse. FTA/DOT updates - no alternative for those under Augusta Public Transit. Alternative for other non-DOT safety sensitive positions is not to add these substances to the drug testing panel. Recommendation:Add full-time and part-time security officer positions as a new category for random testing under Augusta’s substance abuse program. Approve new FTA/DOT drug testing panel for all employees. Funds are Available in Cover Memo Item # 25 the Following Accounts:611015210 5212999 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Risk Management Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 25 PDFConvert.13874.1.Security Officer.doc Augusta-Richmond County Job Description Approved Title: Deputy (Non-Certified) Job Code: Title: Security Officer Overtime: Non-exempt Department: Marshal’s Department Date Prepared: October 10, 2000 Reports to: Sergeant (Security Division) Job Grade: 41 GENERAL SUMMARY: Provides security within the guidelines of supervisory instructions and policies and procedures. Reports to the Duty Officer or other designated person and works with co-workers, employees, law enforcement personnel, and the public to secure facilities. PRINCIPAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Enforces Department policies regarding access to and security of complex. 2. Operates screening equipment to maintain secure environment. 3. Conducts regular patrols of the building and grounds. 4. Maintains log of all incidents during shift. 5. Serves as a resource to subordinate personnel. 6. Other responsibilities as assigned by supervisor. REQUIREMENTS Education: High School diploma, trade school, or equivalent level of education. Experience: 3-5 years in similar position or sufficient experience to perform principal duties and responsibilities, usually associated with completion of apprenticeship/internship. Knowledge/Skills/Abilities: • Familiarity with departmental policies and procedures related to security measures. • Good communication skills, both oral and written. • Demonstrated ability to work independently and follow instructions. Other: • May supervise and/or train designated subordinate personnel. • Posses or have ability to obtain a valid state operator/driver’s license for the type vehicle or equipment operated. PHYSICAL DEMANDS Intermittent sitting, standing, stooping, crouching, walking, and occasional lifting of light and heavy objects. Work is performed in buildings and outdoors with exposure to inclement weather when making rounds. Must be able to restrain persons in life- threatening situations and distinguish between shades of color. DISCLAIMER The preceding job description has been designed to indicate the general nature and level of work performed by employees within this classification. It is not designed to contain or be interpreted as a comprehensive inventory of all duties, responsibilities, and qualifications required of employees to this job. REVIEW/APPROVALS ______________________________________________________ ______________________ Employee Date ______________________________________________________ ______________________ Administration Staff Date Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 25 PDFConvert.13875.1.Security Officer - part time.doc Augusta-Richmond County Job Description Approved Title: Deputy (Non-Certified) Job Code: Title: Security Officer - (Part time) Salary - $11.61 per/hour Department: Marshal’s Department Reports to: Sergeant (Security Division) GENERAL SUMMARY: Provides security within the guidelines of supervisory instructions and policies and procedures. Reports to the Duty Officer or other designated person and works with co-workers, employees, law enforcement personnel, and the public to secure facilities. PRINCIPAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Enforces Department policies regarding access to and security of complex. 2. Operates screening equipment to maintain secure environment. 3. Conducts regular patrols of the building and grounds. 4. Maintains log of all incidents during shift. 5. Serves as a resource to subordinate personnel. 6. Other responsibilities as assigned by supervisor. REQUIREMENTS Education: High School diploma, trade school, or equivalent level of education. Experience: 3-5 years in similar position or sufficient experience to perform principal duties and responsibilities, usually associated with completion of apprenticeship/internship. Knowledge/Skills/Abilities: • Familiarity with departmental policies and procedures related to security measures. • Good communication skills, both oral and written. • Demonstrated ability to work independently and follow instructions. Other: • May supervise and/or train designated subordinate personnel. • May be required to maintain an “on-call” status. • Posses or have ability to obtain a valid state operator/driver’s license for the type vehicle or equipment operated. PHYSICAL DEMANDS Intermittent sitting, standing, stooping, crouching, walking, and occasional lifting of light and heavy objects. Work is performed in buildings and outdoors with exposure to inclement weather when making rounds. Must be able to restrain persons in life- threatening situations and distinguish between shades of color. DISCLAIMER The preceding job description has been designed to indicate the general nature and level of work performed by employees within this classification. It is not designed to contain or be interpreted as a comprehensive inventory of all duties, responsibilities, and qualifications required of employees to this job. REVIEW/APPROVALS ______________________________________________________ ______________________ Employee Date ______________________________________________________ ______________________ Administration Staff Date Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 25 49850 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations negotiated basis) to determine the nature and extent of required repairs. (2) Upon determination by the Contracting Officer of what work is necessary, the Contractor, if requested by the Contracting Officer, shall negotiate prices for performance of that work. The prices agreed upon shall be set forth in a modification of the job order. (3) Failure of the parties to agree upon the price shall constitute a dispute under the Disputes clause. In the meantime, the Contractor shall diligently proceed to perform the work ordered. (End of clause) [FR Doc. 2010–20168 Filed 8–13–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–08–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary 49 CFR Part 40 [Docket OST–2010–0026] RIN 2105–AD95 Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation (the Department or DOT) is amending certain provisions of its drug testing procedures dealing with laboratory testing of urine specimens. Some of the changes will also affect the training of and procedures used by Medical Review Officers. The changes are intended to create consistency with many, but not all, of the new requirements established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. DATES: This rule is effective October 1, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Snider, Senior Policy Advisor (S– 1), Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone number 202–366–3784 (voice), 202–366–3897 (fax), or mark.snider@dot.gov (e-mail). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background and Purpose On November 25, 2008 (73 FR 7185), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) issued a Final Notice of Revisions to the HHS Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs (HHS Mandatory Guidelines) that included changes to the procedures for collection and testing of urine specimens, creation of and requirements for the certification of Instrumented Initial Test Facilities (IITFs), collection site oversight requirements, and changes to the role of and standards for collectors and Medical Review Officers (MROs). The HHS Mandatory Guidelines were to become effective May 1, 2010, but on April 30, 2010 (75 FR 22809), HHS postponed implementation until October 1, 2010. On February 4, 2010, DOT published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) (75 FR 5722) seeking comments about changing part 40 to be consistent with certain aspects of the HHS Mandatory Guidelines. The final rule responds to the comments and makes a number of changes to the existing rules governing the Department’s drug testing program. Principal Policy Issues Requirements of the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 Several commenters questioned whether and to what extent the Department must follow the HHS Mandatory Guidelines. Some commenters urged the Department to choose a different approach from the HHS regarding the drugs for which testing occurs, the initial testing of all specimens for 6–Acetylmorphine (6– AM), and the use of IITFs. Although since its passage, the Department has cited the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991, 49 U.S.C. 31300, et seq., 49 U.S.C. 20100, et seq., 49 U.S.C. 5330, et seq., and 49 U.S.C. 45100, et seq. (Omnibus Act), as the definitive authority for our reliance on the HHS Mandatory Guidelines for scientific testing issues, several of the commenters have challenged this or otherwise asked the Department to clarify what the Omnibus Act requires. Even before the Omnibus Act, the Department looked to the HHS Mandatory Guidelines for guidance on scientific matters. In a 1988 Interim Final Rule (IFR) the Department relied upon the HHS for testing methodologies to determine the drugs for which testing would be done and which laboratories to use. Specifically, the Department noted that under ‘‘the HHS Guidelines, a Federal agency may test a urine sample only for certain specified drugs. The Department’s Procedures echo this requirement.’’ (53 FR 47002, Nov. 21, 1988; emphasis in the original) In the same IFR, the Department required regulated transportation employers to use only laboratories certified under the HHS Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs. While deciding to utilize many aspects of the HHS Mandatory Guidelines, the Department acknowledged ‘‘that the Guidelines, as written by HHS to apply to testing by Federal agencies, do not fit perfectly the circumstances of employers regulated by DOT * * *. Obviously, the circumstances of industries regulated by DOT are very different from those of Federal agencies.’’ (53 FR 47002) Thus, the Department began to lay the foundation for using the technical expertise of the HHS for the scientific aspects of DOT’s testing program while relying upon the Department’s own authority and that of DOT agencies to tailor many procedural aspects of DOT testing to fit the transportation industries. In a 1989 final rule, we discussed the applicability of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution to both the Federal agency programs covered by the HHS Mandatory Guidelines and the testing that transportation employers would conduct in response to the Department’s requirements. The Department acknowledged that the HHS Mandatory Guidelines had passed Constitutional scrutiny by the Federal courts, all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Federal courts concluded that HHS had met the Fourth Amendment balancing of the Federal need to ensure safety by drug testing versus individuals’ strong interests in their right to privacy. The HHS Mandatory Guidelines had set up a testing system with sound methodology that ensured privacy and accuracy. Given these considerations, the Department decided to rely on HHS for the science of DOT’s testing program and for the drugs for which we test, the testing methodologies, and the integrity of the HHS certified laboratories. (54 FR 49854, Dec. 1, 1989) Congress endorsed the Department’s decision by explicitly directing, in the Omnibus Act, the Department to incorporate the HHS scientific and technical guidelines for laboratories and testing procedures for controlled substances. The Omnibus Act specifically requires that we incorporate the HHS scientific and technical guidelines that ‘‘establish comprehensive standards for all aspects of laboratory controlled substances testing’’ in order to ensure full reliability and accuracy in testing. [49 U.S.C. 31306(c)(2)(A), 49 U.S.C. 20140(c)(2)(A), 49 U.S.C. 5331(d)(2)(A) and 49 U.S.C. 45104(2)(A)] The legislative history for the Omnibus Act indicates the following intent: ‘‘Incorporating the HHS VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 15 Item # 25 49851 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations guidelines relating to laboratory standards and procedures for testing controlled substances, as proposed by the reported bill and as DOT has done in part 40 of title 49 CFR, as it exists at this writing, is an essential component of the procedural safeguard.’’ Senate Report 102–54, Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991, Report of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation on S.676, 102nd Congress, 1st Session, May 2, 1991, page 26 (Senate Report 102–54) (emphasis added). The Omnibus Act also requires the Department and DOT agencies to look to the HHS for laboratory certification, the procedures for reviewing laboratories for certification, and the procedures for the revocation of such certification. In addition, the Department must follow the HHS Mandatory Guidelines regarding establishing the list of drugs for which we test and the procedures for use of the Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form (CCF) to establish the chain of custody of specimens. The legislative history of the Omnibus Act indicates that Congress wanted the Department and DOT agencies to continue use of the HHS scientific and technical guidelines and the HHS certified laboratories to ensure accuracy, fairness, and the constitutionality of DOT’s drug testing program. While the Omnibus Act was being drafted, opponents of drug testing warned that employees were in danger of ‘‘false positives’’ that would result from initial screening of urine that might indicate levels of illegal drugs. The Senate noted that it had addressed this concern: ‘‘By incorporating laboratory certification and testing procedures developed by HHS and DOT and by providing for the subdivision of specimens and the opportunity for an independent test of positive samples, the Committee has taken affirmative steps to ensure accuracy.’’ Senate Report 102–54, pages 6–7. The legislative history for the Omnibus Act makes numerous additional references to the understanding that the Department would work with HHS to ensure testing accuracy. There is also clear indication in the legislative history that Congress recognized that the HHS standards were likely to be modified over time. The Omnibus Act itself explicitly refers to incorporating the HHS ‘‘scientific and technical guidelines dated April 11, 1988, and any subsequent amendments thereto * * *’’ 49 U.S.C. 31306(c)(2), 49 U.S.C. 20140(c)(2), 49 U.S.C. 5331(d)(2) and 49 U.S.C. 45104(2). Allowing for subsequent amendments, however, did not mean that Congress wanted to lower the standards for testing. ‘‘Realizing that these guidelines possibly are subject to future modification, the Committee has acted to specify that the basic elements of certain provisions now in effect are mandated, including the need for comprehensive standards and procedures for all aspects of laboratory testing of drugs, the establishment of a minimum list of controlled substances for which employees may be tested, the establishment of standards and procedures for the periodic review of laboratories, and the development of criteria for laboratory certification.’’ Senate Report 102–54, pages 21–22, 26 and 32. When the Omnibus Act requires the Department to follow HHS on specified scientific matters, we adhere to the requirements. When the Omnibus Act allows the Department the option of following HHS, we have always and will continue to weigh the costs and benefits of following HHS in light of our mission. However, when the Omnibus Act specifically requires the Department to take a direction different from that which HHS takes, then the Department is prohibited from following HHS on such matters. In reviewing the Omnibus Act, its legislative history, and the regulatory history of the Department’s testing program, it remains clear that, since the inception of our program, the Department has been tied to HHS for the scientific methodology, for identification of the drugs for which we will require testing; the certified laboratories we are to use; and the technical expertise for certifying and decertifying laboratories. These are the core scientific laboratory functions necessary for the Department’s program. However, it is important to note that the Department has discretion concerning many other aspects of the regulations governing testing in the transportation industries’ regulated programs. As far back as 1988, our regulations established the fundamental roles and concepts for the current DOT regulated industry testing program. Our early regulations established how collections were to be done, who could be an MRO or a Substance Abuse Professional (SAP), and the respective training for and responsibilities of these important gatekeepers. While relying on HHS for certain scientific efforts, we did not necessarily follow HHS regarding collection issues, laboratory reporting requirements, how MROs handle certain test results, the rehabilitation and the return-to-duty process, and other areas covered by the HHS Mandatory Guidelines. The Department’s regulation and the regulations of DOT agencies set their own processes and procedures for all aspects leading up to and through specimen collection and then picking up from what processes and procedures would occur after a laboratory confirmed a drug test result, including the return-to-duty process for individuals who have non-negative test results. In shaping our program to fit the needs of the transportation industries, the Department and DOT agencies have made adaptations to meet the changing needs of the transportation industries. In some cases we have consequently chosen a different path from the one chosen by HHS on the same or similar non-scientific issues. The Omnibus Act acknowledged that such Departmental and DOT agency regulations were in place with respect to non-scientific issues. Congress explicitly allowed these regulations to continue in effect, with the option for the Department and DOT agencies to amend or further supplement their respective regulations in the future. 49 U.S.C. 31306(i), 49 U.S.C. 20140(f), and 49 U.S.C. 45106(c). One example of the Department’s divergence from HHS on non-scientific matters covered in the HHS Mandatory Guidelines is the issue of how to conduct direct observation collections. On June 25, 2008, the Department issued a final rule (73 FR 35961) that, among other amendments, modified 49 CFR part 40 at section 40.67(b) and added a new paragraph 40.67(i) to improve direct observation procedures to better address known adulteration and substitution threats. Although HHS addresses direct observation collections in the HHS Mandatory Guidelines, the Department chose to use a different procedure because of evidence regarding cheating and our experience in regulating the transportation industries. In explaining our rationale, we noted that the use of direct observation collections is ‘‘a very significant tool the Department employs to combat attempts by employees to cheat on their tests.’’ (74 FR 37949, July 30, 2009) In addition, we stated in the final rule reinstating the direct observation provisions after the court victory, ‘‘the Department remains convinced that conducting all return-to- duty and follow-up tests under direct observation is the most prudent course from the viewpoint of safety.’’ (74 FR 37950, quoting the October 22, 2008 final rule preamble at 73 FR 62918) The Department’s regulations concerning direct observation procedures were affirmed by a unanimous court. (BNSF Railway Company v. Department of VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 2 of 15 Item # 25 49852 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations Transportation, 566 F.3d 200 (DC Cir. 2009) In upholding the rule, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit noted that the Department had experience, comments, and evidence to support the need to make the improvements to the direct observation procedures. BNSF Railway Company v. Department of Transportation, 566 F.3d at 204. The Court further found that the improved procedures were constitutional, stating, ‘‘[g]iven the combination of the vital importance of transportation safety, the employees’ participation in a pervasively regulated industry, their prior violations of the drug regulations, and the ease of obtaining cheating devices capable of defeating standard testing procedures, we find the challenged regulations facially valid under the Fourth Amendment.’’ Id. at 208. Hence, the Department chose a different approach from HHS on direct observation procedures, tailored them to the needs identified, and the Court upheld this approach as constitutional. Some of the commenters asked the Department to consider deviating from the HHS Mandatory Guidelines regarding the drugs for which testing is required. Some commenters want the Department to exclude Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) from the list of drugs, while others want the Department to include synthetic opiates, and others want alternative testing methodologies to be employed. It is not unusual for the Department to receive requests from commenters to move away from the illegal drugs for which HHS has set the protocols; however, the Department has remained consistent in our responses and our reliance upon HHS as the scientific experts in these matters. What the Department stated in response to similar requests in the late 1990s to move beyond the HHS minimums still remains true: ‘‘This is a long-standing issue in the program, and DOT continues to take the position that we ought not to go beyond the testing that HHS has authorized and for which HHS has certified laboratories.’’ (65 FR 79484, Dec. 19, 2000) In response to those who have urged DOT to go beyond the drugs for which HHS tests, we have consistently stated: ‘‘we believe the stability and reliability of the program are well served by limiting testing to the ‘HHS five.’ HHS has established testing protocols and cutoffs for these drugs, and laboratories are subject to HHS certification for testing of these five drugs. This is not true for other drugs.’’ (65 FR 79491, Dec. 19, 2000) Although the HHS has now expanded its panel to include an additional amphetamine, MDMA, the same reasoning holds true and the Department will continue to follow the HHS testing protocols for the reasons we explained in 2000. Also in 2000, the Department explained, ‘‘With respect to alternative testing technologies such as hair testing, saliva testing, and on-site testing, which commenters recommended in context of several sections of the NPRM, the Department will wait upon the action of HHS before proposing to incorporate additional methods. Approval of these or other methods, and establishment of requirements and procedures for them, are matters primarily within the expertise of HHS.’’ (65 FR 79489, Dec. 19, 2000) Furthermore, in the preamble to our Specimen Validity Testing final rule in 2008 (SVT Final Rule), we stated that the Omnibus Act ‘‘provides only one way to determine that an employee has tested positive for illicit drug use— a drug test confirmed by an HHS- certified laboratory using HHS scientific and testing protocols and verified by an MRO.’’ (73 FR 35966, June 25, 2008) The Department, as required by the Omnibus Act, has consistently specifically followed HHS on laboratory certification matters, but we have also created responsibilities for laboratories under part 40 that do not impinge upon the scientific and technical aspects of drug testing. As the Department stated in 2000, ‘‘laboratories have responsibilities under part 40 independent of their HHS responsibilities (e.g., with respect to relationships with MROs, release of information, and validity testing), and laboratories must be accountable to DOT in those matters.’’ (65 FR 79484, Dec. 19, 2000) At times, we have had to adapt certain aspects of technical drug testing matters to fit the needs of the transportation industries. For example, in 2003, the Department issued an interim final rule (2003 IFR) concerning laboratory substitution criteria. (68 FR 31624, May 28, 2003) In the 2003 IFR, we did not, and could not, change the HHS- established laboratory testing substitution criteria, but instead addressed how laboratories were to report out their findings to the MROs on the CCF, what subsequent actions would be required of the MROs with respect to the reported result, and whether to tell the employer to send the employee back in for a direct observation collection. In short, we said that specimens reported by laboratories as substituted with creatinine concentration in the 2–5 ng/mL range would not be considered by MROs to be refusals to test. Instead, transportation employees with such results would require immediate recollections under direct observation. In a July 2008 interpretation, which is being incorporated in this final rule at section 40.159, the Department instructed MROs on how to ‘‘handle laboratory results reported as invalid because of pH greater than or equal to 9.0 but less than or equal to 9.5.’’ This is another example of how the Department has adapted the HHS scientific requirements established for laboratories to the needs of the transportation industries. In fact, the HHS Mandatory Guidelines have adopted our MRO provisions for invalids due to pH in the 9.0–9.5 range. We read the Omnibus Act to require the Department to follow the HHS on the drugs for which we test and the testing protocols, but the Omnibus Act allows us to, and we have chosen to, diverge from the HHS and the HHS Mandatory Guidelines on collections, MROs, and what laboratories can report. As we said in our 2008 SVT Final Rule preamble, ‘‘Since Congress specifically limited the scientific testing methodology upon which DOT can rely in making its drug and alcohol testing regulations; we follow the HHS scientific and technical guidelines, including the amendments to their Mandatory Guidelines.’’ (73 FR 35961, June 25, 2008) In the 2008 SVT Final Rule, we also explained that the ‘‘Omnibus Act requires the DOT to incorporate the HHS scientific and technical guidelines, and we do not have the authority to impose additional scientific and technical requirements upon the laboratories.’’ (73 FR 35963, June 25, 2008) In response to the commenters who would like us to consider alternative specimens such as hair testing and point of collection testing, we reiterate what we said in response to comments on our direct observation final rule in late 2008: ‘‘The Department is not opposed to the use of alternative, less intrusive, testing methods as a means of accomplishing the safety purposes of the program while preventing individuals from cheating. Under the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991, however, the Department is authorized to use only testing methods that have been approved by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). To date, HHS has not approved any specimen testing except urine.’’ (73 FR 62917, Oct. 22, 2008) Therefore, we cannot consider alternative specimens at this particular point in time. In fact, DOT would not desire to do so without the HHS VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 3 of 15 Item # 25 49853 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations scientific and laboratory certification processes being in place. Several commenters have asked us to explain how the Omnibus Act affects the Department’s determination of whether it will and will not follow HHS. In response, as we explained above, where the Omnibus Act requires the Department to follow the HHS—for the laboratory and testing procedures, the Department will follow the scientific and technical aspects prescribed by the HHS. Where the Omnibus Act limits or otherwise prohibits the Department from following the HHS, the Department must decline to follow the lead of the HHS. For example, when HHS did not embrace a split specimen requirement, the Department departed from the HHS Mandatory Guidelines due to the Omnibus Act’s requirements for split specimens. Where the HHS takes a position that we are neither required to follow nor prohibited from following, the Department will continue to view the HHS position as optional. We recognize that the HHS has expertise in the Federal employee testing program for these optional matters, but the Department has its own expertise as the regulator of the largest workplace drug and alcohol testing program in the world. As such, we will consider the optional matters in light of transportation safety, the costs and benefits to our regulated industries, and scientific and forensic considerations. Use of Instrumented Initial Test Facilities In our NPRM, we proposed allowing DOT employers to choose between full service laboratories and IITFs. An IITF would be able to provide results to employers only for negative and certain negative dilute specimens, as well as specimens they reject for testing. All other specimens would be forwarded to an HHS certified, full service laboratory. We requested comments as to how this process would impact the industry, specifically employers. The majority of commenters felt that use of IITFs would be detrimental to the turnaround time for reporting of non-negative results and most did not favor use of IITFs. Other commenters believed IITFs would be very useful, accurate, and afford the ability for a rapid turnaround time for their negative results. DOT Response The Omnibus Act actually prohibits the Department from following HHS on the issue of IITFs. The Omnibus Act requires ‘‘that all laboratories involved in the controlled substances testing of any individual under this section shall have the capability and facility, at such laboratory, of performing screening and confirmation tests.’’ (49 U.S.C. 31306(c)(3), 49 U.S.C. 20140(c)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5331(d)(3) and 49 U.S.C. 45104(3)) An IITF can conduct the initial screening for drugs in a urine specimen, but is not certified to provide a confirmation test. Since IITFs do not have any confirmation testing capabilities, the Department must not use them in part 40. The Senate Report for S. 676, the bill that subsequently became the Omnibus Act, indicates the intent behind this requirement was to ensure that ‘‘[a]ny testing program would be required to include procedures to protect individual privacy, incorporate laboratory certification and testing procedures developed by [HHS] * * * require that all laboratories involved in testing for drugs have the capability of performing screening and confirmation tests at such laboratory.’’ Senate Report 102–54, pages 10–11. Because IITFs do not offer confirmation testing, the Department is prohibited by the Omnibus Act from using laboratory facilities that lack the capability to perform both screening and confirmation tests. Therefore, DOT employers do not have the option of using IITFs. For this reason there are no provisions in this final rule for IITFs, and they will not be authorized for use in DOT’s program by our regulated employers. MDMA Testing In the NPRM, we proposed to incorporate testing for MDMA into part 40. Comments A majority of commenters favored testing for MDMA. A few commenters indicated that their data showed that there would be relatively few positive test results, creating an unnecessary cost burden to employers. One laboratory group opposed the inclusion of MDMA and suggested the Department test instead for ‘‘hydromorphone, hydrocodone, oxycodone, and oxymorphone.’’ Those who favored testing MDMA represented a wide range of interests— MRO groups, third-party administrators, a major employer association, a major service agent association, among them. Most who supported testing for MDMA said that many employers were already testing for MDMA in their non-DOT testing programs. They supported putting MDMA testing into the Federal testing arena. Some commenters presented information about the use of MDMA, saying that MDMA was no longer a threat; MDMA is strictly a drug for younger persons; MDMA is a ‘‘club’’ drug that is not being used by transportation employees. Others presented data showing that MDMA use is on the rise and the implication is that the threat of MDMA use will become greater as the current transportation population is replaced via attrition by a younger population. DOT Response In this rulemaking, we are adopting the HHS laboratory testing requirements of conducting initial testing for MDMA, conducting confirmatory testing for MDMA, Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), and Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA). As we stated in our NPRM, regarding such matters, ‘‘past experience has shown that DOT has never deviated from HHS on laboratory testing matters—the drugs for which we test, the specimens we test, specimen validity testing values, initial and confirmatory cutoff values, and laboratory testing processes and procedures, among others. The DOT is required by the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 to adhere with the HHS on these important laboratory testing matters.’’ (75 FR 5722– 5723, Feb. 4, 2010) We can provide additional guidance to MROs, as appropriate, so that these changes fit the transportation industries. However, we do not read our authority as allowing us to depart from HHS on this subject. Aside from the fact that the Omnibus Act requires us to test the drugs for which HHS labs are certified to test, we note that, as some commenters said, MDMA is not just a ‘‘club drug’’ any more, it is being marketed to a much larger population in American communities. The Department of Justice National Drug Intelligence Center’s 2010 National Drug Threat Assessment (http:// www.justice.gov/ndic/pubs38/38661/ 38661p.pdf) supports DOT’s conclusion with regard to MDMA availability, finding: ‘‘Asian DTOs [Drug Trafficking Organizations] are responsible for a resurgence in MDMA availability in the United States, particularly since 2005. These groups produce large quantities of the drug in Canada and smuggle it into the United States across the Northern Border. The smuggling of MDMA into the United States from Canada fueled an increase in the availability of the drug that began in 2005, although availability appears to be stabilizing. Data regarding MDMA availability are limited; nonetheless, analysis of National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) data shows a 76 percent increase in the number of MDMA submissions from 2005 to 2008, although VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 4 of 15 Item # 25 49854 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations MDMA submissions make up a much smaller percentage of submissions than other illicit drugs, including cannabis, cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin. National Drug Threat Survey (NDTS) data also provide an indication of MDMA availability. The percentage of state and local law enforcement agencies that reported moderate or high availability of MDMA in their areas increased from 47.2 percent in 2005 to 51.5 percent in 2009. Seizure data show that the amount of MDMA seized along the U.S.-Canada border increased 156 percent from 2007 to 2008 and that more MDMA was seized at the Northern Border in 2008 than in any year since 2005. MDMA seizure totals declined in 2009 but still exceeded 2007 totals. Although most Northern Border seizures occur at POEs (Points of Entry), the amount of MDMA seized between POEs appears to be increasing, likely because increased scrutiny at POEs has forced smugglers to develop new routes and smuggling methods in an attempt to circumvent law enforcement. For example, in 2008, more than 243,000 dosage units of MDMA were seized between POEs, compared with none the previous year; seizures between POEs in 2009 exceeded those in 2008. MDMA seizures along the Southwest Border and through commercial air have also increased, albeit on a much smaller scale. Seizures at or near the Southwest Border show an increase from 114,286 dosage units in 2006 to 387,143 dosage units in 2009. Furthermore, commercial air seizures spiked in 2008, with a 91.4 percent increase from 2007 to 2008 (433,571 dosage units to 829,857 dosage units); MDMA commercial air seizure totals for 2009 decreased, resulting in levels comparable to 2007 levels. Ready availability of MDMA has enabled distributors to expand their customer base to include new user groups, most notably African American and Hispanic users. Asian DTOs have begun distributing MDMA to African American and Hispanic street gangs, which distribute the drug along with other illicit drugs in markets throughout the United States, most notably in the Southeast, Southwest, and Great Lakes Regions. Moreover, MDMA is no longer exclusively viewed as a ‘‘rave’’ or club drug, which also aids distributors in selling it to nontraditional abusers.’’ One laboratory group urged DOT to require testing prescription medications and synthetic drugs, rather than MDMA. While DOT shares the group’s concern about unauthorized use of the prescription medications and the use of synthetic drugs, testing for prescription medications and synthetic drug and testing for MDMA are separate issues. As part of their non-DOT testing programs, regulated employers can test for prescription medications or synthetic drugs and in many instances it may be appropriate to do so. Some DOT agencies and the United States Coast Guard (USCG), for instance, have medical qualification standards— for Commercial Drivers License holders, certified pilots and aviation mechanics, and licensed mariners—that focus upon the underlying medical conditions that would require use of prescription medications. Evaluating medical professionals are trained to seek information that would shed light on an individual’s use of medicines and their qualification to perform safety sensitive duties. It is also important to note that employers can expand upon the Department’s regulatory requirements, as long as they do not represent the test as being required by DOT. Under their non-DOT testing programs, DOT- regulated companies may test for other drugs of their choosing. Therefore, companies are not prohibited by DOT from testing for additional drugs that may be of concern within their communities and companies. Lowering Laboratory Cutoff Criteria for Cocaine and Amphetamines The Department proposed, in the NRPM, to adopt the HHS-lowered laboratory testing cutoffs for cocaine and amphetamines. Initial test cutoffs for cocaine metabolites would go from 300 to 150 ng/mL, while confirmation test cutoffs would go from 150 to 100 ng/mL. For amphetamines, initial test cutoffs would go from 1000 to 500 ng/mL, while confirmation tests for amphetamines and methamphetamines would go from 500 to 250 ng/mL. Comments Most commenters support the Department’s conforming to the HHS Mandatory Guidelines in lowering the cutoffs for both cocaine and amphetamines. Most believe doing so will enhance the safety of the traveling public because more users of illicit drugs and more users of non-prescribed medications will be identified. There was no controversy about the new screening and confirmation test levels for cocaine. Some commenters believed that there could be ‘‘false positive’’ drug tests stemming from the new cutoffs for amphetamines. Some others believed the amphetamine cutoffs could even cause laboratories to report over-the- counter (OTC) medications as confirmed positive test results. Some others believed that lowering the screening cutoffs for amphetamines will provide little value in the confirmation process, serving only to increase the cost of the program. Some commenters cited the data from one of the laboratories—Clinical Research Laboratory (CRL)—as reason to support the new cutoffs, while others cited the same data as reason to oppose the new cutoffs. DOT Response As stated earlier in this document, the Department must follow the laboratory testing protocols and standards that are established by HHS. Therefore, we must and will adhere to the screening and confirmation drug testing cutoffs that HHS has established for the laboratories and for which the laboratories are certified. In addition, taken with the comment data from Quest Laboratories, we believe the laboratory data sets from both Quest and CRL lead likely to some, but not all, of the same conclusions. Regarding cocaine, based upon data provided by both Quest and CRL, we can expect a marked increase in cocaine users identified using the new screening and confirmation cutoffs that HHS has established. The Department, like the overwhelming number of commenters, considers this to be a beneficial change. In 2009, there were nearly 13,000 positive DOT drug test results reported by laboratories as having confirmed positives for cocaine. Quest and CRL data show that we can expect a significant number of confirmed positive test results for cocaine using the new cutoffs. These new lower cutoffs should result in the Department identifying more cocaine users, further assuring the traveling public that the transportation system is the safest it can be. Doing so will also permit us to continue to further deter drug use in the transportation industries and get those identified as using drugs referred for evaluation and treatment. Regarding amphetamine and methamphetamine, the Quest data report on 68,000 regulated and 132,000 non-regulated specimens and indicate that a 40% increase in screening and a 30% increase in confirmation rates are expected; hence, a large number of currently non-detected users would be identified. A second submission of amphetamine and methamphetamine test data, this from CRL, includes the reanalysis of a much smaller number of regulated specimens. Several important facts about the CRL study protocols and results were not fully explained or clarified in their data submission. As a result, we are concerned that other commenters may have misinterpreted the CRL data as meaning that there will be ‘‘false positive’’ tests results for amphetamines and that some OTC medications—ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine—will be confirmed and reported as positives by laboratories. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 5 of 15 Item # 25 49855 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations We want to address these commenters’ statements that testing at the new amphetamine screening cutoffs will yield ‘‘false positive’’ test results. Neither CRL nor Quest even alluded to there being a ‘‘false positive’’ testing issue with the new amphetamine cutoffs. Concerns about the risks of ‘‘false positive’’ test results are not supported by the available data. In fact, no reportable positive test results were identified in the CRL and Quest data on specimens that did not, in fact, screen and confirm positive for a drug for which DOT tests. In addition, we want to clarify that no OTC medication that CRL chose to test for—ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine—would confirm positive on a DOT test and would be reported on a DOT test. We are concerned that the CRL confirmation testing on these specimens may have proven misleading to the groups who read the data and believed that our tests for amphetamines would identify these particular OTC medications. It is our opinion that CRL’s inclusion of this confirmation test data does not support CRL’s conclusion. Laboratories simply will not conduct confirmation testing for or identify these OTC medications in DOT’s program. It is also important to note that only confirmed positive drug tests are reported to the MRO as positive. No results screened positive are reported as positive until and unless they are also positive on a laboratory confirmation test and for the drugs for which we test. And, no test result is reported to the employer until the MRO properly verifies the result by determining if the employee has a legitimate medical explanation for the positive. If the employee has a legitimate medical explanation, the MRO will report the result to the employer as a negative test. These are ‘‘due process’’ steps that have always been an integral part of DOT’s testing program. We realize that laboratories will certainly screen specimens for amphetamines at the new HHS cutoffs and will not realize the same return rate on confirmed positive testing as they observe now, as CRL points out effectively in their data. CRL is concerned that the cost of confirming the increased number of screened positive tests does not warrant the expense for such a small number of confirmed positives, as shown by their data. It is important to note that the confirmation rates for opiates and amphetamines is now generally less than that for THC, cocaine, and PCP. Therefore, it is not unusual to see a disparity between screening rates and subsequent confirmation rates, especially for opiates and amphetamines. However, we will urge HHS to closely monitor this screening issue for amphetamines during the first year the new cutoffs are in place. We believe that the issue will be properly evaluated by HHS with DOT, the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Drug Testing Advisory Board (CSAP DTAB), and laboratories in determining if the screening cutoffs for amphetamine would need to be modified upward if the added cost largely outweighed the benefits. The CSAP DTAB provides advice to the Administrator, SAMHSA, regarding the drug testing laboratory certification program. Laboratory Testing for 6– Acetylmorphine (6–AM) In the NPRM, we proposed to incorporate new HHS criteria for initial testing for 6–AM, a marker for heroin. We also asked if there were factual, evidence-based concerns about the need to show morphine with a 6–AM confirmed positive result. Also, if there were evidence-based systematic research and studies showing that morphine must also be present and quantitations reported, we asked for solutions by laboratories and/or MROs to adequately address the issue. Comments A slight majority of commenters expressed support for the new HHS screening and confirmation cutoffs for 6–AM. Some who support the tests for 6–AM do so because they believe transportation safety will be enhanced when more heroin users are identified and removed from their safety-sensitive duties. Several who do not support the provision express concern about the new cutoffs no longer requiring a test for morphine—something they say is imperative to ensure that the person is actually a heroin user. At least one commenter believes no additional heroin users will be identified and expresses concern about the cost of having only one supplier of laboratory reagent for 6–AM. Several laboratory entities and experts weighed in on the issue. RTI International (RTI) agreed with HHS for screening all specimens for 6–AM and for dropping the requirement to ensure a presence of morphine above 2000 ng/ mL. RTI indicated that the new testing will increase the positive rate by 8— 29%, but failed to explain the basis for its concern. They also quote three studies as supporting the HHS decision. Clinical Research Laboratory (CRL) quoted their own study—for which we have no way to assess the adequacy of the study protocols—and stated that out of 820 tests for opiates and 6–AM, all screened at 3 ng/mL, versus the HHS cutoff of 10 ng/mL, and all except one had opiate positive results above the 2,000ng/mL cutoff. CRL did not attempt to explain why this sample tested positive for 6–AM but did not test for morphine. They concluded that there is no published explanation for the detection of 6–AM without the presence of morphine. Therefore, CRL recommended that the Department provide guidance to MROs and laboratories about conferring with one another if there were ever 6–AM without the presence of morphine. Quest Laboratories reviewed 1.2 million test results. Of those specimen results, 112 tested positive for 6–AM (heroin). The Quest study data indicated that 7 of those 112 6–AM positives also tested positive for morphine in the 300– 2000 ng/mL range. The remaining 105 6–AM positives had morphine confirmed above 2000 ng/mL. Quest suggested that ‘‘only’’ six tests out of a million would test positive for 6–AM and not have morphine that was present reported to the MRO. Therefore, Quest recommended that DOT provide additional guidance to MROs to speak with laboratories related to morphine that may be present but not reported by the laboratory. DOT Response As stated earlier in this document, the Department must follow the laboratory testing protocols and standards that are established by HHS. Therefore, we must adhere to the screening and confirmation drug testing cutoffs that HHS has established for the laboratories and for which the laboratories are certified. 6–AM is a unique metabolite produced when a person uses the illicit drug heroin. 6–AM is both excreted in the urine and further metabolized to morphine. Morphine can also be excreted in the urine as a result of codeine or morphine use. Thus, morphine is a common metabolite of both heroin and codeine. It is well established that, in some instances, individuals who are positive for 6–AM are atypically low in the coincident morphine concentration found in urine. That is, their morphine concentrations are below the HHS/DOT cutoff of 2000 ng/mL and even below 300 ng/mL. Therefore, testing programs focused on the morphine concentration as the screening discriminator will fail to identify a number of heroin users VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 6 of 15 Item # 25 49856 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations (estimated by some studies referenced in the docket to be about 10% of the opiate positives). While morphine positives in the absence of 6–AM require significant MRO intervention to differentiate legitimate morphine or codeine sources for morphine, 6–AM is a definitive marker for heroin use and thus requires no MRO intervention. There are simply no legitimate medical explanations for 6–AM positive tests. Although there has been from time to time some anecdotal suggestion that 6–AM can be produced from morphine, existing scientific evidence does not support such a claim. The atypical finding of a 6–AM positive in the absence of significant morphine findings by CRL may be the result of recent heroin use close to the time of sampling, a metabolic defect in the metabolism of 6–AM resulting in prolonged excretion, shunting of metabolic pathways away from morphine, or interaction with other substances not identified. Therefore, the 6–AM testing does not require confirmation by the simultaneous detection of a specified quantity of morphine. Multiple scientific publications have concluded that a portion of the population shows urinary concentrations of 6–AM above 10 ng/mL with morphine concentrations below 300 ng/mL, even though the Quest study showed that none of their 6–AM positive results had morphine below a 300 ng/mL cutoff. Therefore, the salient facts are: •6–AM confirmed positive tests do not need a morphine marker; •Data show that when one looks for morphine as a marker, it most always exists above the morphine confirmation cutoffs or above Limit of Detection (LOD); and •If the morphine marker does not exist on a 6–AM positive result, there is ample scientific reason to strongly suggest recent heroin use. Despite these facts and until more information is gathered from DOT’s experience with 6–AM testing, when a 6–AM confirmed positive result is reported and morphine for that specimen is not reported at or above the 2000 ng/mL confirmed positive cutoff, the laboratory and MRO must confer to determine if there was confirmed morphine below the 2000 ng/mL, and if not, whether further testing is needed to quantify the amount of morphine present. The laboratory must report the amount of morphine from the test to the MRO. If a laboratory finds no detectable morphine at its LOD upon further testing, the laboratory must report that fact to DOT’s Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance (ODAPC) immediately. Based upon the scientific evidence that exists today, we simply do not think that 6–AM with no morphine detected will occur. But we will determine what our first year of 6–AM screening and confirmation testing reveals in this matter. We would work directly with MROs on these cases, if there would be any. We would also work with HHS to determine if additional action is necessary. Ultimately, the MRO, with ODAPC’s assistance, would make a verified result determination following these discussions. Last year, HHS-certified laboratories conducted approximately 5.2 million DOT tests. Quest estimates that there will be 6 tests per one million that would be reported to MROs for 6–AM with morphine concentrations below the established confirmation cutoffs. Extrapolated, this would mean approximately 30 6–AM positive specimen tests a year will be reported to MROs with morphine below 2000 ng/ mL. As with other 6–AM positives, the MRO must not accept an assertion that there is a legitimate explanation for the presence of 6–AM in the employee’s specimen. Approval of Medical Review Officer Training and Examination Groups The HHS Mandatory Guidelines will require that nationally-recognized MRO certification entities or subspecialty boards for medical practitioners in the field of medical review must have their qualifications, training programs, and examinations approved by HHS on an annual basis. The Department requested comments on whether part 40 should require these groups to be approved and if the Department should seek a shared approval process with HHS. Comments Commenters were rather evenly divided about whether the Department should require or join the approval process of the nationally-recognized MRO certification and subspecialty boards. Some who support DOT’s involvement expressed concern that HHS would be the only approving authority if the Department does not share in that responsibility. Some who did not support the Department’s involvement in the approval process also tended not to support HHS approval of these boards, either. Some commenters offered suggestions about basic standards for national certification groups. DOT Response While we believe the current MRO training and examination boards have very strong standards, we want to be certain that these groups continue to present well and accurately the Department’s part 40 and DOT agency, including the USCG, drug rules. After all, no MRO wants to be in violation of the Department’s regulations because of erroneous information presented during training or on a certification examination. Consequently, it makes sense to consider the benefits of additional oversight of MRO certification groups. Some of the basic standards suggested by one commenter were very similar to our Subpart O requirements for national drug and alcohol counselor certification organizations. Our experience with these counselor certification organizations taught us that having standard requirements rules out up- front substandard counseling organizations. Our SAP experience also taught us that, from the beginning, the major MRO organizations had established highly reputable training and examination modalities. In fact, we used some of the MRO testing standards in laying out the examination requirements that SAP testing organizations now follow. We liked the idea submitted by one of the commenters for basic standards for the MRO certification organizations and will pass these ideas to HHS. However, we see no pressing need for the Department to use our limited staff time and personnel to participate in or require approval for these established organizations. Again, our experience has been that these national organizations effectively train, test, and certify MROs. As long as they continue to do so, and as long as there are no new MRO certification organizations on the horizon, we see no reason to expend additional resources approving those who have already demonstrated their competence. We will continue our practice of helping MRO training and examination groups to accurately update DOT’s portions of their course materials, manuals, and examination content. We believe our assistance will enable us to make sure that content is DOT-specific and accurate. We anticipate that HHS approval standards would include all Federal testing programs. However, we do not intend to become involved in this approval process, unless HHS identifies significant deficits with any of the training and examination efforts by any of these boards that affect DOT’s VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 7 of 15 Item # 25 49857 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations 1‘‘Proctored Versus Unproctored Online Exams: Studying the Impact of Exam Environment on Student Performance,’’ Kimberly K. Hollister and Mark L. Berenson Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education Volume 7 Issue 1, Pages 271– 294 Published Online: 16 Jan 2009  2010 Decision Sciences Institute. ‘‘On-line instruction: Are the outcomes the same?’’ Warren, L., & Holloman, Jr., H. (2005). Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 148–151. ‘‘Questioning the hybrid model: Student outcomes in different course formats’’ Reasons, S., Valadares, K., & Slavkin, M., Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, (2005) 9(1). ‘‘Comparison of outcomes on like exams administered to in-residence and asynchronous distance-based Pharm. D. students.’’ Ragan, R. & Kleoppel, J. (2004). Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4). ‘‘The Relationship Between Performance Levels and Test Delivery Methods,’’ Patricia Royal, Paul Bell; International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, July 2008 Vol. 5. No. 7. ‘‘Traditional versus Online Content Delivery and Assessment,’’ Margaret D. Anderson and Mark Connell, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, February 2009, Vol. 6. No. 2. program. For now, DOT will not require these MRO training and examination organizations to obtain HHS approval. Furthermore, MROs in the DOT program will not be required to be trained by an HHS-approved group, as long as the MROs meet DOT’s qualification training and requalification training requirements. Some of the commenters noted that one MRO certification organization reportedly provides an on-line examination. These commenters ask the Department to put a stop to this practice by requiring only proctored testing. One commenter indicated that at least the examination for the initial MRO certification should be proctored. We will defer action on the issue of proctored versus on-line examinations until we know more about the HHS approval process. We would note, however, that the entire issue of proctored versus on-line examinations remains largely unresolved—with supporters in both corners and with studies and literature supporting both camps.1 Medical Review Officer Recurrent Requalification Training and Examination In our NPRM we sought comments on whether part 40, at 49 CFR 40.121(d), should be amended by removing the requirement that MROs must complete 12 Continuing Education Units (CEUs) pertaining to DOT and MRO practices every three years, and instead require MROs to be requalified every five years by an MRO certification board or subspecialty board for medical practitioners. Comments Most commenters supported the idea that the Department require MROs to be requalified by being certified on a regular basis. Most also wanted DOT to continue to require MROs to have continuing education (or, Continuing Medical Education) related to their MRO work. Several commenters indicated that they did not see any benefit to changing the requirements, believing that initial qualification training and the continuing education requirement the Department established in 2000 has proven adequate. DOT Response Medical review of drug test results is more complex today than when we established the continuing education requirement in 2000. Therefore, we have decided to side with the overwhelming majority of commenters supporting MRO requalification training and reexamination on a regular basis. We will require MRO requalification every five years. However, to offset the associated costs, we will not maintain the requirement for continuing education. Over the years, it has been somewhat difficult for us to know whether the 12 CEU hours obtained by many MROs every three years were indeed related to DOT’s testing program, as required. However, based on our experience to date, we believe that a requalification requirement every five years will assure DOT agency auditors and inspectors and regulated employers that MROs are appropriately qualified. We anticipate that MROs will continue to obtain CEUs by virtue of their MD and DO licensure requirements. In addition, the MRO certification boards provide their members with MRO manuals and periodic newsletters in an effort to keep everyone up-to-date on the Department’s program requirements. The MRO plays a key role in our important Federal safety program and maintains the Constitutionally mandated balance between the safety and privacy objectives of the program. The MRO’s role in gathering and evaluating the medical evidence and providing due process is imperative. These are duties that must be carried out by the MRO and cannot be delegated to anyone. The MRO is charged with certain important medical and administrative duties. The MRO must have detailed knowledge of the effects of medications and other potential alternative medical explanations for laboratory reported drug test results. He or she is responsible for determining whether legitimate medical explanations are available to explain an employee’s drug test result. This medical review process has become far more complex as a result of specimen validity testing and the myriad of medical explanations for adulterated, substituted, and invalid laboratory test results. These complexities have made MRO knowledge of the effects of drugs and medications even more important than it was in 2000. Part 40 also requires the MRO to confer with prescribing physicians in making decisions about prescription changes so that alternative medications can be used that will not impact public safety. Similarly, the MRO is required to report to employers the employees’ prescription and over-the-counter medication use (or dangerous combinations of use) that the MRO believes will negatively affect duty performance. In addition, the MRO is required to medically assess referral physician examinations and evaluations in certain positive and refusal-to-test situations. These, too, have become more complex over time. For these reasons, we think qualification training and examination followed by requalification and an examination every five years will be much more effective than the current one-time training and examination requirement with periodic CEUs. To ensure that MROs are well qualified, the requalification process must be very similar to the original qualification training (i.e., a full training program addressing all issues required by part 40) and an examination administered by a nationally recognized MRO certification board or subspecialty board for medical practitioners in the field of medical review of DOT-mandated drug tests. A mere ‘‘update’’ type of training will be considered a violation of part 40. This regulation text lays out the requirements for when this new requalification training is to take place. MROs must maintain documentation about their qualification training and any subsequent continuing education. MROs would simply be required to complete the new requalification training and examination no later than five years from the date of having last met either their qualification training or continuing education requirements. Following the completion of the new requalification requirements, MROs will be required to complete requalification training and examination every five years thereafter. DOT will continue to use the term ‘‘qualification training’’ rather than ‘‘certification training’’ and will use VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 8 of 15 Item # 25 49858 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations ‘‘requalification training’’ rather than ‘‘recertification training’’ in part 40. Medical Review Officer Records Maintenance In the NPRM we asked for discussion related to MRO records; primarily we asked what documentation of consultation and deliberation should be in MRO records. In the NPRM, we stated that our current recordkeeping requirements for negative and non- negative test results would not change based upon the new HHS MRO recordkeeping requirements. Comments Six commenters addressed the issue of MRO records. All supported the idea that MROs should keep records and that the time frame should be the same as that required for employers. One association said that DOT inspectors are not qualified to question MRO judgments regarding medical information and its relevance. Another commenter indicated that personal information, which was not defined, should be confidential and not part of the MRO file. This same commenter provided a long list of items that should be part of the record, including various dates and times of MRO contacts and conversations with various Designated Employer Representatives (DERs), collectors, and employers. In addition, this commenter believed that information should be included related to contacts with other physicians, laboratories, and pharmacies, although without specific detail. DOT Response The DOT agrees with commenters that MRO records are very important and integral to the MRO review process. We believe that records and notes generated by the review process need to be maintained. The purpose of any record is to ensure that proper procedures and results were achieved under part 40 requirements. MRO records must show why a particular specimen is negative or non-negative. At times, the test result must withstand legal challenges. DOT regulations already require MROs to follow the employer’s record retention requirements—five years for non-negatives and one year for negatives. Those will not change. The notes recorded by the MRO are considered by the Department to be part of the record. These notes generally contain all the information that was discussed by the MRO with the employee and any supplemental information the MRO uses to support the various reasons the employee provides as legitimate medical explanation for a non-negative result. The MRO records may include copies of prescriptions, letters from other physicians, and consultations by the MRO with physicians, pharmacy personnel, laboratory personnel, and other appropriate individuals. However, a listing of these contacts without specific references as to what was discussed would not be effective. There must be a specific comment or rationale to which the MRO can subsequently refer for support and reasoning about the outcome of the verification process. This is especially true if a decision is challenged in a court or an administrative hearing proceeding. During the verification interview, the employee may share personal information. Unless a specific issue, such as the use of psychotropic medication, is used as a medical explanation for a drug positive, the MRO should not include the other sensitive, unrelated personal information in the record. From a practical point of view, MROs will primarily record information that is specific to the issue at hand or may have an impact upon safety. The Department is comfortable that MROs are trained, both in their role as physicians and as MROs, to maintain a clear balance between recording of pertinent information versus not recording sensitive information which is not relevant to the verification process or transportation safety. In reference to inspectors’ qualifications to question MROs medical decisions, we want to point out that the purpose of an inspection is not to challenge a physician’s medical expertise, but rather to ensure that the MRO is abiding by regulations and current requirements. In most cases, the issue would be whether there is adequate documentation for whatever action the MRO took. For example, if the MRO had his or her staff confer with the pharmacist or a prescribing physician—instead of doing so himself or herself, as the regulations require— the MRO’s procedures would be contrary to part 40. When a positive result is downgraded to a negative result, the inspector would look at the reason for this downgrade. If there is a legitimate medical explanation, the inspector would expect to see this clearly spelled out in the record. For example, if a THC positive confirmed laboratory result were downgraded to negative because of an explanation of ‘‘medical marijuana’’ use, the inspector would rightfully view that as a serious matter, because it remains unacceptable for any safety-sensitive employee subject to DOT drug testing rules to use marijuana. Additional areas of concern by DOT inspectors and auditors focus upon the person(s) who actually talk(s) with the employee following a non-negative result (e.g., the MRO vs. the MRO staff), how requests for split specimen testing are handled and whether requests are handled in timely manner, and how DERs are notified about non-negative results. The Department also knows that inspectors and auditors are trained to address all of these issues, and they are sensitive to the fact that these MRO records contain medical information and that they must be handled appropriately. We want to reaffirm that inspecting and auditing MRO records has been, and will continue to be, one of the mechanisms that inspectors and auditors use to ensure compliance with DOT regulations. Section-by-Section Discussion The following part of the preamble discusses each of the final rule’s sections, including responses to comments on each section. Table of Contents The Department proposed, in the NPRM, to modify some existing section headings in order to reflect regulation text changes. In all, three section headings have been modified and one has been added. §40.3, §40.87, and §40.139 have been revised, and §40.140 has been added. Section 40.3 What do the terms in this part mean? In order to align more closely the definitions in §40.3 with definitions contained in the HHS Mandatory Guidelines, in the NPRM, the Department proposed modifying some existing definitions and adding several new ones. Five commenters supported this proposal and responded by making suggested additions or changes to this section. Several commenters did not support the changes, contending that the Department should not allow DOT- regulated employers to use IITFs. Because the Department is not allowing IITFs, no definitions related to IITFs will be added. A few commenters did not want the Department to change its definition of ‘‘cancelled test’’ because the proposed definition was confusing. After reviewing the comments the Department agrees with the commenters and will keep the current definition of ‘‘cancelled test.’’ Other commenters did not want the Department to add definitions that were only applied to the HHS program and not to the DOT VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 9 of 15 Item # 25 49859 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations program. We have reviewed those definitions and decided that most will be in the regulation. It is necessary to harmonize our terms with HHS definitions, in order that laboratories and others in the drug testing industry have consistent terms with which to operate. In all, 13 definitions will be modified or added to harmonize with HHS definitions, and one will be removed. The new or modified definitions are ‘‘Adulterated specimen,’’ ‘‘Confirmatory drug test,’’ ‘‘Initial drug test (also known as a Screening drug test),’’ ‘‘Initial specimen validity test,’’ ‘‘Invalid drug test,’’ ‘‘Laboratory,’’ ‘‘Limit of Detection (LOD),’’ ‘‘Limit of Quantitation,’’ ‘‘Negative result,’’ ‘‘Positive result,’’ ‘‘Reconfirmed,’’ ‘‘Rejected for testing,’’ and ‘‘Split specimen collection.’’ The term ‘‘Initial validity test’’ was removed. Section 40.87 What are the cutoff concentrations for drug tests? The Department will require conducting initial and confirmation testing for MDMA, MDA, and MDEA, conducting initial testing for 6–AM, lowering the initial and confirmation cutoff concentrations for amphetamines, and lowering the initial and confirmation cutoff concentrations for cocaine. We include certain instructions for laboratories (and MROs) related to 6–AM testing. Specific discussions of these issues are included under ‘‘Principal Policy Issues’’ in this preamble. Section 40.97 What do laboratories report and how do they report it? The Department added a paragraph to this section instructing the laboratory to contact ODAPC if it ever confirms 6– AM with no detectable morphine at its LOD, upon further testing. A fuller discussion of this matter is in ‘‘Principal Policy Issues.’’ Section 40.121 Who is qualified to act as an MRO? Commenters had a number of suggestions related to ongoing training for MROs. The DOT reviewed the comments and, as discussed in the ‘‘Principal Policy Issues,’’ will require MRO requalification, including training and examination, every five years. Section 40.139 On what basis does the MRO verify test results for codeine and morphine? The Department has revised this section by limiting the section to how MROs are to verify laboratory-confirmed codeine and morphine test results. We removed 6–AM verification from this section and moved it to a new section. We also revised the section’s heading. Section 40.140 On what basis does the MRO verify test results for 6- acetylmorphine (6–AM)? This new section provides instructions to MROs on how they are to verify confirmed positive 6–AM results from laboratories. Instructions include how MROs are to handle 6–AM confirmed positive results when morphine is above the confirmation cutoff, when morphine is confirmed below the confirmation cutoff, when morphine is confirmed above LOD, and if ever morphine is not detected at LOD upon further testing. A fuller discussion of this matter is in ‘‘Principal Policy Issues.’’ Section 40.151 What are MROs prohibited from doing as part of the verification process? The Department has revised this section by adding MDMA, MDA, and MDEA as being among the drugs for the presence of which there exist no legitimate medical explanations. This instruction is consistent with what the Department has said about PCP and 6– AM. Section 40.159 What does the MRO do when a drug test is invalid? In response to the commenters’ concerns related to pH, this section is based on a July 2008 guidance authorizing MROs to consider time and temperature in making their verification decisions if pH is in the 9.0–9.5 range. A fuller discussion of this matter is in ‘‘Principal Policy Issues.’’ Section 40.163 How does the MRO report drug test results? The majority of the commenters wanted DOT to be clear about the records MROs should keep and how long MROs should keep them. Based upon the comments, we have decided to put more specificity about this issue into the MRO rule text section. MROs keep negative and cancelled drug test reports and records for one year, and all positive and refusal drug test reports and records for five years. A fuller discussion of this matter is in ‘‘Principal Policy Issues.’’ Appendix B to Part 40—DOT Drug Testing Semi-Annual Laboratory Report to Employers The Department has modified the requirements for the semi-annual laboratory reports to employers. The changes require laboratories to also report the total number of MDMA, MDA, and MDEA positive drug test results. Appendix C to Part 40—DOT Drug Testing Semi-Annual Laboratory Report to DOT The Department has modified the requirements for the semi-annual laboratory reports to DOT. The changes require laboratories to also delineate the positives for the newly added MDMA, MDA, and MDEA. We are also breaking out the other drugs for which we test in order to make it simpler for laboratories to report and for our staff to tally the reports. Other Issues There were several comments that addressed editorial changes and included typographical errors. We appreciate these comments and incorporated a good many of the suggestions and edits. The Department also received several comments that we consider to be outside of the scope for this rulemaking. However, in order to try to bring closure to these issues, we will provide some explanation and clarification. One commenter said that section 40.25 stated that the employer was required to obtain consent from the applicant, but the commenter believed that section 40.27 prohibited the employer from obtaining consent for release of the 40.25 information. We would like to point out that section 40.25 requires the employee to sign this written consent in order to perform safety-sensitive duties and is very specific as to the purpose of this consent. Section 40.27 prohibits an employer from requiring the employee to sign a form consenting to participation in the program, a blanket release form for all drug and alcohol testing information, or any type of waiver of indemnification or liability. There is no contradiction between these two requirements. Another commenter believed that the HHS employer option for a second collection, if the first test result was ‘‘negative dilute,’’ was not adopted by DOT. We would point out that this authorization has already been part of our rule for some time and is clearly spelled out in section 40.197. One commenter wanted the Department to establish a time limit on how long an employee had to wait at a collection site before providing a urine specimen. This commenter thought that two hours should be the maximum timeframe an employee had to wait to provide a specimen. This same commenter also wanted clarification about what constituted a ‘‘drug failure’’ VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 10 of 15 Item # 25 49860 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations and that leaving the collection site for a short time should not be considered a refusal, unless the employee left the collection area where the urine sample is actually taken. Additionally, this commenter wanted some grievance procedures to be established should there be problems at a collection site. Although this commenter was concerned about how long an employee may have to wait to provide a specimen, we would like to emphasize that section 40.61(b) clearly directs the collection site to ‘‘begin the testing process without undue delay.’’ The Department’s position has always been that testing should start as soon as possible after the employee’s arrival at the site. The Department’s position has always been that the employee cannot leave the collection site, i.e., the waiting area, even for a short time. Leaving the site provides employees the opportunity to adulterate or substitute their specimens. And finally, collection site problems encountered by employees should be raised to the employer following the collection. The employer is ultimately responsible for the proper operation of its drug testing program. One association asked for clarification as to what the Department intended by the term ‘‘same business day’’ as it applies under section 40.205. This section directs that if a problem is identified in the testing process, anyone involved in it should make an attempt to correct the problem on the same business day that notification is received about the problem. This commenter provided several scenarios where the employer, the collection site, or the service agent offices are closed, but the information is transmitted to them. The question is how these entities can meet the requirement of responding on the same day that they are notified about a problem. If an office is closed when information is received, common sense dictates that the next day the office is open is the business day it is received. Several commenters asked about other HHS Mandatory Guidelines procedures and whether the Department would adopt them. As discussed in the NPRM, the Department identified those HHS Mandatory Guidelines we proposed to adopt and which ones we did not. In this final rule, we have again highlighted those we have adopted. For example, the Department will not require observers to receive advanced, formalized training to learn about the steps necessary to directly observe a collection. The current process of having a qualified and trained collector provide immediate, precise, and relevant instructions to an observer at the time of a directly observed collection is very appropriate and effective and has been for years. That way, the Department can be assured that the requisite instructions are provided each time that direct observation is required, no matter how many, or few, an observer has already accomplished. In addition, the costs associated with formally training observers (and the resulting limitation on available observers) does not outweigh any minimal benefits to arguably be obtained by training observers in advance instead of providing timely and relevant instructions on site at the time direct observation is required. The Department is not aware of any cases where it was not effective to have the qualified and trained collector instruct the observer at the time a direct observation must occur, and to do so each and every time, no matter whether the observer has already been trained and properly informed. Also, DOT will not change our longstanding regulatory position that a collector need not obtain prior approval from a collection site supervisor before performing a directly observed collection. Requiring collectors to get approval from collection site supervisors would create difficult logistical issues that would complicate the process. There are numerous instances where the collector is alone or does not have immediate access to a collection site supervisor. In fact, the collector may be the site supervisor. Many collections occur off-site or in the middle of the night, where and when supervisors would not be available, and requiring consultation with an unavailable supervisor would prove onerous and serve only to delay the process unnecessarily. We believe qualified collectors should continue to make these direct observation collection decisions and to continue basing those decisions upon the clear requirements set forth in part 40. Also, we will not change the duration of the paperwork retention requirement for collectors. HHS will require collectors to keep Copy 3 for two years. The Department believes the current 30 days is sufficient in DOT’s program. Retention for 30 days has proven a sufficient amount of time in which to ensure that a CCF copy with the employee’s signature would be available to the MRO when the MRO’s CCF copy was not available. Requiring document retention for two years would greatly increase the paperwork burden without any added safety or efficiency benefit. Under the revised HHS Mandatory Guidelines, Federal agencies will be required to audit five percent or a maximum of 50 of their collection sites annually. The Department believes that creating a parallel requirement for transportation industry employers would be very expensive to employers in DOT’s program in terms of time and resources, with few efficiency and/or safety benefits. The Department would anticipate seeing more effective monitoring by the collection site parent organizations in an effort to ensure for employers that sites under their organization umbrellas, with which employers are contracting, are properly conducting collections. The DOT agencies and the U.S. Coast Guard also provide on-site audits and inspections of collection sites. They have also increased their mock collection inspections and their clandestine inspections. All of these provide added oversight to determine whether collection site personnel are properly performing collections and whether collection sites adhere to DOT’s strong security and integrity requirements. The revised HHS Mandatory Guidelines will require at least three percent blind specimen testing, compared to DOT’s current one percent. We believe our current requirements represent a good balance between considerations of reducing burdens and maintaining an effective check upon laboratory performance. We have had few, if any, laboratory accuracy problems over the history of the program, and we believe that we can continue to ensure that this pattern continues while reducing burdens and costs on participants. Coupled with the HHS requirements and the additional proficiency testing required for laboratory certification, the blinds submitted to laboratories for quality control testing purposes via DOT requirements are quite ample. In the NPRM, the Department estimated the total annual cost of testing for MDMA and 6–AM to be $1,361,063. One commenter believed that estimate to be too low, but did not offer any recommended cost figure. We believe there will be approximately 5 million DOT tests per year, and an MDMA test will cost on average $ 0.09 per test, and 6–AM will cost on average $.26 per test. MDMA will cost approximately $450 thousand per year, and 6–AM will cost approximately $1.3 million per year, for a total of $1.75 million per year. Regulatory Analyses and Notices The statutory authority for this rule derives from the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 (49 U.S.C. 102, 301, 322, 5331, 20140, 31306, and 45101 et seq.) and the VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 11 of 15 Item # 25 49861 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 322). The Department estimates there will be approximately 5 million DOT tests per year. An MDMA test will cost on average $0.09 per test, and 6–AM will cost on average $.26 per test. MDMA will cost approximately $450 thousand per year, and 6–AM will cost approximately $1.3 million per year, for a total of $1.75 million per year. Based upon the data discussed in the ‘‘Principal Policy Issues,’’ the increased detection of amphetamine, methamphetamine, and cocaine use through drug testing is estimated to be approximately 30% more for amphetamines/methamphetamines, and 30% more for cocaine. In 2009, HHS- certified laboratories reported to DOT that there were 14,195 confirmed DOT positive results for amphetamines/ methamphetamines. So, we estimate an increase of over 4,000 confirmed positive amphetamine/ methamphetamine test results. Also in 2009, laboratories reported 12,918 DOT cocaine confirmed positive results. Therefore, we estimate an increase of nearly 4,000 confirmed cocaine results. We estimate the cost associated with this increase of 8,000 positive test results for cocaine and amphetamines/ methamphetamines to be $500 thousand. The total program cost of the new regulation will be $2.25 million. It stands to reason that it will be cost beneficial to identify the illegal drug use of an additional 8,000 safety-sensitive transportation employees annually, across all modes—on roads, rails, water, or in the air, over land and underground. Furthermore, if identifying the illicit drug use by these employees prevents a single serious accident, then the economic benefits of the rule will outweigh its costs. As we have stated throughout this preamble, the Omnibus Act requires us to follow HHS on these specific drug testing matters. We have concluded that this rule is not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 or DOT’s regulatory policies and procedures. In addition to its low costs, it modifies our overall part 40 procedures and is intended to further align our laboratory procedures and processes, as well as some collection and MRO procedures, in order to harmonize DOT procedures with requirements that are being directed by HHS Mandatory Guidelines, which were themselves deemed to be non- significant rules. The DOT also certifies, under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Given the small net change in regulatory costs compared to the present rule, spread over the many thousands of small entities in the transportation industries, the cost impact per entity is expected to be negligible. There are no new information collection requirements that would be subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). This rule does not include requirements that (1) have substantial direct effects on the States, the relationship between the national government and the States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, (2) impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments, or (3) preempt State law. Therefore, the consultation and funding requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply. List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 40 Administrative practice and procedures, Alcohol abuse, Alcohol testing, Drug abuse, Drug testing, Laboratories, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety, Transportation. 49 CFR subtitle A, Authority and Issuance. Issued August 10, 2010, at Washington DC. Ray LaHood, Secretary of Transportation. ■For reasons discussed in the preamble, the Department of Transportation amends Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 40, as follows: PART 40—PROCEDURES FOR TRANSPORTATION WORKPLACE DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING PROGRAMS ■1. The authority citation for 49 CFR part 40 continues to read as follows: Authority: 40 U.S.C. 102, 301, 322, 5331, 20140, 31306, and 54101 et seq. * * * * * ■2. §40.3 is amended as follows: ■A. Revise the section heading. ■B. Revise the definitions of Adulterated specimen, Confirmatory drug test, Initial drug test (also known as a Screening drug test), Invalid drug test, Laboratory, and Limit of detection (LOD). ■C. Add in alphabetical order definitions of Initial specimen validity test, Limit of Quantitation, Negative result, Positive result, Reconfirmed, Rejected for testing, and Split specimen collection. ■D. Remove the definition of Initial validity test. The revisions and additions read as follows: §40.3 What do the terms used in this part mean? * * * * * Adulterated specimen. A specimen that has been altered, as evidenced by test results showing either a substance that is not a normal constituent for that type of specimen or showing an abnormal concentration of an endogenous substance. * * * * * Confirmatory drug test. A second analytical procedure performed on a different aliquot of the original specimen to identify and quantify the presence of a specific drug or drug metabolite. * * * * * Initial drug test (also known as a ‘‘Screening drug test’’). The test used to differentiate a negative specimen from one that requires further testing for drugs or drug metabolites. Initial specimen validity test. The first test used to determine if a urine specimen is adulterated, diluted, substituted, or invalid. Invalid drug test. The result reported by an HHS-certified laboratory in accordance with the criteria established by HHS Mandatory Guidelines when a positive, negative, adulterated, or substituted result cannot be established for a specific drug or specimen validity test. * * * * * Laboratory. Any U.S. laboratory certified by HHS under the National Laboratory Certification Program as meeting the minimum standards of Subpart C of the HHS Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs; or, in the case of foreign laboratories, a laboratory approved for participation by DOT under this part. * * * * * Limit of Detection (LOD). The lowest concentration at which a measurand can be identified, but (for quantitative assays) the concentration cannot be accurately calculated. Limit of Quantitation. For quantitative assays, the lowest concentration at which the identity and concentration of the measurand can be accurately established. * * * * * Negative result. The result reported by an HHS-certified laboratory to an MRO when a specimen contains no drug or the concentration of the drug is less than the cutoff concentration for the VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 12 of 15 Item # 25 49862 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations drug or drug class and the specimen is a valid specimen. * * * * * Positive result. The result reported by an HHS-certified laboratory when a specimen contains a drug or drug metabolite equal to or greater than the cutoff concentrations. * * * * * Reconfirmed. The result reported for a split specimen when the second laboratory is able to corroborate the original result reported for the primary specimen. * * * * * Rejected for testing. The result reported by an HHS-certified laboratory when no tests are performed for a specimen because of a fatal flaw or a correctable flaw that is not corrected. * * * * * Split specimen collection. A collection in which the urine collected is divided into two separate specimen bottles, the primary specimen (Bottle A) and the split specimen (Bottle B). * * * * * ■3. In §40. 87, the section heading and paragraph (a) are revised, and paragraph (e) is added, to read as follows: §40.87 What are the cutoff concentrations for drug tests? (a) As a laboratory, you must use the cutoff concentrations displayed in the following table for initial and confirmatory drug tests. All cutoff concentrations are expressed in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). The table follows: Initial test analyte Initial test cutoff concentration Confirmatory test analyte Confirmatory test cutoff con- centration Marijuana metabolites .................... 50 ng/mL ....................................... THCA 1 .......................................... 15 ng/mL. Cocaine metabolites ...................... 150 ng/mL ..................................... Benzoylecgonine .......................... 100 ng/mL. Opiate metabolites Codeine/Morphine2 ........................ 2000 ng/mL ................................... Codeine ........................................ 2000 ng/mL. Morphine ....................................... 2000 ng/mL. 6–Acetylmorphine .......................... 10 ng/mL ....................................... 6–Acetylmorphine ......................... 10 ng/mL. Phencyclidine ................................. 25 ng/mL ....................................... Phencyclidine ................................ 25 ng/mL. Amphetamines3 AMP/MAMP 4 .......................... 500 ng/mL ..................................... Amphetamine ................................ 250 ng/mL. Methamphetamine5 ...................... 250 ng/mL. MDMA 6 .......................................... 500 ng/mL ..................................... MDMA ........................................... 250 ng/mL. MDA7 ............................................ 250 ng/mL. MDEA8 .......................................... 250 ng/mL 1Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (THCA). 2Morphine is the target analyte for codeine/morphine testing. 3Either a single initial test kit or multiple initial test kits may be used provided the single test kit detects each target analyte independently at the specified cutoff. 4Methamphetamine is the target analyte for amphetamine/methamphetamine testing. 5To be reported positive for methamphetamine, a specimen must also contain amphetamine at a concentration equal to or greater than 100 ng/mL. 6Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). 7Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA). 8Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA). * * * * * (e) On a 6–AM confirmed positive result: (1) When a 6–AM confirmed positive result is reported and morphine for that specimen is not reported at or above the 2000 per ng/mL confirmed positive cutoff, you must confer with the MRO to determine if there was confirmed morphine below 2000 ng/mL. (2) If morphine was not confirmed below 2000 ng/mL, you and the MRO must determine whether further testing is needed to quantify the amount of morphine concentration present. (3) If you find no detectable morphine at LOD upon further testing, you must report that fact to ODAPC immediately. ■4. In §40.97, paragraph (g) is added to read as follows: §40.97 What do laboratories report and how do they report it? * * * * * (g) If you confirm 6–AM and find no detectable morphine at LOD upon further testing, you must report that fact to ODAPC immediately. ■5. In §40.121, paragraph (d) is revised to read as follows: §40.121 Who is qualified to act as an MRO? * * * * * (d) Requalification Training. During each five-year period from the date on which you satisfactorily completed the examination under paragraph (c)(2) of this section or have successfully completed the required continuing education requirements which were mandatory prior to October 1, 2010, you must complete requalification training. (1) This requalification training must meet the requirements of the qualification training under paragraph (c)(1) of this section. (2) Following your completion of requalification training, you must satisfactorily complete an examination administered by a nationally-recognized MRO certification board or subspecialty board for medical practitioners in the field of medical review of DOT- mandated drug tests. The examination must comprehensively cover all the elements of qualification training listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. * * * * * ■6. §40.139 is revised to read as follows: §40.139 On what basis does the MRO verify test results for codeine and morphine? As the MRO, you must proceed as follows when you receive a laboratory confirmed positive morphine or codeine test result: (a) In the absence of 6–AM, if the laboratory detects the presence of either morphine or codeine at 15,000 ng/mL or above, you must verify the test result positive unless the employee presents a legitimate medical explanation for the presence of the drug or drug metabolite in his or her system, as in the case of other drugs (see §40.137). Consumption of food products (e.g., poppy seeds) must not be considered a legitimate medical explanation for the employee having morphine or codeine at these concentrations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 13 of 15 Item # 25 49863 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations (b) For all other opiate positive results, you must verify a confirmed positive test result for opiates only if you determine that there is clinical evidence, in addition to the urine test, of unauthorized use of any opium, opiate, or opium derivative (i.e., morphine, heroin, or codeine). (1) As an MRO, it is your responsibility to use your best professional and ethical judgment and discretion to determine whether there is clinical evidence of unauthorized use of opiates. Examples of information that you may consider in making this judgment include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) Recent needle tracks; (ii) Behavioral and psychological signs of acute opiate intoxication or withdrawal; (iii) Clinical history of unauthorized use recent enough to have produced the laboratory test result; (iv) Use of a medication from a foreign country. See §40.137(e) for guidance on how to make this determination. (2) In order to establish the clinical evidence referenced in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section, personal observation of the employee is essential. (i) Therefore, you, as the MRO, must conduct, or cause another physician to conduct, a face-to-face examination of the employee. (ii) No face-to-face examination is needed in establishing the clinical evidence referenced in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) or (iv) of this section. (3) To be the basis of a verified positive result for opiates, the clinical evidence you find must concern a drug that the laboratory found in the specimen. (For example, if the test confirmed the presence of codeine, and the employee admits to unauthorized use of hydrocodone, you do not have grounds for verifying the test positive. The admission must be for the substance that was found). (4) As the MRO, you have the burden of establishing that there is clinical evidence of unauthorized use of opiates referenced in paragraph (b) of this section. If you cannot make this determination (e.g., there is not sufficient clinical evidence or history), you must verify the test as negative. The employee does not need to show you that a legitimate medical explanation exists if no clinical evidence is established. ■7. A new §40.140 is added to read as follows: §40.140 On what basis does the MRO verify test results for 6-acetylmorphine (6– AM)? As the MRO, you must proceed as follows when you receive a laboratory confirmed 6–AM test result: (a) If the laboratory confirms the presence of 6–AM in the specimen and there is also any level of quantitation of morphine, you must verify the test result positive. (b) When a laboratory 6–AM confirmed positive result is reported and morphine for that specimen is not reported at or above the 2000 per ng/mL confirmed positive cutoff, you must confer with the laboratory to determine if there was confirmed morphine below 2000 ng/mL. (1) If there was confirmed morphine below 2000 ng/mL, you must verify the test result positive. (2) If morphine was not confirmed below 2000 ng/mL, you and the laboratory must determine whether further testing is needed to quantify the amount of morphine present. (c) If a laboratory finds detectable morphine at its LOD upon further testing, you must verify the test result positive. (d) If a laboratory finds no detectable morphine at its LOD upon further testing, you and the laboratory must report that fact to the ODAPC immediately. Following your discussion with ODAPC, you will make a verified result determination. ■8. In §40.151, paragraph (g) is revised to read as follows: §40.151 What are MROs prohibited from doing as part of the verification process? * * * * * (g) You must not accept an assertion that there is a legitimate medical explanation for the presence of PCP, 6– AM, MDMA, MDA, or MDEA in a specimen. * * * * * ■9. In §40.159, paragraph (a)(6) is added to read as follows: §40.159 What does the MRO do when a drug test is invalid? (a) * * * (6) When the test result is invalid because pH is greater than or equal to 9.0 but less than or equal to 9.5 and the employee has no other medical explanation for the pH, you should consider whether there is evidence of elapsed time and increased temperature that could account for the pH value. (i) You are authorized to consider the temperature conditions that were likely to have existed between the time of collection and transportation of the specimen to the laboratory, and the length of time between the specimen collection and arrival at the laboratory. (ii) You may talk with the collection site and laboratory to discuss time and temperature issues, including any pertinent information regarding specimen storage. (iii) If you determine that time and temperature account for the pH value, you must cancel the test and take no further action, as provided at paragraph (a)(4) of this section. (iv) If you determine that time and temperature fail to account for the pH value, you must cancel the test and direct another collection under direct observation, as provided at paragraph (a)(5) of this section. * * * * * ■10. In §40.163, paragraph (h) is added to read as follows: §40.163 How does the MRO report drug test results? * * * * * (h) You must maintain reports and records related to negatives and cancelled results for one year; you must maintain reports and records related to positives and refusals for five years, unless otherwise specified by applicable DOT agency regulations. ■11. Appendix B to part 40 is revised to read as follows: Appendix B to Part 40—DOT Drug Testing Semi-Annual Laboratory Report to Employers The following items are required on each laboratory report: Reporting Period: (inclusive dates) Laboratory Identification: (name and address) Employer Identification: (name; may include Billing Code or ID code) C/TPA Identification: (where applicable; name and address) 1. Specimen Results Reported (total number) By Test Reason (a) Pre-employment (number) (b) Post-Accident (number) (c) Random (number) (d) Reasonable Suspicion/Cause (number) (e) Return-to-Duty (number) (f) Follow-up (number) (g) Type of Test Not Noted on CCF (number) 2. Specimens Reported (a) Negative (number) (b) Negative and Dilute (number) 3. Specimens Reported as Rejected for Testing (total number) By Reason (a) Fatal flaw (number) (b) Uncorrected Flaw (number) 4. Specimens Reported as Positive (total number) By Drug (a) Marijuana Metabolite (number) (b) Cocaine Metabolite (number) (c) Opiates (number) (1) Codeine (number) (2) Morphine (number) VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 14 of 15 Item # 25 49864 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 157/Monday, August 16, 2010/Rules and Regulations (3) 6–AM (number) (d) Phencyclidine (number) (e) Amphetamines (number) (1) Amphetamine (number) (2) Methamphetamine (number) (3) MDMA (number) (4) MDA (number) (5) MDEA (number) 5. Adulterated (number) 6. Substituted (number) 7. Invalid Result (number) ■12. Appendix C to part 40 is revised to read as follows: Appendix C to Part 40—DOT Drug Testing Semi-Annual Laboratory Report to DOT Mail, fax, or e-mail to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance, W62–300, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Fax: (202) 366–3897. E-mail: ODAPCWebMail@dot.gov. The following items are required on each report: Reporting Period: (inclusive dates) Laboratory Identification: (name and address) 1. DOT Specimen Results Reported (total number) 2. Negative Results Reported (total number) Negative (number) Negative-Dilute (number) 3. Rejected for Testing Results Reported (total number) By Reason (a) Fatal flaw (number) (b) Uncorrected Flaw (number) 4. Positive Results Reported (total number) By Drug (a) Marijuana Metabolite (number) (b) Cocaine Metabolite (number) (c) Opiates (number) (1) Codeine (number) (2) Morphine (number) (3) 6–AM (number) (d) Phencyclidine (number) (e) Amphetamines (number) (1) Amphetamine (number) (2) Methamphetamine (number) (3) MDMA (number) (4) MDA (number) (5) MDEA (number) 5. Adulterated Results Reported (total number) By Reason (number) 6. Substituted Results Reported (total number) 7. Invalid Results Reported (total number) By Reason (number) [FR Doc. 2010–20095 Filed 8–13–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:09 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\16AUR1.SGM 16AUR1WR e i e r - A v i l e s o n D S K G B L S 3 C 1 P R O D w i t h R U L E S Attachment number 3 Page 15 of 15 Item # 25 Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Effective Date: January 16, 1996 Revised Date: September 7, 2010 Revised/Approved Date: AUGUSTA POLICY AND PROCEDURES ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE 1 POLICY AND PURPOSE: 1.1 In recognition of the continued and growing problem of substance abuse, it is the policy of the Augusta to take all reasonable measures to assure that drug and/or alcohol use by employees does not jeopardize the safety of its operations or otherwise adversely affect Augusta employees, the community, or the public's trust in its ability to carry out its responsibilities. 1.1.1 Augusta cannot and will not tolerate lapses in employee control of the ability to operate safely and productively. The policy of Augusta is that if an employee required under this Policy to be tested for substance abuse either refuses or fails such test, the employee will be subject to disciplinary measures up to and including termination. 1.1.2 The employees’ cooperation with and adherence to the Augusta’s policies and procedures regarding substance abuse are conditions of their continued employment. If an employee violates or is insubordinate by refusing to cooperate with any of these policies and procedures, the employee is subject to disciplinary measures up to and including termination. 1.1.3 The following is the Augusta Substance Abuse Policy. The use of the term "Augusta", in this document, refers to the Augusta government. Augusta will make a public announcement of this Policy. Employee training will be undertaken to ensure that each individual employee understands the Policy's requirements and his/her obligation to cooperate fully in the testing program. 1.1.4 All references within this Policy to regulations, processes and procedures are available to any employee for review in the Risk Management Office located in Room 217, Municipal Building, 530 Greene Street, Augusta, Georgia 30911. 1.1.5 Augusta reserves the right to amend this Policy at any time, in its sole discretion, with 60 days' written notice to employees before implementation of the amendment(s). 1.1.6 PRESCRIPT NOTE: Federal law requires testing of certain employees within transit systems and holders of Commercial Drivers Licenses (49 CFR Parts 40 & 655). The testing requirements and procedures for these employees may be different than for employees tested under authority of Augusta. Where a requirement of this Policy differs as to regular and transit or CDL employees, such difference will be noted. From time to time Federal and State will update/revise their respective regulations. When such updates/revisions occur they will automatically become a part of this policy when they become Final Rule. 1.2 IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS POLICY TO: 1.2.1. Provide for a drug-free workplace; 1.2.2. Provide for the safety of employees, the department and the public. 1.2.3 Detect and deter the misuse of drugs and alcohol by employees of Augusta. Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 2 of 30 1.2.4 Comply with Federal, State and local regulations, policies or authority regarding substance abuse testing of employees. 1.3 REFERENCES: 1.3.1 Federal Register. 49 CFR Part 40 (as amended): Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs; Final Rule 1.3.2 Federal Register. 49 CFR Part 655 (amended 8/2001) (replaces 653/654): Prevention of Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug Use in Transit Operations 1.3.3 The Drug-Free Workplace Act, 1988 (PL 100-690) 1.3.4 Georgia Code Title 50, Chapter 24, Drug-Free Workplace 1.3.5 Federal Register, 49 CFR Part 382 (as amended); Controlled Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing (Federal Highway Administration, DOT). 1.4 DEFINITIONS: 1.4.1 Accident. For purposes of this Policy, "accident" means an occurrence or incident which results in a post-accident drug screen as outlined in Part 2.4 herein, including: For regular employees: 1.4.1.1 An incident involving a vehicle that has resulted in damage to property or physical injury to a person(s). This Section includes Transit employees and CDL Holders under the authority of Augusta; and/or 1.4.1.2 An occurrence or incident which results in the employee seeking, requiring and/or receiving medical treatment for injuries suffered in connection with the occurrence or incident. This Section includes Transit employees and CDL holders under the authority of Augusta. For Transit Employees and CDL Holders: 1.4.1.3 A vehicular accident which results in a fatality; 1.4.1.4 A vehicular accident which results in the Transit Employee or CDL Holder receiving a moving traffic citation under State or local law; 1.4.1.5 A vehicular accident where one or more of the vehicles involved receive disabling damage and cannot be moved from the scene under its own power (including a single-vehicle accident) For the purposes of this definition, disabling damage means damage which precludes departure of the vehicle from the scene of the occurrence in its usual manner in daylight after simple repairs. Disabling damage includes damage to vehicles that could have been operated but would have been further damaged if so operated, but does not include damage which can be remedied temporarily at the scene of the occurrence without special tools or parts, tire disablement without other damage even if no spare tire is available, or damage to headlights, taillights, turn signals, horn, mirrors or windshield wipers that make them inoperative; 1.4.1.6 (URBAN Transit Employees): A vehicular accident in which the performance of the Transit Employee or CDL Holder could have contributed to the accident, as determined by management using the best information on hand at the time of the determination; and/or 1.4.1.7. A vehicular accident in which any individual suffers a bodily injury and is immediately transported away from the scene of the accident for medical treatment. 1.4.2 Adulterated specimen. A specimen that contains a substance that is not expected to be present in human urine, or contains a substance expected to be present but is at a concentration so high that it is not consistent with human urine. Attachment number 4 Page 2 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 3 of 30 1.4.3 Alcohol. The intoxicating agent in beverage alcohol, ethyl alcohol, or other low molecular weight alcohols contained in any beverage, mixture, mouthwash, candy, food, preparation or medication. 1.4.4 Canceled Test. A drug test that has been declared invalid by a Medical Review Officer. A canceled test is neither a positive nor a negative. 1.4.5 Contractor. A person or organization(s) providing a service for Augusta or its subordinate departments, divisions, sections or agencies under a specific understanding or arrangement. The understanding can be a written contract or an informal arrangement that reflects an ongoing relationship between the parties. 1.4.6 Controlled Substances. (For the purposes of this Policy, see sub- paragraph 1.4.11 ("Drugs") below. 1.4.7 Designated Employer Representative (DER): An employee authorized by the employer to take immediate action to remove employees from safety-sensitive duties and to make required decisions in drug testing. The DER also receives drug test results and other communications for the employer. For the purpose of this policy, the Designated Employer Representative (DER) is the Risk Management Manger, Sandra Wright. In the absence of the Risk Management Manager, it shall be the Risk Management Loss Control Officer, Joe Crozier. This also meets the requirements of 49 CFR Parts 40 and 655. 1.4.8 Department of Transportation (DOT): Department of the federal government which includes the, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Railroad Administration, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Motor Carrier’s Safety Administration, Research and Special Programs, and the Office of the Secretary of Transportation. 1.4.9 Direct Observation Collection: Procedure is the same as a routine collection procedure with the additional requirement that an observer of the same gender as the individual physically watches the employee urinate into the collection container.(DOT rule change 2008). 1.4.10 Dilute Specimen: A specimen with creatinine and specific gravity values that are lower than expected for human urine. 1.4.11 Drugs. For the purposes of this Policy, "Drugs" include illegal street drugs, legal drugs either taken for non-medical reasons or without a valid prescription, and alcohol. It DOES NOT include prescription medication prescribed for the employee by a qualified health care provider and taken in accordance with that physician's instructions. Some of the drugs which are considered controlled substances under Federal, State or local laws include, but not limited to: marijuana, heroin, hashish, cocaine, hallucinogens, inhalants and designer drugs, and depressants and stimulants which are not prescribed for current personal treatment by a licensed physician. 1.4.12 Evidentiary Breath Testing Device (EBT): A Device approved by the NHTSA for the evidential testing of breath at the 0.02 and the 0.04 alcohol concentrations. 1.4.13 Illegal Substances. For the purposes of this Policy, see sub- paragraph 1.4.5 ("Drugs") above. 1.4.14 Medical Review Officer.(MRO) A licensed physician (medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy) responsible for reviewing laboratory results generated by the Drug Testing program, who has knowledge of substance abuse disorders and has appropriate medical training to interpret and evaluate an individual's positive test result together with his or her medical history and any other relevant biomedical information; knowledge of adulteration or substituted specimens. The MRO must also meet additional qualification training requirements which can be found in Part 40.121 of the Federal Regulations. A test result will not be deemed positive for the purpose of disciplinary action until ruled positive by the Medical Review Officer (MRO). Attachment number 4 Page 3 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 4 of 30 1.4.15 Negative-Dilute: A drug test which is negative for the five drug/drug metabolites but has a specific gravity value lower than expected for human urine, second collection is required under direct observation. 1.4.16 Safety-Sensitive Employee. Safety-sensitive employees are those who perform any of the following tasks or duties, or have the following qualifications/job requirements: 1.4.16.1 Certified Law Enforcement Officers; 1.4.16.2 Jailers of Richmond County Sheriff's Office 1.4.16.3 911 operators/ communications officers; 1.4.16.4 Fire Fighters; 1.4.16.5 Crash Fire and Rescue employees (Bush Field); 1.4.16.6 Certified Correctional Officers; 1.4.16.7 Employees who mix chemicals with water; 1.4.16.8 Employees who fuel or maintain aircraft; 1.4.16.9 Employees who maintain airfield facilities, including aircraft ramps, taxiways or active runways or median areas around ramps, taxiways and runways; 1.416.10 Employees whose responsibilities include airfield operations or planning activities, in areas described in (1.4.8.9); 1.4.16.11 Employees who maintain, repair, or install traffic control markers, signs or devices to include painting lane markers or directional indicators; 1.4.16.12 Employees of the Recreation Department, whose job responsibilities include supervising youth (defined as "minor children"),; also those coordinating food and beverage concessions sold to the public at events, requiring on-going compliance for health standard. 1.4.16.13 Operators of heavy equipment or construction type equipment, without regard to whether a CDL license is required 1.4.16.14 Employees who operate Augusta vehicles for which a Commercial Drivers' License (CDL) is required while performing safety-sensitive functions, as defined as: 1.4.16.14.1 While on duty, waiting to be dispatched, unless the driver has been relieved from duty by the employer; 1.4.16.14.2While on duty inspecting equipment as required by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR's), or otherwise inspecting, servicing, or conditioning any commercial motor vehicle at any time; 1.4.16.14.3While on duty at the driving controls of a commercial motor vehicle; 1.4.16.14.4While on duty, other than driving time, spent on or in a commercial motor vehicle (except for time spent resting in the sleeper berth); 1.4.16.14.5While on duty and loading or unloading a commercial motor vehicle, supervising, or assisting in the loading or unloading, attending a vehicle being loaded or unloaded, remaining in readiness to operate the vehicle, or in giving or receiving receipts for shipments loaded or unloaded; 1.4.16.14.6While on duty performing the driving requirements associated with an accident; 1.4.16.14.7While on duty repairing, obtaining assistance, or remaining in attendance upon a disabled vehicle 1.4.16.15 Employees who service or repair Augusta vehicles; 1.4.16.16 Control room operators, utilities department 1.4.16.17 First line supervisors of anyone listed above if their job duties require they perform the listed functions 1.4.16.18 Employees of the Transit Department performing safety-sensitive functions Attachment number 4 Page 4 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 5 of 30 ("Transit Employees"). Such functions include: 1.4.16.18.1 Operation of a revenue service vehicle, including when not in revenue service; 1.4.16.18.2 Operation of a non-revenue service vehicle, when required to be operated by a holder of Commercial Driver's license 1.4.16.18.3 Control of dispatch or movement of a revenue service vehicle; Maintenance of revenue service vehicles or equipment used in revenue service; and 1.4.16.19 Carrying a firearm for security purposes. First line supervisors of anyone listed above are also defined as "Transit Employees" and are subject to testing under this Policy if the position requires the employee to perform any of the duties listed above. 1.4.16.20 Employees of animal control who have access to and /or administer controlled substances, which are stored on the premise. 1.4.16.21 Security Officers both full-time and part-time responsible for building, court and airport security 1.4.17 Substance Abuse Professional (SAP): A licensed physician (medical doctor or doctor of osteopathy) or licensed or certified psychologist, social worker, employee assistance professional, or addiction counselor (certified by the National Association of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Counselors Certification Commission or by the International Certification Reciprocity Consortium/Alcohol and other Drug Abuse) with knowledge of and clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of drug and alcohol related disorders. 1.4.18 Substituted specimen: A specimen with creatinine and specific gravity values that are so diminished that they are not consistent with normal human urine. 1.4.19 Test Refusal: The following are considered a refusal to test and are treated the same as a positive test result if the employee: 1.4.19.1 Fails to appear for any test (excluding pre-employment) within a reasonable time, as determined by the employer, after being directed to do so by the employer. 1.4.19.2 Fails to remain at the testing site until the testing process is complete 1.4.19.3 Fails to provide a urine or breath specimen for any drug or alcohol test (for FTA/DOT this complies with Part 40 regulations). 1.4.19.4 In the case of a directly observed or monitored collection in a drug test, fails to permit the observation or monitoring of your provision of a specimen. 1.4.19.5 Fails to provide a sufficient amount of urine or breath when directed, and it has been determined, through a required medical evaluation, that there was no adequate medical explanation for the failure. 1.4.19.6 Fails or declines to take a second test the employer or collector has directed you to take. 1.4.19.7 Fails to undergo a medical examination or evaluation, as directed by the MRO as part of the verification process, or as directed by the DER as part of the “shy bladder” or “shy lung” procedures. 1.4.19.8 Fails to cooperate with any part of the testing process (e.g. refuse to empty pockets when so directed by the collector, behave in a confrontational way that disrupts the collection process. 1.4.19.9 If the MRO reports that there is a verified adulterated or substituted test result 1.4.19.10 Failure or refusal to sign Step 2 of the alcohol testing form. 1.4.19.11 If you refuse to take a test. 1.5 PROHIBITIONS: Attachment number 4 Page 5 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 6 of 30 1.5.1 The possession, unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution or presence in the body, of alcohol, drugs, controlled substances or prescription medicine for which no valid prescription is held, in the workplace, is strictly prohibited. 1.5.2 It is illegal and a violation of this Policy to take a medication prescribed for someone else - prescription medicine must be prescribed for the user by a licensed physician. 1.5.3 All employees are prohibited from consuming alcohol for four (4) hours prior to reporting for duty and for eight hours after an accident, or until he/she has been tested pursuant to this Policy. This prohibition applies equally to Transit Employees and CDL Holders by virtue of federal regulations 1.5.4 Any and all employees who are on an on-call work status will not consume alcohol while on-call status. 1.6 CONSEQUENCES FOR VIOLATIONS: The following violations will result in an employee being placed on three days administrative leave with pay with a recommendation of termination. At such time the recommendation of termination will be forwarded to the Human Resources Director for review. The Human Resources Director will schedule a conference with the Administrator or his/her designee to review the recommended termination (See Augusta Administrative Regulation 3-3). 1.6.1 Employees who have drug test results confirmed by the Medical Review Officer as positive for a prohibitive substance, 1.6.2 Employees who have a confirmed alcohol content of .04 or above, while on duty, confirmed by an evidentiary breath testing devise or blood alcohol content, 1.6.3 Employees who refuse to test under the provisions of this policy, 1.6.4 Employees who adulterate or substitute their specimens and reported by GC/MS and confirmed by the MRO, CONSEQUENCES FOR OTHER VIOLATIONS : 1.6.5 Employees whose blood alcohol content is between .02 to .039 will be removed from duty for a minimum of 8 hours and will receive appropriate disciplinary action appropriate to the “Progressive discipline” policy provisions. 1.6.6 Negative Dilute when reported by the MRO will require a second test under direct observation 1.7 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: 1.7.1 If any employee is prescribed a drug whose use may affect their job performance, that employee must immediately notify the supervisor of the prescription. For example, if an employee's prescription drug label reads that the user should not operate a car or machinery while taking the drug or that the drug causes drowsiness, and the employee operates a car or machinery in the course of employment, or if the employee is a safety-sensitive employee, that employee must notify his/her supervisor of the prescription prior to coming on duty. 1.7.2 An employee who is not on-call status, but is called during non-working hours and who have been drinking alcohol must inform the caller that the employee have been consuming alcohol and cannot respond to the request. No disciplinary action will be taken against the employee for not responding due to the consumption of alcohol when the employee is not on-call. 1.7.3 Appropriate law enforcement agencies will be notified of any controlled substances found on Augusta property and these substances will be disposed of in accordance with policies and procedures of the law enforcement agency called. 1.7.4 Employees must notify the department head if the employee is convicted of any Georgia Controlled Substances Act statute in connection with activity occurring in the workplace. This notification must be made within 5 days of the conviction. 1.8 TESTING PROCEDURES: Attachment number 4 Page 6 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 7 of 30 1.8.1 Drugs Urine tests will be used for the detection of drugs and controlled substances 1.8.1.1 Regular employees. Standards, procedures and processes for drug testing are available for review at the Risk Management office. 1.8.1.2 Transit employees and CDL Holders. Standards, procedures and processes for testing of Transit employees and CDL Holders are found in the federal regulations cited in paragraph 1.3 above, and are available for review at the Risk Management Office. 1.8.1.3 Every urine specimen shall, at a minimum, be tested for the following illegal drug usage at levels approved by FTA/DOT regulations: 1.8.1.3.1 Marijuana; 1.8.1.3.2 Cocaine; 1.8.1.3.3 Opiates; 1.8.1.3.4 Codeine/Morphine 1.8.1.3.5 6-Acetylmorphine (Heroin detector) 1.8.1.3.6 Phencyclidine (PCP) 1.8.1.3.7 Amphetamines 1.8.1.3.8 MDMA (Methylenedioxymethamphetamine – i.e. ecstasy) 1.8.2 Alcohol Breath and/or blood tests will be used for the detection of alcohol 1.8.2.1 Regular employees. Standards, procedures and processes for alcohol tests are available for review at the Risk Management office. 1.8.2.2 Transit employees and CDL Holders: Standards, procedures and processes for testing of Transit employees and CDL Holders are found in the federal regulations cited in paragraph 1.3 above, and are available for review at the Risk Management Office. 1.9 ACTIONS REQUIRED FOR POSITIVE TEST: 1.9.1 Laboratory. Once a specimen has been tested as positive on an initial screening, a confirmatory test will be conducted prior to the laboratory's reporting the specimen as a positive result. Such test shall be performed by GCMS method. 1.9.1.1 Regular Employees. Once confirmed, the laboratory will report the results with allied documentation to the MRO, through the DER /Risk Management Office. 1.9.1.2 Transit Employees and CDL Holders: All laboratory reports will be sent from the laboratory testing facility directly to the MRO. 1.9.2 Medical Review Officer. The MRO will verify all positive test results by first reviewing laboratory reports, and confirming that a proper chain of custody (procedures to account for the integrity of each specimen by tracking its handling and storage from point of collection to final disposition) was followed. 1.9.2.1 The MRO will then contact the employee to discuss the positive result. 1.9.2.2 If verification of prescription drug use is required in connection with the MRO's investigation of a positive result, the MRO shall meet personally with the employee. 1.9.2.3 Otherwise, the MRO may contact the employee by telephone. 1.9.2.4 If the MRO finds that a valid medical reason explains the positive result, the MRO will report the test results to Risk Management as negative. 1.9.2.5 If the MRO is unable to find a valid medical reason for a positive result, the positive result will be reported to the Designated Employer Representative as positive. 1.9.2.6 As a qualified medical professional, the MRO's medical judgment cannot be overturned by an arbitrator, employer, or anyone else in the testing program (in accordance with Federal Regulations - 40.149) 1.9.3 Risk Management. Attachment number 4 Page 7 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 8 of 30 For all employees other than Transit Employees and CDL Holders, Risk Management receives positive reports from the laboratory and forwards those reports to the MRO. (Reports for Transit Employees and CDL Holders are forwarded from the laboratory directly to the MRO, as outlined in paragraph 1.9.1.2 above. 1.9.3.1 Risk Management is informed of a confirmed positive test result, by the MRO; the Risk Manager (DER) will recommend to the appropriate department director that the employee should be placed on three days administrative leave with pay with a recommendation of termination from employment for a violation of this policy. 1.9.4 Department Management. Upon notification by Risk Management that an employee has tested positive for an illegal substance or be under the influence of alcohol, department management will immediately remove the employee from duty and initiate a letter of termination to the employee, refer the employee to a Substance Abuse Professional and inform the employee of their right to appeal the decision. 1.9.5 Positive Alcohol Tests 1.9.5.1 An employee with a confirmed blood-alcohol level of 0.04 or higher is in violation of this Policy. Actions in paragraph 1.9.4 above will apply. 1.9.5.2 Employees who are found to have an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater but less than 0.04 will not be permitted to perform the job duties until: The employee's alcohol concentration measures less than 0.02; or the start of the employee's next regularly scheduled duty period, but not less than eight hours following administration of the test. 1.10 TESTING OF ADDITIONAL SAMPLE. In accordance with federal and state regulations for Transit employees and CDL holders and Augusta authority for all other employees, urine drug tests shall be according to the split sample method, whereby the sample provided is divided into two bottles. Upon being notified of a positive test result by the MRO, a Transit Employee or CDL Holder may request that the split sample be tested. This request must be made within 72 hours of the MRO's notification. Requests made after 72 hours will only be accepted if the delay was due to documentable facts that were beyond the control of the employee. Testing of the split sample will be according to federal regulations. 1.10.1 EMPLOYEE PLACED ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE WITHOUT PAY: While awaiting results of split sample, employee will not be allowed to use accrued vacation time. 1.10.2 PAYMENT FOR TESTING: An employee's economic status will not bar them from having the split tested. If an employee cannot afford to pay for the testing up front, as a courtesy, Augusta will pay for this cost. Should the results from testing the split sample uphold the original positive test result, the cost of the split test will be deducted in full from the employee's next paycheck.. If there are not enough funds in the employee's paycheck to cover the testing cost(s) this does not relieve the employee from reimbursing Augusta for all associated cost incurred. 1.11 REVIEW OF TERMINATION RECOMMENDATION: The Human Resources Director or designee will schedule a grievance with the Administrator or designee to review the departmental recommendation of termination. The Administrator or designee will either uphold the recommendation for termination or reject the recommendation 1.12 REHIRING TERMINATED EMPLOYEES 1.12.1 Employees being terminated for violation of this Policy will not be considered for rehire by Augusta for a period of one year from the date the individual successfully completes an approved rehabilitation program (acceptable proof of completion of an approved rehabilitation program will be required before rehiring will be considered). 1.12.2 Employees who resign after being notified of a positive test result, by the MRO or Attachment number 4 Page 8 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 9 of 30 through the administrative process, will not be considered for rehire by Augusta, for a period of one year from the date the individual successfully completes an approved rehabilitation program. Acceptable proof of completion of an approved rehabilitation program will be required before rehiring will be considered. 1.13 ALCOHOL TESTING OF TRANSIT EMPLOYEES and CDL HOLDERS: Federal regulations stipulate specific criteria to be applied when Transit Employees and CDL Holders are tested for alcohol. Those regulations provide, in part, that: 1.13.1 Alcohol tests will only be conducted just before, during or just after the performance of safety sensitive job functions. 1.13.2 Alcohol testing will be conducted if the employee is injured, from a job related activity (on-the-job injury) and medical treatment is provided to the employee. 1.13.3 Transit employee or CDL Holder with a blood-alcohol level of .04 or higher is in violation of federal regulations and this Policy. Such employee will be immediately removed from his/her safety-sensitive duties and will be terminated. As part of this process the employee will be advised of programs available for rehabilitation, if applicable. 1.13.4 Transit Employees or CDL Holder found to have an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater but less than 0.04 will not be permitted to perform safety sensitive functions until: The employee's alcohol concentration measures less than 0.02; or the start of the employee's next regularly scheduled duty period, but not less than eight hours following administration of the test. 1.14 REFUSAL TO SUBMIT TO TESTING: 1.14.1 Refusal to submit a urine, breath and/or blood sample when required under this Policy will be considered the same as a positive test result. 1.14.2 Refusal can include; 1.14.2.1 Fail to appear for any test (except pre-employment test) within a reasonable time, as determined by the employer; 1.14.2.2 Fail to remain at the collection site until the collection process is complete; 1.14.2.3 Fail to provide a urine specimen for any drug test; 1.14.2.4 Fail to permit observation or monitoring of your provision of a specimen; 1.14.2.5 Fail to provide a sufficient urine specimen without a valid medical reason as verified by the MRO; 1.14.2.6 Fail or decline to take a second test the employer or collector has directed you to take 1.14.2.7 Fail to undergo a medical examination or evaluation, as directed by the MRO as a part of the verification process or as directed by the DER (Designated Employer Representative); 1.14.2.8 Fail to cooperate with any part of the testing process (e.g. refuse to empty pockets, behave in a confrontational way that disrupts the collection process); 1.14.2.9 If MRO reports a verified adulterated or substituted test result, this is considered a refusal; 1.14.2.10 If you refuse to take a drug test. 1.14.3 Any employee who is suspected of providing false information in connection with a test, or who is suspected of falsifying test results through tampering, contamination, or substitution shall be required to undergo an observed collection. 1.14.4 Confirmation of tampering, contamination, adulteration or substitution may result in recommendation of termination from employment. 1.15 CONFIDENTIALITY: Attachment number 4 Page 9 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 10 of 30 1.15.1 The privacy interests of employees and the legitimate interests of the Augusta in implementing and maintaining a substance abuse program will be accomplished by: 1.15.1.1 Limiting the extent of inquiries to those necessary to effectuate this Policy; 1.15.1.2 Assuring that disclosure of, and access to, information generated under this Policy is on a strict need-to-know basis; and 1.15.1.3 Informing employees of the purpose for which the information is sought. 1.15.2 If a third party requests information (for example, in the context of a reference check), regarding Augusta’s decision not to hire an applicant or not to transfer or promote or to terminate an employee, and that decision is based on a violation of this Policy by the applicant or employee, the reason given for such decision will be that the applicant or employee did not comply with policy. No further information will be given to any third party without the prior written consent of the applicant or employee, except in the following circumstances: 1.15.2.1 Information may be given to Risk Management, to laboratories and to the MRO for the purpose of administering this Policy; 1.15.2.2 Information may be given to the employee's department head, when a recommendation of disciplinary action has been made and it is that department head's responsibility to carry out such disciplinary action; 1.15.2.3 Information may be released to the Department of Labor and appropriate representatives of Augusta in the event an employee discharged for violations of this Policy applies for and/or appeals a denial of unemployment compensation; 1.15.2.4 Information may be released pursuant to an order from a court of competent jurisdiction or other tribunal; 1.15.2.5 Information may be released to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the Human Relations Commission if requested in connection with any inquiry or investigation by either such body; and 1.15.2.6 Information may be released to those persons or bodies hearing any appeal by an employee of any action taken pursuant to this Policy. 1.15.3 Release of Information as to Transit Employees or CDL Holder: 1.15.3.1 Augusta shall release information regarding a Transit Employee or CDL Holder record as directed by specific written consent from the employee authorizing release of the information to an identified person. 1.15.3.2 Transit Employee or CDL Holder is entitled, upon written request, to obtain copies of any records pertaining to his or her use of a prohibited substance, including any records pertaining to test results. 1.15.3.3 Augusta may disclose information that is required to be maintained to the decision maker in a lawsuit, grievance, or other proceeding initiated by or on behalf of the employee tested. 1.15.3.4 When requested by the National Transportation Safety Board as part of an accident investigation, Augusta shall disclose information related to its administration of drug and alcohol tests following the accident. 1.15.3.5 Records shall be made available to subsequent employers upon receipt of written request from the Employee. 1.15.3.6 Augusta shall disclose data for its drug and alcohol testing program and any other information pertaining to its anti-drug program, when requested by the Secretary of Transportation or any Department of Transportation agency with regulatory authority over the Augusta transit system or Federal Highway Administration - DOT. 1.16 CONTRACTORS: Attachment number 4 Page 10 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 11 of 30 Persons engaged by Augusta as independent contractors shall be required to comply with Georgia's Drug-Free Workplace Act, O.C.G.A. sec. 50-24-1 et seq., before they may perform services for Augusta. Compliance shall be in the form of certification before beginning services (see Appendix 1), and documentation of continuing compliance as reasonably requested by Augusta. Contractors who are also providing repair and maintenance services on DOT regulated vehicles are required to also be in compliance with applicable provisions of the DOT/FTA drug and alcohol testing regulations (Title 49 Part 40) if services are more than ad hoc or one time repairs. As long as Augusta’s population is less than 200,000 this does not apply to contractors doing business with Augusta it will only apply if and when the local population exceeds 200,000. 1.17 CHANGES TO POLICY: At times, State or Federal law may require that additional employees be tested for illegal substances, or that additional or different testing mechanisms and procedures be implemented. Said State or Federal law requirements will supersede the relevant provisions of this Policy, and this Policy may or may not be amended to reflect those changes prior to their effective date. Affected employees will be notified in advance of any implementation of changes as a result of State or Federal law requirements. 1.18 CONTACT PERSONS: The proponent agency for this Policy is the Risk Management Division of the Finance Department. Any comments, questions or recommendations applying to this policy or testing program should be referred to the Risk Management Manager, 530 Greene Street, Augusta, Georgia, 30911 (706) 821- 2301 or FAX (706) 821-2502. Because the MRO is not an employee of Augusta any employee wishing to contact the MRO should contact the Risk Management Manager. The Employee Assistance Program is "CONCERN"- EAP; located at 961 Broad Street - 722-2353 or 1-800-285- 2353. SECTION 2 - INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT TO TESTING 2.1 APPLICANTS/NEW EMPLOYEES: All applicants who have been extended a conditional job offer will be required to undergo the following as part of the employment process: 2.1.1 Regular New Hires 2.1.1.1 Submit to a substance abuse test for illegal substances prior to becoming an an employee of Augusta. Such screening must be completed within 24 hours of the time the applicant is instructed to submit to the screening. Any screening not completed within that 24 hour period will not be accepted 2.1.1.2 Sign a Substance Abuse Coverage Form (Form SA 1, a copy of which is attached as Appendix 2) within 45 days of the first day of work.. This form states that the applicant has read, understands and agrees that he/she is subject to this Policy as a condition of employment with Augusta. The signed form will be retained in the employee's personnel file. 2.1.1.3 Sign a Test Consent Form (SA-3, a copy which is attached as Appendix 3). This form authorizes Augusta and/or its representatives to perform the appropriate tests to identify the presence of drugs or controlled substances and releases test results as necessary to administer this Policy. The signed form will be forwarded to Risk Management where it will be retained in the employee's drug test file. 2.1.1.4 Refusal of an applicant to sign SA-3 will remove the applicant from consideration for employment with Augusta since the employment process cannot be completed. 2.1.2 Transit Applicant or New Hire and Holders of Commercial Driver's License Attachment number 4 Page 11 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 12 of 30 2.1.2.1 Submit to a pre-employment substance abuse screening for illegal substances prior to becoming an employee of Augusta. Such screening must be completed prior to performing any safety sensitive function. 2.1.2.2 Sign a Substance Abuse Coverage Form (Form SA-2, a copy of which is attached as Appendix 2) within 45 days of the first day of work, which form states that the applicant has read, understands and agrees that he/she is subject to this Policy as a condition of employment with Augusta. The signed form will be retained in the employee's personnel file. 2.1.2.3 No Form SA-3 (Consent Form) is required. This is due to prohibition by FTA for employee to sign any type of waiver including a consent form. 2.1.2.4 Sign an Information Request Form allowing AUGUSTA to submit request on drug testing history from any DOT-regulated employers for whom you have worked within the previous two years. (appendix 7 SA-7) 2.1.2.5 If you have failed or refused a DOT drug or alcohol pre-employment test within the previous two years you must provide this information when requested. 2.2 TRANSFERS/PROMOTIONS: 2.2.1 Any employee who transfers or is promoted into a safety-sensitive position will be drug tested prior to assuming the duties of the position. 2.2.2 Any employee who is promoted or transferred so as to become a Transit Employee or CDL Holder will be drug tested, in accordance with Federal regulations, prior to assuming the duties of that position. 2.3 RETURN TO DUTY: 2.3.1 Regular Employees: 2.3.1.1 Employees who have successfully completed a rehabilitation program will be required to take a drug and/or alcohol test with a negative result prior to returning to work. 2.3.1.2 Employees registering between .02 to .04 (but not including .04) on an alcohol breath-testing devise will be tested prior to returning to duty to ensure the blood alcohol content is below .02 2.3.2 Transit Employees or CDL Holders: 2.3.2.1 Transit Employees or CDL Holders who are out of work due to workers compensation leave for 8 days or more will be drug tested prior to resuming safety sensitive duties. 2.3.1.2 Transit Employees or CDL Holders are required to take a pre-employment substance abuse test if they have not performed a safety-sensitive function for 90 consecutive calendar days regardless of the reason (exception – if employee has remained in random pool during that time, no pre-employment test is required) 2.4 POST-ACCIDENT: 2.4.1 Regular Employees. 2.4.1.1 Any employee involved in an incident involving a vehicle where there is property damage or injury to another person will be drug and alcohol tested. Under the authority of Augusta this includes Transit employees and CDL holders. 2.4.1.2 Any employee involved in an accident or incident in the course of employment who is injured and who requires and/or receives medical treatment for the injury will be drug and alcohol tested. 2.4.1.3 Employees who receive medical treatment for an occupational exposure (exposure to disease, bloodborne pathogen) will not be drug or alcohol tested, if the treatment is solely for the occupational exposure. Any employee will be drug and alcohol tested when, while operating a government motor vehicle, an accident occurs and results in a fatality. Attachment number 4 Page 12 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 13 of 30 2.4.2 Transit Employees and CDL Holders Federal regulations establish the criteria for post- accident testing for Transit Employees or CDL Holders. Testing will be administered when: 2.4.2.1 a fatality occurs from an accident; 2.4.2.2 the employee receives a citation under State or local law for a moving traffic violation arising from the accident; 2.4.2.3 a vehicle accident occurs and any of the vehicles cannot move from the accident scene under there own power. This also applies to a single vehicle accident; or 2.4.2.4 the performance of an employee could have contributed to the accident, as determined by management using the best information at the time of the decision. 2.4.3 Employees will be tested as soon as possible after the accident but not more than 32 hours after the accident. If a test has been required by law enforcement and employer cannot test employee within given time limit, employer can request a copy of the test results from the authorizing agency. 2.4.4 Employees who are injured in the course of their employment, and refuse medical treatment may be tested under the provisions of "For Cause" testing. The injury must be of such gravity as to obviously require medical attention. 2.5 FOR-CAUSE (REASONABLE SUSPICION): 2.5.1 Any employee may be tested for illegal substances and/or alcohol when, based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech, or body odors of an employee, it is determined that there is reasonable suspicion that the employee is violating this Policy. If you suspect an employee to be under the influence of alcohol or other drugs while at work, the following steps are to be taken when requesting a drug screen: Step 1: Call Risk Management Manager 821-2486 or Human Resources Director 821- 2309. Step 2: Relay all known factors/information concerning reasons for suspicion (not just a “gut” feeling, must be able to give description/specifics/observation at that moment in time not days earlier). Use the FOR CAUSE TEST AUTHORIZATION FORM, Form SA-3, found in the Substance Abuse Policy. Fill out items #1, #2 to include all reasons, #3 and date. Then submit to Risk Management. The information is then evaluated and support/approval may or may not be given based on certain criteria. Step 3: Approval – if the request is approved, the employee in question is to sign the Substance Abuse Consent Form (Form SA-3) PRIOR to being taken for testing. When fully executed, this form is then to be delivered in to Risk Management. Step 4: ALCOHOL – If the employee is being tested for alcohol: a. The employee is to be taken to the designated collection site by the Director or high ranking supervisor (the fact of testing is to be kept totally confidential). b. If the test result is negative the employee is allowed to return to work. c. If the breath/blood test is confirmed positive, the employee is to be processed through the normal termination process channels (i.e. placing employee on three-day administrative leave with pay with recommendation of termination). d. Under no circumstances is the employee allowed to operate a vehicle, to include his/her own personal vehicle. A taxicab will be provided to transport the individual directly to his/her residence if a family member is not available. This will be arranged through Risk Management. Step 5: OTHER DRUGS – If the employee is being tested for drugs other than alcohol: Attachment number 4 Page 13 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 14 of 30 a. The employee is taken by the Director or high ranking supervisor (the fact of testing is to be kept totally confidential) to the designated collection site for testing. b. When the collection process has been completed the employee is NOT allowed to return to work and is placed on administrative leave (leave with pay) pending the outcome of the testing. c. If the test results are negative the employee is allowed to return to work 2.5.2 An illegal substance screening which shows that a specimen may have been diluted, tampered with, or substituted will be considered reasonable suspicion for additional, for- cause testing. 2.5.3 The number of employees requested to participate in a for-cause screening based on a workplace incident may range from a single individual to all personnel who were involved in the incident or had access to the work area in which the incident occurred. 2.5.4 To initiate a for-cause screening, the appropriate Department Head will use the For-Cause Test Authorization Form (SA-4) attached as Appendix 4. 2.6 RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM: 2.6.1 General. 2.6.1.1 Employees classified as safety-sensitive will be randomly tested for illegal substances. A safety-sensitive employee may be tested up to once per month. 2.6.1.2 Criteria and standards for random testing for regular employees are available for review in the Risk Management Office. Criteria and standards for random testing of Transit Employees and CDL Holders are found in the federal regulations cited above, which are available for review in the Risk Management Office. 2.6.2 PROGRAM INTEGRITY: To ensure the selection process maintains true random integrity, no names, social security numbers, employee numbers or any other identification of individuals will be provided to the agency which is responsible for selecting the random numbers to be tested, which numbers are generated through a computer program. 2.6.3 Random Selection/Testing Process STEP 1: Notification Process Risk Management a. Request sequence numbers from designated service provider on a monthly basis b. Receive numbers, match numbers with names in spreadsheet maintained in Risk Management c. Generate letter for each individual selected, attach Consent Form and Collection Site Checklist. Letters grouped by department, give to Risk Manager for signature. d. Send letters to Department Point of Contact via courier (point of contact determined by Department Director Department Point of Contact a. Receives packet of letters from Risk Management containing monthly selections for drug screening. Point of Contact secures letters to maintain confidentiality of information. Remainder of internal process is developed by department (employees who are selected are not to have notice of their selection prior to receipt of notification letter from Risk Management. Testing is to be spread out throughout the month - do not try to test all employees within a few days. Attachment number 4 Page 14 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 15 of 30 Suggestion for internal process: When feasible, only Point of Contact gives letter to each employee. b. After employee receives this notification, the Point of Contact places the current date and time in appropriate area on letter Employee then signs and dates Consent Form, witnessed by person giving the notice. (Important: once notified, the employee has 30 minutes to arrive at the collection facility listed in letter). c. Consent Form is left with Point of Contact who sends form back to Risk Management to be maintained in employee drug testing file. d. Employee carries letter showing date and time along with Collection Procedures Checklist to the facility designated as the collection site. STEP 2: Collection Site a. Upon arrival at collection site, employee follows guidelines of collection site (signing in, providing photo identification - driver's license, etc.). b. Employee gives letter to Collection Site who verifies timeliness of arrival. c. Employee and Collector will initial appropriate step, as it is completed on Collection Procedures Checklist. STEP 3: Notification by Laboratory of Testing Results a. Risk Management is notified directly of all drug test results except those under Federal and DOT Regulations (those results go directly to the designated Medical Review Officer). Notification is done through a dedicated fax machine for drug testing results only. b. Upon receipt of a drug screen showing a positive test result, Risk Management immediately delivers appropriate paperwork to the Medical Review Officer for determination of test results. Medical Review Officer contacts employee at work or home (whichever is the most expedient). c. Upon questioning employee concerning test results, Medical Review Officer makes official determination of positive or negative test results. d. Medical Review Officer contacts Risk Manager with official results, which are then faxed for documentation purposes. e. Upon receipt of documentation, Risk Management contacts appropriate Department Director of employee. Verbal notification is given with instructions on policy, which is followed up by written notification and instructions. Written notification includes a sample letter for Department Director to use for notification to employee SECTION 3 - ANNUAL TRAINING 3.1 NEW EMPLOYEES: All full-time, regular new employees will be required to attend orientation prior to beginning their normal work schedule. The orientation will include a program for Drug Awareness/ Effects of Drug Abuse and a briefing on this Policy. 3.2 TRANSIT EMPLOYEES and CDL HOLDERS: 3.2.1 All Transit Employees and CDL Holders, whether full-time or part-time, will be required to attend an orientation prior to performing any safety sensitive function. Orientation will include a program for Drug Awareness/ Effects of Drug Abuse and a briefing on this Policy. Attachment number 4 Page 15 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 16 of 30 Transit Employees and CDL Holders will also be required to attend a one- hour training session on the effects and consequences of prohibited drug use on personal health, safety, and the work environment and on the signs and symptoms, which may indicate, prohibited drug use. An additional hour of training will be required regarding alcohol. 3.2.2 Supervisors of Transit Employees and CDL Holders who may make reasonable suspicion determinations will be required to attend one hour of training on drug abuse and one hour on alcohol abuse. 3.3 ANNUAL TRAINING: All employees will be required to attend a one-hour class on the effects of Drug and Alcohol abuse each year. SECTION 4 - REHABILITATION POLICY 4.1 REHABILITATION POLICY: 4.1.1 Voluntary Participation. When a regular employee (not probationary, part-time or temporary) comes forward PRIOR to notification of a random or for-cause test or PRIOR to an accident and/or injury, seeking help with a substance abuse problem, that employee will be allowed to enter an approved rehabilitation program, as outlined below. The employee is subject to all of the provisions of the rehabilitation policy. If a regular employee DOES NOT come forward as described above, and tests positive on an illegal substance screening, that employee will be immediately recommended for termination from employment. 4.1.1.1 Any employee who desires to voluntarily participate in rehabilitation will be allowed to enter an approved detoxification and/or rehabilitation program with no Augusta participation in cost other than as provided under the employee's group health insurance program. 4.1.1.2 The employee will be allowed the use of any accrued leave time (sick and/or vacation) during his/her absence from work for this treatment. If there is no leave time available, the employee will be placed on leave without pay. 4.1.1.3 Prior to returning to work, the employee shall submit to the Risk Management Division, in writing, proof of completion of the program and competence to return to work. 4.1.1.4 Employees who have completed a detoxification and/or rehabilitation program will not be afforded any further opportunity by Augusta or through Augusta's resources to re-enter a detoxification and/or rehabilitation program for a second time. 4.1.2 Participation in Rehabilitation Directly through EAP. If any employee comes forward voluntarily directly to the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) (without first going through either Human Resources or Risk Management), and the EAP finds that the employee is a risk to the safety of himself/herself and/or others, the EAP will notify Risk Management that the employee is seeking treatment directly through EAP. 4.1.2.1 The employee will not be terminated from employment unless the employee fails to enter and successfully complete the substance abuse program designed for him/her by the EAP; however, such employee shall be placed on leave until such time as he/she is no longer considered a risk to the safety of himself/herself and/or others. 4.1.2.2 The EAP will keep Augusta informed of the employee's progress through the rehabilitation program. 4.1.2.3 The employee will be required to sign a statement prior to being admitted to Attachment number 4 Page 16 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 17 of 30 the EAP acknowledging that Augusta may be notified of his entry into the program under the above circumstances. 4.1.3 Failure to Complete Rehabilitation. Employees who do not successfully complete a rehabilitation program will be terminated and may not be considered for re-hiring for a period of one year from the date of termination. 4.1.3.1 Acceptable proof of satisfactory completion of a rehabilitation program will be required before re-hiring will be considered. 4.1.4 Disciplinary Action. Referral to the EAP does not deprive Augusta of the option of taking disciplinary action against any employee in accordance with this Policy. 4.2 POST REHABILITATION: 4.2.1 Any employee who successfully completes a rehabilitation program and returns to work will be considered a probationary employee for the next three-year period. 4.2.1.1 The classification of "probationary" applies to substance abuse testing only, when used in the context of this Policy. The employee shall be responsible for the costs of such tests. 4.2.1.2 An employee's refusal or failure of any such test will cause the employee to be immediately terminated. 4.2.2 Prior to returning to work, the employee will be tested for illegal substances and will be tested on an unannounced basis thereafter during the period of probation, said testing not to exceed 12 times each year. SECTION 5 . RELATIONSHIP TO PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED PROCEDURE 5.1 Administrative Regulation 3-1, Augusta Substance Abuse Policy revisions are effective November 2008 or until notice is given that this regulation is modified, reissued or cancelled. 5.2 No qualifying statement, previously established rule(s) or procedure(s) shall be used to negate the spirit or intent of this statement or policy. SECTION 6. APPENDICES: 1. Contractor Certificate (FORM SA-1)(Appendix 1) 2. Substance Abuse Coverage Form (FORM SA-2)(Appendix 2) 3. Test Consent Form (FORM SA-3)(Appendix 3) (Not for use by Transit/CDL - Fed Regulation) 4. For Cause Test Authorization Form (FORM SA-4)(Appendix 4) 5. Supervisor Referral Form (FORM SA-5) (Appendix 5) 6. Collection Site Checklist (FORM SA-6)(Appendix 6) 7. Information Request Form (FORM SA-7)(Appendix 7) (Transit/CDL Pre-Empl) 8. Alcohol Fact Sheet 9. Substance Abuse Index Augusta Commission Approved: June 2, 2009 Revision Effective Date: August 2, 2009 ___________________________________________ Fred Russell, Administrator Attachment number 4 Page 17 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 18 of 30 APPENDIX 1 CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATE I,___________________________________________of________________________________________ (Contractor/Vendor's Certifying Official) (Company Name) _______________________________________________________________________________________ (Address) certify that a drug-free workplace will be provided for the employees of this company during the performance of this contract pursuant to section 50-24-3 of O.C.G.A. I further certify that in accordance with O.C.G.A. 50-24-3 paragraph (a) subsection (2), that should this company require the services of a subcontractor as part of this contract, that all subcontractors will be required to provide this company with a certificate of compliance for the establishment of a Drug Free Work Place. I understand that a drug-free work place may be provided by my: (1) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, sale, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance or marijuana is prohibited in the contractor's/subcontractor's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition; (2) Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about: a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; b. The contractor's/subcontractor's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; c. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance program; and d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. (3) Providing each employee with a copy of the statement provided for in paragraph (1) above. (4) Notifying each employee in the statement provided for in paragraph (1) above, that as a condition of employment, the employee shall: a. Abide by the terms of the statement; and b. Notify the contractor/subcontractor of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the work place within five days of the conviction; (5) Notifying the contracting principal representative within ten days after receiving from an employee or a subcontractor a notice of conviction as provided under paragraph (4),b above or otherwise receiving actual notice of such a conviction; (6) Making a good faith effort on a continuing basis to provide a drug-free workplace for employees; and (7) Requiring that such contractor/subcontractor include in any agreement or contract with a subcontractor a provision that such subcontractor will provide a drug-free workplace for his employees by complying with the provisions of paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (6) listed above. _________________________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________________________ (Printed Name & Title) FORM SA-1 Attachment number 4 Page 18 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 19 of 30 APPENDIX 2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE COVERAGE FORM I, ____________________________________, have read and understand the Augusta Substance Abuse Policy (the "Policy"). I further understand that the manufacture, use, possession, sale or distribution or presence in body of alcohol, drugs or illegal substances in the work place is strictly prohibited and will lead to my immediate discharge from employment. For purposes of this Policy, "drugs" or "illegal substances" or "controlled substances" is defined to include illegal street drugs, legal drugs either taken for non-medical reasons or without a valid prescription and alcohol, but not to include prescription medication taken in accordance with a physician's prescription and instructions. I also understand that the presence of such substances in my system during work hours places unacceptable risk and burden on the safe and efficient operation of my job, and, consequently, is strictly forbidden. I understand that if I am a Transit employee or an employee required to have a CDL I will be tested in accordance with testing requirements established by Federal regulations. I understand that if I work in a safety-sensitive position (as that is defined in the Policy), I may be tested for illegal substances on a random basis. I also understand that Augusta has a zero tolerance policy for safety - sensitive employees, such that I will be terminated for any violation of the Substance Abuse Policy. I understand that based on reasonable suspicion, I may be tested for illegal substances (a "for-cause test"). I understand that if I successfully complete a rehabilitation program and return to work for the Augusta Commission, I may be tested for illegal substances on a random basis up to twelve times per year for three years and that it is my responsibility to pay for these tests as a condition of my employment. I understand that if I am involved in an accident, which results in property damage or injury to another person; or in my requiring and/or receiving medical attention for injuries, I may be tested for illegal substances (a "post-accident test"). I understand that Federal testing requirements, for Transit employees and holders of CDL licenses, may require drug and/or alcohol testing in cases of vehicle accidents, even though there may be no injuries. I also understand that my arrest and/or conviction for off-the-job drug and/or alcohol activities, including driving under the influence, may constitute grounds for reasonable suspicion and a for-cause illegal substances screening, and may cause me to have action taken against me, taking into consideration (among other things), the nature of the charges, my job assignment and my record with the Augusta Commission. I understand that it is my responsibility to read the Augusta Substance Abuse Policy entirely, and that my cooperation with, and adherence to, policies and procedures regarding substance abuse are conditions of my employment and that if I violate or am insubordinate by refusing to cooperate with any of these policies and procedures, I am subject to discipline up to and including discharge. Employee Signature:_____________________________________ Date:____________________________ FORM SA-2 Attachment number 4 Page 19 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 20 of 30 APPENDIX 3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE TEST CONSENT FORM I, __________________________________, do hereby give my consent to the Augusta (or its agent(s)) to collect a urine, breath and/or blood sample from me to determine if I have used illegal drugs or misused alcohol and/or drugs or controlled substances (including the misuse of any legal drugs). I further give my consent to Augusta to forward the sample(s) to a qualified laboratory for its performance of appropriate tests thereon to identify the presence of substances illegal under the Substance Abuse Policy. I further give the testing laboratory my permission to release the results of such test to Augusta, Risk Management and/or the Medical Review Officer for the Augusta government. I understand that refusal to submit to testing or providing false information in connection with a test is considered the same as a positive test result. I hereby certify that I will not adulterate or substitute any urine sample given under the Substance Abuse Policy. Employee Signature: __________________________________________ DATE:_________________________________________ WITNESS:____________________________________ DATE:________________________________________ FORM SA-3 Attachment number 4 Page 20 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 21 of 30 APPENDIX 4 ***PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL*** FOR-CAUSE/REASONABLE SUSPICION DRUG TEST AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR-CAUSE TEST is requested for: Print Employee Name: Payroll #: Department: Job Title Physical Signs or Symptoms 1. Possessing, dispensing, or using prohibited substance. 2. Slurred or incoherent speech 3. Bloodshot or watery eyes 4. Odor of alcohol 5. Odor of Marijuana 6. Runny nose or sores around nostrils. 7. Puncture marks or "tracks" 8. Loss of physical control, poor coordination, unsteady gait. 9. Extreme fatigue or sleeping on the job. 10. Flushed or very pale face 11. Nausea or vomiting 12. Disheveled appearance or out of uniform 13. Dizziness or fainting 14. Highly excited or nervous 15. Dilated or constricted pupils or unusual eye movement 16. Excessive sweating or clamminess of skin 17. Shaking hands or body tremors. 18. Dry mouth 19. Breathing irregularity or difficult breathing 20. Inappropriate wearing of sunglasses. 21. Other (describe below) 5. Has there been a change to the employee's quality and quantity of work? NO If so describe: 6. Has the employee's work relationships changed with fellow employees? NO If so, describe: 7. Does the employee appear to "bring his personal/family problems" to work more than usual? NO If so, describe: 8. Have you noticed any recent changes in personality, moods, or behavior? NO If so, describe: FORM SA-4 Page 1 of 2 Attachment number 4 Page 21 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 22 of 30 PAGE 2 FOR-CAUSE REASONABLE SUSPICION DRUG TEST AUTHORIZATION FORM NATURE OF INCIDENT/CAUSE FOR SUSPICION 1. Observed possession or use of a prohibited substance 2. Apparent drug or alcohol intoxication. 3. Observed abnormal or erratic behavior. 4. Other: 2. Test requested by: Signature Date: Printed Name: Payroll #: Job Title: Department: 3. TEST AUTHORIZED BY: Signature: Date: Printed Name: Empl #: Job Title: Department: Additional Information ______________________________________________________________________ FORM SA-4 Page 2 of 2 Attachment number 4 Page 22 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 23 of 30 APPENDIX 5 CONCERN: EAP SUPERVISORY REFERRAL FORM - C O N F I D E N T I A L - NOTE: NOT FOR INCLUSION IN PERSONNEL FILE - Please print or type This form is to be used as a guide in determining the extent and exact nature of the decline of your employee's job performance. Please review the form with your employee, and be sure that both parties sign. Please call if you have any questions. Upon completion of the form please forward to: CONCERN, Employee Assistance Program, 2610-B Commons Blvd, Augusta, GA 30909 Telephone: 706-667-2353, Toll Free 1-800-285-2353, FAX: 706-667-2303 Name and Title of Employee : Company: Augusta Government Department: CHANGES IN WORK BEHAVIOR (√_) (Please explain in detail indicating when you first noticed changes.) Frequent short absences Tardiness Unexplained disappearances from work station: Reduced quantity of work Reduced quality of work Erratic work performance Missed deadlines Complaints from fellow workers Errors due to inattention or poor judgment Repeated minor accidents on or off job Inability to concentrate Irritability: Overreaction to criticism FORM SA-5 Page 1 of 2 Attachment number 4 Page 23 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 24 of 30 CONCERN: EAP SUPERVISORY REFERRAL FORM Complaints of not feeling well: Undependable statements: Deteriorating appearance: Outside forces (i.e., family and financial garnishments) beginning to interfere with work: Hospitalized more than should be expected: Changes in personality pattern: The above listing is intended only as a guide. These indicators are most reliably applied to employees who have been good performers in the past but who have had a recent decline in job performance. Additional Information: (Please list any additional information or comments, which you feel, could be helpful. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) RELEASE OF INFORMATION: (To be reviewed and signed during interview) I authorize CONCERN: EAP to advise the person listed below whether or not I scheduled and/or kept an appointment for services. EMPLOYEE: ________________ DATE: _____________________ Supervisor Title: Telephone Date: CONTACT PERSON: TELEPHONE: (If different from above) FORM SA-5 Page 2 of 2 Attachment number 4 Page 24 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 25 of 30 APPENDIX 6 Collection Procedures Check List Employee Last Name: ______________ First Name__________ Employee number: _________ PLEASE READ!!!! In an effort to provide the best protection possible for each employee and the collection agent, this checklist is being provided for use with each collection. Your participation is required to ensure that each step of the collection process is completed to standard. You will be required to initial each block by the procedure you were involved in. Your initials signify that the procedure was completed properly. If there is any deviation of procedures you should make a note at the bottom of the sheet and sign your name. Designated Employer Representative is Sandy Wright, Risk Management…direct any questions of concerns to the DER. # Procedure Collector Donor 1 Prepare collection site; ensure coloring agent present in commode. 2 Verify identity of employee with picture ID. 3 Prepare Top section of Chain of Custody form: (donor ID, reason for test) 4 If required: ask donor to remove bulky or unnecessary items (exterior clothing, store in secure area. 5 Employee washes hands and returns to the collector. 6 Collector gives (sealed collection bottle) or lets donor pick (non-sealed collection bottle). NOTE: only one collection container allowed in the rest room. 7 Employee/donor provides urine sample in the collection container and immediately provides the container to the collector. (Note: do not flush the commode until told to do so) 8 Collector annotates the temperature on the Chain of Custody form and insures there is at least 45 ml. If the temperature is outside the acceptable range follow the procedures of SAMSHA. 9 Donor observes the splitting of the sample and sealing. 10 Collector splits the sample, writes the date on the labels/seals and seals the containers (In the presence of the donor). 11 Donor initials security seal. 12 Donor flushes the commode and washes hands. 13 Donor reads the certification statement of the Chain of Custody form and signs the form. 14 Collector completes the Chain of Custody form and provides copy to the employee/donor. Collector Comments: Employee Comments: CERTIFICATION I certify that the above procedures were satisfactorily completed and that any questions concerning the procedure by the employee were satisfied at the time of the collection. I also state that I was given the opportunity to write comments concerning any aspect of the collection process. __________________________________ _____________ ____________________________________ (Signature of Collector) (Date) (Signature of Employee) NOTE: This form is an internal document for use by Augusta Risk Management and is not required by DOT/FTA FORM SA-6 Attachment number 4 Page 25 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 26 of 30 APPENDIX 7 Information Request Form (Pre-Employment Transit) I, _________________________________________ hereby allow Augusta Transit (Applicant) (Transit Agency) to contact my former DOT -regulated employer(s), from the past two years, to request the following information in accordance with 49CFR part 40.25. 1. Alcohol test results of 0.04 or higher alcohol concentration. 49CFR part 40.25(b)(1) 2. Verified positive drug tests. 49CFR part 40.25(b)(2) 3. Refusals to be tested (including verified adulterated or substituted drug test results.) 49CFR part 40.25(b)(3) 4. Other violations of DOT agency drug and alcohol testing regulations. 49CFR part 40.25(b)(4) 5. With respect to any employee who violated a DOT drug and alcohol regulation, Documentation of the employee's successful completion of DOT return-to-duty Requirements (including follow-up tests). 49CFR part 40.25(b)(5) Please list former employer(s) with contact information. _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ In respect to DOT drug and alcohol testing regulations over the past two years…… Have you ever had an alcohol test results of 0.04 or higher? Yes___ No ___ Have you ever had a verified positive drug test? Yes___ No ___ Have you ever refused to be tested (including verified adulterated or substituted drug test results.) Yes___ No ___ Have you violated any DOT agency drug and alcohol testing regulation? Yes___ No ___ If you have violated a DOT drug and alcohol regulation, do you have documentation of successful completion of DOT return-to-duty requirements (including follow-up tests)? Yes___ No___ FAILURE TO PROVIDE WRITTEN CONSENT, INCLUDING FORMER EMPLOYER(S) INFORMATION, ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS AND SIGNATURE, WILL RESULT IN YOU BEING DISQUALIFIED FOR A SAFETY SENSITIVE POSITION WITH AUGUSTA TRANIT, AS PER 49CFR PART 40.25(a). Applicant Signature ___________________________________ Date ___________ Witness Signature ____________________________________ Date ___________ FORM SA-7 Attachment number 4 Page 26 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 27 of 30 APPENDIX 8 ALCOHOL FACT SHEET Alcohol is a socially acceptable drug that has been consumed throughout the world for centuries. It is considered a recreational beverage when consumed in moderation for enjoyment and relaxation during social gatherings. However, when consumed primarily for its physical and mood-altering effects, it is a substance of abuse. As a depressant; it slows down physical responses and progressively impairs mental functions. Signs and Symptoms of Use ◊ Dulled mental processes ◊ Lack of Coordination ◊ Odor of alcohol on breath ◊ Possible constricted pupils ◊ Sleepy or stuporous conditions ◊ Slowed reaction rate ◊ Slurred speech (NOTE: Except for the odor, these are general signs and symptoms of any depressant substance) Health Effects The chronic consumption of alcohol (average of three servings per day of beer [12 ounces], whiskey [1 ounce], or wine [6 ounce glass]) over time may result in the following health hazards: ◊ Decreased sexual functioning ◊ Dependency (up to 10 percent of all people who drink alcohol become physically and/or mentally dependent on alcohol and can be termed "alcoholic"). ◊ Fatal liver diseases ◊ Increased cancers of the mouth, tongue, pharynx, esophagus, rectum, breast and malignant melanoma. ◊ Kidney disease ◊ Pancreatitis ◊ Spontaneous abortion and neonatal mortality ◊ Ulcers ◊ Birth defects (up to 54 percent of all birth defects are alcohol related). Social Issues ◊ Two-Thirds of all homicides are committed by people who drink prior to the crime. ◊ Two to three percent of the driving population is legally drunk at any one time. This rate is doubled at night and on weekends. ◊ Two thirds of all Americans will be involved in an alcohol-related vehicle accident during their lifetimes. ◊ The rate of separation and divorce in families with alcohol dependency problems is 7 times the average FORM SA-8 Page 1 of 2 Attachment number 4 Page 27 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 28 of 30 APPENDIX 8 continued: ALCOHOL FACT SHEET (Continued) ◊ Forty percent of family court cases are alcohol problem related. ◊ Alcoholics are 15 times more likely to commit suicide than are other segments of the population. ◊ More than 60 percent of burns, 40 percent of falls, 69 percent of boating accidents, and 76 percent of private aircraft accidents are alcohol related. THE ANNUAL TOLL ◊ 24,000 people will die on the highway due to the legally impaired driver. ◊ 12,000 more will die on the highway due to the alcohol-affected driver. ◊ 15,800 will die in non-highway accidents. ◊ 30,000 will die due to alcohol-caused liver disease. ◊ 10,000 will die due to alcohol-induced brain disease or suicide. ◊ Up to another 125,000 will die due to alcohol-related conditions or accidents. Workplace Issues ◊ It takes one hour for the average person (150 pounds) to process one serving of an alcoholic beverage from the body. ◊ Impairment in coordination and judgment can be objectively measured with as little as two drinks in the body. ◊ A person who is legally intoxicated is 6 times more likely to have an accident than a sober person. FORM SA-8 Page 2 of 2 Attachment number 4 Page 28 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 29 of 30 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT AUGUSTA POLICY AND PROCEDURES ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Augusta Policy and Procedures on Substance Abuse on the date written below. I further acknowledge and understand that it is my responsibility to read and understand the policies and procedures included in this administrative regulation. By way of this acknowledgement, I acknowledge that I have been informed that the Augusta-Richmond County Commission may add to, revoke, and/or modify the policies and procedures from time to time. Date Employee Signature Employee Printed Name Employee Number FORM SA-9 Attachment number 4 Page 29 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 30 of 30 SUBSTANCE ABUSE POLICY INDEX INDEX Section Paragraph TITLE PAGE 1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE 1.1 Policy Statement 1 1.2 Policy Intent 1 1.3 References 2 1.4 Definitions 2 1.5 Prohibitions 4 1.6 Consequences for Violations 5 1.7 Notification Requirements 5 1.8 Testing Procedures 5 1.9 Actions Required for Positive Test 6 1.10 Testing of Additional Sample 7 1.11 Review of Termination Recommendation 7 1.12 Rehiring Terminated Employees 7 1.13 Alcohol Testing of Transit Employees 7 1.14 Refusal to Submit to Testing 8 1.15 Confidentiality 8 1.16 Contractors 9 1.17 Changes to Policy 10 1.18 Contact Persons 10 2 INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT TO TESTING 2.1 Applicants/ New Employees 10 2.2 Transfers/Promotions 11 2.3 Return to Duty 11 2.4 Post Accident 11 2.5 For Cause 12 2.6 Random 13 3 TRAINING 3.1 New Employees 14 3.2 Transit Employees 15 3.3 Annual Training 15 4 REHABILITATION POLICY 4.1 Rehabilitation Policy 15 4.2 Post Rehabilitation 16 5 PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED POLICIES 18 APPENDICES 1 thru 10 1 Contractor Certificate (SA-1) 19 2 Substance Abuse Coverage Form (SA-2) 20 3 Test Consent Form (SA-3) 21 4 For Cause Test Authorization Form (SA-4) 22 5 Supervisor Referral Form (EAP) (SA-5) 24 6 Collection Procedure Checklist (SA-6) 26 7 Information Request Form (Transit) (SA-7) 27 8 Alcohol Fact Sheet (SA-8) 28 9 Acknowledgement of Receipt (SA-9) 29 10 Substance Abuse Policy Index 30 Attachment number 4 Page 30 of 31 Item # 25 Augusta Substance Abuse Policy Administrative Regulation No. 3-1 Oct 1, 2010 Page 31 of 30 Attachment number 4 Page 31 of 31 Item # 25 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Workers’ Compensation Third Party Administration Service Agreement Department:Finance/Risk Management Division Caption:Motion to approve continuing service agreement with Georgia Administrative Services (GAS) as the third party administrator for Augusta, GA’s Workers’ Compensation claims program. (Approved by Finance Committee September 13, 2010) Background:The service agreement for Worker’s Compensation third party administration (TPA) is up for renewal. Georgia Administrative Services is our current provider and is providing a high level of service as Augusta’s TPA for its Worker’s Compensation Program. Claims and payments have been handled in a timely manner as have mandatory filings with the State Board of Worker’s Compensation, the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund and excess insurance company. Georgia Administrative Services has been found to be highly knowledgeable and efficient in the administration of this area. They are the only TPA service known to have their home office in the State of Georgia which tends to give them an advantage in the area of Georgia worker’s compensation law. Continuing service with GAS would give continuity to claims currently managed under their administration. Analysis: Financial Impact:3-Year contract reflects no price increase and results in a total three year cost of $232,833($77,611 /year). Alternatives:Place service agreement out for bid. A negative impact is likely with this alternative. Unlike health insurance, workers’ compensation injury files, opened and closed, would need to be transferred to new TPA. New TPA would then need to familiarize themselves with all open claim files (very time consuming), with professional network currently in place and with the operations of Augusta GA Worker’s Compensation processes and procedures in order to properly administer account. Recommendation:Approve 3-year service agreement with Georgia Administrative Services for third party administration services for Workers’ Compensation claims with an option thereafter to extend the agreement for 1 year increments up to 3 years. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 621015233 Cover Memo Item # 26 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 26 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 3 Item # 26 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 3 Item # 26 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 3 Item # 26 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Abandonment of a Portion of Fairhope Street Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Motion to determine that a portion of Fairhope Street, as shown on the attached plat (shown as Parcel "B") and consisting of 1.63 acres (71,042 square feet), has ceased to be used by the public to the extent that no substantial public purpose is served by it or that its removal from the county road system is otherwise in the best public interest, and a public hearing shall be held regarding the issue of abandonment pursuant to O.C.G.A. Sections 32-7-2 and 8-3-153. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 27 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 27 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 27 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Approve construction contract award in the amount of $238,987.41 to L-J,Inc. for the 1200 Block of Broad Street Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drain Separation Project . Bid item #10-140. Department:Utilities Caption:Motion to approve construction contract award to L-J, Inc. in the amount of $238,987.41. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:This project is located on the 1200 block of Broad Street, Augusta GA. The existing combined 12-inch concrete sewer will be removed and a new sanitary sewer line will be installed along with a new storm sewer line. The proposed sanitary sewer line will begin just below 13th Street on the south side of Broad Street and connect to the existing sanitary sewer at the intersection of 12th Street. The proposed storm sewer will begin just above 12th Street on the south side of Broad Street and connect to the existing storm sewer at the intersection of 13th Street. The proposed sanitary and storm sewer lines will separate the combined system and solve the problem of the deteriorating line. This sanitary sewer line will consist of approximately 740 LF of 8-inch SDR 35 PVC pipe, three 48-inch diameter manhole structures and one tie-in to the existing sanitary sewer. The storm sewer line will consist of approximately 33 LF of 12-inch ductile iron pipe, 841 LF of 15-inch reinforced concrete pipe, four 48-inch diameter manhole structures and one doghouse connector manhole. Analysis:L-J,Inc. submitted an acceptable bid package and was the lowest responsive bidder. The staff of the Utilities Department has completed evaluation of the bid package and it is recommended that the award go to L-J, Inc. for $238,987.41 Financial Impact:The amount submitted for the construction of this project was $238,987.41.These funds are available from account 507043420-5425210 / 81000025-5425210 for $120,229.81 of the amount and 323-041110- 296823333 for $118,757.60 of the amount. Alternatives:Award the contract to L-J, Inc. Recommendation:It is recommended to award the contract to L-J, Inc. in the amount of $238,987.41. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: $120,229.81 from the account 507043420-5425210 / 81000025-5425210, $118,757.60 from the account 323-041110-296823333 Cover Memo Item # 28 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 28 BI D I T E M # 1 0 - 1 4 0 12 0 0 B l o c k o f B r o a d S t r e e t S a n i t a r y S e w e r a n d St o r m D r a i n S e p a r a t i o n P r o j e c t Bi d O p e n i n g We d n e s d a y , J u l y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 , 3 : 0 0 P M It e m D e s c r i p t i o n Es t i m a t e d Qu a n t i t y Un i t s Un i t P r i c e T o t a l P r i c e A U D C o s t A E D C o s t Ne w 1 " S h o r t S i d e W a t e r S e r v i c e , I n s t a l l e d i n c l u d i n g r e - co n n e c t i o n , C o m p l e t e 17 E A 67 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 $ 11 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 $ - $ 8" D i a . P V C , S a n S e w e r P i p e S D R 3 5 , d e p t h 0 - 6 ' , I n c . T y p e II ( N o . 6 7 S t o n e ) b e d d i n g m a t e r i a l 74 0 L F 2 4 . 5 3 $ 1 8 , 1 5 2 . 2 0 $ 18 , 1 5 2 . 2 0 $ - $ Se l e c t B a c k f i l l , G D O T T y p e I , C l a s s I & I I ( s a n d / c l a y ) , me a s u r e d i n - p l a c e v o l u m e 35 0 C Y 3 1 . 5 0 $ 1 1 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 $ 11 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 $ - $ Pr e - C a s t S a n S e w e r M a n h o l e , G D O T S t d 1 0 1 1 A , T y p e I , de p t h 0 - 6 ' , ( 4 8 " d i a . ) 3 E A 1 , 8 5 6 . 2 5 $ 5 , 5 6 8 . 7 5 $ 5, 5 6 8 . 7 5 $ - $ 6" S a n i t a r y S e w e r S e r v i c e , C o m p l e t e 17 E A 5 9 0 . 6 3 $ 1 0 , 0 4 0 . 7 1 $ 10 , 0 4 0 . 7 1 $ - $ Ti e N e w S a n S e w e r t o E x i s t i n g M a n h o l e s , D i a m e t e r V a r i e s 1 E A 1 , 6 8 7 . 5 0 $ 1 , 6 8 7 . 5 0 $ 1, 6 8 7 . 5 0 $ - $ 12 " D i a . , D I P , S t o r m S e w e r P i p e , d e p t h 0 - 6 ' 33 L F 4 8 . 1 5 $ 1 , 5 8 8 . 9 5 $ - $ 1, 5 8 8 . 9 5 $ 15 " D i a . , R C P , S t o r m S e w e r P i p e , d e p t h 0 - 6 ' 23 2 L F 2 5 . 6 5 $ 5 , 9 5 0 . 8 0 $ - $ 5, 9 5 0 . 8 0 $ 15 " D i a . , R C P , S t o r m S e w e r P i p e , d e p t h 6 - 8 ' 67 L F 2 7 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 9 . 0 0 $ - $ 1, 8 0 9 . 0 0 $ 15 " D i a . , R C P , S t o r m S e w e r P i p e , d e p t h 8 - 1 0 ' 30 2 L F 2 7 . 0 0 $ 8 , 1 5 4 . 0 0 $ - $ 8, 1 5 4 . 0 0 $ 15 " D i a . , R C P , S t o r m S e w e r P i p e , d e p t h 1 0 - 1 2 ' 24 0 L F 3 9 . 3 8 $ 9 , 4 5 1 . 2 0 $ - $ 9, 4 5 1 . 2 0 $ Se l e c t B a c k f i l l , G D O T T y p e I , C l a s s I & I I ( s a n d / c l a y ) , me a s u r e d i n - p l a c e v o l u m e 60 0 C Y 3 0 . 3 8 $ 1 8 , 2 2 8 . 0 0 $ - $ 1 8 , 2 2 8 . 0 0 $ Pr e - C a s t S t o r m M a n h o l e , G D O T S t d 1 0 1 1 A , T y p e I , d e p t h 0- 6 ' , ( 4 8 " d i a . ) 1 E A 2 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 $ - $ 2 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 $ Pr e - C a s t S t o r m M a n h o l e , G D O T S t d 1 0 1 1 A , T y p e I , d e p t h 6- 8 ' , ( 4 8 " d i a . ) 2 E A 2 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 $ - $ 4 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 $ Pr e - C a s t S t o r m M a n h o l e , G D O T S t d 1 0 1 1 A , T y p e I , d e p t h 8- 1 0 ' , ( 4 8 " d i a . ) 1 E A 2 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ - $ 2 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ Do g h o u s e / C o n n e c t o r S t o r m M a n h o l e , i n c l u d i n g b a s e , co n e , r i n g a n d c o v e r 1 E A 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ - $ 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ As p h a l t O v e r l a y , T y p e F , 1 . 5 " T h i c k , M i n i m u m 45 7 0 S Y 1 0 . 2 4 $ 4 6 , 7 9 6 . 8 0 $ 23 , 3 9 8 . 4 0 $ 23 , 3 9 8 . 4 0 $ GA B , 1 0 . 5 " t h i c k , 7 ' w i d e a n d 2 . 5 " t h i c k a s p h a l t p a t c h , in c l u d i n g r e m o v a l o f 2 . 5 " G A B a n d p l a c e m e n t o f bi t u m i n o u s t a c k c o a t 12 5 5 S Y 2 7 . 9 0 $ 3 5 , 0 1 4 . 5 0 $ 17 , 5 0 7 . 2 5 $ 1 7 , 5 0 7 . 2 5 $ Re c y c l e d A s p h a l t C o n c r e t e L e v e l i n g , I n c l u d i n g B i t u m i n o u s Ma t e r i a l 10 0 T O N 1 1 2 . 5 0 $ 1 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5, 6 2 5 . 0 0 $ 5 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 $ Lu m p S u m 1 L S 3 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 15 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 15 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ Co n t r a c t T o t a l = 23 8 , 9 8 7 . 4 1 $ 12 0 , 2 2 9 . 8 1 $ 11 8 , 7 5 7 . 6 0 $ L- J , I n c . Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 28 Item # 28 Invitation To Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until 3:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 28, 2010 for furnishing: Bid Item #10-140 Broad Street Sanitary Sewer Install for Utilities Department Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 706-821-2422 Bid documents may be examined at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Plans and specifications for the project shall be obtained by all prime, subcontractors and suppliers exclusively from Digital Blue Print. The fees for the plans and specifications which are non-refundable is $100.00 Documents may also be examined during regular business hours at the F. W. Dodge Plan Room, 1281 Broad Street, Augusta, GA 30901. It is the wish of the Owner that all businesses are given the opportunity to submit on this project. To facilitate this policy the Owner is providing the opportunity to view plans online (www.digblueprint.com) at no charge through Digital Blue Print (706 821-0405) beginning Thursday, June 17, 2010. Bidders are cautioned that submitting a package without Procurement of a complete set are likely to overlook issues of construction phasing, delivery of goods or services, or coordination with other work that is material to the successful completion of the project. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of documents through any other source is not advisable. Acquisition of documents from unauthorized sources places the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. A Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference will be held on Friday, July 9, 2010 @ 10:00 a.m. in the Procurement Department – Room 605. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. All questions are to be submitted in writing by Tuesday, July 13, 2010 by 5:00 p.m. No Bid may be withdrawn for a period of 60 days after time has been called on the date of opening. A 10% Bid bond is required to be submitted along with the bidders’ qualifications; a 100% performance bond and a 100% payment bond will be required for award. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia does not operate a DBE, MBE or WBE Program but rather pursuant to its code of ordinances, this local government operates instead a Local Small Business Opportunity Program. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle June 17, 24, July 1, 8, 2010 Metro Courier June 23, 2010 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Tom Wiedimer Utilities Department Jerry Delaughter Utilities Department Jody Crabtree Utilities Department Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 1 Item # 28 Ve n d o r s : Ma b u s B r o t h e r s 92 0 M o l l y P o n d R d Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 1 Re e v e s C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 A P A C I n d u s t r i a l D r Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 7 Ha r r i s T r u c k i n g 17 3 6 B a r t o n C h a p e l R d Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 6 Bl a i r C o n s t r u c t i o n P. O . B o x 7 7 0 Ev a n s , G A 3 0 8 0 9 Ga r n t o & G e a r i g B r o s 67 1 P o n d e r P l a c e D r Ev a n s , G A 3 0 8 0 9 At t a c h m e n t B Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Bi d B o n d Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Ad d e n d u m 1 Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Bi d A m o u n t $2 9 0 , 4 5 2 . 7 4 $ 3 6 8 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 5 , 8 4 8 . 4 3 $ 5 1 9 , 2 9 0 . 0 0 Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 4 0 Br o a d S t r e e t S a n i t a r y S e w e r I n s t a l l Fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : W e d n e s d a y , J u l y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 a t 3 : 0 0 p . m . Pa g e 1 o f 2 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 2 Item # 28 Ve n d o r s : To d d S m i t h G r a d i n g 18 1 0 K e l l y m i l l R d Cu m m i n g , G A 3 0 0 4 0 Ea g l e U t i l i t y 13 5 0 B r a n c h R d Bi s h o p , G A 3 0 6 2 7 Be a m ' s C o n t r a c t i n g 23 3 5 A t o m i c R d Be e c h I s l a n d , S C 2 9 8 4 2 DS U t i l i t i e s 16 4 4 H o l y T r i n i t y Ch u r c h R d Li t t l e M o u n t a i n , S C 29 0 7 5 L- J , I n c 22 0 S t o n e r i d g e D r , Su i t e 4 0 5 Co l u m b i a , S C 2 9 2 1 0 At t a c h m e n t B Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Bi d B o n d Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Ad d e n d u m 1 Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Bi d A m o u n t $2 3 9 , 1 4 4 . 4 5 $ 2 8 7 , 4 7 4 . 5 7 $ 3 5 7 , 2 5 9 . 0 0 $ 2 3 8 , 9 7 5 . 9 9 Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 4 0 Br o a d S t r e e t S a n i t a r y S e w e r I n s t a l l Fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : W e d n e s d a y , J u l y 2 8 , 2 0 1 0 a t 3 : 0 0 p . m . Pa g e 2 o f 2 Attachment number 4 Page 2 of 2 Item # 28 Attachment number 5 Page 1 of 2 Item # 28 Attachment number 5 Page 2 of 2 Item # 28 Attachment number 6 Page 1 of 2 Item # 28 Attachment number 6 Page 2 of 2 Item # 28 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Approve Judicial Center FF&E Department:Public Services Department - Facilities Management Division Caption:Motion to approve the award of a contract in the amount of $1,602,193.46 to Weinberger, and in the amount of $110,666.20 to Modern Business for Bid item #10-084A; Furniture for the new ARC Judicial Center. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:Bids were solicited and received from two (2) firms and each proposal was deemed to be compliant with the bid specifications. Heery analyzed the proposals submitted and contacted the low bidders, Weinberger and Modern Business and verified that their proposal was based on the scope of work indicated in the bid documents. This was confirmed by the Renee Severson from RJS Designs. There were different sections provided in the bid form and the intent was to award each section separately. Bidders were invited to bid on any or all sections. Since the bids came in under budget, the bids for the alternate workstations were considered instead of the base bid workstations. The specified alternate submitted by Weinberger was chosen as the preferred system by the courts. Heery and RJS Designs analyzed the proposals submitted and recommend that the bid packages should be awarded as follows: Section Award to Amount 1 Weinberger $1,179,066.46 1A - (Items A, B, C, D, F, G, H and I) Modern Business $20,816.20 1A - (Items E and J) Weinberger $1,582.32 2A Weinberger $419,923.58 3 Modern Business $89,850.00 4 Weinberger $1,621.10 Subtotal Weinberger $1,602,193.46 Modern Business $110,666.20 Total Award $1.712.859.66 Analysis:The Furniture is required in the Judicial Center to provide furniture and workstations throughout the new facility. There are several pieces of furniture from the existing courts facilities that will refurbished and/or relocated to the new facility. Financial Impact:The low bidders' proposal is lower than the budget that was setup for this scope of work on the Judicial Center. The total cost of the Furniture bid is $1,602,193.46 to Weinberger, and $110,666.20 to Modern Business, for a total cost of $1,712,859.66. Alternatives:1. Accept the low bidder proposals for $1,602,193.46 from Weinberger, and $110,666.20 from Modern Business, for a total cost of $1,712,859.66 for bid item #10-084A to allow this phase of the work to proceed and maintain the schedule for timely completion of the Judicial Center. 2. Reject the submitted low bids and rebid the package again. Cover Memo Item # 29 Recommendation:Approve the award of a contract in the amount of $1,602,193.46 to Weinberger, and in the amount of $110,666.20 to Modern Business for Bid item #10-084A; Furniture for the new ARC Judicial Center. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN ACCOUNT: GL –325-05-1120; JL – 209251104 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 29 ARC Judicial Center Furniture, Furnishing and Equipment Bid Tabulation Summary Weinberger Modern Business Apparent Low Bid Amount Apparent Low Bidder Apparent Low Bid Amount Apparent Low Bidder Weinberger Modern Business Section #1 1,179,066.46$ 1,189,731.77$ 1,179,066.46$ Weinberger 1,179,066.46$ Weinberger 1,179,066.46$ Section #1A 20,816.20$ 20,816.20$ Modern Business 20,816.20$ Modern Business 20,816.20$ 1,582.32$ 1,582.32$ Weinberger 1,582.32$ Weinberger 1,582.32$ Section #2 382,356.00$ 361,751.50$ 361,751.50$ Modern Business Section #2A 419,923.58$ Not Approved 419,923.58$ Weinberger 419,923.58$ Section #3 No Bid 89,850.00$ 89,850.00$ Modern Business 89,850.00$ Modern Business 89,850.00$ Section #4 1,621.10$ 2,978.20$ 1,621.10$ Weinberger 1,621.10$ Weinberger 1,621.10$ 1,654,687.58$ 1,712,859.66$ 1,602,193.46$ 110,666.20$ Section 2 & 2A pricing based on quantities on spreadsheet Bid Summary W/O Alternate With Alternate Recommendation for Award 8/25/2010 2:57 PMItem # 29 Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES $1,659,200.95 $2,000,928.30 $1,204,621.25 $1,197,027.74 $361,751.50 $382,356.00 $399,900.00 $419,923.58 $89,850.00 No Bid $2,978.20 $1,621.10 B-1 Long wd bench $1,068.27 $1,076.33 B-2 Short wd bench No Bid No Bid B-3 Locker room bench $207.48 $295.67 BF-1 Buffet - 4 door $1,585.31 $1,549.60 BF-1A Buffet-locking, plinth base, 72 x 24 $1,876.61 $2,007.30 BK-1 Bookcase- 4 shelves $2,328.48 $2,328.48 BK-2 Bookcase- 3 shelves $402.19 $521.94 BK-3 Bookcase- 4 shelves $740.55 $1,635.98 BK-4 Bookcase-2 shelf child's $378.00 $444.15 BK-5 Bookcase-1 starter; 5 add-ons; $8,724.19 $8,724.19 BK-6 Bookcase-1 starter; 4 add-ons $7,302.64 $7,302.64 BK-7 Bookcase-1 starter; 2 add-ons $4,459.54 $4,459.54 CD-1 Cash drawer $204.83 $219.93 CD-2 Replacement cash tray $49.33 $61.55 CH-1(A) Task chair with synchro-tilt $381.37 $295.25 CH-1(B) Task chair with synchro-tilt $381.37 $324.69 CH-1(C) Task chair with synchro-tilt $381.37 $324.69 CH-1(D) Task chair with synchro-tilt $381.37 $324.69 CH-1(E) Task chair with synchro-tilt $381.37 $324.69 CH-1(F) Task chair with synchro-tilt $441.96 $372.81 CH-1(G) Task chair with synchro-tilt $407.40 $346.06 CH-1(H) Task chair with synchro-tilt $381.37 $375.97 CH-2(A) Task chair-high back, loop arms $636.42 $361.76 CH-2(B) Task chair-high back, loop arms $658.72 $363.69 CH-2A Task chair-high back, adj. arms $653.92 $274.92 CH-3(A) Task chair-mid back, loop arms $403.81 $323.09 CH-3(B) Task chair-mid back, loop arms $426.49 $344.64 CH-3(C) Task chair-mid back, loop arms $457.49 $403.26 CH-3(D) Task chair-mid back, loop arms $482.22 $410.69 CH-4 See below Bid Section 1- General Furnishings Section 2 - Panel Systems Workstations Section 2A - Panel System Workstations Alternate Section 3 - Specialty Storage Section 4 - Miscellaneous Furnishings Vendors Addendum Bid Bond Total Lump Sum Base Price Section 1 - General Furnishings Attachment B Bidder's Form Page 1 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 9 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 Vendors CH-5 Wooden Court Task chair $398.09 $406.15 CH-6 Wooden Court Jury Chair $472.78 $480.84 CH-7 Wooden Court Side Chair $343.92 $351.98 CH-8(A) Plastic Guest Chair No Bid No Bid CH-8(B) Plastic Guest Chair $247.43 $214.92 CH-8(C) Plastic Guest Chair $238.46 $238.42 CH-9(A) Executive Guest Chair $580.28 $675.74 CH-9(B) Executive Guest Chair $535.84 $626.20 CH-9(C) Executive Guest Chair $595.94 $692.42 CH-9(D) Executive Guest Chair $508.46 $597.67 CH-9(E) Executive Guest Chair $516.67 $565.74 CH-9(F) Executive Guest Chair $521.26 $611.42 CH-9(G) Executive Guest Chair $592.70 $688.97 CH-9(H) Executive Guest Chair $577.58 $671.82 CH-9(I) Executive Guest Chair $508.46 $601.34 CH-9(J) Executive Guest Chair $516.67 $568.85 CH-9(K) Executive Guest Chair $607.82 $703.77 CH-9(L) Executive Guest Chair $580.28 $672.47 CH-10(A) Jury Assembly Chair w/arms $171.82 $187.40 CH-10(B) Jury Assembly Chair w/arms $189.50 $199.05 CH-10(C) Jury Assembly Chair w/arms $209.83 $214.17 CH-10A(A) Jury Assembly Chair, armless $155.93 $169.74 CH-10A(B) Jury Assembly Chair, armless $144.74 $159.14 CH-10A(C) Jury Assembly Chair, armless $149.44 $168.18 CH-11 Breakroom Chair-armless $54.17 $54.43 CH-12(A) Executive Side Chair $544.75 $637.37 CH-12(B) Executive Side Chair $505.71 $581.26 CH-12(C) Executive Side Chair $537.73 $936.29 CH-13(A) Accent side chair $593.19 $778.85 CH-13(B) Accent side chair $608.85 $769.80 CH-13(C) Accent side chair $616.41 $751.91 CH-13(D) Accent side chair $642.33 $776.50 CH-13(E) Accent side chair $618.57 $756.70 CH-13(F) Accent side chair $631.48 $767.86 CH-14(A) Stool $305.23 $448.14 CH-14(B) Stool $305.23 $448.14 CH-14(C) Stool $305.23 $448.14 CH-15 Bailiff Chair $139.13 $147.19 CH-16 Interview Chair $148.64 $188.13 CH-16A Interview Chair - armless $86.40 $114.61 CH-17(A) Private Office Guest Chair $291.51 $356.48 CH-17(B) Private Office Guest Chair $291.51 $380.09 CH-17(C) Private Office Guest Chair $296.06 $402.52 Page 2 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 2 of 9 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 Vendors CH-18 Basic armless task chair $181.44 $164.16 CH-19 Wood Jury Deliberation chairs on casters $342.68 $350.74 CH-20(A) Executive Conference Chair $719.28 $719.28 CH-20(B) Executive Conference Chair $805.68 $805.68 CH-21 Executive Side Chair $555.12 $555.12 CHC-1 Child's Chair-armless wood $68.13 $76.19 CHT-1 Child's Table- 20"h $157.18 $165.24 CR-1 Exec. Credenza 72"w kneespace $2,090.45 $2,090.45 CR-2 Private Office Credenza-72" ; kneespace $883.04 $853.34 CT-1 Computer Table-36"w $824.26 $824.26 D-1 Exec. Desk 72"w, arc top $2,623.97 $2,623.97 D-2 Exec. Desk 72"w $2,566.94 $2,566.94 D-3 P.O. Desk with return- 66"w $1,419.74 $1,378.66 D-4 66"w x 30"d; 48" x 24"d $1,419.74 $1,378.66 D-5 P.O. Desk with return- 66"w $1,815.66 $1,920.20 D-6 U-shaped desk $4,072.89 $4,072.90 D-7 U-shaped desk $4,072.89 $4,072.90 D-8 U-shaped desk w/ transaction counter $4,516.99 $4,516.99 D-9 U-shaped desk w/ transaction counter $4,516.99 $4,516.99 D-10 Exec. Desk- 60"w. x 30"d $2,153.52 $2,153.52 D-11 Exec. Desk-L-shaped 72" $3,254.69 $3,254.69 D-12 Exec. Desk-U-shaped w/computer $4,752.42 $4,752.43 D-13 Exec. Desk-U-shaped $4,492.36 $4,492.37 D-14 P.O. Desk- 72"w x 36"d $936.91 $994.55 EP-1 End Panels-Double Wide $857.98 $775.61 EP-2 End Panels-Single Wide $663.13 $883.61 F-1 Exec. 4-drawer Lateral file $1,705.10 $1,705.10 F-2 P.O. 2-drwr Lateral file $563.80 $592.21 F-3 P.O. 4 drwr -36"w $975.57 $972.60 F-4 File- 4 drwr -30"w; metal $361.98 $369.79 F-5 File- 5 drwr - 30"w; metal $428.66 $467.77 F-5A File-5 drwr - 30"w; metal $501.05 $526.97 F-6 File-2 drwr - 30"w; metal $252.84 $222.83 F-7 P.O.-2 drwr lateral with cabinet above & tackboard $1,641.51 $1,227.99 F-8 Exec. 2 drwr 30"w lateral with cabinet above $2,128.04 $2,128.03 F-9 Exec. Two Drawer Lateral $1,159.49 $1,159.49 F-10 5 drwr flat file $879.98 $717.06 GS-1(A) Single chair, open arm $628.56 $412.82 GS-1(B) Single chair, open arm $616.68 $388.54 GS-2(A) Two Seat, open arm $1,051.06 $694.88 GS-2(B) Two Seat, open arm $1,019.47 $622.03 GS-2A(A) Two bariatric seats, open arm $920.81 $552.92 Page 3 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 3 of 9 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 Vendors GS-2A(B) Two bariatric seats, open arm $889.22 $493.14 GS-2A(C) Two bariatric seats, open arm $958.43 $573.47 GS-3 Three Seat, open arm; table $1,516.16 $1,178.69 KB-1 Articulating Keyboard $218.70 $132.36 L-1 Lockers-Single point II Athletic $224.67 $298.79 LC-1 Lounge chair with wood cap arms $1,328.52 $683.68 LC-2(A) Executive Lounge Chair $698.69 $812.50 LC-2(B) Executive Lounge Chair $954.40 $1,059.78 LC-2(C) Executive Lounge Chair $853.42 $1,686.70 LC-2(D) Executive Lounge Chair $806.98 $930.51 LC-2(E) Executive Lounge Chair $752.15 $869.86 LC-2(F) Executive Lounge Chair $617.31 $722.75 LS-1(A) Executive Love seat $1,044.14 $1,200.98 LS-1(B) Executive Love seat $1,045.22 $1,202.72 LS-1(C) Executive Love seat $820.45 $966.41 LS-1(D) Executive Love seat $987.55 $1,138.14 LS-1(E) Executive Love seat $1,087.34 $1,250.32 LS-1(F) Executive Love seat $914.54 $1,173.19 LS-1(G) Executive Love seat $1,041.98 $1,199.46 M-1 Mailroom console w/ sorter above $2,417.90 $1,989.29 M-2 Mailroom Corner platform w/ sorter above $967.25 $795.79 M-3 Mailroom console w/ sorter above $2,044.66 $1,589.73 M-4 Sorter w/Pockets above; shelves below $1,213.06 $997.97 M-5 Sorter- All pockets $1,241.57 $1,021.26 M-6 Sorter w/Pockets above; shelf below $1,098.14 $903.35 M-7 Mailroom Desk 72" w/ ped.$1,136.16 $934.77 MB-1 Library mtl bookshelves 27 lf. A 10" d.$2,338.20 $3,145.45 MS-1 Metal Shelves 36"w x 12"d $115.51 $122.45 MS-1A Metal Shelves 36"w x 12"d $143.13 $150.58 MS-2 Open Metal Shelves -18"d $103.45 $110.17 MS-3 Open Metal Shelves -24"d $118.52 $125.51 MS-4 Open Mtl. Shelves -48"w.24"d $140.12 $147.51 MS-5 Open Mtl Shelves 60”w x 30”d x 84”h $280.75 $205.19 MS-6 Open Mtl Shelves 60”w x 48”d x 84”h $410.77 $260.94 OT-1 Occassional Table-18"w x 28"d x 23"h $348.62 $348.62 OT-2 Occassional Table- 22"w x 22"d x 23"h $359.42 $359.42 OT-3 Occassional Table- 22" diam.$452.95 $474.60 OT-4 24"h round accent table $204.12 $219.40 OT-5 Occassional Table- Console $602.64 $737.80 OT-6 Occassional Table $542.59 $542.59 PB-1 P.O. Present. Board 48" x 48"$981.19 $1,094.21 PB-1A Presentation Board 48" x 48"$1,027.75 $1,569.66 PB-2 Exec. Present. Board 48" x 48"$1,464.48 $1,464.48 PB-3 Presentation Board 96" x 48"$1,879.20 $2,137.42 Page 4 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 4 of 9 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 Vendors PD-1 Pedestal- B/B/File $177.18 $180.53 PS-1 Printer Stand 30”w x 20”d x 28.5”h $315.90 $391.31 T-1 42" diam.Table $957.74 $957.74 T-2 42" diam rd table $729.04 $675.31 T-3 Table 14' x 4' rect. Lam top; panel legs $2,060.55 $2,221.19 T-4 Table 12' x 5' lam top, panel legs, trad, wd edge. $3,166.02 $3,475.87 T-5 30" x 6' Attny table with p/d $2,435.67 $2,071.61 T-6 3' x 6' Attny table with p/d $2,524.72 $2,503.61 T-7 Table 36” x 72”$358.02 $380.51 T-8(A) Table 3' square $268.97 $290.38 T-8(B) Table 3' square $288.25 $277.06 T-9 Table 3' x 2'$246.03 $279.95 T-10 Table 120" x 48"laminate - panel bas; self edge; power $1,995.93 $2,071.79 T-11 Table 76" x 36"; panel base; self edge $1,093.08 $1,152.22 T-12 Table 168" x 60"; panel base; self edge $3,305.13 $3,405.24 T-13 Table Custom 96" x 42"$1,212.82 $1,274.18 T-14 Table 42" diam $688.19 $739.83 T-15 panel base; Bevel wood edge; power $2,913.65 $3,006.50 T-16 Table 72" x 36" rectangular $319.29 $327.35 T-17 Table 84" x 30" rectangular No Bid No Bid T-18 Table 60"diameter $917.85 $973.75 T-19 Table No Bid No Bid T-20 Table 60" x 30"$245.42 $253.48 T-21 Table 60" x 36"$271.68 $279.74 T-22 Table 24" x 42"No Bid No Bid T-23 Table, 168" x 48" + electrical $7,675.77 $4,352.83 T-24 Table 192" X 72" + electrical $11,965.69 $8,625.74 T-25 Table 168" x 48"laminate - panel base; bevel wood edge; power $3,792.43 $3,901.56 T-26 24" x 42" Bailiff Table $2,264.91 $1,855.61 WB-1 Work Bench $462.14 $612.22 WR-1 Waste Recept.; 28 gal., perforated $1,044.36 $1,249.72 WR-2 Waste Recept., 28" h. stl. trash $514.62 $578.72 WR-3 Waste Recept., 35 gal. cap.$507.60 $614.47 Included $40,000.00 $47,807.40 $251,779.45 $255,538.52 CH-4(A) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $790.50 $817.77 CH-4(B) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $796.80 $845.81 CH-4(C) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $916.80 $957.45 CH-4(D) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $768.80 $850.00 Installation TOTAL FOR GENERAL FURNISHINGS ABOVE Bid Section 1A- To be awarded Individually (28 TOTAL) General Crating/Freight Charges (indicate line item costs in Notes ) Page 5 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 5 of 9 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 Vendors CH-4(E) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $845.28 $788.58 CH-4(F) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $874.50 $1,153.90 CH-4(G) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $847.50 $889.35 CH-4(H) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $847.50 $889.35 CH-4(I) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $766.50 $824.67 CH-4(J) Exec. Desk Chair-option 1 $845.28 $793.74 CH-4(A) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $797.04 No Bid CH-4(B) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $802.08 No Bid CH-4(C) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $898.08 No Bid CH-4(D) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $802.80 No Bid CH-4(E) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $755.08 No Bid CH-4(F) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $864.24 No Bid CH-4(G) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $842.64 No Bid CH-4(H) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $842.64 No Bid CH-4(I) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $777.84 No Bid CH-4(J) Exec. Desk Chair-option 2 $755.28 No Bid CH-4(A) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $920.43 No Bid CH-4(B) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $942.90 No Bid CH-4(C) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $1,062.90 No Bid CH-4(D) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $926.10 No Bid CH-4(E) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $873.45 No Bid CH-4(F)Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $1,020.60 No Bid CH-4(G) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $993.60 No Bid CH-4(H) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $993.60 No Bid CH-4(I) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $912.60 No Bid CH-4(J) Exec. Desk Chair-option 3 $884.40 No Bid WS-1 Workstation $2,640.10 $2,881.98 WS-1A Workstation $2,717.35 $2,290.07 WS-1B Workstation $2,555.17 $3,191.97 WS-1C Workstation $2,824.28 $2,413.06 WS-2 Workstation $2,245.66 $2,588.13 WS-2A Workstation $2,650.50 $2,486.64 WS-3 Workstation $2,539.59 $2,689.22 WS-3A Workstation $1,955.26 $2,443.80 WS-3B Workstation $2,044.27 $2,148.99 WS-3C Workstation $1,916.18 $2,594.27 WS-3D Workstation $1,722.91 $2,224.81 WS-3E Workstation $2,636.69 $3,011.11 WS-4 Workstation $1,927.43 $2,018.89 WS-4A Workstation $1,535.78 $1,626.40 WS-4B Workstation $1,535.78 $2,081.34 WS-5 Workstation $2,103.27 $3,028.47 WS-6 Workstation $1,387.64 $769.39 Bid Section 2-Panel Systems Workstations Page 6 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 6 of 9 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 Vendors WS-6A Workstation $1,045.50 $1,000.45 WS-6A Workstation-modified $1,045.50 $898.00 WS-6B Workstation $795.66 $402.17 WS-6C Workstation $554.02 $358.91 WS-6D Workstation $649.00 $751.42 WS-6E Workstation $628.85 $484.00 WS-6F Workstation $1,033.38 $740.27 WS-6G Workstation $819.72 $1,020.37 WS-6H Workstation $1,145.90 $1,036.02 WS-7 Workstation $1,143.06 $866.70 WS-8 Workstation $1,049.96 $1,747.37 WS-9 Workstation $1,166.76 $1,107.95 WS-9A Workstation $1,189.22 $1,110.73 WS-10 Workstation $1,209.18 $1,894.68 WS-11 Workstation $913.47 $825.14 WS-11A Workstation $977.70 $838.38 WS-12 Workstation $251.97 $324.51 WS-13 Workstation $1,752.63 $2,543.06 WS-13A Workstation $2,643.72 $3,385.20 WS-13B Workstation $2,208.84 $3,229.79 WS-13C Workstation $1,952.12 $2,361.12 WS-14 Workstation $476.78 $557.81 WS-15 Workstation $411.64 $1,381.42 WS-16 Workstation $1,781.47 $2,536.94 WS-16A Workstation $1,451.78 $1,947.69 WS-16B Workstation $451.76 $947.35 WS-16C Workstation $1,661.90 $1,217.67 WS-17 Workstation $1,902.31 $2,749.14 WS-17A Workstation $1,401.63 $1,509.78 WS-17B Workstation $1,167.40 $1,609.12 WS-18 Workstation $1,936.01 $2,341.41 WS-19 Workstation $740.32 $2,063.37 WS-20 Workstation $2,473.39 $2,742.75 WS-21 Workstation $2,289.06 $2,341.51 WS-21A Workstation $2,056.29 $2,343.07 WS-21B Workstation $3,666.81 $2,486.91 WS-22 Workstation $1,898.51 $2,932.99 WS-22A Workstation $2,772.24 $2,509.76 WS-22B Workstation $2,138.35 $2,535.15 N/A N/A $29,000.00 $36,994.60 $120,791.67 $149,973.84 TOTAL FOR PANEL SYSTEMS WORKSTATIONS ABOVE General Crating/Freight Charges (indicate line item costs in Notes ) Installation Page 7 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 7 of 9 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 Vendors WS-1 Workstation $2,802.85 $3,427.52 WS-1A Workstation $3,261.09 $3,385.08 WS-1B Workstation $3,261.09 $4,187.24 WS-1C Workstation $3,261.09 $3,692.75 WS-2 Workstation $2,935.11 $2,420.03 WS-2A Workstation $2,711.31 $2,557.88 WS-3 Workstation $3,600.64 $2,658.82 WS-3A Workstation $2,895.59 $3,343.54 WS-3B Workstation $2,174.78 $3,082.78 WS-3C Workstation $3,747.74 $3,401.72 WS-3D Workstation $3,600.64 $3,287.40 WS-3E Workstation $3,747.74 $4,041.99 WS-4 Workstation $2,572.13 $2,839.31 WS-4A Workstation $2,572.13 $2,936.36 WS-4B Workstation $2,572.13 $3,027.56 WS-5 Workstation $4,302.20 $2,957.36 WS-6 Workstation $2,695.24 $755.89 WS-6A Workstation $971.18 $982.90 WS-6A Workstation-modified $971.18 $882.25 WS-6B Workstation $1,708.00 $395.11 WS-6C Workstation $2,582.60 $352.61 WS-6D Workstation $2,171.77 $738.24 WS-6E Workstation $2,711.29 $475.51 WS-6F Workstation $3,261.08 $727.28 WS-6G Workstation $3,025.11 $1,002.47 WS-6H Workstation $2,473.18 $1,017.84 WS-7 Workstation $3,025.10 $851.49 WS-8 Workstation $1,874.13 $1,716.71 WS-9 Workstation $1,478.15 $1,088.52 WS-9A Workstation $2,637.21 $1,091.24 WS-10 Workstation $2,179.59 $1,861.44 WS-11 Workstation $1,387.88 $810.67 WS-11A Workstation $2,037.30 $823.67 WS-12 Workstation $5,919.03 $318.82 WS-13 Workstation $3,035.61 $2,375.50 WS-13A Workstation $4,135.30 $3,823.74 WS-13B Workstation $3,322.07 $6,796.99 WS-13C Workstation $3,322.07 $1,535.64 WS-14 Workstation $830.61 $548.03 WS-15 Workstation $2,173.60 $1,357.18 WS-16 Workstation $3,260.28 $2,492.44 WS-16A Workstation $2,477.14 $1,913.52 WS-16B Workstation $1,180.06 $930.73 WS-16C Workstation $1,275.41 $1,196.31 Bid Section 2A-Panel Systems Workstations- Alternate (optional-not required) Page 8 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 8 of 9 Item # 29 Re-Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment for Judicial Center for the City of Augusta - Public Services Department Re-Bid Due: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 @11:00 a.m. Modern Business 1445 Greene Street Augusta, GA 30901 Weinbergers Business 3137 Washington Road Augusta, GA 30907 Vendors WS-17 Workstation $2,666.06 $2,758.37 WS-17A Workstation $2,072.91 $1,483.29 WS-17B Workstation $2,072.91 $1,580.89 WS-18 Workstation $2,854.73 $2,403.80 WS-19 Workstation $2,417.76 $2,027.17 WS-20 Workstation $3,025.11 $3,388.92 WS-21 Workstation $1,057.29 $2,460.25 WS-21A Workstation $1,057.29 $2,290.38 WS-21B Workstation $1,043.20 $2,377.42 WS-22 Workstation $2,552.74 $3,703.54 WS-22A Workstation $2,199.62 $2,465.72 WS-22B Workstation $2,422.25 $2,910.75 $30,560.12 $41,638.00 $174,141.42 $161,598.58 HDMF-1 High Density Mobile Files $16,025.00 No Bid HDMF-2 High Density Mobile Files $23,525.00 No Bid RS-1 Roller Shelving-8 units $5,100.00 No Bid RS-2 Roller Shelving-9 units $5,700.00 No Bid RS-3 Roller Shelving-5 units $3,200.00 No Bid RS-4 Roller Shelf Desk-4 tier $4,100.00 No Bid RS-5 Roller Shelf Desk-8 tier $6,800.00 No Bid N/A N/A $64,450.00 No Bid CP-1 Crowd Control Post $333.60 $91.64 R-1 Electrostatic paint $643.00 $979.62 N/A Included N/A Included $976.60 $1,071.26 Bid Section 3-Specialty Storage TOTAL FOR PANEL SYSTEMS WORKSTATION ALTERNATE ABOVE General Crating/Freight Charges (indicate line item costs in Notes ) Installation TOTAL FOR MISCELLANEOUS FURNISHINGS ABOVE Bid Section 4-Miscellaneous Furnishings TOTAL FOR SPECIALTY STORAGE SYSTEMS ABOVE General Crating/Freight Charges (indicate line item costs in Notes ) Installation General Crating/Freight Charges (indicate line item costs in Notes ) Installation Page 9 of 9 Attachment number 3 Page 9 of 9 Item # 29 AUGUSTA RICHMOND COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS HEERY INTERNATIONAL, INC., PROGRAM MANAGER 501 Greene Street Suite 307 Augusta, GA 30901 (706) 842-5543 August 16, 2010 Ms. Geri Sams Director of Procurement Augusta, Georgia 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, GA 20911 RE: Bid Item #10-084A Furniture, Furnishings & Equipment for the Judicial Center Dear Ms. Sams: We have completed our review of the bids that were submitted for the above referenced Bid Item. Bids were solicited and received from two (2) firms and each proposal was deemed to be compliant with the bid specifications. Since the bids came in under budget the bids for the alternate workstations were considered instead of the base bid workstations. The specified alternate submitted by Weinberger was chosen as the preferred system by the courts. Also, a decision was made by the courts to purchase all of the marker boards from one Vendor, the marker boards will be purchased and installed by the Construction Manager, therefore, the marker boards (PB-1, PB-1A, PB-2) which were included in Bid Package 1 were deleted from this analysis and the costs were deducted according to the unit prices provided by the bidders. Heery and RJS Designs analyzed the proposals submitted and recommend that the bid packages should be awarded as follows: Section Award to Amount 1 Weinberger $1,179,066.46 1A - (Items A, B, C, D, F, G, H and I) Modern Business $20,816.20 1A - (Items E and J) Weinberger $1,582.32 2A Weinberger $419,923.58 3 Modern Business $89,850.00 4 Weinberger $1,621.10 Total Award Weinberger $1,602,193.46 Modern Business $110,666.20 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 2 Item # 29 AUGUSTA RICHMOND COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS HEERY INTERNATIONAL, INC., PROGRAM MANAGER 501 Greene Street Suite 307 Augusta, GA 30901 (706) 842-5543 If you require any further information regarding this recommendation, please call me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Heery International, Inc. Don Green, CCM, CCC, LEED® AP Vice President C: Lindsay Johnson, Leslie Wright, Tom Gunnels, Renee Severson Attachment number 4 Page 2 of 2 Item # 29 Attachment number 5 Page 1 of 2 Item # 29 Attachment number 5 Page 2 of 2 Item # 29 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Approve the Purchase of (1) Waste Handler Hydraulic Excavator Department:Solid Waste Caption:Motion to approve the purchase of (1) Waste Handler Hydraulic Excavator from Tractor & Equipment of Augusta for the Solid Waste Department. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:The Solid Waste Department currently uses an excavator in part to move soil, clean ditches, feed the grinder, and to perform land clearing and demolition. The current excavator is too large to optimally perform all of the necessary tasks; and since our operation has grown in size, a second machine is warranted. Analysis:We are proposing the purchase of a new, smaller excavator to provide us with more versatility in accomplishing the required tasks as well as being easier to move from one project to another. This machine is equipped with a ditching bucket as well as a hydraulic thumb which also contributes to it being a very versatile machine. Financial Impact:Funds in the amount of $135,000 will need to be transfered from 541-04- 4210/5212999 to 541-04-4210/5421110. That would ensure that there are adequate funds available for the purchase price of $208,100.00. Alternatives:1. Approve the purchase of (1) Waste Handler Hydraulic Excavator from Tractor & Equipment of Augusta in an amount of $208,100.00. 2. Do not approve the purchase. Recommendation:Option 1 Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: Funds in the amount of $135,000 will need to be transfered from 541-04- 4210/5212999 to 541-04-4210/5421110. That would ensure that there are adequate funds available for the purchase price of $208,100.00. REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 30 Invitation To Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until 11:00 a.m. Friday, June 25, 2010 for furnishing: Bid Item #10-132 Hydraulic Detachable Gooseneck Trailer for Solid Waste Department Bid Item #10-133 Waste handler Hydraulic Excavator for Solid Waste Department Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 706-821-2422 Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. All questions are to be submitted in writing by Tuesday, June 15, 2010 by 5:00 p.m. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference on an eligible local project, the certification statement as a local bidder and all supporting documents must be submitted to the Procurement Department with your bonafide bid package. No Bid may be withdrawn for a period of 90 days after time has been called on the date of opening. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia does not operate a DBE, MBE or WBE Program but rather pursuant to its code of ordinances, this local government operates instead a Local Small Business Opportunity Program. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle May 20, 27, June 3, 10, 2010 Metro Courier May 26, 2010 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Mark Johnson Solid Waste Department Lori Videtto Solid Waste Department Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 1 Item # 30 Ve n d o r s AS C C o n s t r u c t i o n Eq u i p m e n t 23 0 3 A i r p o r t B l v d Ca y c e , S C 2 9 0 3 3 Tr a c t o r & E q u i p m e n t 38 0 9 M i k e P a d g e t t H w y Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 6 Bo r d e r E q u i p m e n t 28 0 4 W y l d s R o a d Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 9 He r t z E q u i p m e n t 20 1 7 R a w l e y R o a d Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 6 Ya n c e y B r o s C o . 41 6 5 M i k e P a d g e t t H w y Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 6 Fl i n t E q u i p m e n t C o . 51 5 C h a m b e r l i n R d Gr o v e t o w n , G A 3 0 8 1 3 Ve r m e e r S a v a n n a h 41 1 - B T e l f a i r R d Sa v a n n a h , G A 3 1 4 1 5 At t a c h m e n t B Ye s Y e s Y e s Bi d d e r ' s F o r m / Ac k n o w l e d g e o f Ad d e n d a Ye s Y e s Y e s Ye a r 20 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 Mo d e l EC 2 1 0 W H P C 2 0 0 L C - 8 C X 2 1 0 B Bi d P r i c e $2 0 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 9 , 0 8 2 . 0 0 $ 1 8 9 , 9 6 3 . 2 4 N o B i d R e s p o n s e N o Bi d R e s p o n s e De l i v e r y D a t e 12 0 D a y s A R O 4 5 - 6 0 D a y s A R O 9 0 - 1 2 0 D a y s N o B i d R e s p o n s e N o B i d R e s p o n s e Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 3 4 Wa s t e H a n d l e r H y d r a u l i c E x c a v a t o r fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - S o l i d W a s t e D e p a r t m e n t Br a n d Ca s e Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : F r i d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 1 0 @ 1 1 : 0 0 a . m . No n - C o m p l i a n t Fa i l e d t o c o m p l e t e Se c t i o n s 1 & 2 o f th e S p e c i f i c a t i o n s Vo l v o K o m a t s u Pa g e 1 o f 2 Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 2 Item # 30 Ve n d o r s Re l i a b l e E q u i p m e n t R e n 40 0 1 W a s h i n g t o n R d Ma r t i n e z , G A 3 0 9 0 7 Gr o v e R i v e r M a c h i n e s 90 2 L o n g w o o d D r Ri c h m o n d H i l l , G A 3 1 3 2 4 Je n k i n s T r a c t o r 35 8 5 M i k e P a d g e t t H w y Au g u s t a , G A 3 0 9 0 6 At t a c h m e n t B Bi d d e r ' s F o r m / Ac k n o w l e d g e o f Ad d e n d a Ye a r Mo d e l Bi d P r i c e De l i v e r y D a t e Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 3 4 Wa s t e H a n d l e r H y d r a u l i c E x c a v a t o r fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - S o l i d W a s t e D e p a r t m e n t Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : F r i d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 1 0 @ 1 1 : 0 0 a . m . Br a n d Pa g e 2 o f 2 Attachment number 2 Page 2 of 2 Item # 30 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 1 Item # 30 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 3 Item # 30 Attachment number 4 Page 2 of 3 Item # 30 Attachment number 4 Page 3 of 3 Item # 30 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Approve the purchase of a 4” Godwin Water Pump off the General Services Administration (GSA) Contract GS-07F- 9491G Department:Solid Waste Caption:Motion to approve the purchase of a 4” Godwin Water Pump off the General Services Administration (GSA) Contract GS-07F-9491G. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:The Solid Waste Department currently uses two 3” water pumps for cleaning out landfill ponds, filling the water truck, and for emergency situations that may arise. These two pumps were purchased in 1994 and are due to be replaced. We are looking to replace them with one 4” skid- mounted water pump with the capability to perform the same functions. Analysis:We are proposing the replacement of two 3” water pumps with one new 4” skid-mounted water pump. The 4” pump is self-priming, saving time and resources, when a pump is required. This pump will be a replacement for asset Nos. ___________ and ___________. These assets have been declared surplus and sent to Fleet for sale. The proceeds from the sale can assist in offsetting the cost of the new pump which is $23,414.30. Financial Impact:Adequate funds are available in the amount of $23,414.30 from 541-04- 4210/5421110. Alternatives:1. Approve the purchase of a 4" Godwin Water Pump off the General Services Administration (GSA) Contract GS-07F-9491G. 2. Do not approve the purchase. Recommendation:Approve the purchase of a 4" Godwin Water Pump off the General Services Administration (GSA) Contract GS-07F-9491G. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: Adequate funds are available in the amount of $23,414.30 from 541-04- 4210/5421110. REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Cover Memo Item # 31 Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE 2"/3" CD75M Yanmar L100V Electric Start Site Trolley (N32-7192) 12,891.97$ Site Trolley (N32-7192)14,503.97$ GP10 Trailer (N32-7882)15,056.08$ GP18 Trailer (N32-7883)15,273.70$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)18,263.96$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)18,731.44$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 16,958.24$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)19,513.26$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)20,154.03$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 18,521.88$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)19,335.94$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)19,827.60$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 18,485.61$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)19,279.52$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)19,920.29$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 18,481.58$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)20,145.97$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)20,786.74$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 19,323.85$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)20,657.78$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)21,298.55$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 19,996.86$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)20,145.97$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)20,786.74$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 19,493.11$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 20,746.44$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 21,387.21$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 19,888.05$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 20,750.47$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 21,391.24$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 19,988.80$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 20,250.75$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 20,891.52$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 19,662.37$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 19,231.16$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 19,871.93$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 18,368.74$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 20,669.87$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 21,310.64$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 19,807.45$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)21,254.22$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)21,894.99$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 20,492.55$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)23,454.60$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 22,604.27$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)23,793.12$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 22,946.82$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)23,934.17$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 22,926.67$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)23,575.50$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 22,725.17$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)21,367.06$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 20,516.73$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 24,264.63$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 23,414.30$ CD100M with PrimeGuard T3/I4A T3 T3/I4A T3 T3/I4A Caterpillar C2.2T T3/I4A *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA T3/I4A T3*John Deere 4024T281 Mitsubishi S3Q2T-VS T3/I4A T3/I4A*Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA Deutz D2011L02I Caterpillar C3013C T3/I4A T3/I4A T3/I4A T3/I4A T3/I4A T3/I4A T3/I4A T3/I4A T3/I4A T3/I4A Deutz D2011L04I CD103M Dri-Prime ® Pumps - CD Series with Diesel Engine 4" *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA Deutz D2011L02I Caterpillar C1.1A *Yanmar 3TNV76CSA 4" *John Deere 4024T281 Kubota V1505 3" Caterpillar C1.5T CD80M Mitsubishi S4Q2T-VS CD100M CD103M 232mm Trimmed Impeller CD103M with PrimeGuard 2"/3" Caterpillar C1.1A CD80D3" *Yanmar 3TNV70ASA Deutz D2011L02I Kubota D722E CD75MA5 All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 36,934.95$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 35,508.33$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 38,849.20$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 37,422.58$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)26,996.97$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 25,981.41$ GP100 Trailer (N32-5169)27,682.07$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 29,056.30$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)27,287.13$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 26,271.57$ GP60 Trailer (N32-7777)27,597.44$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 26,581.88$ GP60 Trailer (N32-7777)27,242.80$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 26,227.24$ CD150M GP60 Trailer (N32-7777)26,420.68$ 275mm Trimmed Impeller Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 25,405.12$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 24,687.78$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 23,672.22$ GP60 Trailer (N32-7777) 25,179.44$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 24,163.88$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 27,931.93$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 26,916.37$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 28,447.77$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 27,432.21$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)49,468.25$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)46,151.56$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705)5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)52,365.82$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)49,053.16$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705)5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)55,452.80$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)52,236.86$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)50,495.90$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)47,183.24$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705)5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)53,397.50$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)50,080.81$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705)5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)58,152.90$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)54,832.18$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. ††John Deere 4045D270 Tier 2 Flex engine has limited stock available. Estimated stock through October 2008. Consult factory for inventory T3/I4A T3 Deutz D914L04 Deutz D914L03 Caterpillar C2.2T T3 *John Deere 4045D270 T2F T3 T2F T3 T3/I4A T3 John Deere 4045T285 Includes PrimeGuard T3/I4A Caterpillar C4.4E-TA Includes PrimeGuard *John Deere 4045T280 *Caterpillar C4.4T *John Deere 4024T281 *John Deere 4045D270 ††(limited stock) T3 T3 T2F *John Deere 4045T280 *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. CD180M Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard 6" John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard Dri-Prime ® Pumps - CD Series with Diesel Engine CD150M CD150M with PrimeGuard CD160M CD150M 240mm Trimmed Impeller 8" x 6"John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard T2F T3 CD140M T3 T3 4" 6" All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)28,205.97$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)30,547.40$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 27,194.44$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)28,492.10$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)30,833.53$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 27,480.57$ GP60 Trailer (N32-7777)28,802.41$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)31,143.84$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 27,790.88$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)28,677.48$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)30,950.40$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 27,665.95$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)39,421.46$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 37,825.58$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)40,291.94$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 38,724.27$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)44,680.61$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-5483)42,065.14$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)47,549.97$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-5483)44,966.74$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)49,992.15$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-5770)47,320.26$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5769) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-5770)74,958.00$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-5770)76,747.32$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7879)56,617.47$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 59,434.44$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7829)61,356.75$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 24,071.19$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 23,059.66$ GP60 Trailer (N32-7777) 24,413.74$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 23,402.21$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 20,315.23$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 19,303.70$ GP60 Trailer (N32-7777) 20,657.78$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 19,646.25$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. Deutz D914L04 T3 T3 T2F Caterpillar C9 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard CD200M John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard *Caterpillar C4.4T John Deere 4045T285 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C4.4E-TA Includes PrimeGuard *John Deere 4045T280 *John Deere 4045D270 John Deere 6090H485 Includes PrimeGuard 3" x 2"ISO 80-50-320 Dri-Prime Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C9 Includes PrimeGuard Dri-Prime ® Pumps - ISO Jet Pump Series *John Deere 4024T281 ISO 80-50-320 Booster Pump T3 Caterpillar C2.2T Caterpillar C2.2T *John Deere 4024T281 CD250M CD300M 12" 18"John Deere 6090H485 Includes PrimeGuard T3 DPC300 Skid-Mounted - No Fuel Tank (N32-6466) 8" *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. 3" x 2" T3 T3 T3 T3 T2F T3 Dri-Prime ® Pumps - CD Series with Diesel Engine (Continued) 12" 10" CD225M8" T3 T3 T3 T3 T3 T2F T3 CD400M 124,333.56$ 123,648.46$ All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)28,858.83$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 27,827.15$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)29,144.96$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 28,113.28$ GP60 Trailer (N32-7777) 29,209.44$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 28,177.76$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 29,322.28$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 28,290.60$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)27,230.71$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 26,146.64$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)39,099.06$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 37,499.15$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 39,776.10$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 38,160.07$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)36,801.96$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 35,206.08$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)40,122.68$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 38,526.80$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 40,799.72$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 39,187.72$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)38,147.98$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 36,721.36$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)47,279.96$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)43,963.27$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)50,181.56$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)46,864.87$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)51,467.13$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)48,251.19$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)43,794.01$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880)39,759.98$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer (N32-6008)46,691.58$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 42,661.58$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer (N32-6008)51,527.58$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 48,311.64$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. HL4M HL4M Caterpillar C4.4E-TA Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) *John Deere 4045D270 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates John Deere 4045T285 Includes PrimeGuard T3 HL4M with 310mm trimmed impeller John Deere 4045T285 Includes PrimeGuard 4" x 4" Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard T2FHL4M with 310mm trimmed impeller T3 T3 4" x 4" T3 T3 John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard T2F T3 Caterpillar C4.4E-TA Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. HL5MS T3 T2F John Deere 6068H485 Includes PrimeGuard T3 John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard Standard Build - Cast Iron Wearplates 4" x 3" HL80M with 295mm trimmed impeller HL80M *Caterpillar C4.4T *John Deere 4045D270 *John Deere 4045T280 Deutz D914L04 Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates T3 T3 T3 Standard Build - Cast Iron Wearplates T3 T2F *John Deere 4045D270 Cast Iron Wearplates T2F Dri-Prime ® Pumps - HL Series with Diesel Engine HL5MS6" x 4" 6" x 4" *John Deere 4024T281 All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)62,529.48$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)59,156.37$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)64,222.08$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)60,848.97$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)59,490.86$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880) 55,944.46$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)61,183.46$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880) 57,637.06$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)64,447.76$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)61,135.10$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)66,140.36$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)62,827.70$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 58,112.60$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)61,425.26$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 59,805.20$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)63,117.86$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759)102,233.04$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759)111,852.65$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-6459) 80,910.31$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-6459) 82,699.63$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759) 108,846.27$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759) 106,911.87$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759) 112,227.44$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. Cast Iron Wearplates 8" x 6" Caterpillar C7 Includes PrimeGuard 10" x 8" 12" x 10"Caterpillar 3406C T3 HL5M Caterpillar C7 Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) T3 HL5M John Deere 6068H485 Includes PrimeGuard T3 Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates Caterpillar C7 Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) T3 6" x 6" T3Caterpillar C15 Includes PrimeGuard HL8M10" x 8" Caterpillar 3406C John Deere 6068H485 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C7 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H485 Includes PrimeGuard8" x 6" T3 Dri-Prime ® Pumps - HL Series with Diesel Engine (continued) John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. T2 Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates T3 T3Caterpillar C9 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6135H485 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C15 Includes PrimeGuard Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates T3 Cast Iron Wearplates 6" x 6" HL6M T3 Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates John Deere 6090H485 Includes PrimeGuard HL6M T2 T3 HL225M Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates HL250M T3 T3 All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 5 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)62,465.00$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)65,781.69$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)65,366.60$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)68,671.20$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)66,216.93$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)69,432.87$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-6459) 84,674.33$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-6459) 87,362.34$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759)110,220.50$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759) 107,786.38$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759)112,195.20$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. † Suction Flange - ASA 150#; Discharge Flange - ASA 300# Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates T3 T3 T3Caterpillar C9 Includes PrimeGuard *†HL130M John Deere 6090H485 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar 3406C 6" x 4" John Deere 6135H485 Includes PrimeGuard 4" x 3"John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard T3 T2F *†HL110M *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. *†HL160M T3 T3 Dri-Prime ® Pumps - Extreme High Head Series with Diesel Engine T2 John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard 8" x 6" Caterpillar C15 Includes PrimeGuard Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 6 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)25,751.70$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 24,865.10$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)26,299.78$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 25,449.45$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)27,021.15$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 26,074.10$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)27,625.65$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 26,598.00$ GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)35,351.16$ Skid-Mounted - 100 Gallons 34,565.31$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 35,991.93$ GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)35,625.20$ Skid-Mounted - 100 Gallons 34,843.38$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 36,265.97$ GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)35,838.79$ Skid-Mounted - 100 Gallons 35,052.94$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 36,479.56$ GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)38,974.13$ Skid-Mounted - 100 Gallons 38,192.31$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 39,618.93$ GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)39,252.20$ Skid-Mounted - 100 Gallons 38,470.38$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 39,897.00$ GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)39,473.85$ Skid-Mounted - 100 Gallons 38,688.00$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 40,114.62$ GP3052C Trailer (N32-7878)48,908.08$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880) 47,731.32$ GP3052C Trailer (N32-7878)50,113.05$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880) 48,932.26$ GP3052C Trailer (N32-7878)51,229.36$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880) 50,052.60$ GP3052C Trailer (N32-7878)53,470.04$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880) 51,253.54$ Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons 34,389.60$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons 48,687.24$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. T3 T3 *John Deere 4045T280 John Deere 4045T285 Includes PrimeGuardCD225MV-200cfm *Caterpillar C4.4T Caterpillar C4.4E-TA Includes PrimeGuard *Caterpillar C4.4T 8" T3 T3 T3 6" CD150MV-120cfm *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA CD225MV-120cfm 4" *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA CD100MV-25cfm CD100MV-60cfm T3 Godwin Wellpoint Pumps with Diesel Engine T2 John Deere 4045T285 Includes PrimeGuard *John Deere 4045D270 T2Caterpillar 3013C T3 T2F *John Deere 4045T280 Godwin Rotary Lobe Pumps with Diesel Engine T3 T3 6" CD150MV-60cfm T2F T38" GRL200 *John Deere 4024T281 12" GRL300 *John Deere 4045D270 *Caterpillar C4.4T *John Deere 4045D270 Caterpillar 3013C 4" T2F T3 All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 7 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE HS80 Pumpend 4,372.55$ HS80 Power Pack GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)12,996.75$ HS80 Hose Set (2) 3/4" x 50'967.20$ HS80 Complete Unit 18,336.50$ HS80 Pumpend 4,372.55$ HS80 Power Pack Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons (N32-8279)12,331.80$ HS80 Hose Set (2) 3/4" x 50'967.20$ HS80 Complete Unit 17,671.55$ HS80 Pumpend 4,372.55$ HS80 Power Pack GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)14,048.58$ HS80 Hose Set (2) 3/4" x 50'967.20$ HS80 Complete Unit 19,388.33$ HS80 Pumpend 4,372.55$ HS80 Power Pack Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons (N32-8279)13,379.60$ HS80 Hose Set (2) 3/4" x 50'967.20$ HS80 Complete Unit 18,719.35$ HS100TD Pumpend 6,637.41$ HS100MR Power GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)13,367.51$ HS100MR Hose (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,128.40$ HS100 Complete Unit 21,133.32$ HS100TD Pumpend 6,637.41$ HS100MR Power Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons (N32-8279)12,666.29$ HS100MR Hose (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,128.40$ HS100 Complete Unit 20,432.10$ HS100TD Pumpend 6,637.41$ HS100MR Power GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)15,305.94$ HS100MR Hose (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,128.40$ HS100 Complete Unit 23,071.75$ HS100TD Pumpend 6,637.41$ HS100MR Power Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons (N32-8279)14,576.51$ HS100MR Hose (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,128.40$ HS100 Complete Unit 22,342.32$ HS100SG Pumpend 8,563.75$ HS100SG Power GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)14,902.94$ HS100SG Hose (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,362.14$ HS100SG Complete Unit 24,828.83$ HS100SG Pumpend 8,563.75$ HS100SG Power Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-8280)14,040.52$ HS100SG Hose (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,362.14$ HS100SG Complete Unit 23,966.41$ HS100SG Pumpend 8,563.75$ HS100SG Power GP60 Trailer (N32-7777)16,740.62$ HS100SG Hose (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,362.14$ HS100SG Complete Unit 26,666.51$ HS100SG Pumpend 8,563.75$ HS100SG Power Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-8280)15,890.29$ HS100SG Hose (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,362.14$ HS100SG Complete Unit 25,816.18$ HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)19,557.59$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 28,943.46$ HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 18,566.21$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 27,952.08$ *Yanmar 3TNV76CSA T3 3" 3" *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA Heidra ® Hydraulic Submersible Pumps with Diesel Engine *Yanmar 3TNV76CSA T3 Caterpillar C1.1A Caterpillar C1.1A T3 *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA 3" 4"*Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA 3" 4" 4" 4" 4" 4" 4" 4" Caterpillar C1.5T Caterpillar C1.5T *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA *John Deere 4045D270 Caterpillar C1.5T T3 T2F *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. Heidra® pumps with an automatic control require an anti-cavitation kit, see Page 11. *John Deere 4045D270 T3 T3 6" T3 6" Caterpillar C1.5T T3 T2F T3 T3 T3 T3 All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 8 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)19,424.60$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 28,810.47$ HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 18,844.28$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 28,230.15$ HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)22,765.47$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 32,151.34$ HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - MV100 Gallons 21,979.62$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 31,365.49$ HS150V Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)19,557.59$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 28,943.46$ HS150V Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 18,566.21$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 27,952.08$ HS150V Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)19,424.60$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 28,810.47$ HS150V Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 18,844.28$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 28,230.15$ HS150V Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)22,765.47$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 32,151.34$ HS150V Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 21,979.62$ HS150MR Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 31,365.49$ HS150VSG Pumpend 9,442.29$ HS150SG Power GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)23,930.14$ HS150SG Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,527.37$ HS150VSG Complete Unit 34,899.80$ HS150VSG Pumpend 9,442.29$ HS150SG Power Skid-Mounted - MV100 Gallons 23,144.29$ HS150SG Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,527.37$ HS150VSG Complete Unit 34,113.95$ HS150VSG Pumpend 9,442.29$ HS150SG Power GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)24,063.13$ HS150SG Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,527.37$ HS150VSG Complete Unit 35,032.79$ HS150VSG Pumpend 9,442.29$ HS150SG Power Skid-Mounted - MV100 Gallons 23,277.28$ HS150SG Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,527.37$ HS150VSG Complete Unit 34,246.94$ 6" 6" 6" 6" 6" 6"*Caterpillar C4.4T *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. Heidra® pumps with an automatic control require an anti-cavitation kit, see Page 11. T3 *Caterpillar C4.4T *John Deere 4045T280 6" *John Deere 4045T280 *John Deere 4045D270 6" *John Deere 4045D270 6" 6" *John Deere 4045T280 *John Deere 4045T280 *John Deere 4045D270 T3 T3 6" Heidra ® Hydraulic Submersible Pumps with Diesel Engine (continued) *John Deere 4045T280 T3 T2F T2F T3 T3 *John Deere 4045T280 6" T3 T2F T3 T3 T3 T2F 6"*Caterpillar C4.4T *John Deere 4045D270 *Caterpillar C4.4T 6" All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 9 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE HS150VSG Pumpend 9,442.29$ HS150SG Power GP100MV Trailer (N32-5212)24,147.76$ HS150SG Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,527.37$ HS150VSG Complete Unit 35,117.42$ HS150VSG Pumpend 9,442.29$ HS150SG Power Skid-Mounted - MV100 Gallons 23,361.91$ HS150SG Hose (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'1,527.37$ HS150VSG Complete Unit 34,331.57$ HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ HS200MR Power GP7052C-250 Trailer-150 Gallons(N32-6008)33,203.17$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS200 Complete Unit 51,390.56$ HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)30,885.92$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS200 Complete Unit 49,073.31$ HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ HS200MR Power GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)36,922.86$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS200 Complete Unit 55,110.25$ HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)34,363.81$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS200 Complete Unit 52,551.20$ HS200 Pumpend 15,717.00$ HS200MR Power GP7052C-250 Trailer-150 Gallons(N32-6008)38,768.60$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS200 Complete Unit 56,915.69$ HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)35,544.60$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS200 Complete Unit 53,731.99$ HS200SG Pumpend 18,477.55$ HS200SG Power GP7052C-250 Trailer-150 Gallons(N32-6008)35,270.56$ HS200SG Hose (2) 1 1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'2,704.13$ HS200SG Complete Unit 56,452.24$ HS200SG Pumpend 18,477.55$ HS200SG Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)31,953.87$ HS200SG Hose (2) 1 1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'2,704.13$ HS200SG Complete Unit 53,135.55$ HS200SG Pumpend 18,477.55$ HS200SG Power GP7052C-250 Trailer-150 Gallons(N32-6008)38,172.16$ HS200SG Hose (2) 1 1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'2,704.13$ HS200SG Complete Unit 59,353.84$ HS200SG Pumpend 18,477.55$ HS200SG Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)34,855.47$ HS200SG Hose (2) 1 1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'2,704.13$ HS200SG Complete Unit 56,037.15$ HS200SG Pumpend 18,477.55$ HS200SG Power GP7052C-250 Trailer-150 Gallons(N32-6008)38,756.51$ HS200SG Hose (2) 1 1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50'2,704.13$ HS200SG Complete Unit 59,938.19$ HS200SG Pumpend 18,477.55$ HS200SG Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880) 35,540.57$ HS200SG Hose (2) 1 1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'; (2) 1/4" x 50' 2,704.13$ HS200SG Complete Unit 56,722.25$ 8" 8" 8" 8" *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. Heidra® pumps with an automatic control require an anti-cavitation kit, see Page 11. 8" Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H275 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard *Caterpillar C4.4T 6" Heidra ® Hydraulic Submersible Pumps with Diesel Engine (continued) 8"T3 T3 T2F T38" 8" Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard T3 6" 8" John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard 8" 8" 8" John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard T2F T2F John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard T3 *Caterpillar C4.4T T3 John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 T3 T2F T3 All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 10 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ HS200MR Power GP7052C-250 Trailer-150 Gallons(N32-6008)33,203.17$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS250 Complete Unit 53,441.83$ HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)30,885.92$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS250 Complete Unit 51,124.58$ HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ HS200MR Power GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)36,922.86$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS250 Complete Unit 57,161.52$ HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)36,830.17$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS250 Complete Unit 57,068.83$ HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ HS200MR Power GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)38,768.60$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS250 Complete Unit 59,007.26$ HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)35,544.60$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,430.09$ HS250 Complete Unit 55,783.26$ HS300 Pumpend 28,963.61$ HS300MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)49,839.01$ HS300MR Hose (4) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 3/4" x 50'5,033.47$ HS300 Complete Unit 83,836.09$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ HS300 Pumpend 28,963.61$ HS300MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)55,078.01$ HS300MR Hose (4) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 3/4" x 50'5,033.47$ HS300 Complete Unit 89,075.09$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ 76.57$ 116.87$ 274.04$ 527.93$ 137.02$ 149.11$ 471.51$ 552.11$ 1,140.49$ 213.59$ 213.59$ 390.91$ 390.91$ Not Required For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. HS300GP-AC Anti-Cavitation Kit for Hydraulic Pump 1-1/4" x 50' HS80GP-AC 1/4" x 50' 1/2" x 50' HS150GP-AC 3/4" x 50'Hydraulic Hose 1" x 50' HS100GP-AC T3 *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. Heidra® pumps with an automatic control require an anti-cavitation kit, see Page 11. HS200GP-AC John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard T2FJohn Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard T3 John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068T275 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard Biodegradable Oil Add the following charge to Heidra Pump Price when Replacing Standard Hydraulic Oil with Biodegradable. HS200 / HS250/ HS300 12" Caterpillar C7 Includes PrimeGuard Heidra ® Hydraulic Submersible Pumps with Diesel Engine (continued) Heidra ® Hydraulic Submersible Pumps - Accessories 10" Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard HS150 HS80 Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard HS100 T3 T2F T3 T3 T3 All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 11 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE Dri-Prime ® Pumps CD Series - Critically Silenced with Diesel Engine Skid-Mounted - 75 Gallons (N32-7972)28,141.49$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 75 Gallons (N32-7972)28,480.01$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 75 Gallons (N32-7972)28,983.76$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 75 Gallons 30,075.89$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 75 Gallons (N32-6938)29,427.06$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 75 Gallons 29,523.78$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 80 Gallons (N32-6783)32,735.69$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-7762) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 80 Gallons 33,074.21$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-7762) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-6451) 46,373.21$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 48,464.78$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons (N32-6877)35,081.15$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons (N32-6877)35,359.22$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons 37,297.65$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7776)62,755.16$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-7754) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 65,789.75$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-8174) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8221)70,089.76$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-7754) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 65,148.98$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-8174) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8221)71,149.65$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-7806) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons (N32-6877)38,039.17$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons (N32-6877)38,317.24$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons (N32-6877)40,255.67$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-6451)46,905.17$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-8376) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8348)49,000.77$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7806)58,297.98$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-6695) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8361)61,199.58$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-7806)5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8361)62,868.00$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-7806)5,899.92$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H285-SP6 Includes PrimeGuard CD80D Critically Silenced3" 8" 10"CD250M Critically Silenced T3Caterpillar C4.4E-TA-SP Includes PrimeGuard *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. CD225M Critically Silenced *Yanmar 3TNV76CSA-SP *Yanmar 3TNV70ASA-SP T3 T2F 4"CD103M Critically Silenced CD140M Critically Silenced CD80M Critically Silenced 4" T3 T3 T3 *John Deere 4045D270-SP2 T3 T3 Caterpillar 2.2T-SP John Deere 4045T285-SP2 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 Caterpillar C1.5T-SP Caterpillar C1.1A-SP T3 T3 Caterpillar C1.1A-SP *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA-SP *John Deere 4024T281-SP1 4"CD100M Critically Silenced 3" T2F Caterpillar C6.6E-SP Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E-SP Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068T275-SP3 Includes PrimeGuard *John Deere 4045T285-SP2 Includes PrimeGuard *John Deere 4045T280-SP2 John Deere 6068H285-SP3 Includes PrimeGuard T3 *Caterpillar C4.4T-SP T3 T3 T2F T3 T3 T2F T3 T3 T3 T3 *John Deere 4045D270-SP2 6"CD200M Critically Silenced T2F T3 Caterpillar C4.4E-TA-SP Includes PrimeGuard *John Deere 4045T280-SP2 CD180M Critically Silenced 6" John Deere 6068T275-SP6 Includes PrimeGuard 6"CD160M Critically Silenced CD150M Critically Silenced 8" x 6" John Deere 6068H285-SP6 Includes PrimeGuard *Caterpillar C4.4T-SP Includes PrimeGuard All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 12 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-6071)78,375.44$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7761) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8211)82,844.71$ Optional GL12 Trailer 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-6071)87,410.70$ Optional GL12 Trailer 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 270 Gallons (N32-8130)101,298.08$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8131) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 270 Gallons (N32-8130)103,091.43$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8131) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 270 Gallons (N32-8156)156,448.63$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8157) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons (N32-8105) 38,107.68$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons 38,397.84$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 90 Gallons 39,248.17$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5852) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8106) 46,606.95$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 48,698.52$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-6914) 55,267.42$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-7806) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8306) 58,302.01$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-7806) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-8306)64,302.68$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-7806) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-8269) 73,986.77$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons 75,679.37$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-8212) 73,962.59$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons 75,655.19$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-8133)106,254.98$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8326) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 135,923.84$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-8326) 11,279.97$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. ** CD400M is rail mounted skid and does not include a fuel tank. T3John Deere 4045T285-SP2 Includes PrimeGuard HL4M Critically Silenced4" x 4" T3 Caterpillar C4.4E-TA-SP Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) HL5MS Critically Silenced Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates T2F CD400M Critically Silenced *John Deere 4045T280-SP2 HL80M Critically Silenced Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates *John Deere 4045D270-SP2 T3 Cast Iron Wearplates T3 HL6M Critically Silenced Caterpillar C9-SP (No Tank) Includes PrimeGuard T2F T3 DPC300 Critically Silenced *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. John Deere 6068T275-SP4 6" x 4"John Deere 6068H285-SP4 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 Caterpillar C7-SP Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) 10" x 8"HL225M Critically Silenced Caterpillar C9-SP Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6090H485-SP Includes PrimeGuard 8" x 6" John Deere 6068H485-SP1 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates T3 T3 Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates Caterpillar C6.6E-SP Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C7-SP Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) HL5M Critically Silenced6" x 6" John Deere 6068H485-SP1 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 John Deere 6068T275-SP2 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H285-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 T2F Caterpillar C6.6E-SP Includes PrimeGuard Dri-Prime ® Pumps CD Series - Critically Silenced with Diesel Engine T3 3" x 3" Dri-Prime ® Pumps HL Series - Critically Silenced with Diesel Engine 12" T3 CD300M Critically Silenced Caterpillar C9-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 *Caterpillar C4.4T-SP 18" Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates John Deere 6090H485-SP1 Includes PrimeGuard 12" All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 13 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE Skid-Mounted - 330 Gallons 132,538.64$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8161) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 330 Gallons (N32-8160) 135,923.84$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8161) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 200 Gallons 84,787.17$ Optional GL 12 Trailer 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 150 Gallons 88,909.86$ Optional GL 12 Trailer 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted - 270 Gallons 103,135.76$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8326) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 270 Gallons 106,158.26$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8326) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 330 Gallons 126,042.28$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8161) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 330 Gallons (N32-8370) 130,426.92$ Optional GL21 Trailer (N32-8161) 11,279.97$ Skid-Mounted - 85 Gallons (N32-7738) 34,948.16$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6926) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 85 Gallons 35,443.85$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6926) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 85 Gallons (N32-7738) 35,891.18$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6926) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 85 Gallons (N32-7738) 36,386.87$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6926) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons (N32-6880) 43,584.45$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6132) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons (N32-6880) 43,866.55$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6132) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons 43,999.54$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6132) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons (N32-6880) 47,211.45$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6132) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons (N32-6880) 47,489.52$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6132) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons 47,622.51$ Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-6132) 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons (N32-8061) 58,757.40$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-8062) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons 59,438.47$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-8062) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons (N32-8061) 59,015.32$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-8062) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted - 130 Gallons 61,759.75$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-8062) 5,899.92$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. † Suction Flange - ASA 150#; Discharge Flange - ASA 300# Dri-Prime ® Pumps HL Extreme High Head Series - Critically Silenced with Diesel Engine T3 Dri-Prime ® Pumps HL Series - Critically Silenced with Diesel Engine John Deere 6135H485-SP Includes PrimeGuard 4" T2Caterpillar 3013C-SP *John Deere 4045T285-SP3 Includes PrimeGuard *John Deere 4045D270-SP3 CD150MV-60cfm Critically Silenced T3 *John Deere 4045D270-SP3 T3 T3Caterpillar C6.6E-SP Includes PrimeGuard Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates HL250M Critically Silenced *Caterpillar C15-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 12" x 10" T3 *†HL110M Critically Silenced T3 Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates 8" x 6" 6" x 4"*†HL130M Critically Silenced *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. T3 8" CD225MV-120cfm Critically Silenced8" *John Deere 4045T280-SP2 CD225MV-200cfm Critically Silenced CD100MV-25cfm Critically Silenced *Caterpillar C4.4T-SP *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA-SP *John Deere 4045T285-SP3 Includes PrimeGuard *Caterpillar C4.4T-SP CD100MV-60cfm Critically Silenced CD150MV-120cfm Critically Silenced *Caterpillar C4.4T-SP T2F T3 Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates 6"*John Deere 4045T280-SP2 *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA-SP Wellpoint Pumps - Critically Silenced with Diesel Engine T3 *†HL160M Critically Silenced *Caterpillar C15-SP Includes PrimeGuard 4" Caterpillar 3013C-SP T2 John Deere 6090H485-SP1 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 T3 T3 John Deere 6135H485-SP Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C9-SP Includes PrimeGuard Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates John Deere 6068H285-SP1 Includes PrimeGuard 4" x 3" Caterpillar C4.4E-TA-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 T2F T3 T3 T3 6" All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 14 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE HS100TD Pumpend 6,637.41$ HS100MR Power Skid-Mounted - 70 Gallons 23,547.29$ HS100MR Hose Set (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50' 910.78$ HS100 Complete Unit 31,095.48$ Critically Silenced Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5705) 3,441.62$ HS100TD Pumpend 6,637.41$ HS100MR Power Skid-Mounted - 70 Gallons 23,914.02$ HS100MR Hose Set (2) 3/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50' 910.78$ HS100 Complete Unit 31,462.21$ Critically Silenced Optional GL5 Trailer (N32-5705) 4,731.22$ HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-7937) 30,640.09$ HS150MR Hose Set (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 40,025.96$ Critically Silenced Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5852) 4,731.22$ HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-7937) 30,918.16$ HS150MR Hose Set (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 40,304.03$ Critically Silenced Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5852) 4,731.22$ HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ HS150MR Power Skid-Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-7937) 31,180.11$ HS150MR Hose Set (2) 1" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'1,325.87$ HS150 Complete Unit 40,565.98$ Critically Silenced Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5852) 5,899.92$ HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-8300) 45,353.62$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,502.63$ HS200 Complete Unit 63,613.55$ Critically Silenced Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-8300) 48,388.21$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,502.63$ HS200 Complete Unit 66,648.14$ Critically Silenced Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-8300) 52,917.93$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,502.63$ HS200 Complete Unit 71,177.86$ Critically Silenced Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-8300) 48,388.21$ HS200MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'2,502.63$ HS250 Complete Unit 68,699.41$ Critically Silenced Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ HS200MR Power Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-8057) 52,917.93$ HS200MR Hose (4) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 3/4" x 50'2,502.63$ HS250 Complete Unit 73,229.13$ Critically Silenced Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705)6,472.18$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. 4" *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. 6" *Caterpillar C4.4T-SP T3 John Deere 6068T275-SP5 Includes PrimeGuard T2F John Deere 6068H285-SP5 Includes PrimeGuard T3 10" *John Deere 4045D270-SP4 *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA-SP T3 John Deere 6068H285-SP102 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 T2F T3 Caterpillar C1.5T-SP T3 Caterpillar C6.6E-SP Includes PrimeGuard Heidra ® Hydraulic Submersible Pumps - Critically Silenced with Diesel Engine *John Deere 4045T280-SP4 T3 Caterpillar C6.6E-SP Includes PrimeGuard 8" All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 15 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE HS300 Pumpend 28,963.61$ HS300MR Power Skid-Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-8300) 69,267.64$ HS300MR Hose (2) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 1/2" x 50'5,186.61$ HS300 Complete Unit 103,417.86$ Critically Silenced Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ HS300 Pumpend 28,963.61$ HS300MR Power Skid-Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-8057) 70,670.08$ HS300MR Hose (4) 1-1/4" x 50'; (1) 3/4" x 50' 5,186.61$ HS300 Complete Unit 104,820.30$ Critically Silenced Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 24,901.37$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons (N32-6984) 24,260.60$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 26,134.55$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons (N32-6984) 25,409.15$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 29,253.77$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-5092) 28,403.44$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 29,596.32$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-5092) 28,745.99$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 32,393.14$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-5092) 31,349.37$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 32,473.74$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-5092) 31,627.44$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 32,695.39$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-5092) 31,845.06$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 33,432.88$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-5092) 32,421.35$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 33,719.01$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-5092) 32,707.48$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 34,029.32$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons (N32-5092) 33,017.79$ T3 T3 *John Deere 4024T281 4"CD103M Quiet Vandal-Pac T3Caterpillar C2.2T 12" T3 T3 T2F *John Deere 4045T280 *Caterpillar C4.4T T3 8"CD200M Quiet Vandal-Pac T3 6"CD150M Quiet Vandal-Pac *John Deere 4045D270 *John Deere 4045D270 *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. *Caterpillar C4.4T *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA Caterpillar C7-SP Includes PrimeGuard *John Deere 4045T280 4"CD100M Quiet Vandal-Pac Caterpillar C1.5T Dri-Prime ® Pumps CD Series - Quiet Vandal-Pac with Diesel Engine T3 John Deere 6068H285-SP102 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T2F T3 Heidra ® Hydraulic Submersible Pumps - Critically Silenced with Diesel Engine (Continued) All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 16 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Electric Motor Mounting GSA PRICE Skid-Mounted 10,788.31$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)12,553.45$ Skid-Mounted 10,876.97$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)12,642.11$ Skid-Mounted 11,775.66$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)13,536.77$ Skid-Mounted 11,876.41$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)13,641.55$ Skid-Mounted 12,102.09$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)13,782.60$ Skid-Mounted 12,347.92$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)14,024.40$ Skid-Mounted 12,331.80$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)14,000.22$ Skid-Mounted 12,650.17$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)14,318.59$ Skid-Mounted 13,798.72$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 15,467.14$ Skid-Mounted 13,992.16$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)15,668.64$ Skid-Mounted 27,226.68$ Optional GL5 Trailer 3,441.62$ Skid-Mounted 29,479.45$ Optional GL7 Trailer 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 16,341.65$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 18,251.87$ Skid-Mounted 16,502.85$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)18,413.07$ Skid-Mounted 33,029.88$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 33,799.61$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 43,185.48$ Optional GL10 Trailer 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 33,948.72$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 35,407.58$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 18,429.19$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 20,335.38$ Skid-Mounted 23,857.60$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954)4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 24,707.93$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954)4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 26,013.65$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954)4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 49,375.56$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705)5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 49,830.95$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705)5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 38,845.17$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 40,175.07$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Soft start & VFD Controls are available, please consult factory for pricing. * Motor speeds are 1800 RPM unless otherwise noted 83,594.29$ 30HP - 230/460 Volt 40HP - 230/460 Volt 265mm Trimmed Impeller 75HP - 230/460 Volt (D-Flange) 125HP - 460 Volt For VFD Drive (D-Flange) 50HP - 230/460 Volt Skid-Mounted18"CD400M Electric 250HP - 460 Volt 1,200 RPM Belt Drive All motors are TEFC Premium Efficiency. Consult Factory for 575 Volt Motors, Explosion Proof and/or Chem Duty Motors. 12"DPC300 Electric 100HP - 460 Volt 1,000 RPM Belt Drive 125HP - 460 Volt 1,100 RPM Belt Drive 12"CD300M Electric 200HP - 460 Volt 250HP - 460 Volt 10"CD250M Electric 100HP - 460 Volt 100HP - 460 Volt (D-Flange) 6" 8"CD225M Electric 75HP - 230/460 Volt 100HP - 460 Volt 8"CD200M Electric 60HP - 230/460 Volt 8" x 6"CD180M Electric 100HP - 460 Volt (D-Flange) CD140M Electric 125HP - 460 Volt (D-Flange) 75HP - 230/460 Volt 330mm Trimmed Impeller (D-Flange) CD160M Electric 150HP - 460 Volt For VFD Drive (D-Flange) CD75M Electric CD100M Electric CD80M Electric 7.5HP - 230/460 Volt 10HP - 230/460 Volt 10HP - 230/460 Volt 2"/3" Dri-Prime ® Pumps - CD Series with Electric Motor * 7.5HP - 230/460 Volt 10HP - 230/460 Volt CD80D Electric 7.5HP - 230/460 Volt 3" 4" 6"CD150M Electric 25HP - 230/460 Volt 240mm Trimmed Impeller 3" 4"CD103M Electric 20HP - 230/460 Volt 4" 15HP - 230/460 Volt 205mm Trimmed Impeller All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 17 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Electric Motor Mounting GSA PRICE Skid-Mounted 16,708.38$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 18,614.57$ Skid-Mounted 17,470.05$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 19,380.27$ Skid-Mounted 23,805.21$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 24,530.61$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 25,441.39$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 26,166.79$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 27,045.33$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 27,815.06$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 24,748.23$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 25,517.96$ Optional GL7 Trailer (N32-5954) 4,731.22$ Skid-Mounted 29,072.42$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 30,567.55$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 26,646.36$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 28,113.28$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 39,989.69$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 41,085.85$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 37,579.75$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 38,671.88$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Soft start & VFD Controls are available, please consult factory for pricing. * Motor speeds are 1800 RPM unless otherwise noted Cast Iron Wearplates 8" x 6"HL6M Electric 125HP - 460 Volt 365mm Trimmed Impeller 150HP - 460 Volt Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates 8" x 6"HL6M Electric 125HP - 460 Volt 365mm Trimmed Impeller 150HP - 460 Volt Cast Iron Wearplates 6" x 6"HL5M Electric 100HP - 460 Volt 375mm Trimmed Impeller 125HP - 460 Volt Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates 6" x 6"HL5M Electric 100HP - 460 Volt 375mm Trimmed Impeller 125HP - 460 Volt Cast Iron Wearplates 6" x 4"HL5MS Electric 75HP - 230/460 Volt 100HP - 460 Volt Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates 6" x 4"HL5MS Electric 75HP - 230/460 Volt 100HP - 460 Volt 28% Chromium Steel Hardened Wearplates 4" x 4"HL4M Electric 60HP - 230/460 Volt 360mm Trimmed Impeller 75HP - 230/460 Volt Standard Build - Cast Iron Wearplates 4" x 4"HL4M Electric 60HP - 230/460 Volt 360mm Trimmed Impeller 75HP - 230/460 Volt 4" x 3"HL80M Electric 30HP - 230/460 Volt 50HP - 230/460 Volt Dri-Prime ® Pumps - HL Series with Electric Motor * Standard Build - Cast Iron Wearplates All motors are TEFC Premium Efficiency. Consult Factory for 575 Volt Motors, Explosion Proof and/or Chem Duty Motors. All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 18 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Electric Motor Mounting GSA PRICE Skid-Mounted 63,541.01$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted 75,493.99$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted 59,071.74$ Optional GL10 Trailer (N32-5705) 5,899.92$ Skid-Mounted 60,256.56$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5705) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted 65,701.09$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted 72,741.50$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5705) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted 73,176.74$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ Skid-Mounted 84,089.98$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-7754) 6,472.18$ 8" GRL200 Electric 30HP - 230/460 Volt Skid-Mounted 23,756.85$ 12"GRL300 Electric 75 HP - 230/460 Volt Skid-Mounted 38,125.41$ Soft start & VFD Controls are available, please consult factory for pricing. * Motor speeds are 1800 RPM unless otherwise noted † Suction Flange - ASA 150#; Discharge Flange - ASA 300# 350HP - 460 Volt (D-Flange) 450HP - 460 Volt for VFD Drive 8" x 6" †HL160M with Motor Adapter Electric Godwin Rotary Lobe Pumps with Electric Motor* Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates †HL130M with Motor Adapter Electric †HL110M with Motor Adapter Electric Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates 100HP - 460 Volt (D-Flange)4" x 3" Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates 350HP - 460 Volt for VFD Drive 200HP - 460 Volt for VFD Drive 6" x 4" 400HP - 460 Volt (D-Flange) Dri-Prime ® Pumps - HL Series with Electric Motor * Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates 10" x 8" HL225M with Motor Adapter Electric 300HP - 460 Volt (D-Flange) 12" x 10" HL250M with Motor Adapter Electric Dri-Prime ® Pumps - Extreme High Head Series with Electric Motor 250HP - 460 Volt (D-Flange) All motors are TEFC Premium Efficiency. Consult Factory for 575 Volt Motors, Explosion Proof and/or Chem Duty Motors. All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 19 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 HP Part Number Voltage/Phase Control Panel Price GSA PRICE 10HP CA101016P29 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,128.40$ 20HP CA201627P29 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,128.40$ 30HP CA303242P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,128.40$ 40HP CA405258P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,410.50$ 50HP CA605070P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,015.00$ 60HP CA605070P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,015.00$ 75HP CA7570100P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,256.80$ 100HP CA10095125P48 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,418.00$ 125HP CA125120160PXX 460 Volt, 3 Phase 4,030.00$ 150HP CA150160220PXX 460 Volt, 3 Phase 4,030.00$ HP Part Number Voltage/Phase Control Panel Price - Mounted GSA PRICE 10HP CA101016P29 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,990.82$ 20HP CA201627P29 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,990.82$ 30HP CA303242P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,990.82$ 40HP CA405258P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,031.12$ 50HP CA605070P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,913.69$ 60HP CA605070P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,913.69$ 75HP CA7570100P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 3,163.55$ 100HP CA10095125P48 460 Volt, 3 Phase 3,324.75$ 125HP CA125120160PXX 460 Volt, 3 Phase 5,263.18$ 150HP CA150160220PXX 460 Volt, 3 Phase 5,263.18$ Part Number Cable Length GSA PRICE 2900-WW-60 60' 57.63$ 2900-WW-125 125' 92.85$ HP Part Number Voltage/Phase Control Panel Price GSA PRICE 10HP CM101016P29 460 Volt, 3 Phase 499.72$ 20HP CM201627P29 460 Volt, 3 Phase 644.80$ 30HP CM303242P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 725.40$ 40HP CM405258P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 846.30$ 50HP CM605070P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,229.15$ 60HP CM605070P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,229.15$ 75HP CM7570100P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,229.15$ 100HP CM10095125P48 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,692.60$ 125HP CM125120160PXX 460 Volt, 3 Phase 3,586.70$ 150HP CM150160220PXX 460 Volt, 3 Phase 3,586.70$ Manual Control Panel for Dri-Prime ® Pumps Automatic Control Panel for Dri-Prime® Pumps (Includes Two 60' Floats) Pilot Float Switch Manual Control Panel for Dri-Prime ® Pumps Automatic Control Panel for Dri-Prime® Pumps (Includes Two 60' Floats) Pilot Floats for Automatic Control Panel (if sold separately) Description Pilot Float Switch All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 20 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 HP Part Number Voltage/Phase Control Panel Price - Mounted GSA PRICE 10HP CM101016P29 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,333.93$ 20HP CM201627P29 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,483.04$ 30HP CM303242P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,567.67$ 40HP CM405258P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 1,692.60$ 50HP CM605070P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,095.60$ 60HP CM605070P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,095.60$ 75HP CM7570100P36 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,317.25$ 100HP CM10095125P48 460 Volt, 3 Phase 2,829.06$ 125HP CM125120160PXX 460 Volt, 3 Phase 4,811.82$ 150HP CM150160220PXX 460 Volt, 3 Phase 4,811.82$ Note: Please consult factory for pricing on control panels over 150HP. All panels listed above are for the across-the-line starting. NEMA 3R Steel Enclosure. Soft start and VFD control are available. Please consult factory for pricing. All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 21 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Pumpend Mounting GSA PRICE Engine Adapter 8,289.71$ Coupling 483.60$ Bearing Bracket 8,692.71$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 8,946.60$ Coupling 483.60$ Bearing Bracket 9,720.36$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 9,575.28$ Coupling 483.60$ Bearing Bracket 9,631.70$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 8,475.09$ Coupling 483.60$ Bearing Bracket 9,929.92$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter for Wellpoint 14,088.88$ Coupling 588.38$ Engine Adapter for Wellpoint 15,035.93$ Coupling 588.38$ Engine Adapter 10,707.71$ Coupling 483.60$ Bearing Bracket 10,816.52$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 14,999.66$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket C.F. Coupling C.F. Engine Adapter 12,057.76$ Coupling 588.38$ Bearing Bracket 11,707.15$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter for Wellpoint 17,578.86$ Coupling 588.38$ Engine Adapter for Wellpoint 21,201.83$ Coupling 588.38$ Engine Adapter 21,568.56$ Coupling 588.38$ Bearing Bracket C.F. Coupling C.F. Engine Adapter 20,927.79$ Coupling 588.38$ Bearing Bracket C.F. Coupling C.F. Engine Adapter 13,419.90$ Coupling 588.38$ Bearing Bracket 13,278.85$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 16,003.13$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket 14,773.98$ Coupling 531.96$ Diesel Engine requires an engine adapter - Flywheel SAE size & bolt circle dimensions required when ordering. Electric Motor requires a bearing bracket - Electric motor shaft diameter required when ordering. CBS Kit includes compressor, coupling and mounting hardware. CD225M CD200M CD80D 8" x 6" 6" CD103M CD150MV - 60 cfm CD150M CD100MV - 60 cfm CD100MV - 25 cfm CD140M 6" CD180M 6" CD150MV - 120 cfm CD160M 8" 8" 4" CD100M 3" CD80M CD75MA5 Godwin CD Series Bareshaft Pumpends 3" 4" 4" 4" 2"/3" All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 22 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Pumpend Mounting GSA PRICE Engine Adapter for Wellpoint 25,558.26$ Coupling 781.82$ Engine Adapter for Wellpoint 28,185.82$ Coupling 781.82$ Engine Adapter 17,429.75$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket 15,958.80$ Coupling 531.96$ Bearing Bracket 33,380.49$ CBS Kit 4,541.81$ Bearing Bracket with Gearbox 35,024.73$ CBS Kit 3,155.49$ Bearing Bracket C.F. CBS Kit C.F. Engine Adapter Standard Build - Cast Iron Wearplates 12,573.60$ Coupling 588.38$ Bearing Bracket Standard Build - Cast Iron Wearplates 12,666.29$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - Cast Iron Wearplates 15,692.82$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket Standard Build - Cast Iron Wearplates 15,652.52$ Coupling 531.96$ Engine Adapter 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates 16,728.53$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket 28% Chromium Steel Wearplates 17,385.42$ Coupling 531.96$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 18,662.93$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 18,191.42$ Coupling 531.96$ Engine Adapter Cast Iron Wearplates 15,217.28$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket Cast Iron Wearplates 15,837.90$ Coupling 531.96$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 21,874.84$ Coupling 1,309.75$ Bearing Bracket Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 19,541.47$ Coupling 797.94$ Engine Adapter Cast Iron Wearplates 16,527.03$ Coupling 1,309.75$ Bearing Bracket Cast Iron Wearplates 17,179.89$ Coupling 797.94$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 24,699.87$ Coupling 1,309.75$ Bearing Bracket Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 23,494.90$ Coupling 797.94$ Diesel Engine requires an engine adapter - Flywheel SAE size & bolt circle dimensions required when ordering. Electric Motor requires a bearing bracket - Electric motor shaft diameter required when ordering. CBS Kit includes compressor, coupling and mounting hardware. DPC300 CD250M HL5MS HL4M CD400M HL80M CD300M12" HL5M Godwin CD Series Bareshaft Pumpends (continued) 12" 10" 18" Godwin HL Series Bareshaft Pumpends HL4M HL6M HL5M6" x 6" 8" x 6" HL5MS 6" x 6" 4" x 4" 4" x 3" 4" x 4" 6" x 4" 6" x 4" CD225MV - 200 cfm 8" CD225MV - 120 cfm All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 23 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Pumpend Mounting GSA PRICE Engine Adapter Cast Iron Wearplates 21,669.31$ Coupling 1,309.75$ Bearing Bracket Cast Iron Wearplates 21,012.42$ Coupling 797.94$ Bearing Bracket Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 33,771.40$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 34,287.24$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ Bearing Bracket Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 34,150.22$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 36,100.74$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ Bearing Bracket Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 35,915.36$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 37,148.54$ CBS Kit 3,195.79$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 38,095.59$ CBS Kit 4,755.40$ Engine Adapter Standard Build - 28% Chromium Steel 39,804.31$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ 3"HS80 Pumpend 4,372.55$ 4"HS100TD Pumpend 6,637.41$ 4"HS100SG Pumpend 8,563.75$ 6"HS150 Pumpend 8,060.00$ 6"HS150V Pumpend 8,060.00$ 6"HS150VSG Pumpend 9,442.29$ 8"HS200 Pumpend 15,757.30$ 8"HS200SG Pumpend 18,477.55$ 10"HS250 Pumpend 17,808.57$ 12"HS300 Pumpend 28,963.61$ 3"ET80 Pumpend 3,691.48$ 4"ET100 Pumpend 4,650.62$ 6"ET150 Pumpend 5,783.05$ 8"ET200 Pumpend 10,615.02$ Diesel Engine requires an engine adapter - Flywheel SAE size & bolt circle dimensions required when ordering. Electric Motor requires a bearing bracket - Electric motor shaft diameter required when ordering. CBS Kit includes compressor, coupling and mounting hardware. HL110M HL225M 8" x 6"HL160M Godwin ET Series Bareshaft Pumpends Heidra ® Hydraulic Submersible Pumpends 10" x 8" 8" x 6" Dri-Prime ® Pumps - Extreme High Head Series Bareshaft Pumpends 6" x 4"HL130M 12" x 10" 10" x 8" 4" x 3" HL8M HL250M Godwin HL Series Bareshaft Pumpends (Continued) HL6M All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 24 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effecitve 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 13,847.08$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 13,121.68$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 14,451.58$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 13,726.18$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 15,068.17$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 14,499.94$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 16,917.94$ Skid-Mounted - 30 Gallons 16,192.54$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 19,114.29$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 18,263.96$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 19,452.81$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 18,606.51$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 25,812.15$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 24,961.82$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 26,090.22$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 25,239.89$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 26,307.84$ Skid-Mounted - 60 Gallons 25,457.51$ T3 ET150 *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA T3/I4A T3 ET200 *John Deere 4024T281 *John Deere 4045T280 *John Deere 4045D270 *Caterpillar C4.4T Caterpillar C2.2T ET100 ET80 Caterpillar C1.1A Godwin ET Pumps with Diesel Engine 4" Caterpillar C1.5T 8" T3 T3 T3 T3 T2F T3 6" 3" *Yanmar 3TNV70ASA *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 25 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE 3,441.62$ 4,122.69$ 4,731.22$ 5,899.92$ 6,472.18$ 8,571.81$ 12,279.41$ 10,159.63$ 11,279.97$ Trailer Accessories Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)80.60$ Ball Hitch 2"96.72$ Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit 201.50$ LED Light Kit 290.16$ Fuel Gauge 60.45$ Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 165.23$ Electric Brakes 487.63$ 584.35$ 612.56$ Hydraulic Brakes 826.15$ 922.87$ 951.08$ Trailer Accessories Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)80.60$ Ball Hitch 2"96.72$ Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit 201.50$ LED Light Kit 290.16$ Fuel Gauge 60.45$ Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 193.44$ Electric Brakes 503.75$ 600.47$ 628.68$ Hydraulic Brakes 842.27$ 938.99$ 967.20$ Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball GP30 Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal GP60 Junction Box (110 volt) Trailers (add to price of unit) GL21 Drop-In Trailer Model GL6 Drop-In Trailer GL7 Drop-In Trailer GL10 Drop-In Trailer GL12 Drop-In Trailer GL18 Drop-In Trailer GL5 Drop-In Trailer GL14 Drop-In Trailer GL16 Drop-In Trailer Trailer Accessories (add to price of unit) Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 26 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Trailers (add to price of unit) Trailer Accessories GSA Price Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)80.60$ Ball Hitch 2"96.72$ Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit 201.50$ LED Light Kit 290.16$ Fuel Gauge 60.45$ Interior Light (12 volt)265.98$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 193.44$ Electric Brakes 503.75$ 600.47$ 628.68$ Hydraulic Brakes 842.27$ 938.99$ 967.20$ Trailer Accessories Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)177.32$ Ball Hitch 2"96.72$ Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)379.02$ Inverter (1750 Watt)379.02$ 379.02$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)379.02$ Work Lights (2)379.02$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)379.02$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 379.02$ Electric Brakes N/A 96.72$ 124.93$ Hydraulic Brakes 745.55$ 842.27$ 870.48$ Trailer Accessories Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)177.32$ Ball Hitch 2"96.72$ Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 237.77$ Electric Brakes N/A 96.72$ 124.93$ Hydraulic Brakes 1,080.04$ 1,172.73$ 1,204.97$ Trailer Accessories (add to price of unit) (Continued) Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle GP3052C Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball GP100 Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle GP7052C Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 27 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Trailers (add to price of unit) Trailer Accessories GSA Price Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)177.32$ Ball Hitch 2"96.72$ Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 237.77$ Electric Brakes N/A 96.72$ 124.93$ Hydraulic Brakes 745.55$ 842.27$ 870.48$ Trailer Accessories Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)177.32$ Ball Hitch 2"N/A Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 237.77$ Electric Brakes N/A N/A 124.93$ Hydraulic Brakes 1,080.04$ N/A 1,204.97$ Trailer Accessories (add to price of unit) (Continued) GL5 Drop-In Trailer Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle GL7 Drop-In Trailer Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 28 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Trailers (add to price of unit) Trailer Accessories GSA Price Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)177.32$ Ball Hitch 2"N/A Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 237.77$ Electric Brakes N/A N/A 124.93$ Hydraulic Brakes 1,680.51$ N/A 1,801.41$ Trailer Accessories Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)177.32$ Ball Hitch 2"N/A Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 270.01$ Electric Brakes N/A N/A 124.93$ Hydraulic Brakes 1,692.60$ N/A 1,813.50$ Trailer Accessories Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)177.32$ Ball Hitch 2"N/A Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 270.01$ Electric Brakes N/A N/A 124.93$ Hydraulic Brakes 1,829.62$ N/A 1,954.55$ Trailer Accessories (add to price of unit) (Continued) GL10 Drop-In Trailer Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle GL12 Drop-In Trailer Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle GL14 Drop-In Trailer Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 29 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Trailers (add to price of unit) Trailer Accessories GSA Price Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)177.32$ Ball Hitch 2"N/A Ball Hitch 2-5/16"128.96$ DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 568.23$ Electric Brakes N/A N/A 124.93$ Hydraulic Brakes 1,829.62$ N/A 1,954.55$ Trailer Accessories Additional Stabilizer Jack (each)334.49$ Ball Hitch 2"N/A Ball Hitch 2-5/16"N/A DOT Light Kit Standard LED Light Kit 120.90$ Fuel Gauge Standard Interior Light (12 volt)270.01$ Inverter (1750 Watt)1,906.19$ 439.27$ Wheel Chock & Holder (each)64.48$ Work Lights (2)382.85$ Yellow Strobe Light (1)374.79$ Spare Tire & Wheel Kit 270.01$ Electric Brakes N/A N/A N/A Hydraulic Brakes 2,607.41$ N/A N/A Trailer Accessories (add to price of unit) (Continued) GL16 Drop-In Trailer Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes 2-5/16" Bal Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle GL21 Drop-In Trailer Junction Box (110 volt) Electric Brakes with 2" Ball Electric Brakes 2-5/16" Ball Electric Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 3" Pintle Hydraulic Brakes with 2" Ball Hydraulic Brakes with 2-5/16" Ball All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 30 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Trailers (add to price of unit) GSA Price 640.77$ 685.10$ 519.87$ 1,398.41$ 741.52$ Battery Trickle Charger (12 volt)241.80$ Block Heater (110 volt)96.72$ Enclosure with Locking Doors 870.48$ H/D Air Cleaner Standard Hospital Muffler 394.94$ Oil Site Level Gauge 185.38$ Pre-Cleaner 48.36$ Racor Water Separator 330.46$ Solar Battery Charger 560.17$ Spark Arrest Adaptor 120.90$ Battery Trickle Charger (12 volt)241.80$ Block Heater (110 volt)96.72$ Enclosure with Locking Doors 906.75$ H/D Air Cleaner 209.56$ Hospital Muffler 435.24$ Oil Site Level Gauge 185.38$ Pre-Cleaner 64.48$ Racor Water Separator 326.43$ Solar Battery Charger 560.17$ Spark Arrest Adaptor 201.50$ Battery Trickle Charger (12 volt)241.80$ Block Heater (110 volt)104.78$ Enclosure with Locking Doors 947.05$ H/D Air Cleaner 225.68$ Hospital Muffler 540.02$ Oil Site Level Gauge 185.38$ Pre-Cleaner 84.63$ Racor Water Separator 326.43$ Solar Battery Charger 560.17$ Spark Arrest Adaptor C.F. Battery Trickle Charger (12 volt)241.80$ Block Heater (110 volt)104.78$ Enclosure with Locking Doors 975.26$ H/D Air Cleaner 378.82$ Hospital Muffler 584.35$ Oil Site Level Gauge 185.38$ Pre-Cleaner 84.63$ Racor Water Separator 326.43$ Solar Battery Charger 560.17$ Spark Arrest Adaptor 185.38$ Battery Trickle Charger (12 volt)241.80$ Block Heater (110 volt)104.78$ Enclosure with Locking Doors 1,418.56$ H/D Air Cleaner 491.66$ Hospital Muffler 584.35$ Oil Site Level Gauge 185.38$ Pre-Cleaner 92.69$ Racor Water Separator 326.43$ Solar Battery Charger 560.17$ Spark Arrest Adaptor 185.38$ Battery Trickle Charger (12 volt)241.80$ Block Heater (110 volt)104.78$ Enclosure with Locking Doors N/A H/D Air Cleaner 588.38$ Hospital Muffler C.F. Oil Site Level Gauge 185.38$ Pre-Cleaner 132.99$ Racor Water Separator 326.43$ Solar Battery Charger 560.17$ Spark Arrest Adaptor 185.38$ JD4045D270 & JD4045T280 Engine Accessories (add to price of unit) JD4045T275 & JD4045T285 JD6068T275 JD6068H275, JD6068H285 & JD6068H485 Trailers Y3TNV88 JD4024T281 Skids Increase Fuel Tank Size (add to price of unit) GP30 to GP60 GP60 to GP100 (includes DOT Lights & Electric Brakes) 30 Gallon to 60 Gallon Skid 60 Gallon to 100 Gallon Skid 100 Gallon to 175 Gallon Skid All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 31 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Trailers (add to price of unit) GSA Price Battery Trickle Charger (12 volt)241.80$ Block Heater (110 volt)104.78$ Enclosure with Locking Doors N/A H/D Air Cleaner 777.79$ Hospital Muffler C.F. Oil Site Level Gauge 185.38$ Pre-Cleaner 132.99$ Racor Water Separator C.F. Solar Battery Charger 560.17$ Spark Arrest Adaptor 185.38$ Battery Trickle Charger (12 volt)241.80$ Block Heater (110 volt)132.99$ Enclosure with Locking Doors N/A H/D Air Cleaner Standard Hospital Muffler C.F. Oil Site Level Gauge 185.38$ Pre-Cleaner 165.23$ Racor Water Separator C.F. Solar Battery Charger C.F. Spark Arrest Adaptor N/A 2,401.88$ 2,252.77$ Godwin PrimeGuard Controller for John Deere/Yanmar Mechanical Engines 1,168.70$ 298.22$ 556.14$ 1,487.07$ 519.87$ 870.48$ 3,518.19$ 4,884.36$ **Mechanical engines with PrimeGuard controller an automatic throttle is required for variable speed. Engine Accessories (add to price of unit) (Continued) Godwin Automatic Level Controller, Two 60' Floats, 25' Plug-in Cord, Stand Mounted Auto Start Controls JD6090H485 JD6135H485 *Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. Consult Factory for these Engine Accessories on Caterpillar Diesel Engines. 280 Gallon 500 Gallon UL Double Wall Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Godwin Automatic Fire Control, 25' Cord, Stand Mounted, Pressure Sensor *Two Float Assembly for Godwin PrimeGuard Controller *Level Transducer for Godwin PrimeGuard Controller *Pressure Transducer for Godwin PrimeGuard Controller **Auto Throttle for Godwin PrimeGuard Controller (JD3016D/4045D) *Two Stainless Steel Float Assembly for Godwin PrimeGuard Controller Godwin Road Ramps 12" 4" 8" 4" Flanged Road Ramp 6" Flanged Road Ramp 8" Flanged Road Ramp 18" 6" 12" Flanged Road Ramp 18" Flanged Road Ramp 12,553.45$ 1,503.19$ 2,115.75$ 2,861.30$ 6,278.74$ All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 32 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE Site Trolley (N32-7192)20,645.69$ GP10 Trailer (N32-7882)20,246.72$ GP18 Trailer (N32-7883)20,891.52$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488)29,439.15$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)30,079.92$ Skid Mounted - 30 Gallons 28,709.72$ GP30 Trailer (N32-3488) 30,998.76$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 31,929.69$ Skid Mounted - 30 Gallons 30,273.36$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)34,444.41$ Skid Mounted - 60 Gallons 33,594.08$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)34,786.96$ Skid Mounted - 60 Gallons 32,546.28$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)42,339.18$ Skid Mounted - 60 Gallons 41,488.85$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)42,617.25$ Skid Mounted - 60 Gallons 41,766.92$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)42,927.56$ Skid Mounted - 60 Gallons 42,077.23$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877)51,346.23$ Skid Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 49,814.83$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 51,692.81$ Skid Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 50,161.41$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)65,656.76$ Skid Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-5483) 63,162.19$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)70,351.71$ Skid Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-5770) 67,857.14$ Skid Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-5770)105,545.70$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-5770)107,330.99$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)42,431.87$ Skid Mounted - 60 Gallons 41,581.54$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400)42,709.94$ Skid Mounted - 60 Gallons 41,859.61$ GP60 Trailer (N32-3400) 43,298.32$ Skid Mounted - 60 Gallons 42,169.92$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 54,521.87$ Skid Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 53,095.25$ GP3052 Trailer (N32-7877) 54,868.45$ Skid Mounted - 105 Gallons (N32-6439) 53,437.80$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. Consult Factory Consult Factory Consult Factory 4"CD140M 316SS Stainless Steel T3 T2F T3 Caterpillar C4.4E-TA Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) 6"CD160M 316SS Stainless Steel 8" x 6"CD180M 316SS Stainless Steel 8"Caterpillar C4.4E-TA Includes PrimeGuard CD250M 316SS Stainless Steel John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard HL4M CD4MCu Stainless Steel T3HL80M 316SS Stainless Steel T3 T3 4" x 4" 6"*John Deere 4045T280 *Caterpillar C4.4T *John Deere 4045D270 CD150M 316SS Stainless Steel *John Deere 4045D270 *John Deere 4045T280 T3 CD300M 316SS Stainless Steel T2F CD225M 316SS Stainless Steel T3 T3 T3 T3John Deere 4045T285 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard 10" John Deere 4045T285 Includes PrimeGuard 4" T3/I4A Stainless Steel - Dri-Prime® Pumps - CD Series with Diesel Engine 4" *Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA T3/I4A T3/I4A 2"/3"Kubota D722E CD75MA5 316SS Stainless Steel Caterpillar C1.5T CD100M 316SS Stainless Steel *Caterpillar C4.4T T3 *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. 12"Caterpillar C9 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6090H485 Includes PrimeGuard Stainless Steel Dri-Prime ® Pumps - HL Series with Diesel Engine 4" x 3" T3 CD103M 316SS Stainless Steel *John Deere 4024T281 T3 Caterpillar C2.2T T3/I4A All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 33 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)63,718.33$ Skid Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880) 59,579.52$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)64,935.39$ Skid Mounted - 150 Gallons (N32-7880) 60,800.61$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)73,120.32$ Skid Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880) 69,904.38$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)77,355.85$ Skid Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880) 74,139.91$ Skid Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880) 77,186.59$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)80,628.21$ Skid Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880) 80,055.95$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)83,271.89$ Skid Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-6459) 116,741.04$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)123,213.22$ Skid Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-6459) 118,530.36$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)125,002.54$ Skid Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759) 147,449.64$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759) 150,834.84$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)83,167.11$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)85,573.02$ Skid Mounted - 175 Gallons (N32-7880)85,000.76$ GP7052C-250 Trailer - 150 Gallons (N32-6008)87,406.67$ Skid Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-6459) 117,547.04$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid Mounted - 200 Gallons (N32-6459) 119,336.36$ Optional GL12 Trailer (N32-5769) 6,472.18$ Skid Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759)145,390.31$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ Skid Mounted - 250 Gallons (N32-7759)148,775.51$ Optional GL16 Trailer (N32-6999) 12,279.41$ For Optional Trailer, add to the skid-mounted price. Stainless Steel Dri-Prime ® Pumps - HL Series with Diesel Engine *Mechanical Engine see Page 26 for PrimeGuard Options. Consult Factory for PrimeGuard pricing on Caterpillar, Deutz, Kubota & Mitsubishi engines. HL225M CD4MCu Stainless Steel T3 T3 John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard 6" x 4" T3 8" x 6" John Deere 6090H485 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C7 Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) HL5M CD4MCu Stainless Steel John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard HL5MS CD4MCu Stainless Steel 6" x 6" Stainless Steel Dri-Prime ® Pumps - Extreme High Head Series with Diesel Engine *HL110M CD4MCu Stainless Steel John Deere 6135H485 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6068H485 Includes PrimeGuard T3 Caterpillar C9 Includes PrimeGuard John Deere 6090H485 Includes PrimeGuard T3 Caterpillar C7 Includes PrimeGuard (2200 RPM Operating Limit) John Deere 6068H485 Includes PrimeGuard T3 HL6M CD4MCu Stainless Steel T3 T3 T3 HL250M CD4MCu Stainless Steel Caterpillar C15 Includes PrimeGuard T3 T3 10" x 8"Caterpillar C9 Includes PrimeGuard T3 4" x 3" *HL130M CD4MCu Stainless Steel6" x 4" Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard 12" x 10" T3 T3 8" x 6" T3 T3Caterpillar C15 Includes PrimeGuard *HL160M CD4MCu Stainless Steel John Deere 6135H485 Includes PrimeGuard All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 34 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Pumpend Mounting GSA PRICE Engine Adapter 316 Stainless Steel 13,689.91$ Coupling 483.60$ Bearing Bracket 316 Stainless Steel 12,718.68$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 316 Stainless Steel 19,307.73$ Coupling 483.60$ Bearing Bracket 316 Stainless Steel 18,957.12$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 316 Stainless Steel 21,439.60$ Coupling 483.60$ Bearing Bracket 316 Stainless Steel 22,156.94$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 316 Stainless Steel 27,375.79$ Coupling 588.38$ Bearing Bracket 316 Stainless Steel 27,686.10$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter 316 Stainless Steel 30,470.83$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket 316 Stainless Steel 29,838.12$ Coupling 531.96$ Engine Adapter 316 Stainless Steel 36,781.81$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket 316 Stainless Steel 33,678.71$ Coupling 531.96$ Bearing Bracket 316 Stainless Steel 60,014.76$ CBS Kit 4,541.81$ Engine Adapter 316 Stainless Steel 27,532.96$ Coupling 588.38$ Bearing Bracket CD4MCu Stainless Steel 28,745.99$ Coupling 483.60$ Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 33,739.16$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket CD4MCu Stainless Steel 32,933.16$ Coupling 531.96$ Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 34,150.22$ Coupling 781.82$ Bearing Bracket CD4MCu Stainless Steel 34,109.92$ Coupling 531.96$ Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 39,465.79$ Coupling 1,309.75$ Bearing Bracket CD4MCu Stainless Steel 36,882.56$ Coupling 797.94$ Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 45,676.02$ Coupling 1,309.75$ Bearing Bracket CD4MCu Stainless Steel 44,785.39$ Coupling 797.94$ Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 68,239.99$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 75,703.55$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ Diesel Engine requires an engine adapter - Flywheel SAE size & bolt circle dimensions required when ordering. Electric Motor requires a bearing bracket - Electric motor shaft diameter required when ordering. CBS Kit includes compressor, coupling and mounting hardware. 6" x 6" 4" x 4" HL5M CD4MCu Stainless Steel 4" 8" 6" x 4"HL5MS CD4MCu Stainless Steel CD250M 316SS Stainless Steel 12" HL250M CD4MCu Stainless Steel HL6M CD4MCu Stainless Steel HL4M CD4MCu Stainless Steel Godwin HL Series Bareshaft Pumpends - Stainless Steel 8" x 6" 4" x 3"HL80M 316SS Stainless Steel HL225M CD4MCu Stainless Steel 12" x 10" 10" x 8" 2"/3" 10" CD150M 316SS Stainless Steel CD100M 316SS Stainless Steel 6" 4" CD103M 316SS Stainless Steel CD225M 316SS Stainless Steel CD300M 316SS Stainless Steel CD75MA5 316SS Stainless Steel Godwin CD Series Bareshaft Pumpends - Stainless Steel All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 35 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Pumpend Mounting GSA PRICE Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 55,662.36$ CBS Kit 3,195.79$ Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 70,525.00$ CBS Kit 4,755.40$ Engine Adapter CD4MCu Stainless Steel 73,583.77$ CBS Kit 4,997.20$ Diesel Engine requires an engine adapter - Flywheel SAE size & bolt circle dimensions required when ordering. Electric Motor requires a bearing bracket - Electric motor shaft diameter required when ordering. CBS Kit includes compressor, coupling and mounting hardware. 8" x 6"HL160M CD4MCu Stainless Steel 6" x 4"HL130M CD4MCu Stainless Steel HL110M CD4MCu Stainless Steel Dri-Prime ® Pumps - Extreme High Head Series Bareshaft Pumpends - Stainless Steel 4" x 3" All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 36 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE 70,839.34$ 31,401.76$ 29,983.20$ 37,503.18$ 39,417.43$ 68,993.60$ 21,911.11$ 26,509.34$ 29,253.77$ 29,507.66$ 49,137.79$ 51,233.39$ 86,910.98$ 92,911.65$ 35,665.50$ 37,817.52$ 38,095.59$ 40,271.79$ UL Tank (N32-7875) UL Tank (N32-7136) UL Tank (N32-7875) 12"DPC300 DBS Critically Silenced John Deere 6068H285-SP2 Includes PrimeGuard T3 Caterpillar C6.6E-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 8"CD225M DBS Critically Silenced John Deere 4045H285-SP2 Includes PrimeGuard T3 UL Tank (N32-7136) Caterpillar C4.4T-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 6"CD150M DBS Critically Silenced John Deere 4045D270 -SP2 Includes PrimeGuard T2F Caterpillar C4.4T-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 John Deere 4045T280SP2 Includes PrimeGuard T3 4"CD103M DBS Critically Silenced John Deere 4024T281-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 DBS Systems - Critically Silenced CD Series with Diesel Engine 4"CD100M DBS Critically Silenced Yanmar 3TNV88BDSA-SP Includes PrimeGuard T3 UL Tank (N32-6850) UL Tank (N32-7813) UL Tank (N32-7818) UL Tank (N32-7818) UL Tank (N32-7818) UL Tank (#66579) UL Tank (#66579) UL Tank (#74170) UL Tank (#65440) UL Tank (#64474) UL Tank (#64474) UL Tank (#49035) UL Tank (#74170) UL Tank (#65440) Pricing includes Godwin PrimeGuard controller. See accessories page 25 & 26 for additional options, including autothrottle, block heater, trickle charger, float switch assembly, pressure transducers, level transducers, etc. UL Tanks are for Permanent Installation only. DBS Systems - CD Series with Diesel Engine Consult Factory for double wall UL tanks. 4"CD100M DBS Yanmar 3TNV88B Includes PrimeGuard T3 4"CD103M DBS John Deere 4024T281 Includes PrimeGuard T3 6"CD150M DBS John Deere 4045D270 Includes PrimeGuard TF2 John Deere 4045T280 Includes PrimeGuard T3 Caterpillar C4.4T Includes PrimeGuard T3 8"CD225M DBS John Deere 4045H285 Includes PrimeGuard T3 Caterpillar C4.4T Includes PrimeGuard T3 12"DPC300 DBS John Deere 6068H285 Includes PrimeGuard T3 Caterpillar C6.6E Includes PrimeGuard T3 All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 37 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Manual CMS00010M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00010M25-115 806.00$ Manual CMS00006M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00006M25-230 926.90$ Manual CMS00016M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00016M25-115 806.00$ Manual CMS00010M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00010M25-230 926.90$ Manual CMS00025M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00025M25-115 846.30$ Manual CMS00016M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00016M25-230 926.90$ Manual CMS00025M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00025M25-115 846.30$ Manual CMS00016M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00016M25-230 926.90$ Manual CM040610M25MTP 523.90$ Automatic CA040610M25 926.90$ Manual CM020204M25MTP 523.90$ Automatic CA020204M25 926.90$ Manual CM020204M25MTP-575 636.74$ Automatic CA020204M25-575 967.20$ 1,825.59$ GSP20SL-6 J Series 2 HP 575 Volt Three 65' 1,825.59$ 2 HP 65' 3" Std or 2" Option GSP20SL-3 J Series 2 HP 230 Volt 65' 460 Volt Three 1,825.59$ GSP20SL-4 J Series 2" 50' 1,636.18$ GSP20-2 J Series 2 HP 230 Volt Single 50' 1,636.18$ GSP20-1 J Series 2 HP 50' 668.98$ 50' 668.98$ GSP10-2 J Series 1 HP 230 Volt Single GSP10-1 J Series 1 HP Single 30' GSP05-1 J Series 1/2 HP 115 Volt GSP05-2 J Series 1/2 HP 230 Volt 415.09$ Single 30' 415.09$ 115 Volt Single Single 115 Volt Single 50' 1,825.59$ GSP20SL-1 J Series 2 HP 115 Volt Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Three Phase 3" Std or 2" Option 50' 1,825.59$ GSP20SL-2 J Series 2 HP 230 Volt Single Standard automatic control panel includes teardrop floats. Confined space floats can be used with any automatic control panel to operate a pump. See page 34 for pricing. Three All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 38 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Manual CMS00010M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00010M25-115 806.00$ Manual CMS00006M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00006M25-230 926.90$ Manual CMS00016M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00016M25-115 806.00$ Manual CMS00010M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00010M25-230 926.90$ 1/2 HP 115 Volt Single 30' 30SSDV120V-WP 68.51$ 1/2 HP 230 Volt Single 30' 30SSDV230V-WP 68.51$ 1 HP 115 Volt Single 50' 50SSDV120V-WP 77.38$ 1 HP 230 Volt Single 50' 50SSDV230V-WP 77.38$ 60' 2900-WW-60 57.63$ 125' 2900-WW-125 92.85$ 100' CSF-100NO 126.54$ 175' CSF-175NO 157.98$ Pilot Floats Confined Space Float Switch GSP10-1/GST10-1 GSP05-1/GST05-1 GSP10-2/GST10-2 Confined Space Floats for use with Slimline Pumps Standard automatic control panel includes teardrop floats. Confined space floats can be used with any automatic control panel to operate a pump. See page 34 for pricing. When using Cam and Groove piping with any Submersible Pump, a Male Cam and Groove Fitting is recommended as the adapter to the pump connection. The "ears" of the Female Cam and Groove Fitting will be facing upward when dropped in the sump. 230 Volt Single 50' 230 Volt Single 30' 415.09$ 2" GST05-1 J Series 1/2 HP GST05-2 J Series 1/2 HP GST10-1 J Series 1 HP GST10-2 J Series 1 HP Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GST Trash Pumps - Single Phase 115 Volt Single 30' 415.09$ When using Quick Disconnect piping with any Submersible Pump, a Female Quick Disconnect Fitting is recommended as the adapter to the pump connection. The "ears" of the Male Quick Disconnect Fitting will be facing upward when dropped in the sump. Pilot Floats for Automatic Control Panel (if sold separately) GSP05-2/GST05-2 Piggy-back Float Switch, Single Switch, Normally Open 668.98$ 115 Volt Single 50' 668.98$ All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 39 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Manual CMS20012P29B 604.50$ Automatic CAS20012P29B 967.20$ Manual CMS45020P29 806.00$ Automatic CAS45020P29 1,249.30$ Manual CMS60025P29 886.60$ Automatic CAS60025P29 1,329.90$ Manual CMS60025P29 886.60$ Automatic CAS60025P29 1,329.90$ 65' 4,312.10$ 6.0 HP 3,506.10$ 6.0 HP 230 Volt Single Single Single 230 Volt 230 Volt 4" *GSP45HV-2 G Series *GSP25HV-2 G Series *GSP60HH-2 G Series 3" *GSP60HV-2 G Series 2.5 HP 2,821.00$ Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Single 65' 65' 4,312.10$ 4.5 HP 230 Volt 65' All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 40 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM030406P29 499.72$ Automatic CA030406P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM030406P29 499.72$ Automatic CA030406P29-575 1,168.70$ 3,506.10$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ 3,506.10$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29 1,128.40$ 3,506.10$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ 3,506.10$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ 3,506.10$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29 1,128.40$ 3,506.10$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ 65' 65' Three 65' Three 5.5 HP Three 5.5 HP 460 Volt 5.5 HP 2,700.10$ 2,700.10$ 2,700.10$ 65' 65'3.5 HP 460 Volt Three 3.5 HP 575 Volt Three Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Three Phase 3" GSP35HV - 3 G Series 3.5 HP 230 Volt Three 65' Three 5.5 HP GSP35HV - 4 G Series 4" * GSP25, 45 & 60 require a Godwin Custom Control Panel for Operation. Panel must be purchased or warranty is void. Standard automatic control panel includes teardrop floats. Confined space floats can be used with any automatic control panel to operate a pump. See page 34 for pricing. 4" 5.5 HP 575 Volt GSP55HH - 6 G Series 65' GSP55HH - 3 G Series GSP35HV - 6 G Series GSP55HH - 4 G Series GSP55HV - 4 G Series 65'460 Volt Three GSP55HV - 6 G Series GSP55HV - 3 G Series 5.5. HP 230 Volt 65' Three 575 Volt 230 Volt All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 41 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM303242P29 725.40$ Automatic CA303242P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM303242P29 725.40$ Automatic CA303242P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29-575 1,168.70$ 6,609.20$ 575 Volt Three 13.0 HP 13.0 HP 65'460 Volt 65' 6,609.20$ Three 65' 6,609.20$ 6,045.00$ 230 Volt Three 65' Three Standard automatic control panel includes teardrop floats. Confined space floats can be used with any automatic control panel to operate a pump. See page 34 for pricing. 6,045.00$ GSP130HV - 4 G Series 13.0 HP 460 Volt Three 65' 6,045.00$ Three 65' 460 Volt8.0 HP Three 4" GSP130HV - 3 G Series 13.0 HP 230 Volt GSP130HV - 6 G Series 13.0 HP 575 Volt 575 Volt Three 65' 4,312.10$ 4,312.10$ 65' 4,312.10$ 4,312.10$ 65' 230 Volt Three Three 65'575 Volt8.0 HP 4" GSP80HV - 3 G Series 8.0 HP GSP80HH - 3 G Series 8.0 HP GSP80HH - 6 G Series 8.0 HP GSP80HH - 4 G Series 230 Volt GSP80HV - 4 G Series 8.0 HP 460 Volt Three 65' GSP130HH - 6 G Series 4,312.10$ GSP80HV - 6 G Series GSP130HH - 4 G Series GSP130HH - 3 G Series Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Three Phase (continued) 4,312.10$ Three 65' 13.0 HP All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 42 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Manual CM404050P36 846.30$ Automatic CA404050P36 1,410.50$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM404050P36 846.30$ Automatic CA404050P36 1,410.50$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM7570100P36 1,442.74$ Automatic CA7570100P36 2,075.45$ Manual CM303242P36 725.40$ Automatic CA303242P36 1,128.40$ Manual CM303242P36 725.40$ Automatic CA303242P36-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM7570100P36 1,442.74$ Automatic CA7570100P36 2,256.80$ Manual CM303242P36 725.40$ Automatic CA303242P36 1,128.40$ Manual CM303242P36 725.40$ Automatic CA303242P36-575 1,168.70$ 12,573.60$ Standard automatic control panel includes teardrop floats. Confined space floats can be used with any automatic control panel to operate a pump. See page 34 for pricing. GSP300HH - 6 G Series 30.0 HP 575 Volt Three Three 12,573.60$ GSP300HH - 4 G Series 30.0 HP 460 Volt Three 65' 12,573.60$ GSP300HH - 3 G Series 30.0 HP GSP300HV - 4 G Series 30.0 HP 460 Volt 230 Volt GSP300HV - 6 G Series 30.0 HP 575 Volt 9,430.20$ GSP160HH - 6 G Series 16.0 HP 575 Volt Three 65' 9,430.20$ 16.0 HP 460 Volt Three 9,430.20$ 575 Volt Three16.0 HP 16.0 HP 230 Volt Three 65' 16.0 HP 16.0 HP 230 Volt 9,430.20$ 9,430.20$ Three 6" 6" GSP300HV - 3 G Series 12,573.60$ Three 65' 12,573.60$ 65' 12,573.60$ 30.0 HP 230 Volt 65' Three 65' GSP160HH - 4 G Series GSP160HV - 6 G Series GSP160HV - 4 G Series GSP160HH - 3 G Series Three 460 Volt 65' 65' 65' Three 65' Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Three Phase (continued) 65' 9,430.20$ GSP160HV - 3 G Series All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 43 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Manual CM605070P36 1,269.45$ Automatic CA605070P36 2,015.00$ Manual CM605070P36-575 1,269.45$ Automatic CA605070P36-575 2,095.60$ Manual CM605070P36 1,269.45$ Automatic CA605070P36 2,015.00$ Manual CM605070P36-575 1,269.45$ Automatic CA605070P36-575 2,095.60$ Manual CM605070P36 1,269.45$ Automatic CA605070P36 2,015.00$ Manual CM605070P36-575 1,269.45$ Automatic CA605070P36-575 2,095.60$ Manual CM10095125P48 1,692.60$ Automatic CA10095125P48 2,418.00$ Manual CM7570100P36-575 1,491.10$ Automatic CA7570100P36-575 2,418.00$ Manual CM10095125P48 1,692.60$ Automatic CA10095125P48 2,418.00$ Manual CM7570100P36-575 1,491.10$ Automatic CA7570100P36-575 2,418.00$ Manual CM10095125P48 1,692.60$ Automatic CA10095125P48 2,418.00$ Manual CM7570100P36-575 1,491.10$ Automatic CA7570100P36-575 2,418.00$ 31,353.40$ GSP900SV - 6 G Series 90.0 HP 575 Volt Three 65' 31,353.40$ 90.0 HP 460 Volt 31,353.40$ GSP900HH - 6 G Series Three 65' 31,353.40$ 6" GSP900HH - 4 G Series 90.0 HP 460 Volt 90.0 HP 575 Volt Three 65' 31,353.40$ GSP900HV - 6 G Series 90.0 HP 575 Volt Three 65' 31,353.40$ GSP900HV - 4 G Series 19,827.60$ GSP600SV - 6 G Series 60.0 HP 8" GSP600SV - 4 G Series 60.0 HP 460 Volt 575 Volt 18,941.00$ 6" GSP600HH - 4 G Series 60.0 HP 460 Volt Three 65' 18,941.00$ GSP600HH - 6 G Series 18,941.00$ 8" GSP600HV - 4 G Series 60.0 HP 460 Volt Three 65' 18,941.00$ GSP600HV - 6 G Series 60.0 HP 575 Volt 8" Three 65' 19,827.60$ Three 65' Three 65' Three 65' Three 65' Three 65' Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Three Phase (continued) 60.0 HP 575 Volt 90.0 HP 460 Volt 10" GSP900SV - 4 G Series Standard automatic control panel includes teardrop floats. Confined space floats can be used with any automatic control panel to operate a pump. See page 34 for pricing. All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 44 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Manual CMS00025M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00025M25-115 846.30$ Manual CMS00016M25 241.80$ Automatic CAS00016M25-230 926.90$ Manual CMS42020P29 644.80$ Automatic CAS42020P29 1,168.70$ Manual CMS42020P29 644.80$ Automatic CAS42020P29 1,168.70$ Manual CM040610M25MTP 523.90$ Automatic CA040610M25 926.90$ Manual CM020204M25MTP 523.90$ Automatic CA020204M25 926.90$ Manual CM020204M25MTP-575 644.80$ Automatic CA020204M25-575 967.20$ Manual CM101016P29MTP 644.80$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29MTP 644.80$ Automatic CA050610P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29MTP 644.80$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM101016P29MTP 644.80$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29MTP 644.80$ Automatic CA050610P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29MTP 644.80$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ 100' 3,989.70$ * GSP40SL requires a Godwin Custom Control Panel for Operation. Panel must be purchased or warranty is void. Standard automatic control panel includes teardrop floats. Confined space floats can be used with any control panel to operate a pump. See page 34 3,989.70$ GSP60SL-3HH G Series 6.0 HP GSP60SL-6HH G Series 6.0 HP 575 Volt Three 6.0 HP 575 Volt Three 100' 100' 6.0 HP 460 Volt Three 100' 230 Volt Three 100' 3,707.60$ 575 Volt Three 65' 1,825.59$ 1,825.59$ GSP20SL-4 J Series 2.0 HP 460 Volt Three 65' 1,825.59$ 2.0 HP 230 Volt Three 65' 4.0 HP 230 Volt Single 100' 50' 1,825.59$ 3" *GSP40SL-2HV G Series 4.0 HP 230 Volt Single 100' 3,707.60$ *GSP40SL-2HH G Series 3,989.70$ Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP SL Slimline Dewatering Pumps - Three Phase 2" or 3" GSP20SL-3 J Series GSP20SL-6 J Series 2.0 HP 3" GSP60SL-3HV G Series 6.0 HP GSP60SL-4HV G Series 230 Volt Three 3,989.70$ GSP60SL-4HH G Series 6.0 HP 460 Volt Three 100' 3,707.60$ GSP60SL-6HV G Series 3,707.60$ Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP SL Slimline Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase 3" std or 2" option GSP20SL-1 J Series 2.0 HP 115 Volt Single 50' 1,825.59$ GSP20SL-2 J Series 2.0 HP 230 Volt Single All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 45 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model HP Volt Phase Cable GSA PRICE Control Panel Part Number GSA PRICE Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSP Dewatering Pumps - Single Phase Manual CMS30016P29B 604.50$ Automatic CAS30016P29B 967.20$ Manual CMS60025P29 886.60$ Automatic CAS60025P29 1,329.90$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM030406P29 499.72$ Automatic CA030406P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM030406P29 499.72$ Automatic CA030406P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ Manual CM201627P29 644.80$ Automatic CA201627P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM101016P29 499.72$ Automatic CA101016P29 1,128.40$ Manual CM050610P29 499.72$ Automatic CA050610P29-575 1,168.70$ 65' 5,843.50$ * GSL30 & GSL60 Require a Godwin Custom Control Panel for Operation. Panel must be purchased. Standard automatic control panel includes teardrop floats. Confined space floats can be used with any automatic control panel to operate a pump. See page 34 for pricing. 5,843.50$ GSL80HH-4 G Series 8.0 HP 460 Volt Three 65' 5,843.50$ 65' 5,843.50$ 460 Volt Three GSL80HV-6 G Series 8.0 HP 575 Volt Three GSL80HV-4 G Series 5,843.50$ 3" GSL80HV-3 G Series 8.0 HP 230 Volt Three 65' 5,843.50$ 5,843.50$ 8.0 HP 5,843.50$ GSL80SV-4 G Series 8.0 HP 460 Volt Three 65' 5,843.50$ 65' 4" GSL80SV-3 G Series 8.0 HP 230 Volt GSL80SV-6 G Series 8.0 HP 575 Volt 65' 65' 4,030.00$ GSL35HV-6 G Series 3.5 HP 575 Volt Three 65' 4,030.00$ 3.5 HP 460 Volt Three 65' 65' 5,843.50$ 3" GSL35HV-3 G Series 3.5 HP 230 Volt Three 65' 4,030.00$ GSL35HV-4 G Series 3"*GSL30HV-2 G Series 3.0 HP 230 Volt Single 65' 4,030.00$ 230 Volt Three 3" GSL80HH-3 G Series 8.0 HP GSL80HH-6 G Series 8.0 HP 575 Volt Three 65' Three Three Single Sub-Prime ® Electric Submersible GSL Sludge Pumps - Single and Three Phase 3"*GSL60HV-2 G Series 6.0 HP 230 Volt All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 46 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Godwin Pump ® Model HP Gasoline Engine GSA PRICE 1" GWP-25HX 1.1 Honda GX25 334.49$ 2" GTP-50HX 5.5 Honda GX160 1,011.53$ 2" GPP-50HX 5.5 Honda GX160 753.61$ 2" GPL-50HX 4.0 Honda GX120 495.69$ 3" GDP-80HX 5.5 Honda GX160 2,051.27$ 157.17$ 572.26$ 2,688.01$ 697.19$ 1,269.45$ 1,434.68$ 13.0 Honda GX390 2,111.72$ Honda GX240 Wet-Prime Trash Pump 8.0 4" GTP-100HX 11.0 Honda GX340 GTP-80HX 8.0 Honda GX240 Honda GX120 3" GWP-80HX 5.5 Honda GX160 4.02" GWP-50HX 4" GWP-100HX 3" Wet-Prime Diaphragm Pumps Wet-Prime Pressure Pumps 2 1/2" GPP-65HX Wet-Prime Dewatering Pump 157.17$ All GWP, GTP, GPL & GPP50 Models GDP & GPP65 Models Wet-Prime Wheel Kits GWK-2SA GWK-2FA Wet-Prime Plastic Pumps All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 47 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE Trailer 19,747.00$ Skid Mounted 18,739.50$ Trailer 21,137.35$ Skid Mounted 19,646.25$ Trailer (N32-7205) 27,262.95$ Skid Mounted 24,683.75$ Trailer (N32-7206) 32,018.35$ Skid Mounted 29,157.05$ Trailer (N32-7206 or N32-7981) 36,471.50$ Skid Mounted 32,925.10$ Trailer (N32-7207) 48,742.85$ Skid Mounted 42,697.85$ Trailer (N32-7207) 55,291.60$ Skid Mounted 49,246.60$ Trailer (N32-7207) 55,734.90$ Skid Mounted 49,689.90$ Trailer (N32-7207) 60,409.70$ Skid Mounted 54,364.70$ Trailer (N32-7207) 70,504.85$ Skid Mounted 64,459.85$ Trailer (N32-7208) 94,060.20$ Skid Mounted 83,824.00$ Trailer (N32-7208) 95,672.20$ Skid Mounted 85,436.00$ Trailer (N32-7209) 120,436.55$ Skid Mounted 109,555.55$ Bold = New Model for 2008 GHP20kW-R is a new 2008 model with the option to be skid based or trailer mounted. GLT416-K is a new 2008 Kubota engine product. GLT416 Mitsubishi L3E Integral Trailer T3 T3 T3 T3 T2F T3 Godwin Power Generators - "R" Series (Rental) T3 GLT416-K Kubota D905 GLT416-ALC includes the auto light controller designed to automate light tower operations including preheating, cranking, warm-up, energizing and de-energizng the lights, cool down and shut down. T3/I4A JD6068HF485 T2F JD6081HF070 T3/I4A T2 T3/I4A T2 T3 Isuzu 4LE JD6068TF275 JD4045HF285 JD5030TF270 JD4045HF285 JD6068HF275 JD6068HF285 JD6068HF285 JD4024TF281 20kW-R 325kW-R GHP325KW-R 26kW-R GHP26KW-R GHP60KW-R60kW-R GHP235KW-R GHP20KW-R 255kW-R 45kW-R GHP45KW-R 80kW-R GHP80KW-R 185kW-R GHP140KW-R140kW-R 100kW-R GHP115KW-R115kW-R GHP100KW-R* 125kW-R GHP125KW-R* GHP185KW-R 6kW Godwin Lights Additional sizes of generators and light towers are available. Please consult the factory. 6kW GLT416-ALC Mitsubishi L3E T3/I4A Integral Trailer 235kW-R 9,269.00$ GHP255KW-R JD6090HF070 T2F JD6135HF485 Integral Trailer6kW 10,478.00$ R-Series are stocked at Corporate, call for availability * Limited availability of GHP65kW, GHP100kW and GHP125kW models. (Tier 2 engines) 9,269.00$ All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 48 of 67 Item # 31 CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Size Model Diesel Engine Tier Mounting GSA PRICE 20kW-S G20KW-S (3p)Isuzu 4LE T2 Integral Trailer 15,213.25$ Trailer 18,578.30$ Skid Mounted 17,570.80$ Trailer 20,017.01$ Skid Mounted 18,525.91$ Trailer (N32-7205) 25,671.10$ Skid Mounted 23,091.90$ Trailer (N32-7206) 29,455.27$ Skid Mounted 26,593.97$ Trailer (N32-7206 or N32-7981) 33,872.15$ Skid Mounted 30,325.75$ Trailer (N32-7207) 44,491.20$ Skid Mounted 38,446.20$ Trailer (N32-7207) 51,100.40$ Skid Mounted 45,055.40$ Trailer (N32-7207) 51,604.15$ Skid Mounted 45,559.15$ Trailer (N32-7207) 56,258.80$ Skid Mounted 50,213.80$ Trailer (N32-7207) 66,374.10$ Skid Mounted 60,329.10$ Trailer (N32-7208) 90,433.20$ Skid Mounted 80,197.00$ Trailer (N32-7208) 90,836.20$ Skid Mounted 80,600.00$ Trailer (N32-7209) 116,458.94$ Skid Mounted 105,577.94$ Bold = New Model for 2008 GHP20kW-S is a new 2008 model with the option to be skid based or trailer mounted. T2F T2GHP20KW-S GHP80KW-S T2F JD6068HF285 T3 T2F 26kW-S 20kW-S T3 GHP45KW-S GHP26KW-S GHP100KW-S* T3 T3 T3 JD4045HF285 GHP125KW-S* Additional sizes of generators and light towers are available. Please consult the factory. * Limited availability of GHP65kW, GHP100W and GHP125KW models. GHP325KW-S 255kW-S T3 GHP255KW-S JD6090HF070 JD6135HF485325kW-S JD4024TF281 JD5030TF270 T2 T3/I4A JD4045HF285 GHP140KW-S140kW-S T3JD6068HF285 45kW-S 80kW-S JD6068HF275 100kW-S JD6068TF275 GHP60KW-S60kW-S GHP115KW-S115kW-S 125kW-S JD6081HF070GHP235KW-S235kW-S JD6068HF485GHP185KW-S185kW-S G20kW-S is stocked at Corporate. Call for availability. All other S Series are non-stock, consult factory for leadtimes. Isuzu 4LE Godwin Power Generators - "S" Series (Standard) All prices EX WORKS Bridgeport, NJ. All prices listed in US Dollars. Subject to change without notice. © 2008 Godwin Pumps of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Duplication or electronic transmittal of this document is strictly prohibited. Attachment number 1 Page 49 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE 2" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/QD 80.60$ 2" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/QD 104.78$ 3" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/QD 112.84$ 3" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/QD 150.72$ 4" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/QD 170.07$ 4" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/QD 227.29$ 6" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/QD 298.22$ 6" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/QD 405.42$ 8" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/QD 631.10$ 8" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/QD 844.69$ 10" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/QD 810.84$ 10" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/QD 1,146.94$ 12" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/QD 1,343.60$ 12" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/QD 1,815.11$ 2" - 6" Hose: 3 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 8" - 12" Hose: 2 Double Bolt Clamps Each End 1½" x 10’ Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 54.81$ 1½" x 20’ Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 76.57$ 2" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 66.90$ 2" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 91.08$ 3" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 100.75$ 3" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 137.83$ 4" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 151.53$ 4" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 209.56$ 6" x 10' Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 307.89$ 6" x 20' Water Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 415.90$ 2" - 4" Hose: 2 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 6" Hose: 3 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 8" - 12" Hose: 2 Double Bolt Clamps Each End 2" x 10' Oil Suction Hose w/QD 123.32$ 2" x 20' Oil Suction Hose w/QD 190.22$ 3" x 10' Oil Suction Hose w/QD 172.48$ 3" x 20' Oil Suction Hose w/QD 270.01$ 4" x 10' Oil Suction Hose w/QD 236.16$ 4" x 20' Oil Suction Hose w/QD 359.48$ 6" x 10' Oil Suction Hose w/QD 459.42$ 6" x 20' Oil Suction Hose w/QD 727.82$ 2" - 6" Hose: 3 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 2" x 10' Oil Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 109.62$ 2" x 20' Oil Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 176.51$ 3" x 10' Oil Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 160.39$ 3" x 20' Oil Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 257.11$ 4" x 10' Oil Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 217.62$ 4" x 20' Oil Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 341.74$ 6" x 10' Oil Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 469.09$ 6" x 20' Oil Suction Hose w/Cam and Groove 737.49$ 2" - 4" Hose: 2 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 6" Hose: 3 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Oil Suction Hose (Red Stripe), CG Fittings Water Suction Hose (Black Rubber), QD Fittings Description Water Suction Hose (Black Rubber), CG Fittings Oil Suction Hose (Red Stripe), QD Fittings All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 50 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description 2" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 74.96$ 2" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 94.30$ 2" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 103.97$ 3" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 112.03$ 3" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 149.11$ 3" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 166.84$ 4" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 174.10$ 4" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 234.55$ 4" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 265.17$ 6" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 305.47$ 6" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 419.93$ 6" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 477.96$ 8" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 638.35$ 8" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 862.42$ 8" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/QD 971.23$ 2" - 6" Hose: 3 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 8" Hose: 2 Double Bolt Clamps Each End 2" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 67.70$ 2" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 87.05$ 2" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 96.72$ 3" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 108.00$ 3" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 144.27$ 3" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 162.81$ 4" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 165.23$ 4" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 225.68$ 4" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 256.31$ 6" x 10' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 315.15$ 6" x 20' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 430.40$ 6" x 25' Kanaflex 110 GR w/Cam and Groove 487.63$ 2" - 6" Hose: 3 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 2" x 10' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 78.18$ 2" x 20' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 99.94$ 2" x 25' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 111.23$ 3" x 10' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 114.45$ 3" x 20' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 157.17$ 3" x 25' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 178.13$ 4" x 10' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 183.77$ 4" x 20' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 257.92$ 4" x 25' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 295.00$ 6" x 10' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 323.21$ 6" x 20' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 457.81$ 6" x 25' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/QD 524.71$ 2" - 6" Hose: 1 Powerlock Each End Kanaflex 110 GR (Plain Solid Green), CG Fittings Kanaflex 300EPDM (Green & Black), QD Fittings Kanaflex 110 GR (Plain Solid Green), QD Fittings All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 51 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description 2" x 10' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 70.93$ 2" x 20' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 92.69$ 2" x 25' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 103.97$ 3" x 10' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 110.42$ 3" x 20' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 152.33$ 3" x 25' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 174.10$ 4" x 10' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 174.90$ 4" x 20' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 249.05$ 4" x 25' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 286.13$ 6" x 10' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 333.68$ 6" x 20' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 467.48$ 6" x 25' Kanaflex 300EPDM w/Cam and Groove 534.38$ 2" - 6" Hose: 1 Powerlock Each End 2" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 90.27$ 2" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 124.93$ 2" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 141.86$ 3" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 113.65$ 3" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 154.75$ 3" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 174.90$ 4" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 170.87$ 4" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 232.93$ 4" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 263.56$ 6" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 315.95$ 6" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 441.69$ 6" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 505.36$ 8" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 600.47$ 8" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 819.70$ 8" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/QD 929.32$ 2" - 6" Hose: 1 Powerlock Each End 8" Hose: 2 Powerlocks Each End 2" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 83.02$ 2" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 117.68$ 2" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 134.60$ 3" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 108.81$ 3" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 149.92$ 3" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 170.87$ 4" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 162.01$ 4" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 224.07$ 4" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 254.70$ 6" x 10' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 325.62$ 6" x 20' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 452.17$ 6" x 25' Kanaflex Kanaline SR w/Cam and Groove 515.03$ 2" - 6" Hose: 1 Powerlock Each End 2" x 50' Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 79.79$ 3" x 50' Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 117.68$ 4" x 50' Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 171.68$ 6" x 50' Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 367.54$ 8" x 50’ Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 580.32$ 2" - 6" Hose: 3 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 6" 8 " Hose: 2 Double Bolt Clamps Each End Kanaflex Kanaline SR (Clear w/Orange Helix), CG Fittings Blue PVC Discharge Hose, QD Fittings Kanaflex 300EPDM (Green & Black), CG Fittings Kanaflex Kanaline SR (Clear w/Orange Helix, QD Fittings All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 52 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description 1½" x 50’ Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 50.78$ 2" x 50' Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 66.09$ 3" x 50' Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 105.59$ 4" x 50' Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 153.14$ 6" x 50' Blue PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 303.06$ 1-1/2" - 4" Hose: 2 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 6" Hose: 3 Bands on Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 2" x 50' Gray PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 91.08$ 3" x 50' Gray PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 132.18$ 4" x 50' Gray PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 193.44$ 6" x 50' Gray PVC Discharge Hose w/QD 328.85$ 2" - 6" Hose: 3 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 2" x 50' Gray PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 77.38$ 3" x 50' Gray PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 120.09$ 4" x 50' Gray PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 174.90$ 6" x 50' Gray PVC Discharge Hose w/Cam and Groove 338.52$ 2" - 4" Hose: 2 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 2" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x QD 229.71$ 3" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x QD 334.49$ 4" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x QD 440.88$ 6" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x QD 706.86$ 8" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x QD 1,198.52$ 2" - 6" Hose: 2 Bands Each End and 1 Double Bolt Clamp Each End 8" Hose: 2 Double Bolt Clamps Each End 1½" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 191.83$ 2" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 222.46$ 3" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 329.65$ 4" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 432.02$ 6" x 50' Godwin Orange Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 716.53$ 1-1/2"-6" Hose: 2 Bands Each End and 1 Double Bolt Clamp Each End 2" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x QD 233.74$ 3" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x QD 323.21$ 4" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x QD 444.91$ 6" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x QD 740.71$ 8" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x QD 1,216.25$ 10" x 50’ 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x QD 1,656.33$ 12" x 50’ 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x QD 3,045.07$ 2" - 6" Hose: 2 Bands Each End and 1 Double Bolt Clamp Each End 8" - 12" Hose: 2 Double Bolt Clamps Each End 2" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 226.49$ 3" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 318.37$ 4" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 436.05$ 6" x 50' 4 Ply Black Rubber Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 750.39$ 2" - 6" Hose: 2 Bands Each End and 1 Double Bolt Clamp Each End Heavy Duty Black Rubber Discharge Hose, CG Fittings Goodyear Gray PVC Discharge Hose, CG Fittings Godwin Orange Discharge Hose, QD fittings Godwin Orange Discharge Hose, CG Fittings Heavy Duty Black Rubber Discharge Hose, QD Fittings Blue PVC Discharge Hose, CG Fittings Goodyear Gray PVC Discharge Hose, QD Fittings All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 53 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description 2" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x QD 116.87$ 3" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x QD 200.69$ 4" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x QD 257.92$ 6" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x QD 464.26$ 8" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x QD 855.97$ 2" - 6" Hose: 2 Bands Each End and 1 Double Bolt Clamp Each End 8" Hose: 2 Double Bolt Clamps Each End 1½" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 87.85$ 2" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 109.62$ 3" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 187.80$ 4" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 249.05$ 6" x 50' Ironsides Red Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 474.73$ 1-1/2" - 6" Hose: 2 Bands Each End and 1 Double Bolt Clamp Each End 2" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x QD 94.30$ 3" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x QD 138.63$ 4" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x QD 221.65$ 2" - 4" Hose: 2 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 1½" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 66.90$ 2" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 87.05$ 2½" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 116.87$ 3" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 134.60$ 4" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x Cam and Groove 212.78$ 1-1/2" - 4" Hose: 2 Bands on Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 1½" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x CAB Couplings 66.90$ 2" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x CAB Couplings 83.82$ 2½" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x CAB Couplings 108.81$ 3" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x CAB Couplings 131.38$ 4" x 50' White Mill Discharge Hose x CAB Couplings 206.34$ 1-1/2" - 4" Hose: 2 Bands Each End (Additional Adder if Double Bolt Clamps are required) 2" x 20' Crosslink Polyethylene Chemical Hose 312.73$ 3" x 20' Crosslink Polyethylene Chemical Hose 515.03$ 4" x 20' Crosslink Polyethylene Chemical Hose 778.60$ 6" x 20' Crosslink Polyethylene Chemical Hose 1,655.52$ 2" - 6" Hose: 1 Band and 1 Double Bolt Clamp Each End 3000 PSI Working Pressure 137.02$ 1/2" x 50' Hydraulic Hose x Hydraulic Couplers 4000 PSI Working Pressure 149.11$ 3/4" x 50' Hydraulic Hose x Wing Couplers 5000 PSI Working Pressure 471.51$ 1" x 50’ Hydraulic Hose x Wing Couplers 5000 PSI Working Pressure 552.11$ 1-1/4" x 50’ Hydraulic Hose x Wing Couplers 5000 PSI Working Pressure 1,140.49$ 3/4" x 50'-200 PSI Air Hose x Chicago Fittings 74.96$ 1/4" x 50' Hydraulic Hose x Hydraulic Couplers Single Jacket White Mill Discharge Hose, CG Fittings Single Jacket White Mill Discharge Hose, CAB Fittings Coupled Chemical Hose X S.S., CG Fittings Hydraulic Hose and Hydraulic Couplers Ironsides Red Discharge Hose, QD Fittings Ironsides Red Discharge Hose, CG Fittings Single Jacket White Mill Discharge Hose, QD Fittings Air Hose, Chicago Fittings All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 54 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description 4" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 225 PSI 530.35$ 4" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 225 PSI 990.57$ 6" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 225 PSI 812.45$ 6" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 225 PSI 1,349.24$ 8" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 225 PSI 1,420.17$ 8" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 225 PSI 1,857.83$ 10" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 200 PSI 2,087.54$ 10" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 200 PSI 2,650.13$ 12" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 200 PSI 2,285.01$ 12" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 200 PSI 3,358.60$ 4" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 885.79$ 4" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 1,181.60$ 6" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 1,284.76$ 6" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 1,683.73$ 8" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 1,860.25$ 8" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 2,538.09$ 10" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 2,483.29$ 10" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 3,490.79$ 12" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 3,049.90$ 12" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose - 300 PSI 4,370.94$ 4" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose 150 PSI 408.64$ 4" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose 150 PSI 639.16$ 6" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose 225 PSI 695.58$ 6" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose 225 PSI 1,296.05$ 8" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose 225 PSI 1,080.85$ 8" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose 225 PSI 1,723.23$ 10" x 10' Flanged OS&D Hose 200 PSI 1,974.70$ 10" x 20' Flanged OS&D Hose 200 PSI 2,974.14$ 1½"2.18$ 2"2.46$ 3"3.75$ 4"5.76$ 6"10.76$ 8"21.44$ 10"33.61$ 12"47.15$ 2"6.73$ 3"9.71$ 4"12.37$ 6"26.88$ 2" 9.79$ 3" 15.23$ 4" 20.84$ 6" 51.58$ 225 PSI Cargo OS&D HOSE, 150# Flange Fittings 300 PSI Cargo OS&D HOSE, 300# Flange Fittings Composite OS&D HOSE, Flanged Fittings 24 inches 24 inches 36 inches 36 inches Bend Radius 60 inches 60 inches 72 inches 72 inches 48 inches 48 inches 24 inches 24 inches Bend Radius 36 inches 36 inches 16 inches 16 inches 48 inches 48 inches 60 inches 60 inches Bend Radius 20 inches 20 inches 29 inches 29 inches WATER SUCTION HOSE (REGULAR BLACK) OIL SUCTION HOSE (RED STRIPE) CROSSLINK CHEMICAL S & D HOSE 36 inches 36 inches 72 inches 72 inches All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 55 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description 2"3.47$ 3"4.27$ 4"6.21$ 6"12.65$ 8"21.92$ 2"1.93$ 3"3.67$ 4"6.13$ 6"11.49$ 8"22.25$ 2"2.26$ 3"4.11$ 4"7.46$ 6"13.42$ Size Working Pressure 1½" 70 0.36$ 2" 65 0.48$ 3" 60 0.85$ 4" 60 1.17$ 6" 40 2.06$ 8" 40 3.83$ Size Working Pressure 2" 60 0.73$ 3" 50 1.17$ 4" 45 1.41$ 6" 35 2.78$ Size Working Pressure 1½" 200 0.85$ 2" 175 1.05$ 3" 150 2.06$ 4" 125 2.62$ 6" 115 5.00$ 8" 70 9.35$ Size Working Pressure 1-1/2" 400 2.86$ 2" 400 3.30$ 3" 300 4.92$ 4" 250 6.29$ 6" 150 9.83$ 8" 150 16.20$ KANAFLEX 300 EDPM (GREEN & BLACK) BLUE PVC (300 FOOT ROLL) GOODYEAR GRAY PVC (300 FOOT ROLL) KANAFLEX KANALINE SR (CLEAR W/ORANGE HELIX) KANAFLEX 110 GR PLAIN SOLID GREEN IRONSIDE RED PVC (300 FOOT ROLL) GODWIN STD ORANGE (50 FOOT ROLL) All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 56 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description Size Working Pressure 2" 4 Ply 150 3.39$ 3" 4 Ply 150 4.67$ 4" 4 Ply 150 6.37$ 6" 4 Ply 150 10.52$ 8" 4 Ply 100 16.56$ 10" 4 Ply 100 23.66$ 12" 4 Ply 100 46.59$ Size Working Pressure 1-1/2" 150 0.69$ 2" 150 0.93$ 2-1/2" 150 1.21$ 3" 150 1.45$ 4" 150 2.38$ QD SHANK COUPLINGS (COMPLETE SETS) 2" 100-6774 35.46$ 3" 100-6772 50.78$ 4¼" 100-6768 83.82$ 6" 100-6765 153.14$ 8" 100-6764 270.01$ 10" 100-6769 245.02$ 12" 100-6770 459.42$ FLANGED QD COUPLINGS 4" x Ball 100-6987 116.06$ 4" x Socket 100-6986 85.44$ 6" x Ball 100-7005 240.19$ 6" x Socket 100-7004 178.93$ 8" x Ball 100-7003 344.97$ 8" x Socket 100-7002 255.50$ 10" x Ball 110-7002 346.58$ 10" x Socket 110-7003 354.64$ 12" x Ball 112-7002 515.84$ 12" x Socket 112-7003 556.14$ CAM AND GROOVE ALUMINUM SHANK COUPLINGS(COMPLETE SETS) 1½" 15CAL/15EAL 22.53$ 2" 20CAL/20EAL 28.25$ 2½" 25CAL/25EAL 43.04$ 3" 30CAL/30EAL 46.39$ 4" 40CAL/40EAL 74.96$ 6" 60CAL/60EAL 163.05$ CAM AND GROOVE STAINLESS SHANK COUPLINGS (COMPLETE SETS) 1½" 15CSS/15ESS 86.24$ 2" 20CSS/20ESS 94.10$ 2½" 25CSS/25ESS 188.00$ 3" 30CSS/30ESS 178.77$ 4" 40CSS/40ESS 322.04$ 6" 60CSS/60ESS 579.76$ FLANGED ALUMINUM CAM AND GROOVE (COMPLETE SETS) 2" 20FLAAL/20FLBAL 102.85$ 3" 30FLAAL/30FLBAL 151.49$ 4" 40FLAAL/40FLBAL 216.81$ 6" 60FLAAL/60FLBAL 347.10$ HEAVY DUTY BLACK RUBBER DISCHARGE HOSE SINGLE JACKET WHITE MILL DISCHARGE HOSE COUPLINGS All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 57 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description DIXON STEEL KING SHANK COUPLINGS (COMPLETE SETS) 1½" CSM150 21.92$ 2" CSM200 25.23$ 2½" CSM250 35.18$ 3" CSM300 43.12$ 4" CSM400 68.47$ 6" CSM600 147.54$ SUCTION SCREENS WITH SQUARE HOLE SQO150 1½" x Female NPT 13.90$ SQO200 2" x Female NPT 12.73$ SQO250 2½" x Female NPT 20.47$ SQO300 3" x Female NPT 20.43$ SQO400 4" x Female NPT 28.17$ SQO600-2.5 6" x Female NPT 73.35$ SQO800 8" x Female NPT 167.65$ SQO1000 10" x Flange (Fabricated)406.22$ SQO1200 12" x Flange (Fabricated)537.60$ FLANGED COMBINATION NIPPLE 4" Flanged Combination Nipple 117.68$ 6" Flanged Combination Nipple 179.74$ 8" Flanged Combination Nipple 229.71$ 10" Flanged Combination Nipple 337.71$ 12" Flanged Combination Nipple 440.88$ Above items consist of slip on flange, combination nipple and welding. QD VENT PIPE ASSEMBLIES 4" QD Vent 452.17$ 6" QD Vent 503.75$ 8" QD Vent 573.87$ 10" QD Vent 848.19$ 12" QD Vent 1,019.87$ DOUBLE BOLT CLAMPS DL14 1½" Suction & Discharge 7.09$ DL32 2" Suction & Discharge 8.10$ 400 3" Suction & Discharge 11.53$ 463 4" Discharge 12.29$ 525 4" Suction 15.27$ 675 6" Discharge 18.66$ 769 6" Suction 20.67$ 875 8" Discharge 29.74$ 988 8" Suction 36.55$ 1125 10" Suction & Discharge 57.35$ 1275 12" Discharge 64.20$ 1360 12" Suction 103.01$ POWERLOCK CLAMPS Powerlock 2 Kanaflex 2" Clamp 9.79$ Powerlock 3 Kanaflex 3" Clamp 10.56$ Powerlock 4 Kanaflex 4" Clamp 12.57$ Powerlock 6 Kanaflex 6" Clamp 18.14$ Powerlock 8 Kanaflex 8" Clamp 27.77$ Powerlock 10 Kanaflex 10" Clamp 52.35$ Powerlock 12 Kanaflex 12" Clamp 69.24$ MISCELLANEOUS FITTINGS Suction Screens COUPLINGS (continued) Includes QD Vent Pipe, Pipe Nipple and AG400 Vent All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 58 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description STAINLESS STEEL BANDS KS8 2" Stainless Bands 2.54$ KS12 3" Stainless Bands 3.39$ KS16 4" Stainless Bands 4.11$ KS20 5" Stainless Bands 4.07$ KS28 7" Stainless Bands 6.21$ QD One Piece Screens 2" QD Low Profile Screen 200-9876 62.06$ 3" QD Low Profile Screen 200-9877 92.69$ 4-1/4" QD Low Profile Screen 200-9874 109.62$ 6" QD Low Profile Screen 200-9873 169.26$ 8" QD Low Profile Screen 200-9878 282.10$ 10" QD Low Profile Screen 200-9879 209.56$ 12" QD Low Profile Screen 200-9880 338.52$ Cam and Groove x Screen 2" Male Cam and Groove X Screen 22.73$ 2" Female Cam and Groove X Screen 34.66$ 3" Male Cam and Groove X Screen 39.90$ 3" Female Cam and Groove X Screen 63.47$ 4" Male Cam and Groove X Screen 63.67$ 4" Female Cam and Groove X Screen 90.07$ 6" Male Cam and Groove X Screen 152.70$ 6" Female Cam and Groove X Screen 232.81$ QD x Screen 2" Male QD X Screen 45.14$ 2" Female QD X Screen 35.30$ 3" Male QD X Screen 103.17$ 3" Female QD X Screen 62.34$ 4-1/4 " Male QD X Screen 106.39$ 4-1/4" Female QD X Screen 80.56$ 6" Male QD X Screen 230.52$ 6" Female QD X Screen 175.71$ 8" Male QD X Screen 408.64$ 8" Female QD X Screen 364.31$ FLANGED 150# CHECK VALVES (WITH RUBBER FLAPPERS) GPV3-150 3" Flanged Check Valve 301.44$ GPV4-150 4" Flanged Check Valve 350.61$ GPV6-150 6" Flanged Check Valve 555.33$ GPV8-150 8" Flanged Check Valve 886.60$ GPV10-150 10" Flanged Check Valve 1,589.43$ GPV12-150 12" Flanged Check Valve 2,414.78$ GPV18-150 18" Flanged Check Valve 7,359.59$ FLANGED 300# CHECK VALVES (WITH RUBBER FLAPPERS) GPV3-300 3" Flanged Check Valve 744.74$ GPV4-300 4" Flanged Check Valve 714.12$ GPV6-300 6" Flanged Check Valve 1,254.14$ SQUARE HOLE SUCTION SCREENS ASSEMBLY PRICE LIST (Assembled from Individual Components) CHECK VALVES MISCELLANEOUS FITTINGS (Continued) All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 59 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 GSA PRICE CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY Description FLANGE SIZE QTY 3" Flange 4 5.32$ 4" Flange 8 11.61$ 6" Flange 8 19.67$ 8" Flange 8 19.67$ 10" Flange 12 31.43$ 12" Flange 12 31.43$ 14" Flange 12 53.68$ 16" Flange 16 94.79$ 18" Flange 16 203.76$ FLANGE SIZE QTY Bolt Size 2" 150# Flange 4 5/8" x 4"9.35$ 3" 150# Flange 4 5/8" x 4"9.35$ 4" 150# Flange 8 5/8" x 4"18.70$ 6" 150# Flange 8 3/4" x 4-1/2" 24.50$ 8" 150# Flange 8 3/4" x 4-1/2" 24.50$ 10" 150# Flange 12 7/8" x 4-1/2" 52.71$ 12" 150# Flange 12 7/8" x 4-1/2" 52.71$ 14" 150# Flange 12 1" x 9"147.01$ 16" 150# Flange 16 1" x 9"196.02$ 18" 150# Flange 16 1-1/8" x 9" 236.00$ 20" 150# Flange 20 1-1/8" x 9" 295.00$ 4" HDPE x 4" HDPE 8 5/8" x 4-1/2" 19.99$ 6" - 8" HDPE x HDPE 8 3/4" x 8"56.42$ 10" - 12" HDPE x HDPE 12 7/8" x 9"98.65$ 14" HDPE x HDPE 12 1" x 9"147.01$ 16" HDPE x HDPE 16 1" x 9"196.02$ 18" HDPE x HDPE 16 1-1/8" x 11" 259.85$ 20" HDPE x HDPE 20 1-1/8" x 11" 324.82$ 4" 150# Steel x 4" 150# HDPE 8 5/8" x 4"18.70$ 6" 150# Steel x 6" 150# HDPE 8 3/4" x 8"56.42$ 8" 150# Steel x 8" 150# HDPE 8 3/4" x 8"56.42$ 10" 150# Steel x 10" 150# HDPE 12 7/8" x 9"98.65$ 12" 150# Steel x 12" 150# HDPE 12 7/8" x 9"98.65$ 14" 150# Steel x 14" 150# HDPE 12 1" x 9"147.01$ 16" 150# Steel x 14" 150# HDPE 16 1" x 9"196.02$ 18" 150# Steel x 18" 150# HDPE 16 1-1/8" x 9" 236.00$ 20" 150# Steel x 20" 150# HDPE 20 1-1/8" x 11" 324.82$ Non Galvanized used for 18" Knife Valves 16 1-1/8"-7 x 9" 266.30$ HDPE FLANGED NUT & STUD KITS HDPE STANDARD FLANGED NUT & BOLT KITS 3/4" X 3½" 3/4" X 3½" 3/4" X 4" 3/4" X 4" 7/8" X 5" 1-1/8" X 5" 1" X 5" Bolt Size 5/8" X 3" 5/8" X 3½" All prices listed in US Dollars and are subject to change without notice Attachment number 1 Page 60 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Part Number Description GSA Price G210-14 1-1/2" Gate Valve 20.15$ 100-6943 2" 45 Degree Godwin QD Elbow 40.30$ 101-1201 2" 60 Degree Godwin QD Elbow 40.30$ 101-1101 2" 90 Degree Godwin QD Elbow 40.30$ AG200 2" Air Vent 44.33$ 101-0183 2" Female Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 3.22$ 100-6969 2" Female Godwin QD X 2" FLA 58.84$ 100-6657 2" Female Godwin QD X Female NPT 37.08$ 101-0511 2" Female Godwin QD X Male NPT 20.15$ 101-0711 2" Female Godwin QD X Shank 10.48$ 101-0201 2" Godwin QD End Cap 5.64$ 101-1901 2" Godwin QD End Tee 71.73$ 101-0134 2" Godwin QD Lever 12.09$ 101-1701 2" Godwin QD Line Tee 71.73$ 200-9876 2" Godwin QD Low Profile Screen 62.06$ 101-0140 2" Godwin QD O-ring 2.42$ 200-0876 2" Godwin QD Round Hole Screen 45.14$ 100-6774 2" Godwin QD Shank Set 35.46$ 100-6555 2" Godwin QD Wye 124.93$ 100-0192 2" Male Godwin QD x 1.5" Male NPT Elbow 38.69$ 101-0182 2" Male Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 3.22$ 100-6955 2" Male Godwin QD PLUG WITH 19.34$ 100-6971 2" Male Godwin QD X 2" FLANG 67.70$ 100-6662 2" Male Godwin QD X Female NPT 45.14$ 101-0811 2" Male Godwin QD X Male NPT 20.15$ 101-1011 2" Male Godwin QD X Shank 10.48$ 101-0141 2" Oil Proof O-ring 4.03$ 101-0132 2" QD Galvanized Weld Neck 4.84$ 101-0133 2" QD Galvanized.Weld Neck Female 4.84$ 100-6998 2" QD RISER ADAPTOR 27.40$ 200-5876 2" Square Hole Screen 45.14$ 101-1601 2" X 3" Godwin QD Increaser 43.52$ 100-7001 2"MALE QD X 1.5"Shank 40.30$ CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY 2" Fittings Attachment number 1 Page 61 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Part Number Description GSA Price CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY 2" Fittings 100-7079 3" 45 Degree Godwin QD Elbow 51.58$ AG300 3" Air Vent 98.33$ 103-0201 3" End Cap 11.28$ 109-0183 3" Female Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 4.03$ 109-0133 3" Female Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck 5.64$ 100-6968 3" Female Godwin QD X 3" FLA 83.82$ 109-0521 3" Female Godwin QD X 3" Male NPT 38.69$ 100-6656 3" Female Godwin QD X Female NPT 62.06$ 109-0711 3" Female Godwin QD X Shank 14.51$ 109-1901 3" Godwin QD End Tee 89.47$ 103-0134 3" Godwin QD Lever 18.54$ 109-1701 3" Godwin QD Line Tee 89.47$ 200-9877 3" Godwin QD Low Profile Screen 92.69$ 103-0140 3" Godwin QD O-ring 3.22$ 100-6552 3" Godwin QD Outlet Tee 102.36$ 100-7052 3" Godwin QD Plug with Lever 26.60$ 200-0877 3" Godwin QD Round Hole Screen 103.17$ 100-6772 3" Godwin QD Shank Set 50.78$ 109-1501 3" Godwin QD Step Bow 104.78$ 100-6554 3" Godwin QD Wye 170.07$ 109-0182 3" Male Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 4.03$ 109-0132 3" Male Godwin QD Galvanizedanzied Weld Neck 5.64$ 100-6970 3" Male Godwin QD X 3" FLANG 96.72$ 109-0820 3" Male Godwin QD X 3" Male NPT 63.67$ 100-6661 3" Male Godwin QD X Female NPT 74.96$ 109-1011 3" Male Godwin QD X Shank 14.51$ 103-0141 3" Oil Proof O-ring 4.84$ 200-5877 3" Square Hole Screen 103.17$ 103-2701 3" X 2" Godwin QD Reducer 40.30$ 100-9160 3" X 4-1/4" Godwin QD Increaser 78.18$ 3" Fittings Attachment number 1 Page 62 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Part Number Description GSA Price CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY 2" Fittings AG400 4" Air Vent 162.81$ 100-6362 4" Critical Silence Flange x 4" Female Godwin QD 137.02$ 100-6363 4" Critical Silence Flange x 4" Male Godwin QD 139.44$ 100-7469 4-1/4" 45 Degree Godwin QD Elbow 87.05$ 100-6986 4-1/4" Female Godwin QD X 4"85.44$ 105-0511 4-1/4" Female Godwin QD X 4" Male NPT 48.36$ 100-6654 4-1/4" Female Godwin QD X FE 78.18$ 105-0711 4-1/4" Female Godwin QD x Shank 24.99$ 105-0132 4-1/4" Galvanized Weld Neck 12.90$ 105-0133 4-1/4" Galvanized Weld Neck 13.70$ 105-1201 4-1/4" Godwin QD 60 Degree Elbow 87.05$ 105-1101 4-1/4" Godwin QD 90 Degree Elbow 87.05$ 105-0182 4-1/4" Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 7.25$ 105-0183 4-1/4" Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 7.25$ 105-0201 4-1/4" Godwin QD End Cap 16.12$ 105-1901 4-1/4" Godwin QD End Tee 149.92$ 105-0134 4-1/4" Godwin QD Lever 29.82$ 105-1701 4-1/4" Godwin QD Line Tee 149.92$ 200-9874 4-1/4" Godwin QD Low Profile 109.62$ 105-0140 4-1/4" Godwin QD O-ring 4.03$ 105-1805 4-1/4" Godwin QD Outlet Tee 122.51$ 100-7057 4-1/4" Godwin QD Plug with Lever 37.08$ 200-0874 4-1/4" Godwin QD Round Hole Screen 106.39$ 100-6768 4-1/4" Godwin QD Shank Set 83.82$ 200-5874 4-1/4" Godwin QD Square Hole 106.39$ 105-1501 4-1/4" Godwin QD Step Bow 252.28$ 100-6813 4-1/4" Godwin QD Vent Pipe 268.40$ 105-0811 4-1/4" Male Godwin QD X 4" Male Thread 47.55$ 100-6659 4-1/4" Male Godwin QD X FE/N 78.18$ 100-6987 4-1/4" Male Godwin QD X FLAN 116.06$ 105-1011 4-1/4" Male Godwin QD X SHAN 24.99$ 100-6819 4-1/4" MALE X FLANGE 171.68$ 105-0141 4-1/4" Oil Proof O-ring 8.87$ 100-6708 4-1/4" QD FXFXM Y 289.35$ 105-0113 4-1/4" X 10' Godwin QD Pipe 164.42$ 105-0116 4-1/4" X 20' Godwin QD Pipe 187.80$ 105-0111 4-1/4" X 3' Godwin QD Pipe 124.93$ 105-2711 4-1/4" X 3" Godwin QD Reducer 70.12$ 105-0112 4-1/4" X 6' Godwin QD Pipe 145.08$ 105-1601 4-1/4" X 6" Godwin QD Increaser 130.57$ 4" Fittings Attachment number 1 Page 63 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Part Number Description GSA Price CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY 2" Fittings 100-7468 6" 45 Degree Godwin QD Elbow 245.83$ 100-7020 6" Critical Silence Flange x 6" Female Godwin QD 187.80$ 100-6377 6" Critical Silence Flange x 6" Male Godwin Q.D.230.52$ 107-0511 6" Female Godwin Godwin QD X Male NPT 95.91$ 107-0711 6" Female Godwin Godwin QD X Shank 42.72$ 107-0183 6" Female Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 13.70$ 100-6653 6" Female Godwin QD X Female NPT 175.71$ 100-7004 6" Flange x 6" Female Godwin Q.D.178.93$ 100-7005 6" Flange x 6" Male Godwin QD 240.19$ 107-1201 6" Godwin QD 60 Degree Elbow 245.83$ 107-1101 6" Godwin QD 90 Degree Elbow 245.83$ 107-0201 6" Godwin QD End CAP 26.60$ 107-1901 6" Godwin QD End Tee 282.10$ 107-0132 6" Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck 21.76$ 107-0133 6" Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck 24.99$ 106-0134 6" Godwin QD Lever 61.26$ 107-1701 6" Godwin QD Line Tee 282.10$ 200-9873 6" Godwin QD Low Profile Screen 169.26$ 107-0140 6" Godwin QD O-ring 6.45$ 107-1805 6" Godwin QD Outlet Tee 245.83$ 100-7056 6" Godwin QD Plug with Lever 65.29$ 200-0873 6" Godwin QD Round Hole Screen 230.52$ 100-6765 6" Godwin QD Shank Set 153.14$ 200-5873 6" Godwin QD Square Hole Screen 230.52$ 107-1501 6" Godwin QD Step Bow 436.05$ 100-6812 6" Godwin QD Vent Pipe 319.98$ 107-0182 6" Male Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 11.28$ 100-6658 6" Male Godwin QD X Female NPT 224.87$ 107-0811 6" Male Godwin QD X Male NPT 95.91$ 107-1011 6" Male Godwin QD X Shank 42.72$ 100-6818 6" MALE X FLANGE ELBO 267.59$ 107-0141 6" Oil Proof O-ring 16.12$ 100-6707 6" QD FXFXM Y 496.50$ 100-6922 6" X 10' Godwin QD Header Pipe 419.93$ 107-0113 6" X 10' Godwin QD Pipe 270.01$ 107-0116 6" X 20' Godwin QD Pipe 324.82$ 107-0111 6" X 3' Godwin QD Pipe 203.11$ 107-0112 6" X 6' Godwin QD Pipe 236.96$ 107-1601 6" X 8" Godwin QD Increaser 236.96$ 6" Fittings Attachment number 1 Page 64 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Part Number Description GSA Price CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY 2" Fittings 100-6640 8" 45 Degree Godwin QD Elbow 342.55$ 100-7018 8" Critical Silence Flange x 8" Female Godwin QD 261.95$ 108-0511 8" Female Godwin Godwin QD X Male NPT 187.80$ 108-0711 8" Female Godwin Godwin QD X Shank 83.82$ 100-6776 8" Female Godwin QD X 10" FL 382.04$ 100-6900 8" Female Godwin QD X 6" FLA 193.44$ 100-7002 8" Female Godwin QD X FLANGE 255.50$ 100-7003 8" Flange x 8" Male Godwin QD 344.97$ 100-6563 8" Godwin Female x 8" Female NPT 330.46$ 108-1201 8" Godwin QD 60 Degree Elbow 342.55$ 108-1101 8" Godwin QD 90 Degree Elbow 342.55$ 108-0201 8" Godwin QD End Cap 58.03$ 108-1901 8" Godwin QD End Tee 463.45$ 108-0132 8" Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck 36.27$ 108-0133 8" Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck Female 39.49$ 108-0134 8" Godwin QD Lever 93.50$ 108-0140 8" Godwin QD O-RING 8.87$ 108-1805 8" Godwin QD Outlet Tee 562.59$ 100-7053 8" Godwin QD Plug with Lever 108.00$ 200-0878 8" Godwin QD Round Hole Screen 419.12$ 100-6764 8" Godwin QD Shank Set 270.01$ 200-5878 8" Godwin QD Square Hole Screen 408.64$ 200-9878 8" Godwin QD Square Hole Screen 282.10$ 108-1501 8" Godwin QD Step Bow 600.47$ 100-6811 8" Godwin QD Vent Pipe 390.10$ 108-0811 8" Male Godwin Godwin QD X Male NPT 147.50$ 108-1011 8" Male Godwin Godwin QD X Shank 83.82$ 108-0182 8" Male Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 21.76$ 100-6777 8" Male Godwin QD X 10" FLAN 473.12$ 100-6901 8" Male Godwin QD X 6" FLANG 302.25$ 100-6565 8" Male Godwin QD X Female NPT 423.96$ 100-6817 8" MALE X FLANGE ELBO 508.59$ 108-0141 8" Oil Proof O-ring 22.57$ 100-6706 8" QD FXFXM Y 689.94$ 108-0113 8" X 10' Godwin QD Pipe 411.06$ 108-1601 8" X 10" Godwin QD Increaser 216.01$ 100-6946 8" X 20' Godwin QD Header Pipe 693.16$ 108-0116 8" X 20' Godwin QD Pipe 464.26$ 108-0111 8" X 3' Godwin QD Pipe 309.50$ 108-0112 8" X 6' Godwin QD Pipe 357.06$ 108-2701 8" X 6" Godwin QD Reducer 197.47$ 8" Fittings Attachment number 1 Page 65 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Part Number Description GSA Price CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY 2" Fittings 110-7003 10" Female Godwin Godwin QD X Flange 354.64$ 110-0711 10" Female Godwin Godwin QD X Shank 128.96$ 110-0183 10" Female Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 47.55$ 110-0133 10" Female Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck 88.66$ 200-9879 10" Female Godwin QD Screen 209.56$ 110-6640 10" Godwin QD 45 Degree Elbow 334.49$ 110-1101 10" Godwin QD 90 Degree Elbow 338.52$ 110-0201 10" Godwin QD End CAP 133.80$ 110-4401 10" Godwin QD End Plug 156.36$ 110-1901 10" Godwin QD End Tee 749.58$ 110-1701 10" Godwin QD Line Tee 511.81$ 110-0140 10" Godwin QD O-ring 12.09$ 110-1805 10" Godwin QD Outlet Tee 652.86$ 100-6769 10" Godwin QD Shank Set 245.02$ 110-1501 10" Godwin QD Step Bow 822.12$ 100-6810 10" Godwin QD Vent Pipe 664.95$ 110-7002 10" Male Godwin Godwin QD X Flange 346.58$ 110-0182 10" Male Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 52.39$ 110-0132 10" Male Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck 80.60$ 100-6710 10" QD FXFXM Y 910.78$ 110-0113 10" X 10' Godwin QD Pipe 556.14$ 110-1601 10" X 12" Godwin QD Increaser 378.82$ 112-6640 12" 45 Degree Godwin QD 45 Elbow 548.08$ 112-1101 12" 90 Degree Godwin QD Elbow 548.08$ 112-7003 12" Female Godwin Godwin QD X Flange 556.14$ 112-0711 12" Female Godwin Godwin QD X Shank 274.04$ 112-0183 12" Female Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 137.02$ 112-0133 12" Female Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck 221.65$ 200-9880 12" Female Godwin QD Screen 338.52$ 112-0201 12" Godwin QD End Cap 254.70$ 112-4401 12" Godwin QD End Plug 282.10$ 112-1901 12" Godwin QD End Tee 1,080.04$ 112-1701 12" Godwin QD Line Tee 1,007.50$ 112-0140 12" Godwin QD O-ring 13.70$ 112-1805 12" Godwin QD Outlet Tee 1,015.56$ 100-6770 12" Godwin QD Shank Set 459.42$ 112-1501 12" Godwin QD Step Bow 1,354.08$ 100-6809 12" Godwin QD Vent Pipe 836.63$ 112-7002 12" Male Godwin Godwin QD X Flange 515.84$ 112-1011 12" Male Godwin Godwin QD X Shank 225.68$ 112-0182 12" Male Godwin QD Black Weld Neck 90.27$ 112-0132 12" Male Godwin QD Galvanized Weld Neck 183.77$ 100-6712F 12" QD FXFXM Y 1,281.54$ 112-0113 12" X 10' Godwin QD PIPE 685.10$ 112-2701 12" X 10" Godwin QD Reducer 386.88$ 12" Fittings 10" Fittings Attachment number 1 Page 66 of 67 Item # 31 Effective 5/1/07 - 3/31/12 Modified AO14 Approved 3/6/09 Part Number Description GSA Price CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY 2" Fittings 100-90SW 90 Degree Swing Arm Assembly 135.41$ 100-6959 Godwin QD Jet Bend 104.78$ 100-9150 Wellpoint 124.93$ Wellpoint Attachment number 1 Page 67 of 67 Item # 31 Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 31 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Contract Award of Bid Package #2 (100% Construction) for the Reynolds Street Parking Deck Department:Public Services Department - Facilities Management Division Caption:Motion to approve the authorization for R.J. Griffin to award Bid Package #2, in the amount of $2,066,200.00, which includes all disciplines not covered in Bid Package #1 for the new Reynolds Street Parking Deck and set the GMP for the project at $6,852,006.00. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:R.J. Griffin was selected to be the Construction Manager @ Risk under Bid Item #10-039 for the Reynolds Street Parking Deck. The Design team, led by TVS and Studio 3 completed 100% construction documents and bids were accepted and reviewed by R.J. Griffin, under the observation of the Procurement Department and the Capital Improvements Program Management organization. Analysis:R.J. Griffin, in conjunction with the design and program management team, will provide oversight during this and subsequent phases of the project. Proceeding with this work now will allow construction to proceed in an expedited fashion, leading to quicker completion of the new Reynolds Street Parking Deck. Financial Impact:The amount for Bid Package #2 ($2,066,200.00) is a component of the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), which is established in conjunction with Bid Package #1. This bid package establishes the GMP at a total of $6,852,006.00. Alternatives:1. Provide authorization to R.J. Griffin to award Bid Package #2, in the amount of $2,066,200.00, which includes all disciplines not covered in Bid Package #1 for the new Reynolds Street Parking Deck and set the GMP for the project at $6,852,006.00. 2. Do not approve the authorization. Recommendation:Provide authorization to R.J. Griffin to award Bid Package #2, in the amount of $2,066,200.00, which includes all disciplines not covered in Bid Package #1 for the new Reynolds Street Parking Deck and set the GMP for the project at $6,852,006.00. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN ACCOUNT: GL – 325051130 JL 206351102 Cover Memo Item # 32 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 5 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 6 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 7 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 8 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 9 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 10 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 11 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 12 of 13 Item # 32 Attachment number 1 Page 13 of 13 Item # 32 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Forest Place, Phases 2-A and 2-B Department:Augusta Utilities Department Caption:Motion to approve and accept a Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Forest Place, Phases 2-A and 2-B. (Approved by Engneering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:Sibley Development, LLC, has developed a subdivision known as Forest Place, Phases 2-A and 2-B, and they wish to dedicate the water distribution and gravity sanitary sewer systems to Augusta. Analysis:The water distribution and gravity sanitary sewer systems have been inspected by the Augusta Utilities Department and both have passed. Financial Impact:None Alternatives:Deny the motion to approve and accept the Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Forest Place, Phases 2-A and 2-B. Recommendation:Approve the motion to approve and accept the Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Forest Place, Phases 2-A and 2-B. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: N/A REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 33 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 8 Item # 33 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 8 Item # 33 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 8 Item # 33 Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 8 Item # 33 Attachment number 1 Page 5 of 8 Item # 33 Attachment number 1 Page 6 of 8 Item # 33 Attachment number 1 Page 7 of 8 Item # 33 Attachment number 1 Page 8 of 8 Item # 33 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Department:Engineering/Traffic Caption:Motion to approve award of the Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $104,660. Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:In June 2009, Augusta-Richmond County applied for and had approved an application for formula-based grants from the United States Department of Energy as part of the American Recovery and Revitalization Act of 2009 (ARRA, aka “Stimulus”). The intent of the grant is to fund projects that reduce greenhouse emissions through energy savings. One of the approved projects for this grant was the installation of Adaptive Traffic Control System at the existing traffic signals at Fort Gordon Gates 1 and 2. The proposed adaptive traffic control system will utilize state-of-the-art sensor technology, image processing, and artificial intelligence to automatically optimize local traffic signals and provide coordination for the arterial according to real-time traffic demand, thus, eliminating the need for static signal timing and coordination plans. Installation will result in reduced travel times and fuel usage for the general motoring public in the Fort Gordon area. Analysis:Bids were received on July 9, 2010 with B and E Electrical being the lowest compliant bidder. Vendor Bid B & E Electrical $104,660.00 It is the recommendation of the Engineering Department, Traffic Engineering Section to award this project to the low bidder, B & E Electrical subject to receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. Financial Impact:Funding is available ARRA ($60,000) and account number 272-041710- 541610 ($44,660) upon Commission approval. Alternatives:1) Approve Award of the Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $104,660. Award will be contingent on receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. 2) Do not approve. Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: ARRA 220-016310-5425310($60,000) & 272-041710-541610 ($44,660) Cover Memo Item # 34 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 34 Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia BE IT ORDAINED by the Commission-Council of Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia that the following Capital Project Budget is hereby amended: Section 1: Approve Award of the Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $104,660. Award will be contingent on receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. One of the approved projects for this grant was replace the installation of Adaptive Traffic Control System at the existing traffic Section 2: The following revenues are anticipated to be available to the Consolidated Government to complete the project. ARRA 60,000$ Capital Outlay 44,660$ 104,660$ Section 3: The following amounts are appropriated for the project: Section 4: Copies of this Capital Project Budget shall be made available to the Comptroller for direction in carrying out this project. Adopted this ____________________ day of ______________________. Approved _________________________________________________ Original-Commission Council Office Copy-Engineering Department Copy-Finance Department Copy-Procurement Department Honorable Deke Copenhaver, Mayor CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System –Bid Item #10-137 CPB#N/A signals at Fort Gordon Gates 1 and 2. 9.2.2010 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 34 Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System –Bid Item #10-137 CPB#N/A CPB AMOUNT CPB NEW SOURCE OF FUNDS CPB CHANGE CPB ARRA $60,000 $0 $60,000 CAPITAL $44,660 TOTAL SOURCES: $104,660 $0 $60,000 USE OF FUNDS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 272-041710-14610 $104,660 $104,660 TOTAL USES: $104,660 $0 $104,660 9.2.2010 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 34 Invitation To Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until 11:00 a.m. Friday, July 9, 2010 for furnishing: Bid Item #10-135 Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bid Item #10-136 Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bid Item #10-137 Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 706-821-2422 Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. A Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference will be held on Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 10:00 a.m. in the Procurement Department – Room 605. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. All questions are to be submitted in writing by Tuesday, June 22, 2010 by 5:00 p.m. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference on an eligible local project, the certification statement as a local bidder and all supporting documents must be submitted to the Procurement Department with your bonafide bid package. No Bid may be withdrawn for a period of 90 days after time has been called on the date of opening. A 10% Bid bond is required to be submitted along with the bidders’ qualifications; a 100% performance bond and a 100% payment bond will be required for award. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia does not operate a DBE, MBE or WBE Program but rather pursuant to its code of ordinances, this local government operates instead a Local Small Business Opportunity Program. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle May 27, June 3, 10, 17, 2010 Metro Courier June 2, 2010 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Abie Ladson Engineering Department Hameed Malik Engineering Department Steve Cassell Traffic Engineering Department Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 34 Ve n d o r s : SI E M E N S 54 0 5 M E T R I C P L A C E NO R C R O S S , G A 3 0 0 9 2 RH Y T H M E N G I N E E R I N G 10 1 C Y P R E S S P O I N T HE N D E R S O N V I L L E , N C 28 7 3 9 B & E E L E C T R I C A L 61 3 6 C O L U M B I A R O A D GR O V E T O W N , G A 3 0 8 1 3 MI D A S C O , L L C 50 0 A B B E Y C O U R T AL P H A R E T T A , G A 30 0 0 4 OL H I N C . 10 0 5 B R O A D S T R E E T , SU I T E 1 0 0 AU G U S T A , G A 3 0 9 0 1 At t a c h m e n t B Ye s Y e s Bi d B o n d Ye s Y e s Ad d e n d u m 1 Ye s Y e s Bi d A m o u n t No n - C o m p l i a n t Bi d d e d Eq u i p m e n t O n l y $1 0 4 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 3 7 Go r d o n H i g h w a y A d a p t i v e T r a f f i c C o n t r o l S y s t e m Fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - E n g i n e e r i n g Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : F r i d a y , J u l y 9 , 2 0 1 0 a t 1 1 : 0 0 a . m . Pa g e 1 o f 1 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 1 Item # 34 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 1 Item # 34 Attachment number 5 Page 1 of 1 Item # 34 Attachment number 6 Page 1 of 3 Item # 34 Attachment number 6 Page 2 of 3 Item # 34 Attachment number 6 Page 3 of 3 Item # 34 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Hopetown Villas, Phase II Department:Augusta Utilities Department Caption:Motion to approve and accept a Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Hopetown Villas, Phase II. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:Adams Brothers Properties, LLC, developed a subdivision known as Hopetown Villas, Phase II and wish to dedicate the water and gravity sanitary sewer systems to Augusta. Analysis:Both the water and gravity sanitary sewer systems have been inspected by the Augusta Utilities Department and have passed. Financial Impact:None Alternatives:Deny the motion to approve and accept a Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Hopetown Villas, Phase II. Recommendation:Approve the motion to approve and accept a Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Hopetown Villas, Phase II. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: N/A REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 35 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 35 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 35 Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 2 Item # 35 Attachment number 2 Page 2 of 2 Item # 35 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 4 Item # 35 Attachment number 3 Page 2 of 4 Item # 35 Attachment number 3 Page 3 of 4 Item # 35 Attachment number 3 Page 4 of 4 Item # 35 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM LED Replacement Project Department:Engineering/Traffic Caption:Motion to approve award of the Light Emission Diode (LED) Module Replacement Project to Republic I.T.S in the amount of $109,822. Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:In June 2009, Augusta-Richmond County applied for and had approved an application for formula-based grants from the United States Department of Energy as part of the American Recovery and Revitalization Act of 2009 (ARRA, aka “Stimulus”). The intent of the grant is to fund projects that reduce greenhouse emissions through energy savings. One of the approved projects for this grant was to replace the existing incandescent signal heads with LED signal heads at 71 intersections. This conversion is expected to reduce county-wide energy consumption by approximately 730,000 kwh per year; translating to annual savings of more than $35,000. Analysis:Bids were received on July 22, 2010 with Republic ITS being the lowest compliant bidder. Vendors: Bid Republic I.T.S $109,822.00 B&E Electrical $149,823.52 Metro Power $199,532.00 Midasco, LLC $214,843.00 World Fiber $218,693.86 It is the recommendation of the Engineering Department, Traffic Engineering Section to award this project to the low bidder, Republic I.T.S subject to receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. Financial Impact:Funding is available in account 220-01-6310-5425310 upon Commission approval. Alternatives:1) Approve Award of the Light Emission Diode (LED) module Replacement Project to Republic I.T.S in the amount of $109,822. Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. 2) Do not approve. Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: 220-01-6310-5425310 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Cover Memo Item # 36 Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 36 Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia BE IT ORDAINED by the Commission-Council of Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia that the following Capital Project Budget is hereby amended: Section 1: Approve Award of the Light Emission Diode (LED) module Replacement to Republic I.T.S in the amount of $109,822. Award will be contingent on receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. One of the approved projects for this grant was replace the existing incandescent signal heads with LED signal heads at 71 intersections. Section 2: The following revenues are anticipated to be available to the Consolidated Government to complete the project. ARRA 109,822$ Section 3: The following amounts are appropriated for the project: Section 4: Copies of this Capital Project Budget shall be made available to the Comptroller for direction in carrying out this project. Adopted this ____________________ day of ______________________. Approved _________________________________________________ Original-Commission Council Office Copy-Engineering Department Copy-Finance Department Copy-Procurement Department Honorable Deke Copenhaver, Mayor CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET LED Replacement Project-Bid Item #10-139 CPB#N/A 9.2.2010 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 36 Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET LED Replacement Project-Bid Item #10-139 CPB#N/A CPB AMOUNT NEW SOURCE OF FUNDS CPB CPB ARRA 220-01-6310-5425310 $109,822 $109,822 TOTAL SOURCES: $109,822 $109,822 USE OF FUNDS ARRA 220-01-6310-5425310 $109,822 $109,822 TOTAL USES: $109,822 $109,822 9.2.2010 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 36 Invitation To Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until 3:00 p.m. Thursday, July 22, 2010 for furnishing: Bid Item #10-139 Light Emission Diode (LED) Signal Module Replacement Project for Engineering Department Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 706-821-2422 Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. A Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference will be held on Tuesday, July 6, 2010 @ 10:00 a.m. in the Procurement Department – Room 605. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. All questions are to be submitted in writing by Thursday, July 8, 2010 by 5:00 p.m. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference on an eligible local project, the certification statement as a local bidder and all supporting documents must be submitted to the Procurement Department with your bonafide bid package. No Bid may be withdrawn for a period of 60 days after time has been called on the date of opening. A 10% Bid bond is required to be submitted along with the bidders’ qualifications; a 100% performance bond and a 100% payment bond will be required for award. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia does not operate a DBE, MBE or WBE Program but rather pursuant to its code of ordinances, this local government operates instead a Local Small Business Opportunity Program. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle June 10, 17, 24, July 1, 2010 Metro Courier June 16, 2010 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Abie Ladson Engineering Department Hameed Malik Engineering Department Steve Cassell Traffic Engineering Department Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 36 Ve n d o r s : B & E E l e c t r i c a l 61 3 6 C o l u m b i a R o a d Gr o v e t o w n , G A 3 0 8 1 3 Re p u b l i c I . T . S . 27 2 5 1 1 4 t h S t r e e t Gr a n d e P r a i r i e , T X 7 7 0 5 0 Me t r o P o w e r 17 0 3 W e b b D r i v e No r c r o s s , G A 3 0 0 9 3 Mi d a s c o , L L C 50 0 A b b e y C o u r t Al p h a r e t t a , G A 3 0 0 0 4 Wo r l d F i b e r Te c h n o l o g i e s 40 7 0 N i n e M c F a r l a n d Al p h a r e t t a , G A 3 0 0 0 4 At t a c h m e n t B Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Y e s Bi d B o n d Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Y e s Ad d e n d u m 1 Ye s Y e s Y e s Y e s Y e s Bi d A m o u n t $1 4 9 , 8 2 3 . 5 2 $ 1 0 9 , 8 2 2 . 0 0 $ 1 9 9 , 5 3 2 . 0 0 $ 2 1 4 , 8 4 3 . 0 0 $ 2 1 8 ,6 9 3 . 8 6 Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 3 9 Li g h t E m i s s i o n D i o d e ( L E D ) S i g n a l M o d u l e R e p l a c e m e n t P r o j e c t Fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - E n g i n e e r i n g Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : T h u r s d a y , J u l y 2 2 , 2 0 1 0 a t 3 : 0 0 p . m . Pa g e 1 o f 2 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 2 Item # 36 Ve n d o r s : Ro a d w o r x 20 0 B l u f f O a k D r i v e Ro s w e l l , G A 3 0 0 7 6 Ba s s S i g n a l 55 9 2 P o w d e r S p r i n g s Da l l a s R o a d Po w d e r S p r i n g s , G A 30 1 2 7 No r t h C h e r o k e e E l e c t r i c P. O . B o x 4 0 9 8 Ca n t o n , G A 3 0 1 1 4 At t a c h m e n t B No E - V e r i f y Nu m b e r Bi d B o n d Ye s Ca h i e r s C h e c k Ad d e n d u m 1 Ye s Bi d A m o u n t No n - C o m p l i a n t Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 3 9 Li g h t E m i s s i o n D i o d e ( L E D ) S i g n a l M o d u l e R e p l a c e m e n t P r o j e c t Fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - E n g i n e e r i n g Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : T h u r s d a y , J u l y 2 2 , 2 0 1 0 a t 3 : 0 0 p . m . Pa g e 2 o f 2 Attachment number 3 Page 2 of 2 Item # 36 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 2 Item # 36 Attachment number 4 Page 2 of 2 Item # 36 Item # 36 Attachment number 6 Page 1 of 3 Item # 36 Attachment number 6 Page 2 of 3 Item # 36 Attachment number 6 Page 3 of 3 Item # 36 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Longpoint Townhomes, Phase 3-A Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement Department:Augusta Utilities Department Caption:Motion to approve and accept the Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Longpoint Townhomes, Phase 3-A. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:ATC Development Corp. has completed Phase 3-A of Longpoint Townhomes and wishes to dedicate the water distribution system and gravity sanitary sewer system to Augusta. Analysis:The Augusta Utilities Department has inspected the water distribution system and the gravity sanitary sewer system and found them to be compliant. Financial Impact:None Alternatives:Deny the motion to approve and accept the Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Longpoint Townhomes, Phase 3-A. Recommendation:Approve the motion to approve and accept the Deed of Dedication and Maintenance Agreement for Longpoint Townhomes, Phase 3-A. Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: N/A REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 37 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 6 Item # 37 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 6 Item # 37 Attachment number 1 Page 3 of 6 Item # 37 Attachment number 1 Page 4 of 6 Item # 37 Attachment number 1 Page 5 of 6 Item # 37 Attachment number 1 Page 6 of 6 Item # 37 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System Department:Engineering / Traffic Caption:Motion to approve award of the Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $710,990. Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:In June 2009, Augusta-Richmond County applied for and had approved an application for formula-based grants from the United States Department of Energy as part of the American Recovery and Revitalization Act of 2009 (ARRA, aka “Stimulus”). The intent of the grant is to fund projects that reduce greenhouse emissions through energy savings. One of the approved projects for this grant was the installation of Adaptive Traffic Control System along Washington Road between Pleasant Home Road and Woodbine Road The proposed adaptive traffic control system will utilize state-of-the-art sensor technology, image processing, and artificial intelligence to automatically optimize local traffic signals and provide coordination for the arterial according to real-time traffic demand, thus, eliminating the need for static signal timing and coordination plans. Installation will result in reduced travel times and fuel usage for the general motoring public along one of the more traveled corridors in Richmond County. Analysis:Bids were received on July 9, 2010 with B and E Electrical being the lowest compliant bidder. Vendor Bid B & E Electrical $710,990.00 It is the recommendation of the Engineering Department, Traffic Engineering Section to award this project to the low bidder, B & E Electrical subject to receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. Financial Impact:Funding is available ARRA ($660,000) and Phase III Recapture ($50,990) 323-041110-296823333 upon Commission approval. Alternatives:1) Approve Award of the Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $710,990. Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. 2) Do not approve. Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One Funds are Available in the Following ARRA 220-046310-5425310($660,000) & 323-041110-296823333 Cover Memo Item # 38 Accounts:($50,990) REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 38 Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia BE IT ORDAINED by the Commission-Council of Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia that the following Capital Project Budget is hereby amended: Section 1: Approve Award of the Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System to B & E Electrical in the amount of $710,990. Award will be contingent on receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. One of the approved projects for this grant was replace the installation of Adaptive Traffic Control System along Washington Road between Section 2: The following revenues are anticipated to be available to the Consolidated Government to complete the project. ARRA 660,000$ Phase III Recapture 50,990$ 710,990$ Section 3: The following amounts are appropriated for the project: Section 4: Copies of this Capital Project Budget shall be made available to the Comptroller for direction in carrying out this project. Adopted this ____________________ day of ______________________. Approved _________________________________________________ Original-Commission Council Office Copy-Engineering Department Copy-Finance Department Copy-Procurement Department Honorable Deke Copenhaver, Mayor CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System Bid Item #10-135 CPB#N/A Pleasant Home Road and Woodbine Road. 9.2.2010 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 38 Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System Bid Item #10-135 CPB#N/A CPB AMOUNT NEW SOURCE OF FUNDS CPB CPB ARRA $660,000 $660,000 Phase III Recapture $50,990 $50,990 TOTAL SOURCES: $710,990 $710,990 USE OF FUNDS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 0000000 $710,990 $710,990 TOTAL USES: $710,990 $710,990 9.2.2010 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 38 Invitation To Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until 11:00 a.m. Friday, July 9, 2010 for furnishing: Bid Item #10-135 Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bid Item #10-136 Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bid Item #10-137 Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 706-821-2422 Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. A Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference will be held on Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 10:00 a.m. in the Procurement Department – Room 605. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. All questions are to be submitted in writing by Tuesday, June 22, 2010 by 5:00 p.m. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference on an eligible local project, the certification statement as a local bidder and all supporting documents must be submitted to the Procurement Department with your bonafide bid package. No Bid may be withdrawn for a period of 90 days after time has been called on the date of opening. A 10% Bid bond is required to be submitted along with the bidders’ qualifications; a 100% performance bond and a 100% payment bond will be required for award. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia does not operate a DBE, MBE or WBE Program but rather pursuant to its code of ordinances, this local government operates instead a Local Small Business Opportunity Program. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle May 27, June 3, 10, 17, 2010 Metro Courier June 2, 2010 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Abie Ladson Engineering Department Hameed Malik Engineering Department Steve Cassell Traffic Engineering Department Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 38 Ve n d o r s : SI E M E N S 54 0 5 M E T R I C P L A C E NO R C R O S S , G A 3 0 0 9 2 RH Y T H M E N G I N E E R I N G 10 1 C Y P R E S S P O I N T HE N D E R S O N V I L L E , N C 28 7 3 9 B & E E L E C T R I C A L 61 3 6 C O L U M B I A R O A D GR O V E T O W N , G A 3 0 8 1 3 MI D A S C O , L L C 50 0 A B B E Y C O U R T AL P H A R E T T A , G A 30 0 0 4 OL H I N C . 10 0 5 B R O A D S T R E E T , SU I T E 1 0 0 AU G U S T A , G A 3 0 9 0 1 At t a c h m e n t B Ye s Y e s Bi d B o n d Ye s Y e s Ad d e n d u m 1 Ye s Y e s Bi d A m o u n t No n - C o m p l i a n t Bi d d e d Eq u i p m e n t O n l y $7 1 0 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 3 5 Wa s h i n g t o n R o a d A d a p t i v e T r a f f i c C o n t r o l S y s t e m Fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - E n g i n e e r i n g Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : F r i d a y , J u l y 9 , 2 0 1 0 a t 1 1 : 0 0 a . m . Pa g e 1 o f 1 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 1 Item # 38 Item # 38 Attachment number 5 Page 1 of 3 Item # 38 Attachment number 5 Page 2 of 3 Item # 38 Attachment number 5 Page 3 of 3 Item # 38 Attachment number 6 Page 1 of 1 Item # 38 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System Department:Engineering/Traffic Engineering Caption:Motion to approve award of the Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $369,120 Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. (Approved by Engineering Services Committee September 13, 2010) Background:In June 2009, Augusta-Richmond County applied for and had approved an application for formula-based grants from the United States Department of Energy as part of the American Recovery and Revitalization Act of 2009 (ARRA, aka “Stimulus”). The intent of the grant is to fund projects that reduce greenhouse emissions through energy savings. One of the approved projects for this grant was the installation of Adaptive Traffic Control System along Wrightsboro Road between Jackson Road and Barton Chapel Road. The proposed adaptive traffic control system will utilize state-of-the- art sensor technology, image processing, and artificial intelligence to automatically optimize local traffic signals and provide coordination for the arterial according to real-time traffic demand, thus, eliminating the need for static signal timing and coordination plans. Installation will result in reduced travel times and fuel usage for the general motoring public along one of the more traveled corridors in Richmond County. Analysis:Bids were received on July 9, 2010 with B and E Electrical being the lowest compliant bidder. Vendor Bid B & E Electrical $369,120 It is the recommendation of the Engineering Department, Traffic Engineering Section to award this project to the low bidder, B & E Electrical subject to receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. Financial Impact:Funding is available ARRA ($240,000) and Phase III Recapture ($129,120) 323-041110-296823333 upon Commission approval. Alternatives:1) Approve Award of the Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System to B and E Electrical in the amount of $369,120 Award will be contingent upon receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds as requested by AED. 2) Do not approve. Recommendation:Approve Alternative Number One Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: ARRA 220-016310-5425310($240,000) & 323-041110-296823333 ($129,120) Cover Memo Item # 39 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Finance. Procurement. Law. Administrator. Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 39 Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia BE IT ORDAINED by the Commission-Council of Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia that the following Capital Project Budget is hereby amended: Section 1: Approve Award of the Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System to B & E Electrical in the amount of $369,120. Award will be contingent on receipt of signed contracts and proper bonds. One of the approved projects for this grant was the installation of Adaptive Traffic Control System along Wrightsboro Road between Section 2: The following revenues are anticipated to be available to the Consolidated Government to complete the project. ARRA 240,000$ Phase III Recapture 129,120$ 369,120$ Section 3: The following amounts are appropriated for the project: Section 4: Copies of this Capital Project Budget shall be made available to the Comptroller for direction in carrying out this project. Adopted this ____________________ day of ______________________. Approved _________________________________________________ Original-Commission Council Office Copy-Engineering Department Copy-Finance Department Copy-Procurement Department Honorable Deke Copenhaver, Mayor CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System Bid Item #10-136 CPB#N/A Jackson Road and Barton Chapel Road. 9.2.2010 Attachment number 1 Page 1 of 2 Item # 39 Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System Bid Item #10-136 CPB#N/A CPB AMOUNT NEW SOURCE OF FUNDS CPB CPB ARRA $240,000 $240,000 Phase III Recapture $129,120 $129,120 TOTAL SOURCES: $369,120 $369,120 USE OF FUNDS Traffic Signals 00000000 $369,120 $369,120 TOTAL USES: $369,120 $369,120 9.2.2010 Attachment number 1 Page 2 of 2 Item # 39 Invitation To Bid Sealed bids will be received at this office until 11:00 a.m. Friday, July 9, 2010 for furnishing: Bid Item #10-135 Washington Road Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bid Item #10-136 Wrightsboro Road Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bid Item #10-137 Gordon Highway Adaptive Traffic Control System for Engineering Department Bids will be received by Augusta, GA Commission hereinafter referred to as the OWNER at the offices of: Geri A. Sams Procurement Department 530 Greene Street - Room 605 Augusta, Georgia 30901 706-821-2422 Bid documents may be obtained at the office of the Augusta, GA Procurement Department, 530 Greene Street – Room 605, Augusta, GA 30901. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at the offices of Augusta, GA Procurement Department. A Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference will be held on Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 10:00 a.m. in the Procurement Department – Room 605. All questions must be submitted in writing to the office of the Procurement Department by fax at 706-821-2811 or by mail. No bid will be accepted by fax, all must be received by mail or hand delivered. All questions are to be submitted in writing by Tuesday, June 22, 2010 by 5:00 p.m. The local bidder preference program is applicable to this project. To be approved as a local bidder and receive bid preference on an eligible local project, the certification statement as a local bidder and all supporting documents must be submitted to the Procurement Department with your bonafide bid package. No Bid may be withdrawn for a period of 90 days after time has been called on the date of opening. A 10% Bid bond is required to be submitted along with the bidders’ qualifications; a 100% performance bond and a 100% payment bond will be required for award. An invitation for bids shall be issued by the Procurement Office and shall include specifications prepared in accordance with Article 4 (Product Specifications), and all contractual terms and conditions, applicable to the procurement. All specific requirements contained in the invitation to bid including, but not limited to, the number of copies needed, the timing of the submission, the required financial data, and any other requirements designated by the Procurement Department are considered material conditions of the bid which are not waiveable or modifiable by the Procurement Director. Please mark BID number on the outside of the envelope. Bidders are cautioned that sequestration of BID documents through any source other than the office of the Procurement Department is not advisable. Acquisition of BID documents from unauthorized sources placed the bidder at the risk of receiving incomplete or inaccurate information upon which to base his qualifications. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia does not operate a DBE, MBE or WBE Program but rather pursuant to its code of ordinances, this local government operates instead a Local Small Business Opportunity Program. GERI A. SAMS, Procurement Director Publish: Augusta Chronicle May 27, June 3, 10, 17, 2010 Metro Courier June 2, 2010 cc: Tameka Allen Interim Deputy Administrator Abie Ladson Engineering Department Hameed Malik Engineering Department Steve Cassell Traffic Engineering Department Attachment number 2 Page 1 of 1 Item # 39 Ve n d o r s : SI E M E N S 54 0 5 M E T R I C P L A C E NO R C R O S S , G A 3 0 0 9 2 RH Y T H M E N G I N E E R I N G 10 1 C Y P R E S S P O I N T HE N D E R S O N V I L L E , N C 28 7 3 9 B & E E L E C T R I C A L 61 3 6 C O L U M B I A R O A D GR O V E T O W N , G A 3 0 8 1 3 MI D A S C O , L L C 50 0 A B B E Y C O U R T AL P H A R E T T A , G A 30 0 0 4 OL H I N C . 10 0 5 B R O A D S T R E E T , SU I T E 1 0 0 AU G U S T A , G A 3 0 9 0 1 At t a c h m e n t B Ye s Y e s Bi d B o n d Ye s Y e s Ad d e n d u m 1 Ye s Y e s Bi d A m o u n t No n - C o m p l i a n t Bi d d e d Eq u i p m e n t O n l y $3 6 9 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 Bi d I t e m # 1 0 - 1 3 6 Wr i g h t s b o r o R o a d A d a p t i v e T r a f f i c C o n t r o l S y s t e m Fo r t h e C i t y o f A u g u s t a - E n g i n e e r i n g Bi d O p e n i n g D a t e : F r i d a y , J u l y 9 , 2 0 1 0 a t 1 1 : 0 0 a . m . Pa g e 1 o f 1 Attachment number 3 Page 1 of 1 Item # 39 Attachment number 4 Page 1 of 1 Item # 39 Attachment number 5 Page 1 of 3 Item # 39 Attachment number 5 Page 2 of 3 Item # 39 Attachment number 5 Page 3 of 3 Item # 39 Attachment number 6 Page 1 of 1 Item # 39 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Minutes Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Commission held September 7th, and legal meeting held September 13, 2010. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 40 Commission Meeting Agenda 9/21/2010 5:00 PM Affidavit Department:Clerk of Commission Caption:Motion to authorize execution by the Mayor of the affidavit of compliance with Georgia's Open Meeting Act. Background: Analysis: Financial Impact: Alternatives: Recommendation: Funds are Available in the Following Accounts: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Clerk of Commission Cover Memo Item # 41