HomeMy WebLinkAboutCommission_Chambers5
27
Mr. Mayor: All right.
Mr. Mays: [inaudible] looking at [inaudible] lawsuit.
Mr. Mayor: You through?
Mr. Mays: Yes, sir.
Mr. Nlayor: Okay. Mr. Cheek?
Mr. Cheek: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I'm looking at motorcycle pants here, and I
see half a dozen different costs between the two vendors. If we continue to -- ~t's m]
erst. t we've massa ed and calculated these things a couple of times -- that
lends the a earance to the ublic that we're trying to adjust e ids and the outcome 0
the bids to suit a particular vendor. Agam, wou hope t at we WOll go throu 1
process with a standardized process, which is what I believe we're trying to get to in
Purchasing, and then follow through with it and not continually rehash and readjust
numbers. Being in the research field, I know that you can determine an outcome just
based on the amount of lead in your pencil when you're doing your calculations. But
those are the type inconsistencies, and I would in favor of tabling this or postponing it
until we can get the smoke cleared on this, to actually who is the lowest bidder on the
uniforms that we are going to buy.
Mr. Mayor: You want to make a motion to table? That would take precedence.
Mr. Cheek: A motion to table, Mr. Mayor.
Mr. Mays: Second.
Mr. Wall: You're talking about carrying it to a future meeting or later in this
meeting?
Mr. Mayor: Later in this meeting.
Mr. Cheek: I don't think we're going to sort through the smoke right now. We're
going to need a mighty large fan.
Mr. Mayor: Motion to postpone that?
Mr. Cheek: Motion to postpone.
Mr. Mays: Second is still there.
Mr. Mayor: Thank you. Mr. Kolb?
- ~ rV~
~ ;r-r- -~ d